This preprint is under consideration at Pilot and Feasibility Studies. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Elizabeth Allison Gilchrist
The University of Edinburgh
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6724-1613
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: We aimed to establish what core elements were required in a group therapy programme for men who disclose perpetrating intimate partner abuse in a substance use setting and develop, and test the feasibility of delivering an intervention in this setting.
Methods: We describe the theoretical development and feasibility testing of an integrated substance use and intimate partner abuse intervention(“ADVANCE”) for delivery in substance use services. We employed a comprehensive eight stage process to guide this development applying the ‘COM-B’ model for intervention design which specifies: 1) define the problem, 2) select the target behaviour, 3) specify the target behaviour, 4) identify what needs to change, 5) identify intervention functions, 6) identify policy categories, 7) select behaviour change techniques, and 8) design a mode of delivery. The development was informed by primary research conducted by the authors, consulting with organisation steering groups and by those with personal experiences. A feasibility study (ISRCTN 79435190) involving 104 men, 27 female partners and 30 staff at three different locations across the UK was conducted to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and to refine the content and approach to delivery.
Results: Our final intervention, the ADVANCE intervention consisted of a group intervention comprising of up to four pre-group individual interviews, followed by 12 x 2-hour group sessions supported by integrated safety work for victim/survivors, and risk and safety support and integrity support for the professionals. The main targets for change were personal goal planning, self-regulation and attitudes and beliefs supporting intimate partner abuse. The intervention was regarded as very acceptable to both staff and clients in substance use services, with group attendees reported positive behavior changes and development of new skills, that facilitators noted were ‘life-changing’ for some.
Conclusion: We have demonstrated the ability to employ a structured eight-step process to develop an integrated intervention to address substance use related intimate partner abuse that is acceptable to staff and clients in substance use services.
Keywords
substance use, intimate partner abuse, COM-B, group intervention, feasibility, intervention development
Figure 1
Figure 2
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version (no preprint)
Posted 25 Mar, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 25 Mar, 2021
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 25 Mar, 2021
Review #2 received
Received 19 Mar, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 12 Mar, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 12 Mar, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 11 Mar, 2021
Editor assigned
On 07 Mar, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 07 Mar, 2021
Editor invited
On 07 Mar, 2021
This version was not preprinted
Version 1
Posted 04 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 02 Feb, 2021
Review #2 received
Received 30 Jan, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 28 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 25 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 03 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 26 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 24 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 24 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 24 Dec, 2020
First submitted
On 22 Dec, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Psychology
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at Pilot and Feasibility Studies. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Elizabeth Allison Gilchrist
The University of Edinburgh
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6724-1613
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version (no preprint)
Posted 25 Mar, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 25 Mar, 2021
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 25 Mar, 2021
Review #2 received
Received 19 Mar, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 12 Mar, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 12 Mar, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 11 Mar, 2021
Editor assigned
On 07 Mar, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 07 Mar, 2021
Editor invited
On 07 Mar, 2021
This version was not preprinted
Version 1
Posted 04 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 02 Feb, 2021
Review #2 received
Received 30 Jan, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 28 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 25 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 03 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 26 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 24 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 24 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 24 Dec, 2020
First submitted
On 22 Dec, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Psychology
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: We aimed to establish what core elements were required in a group therapy programme for men who disclose perpetrating intimate partner abuse in a substance use setting and develop, and test the feasibility of delivering an intervention in this setting.
Methods: We describe the theoretical development and feasibility testing of an integrated substance use and intimate partner abuse intervention(“ADVANCE”) for delivery in substance use services. We employed a comprehensive eight stage process to guide this development applying the ‘COM-B’ model for intervention design which specifies: 1) define the problem, 2) select the target behaviour, 3) specify the target behaviour, 4) identify what needs to change, 5) identify intervention functions, 6) identify policy categories, 7) select behaviour change techniques, and 8) design a mode of delivery. The development was informed by primary research conducted by the authors, consulting with organisation steering groups and by those with personal experiences. A feasibility study (ISRCTN 79435190) involving 104 men, 27 female partners and 30 staff at three different locations across the UK was conducted to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and to refine the content and approach to delivery.
Results: Our final intervention, the ADVANCE intervention consisted of a group intervention comprising of up to four pre-group individual interviews, followed by 12 x 2-hour group sessions supported by integrated safety work for victim/survivors, and risk and safety support and integrity support for the professionals. The main targets for change were personal goal planning, self-regulation and attitudes and beliefs supporting intimate partner abuse. The intervention was regarded as very acceptable to both staff and clients in substance use services, with group attendees reported positive behavior changes and development of new skills, that facilitators noted were ‘life-changing’ for some.
Conclusion: We have demonstrated the ability to employ a structured eight-step process to develop an integrated intervention to address substance use related intimate partner abuse that is acceptable to staff and clients in substance use services.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Loading...