Serum levels of the inducible 70 kDa heat shock protein (HSPA1A) are a biomarker for breast carcinoma in Brazilian women: an exploratory study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1358368/v1

PDF

Research Article

Serum levels of the inducible 70 kDa heat shock protein (HSPA1A) are a biomarker for breast carcinoma in Brazilian women: an exploratory study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1358368/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Introduction: The early diagnosis of breast cancer can improve treatment and prognosis. We sought to evaluate whether the serum concentration of 70 kDa heat shock protein (HSPA1A), was elevated in Brazilian women with breast cancer and whether the levels correlated with tumor characteristics.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional, analytical, case-control exploratory study performed at The University of São Paulo School of Medicine. From September 2017 to December 2018, 68 women with breast cancer and 59 controls were recruited. The HSPA1A concentration in serum samples was determined by ELISA by individuals blinded to the clinical data.

Results: The mean ages s in the study and control groups were 54.9 and 52.0 years, respectively. The median serum levels of HSPA1A were elevated in women with breast cancer (1037 pg/ml) compared with controls (300 pg/ml) (p <0.001). HSPA1A levels were increased in association with advanced histological tumor grade (p<0.001) and with the cell proliferation index (KI67) (p = 0.0418). The serum level of HSPA1A was similar in women with different histological subtypes, nuclear grade, hormone receptor expression, HER2 status and the presence or absence of angiolymphatic invasion.

Conclusion: Elevations in serum HSPA1A in Brazilian women with breast cancer and its association with advanced histological grade and proliferation index suggests that its detection may be of value as a component of breast cancer diagnosis and progression.

inducible 70 kDa heat shock protein

HSPA1A

breast cancer

breast tumor characteristics

The number of women diagnosed with breast cancer is increasing worldwide, and this malignancy is currently the second leading cause of death in women after cardiovascular disease. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated an incidence of 9,227,484 new cancer cases in women and a mortality of 4,429,323 in 2020. Among these were 2,261,419 new cases of malignant breast cancer with a mortality of 684,996 women [1, 2]. Malignant breast neoplasms, which are also one of the most common cancers among women in Brazil, second only to nonmelanoma skin cancer, correspond to approximately 28% of new cancer cases each year. The National Cancer Institute in Brazil (INCA) estimated 316,280 new cancer cases in Brazilian women in 2020, with a mortality of 107,235 cases; of these, breast cancer was responsible for 66,280 new cases and 17,572 deaths [3]. The possibility of a cure for women with this malignancy is increased when the cancer is diagnosed at an earlier stage [2]. Therefore, better identification of variables associated with the initiation and evolution of this malignancy is needed for improvements in prevention, diagnosis and treatment.

Heat shock proteins are a family of proteins that are essential for the maintenance of cell homeostasis. Under physiological conditions, these proteins contribute to protein assembly, intracellular transport and the repair or degradation of misfolded proteins [4]. Heat shock proteins also regulate cellular metabolism, mitosis and apoptosis [5]. Under non-physiological adverse conditions, the intracellular level of the inducible 70kDa heat shock protein (HSPA1A) becomes substantially elevated to preserve polypeptide structure and proper folding, inhibit programmed cell death and eliminate terminally damaged proteins. HSPA1A is also released from stressed cells and functions extracellularly to activate proinflammatory immunity [6]. Malignant transformation is one process that has been associated with elevated heat shock protein expression. Tumor cells typically express higher heat shock protein levels as a consequence of the hostile tumor cell environment due to deregulation of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes as well as increased nutrient deprivation, hypoxia and acidosis. The increased heat shock protein expression in tumorigenesis not only allows cells to tolerate cumulative mutations and the expression of altered proteins, which would otherwise be lethal, but this increased expression also promotes cell survival through the inhibition of apoptosis [7-10].

In view of the increasing incidence of malignant breast cancer and its high morbidity and mortality, new methods of diagnosis and treatment are currently being evaluated. It has been suggested that in women with breast cancer, serum levels of HSPA1A may be valuable as a diagnostic and predictive marker [11]. Elevated extracellular levels of HSPA1A have previously been identified in a number of malignancies [12-17]. An investigation of women with breast cancer concluded that elevated expression of HSPA1A was correlated with decreased disease-free survival [18].

Due to a need to further explore the potential utility of HSPA1A measurement in breast cancer, coupled with the paucity of studies correlating its expression with breast cancer in Brazilian women, the objective of our study was to determine whether circulating HSPA1A levels could differentiate between women with malignant breast lesions and women without breast cancer. The Brazilian population is unique in its admixture of racial and ethnic groups from different continents over the centuries [19]. This mixing may have conferred unanticipated variations in HSPA1A expression and/or its transport to the extracellular milieu. While this study was not specifically designed to analyze variations in HSPA1A expression according to histological subtype, hormone receptor and HER2 expression, histological grade, nuclear grade, stage, cell proliferation index and the presence of lymphatic or vessel invasion, these possible associations were assessed on an exploratory basis.

This exploratory, cross-sectional, analytical case-control study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo (project number 1035/2016) and by the Ethics Committee for Analysis of Research Projects at the Hospital das Clínicas of the USP Medical School (CAPPesq). Potential subjects were informed about the study at the time of a scheduled appointment, and if they agreed to participate and satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, they provided written informed consent.

Patient selection occurred between September 2017 and December 2018. During this period, all patients diagnosed with breast cancer who were seen at the First Consultation Clinic of the Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo and who satisfied the inclusion criteria were invited to participate. Patients without a diagnosis of breast cancer who met the inclusion criteria during the same period at the General Didactic Outpatient Clinic, at the Mastology section at the Hospital das Clínicas of the USP Medical School, were recruited for the control group.

The inclusion criteria of the breast cancer group were a histological diagnosis of breast cancer, no previous treatment for breast cancer, age between 25 and 75 years, the absence of signs or symptoms of other neoplasias and no previous history of other neoplasms. The exclusion criteria of the breast cancer group were the presence of noncarcinoma breast neoplasia, such as sarcoma or phyllodes tumor, and the presence of other comorbidities, such as nephropathies, liver disease, heart disease, hematopathologies, immunological diseases or other neoplasms. The inclusion criteria for the control group were women between 25 and 75 years of age, the absence of current signs or symptoms of other neoplasms and no previous history of neoplasms. The exclusion criteria for the control group were the presence of any neoplasia and the presence of other comorbidities, such as kidney disease, liver disease, heart disease, hematopathologies, immunological diseases or other neoplasms. Race was self-identified by each subject.

During the initial consultation, 10 ml of blood was collected in nonheparinized tubes and transported to the Structural and Molecular Research Laboratory in Gynecology at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo within 30 minutes of collection. After clot formation, the serum fraction was collected by centrifugation and stored in aliquots at -80°C. Thawed serum was diluted 1:200 in phosphate-buffered saline-Tween 20 and tested for the concentration of HSPA1A using a commercial ELISA kit validated for human sera and specific for HSPA1A (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Each sample was tested in duplicate, and the average values were obtained. Values were converted to pg/ml by reference to a standard curve that was generated for each assay. The lower limit of sensitivity was 156 pg/ml. The demographic and clinical data of the patients participating in the study were obtained through consultation of electronic medical records.

Based on histopathological characteristics according to the WHO criteria [20], breast cancer was classified as ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive carcinoma of no special type (invasive ductal carcinoma), invasive lobular carcinoma, and invasive mucinous carcinoma. The tumors were also classified into subtypes according to standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) findings. IHC was used to determine the expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER2 expression and the level of Ki67 [21, 22]. Ki67 is a marker of cell proliferation and is expressed exclusively during active phases of the cell cycle. Therefore, higher Ki67 values indicate an elevated rate of cell proliferation. Additional characteristics were used to classify the tumors based on histological grade and nuclear grade according to the 8th edition of the TNM classification system [23].

Statistical analysis

In all patients the HSPA1A levels are described using the median value and interquartile range. Values between categories were compared using the Mann-Whitney test for variables with 2 categories or the Kruskal-Walli tests for variables with more than 2 categories. The Spearman rank correlation test was used to evaluate associations between the HSPA1A level and clinical and demographic characteristics. The generalized linear model (MLG) was used for the variables that presented descriptive levels below 0.2 in the unadjusted analyses (p <0.2) and that had biological plausibility to influence the marker [24, 25]. The present study was designated as exploratory due to the limited number of participants and, thus, was underpowered to assess differences in HSPA1A among subtypes of breast cancer lesions. The analyses were performed using IBM-SPSS for Windows version 22.0 software and tabulated using Microsoft-Excel 2010 software, and all tests were performed with a 5% significance level.

This study included 141 women, 14 of whom were excluded (6 from the control group and 8 from the breast cancer group) due to hemolysis of the serum samples. Therefore, 59 serum samples from controls and 68 serum samples from cancer patients were analyzed. Three of the breast cancer patients had ductal carcinoma in situ, while the remainder had invasive breast cancer, 51 at an early stage (1A and 2A) while 13 had locally advanced disease (> stage 2A). None had metastatic disease, and no subject was positive for BRCA mutations.

The sociodemographic parameters of the breast cancer patients and controls are shown in Table 1. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in terms of age or body mass index. However, the racial distribution between the two groups was different. The control group had a higher proportion of White women (p = 0.0004), no Black women and a lower proportion of women of mixed race (p = 0.0538) than the cancer group. In addition, the educational level was lower in the cancer group than in the control group (p< 0.0029).

The HSPA1A level in the sera of individual breast cancer patients and controls is shown in Fig. 1. The median (interquartile range) value of HSPA1A was 1037 (560,1713) pg/ml in breast cancer patients and 300 (192,521) pg/ml in controls (p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney test).

The HSPA1A levels in breast cancer patients and controls adjusted for race and age are shown in Table 2. In both premenopausal (26-49 years of age) and postmenopausal (>50 years of age) women, HSPA1A levels were higher in White breast cancer patients than in controls (p < 0.0064). In women of mixed race, HSPA1A concentrations were also higher in cancer patients than in controls for both age groups, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.0571). Within the cancer group, women >50 and of mixed race had the highest HSPA1A levels (p = 0.0183 vs. White women).

Table 3 illustrates the serum HSPA1A levels in the cancer patients according to clinical stage and imaging findings. The 13 women with locally advanced breast cancer, > stage 2A disease, had the highest median HSPA1A level. However, this was not statistically different from the 3 women with in situ disease or the 52 with early stage malignancy (stage 1A or 2A). In terms of mammographic findings, the 11 women with microcalcifications had an elevated median HSPA1A level (1201 pg/ml), as compared to median levels in women with asymmetrical lesions (614 pg/ml) (p< 0.0474). No differences were observed in HSPA1A levels between the 55 women with a single lesion, the 12 women with a multifocal lesion or the one subject whose lesion was multicentric.

Serum values of HSPA1A in relation to anatomopathological and immunohistochemical findings are presented in Table 4. The HSPA1A level increased proportionally with the histological grade of the tumor (p<0.001). In contrast, the median HSPA1A level was not significantly different in women diagnosed with various histological subtypes. The HSPA1A level was increased in proportion to the cell proliferation index (Ki-67), yielding a median value of 1340 pg/ml when the index was >30 as opposed to values of 943 pg/ml and 579 pg/ml when the index was 15-30 and <15, respectively p = 0.0418). The concentration of serum HSPA1A was unrelated to the presence or absence of angiolymphatic invasion, estrogen or progesterone receptor expression or HER2 status.

In women with invasive breast cancer, no association was found between tumor diameter as assessed by mammography and the circulating HSPA1A level (Table 5).

In our study of Brazilian women on their first visit to a breast cancer clinic, serum levels of HSPA1A were greatly elevated in those with breast cancer as compared to those with no breast malignancy. In addition, among breast cancer patients significantly elevated levels were observed in those with the highest histological grade lesion and the highest cell proliferation index. Perhaps due to the limited sample size, no other statistically significant differences were observed in HSPA1A in relation to breast lesion characteristics or hormone receptor status. Our findings in Brazilian women parallel reports from other populations on the association between circulating HSPA1A levels and breast cancer [11, 12] and the absence of an association between HSP1A expression and the size of the mammary tumor [18].

It is known that highly undifferentiated breast tumors (histological grade 3) are the most aggressive, have greater lymph node involvement and have a greater capacity for cell replication (high KI67 index). The finding of the highest HSPA1A levels in breast cancer patients with these characteristics suggests that HSPA1A production and release into the circulation may be an indication of these factors. Our observations that the serum level of HSPA1A was lower in women with carcinoma in situ than in those with locally advanced invasive carcinomas and lower in well-differentiated slowly proliferating tumors than in more rapidly growing undifferentiated tumors are complementary to a prior analysis of intracellular HSPA1A levels in samples of breast cancer tissue [26]. These authors noted that increased expression of HSPA1A was related to decreased cell differentiation, that is, to tumors with a higher histological grade. Similarly, Vargas-Roig et al. [27] found a correlation between increased HSPA1A expression in breast carcinoma tissue biopsies and an increased mitotic index. The concordance of our extracellular findings with these intracellular analyses suggests that determination of HSPA1A levels in the extracellular milieu may be a less invasive method to evaluate these tumor-related variables. However, in a systematic review, Dimas et al. [18] found no relationship between the histological grade of breast tumors and the intracellular expression of HSPA1A. Additional studies are needed to determine whether population and/or racial variations influence these associations. Our study did not contain a follow-up component, and thus, we were unable to evaluate possible associations between the HSPA1A level and the development of recurrent or distant disease or survival.

An evaluation of hormone receptor and HER2 status is essential to optimize breast cancer treatment for individual patients. Surprisingly, only a few studies have evaluated the association between HSPA1A status and hormone receptor status in breast cancer. Takahashi et al. [28], after evaluating surgical samples of breast cancer tissue, reported higher HSPA1A positivity in estrogen receptor-positive tumors. Regarding progesterone receptors, Lazaris et al. [26] found a correlation between increased HSPA1A and the presence of the progesterone receptor. Dimas et al. [18] similarly identified a correlation between an increase in HSPA1A and the presence of hormone receptors but found no correlation between HSPA1A and HER2. In the present study, no differences were identified between serum levels of HSPA1A in women with breast cancer and the expression of these hormone receptors. It is possible that the differential release of HSPA1A from mammary tumors that are positive or negative for these receptors is too small to be detected in the systemic circulation. Differences in the populations studied may also contribute to the observed outcome variations.

Elevated extracellular expression of HSPA1A in women with breast cancer, in addition to being a marker of malignancy, suggests that this heat shock protein may participate in the initiation and/or persistence of carcinogenesis. While intracellular HSPA1A levels in tumor tissues were not evaluated in our study, it is well known that extracellular HSPA1A levels reflect elevated intracellular concentrations [6]. Intracellular HSPA1A can inhibit cell apoptosis and interrupt the senescence process, which are two mechanisms that are central to the prevention of unrestrained cell division and whose inhibition can lead to tumor formation [5, 9, 29].

Serum levels of HSPA1A are increased in Brazilian women with breast cancer compared with those with no malignant breast lesions. In this exploratory investigation, the further observation of a relationship between HSPA1A concentration and advanced tumor characteristics suggests that further studies of serum HSPA1A in breast cancer are warranted and have the potential to contribute to improved diagnoses, prognosis and treatment of this malignancy.

1 DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L and Jemal A: Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 64(1): 52-62, 2014. PMID: 24114568. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21203

2 World Health Organization: Publishing Global Cancer Observatory. 2021. Available at http://gco.iarc.fr/. Last accessed on 28th Febuary 2021.

3 INCA: Conceito e Magnitude do Câncer de Mama. 2020. Available at https://www.inca.gov.br/controle-do-cancer-de-mama/conceito-e-magnitude. Last accessed on 20th October 2020.

4 Whitley D, Goldberg SP and Jordan WD: Heat shock proteins: a review of the molecular chaperones. J Vasc Surg 29(4): 748-751, 1999. PMID: 10194511. DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70329-0

5 Calderwood SK, Khaleque MA, Sawyer DB and Ciocca DR: Heat shock proteins in cancer: chaperones of tumorigenesis. Trends Biochem Sci 31(3): 164-172, 2006. PMID: 16483782. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.01.006

6 Asea A: Initiation of the immune response by extracellular Hsp72: chaperokine activity of Hsp72. Curr Immunol Rev 2(3): 209-215, 2006. PMID: 17502920. DOI: 10.2174/157339506778018514

7 Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron JS, Nobel A, Deng S, Johnsen H, Pesich R, Geisler S, Demeter J, Perou CM, Lønning PE, Brown PO, Børresen-Dale AL and Botstein D: Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(14): 8418-8423, 2003. PMID: 12829800. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0932692100

8 Calderwood SK and Gong J: Molecular chaperones in mammary cancer growth and breast tumor therapy. J Cell Biochem 113(4): 1096-1103, 2012. PMID: 22105880. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.23461

9 Ciocca DR, Arrigo AP and Calderwood SK: Heat shock proteins and heat shock factor 1 in carcinogenesis and tumor development: an update. Arch Toxicol 87(1): 19-48, 2013. PMID: 22885793. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-012-0918-z

10 Davidson B, Valborg Reinertsen K, Trinh D, Reed W and Bøhler PJ: BAG-1/SODD, HSP70, and HSP90 are potential prognostic markers of poor survival in node-negative breast carcinoma. Hum Pathol 54: 64-73, 2016. PMID: 27038683. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.02.023

11 Gunaldi M, Afsar CU, Okuturlar Y, Gedikbasi A, Kocoglu H, Kural A, Akarsu C, Gunduz U and Tiken EE: Elevated serum levels of heat shock protein 70 are associated with breast cancer. Tohoku J Exp Med 236(2): 97-102, 2015. PMID: 26018606. DOI: 10.1620/tjem.236.97

12 Rothammer A, Sage EK, Werner C, Combs SE and Multhoff G: Increased heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) serum levels and low NK cell counts after radiotherapy - potential markers for predicting breast cancer recurrence? Radiat Oncol 14(1): 78, 2019. PMID: 31077235. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1286-0

13 Stangl S, Tei L, De Rose F, Reder S, Martinelli J, Sievert W, Shevtsov M, Öllinger R, Rad R, Schwaiger M, D'Alessandria C and Multhoff G: Preclinical evaluation of the Hsp70 peptide tracer TPP-PEG(24)-DFO[(89)Zr] for tumor-specific PET/CT imaging. Cancer Res 78(21): 6268-6281, 2018. PMID: 30228173. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-0707

14 Gunther S, Ostheimer C, Stangl S, Specht HM, Mozes P, Jesinghaus M, Vordermark D, Combs SE, Peltz F, Jung MP and Multhoff G: Correlation of Hsp70 serum levels with gross tumor volume and composition of lymphocyte subpopulations in patients with squamous cell and adeno non-small cell lung cancer. Front Immunol 6: 556, 2015. PMID: 26579130. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00556

15 Thorsteinsdottir J, Stangl S, Fu P, Guo K, Albrecht V, Eigenbrod S, Erl J, Gehrmann M, Tonn JC, Multhoff G and Schichor C: Overexpression of cytosolic, plasma membrane bound and extracellular heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) in primary glioblastomas. J Neurooncol 135(3): 443-452, 2017. PMID: 28849427. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2600-z

16 Gehrmann M, Cervello M, Montalto G, Cappello F, Gulino A, Knape C, Specht HM and Multhoff G: Heat shock protein 70 serum levels differ significantly in patients with chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Immunol 5: 307, 2014. PMID: 25071768. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00307

17 Gehrmann M, Specht HM, Bayer C, Brandstetter M, Chizzali B, Duma M, Breuninger S, Hube K, Lehnerer S, Van Phi V, Sage E, Schmid TE, Sedelmayr M, Schilling D, Sievert W, Stangl S and Multhoff G: Hsp70--a biomarker for tumor detection and monitoring of outcome of radiation therapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Radiat Oncol 9: 131, 2014. PMID: 24912482. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-131

18 Dimas DT, Perlepe CD, Sergentanis TN, Misitzis I, Kontzoglou K, Patsouris E, Kouraklis G, Psaltopoulou T and Nonni A: The prognostic significance of Hsp70/Hsp90 expression in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anticancer Res 38(3): 1551-1562, 2018. PMID: 29491085. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12384

19 Kehdy FS, Gouveia MH, Machado M, Magalhães WC, Horimoto AR, Horta BL, Moreira RG, Leal TP, Scliar MO, Soares-Souza GB, Rodrigues-Soares F, Araújo GS, Zamudio R, Sant Anna HP, Santos HC, Duarte NE, Fiaccone RL, Figueiredo CA, Silva TM, Costa GN, Beleza S, Berg DE, Cabrera L, Debortoli G, Duarte D, Ghirotto S, Gilman RH, Gonçalves VF, Marrero AR, Muniz YC, Weissensteiner H, Yeager M, Rodrigues LC, Barreto ML, Lima-Costa MF, Pereira AC, Rodrigues MR and Tarazona-Santos E: Origin and dynamics of admixture in Brazilians and its effect on the pattern of deleterious mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(28): 8696-8701, 2015. PMID: 26124090. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504447112

20 International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lakhani SR, Ellis I, Schnitt S, Tan P and Vijver MVD: WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2012.

21 Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B and Senn HJ: Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2013. Ann Oncol 24(9): 2206-2223, 2013. PMID: 23917950. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt303

22 Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Gnant M, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B and Senn HJ: Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2015. Ann Oncol 26(8): 1533-1546, 2015. PMID: 25939896. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv221

23 Cheang MC, Chia SK, Voduc D, Gao D, Leung S, Snider J, Watson M, Davies S, Bernard PS, Parker JS, Perou CM, Ellis MJ and Nielsen TO: Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(10): 736-750, 2009. PMID: 19436038. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp082

24 McCullagh P and Nelder JA: Generalized Linear Models. New York, NY, Chapman and Hall, 1989.

25 Kirkwood BR and Sterne JAC: Essential Medical Statistics. Massachusetts, Blackwell Science, 2006.

26 Lazaris A, Chatzigianni EB, Panoussopoulos D, Tzimas GN, Davaris PS and Golematis B: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and heat shock protein 70 immunolocalization in invasive ductal breast cancer not otherwise specified. Breast Cancer Res Treat 43(1): 43-51, 1997. PMID: 9065598. DOI: 10.1023/a:1005706110275

27 Vargas-Roig LM, Fanelli MA, López LA, Gago FE, Tello O, Aznar JC and Ciocca DR: Heat shock proteins and cell proliferation in human breast cancer biopsy samples. Cancer Detect Prev 21(5): 441-451, 1997. PMID: 9307847

28 Takahashi S, Mikami T, Watanabe Y, Okazaki M, Okazaki Y, Okazaki A, Sato T, Asaishi K, Hirata K and Narimatsu E: Correlation of heat shock protein 70 expression with estrogen receptor levels in invasive human breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 101(4): 519-525, 1994. PMID: 7909191. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/101.4.519

29 Nicholson DW and Thornberry NA: Caspases: killer proteases. Trends Biochem Sci 22(8): 299-306, 1997. PMID: 9270303. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01085-2

Authors' contributions GB, Project development, Data Collection, Manuscript writing; LP, MMM, Data collection; JRF, ECB, manuscript writing; IML, Project development, Data Collection, Manuscript writing

Data availability The study data will be available upon request.

Funding The study used resources from the Science without Borders Program of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests All authors report no conflicts of interest.

No competing interests reported.

PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
27 May, 2022
Reviews received at journal
18 May, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
06 May, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
23 Apr, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
23 Apr, 2022
Editor invited by journal
03 Mar, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
03 Mar, 2022
First submitted to journal
14 Feb, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Serum levels of the inducible 70 kDa heat shock protein (HSPA1A) are a biomarker for breast carcinoma in Brazilian women: an exploratory study

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

References

Declarations

Tables

Competing Interests

Status:

Version 1