See the published version of this article at World Journal of Emergency Surgery.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
A Consensus Statement for Trauma Surgery Capacity Building in Latin America
Andres M. Rubiano
Neuroscience Institute, INUB-MEDITECH Research Group El Bosque University Bogotá, Colombia
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8931-3254
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published version at World Journal of Emergency Surgery.
Background: Trauma is a significant public health problem in Latin America (L.A.), contributing to substantial death and disability in the region. Several LA countries have implemented trauma registries and injury surveillance systems. However, the region lacks an integrated trauma system. The consensus conference's goal was to integrate existing L.A. trauma data collection efforts into a regional trauma program and encourage the use of the data to inform health policy.
Methods: We created a consensus group of 25 experts in trauma and emergency care with previous data collection and injury surveillance experience in the L.A. region. Experts participated in a consensus conference to discuss the state of trauma data collection in L.A. We utilized the Delphi method to build consensus around strategic steps for trauma data management in the region. Consensus was defined as the agreement of ≥ 70% among the expert panel.
Results: The consensus conference determined that action was necessary from academic bodies, scientific societies, and ministries of health to encourage a culture of collection and use of health data in trauma. The panel developed a set of recommendations for these groups to encourage the development and use of robust trauma information systems in L.A. Consensus was achieved in one Delphi round.
Conclusions: The expert group successfully reached a consensus on recommendations to key stakeholders in trauma information systems in L.A. These recommendations may be used to encourage capacity-building in trauma research and trauma health policy in the region.
Keywords
trauma, trauma registry, injury surveillance, Latin America, consensus statements, acute care, TBI, LMICs
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
Version 1
Posted 06 Jan, 2021
Published
On 30 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 14 Jan, 2021
Review #2 received
Received 12 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 05 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 03 Jan, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 03 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 02 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 27 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 27 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 27 Dec, 2020
First submitted
On 26 Dec, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Critical Care & Emergency Medicine
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at World Journal of Emergency Surgery. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
A Consensus Statement for Trauma Surgery Capacity Building in Latin America
Andres M. Rubiano
Neuroscience Institute, INUB-MEDITECH Research Group El Bosque University Bogotá, Colombia
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8931-3254
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
Version 1
Posted 06 Jan, 2021
Published
On 30 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 14 Jan, 2021
Review #2 received
Received 12 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 05 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 03 Jan, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 03 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 02 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 27 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 27 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 27 Dec, 2020
First submitted
On 26 Dec, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Critical Care & Emergency Medicine
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published version at World Journal of Emergency Surgery.
Background: Trauma is a significant public health problem in Latin America (L.A.), contributing to substantial death and disability in the region. Several LA countries have implemented trauma registries and injury surveillance systems. However, the region lacks an integrated trauma system. The consensus conference's goal was to integrate existing L.A. trauma data collection efforts into a regional trauma program and encourage the use of the data to inform health policy.
Methods: We created a consensus group of 25 experts in trauma and emergency care with previous data collection and injury surveillance experience in the L.A. region. Experts participated in a consensus conference to discuss the state of trauma data collection in L.A. We utilized the Delphi method to build consensus around strategic steps for trauma data management in the region. Consensus was defined as the agreement of ≥ 70% among the expert panel.
Results: The consensus conference determined that action was necessary from academic bodies, scientific societies, and ministries of health to encourage a culture of collection and use of health data in trauma. The panel developed a set of recommendations for these groups to encourage the development and use of robust trauma information systems in L.A. Consensus was achieved in one Delphi round.
Conclusions: The expert group successfully reached a consensus on recommendations to key stakeholders in trauma information systems in L.A. These recommendations may be used to encourage capacity-building in trauma research and trauma health policy in the region.