Endoscopic Features of Oxyntic Gland Adenoma and Gastric Adenocarcinoma of the Fundic Gland Type Differ Between Patients with and Without Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Retrospective Observational Study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1360122/v1

PDF

Research Article

Endoscopic Features of Oxyntic Gland Adenoma and Gastric Adenocarcinoma of the Fundic Gland Type Differ Between Patients with and Without Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Retrospective Observational Study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1360122/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background

The endoscopic features of oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type have not been fully investigated in relation to Helicobacter pylori infection status. We compared the morphology, color, and location of these lesions between patients with and without H. pylori infection.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 165 patients (180 lesions) from 10 institutions. We divided the patients into the (i) Hp group (patients with current H. pylori infection [active gastritis, n = 13] and those with past infection [inactive gastritis, n = 76]) and (ii) uninfected group (H. pylori-uninfected patients, n = 52). We compared the clinical and endoscopic features of the two groups. We also performed an analysis between (i) lesions with atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa (atrophy group) and (ii) lesions without atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa (non-atrophy group).

Results

The average age was older in the Hp group than in the uninfected group (68.1 ± 8.1 vs. 63.4 ± 8.7 years, p < 0.01). Although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.09), multiple lesions were observed in 9 of 89 patients (10.1%) in the Hp group and in only 1 of 52 patients (1.9%) in the uninfected group. Meanwhile, significant differences were observed in the prevalence of lesions located in the gastric fornix or cardia (uninfected group: 67.3% vs. Hp group: 38.0%, p < 0.01), with an elevated morphology (80.0% vs. 56.0%, p < 0.01), with a subepithelial-like appearance (78.2% vs. 42.0%, p < 0.01), and with a color similar to that of the peripheral mucosa (43.6% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.02). The male-to-female ratio, lesion size, and presence or absence of vascular dilatation or black pigmentation on the surface were not different between the two groups. In the analysis comparing lesions with and without mucosal atrophy, the prevalence of multiple lesions was significantly higher (p = 0.02) in the atrophy group (5/25 patients, 20.0%) than in the non-atrophy group (7/141 patients, 5.0%).

Conclusions

The endoscopic features of oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type differ between patients with and without H. pylori infection.

gastric neoplasms

oxyntic gland adenoma

gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundicgland type

Oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type (GA-FG) are neoplasms composed of highly differentiated columnar cells, mainly chief cells, with pale basophilic cytoplasm and mild nuclear atypia, mimicking the oxyntic gland [1–3]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, a neoplasm confined to the mucosa is called an oxyntic gland adenoma, whereas a neoplasm with submucosal invasion is classified as GA-FG [1]. Since GA-FG was first described in a single case report in 2007 [4], this neoplasm has been predominantly observed as a subepithelial lesion in the upper third of the stomach during esophagogastroduodenoscopy [5–7]. However, some oxyntic gland adenomas and GA-FG present as flat lesions in other parts of the stomach.

We recently reported the clinicopathologic features of 126 oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG lesions in 116 patients from 10 institutions [8]. The lesions were classified into the following morphologic types: 0–IIa (57.1%), 0–IIb (31.0%), 0–IIc (7.1%), 0–IIa + IIc (3.2%), and 0–I (1.6%). Macroscopically, 64 lesions (50.8%) exhibited an elevated, subepithelial-like appearance. Through additional subgroup analyses, we observed that the endoscopic features of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG and their predominant locations differed between patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection. Therefore, in the current study, we analyzed the morphology, color, and location of these lesions in relation to H. pylori infection status, with more patients added to the population of our prior study.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients with histologically confirmed oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG, as previously described [8]. Histologic diagnoses were made on the basis of endoscopic biopsy, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or surgical resection. The diagnoses of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG were made on the basis of the presence of intramucosal proliferation of differentiated columnar cells, which have been found to mimic the oxyntic (fundic) gland [1]. The diagnoses were supported by positive immunohistochemical staining for pepsinogen I and mucin 6 (MUC6) in some patients. We identified 165 patients who were diagnosed with oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG between October 2008 and November 2021. These patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study.

We retrospectively examined the H. pylori infection status and endoscopic features, in addition to the patients’ sex, age at diagnosis, histologic features, treatments, and prognoses. Lesion morphology and depth of invasion were classified according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma [9, 10]. Briefly, polypoid-protruding tumors were classified as type 0–I. Slightly elevated superficial tumors were defined as type 0–IIa. Superficial flat tumors without elevation or depression were classified as type 0–IIb. Slightly depressed tumors were defined as type 0–IIc. Excavated tumors with depression were classified as type 0–III. We defined an “elevated lesion” as a tumor with a 0–I, 0–IIa, or 0–IIa + IIc morphology. The follow-up period was defined as the time from diagnosis to death of any cause or the last hospital visit. The endoscopic follow-up period was defined as the time from the endoscopic or surgical resection of the gastric lesions to the last esophagogastroduodenoscopy examination.

The H. pylori infection status was examined using urea breath tests, rapid urease tests, microscopic observations or culture tests of endoscopically biopsied specimens, stool antigen tests, serum or urine antibody tests, or a combination of these methods. On the basis of the results of these tests, we divided the patients into two groups according to their H. pylori infection status: (i) Hp group, consisting of patients with current H. pylori infection (active gastritis) and those with past infection (inactive gastritis), and (ii) uninfected group, consisting of H. pylori-uninfected patients. We also performed a secondary analysis based on the presence or absence of gastric mucosal atrophy around the lesion.

This study was approved by the ethics committees of Okayama University Hospital and the other participating institutions and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for written informed consent was waived because of the observational, non-interventional, and retrospective study design. All investigations were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

The patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1. This study included 108 men and 57 women. The mean age at diagnosis of oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG was 66.3 years (range, 43–91 years). Nine patients (5.5%) had two lesions, and two patients (1.2%) had four lesions. Thus, 180 oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG lesions were included in this study. The lesions were removed by ESD (n = 99, 55.0%), endoscopic mucosal resection using a diathermic snare (n = 68, 37.8%), surgery (n = 3, 1.7%), or ESD followed by surgery (n = 2, 1.1%), whereas no intervention was initiated for the other eight lesions (4.4%). The resected specimens of 170 lesions were pathologically analyzed for invasion depth. The depth of invasion was T1a in 99 lesions (55.0%) and T1b in 71 lesions (39.4%). Thus, 99 oxyntic gland adenoma lesions and 71 GA-FG lesions were included in this study. During the median follow-up period of 26 months (range, 0–155 months), four patients died of causes other than oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG (2.4%) and two patients had no outcome information. The remaining 159 patients were alive at the last follow-up (96.4%).

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the study patients
	n	%
Sex
Male	108	65.5
Female	57	34.5
Mean age (range), years	66.3 (43–91)
No. of lesions
1	154	93.3
2	9	5.5
4	2	1.2
Helicobacter pylori infection status
Uninfected	52	31.5
Active gastritis	13	7.9
Inactive gastritis	76	46.1
Undeterminable	24	14.5
Depth of invasion
T1a (oxyntic gland adenoma)	99	55.0
T1b (GA-FG)	71	39.4
Not available	10	5.6
Treatments
ESD	99	55.0
EMR	68	37.8
Surgery	3	1.7
ESD followed by surgery	2	1.1
None	8	4.4
Median follow-up period (range), months	26 (0–155)
Median endoscopic follow-up period (range), months^*	24 (0–155)
Outcome
Alive	159	96.4
Died of other cause	4	2.4
Unknown	2	1.2
GA-FG, gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR, endoscopic mucosal resection using a diathermic snare.
*169 lesions.

With respect to H. pylori infection status, 52 patients (31.5%) were uninfected, 13 patients (7.9%) had active gastritis, and 76 patients (46.1%) had inactive gastritis. The H. pylori infection status was undeterminable in 24 patients (14.5%). Thus, 89 patients (100 lesions) were classified into the Hp group and 52 patients (55 lesions) were classified into the uninfected group. A comparison of clinical and endoscopic features between the Hp and uninfected groups is shown in Table 2. The average age of the Hp group (68.1 ± 8.1 years) was older than that of the uninfected group (63.4 ± 8.7 years) (p = 0.002). Although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.092), 9 of 89 patients (10.1%) in the Hp group had multiple (two or four) lesions, whereas only 1 of 52 patients (1.9%) in the uninfected group had multiple (four) lesions. Oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG was more frequently found in the gastric fornix or cardia in the uninfected group (37/55 lesions, 67.3%) than in the Hp group (38/100 lesions, 38.0%) (p < 0.001, Fig. 1). With respect to macroscopic features, 44 of 55 lesions (80.0%) in the uninfected group showed elevation (0–I, 0–IIa, or 0–IIa + IIc), whereas 56 of 100 lesions (56.0%) in the Hp group appeared as elevated lesions (p = 0.003). Subepithelial-like lesions were more frequently observed in the uninfected group (43/55 lesions, 78.2%) than in the Hp group (42/100 lesions, 42.0%) (p < 0.001). A color similar to that of the peripheral mucosa was the most common lesion color in the uninfected group (24/55 lesions, 43.6%). In contrast, whitish (30/100, 30.0%) was most predominant lesion color, followed by yellowish–white (29/100, 29.0%), in the Hp group. Therefore, the prevalence of oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG showing a color similar to that of the peripheral mucosa was different between the groups (43.6% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.017). The male-to-female ratio, lesion size, and presence or absence of vascular dilatation or black pigmentation on the surface were not different between the two groups. Representative images of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG in the Hp and uninfected groups are shown in Fig. 2.

Table 2

Comparison of the Hp and uninfected groups
	Hp group		Uninfected group		p Value
	n	%	n	%
Sex					0.550
Male	59	66.3	37	71.2
Female	30	33.7	15	28.8
Mean age ± SD, years	68.1 ± 8.1		63.4 ± 8.7		0.002
No. of lesions					0.091^*
1	80	89.9	51	98.1
2	8	9.0	0	0.0
4	1	1.1	1	1.9
Mean size ± SD, mm	6.4 ± 4.5		6.6 ± 4.1		0.728
Depth of invasion					0.541^†
T1a (oxyntic gland adenoma)	56	56.0	27	49.1
T1b (GA-FG)	42	42.0	25	45.5
Not available	2	2.0	3	5.5
Location					0.001^‡
Fornix	26	26.0	28	50.9
Cardia	12	12.0	9	16.4
Body	62	62.0	17	30.9
Upper third of the body	30		10
Middle third of the body	26		4
Lower third of the body	6		3
Angle	0	0.0	1	1.8
Antrum	0	0.0	0	0.0
Pylorus	0	0.0	0	0.0
Morphology					0.003^§
0–I	1	1.0	1	1.8
0–IIa	53	53.0	41	74.5
0–IIb	34	34.0	10	18.2
0–IIc	10	10.0	1	1.8
0–IIa + IIc	2	2.0	2	3.6
0–III	0	0.0	0	0.0
Macroscopic appearance					< 0.001
SEL-like	42	42.0	43	78.2
Non SEL-like	58	58.0	12	21.8
Color					0.017‖
Similar to the color of the peripheral mucosa	25	25.0	24	43.6
Reddish	11	11.0	9	16.4
Whitish	30	30.0	10	18.2
Yellowish–white	29	29.0	9	16.4
Yellowish	5	5.0	3	5.5
Vascular dilatation on the surface					0.250
Present	66	66.0	34	61.8
Absent	34	34.0	21	38.2
Black pigmentation on the surface					0.822
Present	15	15.0	9	16.4
Absent	85	85.0	46	83.6
SD, standard deviation; GA-FG, gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type; SEL, subepithelial lesion.
^*Solitary vs. multiple lesions. ^†T1a vs. T1b. ^‡Fornix and cardia vs. others. ^§Elevated (0–I, 0–IIa, or 0–IIa + IIc) vs. depressed (other). ^‖Similar to the color of the peripheral mucosa vs. other.
The Hp group comprised patients with current Helicobacter pylori infection (active gastritis) and those with past infection (inactive gastritis). The uninfected group comprised H. pylori-uninfected patients.

Subsequently, we investigated the atrophy status of the gastric mucosa surrounding each oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG and subdivided the lesions into two groups based on the presence or absence of atrophy. The characteristics of the patients and the endoscopic features of the lesions in the two groups are presented in Table 3. One female patient had four lesions, two of which were associated with atrophy of the surrounding mucosa and the other two were not. Thereby, the atrophy group consisted of 12 male and 13 female patients, whereas the non-atrophy group included 96 male and 45 female patients. Although the difference was not significant (p = 0.052), the proportion of male patients was higher in the non-atrophy group (68.1%) than in the atrophy group (48.0%). The prevalence of multiple lesions was 20.0% (5/25 patients) in the atrophy group, which was significantly higher than that in the non-atrophy group (5.0%, 7/141 patients) (p = 0.020). The lesions in the non-atrophy group more frequently appeared in the gastric fornix or cardia (61.3% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.001), as elevated lesions (65.3% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.035), and as subepithelial-like lesions (58.0% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.002) than those in the atrophy group. The lesion size, invasion depth, lesion color, and presence or absence of vascular dilatation or black pigmentation on the surface were not different between the two groups.

Table 3

Comparison of lesions with and without atrophy of the surrounding mucosa
	Atrophy group		Non-atrophy group		p Value
	n	%	n	%
Sex					0.052
Male	12	48.0	96	68.1
Female	13^*	52.0	45^*	31.9
Mean age ± SD, years	69.7 ± 9.2		65.7 ± 9.1		< 0.001
No. of lesions					0.020^†
1	20	80.0	134	95.0
2	5^*	20.0	6^*	4.3
4	0	0.0	1	0.7
Mean size ± SD, mm		7.8 ± 7.2	5.9 ± 3.6		0.176
Depth of invasion					0.963^‡
T1a (oxyntic gland adenoma)	17	56.7	82	54.7
T1b (GA-FG)	12	40.0	59	39.3
Not available	1	3.3	9	6.0
Location					< 0.001^§
Fornix	2	6.7	66	44.0
Cardia	0	0.0	26	17.3
Body	28	93.3	57	38.0
Upper third of the body	11		31
Middle third of the body	17		16
Lower third of the body	0		10
Angle	0	0.0	1	0.7
Antrum	0	0.0		0.0
Pylorus	0	0.0		0.0
Morphology					0.035^‖
0–I	0	0.0	3	2.0
0–IIa	13	43.3	91	60.7
0–IIb	13	43.3	43	28.7
0–IIc	3	10.0	9	6.0
0–IIa + IIc	1	3.3	4	2.7
0–III	0	0.0	0	0.0
Macroscopic appearance					0.002
SEL-like	8	26.7	87	58.0
Non SEL-like	22	73.3	63	42.0
Color					0.196^¶
Similar to the color of the peripheral mucosa	6	20.0	51	34.0
Reddish	3	10.0	17	11.3
Whitish	9	30.0	38	25.3
Yellowish–white	10	33.3	38	25.3
Yellowish	2	6.7	6	4.0
Vascular dilatation on the surface					0.584
Present	17	56.7	93	62.0
Absent	13	43.3	57	38.0
Black pigmentation on the surface					1.000
Present	4	13.3	24	16.0
Absent	26	86.7	126	84.0
SD, standard deviation; GA-FG, gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type; SEL, subepithelial lesion.
^*One female patient had two lesions with atrophy of the peripheral mucosa and another two lesions without atrophy of the peripheral mucosa. ^†Solitary vs. multiple lesions. ^‡T1a vs. T1b. ^§Fornix and cardia vs. others. ‖Elevated vs. depressed. ^¶Similar to the color of the peripheral mucosa vs. other.
The atrophy group comprised lesions with atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa. The non-atrophy group comprised lesions without atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa.

We previously reported the clinicopathologic features of 116 patients with 126 oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG lesions and concluded that endoscopic resection is a suitable initial treatment strategy for these neoplasms [8]. In the current study, we added 49 patients with 54 oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG lesions to the previous study population, resulting in the largest number of lesions investigated to date.

A small, elevated lesion with a subepithelial tumor-like appearance occurring in the upper third of the stomach is a representative endoscopic feature of oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG [3, 4, 11–21]. Benedict et al. reviewed 111 previously reported cases and described that most tumors (89 cases, 80.2%) occurred in the upper third of the stomach [2]. Ueyama et al. reported a similar proportion of lesions in the upper third of the stomach (79/100, 79.0%) [6]. They also reported that 62 of the 100 lesions (62.0%) showed a protruded morphology. In the current study, the H. pylori-uninfected group showed the following typical features of oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG: (i) frequent occurrence in the gastric fornix or cardia; (ii) elevated, subepithelial lesion-like morphology; and (iii) a color similar to that of the peripheral mucosa. Conversely, in patients with current or past H. pylori infection, oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG appeared as flat lesions in atypical locations, rather than in the upper third of the stomach. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the difference in the endoscopic features of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG between patients with and without H. pylori infection.

H. pylori infection is a major causative factor in the development of conventional gastric cancer through chronic inflammation, in addition to environmental, dietary, and genetic factors [22]. In contrast, oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG are believed to develop independently of H. pylori infection, as most of these neoplasms arise in areas with no apparent atrophy endoscopically or pathologically [23]. In the present study, atrophic changes were not identified endoscopically in the surrounding mucosa in 150 of the 180 lesions (83.3%). Ueyama et al. investigated the clinicopathologic and molecular biological features of 100 lesions and found no significant differences between H. pylori infection-negative and H. pylori infection-positive or -eradicated groups, except for patient age and Ki-67 MIB-1 labeling index [6]. These results suggest that oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG have similar carcinogenesis and biological properties, regardless of the H. pylori infection status. However, we observed that the location and morphology were different between the Hp and uninfected groups. In addition, multiple tumors were more frequently found in the atrophy group than in the non-atrophy group (20.0% vs. 5.0%) in the present study.

On pathologic examination, the surface of these lesions is generally covered by normal-appearing foveolar-type epithelium [1, 2]. We speculate that oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG occurring in the gastric body, particularly flat lesions, are less detectable in patients without H. pylori infection owing to the non-atrophic, thick mucosa that covers the lesions. In contrast, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in patients with H. pylori infection, these lesions may be more noticeable in the mucosa, which shows atrophic change, inflammation, or metaplasia due to the infection. Another hypothesis is that oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG may be misinterpreted as fundic gland polyps and may be underdiagnosed in H. pylori-uninfected patients. These hypotheses might explain why the location, morphology, color, and number of lesions differed between patients with and without H. pylori infection. However, further investigation is required to elucidate the nature of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG in relation to H. pylori infection status.

As previously described, although an elevated, subepithelial lesion-like morphology is a representative endoscopic feature of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG, tumors often present as flat lesions [23–30]. Ueyama et al. reported that 62 of 100 lesions (62.0%) showed a protruded morphology, whereas the remaining 38 lesions (38.0) presented as flat or depressed lesions [6]. In the present study, we observed that the flat or depressed type of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG predominantly occurred in the gastric body in the Hp group (Fig. 1). As these lesions can show a whitish color (Fig. 2E,F), endoscopists may need to differentiate them from conventional gastric cancer and extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. Meanwhile, from the standpoint of pathologists, oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG may be mistaken for a neuroendocrine tumor or even non-neoplastic polyps on pathologic analysis [1]. Thus, endoscopists should be aware of the occurrence of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG with a flat or depressed morphology in the gastric body of patients with current or past H. pylori infection. In addition, endoscopists and pathologists should have a similar index of suspicion for oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG to make an appropriate diagnosis.

This study had several limitations. First, researchers at various institutions subjectively investigated the presence or absence of atrophy in the surrounding mucosa using endoscopic images. Interobserver variations and differences in methodologies between the participating endoscopists may have resulted in interpretation bias during the analysis of the atrophy and non-atrophy groups. Thus, pathologic evaluation of mucosal atrophy should be incorporated in the analysis of these cases. Second, immunohistochemical studies were not performed for all patients. Although a diagnosis can essentially be made according to the WHO classification criteria [1], confirmation by positive immunohistochemical staining for both pepsinogen I and MUC6, as well as cell differentiation markers such as H+/K+-ATPase (parietal cell) and MUC5AC (foveolar epithelium), is preferable [5–7].

We retrospectively investigated 165 patients with 180 oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG lesions. The lesions in the H. pylori-uninfected group predominantly showed typical features such as frequent occurrence in the gastric fornix or cardia, elevated and subepithelial lesion-like morphology, and a color similar to that of the peripheral mucosa. Endoscopists should be aware that these tumors may appear as flat lesions in atypical locations, instead of in the upper third of the stomach, in patients with current or past H. pylori infection. In addition, multiple tumors may exist in the atrophic mucosa. We believe that these features related to H. pylori infection status will facilitate the identification and prompt endoscopic diagnosis of oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committees of Okayama University Hospital and the other participating institutions and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for written informed consent was waived because of the observational, non-interventional, and retrospective study design. The waiver of informed consent was approved by the ethics committees of Okayama University Hospital and the other participating institutions.All investigations were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (MI)onreasonable request.The data are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors’ contributions

MI conceived the study and wrote the manuscript; CK, MN, KM, SK, MY, TI, T. Toyokawa, CS, and ST collected the data; and T. Tanaka and HO contributed to revising the obtained data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank our colleagues of the Okayama Gut Study Group (O-GUTs) who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research.

Yao T, Vieth M. Oxyntic gland adenoma. Digestive System Tumours, World Health Organization classification of tumours, 5th edition. WHO classification of tumours editorial board, edited. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon: World Health Organization; 2019. p. 83-4.
Benedict MA, Lauwers GY, Jain D. Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type: update and literature review. Am J Clin Pathol 2018; 149: 461-73.
Ushiku T, Kunita A, Kuroda R, Shinozaki-Ushiku A, Yamazawa S, Tsuji Y, et al. Oxyntic gland neoplasm of the stomach: expanding the spectrum and proposal of terminology. Mod Pathol 2020; 33: 206-16.
Tsukamoto T, Yokoi T, Maruta S, Kitamura M, Yamamoto T, Ban H, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma with chief cell differentiation. Pathol Int 2007; 57: 517-22.
Hayasaka J, Inoshita N, Suzuki Y, Nomura K, Odagiri H, Ochiai Y, et al. Pepsinogen I- and H+/K+-ATPase-immunohistochemical positivity in endoscopically resected early gastric neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 2022; doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001861.
Ueyama H, Yao T, Akazawa Y, Hayashi T, Kurahara K, Oshiro Y, et al. Gastric epithelial neoplasm of fundic-gland mucosa lineage: proposal for a new classification in association with gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland type. J Gastroenterol 2021; 56: 814-28.
Imamura K, Yao K, Nimura S, Tanabe H, Kanemitsu T, Miyaoka M, et al. Characteristic endoscopic findings of gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland mucosa type. Gastric Cancer 2021; 24: 1307-19.
Iwamuro M, Kusumoto C, Nakagawa M, Kobayashi S, Yoshioka M, Inaba T, et al. Endoscopic resection is a suitable initial treatment strategy for oxyntic gland adenoma or gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type. Sci. Rep.: 2021: 11: 7375.
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd, English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011; 14: 101-12.
Sano T, Aiko T. New Japanese classifications and treatment guidelines for gastric cancer: revision concepts and major revised points. Gastric Cancer 2011; 14: 97-100.
Nomura R, Saito T, Mitomi H, Hidaka Y, Lee SY, Watanabe S, et al. GNAS mutation as an alternative mechanism of activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type. Hum Pathol 2014; 45: 2488-96.
Terada T. Well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach composed of chief cell-like cells and parietal cells (Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type). Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2011; 4: 797-8.
Abe T, Nagai T, Fukunaga J, Okawara H, Nakashima H, Syutou M, et al. Long-term follow-up of gastric adenocarcinoma with chief cell differentiation using upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy. Intern Med 2013; 52: 1585-8.
Sato Y, Fujino T, Kasagawa A, Morita R, Ozawa SI, Matsuo Y, et al. Twelve-year natural history of a gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type. Clin J Gastroenterol 2016; 9: 345-51.
Takeda S, Mitoro A, Namisaki T, Yoshida M, Sawai M, Yamao J, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type (chief cell predominant type) with unique endoscopic appearance curatively treated by endoscopic submucosal resection. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2015; 78: 340-3.
Yu YN, Yin XY, Sun Q, Liu H, Zhang Q, Chen YQ, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type after Helicobacter pylori eradication: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7: 1696-702.
Singhi AD, Lazenby AJ, Montgomery EA. Gastric adenocarcinoma with chief cell differentiation: a proposal for reclassification as oxyntic gland polyp/adenoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2012; 36: 1030-5.
Fukatsu H, Miyoshi H, Ishiki K, Tamura M, Yao T. Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type (chief cell predominant type) treated with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy. Dig Endosc 2011; 23: 244-6.
Chan K, Brown IS, Kyle T, Lauwers GY, Kumarasinghe MP. Chief cell-predominant gastric polyps: a series of 12 cases with literature review. Histopathology 2016; 68: 825-33.
Miyazawa M, Matsuda M, Yano M, Hara Y, Arihara F, Horita Y, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland (chief cell-predominant type): a review of endoscopic and clinicopathological features. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 10523-31.
Imagawa A, Sano N. Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland (chief cell predominant type) with brownish pigmentation. GastrointestEndosc 2018; 87: 1358-9.
Wroblewski LE, Peek RM Jr, Wilson KT. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: factors that modulate disease risk. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23: 713-39.
Chiba T, Kato K, Masuda T, Ohara S, Iwama N, Shimada T, et al. Clinicopathological features of gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland (chief cell predominant type) by retrospective and prospective analyses of endoscopic findings. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 722-30.
Zhang H, Wang S, Zhang Y, Ye F, Wang C. Clinicopathological features of early stage gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type: case series. Med (Baltim) 2022; 101: e28469.
Fan X, Yang XS, Bai P, Ren YB, Zhang L, Li X, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type: A case report. Med (Baltim) 2020; 99: e20361.
Li C, Wu X, Yang S, Yang X, Yao J, Zheng H. Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type: clinicopathological features of eight patients treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Diagn Pathol 2020; 15: 131.
Ueo T, Yonemasu H, Ishida T. Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type with unusual behavior. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 293-4.
Ueyama H, Yao T, Nakashima Y, Hirakawa K, Oshiro Y, Hirahashi M, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type (chief cell predominant type): proposal for a new entity of gastric adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34: 609-19.
Ueyama H, Matsumoto K, Nagahara A, Hayashi T, Yao T, Watanabe S. Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type (chief cell predominant type). Endoscopy 2014; 46: 153-7.
Lee SY, Saito T, Mitomi H, Hidaka Y, Murakami T, Nomura R, et al. Mutation spectrum in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in gastric fundic gland-associated neoplasms/polyps. Virchows Arch 2015; 467: 27-38.

No competing interests reported.

PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
06 May, 2022
Reviews received at journal
05 May, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
12 Apr, 2022
Reviews received at journal
22 Mar, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
16 Mar, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
23 Feb, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
23 Feb, 2022
Editor invited by journal
23 Feb, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
23 Feb, 2022
First submitted to journal
14 Feb, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Endoscopic Features of Oxyntic Gland Adenoma and Gastric Adenocarcinoma of the Fundic Gland Type Differ Between Patients with and Without Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Retrospective Observational Study

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Figures

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Competing Interests

Status:

Version 1