DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1398292/v1
We investigated the reference values of liver enzymes based on cardiometabolic risks among children and adolescents using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). A total of 8,091 subjects aged 10–18 years were included from data from 2007–2017. Overall, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and the AST/ALT ratio varied with sex and age. AST levels tended to decrease with age, but ALT levels had a U-shaped curve, which resulted in a gradual increase in the AST/ALT ratio after age 13. The prevalence of MetS was strongly associated with elevated AST or ALT and a decreased AST/ALT ratio. The odds ratios of the development of MetS were elevated in groups with high levels of AST and ALT and a low AST/ALT ratio. Particularly in the combined ALT and AST/ALT analyses, borderline-high levels also showed a high odds ratio of MetS. Liver enzymes were also involved in the increase in the adjusted mean values for each risk factor for MetS. Here, we provided updated reference values for liver enzymes based on the analysis between population-based data and cardiometabolic risk factors; AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio might be useful in the early diagnosis and treatment of the MetS.
Rates of childhood obesity and metabolic syndrome are increasing worldwide 1. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a pathophysiological state that has been used to associate overweight and obesity and their consequences such as cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus. Since National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) defined metabolic syndrome in the adult population in 2001, subsequent studies have been conducted using modified criteria for MetS for children and adolescents and reported an increasing prevalence of MetS. Although many different criteria resulted in difficulty estimating the exact prevalence in pediatric populations, a recent systematic review reported that the estimated prevalence of pediatric MetS ranged from 0.3–26.4% according to different geographic locations and populations 2. In addition, the prevalence rates of MetS according to the modified NCEP-ATP III criteria have been reported to range from 5.7–10.9% in Korean studies 3,4.
Hepatic involvement of MetS is commonly observed as hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); pathological fat accumulation associated with chronic inflammation in the liver results in detrimental consequences, including impairment of glucose and lipid metabolism and an increase in cardiovascular events combined with oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction and hypercoagulability 5. Therefore, the recent current consensus recommends screening for NAFLD in children with accompanying MetS 6. However, there is wide variability in the upper limit of normal for AST or ALT across different ages and between the sexes. The distinction of liver disease usually depends on the cutoff values that define an abnormal test, which is also critical for sensitivity and specificity 7; this is the reason it is necessary to analyze population based data to establish reference intervals.
Several lines of studies have reported the upper limits of normal for liver enzymes in children and adolescents. In the United States, a population-based study suggested that the upper limits of normal foe ALT in metabolically normal individuals without liver disease were 26 mg/dl for boys and 22 mg/dl for girls 8. Furthermore, in a Canadian study, the cutoff value for ALT was suggested to be 30 mg/dl in children between 1 and 12 years of age and 24 mg/dl in those between 13 and 19 years 9. In other regions, including Europe 10,11, the United Kingdom 12, Mexico 13, Sweden 14, Iran 15, Taiwan 16 and China 17, the reference ranges of liver enzymes in children were evaluated in a similar manner. However, in Korean children and adolescents, the similar studies were not population-based, and the association with metabolic syndrome was not analyzed 18 or adult data 19.
In this study, we aimed to establish sex- and age-stratified reference intervals based on a healthy non-hospitalized pediatric population using data from KNHANES 2007–2017. We analyzed liver enzyme levels and other biochemical, physical, and social data from KNHAES, to assess the association of AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio with MetS. Related components of MetS were also analyzed based on the normal, borderline-high and high levels of liver enzymes. Through the results of our population-based group study, we expect to add to our understanding of the roles of liver enzymes and a related ratio in MetS and provide a basis for novel liver enzyme reference ranges for children and adolescents in assessing the risk for MetS.
The subjects in this study were from KNHANES 2007–2017. The database is available to the public at the KNHANES website (http://knhanes.cdc.go.kr) and details of the KNHANES have been described previously 26. The initial subjects comprised 10,033 children and adolescents among a total of 89,630 subjects. Subjects who had missing anthropometric data (n = 733) and those missing blood laboratory results or had any type of hepatitis were excluded (n = 733). Subjects with abnormal triglyceride (TG) levels (≥ 400mg/dL) (n = 16) were excluded because low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were calculated with Friedewald’s Eq. 27.
Every participant of KNHANES gave informed consent at the time of data collection. KNHANES were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations of the National Health Promotion Act in Korea. All methods used in this study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. This study was approved by the IRB of Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital (IRB No. CHUNCHEON 2021-10-004), and the IRB waived the requirement for written informed consent due to the retrospective study design.
2. Measurements.
Anthropometric data and blood pressure (BP) were measured by trained experts according to standardized protocols. Details of the anthropometric measurements have been described previously 26. Standard deviation scores (SDSs) were used for height, weight, BMI, and WC which were calculated with the LMS methods using the 2017 Korean reference 28. Blood samples were collected after the participants fasted for at least 8 h. Samples were immediately centrifuged, transported to a central laboratory (NeoDin Medical Institute, Seoul, Korea) and analyzed within 24 hours. Serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), TG, and glucose levels were measured enzymatically using a Hitachi 7600 automatic analyzer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). LDL-C was calculated with Friedewald’s Eq. 27.
3. Collection of lifestyle parameters and socioeconomic status.
Lifestyle-related parameters and socioeconomic information were collected by questionnaires. Smoking was defined as having smoked more than five packs of cigarettes throughout one’s lifetime. Alcohol consumption was defined as at least two alcoholic beverages/month during the previous year. Physical activity was defined as: (1) intense physical activity for 30 min at least three days/week, (2) moderate physical activity for 30 min at least five days/week, or (3) walking for 30 min at least five days/week. Based on physical activity, subjects were classified as exercising or non-exercising. For socioeconomic information, household income was categorized as being within the lowest quartile or not. The residence area was divided into urban and rural areas.
4. Definitions of MetS and its components.
Obesity and overweight were defined as ≥ 95th and ≥ 85th but <95th percentile, respectively, as shown in a previous study 28. The definition of MetS followed the modified criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III), as previously described in our published paper 26; subjects who met 3 of the following 5 criteria were defined as having MetS: (1) increased WC based on the Korean pediatric population; ≥90th percentile for age and sex according to the 2017 Korean growth chart 28; (2) elevated BP, namely, SBP or DBP ≥ 90th percentile for age- and sex-matched reference data from the Korean pediatric population 28 or treatment with antihypertensive medication; (3) fasting blood glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL or treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); (4) elevated TG (≥ 110 mg/dL); and (5) low HDL-C (<40 mg/dL). T2DM was diagnosed satisfying one or more of the criteria: (1) subjects who self-reported their disease using a questionnaire, (2) current medication or insulin use to manage T2DM, or (3) subjects with a fasting glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL during the survey period.
The basic characteristics consisted of continuous variables and categorical variables; each variable is presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and frequencies or percentages (%), respectively. Student’s t-test was used to compare the means of the demographic and biochemical characteristics. The chi-square (χ2) test was used to compare clinical categorical variables between boys and girls.
We obtained percentile curves of AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio as a function of age as a continuous variable, stratified by sex using the LMS model to fit smoothed L (skew), M (median), and S (coefficient of variation) curves using the General Additive Model for Location Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) package version 4.2.6. of the R statistical package. The Box–Cox Cole and Green, gamma or inverse Gaussian distributions were fitted to the observed distribution of AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio. Percentile curves were generated for the 3rd, 5th, 10th, 15th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 85th, 90th, 95th and 97th percentiles. The adjusted mean values of cardiometabolic risk factors were compared between three groups (normal < 75th; borderline high, ≥ 75th and < 95th; and high, ≥ 95th percentile) using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test after adjusting for sex, age, BMI SDS, alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, residence, household income, and diagnosis of hypertension, T2DM, and dyslipidemia. We estimated the adjusted ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MetS among the normal, borderline high and high groups by multiple logistic regression analysis. The estimates were adjusted for sex, age, BMI SDS, alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, residence, household income, diagnosis of hypertension, T2DM, and dyslipidemia. P < 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance. All statistical analyses in this study were performed using R statistical package version 3.5.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Among KNHANES from 2007 to 2017, a total of 8,091 children and adolescents were selected for this study (4,307 male and 3,784 female) (Fig. 1). The clinical characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1. The mean ages of the subjects were 14.30 ± 2.51 and 14.36 ± 2.51 for males and females, respectively. There were significant sex differences in the height SDS, the WC SDS, BP, AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio, glucose, T-C, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity and rural residence.
Boys | Girls | P | |
---|---|---|---|
n = 4,307 | n = 3,784 | ||
Age (years) | 14.30 ± 2.51 | 14.36 ± 2.51 | 0.249 |
Height SDS | 0.25 ± 1.05 | 0.19 ± 1.05 | 0.004 |
Weight SDS | 0.10 ± 1.22 | 0.05 ± 1.14 | 0.081 |
Waist circumference SDS | -0.24 ± 1.13 | -0.19 ± 1.09 | 0.028 |
BMI SDS | -0.04 ± 1.29 | -0.05 ± 1.19 | 0.646 |
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 108.80 ± 10.59 | 104.21 ± 9.30 | < 0.001 |
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 66.38 ± 9.64 | 65.56 ± 8.28 | < 0.001 |
AST (IU/L) | 18.03 ± 19.96 | 12.16 ± 7.48 | < 0.001 |
ALT (IU/L) | 21.04 ± 10.93 | 17.52 ± 5.02 | < 0.001 |
AST/ALT ratio | 1.44 ± 0.61 | 1.61 ± 0.49 | < 0.001 |
Glucose (mg/dL) | 90.83 ± 7.98 | 89.43 ± 9.04 | < 0.001 |
T-C (mg/dL) | 155.80 ± 27.07 | 163.82 ± 26.30 | < 0.001 |
TG (mg/dL) | 49.86 ± 9.91 | 52.22 ± 9.86 | < 0.001 |
HDL-C (mg/dL) | 83.03 ± 47.31 | 86.57 ± 44.22 | 0.001 |
LDL-C (mg/dL) | 89.39 ± 23.25 | 94.27 ± 22.89 | < 0.001 |
Alcohol consumption (%) | 1172 (27.21%) | 865 (22.86%) | < 0.001 |
Smoking | 681 (15.81%) | 249 (6.58%) | < 0.001 |
Physical activity | 2515 (58.39%) | 2088 (55.18%) | < 0.001 |
Rural residence | 700 (16.25%) | 612 (16.17%) | 0.004 |
Household income ≤ 1st quartile | 467 (10.84%) | 418 (11.05%) | 0.947 |
Diagnosis of hypertension | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | > 0.999 |
Diagnosis of T2DM | 2 (0.1%) | 2 (0.1%) | > 0.999 |
Diagnosis of dyslipidemia | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | > 0.999 |
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) | |||
SDS, standard deviation score; BMI, body mass index; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; T-C, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. |
The age- and sex-specific distributions AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio are shown in Fig. 2. The percentile values for each age and sex, corresponding to LMS variables, are summarized in Table 2. Values of AST and ALT varied considerably according to sex and age; the percentile curve of AST tended to decrease as both boys and girls aged, but the ALT curves were slightly U-shaped in both sexes. Overall variations in AST and ALT according to age were higher in the upper percentile groups (≥ 75th percentile) than in the lower percentile groups (3rd − 50th percentiles). Trends of the AST/ALT ratio decreased according to age and skewed to the left in both boys and girls; however, the levels were significantly higher in girls than in boys. Moreover, the overall AST/ALT ratio was relatively constant and decreased slightly over time.
AST in boys | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | n | L | M | S | 3rd | 5th | 10th | 15th | 25th | 50th | 75th | 85th | 90th | 95th | 97th |
10 | 477 | -1.181 | 23.386 | 0.157 | 16.859 | 17.710 | 18.959 | 19.777 | 20.978 | 23.375 | 26.450 | 28.753 | 30.802 | 35.119 | 39.351 |
11 | 516 | -1.181 | 22.258 | 0.162 | 15.897 | 16.719 | 17.929 | 18.724 | 19.896 | 22.245 | 25.285 | 27.580 | 29.632 | 33.992 | 38.302 |
12 | 524 | -1.181 | 21.102 | 0.168 | 14.928 | 15.718 | 16.887 | 17.656 | 18.793 | 21.088 | 24.082 | 26.359 | 28.409 | 32.797 | 37.173 |
13 | 543 | -1.181 | 19.871 | 0.174 | 13.921 | 14.675 | 15.795 | 16.534 | 17.631 | 19.855 | 22.784 | 25.030 | 27.064 | 31.454 | 35.871 |
14 | 524 | -1.181 | 18.734 | 0.180 | 12.993 | 13.715 | 14.787 | 15.498 | 16.557 | 18.716 | 21.585 | 23.803 | 25.825 | 30.224 | 34.691 |
15 | 480 | -1.181 | 17.939 | 0.186 | 12.315 | 13.015 | 14.059 | 14.754 | 15.791 | 17.919 | 20.773 | 22.999 | 25.041 | 29.52 | 34.112 |
16 | 421 | -1.181 | 17.562 | 0.192 | 11.931 | 12.625 | 13.663 | 14.356 | 15.394 | 17.539 | 20.441 | 22.726 | 24.835 | 29.501 | 34.329 |
17 | 427 | -1.181 | 17.527 | 0.199 | 11.781 | 12.481 | 13.534 | 14.239 | 15.298 | 17.501 | 20.510 | 22.900 | 25.122 | 30.081 | 35.258 |
18 | 395 | -1.181 | 17.660 | 0.206 | 11.741 | 12.455 | 13.531 | 14.255 | 15.346 | 17.629 | 20.779 | 23.304 | 25.668 | 30.989 | 36.597 |
All boys | 4,307 | 12.953 | 13.446 | 14.922 | 15.094 | 16.974 | 19.103 | 22.989 | 25.002 | 26.992 | 31.46 | 36.793 | |||
AST in girls | |||||||||||||||
10 | 415 | -0.719 | 22.041 | 0.157 | 15.924 | 16.698 | 17.856 | 18.626 | 19.769 | 22.040 | 24.799 | 26.691 | 28.246 | 31.182 | 33.699 |
11 | 444 | -0.719 | 19.836 | 0.160 | 14.268 | 14.970 | 16.022 | 16.723 | 17.763 | 19.836 | 22.361 | 24.097 | 25.526 | 28.232 | 30.559 |
12 | 431 | -0.719 | 17.925 | 0.162 | 12.836 | 13.476 | 14.435 | 15.075 | 16.026 | 17.925 | 20.245 | 21.845 | 23.165 | 25.669 | 27.829 |
13 | 463 | -0.719 | 16.660 | 0.165 | 11.876 | 12.475 | 13.375 | 13.976 | 14.871 | 16.659 | 18.853 | 20.369 | 21.623 | 24.007 | 26.070 |
14 | 469 | -0.719 | 16.045 | 0.167 | 11.385 | 11.967 | 12.842 | 13.426 | 14.298 | 16.044 | 18.193 | 19.682 | 20.916 | 23.269 | 25.310 |
15 | 399 | -0.719 | 15.747 | 0.170 | 11.122 | 11.698 | 12.564 | 13.143 | 14.009 | 15.747 | 17.891 | 19.382 | 20.620 | 22.986 | 25.046 |
16 | 414 | -0.719 | 15.440 | 0.172 | 10.854 | 11.422 | 12.279 | 12.853 | 13.712 | 15.439 | 17.578 | 19.069 | 20.309 | 22.687 | 24.764 |
17 | 421 | -0.719 | 15.295 | 0.175 | 10.701 | 11.268 | 12.125 | 12.699 | 13.559 | 15.294 | 17.449 | 18.955 | 20.212 | 22.627 | 24.743 |
18 | 328 | -0.719 | 15.432 | 0.178 | 10.745 | 11.322 | 12.194 | 12.779 | 13.657 | 15.432 | 17.643 | 19.194 | 20.490 | 22.988 | 25.184 |
All girls | 3784 | 11.233 | 12.000 | 13.000 | 13.954 | 14.737 | 16.980 | 19.547 | 21.024 | 22.771 | 25.297 | 27.226 | |||
ALT in boys | |||||||||||||||
10 | 477 | -1.593 | 14.971 | 0.380 | 8.095 | 8.724 | 9.727 | 10.442 | 11.593 | 14.329 | 18.960 | 23.371 | 27.939 | 39.113 | 51.319 |
11 | 516 | -1.593 | 14.526 | 0.366 | 7.980 | 8.591 | 9.561 | 10.251 | 11.356 | 13.966 | 18.346 | 22.494 | 26.781 | 37.260 | 48.714 |
12 | 524 | -1.593 | 13.948 | 0.355 | 7.761 | 8.348 | 9.276 | 9.934 | 10.986 | 13.457 | 17.571 | 21.450 | 25.451 | 35.223 | 45.908 |
13 | 543 | -1.593 | 13.349 | 0.353 | 7.442 | 8.003 | 8.892 | 9.521 | 10.526 | 12.886 | 16.810 | 20.507 | 24.319 | 33.629 | 43.809 |
14 | 524 | -1.593 | 13.062 | 0.369 | 7.153 | 7.702 | 8.575 | 9.195 | 10.191 | 12.547 | 16.507 | 20.262 | 24.145 | 33.637 | 44.010 |
15 | 480 | -1.593 | 13.265 | 0.404 | 6.993 | 7.549 | 8.440 | 9.079 | 10.113 | 12.597 | 16.857 | 20.946 | 25.194 | 35.591 | 46.939 |
16 | 421 | -1.593 | 14.057 | 0.455 | 7.032 | 7.616 | 8.561 | 9.246 | 10.365 | 13.104 | 17.915 | 22.595 | 27.478 | 39.435 | 52.457 |
17 | 427 | -1.593 | 15.290 | 0.525 | 7.149 | 7.771 | 8.790 | 9.535 | 10.769 | 13.854 | 19.405 | 24.875 | 30.599 | 44.608 | 59.821 |
18 | 395 | -1.593 | 16.709 | 0.625 | 7.168 | 7.823 | 8.908 | 9.713 | 11.060 | 14.501 | 20.845 | 27.162 | 33.785 | 49.966 | 67.486 |
All boys | 4,307 | 7.818 | 8.000 | 9.000 | 9.848 | 10.994 | 13.045 | 18.192 | 23.317 | 28.001 | 39.472 | 54.059 | |||
ALT in girls | |||||||||||||||
10 | 415 | -0.749 | 12.447 | 0.288 | 7.194 | 7.755 | 8.644 | 9.271 | 10.256 | 12.437 | 15.572 | 18.099 | 20.449 | 25.673 | 31.120 |
11 | 444 | -0.749 | 11.638 | 0.274 | 6.886 | 7.403 | 8.218 | 8.789 | 9.680 | 11.631 | 14.385 | 16.566 | 18.566 | 22.931 | 27.384 |
12 | 431 | -0.749 | 10.916 | 0.264 | 6.558 | 7.038 | 7.791 | 8.316 | 9.134 | 10.910 | 13.387 | 15.327 | 17.090 | 20.893 | 24.719 |
13 | 463 | -0.749 | 10.399 | 0.263 | 6.256 | 6.713 | 7.430 | 7.929 | 8.707 | 10.394 | 12.744 | 14.583 | 16.253 | 19.851 | 23.466 |
14 | 469 | -0.749 | 10.101 | 0.270 | 6.013 | 6.460 | 7.164 | 7.655 | 8.422 | 10.096 | 12.446 | 14.299 | 15.993 | 19.672 | 23.404 |
15 | 399 | -0.749 | 9.997 | 0.282 | 5.833 | 6.282 | 6.990 | 7.488 | 8.269 | 9.990 | 12.446 | 14.410 | 16.227 | 20.235 | 24.377 |
16 | 414 | -0.749 | 10.062 | 0.298 | 5.728 | 6.186 | 6.914 | 7.428 | 8.240 | 10.053 | 12.689 | 14.838 | 16.854 | 21.392 | 26.190 |
17 | 421 | -0.749 | 10.226 | 0.311 | 5.706 | 6.176 | 6.926 | 7.459 | 8.306 | 10.213 | 13.032 | 15.366 | 17.582 | 22.651 | 28.113 |
18 | 328 | -0.749 | 10.436 | 0.318 | 5.761 | 6.242 | 7.014 | 7.563 | 8.439 | 10.422 | 13.378 | 15.846 | 18.204 | 23.648 | 29.573 |
All girls | 3784 | 6.000 | 6.903 | 7.018 | 8.000 | 8.999 | 10.843 | 13.011 | 15.199 | 17.497 | 22.375 | 26.793 | |||
AST/ALT ratio in boys | |||||||||||||||
10 | 477 | 0.572 | 1.589 | 0.313 | 0.674 | 0.789 | 0.964 | 1.082 | 1.256 | 1.590 | 1.956 | 2.178 | 2.344 | 2.618 | 2.821 |
11 | 516 | 0.572 | 1.556 | 0.307 | 0.674 | 0.785 | 0.954 | 1.068 | 1.235 | 1.556 | 1.908 | 2.121 | 2.279 | 2.542 | 2.735 |
12 | 524 | 0.572 | 1.524 | 0.302 | 0.671 | 0.779 | 0.943 | 1.053 | 1.214 | 1.524 | 1.862 | 2.067 | 2.219 | 2.472 | 2.658 |
13 | 543 | 0.572 | 1.489 | 0.300 | 0.661 | 0.766 | 0.925 | 1.032 | 1.189 | 1.489 | 1.817 | 2.015 | 2.163 | 2.407 | 2.587 |
14 | 524 | 0.572 | 1.443 | 0.301 | 0.637 | 0.739 | 0.894 | 0.998 | 1.150 | 1.443 | 1.763 | 1.956 | 2.100 | 2.339 | 2.514 |
15 | 480 | 0.572 | 1.383 | 0.308 | 0.598 | 0.697 | 0.848 | 0.949 | 1.098 | 1.383 | 1.697 | 1.887 | 2.028 | 2.262 | 2.434 |
16 | 421 | 0.572 | 1.315 | 0.317 | 0.550 | 0.645 | 0.792 | 0.890 | 1.035 | 1.315 | 1.622 | 1.809 | 1.947 | 2.178 | 2.348 |
17 | 427 | 0.572 | 1.245 | 0.329 | 0.499 | 0.591 | 0.733 | 0.829 | 0.971 | 1.246 | 1.549 | 1.733 | 1.870 | 2.098 | 2.267 |
18 | 395 | 0.572 | 1.180 | 0.344 | 0.448 | 0.537 | 0.676 | 0.769 | 0.909 | 1.180 | 1.481 | 1.664 | 1.801 | 2.029 | 2.197 |
All boys | 4,307 | 0.553 | 0.627 | 0.781 | 0.909 | 1.080 | 1.415 | 1.745 | 1.913 | 2.069 | 2.268 | 2.447 | |||
AST/ALT ratio in girls | |||||||||||||||
10 | 415 | 0.513 | 1.717 | 0.277 | 0.800 | 0.922 | 1.103 | 1.222 | 1.394 | 1.717 | 2.073 | 2.294 | 2.462 | 2.750 | 2.970 |
11 | 444 | 0.513 | 1.684 | 0.253 | 0.848 | 0.962 | 1.128 | 1.237 | 1.393 | 1.684 | 2.002 | 2.199 | 2.348 | 2.602 | 2.795 |
12 | 431 | 0.513 | 1.651 | 0.239 | 0.870 | 0.977 | 1.134 | 1.235 | 1.381 | 1.651 | 1.945 | 2.126 | 2.262 | 2.496 | 2.673 |
13 | 463 | 0.513 | 1.618 | 0.237 | 0.858 | 0.962 | 1.115 | 1.213 | 1.355 | 1.618 | 1.904 | 2.079 | 2.212 | 2.439 | 2.611 |
14 | 469 | 0.513 | 1.585 | 0.241 | 0.831 | 0.934 | 1.085 | 1.183 | 1.324 | 1.585 | 1.870 | 2.044 | 2.177 | 2.402 | 2.574 |
15 | 399 | 0.513 | 1.552 | 0.246 | 0.800 | 0.902 | 1.053 | 1.150 | 1.291 | 1.552 | 1.837 | 2.013 | 2.145 | 2.372 | 2.545 |
16 | 414 | 0.513 | 1.519 | 0.253 | 0.765 | 0.867 | 1.018 | 1.115 | 1.256 | 1.519 | 1.806 | 1.983 | 2.118 | 2.347 | 2.522 |
17 | 421 | 0.513 | 1.486 | 0.257 | 0.740 | 0.841 | 0.990 | 1.086 | 1.226 | 1.486 | 1.771 | 1.947 | 2.081 | 2.309 | 2.483 |
18 | 328 | 0.513 | 1.453 | 0.253 | 0.733 | 0.831 | 0.974 | 1.068 | 1.202 | 1.453 | 1.728 | 1.897 | 2.025 | 2.244 | 2.411 |
All girls | 3784 | 0.767 | 0.885 | 1.047 | 1.152 | 1.303 | 1.576 | 1.876 | 2.001 | 2.159 | 2.392 | 2.603 | |||
AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase |
3. Comparison of adjusted mean values of cardiometabolic risk factors according to AST, ALT, and the AST/ALT ratio
We compared the mean values of cardiometabolic risk factors, namely, WC, systolic/diastolic BP, glucose, T-C, TG, HDL-C and LDL-C stratified into normal (< 75th percentile), borderline-high (75th ≥ and < 95th percentile) and high (≥ 95th percentile) groups for AST and ALT and normal (>25th percentile), borderline-high (>5th and ≤25th percentile) and high (≤5th percentile) groups for the AST/ALT ratio. The upper limits of normal for boys and girls were estimated to be AST values of 23 and 20 IU/L, ALT values of 19 and 14 IU/L, and the AST/ALT ratios of 0.65 and 0.90, respectively.
The influences of AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio on cardiometabolic risk factors are summarized in Table 3. After adjustment for potential confounders, a comparison revealed that the adjusted mean values of T-C, TG, HDL-C and, LDL-C were significantly higher in the borderline-high AST group than in the normal group. ALT levels were associated not only with lipid profiles but also with WC and BP. In the analysis of the AST/ALT ratio on cardiometabolic risk factors, the borderline-high group had a higher WC SDS, systolic BP, T-C, TG, HDL-C and LDL-C than the normal group. Moreover, the high AST/ALT ratio group had a higher WC SDS, diastolic BP, glucose, T-C, TG, HDL-C and LDL-C than the normal group, in which diastolic BP, glucose, T-C, TG and LDL-C were significantly higher than those in the borderline-high group.
Groups according to AST level | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boys | Girls | ||||||
Normal | Borderline high | High | Normal | Borderline high | High | ||
Waist circumference (cm)1 | -0.31 ± 0.02 | -0.22 ± 0.04 | 0.67 ± 0.08b,c | -0.15 ± 0.02 | -0.37 ± 0.04a | -0.03 ± 0.08c | |
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)2 | 108.74 ± 0.17 | 109.07 ± 0.32 | 108.43 ± 0.65 | 104.28 ± 0.17 | 103.88 ± 0.34 | 104.46 ± 0.67 | |
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)2 | 66.38 ± 0.16 | 66.32 ± 0.30 | 66.72 ± 0.61 | 65.67 ± 0.15 | 65.20 ± 0.30 | 65.44 ± 0.60 | |
Glucose (mg/dL)2 | 90.93 ± 0.14 | 90.45 ± 0.26 | 91.03 ± 0.53 | 89.45 ± 0.17 | 88.97 ± 0.33 | 91.10 ± 0.66c | |
T-C (mg/dL)2 | 153.10 ± 0.46 | 162.29 ± 0.86a | 167.59 ± 1.77b,c | 161.42 ± 0.50 | 171.22 ± 0.98a | 170.06 ± 1.94b | |
TG (mg/dL)2 | 81.11 ± 0.81 | 85.99 ± 1.52a | 98.58 ± 3.12b,c | 85.02 ± 0.82 | 90.45 ± 1.62a | 94.46 ± 3.21b | |
HDL-C (mg/dL)2 | 49.27 ± 0.17 | 51.73 ± 0.32a | 50.51 ± 0.64 | 51.95 ± 0.19 | 52.99 ± 0.36a | 53.18 ± 0.72 | |
LDL-C (mg/dL)2 | 87.66 ± 0.40 | 93.37 ± 0.75a | 97.36 ± 1.54b | 92.50 ± 0.43 | 99.96 ± 0.86 | 98.14 ± 0.69 | |
Groups according to ALT level | |||||||
Waist circumference (cm)1 | -0.51 ± 0.02 | 0.39 ± 0.04a | 1.26 ± 0.07b,c | -0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.04a | 0.80 ± 0.08b,c | |
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)2 | 108.63 ± 0.17 | 109.40 ± 0.34 | 108.91 ± 0.68 | 104.17 ± 0.17 | 104.22 ± 0.34 | 104.71 ± 0.67 | |
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)2 | 66.09 ± 0.16 | 67.11 ± 0.32a | 67.94 ± 0.65b | 65.52 ± 0.15 | 65.42 ± 0.31 | 66.80 ± 0.60 | |
Glucose (mg/dL)2 | 90.92 ± 0.14 | 90.19 ± 0.27 | 92.17 ± 0.55c | 89.30 ± 0.17 | 89.57 ± 0.34 | 90.97 ± 0.67b | |
T-C (mg/dL)2 | 153.13 ± 0.46 | 162.67 ± 0.92a | 169.61 ± 1.87b,c | 162.04 ± 0.49 | 169.05 ± 0.99a | 171.91 ± 1.96b | |
TG (mg/dL)2 | 78.96 ± 0.80 | 92.93 ± 1.61a | 106.45 ± 3.26b,c | 83.36 ± 0.80 | 95.32 ± 1.63a | 103.67 ± 3.21b | |
HDL-C (mg/dL)2 | 49.71 ± 0.17 | 50.44 ± 0.34 | 49.84 ± 0.68 | 52.47 ± 0.18 | 51.41 ± 0.37a | 51.32 ± 0.73 | |
LDL-C (mg/dL)2 | 87.68 ± 0.40 | 93.66 ± 0.80a | 98.51 ± 1.62b,c | 92.86 ± 0.42 | 98.60 ± 0.87a | 100.08 ± 1.72b | |
Groups according to ALT to AST ratio | |||||||
Waist circumference (cm)1 | -0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.03a | 1.11 ± 0.06b,c | -0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.03a | 1.00 ± 0.07b,c | |
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)2 | 108.69 ± 0.17 | 109.19 ± 0.34 | 108.72 ± 0.64 | 104.03 ± 0.18 | 104.47 ± 0.31 | 105.39 ± 0.66 | |
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)2 | 66.12 ± 0.16 | 66.68 ± 0.32 | 68.72 ± 0.60b,c | 65.41 ± 0.16 | 65.62 ± 0.27 | 67.30 ± 0.59b,c | |
Glucose (mg/dL)2 | 90.83 ± 0.14 | 90.72 ± 0.27 | 91.29 ± 0.51 | 89.24 ± 0.18 | 89.70 ± 0.30 | 90.77 ± 0.65 | |
T-C (mg/dL)2 | 153.38 ± 0.47 | 160.68 ± 0.93a | 170.11 ± 1.75b,c | 162.53 ± 0.52 | 166.53 ± 0.90a | 168.82 ± 1.92b | |
TG (mg/dL)2 | 77.82 ± 0.82 | 96.38 ± 1.61a | 103.50 ± 3.03b | 83.40 ± 0.85 | 93.39 ± 1.47a | 98.13 ± 3.14b | |
HDL-C (mg/dL)2 | 50.07 ± 0.17 | 49.28 ± 0.34 | 49.14 ± 0.64 | 52.45 ± 0.19 | 51.92 ± 0.33a | 50.41 ± 0.71 | |
LDL-C (mg/dL)2 | 87.79 ± 0.41 | 92.10 ± 0.81a | 100.31 ± 1.51b,c | 93.35 ± 0.45 | 95.94 ± 0.78a | 99.07 ± 1.68b | |
The results are expressed as the mean ± standard error (SE) | |||||||
WC, waist circumference; SDS, standard deviation score; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; T-C, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. | |||||||
The normal group was classified as i) aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels < 23 IU/L in boys, and < 20 IU/L in girls, ii) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level < 19 IU/L in boys, and < 14 IU/L in girls, and iii) AST/ALT ratio > 1.10 in boys, and > 1.35 in girls. | |||||||
The borderline-high group was classified as i) AST level ≥ 23 IU/L and 32 < IU/L in boys, and ≥ 20 IU/L and 26 < IU/L in girls, ii) ALT level ≥ 19 IU/L and < 40 IU/L in boys, and ≥ 14 IU/L and < 23 IU/L in girls, and iii) AST/ALT ratio < 0.65 and ≤ 1.10 in boys, and < 0.90 and ≤ 1.35 in girls. | |||||||
The high group was classified as i) AST level ≥ 32 IU/L in boys, and ≥ 26 IU/L in girls, ii) ALT level ≥ 40 IU/L in boys, and ≥ 23 IU/L in girls, and iii) AST /ALT ratio ≤ 0.65 in boys, and ≤ 0.90 in girls. | |||||||
Model 1: The adjusted means of waist circumference (WC) were estimated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test after adjustment for age, alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, residence, household income, and diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia in the respective sex according to groups for AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio. | |||||||
Model 2: The adjusted means of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), glucose, total cholesterol (T-C), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were estimated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test after adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI) standard deviation score (SDS), alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, residence, household income, and diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia in the respective sexes according to groups for AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio. | |||||||
a: The difference was estimated between the normal group and the borderline-high group using analysis of covariance with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. | |||||||
b: The difference was estimated between the normal group and the high group using analysis of covariance with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. | |||||||
c: The difference was estimated between the borderline-high group and the high group using analysis of covariance with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. |
The prevalence of MetS was significantly increased in the overweight and obese groups as the AST level increased but not in the normal weight group. In particular, the difference was significant between the borderline-high and high groups rather than between the normal group and the borderline-high group. Although there was a sex difference regarding the OR for some detailed components, there was no significant difference in the contribution to the overall risk increase between boys and girls. An increase in the prevalence of MetS was similarly observed in the overweight and obesity groups as ALT levels increased (Fig. 3-A). The number of components of MetS, especially more than two components, also increased as AST increased in the overweight and obesity groups (Fig. 4-A). In contrast to the AST analysis results, the prevalence of MetS increased even in the borderline-high group compared to the normal group as the ALT level increased (Fig. 3-B). In the analysis of the number of components of MetS, the presence of more than one component increased as ALT increased in the normal, overweight and obese groups (Fig. 4-B). The analysis of the AST/ALT ratio also demonstrated that the prevalence of MetS increased as the AST/ALT level decreased in the overweight and obesity groups; in contrast to the ALT values, the differences among the normal, borderline-high, and high groups were more clearly observed in the AST/ALT values (Fig. 3-C). Moreover, analysis of the number of components of MetS also clearly demonstrated that more than one component increased as the AST/ALT ratio increase not only in the overweight and obesity group, but also in the normal group (Fig. 4-C).
The adjusted ORs for MetS and its components increased as AST and ALT increased and the AST/ALT ratio deceased, which is summarized in Table 4. Adjusted ORs for elevated glucose, elevated TG and MetS were increased for subjects with a high level of AST, respectively. Moreover, adjusted ORs for all analyzed metabolic components were considerably increased in subjects with a high level of ALT. A decreased AST/ALT ratio was most closely associated with an increased risk of MetS. In addition, the combination of high ALT and a low AST/ALT was also associated with an increased risk of elevated WC, elevated BP, elevated glucose, elevated TG, reduced HDL-C and MetS, which is summarized in Table 5.
Groups according to AST level | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All participants | Boys | Girls | |||||||||
Normal | Borderline high | High | Normal | Borderline high | High | Normal | Borderline high | High | |||
Elevated WC1 | Reference | 1.51 (1.25–1.83) | 4.55 (3.55–5.83) | Reference | 1.94 (1.52–2.55) | 7.12(5.15–9.84) | Reference | 1.13 (0.84–1.52) | 2.76 (1.86–4.12) | ||
Elevated BP2 | Reference | 1.05 (0.93–1.19) | 1.01 (0.81–1.27) | Reference | 1.07 (0.91–1.27) | 0.98 (0.72–1.34) | Reference | 0.99 (0.82–1.20) | 0.93 (0.66–1.31) | ||
Elevated glucose2 | Reference | 1.42 (0.80–2.51) | 3.71 (1.93–7.15) | Reference | 1.30 (0.62–2.70) | 2.84 (1.11–7.22) | Reference | 1.60 (0.63–4.04) | 5.40 (2.11–13.84) | ||
Elevated TG2 | Reference | 1.25 (1.09–1.43) | 1.70 (1.35–2.13) | Reference | 1.18 (0.97–1.43) | 1.62 (1.18–2.21) | Reference | 1.26 (1.03–1.54) | 1.59 (1.14–2.23) | ||
Reduced HDL-C2 | Reference | 0.86 (0.72–1.04) | 0.97 (0.73–1.31) | Reference | 0.73 (0.58–0.93) | 0.87 (0.60–1.27) | Reference | 1.12 (0.84–1.49) | 1.13 (0.70–1.84) | ||
MetS2 | Reference | 1.31 (0.98–1.75) | 2.08 (1.44–3.01) | Reference | 1.33 (0.93–1.92) | 1.66 (1.03–2.67) | Reference | 1.22 (0.73–2.02) | 3.32 (1.83–6.02) | ||
Groups according to ALT level | |||||||||||
Elevated WC3 | Reference | 5.26 (4.42–6.26) | 14.64 (11.59–18.51) | Reference | 8.68 (6.69–11.27) | 27.30 (19.42–38.39) | Reference | 3.51 (2.74–4.49) | 8.94 (6.37–12.53) | ||
Elevated BP4 | Reference | 1.21 (1.07–1.37) | 1.57 (1.26–1.96) | Reference | 1.30 (1.09–1.54) | 1.41 (1.03–1.93) | Reference | 1.02 (0.85–1.23) | 1.60 (1.16–2.19) | ||
Elevated glucose4 | Reference | 1.06 (0.58–1.95) | 2.97 (1.46–6.04) | Reference | 0.87 (0.37–2.04) | 2.47 (0.89–6.91) | Reference | 1.55 (0.64–3.78) | 3.87 (1.41–10.66) | ||
Elevated TG4 | Reference | 1.66 (1.45–1.90) | 2.37 (1.89–2.97) | Reference | 1.68 (1.39–2.03) | 2.45 (1.78–3.37) | Reference | 1.53 (1.26–1.86) | 2.09 (1.50–2.89) | ||
Reduced HDL-C4 | Reference | 1.21 (1.02–1.43) | 1.45 (1.11–1.89) | Reference | 0.97 (0.78–1.21) | 1.09 (0.76–1.56) | Reference | 1.57 (1.21–2.04) | 1.93 (1.29–2.89) | ||
MetS4 | Reference | 2.32 (1.76–3.06) | 3.63 (2.57–5.12) | Reference | 2.12 (1.48–3.04) | 3.09 (1.95–4.88) | Reference | 2.48 (1.60–3.84) | 4.31 (2.52–7.36) | ||
Groups according to AST to ALT ratio | |||||||||||
Elevated WC3 | Reference | 7.48 (6.24-9.00) | 22.52 (17.73–28.62) | Reference | 11.55 (8.73–15.28) | 34.44 (24.31–48.80) | Reference | 5.18 (4.03–6.65) | 15.89 (11.32–22.30) | ||
Elevated BP4 | Reference | 1.17 (1.04–1.33) | 1.76 (1.42–2.17) | Reference | 1.29 (1.09–1.54) | 1.68 (1.25–2.25) | Reference | 1.01 (0.85–1.21) | 1.72 (1.26–2.35) | ||
Elevated glucose4 | Reference | 0.90 (0.48–1.66) | 2.23 (1.06–4.71) | Reference | 0.75 (0.31–1.81) | 1.76 (0.61–5.10) | Reference | 1.20 (0.50–2.90) | 3.05 (1.02–9.12) | ||
Elevated TG4 | Reference | 1.79 (1.56–2.04) | 2.09 (1.67–2.62) | Reference | 2.00 (1.65–2.43) | 2.38 (1.75–3.24) | Reference | 1.55 (1.28–1.87) | 1.72 (1.22–2.41) | ||
Reduced HDL-C4 | Reference | 1.34 (1.14–1.58) | 1.58 (1.22–2.05) | Reference | 1.39 (1.12–1.72) | 1.29 (0.91–1.83) | Reference | 1.39 (1.12–1.72) | 1.29 (0.91–1.83) | ||
MetS4 | Reference | 2.96 (2.21–3.98) | 4.31 (2.98–6.23) | Reference | 3.29 (2.24–4.84) | 4.23 (2.61–6.85) | Reference | 2.44 (1.54–3.85) | 4.17 (2.33–7.45) | ||
AST, aspartate aminotransferase; WC, waist circumference; BP, blood pressure; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; ALT, alanine aminotransferase. | |||||||||||
The normal group was classified as i) aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level < 23 IU/L in boys, and < 20 IU/L in girls, ii) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level < 19 IU/L in boys, and < 14 IU/L in girls, and iii) AST/ALT ratio > 1.10 in boys, and > 1.35 in girls. | |||||||||||
The borderline-high group was classified as i) AST level ≥ 23 IU/L and 32 < IU/L in boys, and ≥ 20 IU/L and 26 < IU/L in girls, ii) ALT level ≥ 19 IU/L and < 40 IU/L in boys, and ≥ 14 IU/L and < 23 IU/L in girls, and iii) AST/ALT ratio level < 0.65 and ≤ 1.10 in boys, and < 0.90 and ≤ 1.35 in girls. | |||||||||||
The high group was classified as i) AST level ≥ 32 IU/L in boys, and ≥ 26 IU/L in girls, ii) ALT level ≥ 40 IU/L in boys, and ≥ 23 IU/L in girls, and iii) AST/ALT ratio ≤ 0.65 in boys, and ≤ 0.90 in girls. | |||||||||||
Model 1: The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components according to groups for AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio were determined using multiple logistic regression after adjustment for sex, age, alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, rural residence, household income, and diagnosis of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and dyslipidemia in all participants. | |||||||||||
Model 2: The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of MetS and its components according to groups for AST, ALT, and the AST/ALT ratio were determined using multiple logistic regression after adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI) standard deviation score (SDS), alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, rural residence, household income, and diagnosis of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and dyslipidemia in all participants. | |||||||||||
Model 3: The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of MetS and its components according to groups for AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio were determined using multiple logistic regression after adjustment for age, alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, rural residence, household income, and diagnosis of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and dyslipidemia in the respective sexes. | |||||||||||
Model 4: The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of MetS and its components according to groups for AST, ALT, and the AST/ALT ratio were determined using multiple logistic regression after adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI) standard deviation score (SDS), alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, rural residence, household income, and diagnosis of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and dyslipidemia in the respective sexes. |
Groups according to combination of ALT and the AST/ALT ratio | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All participants | Boys | Girls | |||||||||
Group 11 | Group 21 | Group 31 | Group 12 | Group 22 | Group 32 | Group 12 | Group 22 | Group 32 | |||
Elevated WC | Reference | 6.57 (5.43–7.95) | 20.45 (16.23–25.77) | Reference | 10.54 (7.84–14.16) | 35.75 (25.28–50.57) | Reference | 4.49 (3.48–5.79) | 13.17 (9.56–18.15) | ||
Elevated BP | Reference | 1.14 (1.02–1.29) | 1.67 (1.38–2.03) | Reference | 1.23 (1.04–1.45) | 1.66 (1.26–2.18) | Reference | 1.00 (0.85–1.18) | 1.53 (1.16–2.03) | ||
Elevated glucose | Reference | 0.99 (0.55–1.79) | 2.65 (1.33–5.27) | Reference | 0.74 (0.32–1.74) | 2.38 (0.91–6.23) | Reference | 1.53 (0.65–3.57) | 3.32 (1.16–9.46) | ||
Elevated TG | Reference | 1.71 (1.51–1.95) | 2.13 (1.74–2.62) | Reference | 1.74 (1.45–2.09) | 2.28 (1.71–3.04) | Reference | 1.61 (1.35–1.92) | 1.83 (1.35–2.47) | ||
Reduced HDL-C | Reference | 1.29 (1.10–1.51) | 1.51 (1.18–1.93) | Reference | 1.18 (0.96–1.46) | 1.21 (0.87–1.67) | Reference | 1.38 (1.08–1.78) | 1.86 (1.28–2.71) | ||
MetS | Reference | 2.74 (2.02–3.71) | 4.31 (3.00-6.19) | Reference | 2.73 (1.84–4.05) | 3.87 (2.41–6.23) | Reference | 2.62 (1.62–4.24) | 4.72 (2.66–8.35) | ||
WC, waist circumference; BP, blood pressure; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; ALT, alanine aminotransferase. | |||||||||||
Group 1 was classified as the normal group based on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and the normal group based on the AST/ALT ratio. | |||||||||||
Group 2 was classified as i) the borderline-high group based on ALT level and the normal group based on the AST/ALT ratio ii) i) the borderline-high group based on ALT level and the borderline-high group based on the AST/ALT ratio, and iii) normal group based on ALT levels and borderline high group based on the AST/ALT ratio. | |||||||||||
Group 3 was classified as i) the high group based on ALT level and normal, the borderline-high, or the high group based on the AST/ALT ratio ii) the high group based on the AST/ALT ratio and the normal, the borderline-high, or the high group based on ALT level. | |||||||||||
Model 1: The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components according to groups for the combination of ALT and the AST/ALT ratio were determined using multiple logistic regression after adjustment for sex, age, body mass index (BMI) standard deviation score (SDS), alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, rural residence, household income, and diagnosis of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and dyslipidemia in all participants. | |||||||||||
Model 2: The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of MetS and its components according to groups for the combination of the AST/ALT ratio were determined using multiple logistic regression after adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI) standard deviation score (SDS), alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, rural residence, household income, and diagnosis of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and dyslipidemia in the respective sexes. |
We found that clear differences in AST, ALT, and AST/ALT ratio curves between age- and sex- different subgroups; the AST levels tended to decrease as age, but the ALT curves were U-shaped, which resulted in trends of the AST/ALT ratio to reduce according to age and skewed to the left. In the cardiometabolic risk assessment based on our novel references, components of MetS significantly increased in high levels of AST, ALT, and AST/ALT ratio; some of the components were increased even in borderline high levels of liver enzymes in the analysis of ANCOVA with correction of age, sex, BMI, etc. Similarly, the odds ratio of metabolic risk factors also increased in the high AST, ALT, and the low AST/ALT ratio; some components of MetS were significantly increased even in borderline high levels.
In our findings, AST and ALT were higher in boys than in girls and differ over time; AST tended to decrease with age but ALT levels were U-shaped and increased with age. Those tendencies were consistent with previous reports in Korean subjects 18 and those of other ethnicities, for instance, an obvious increase in ALT levels was observed in male after the age of 11 years 17, and a sex difference with a continuous decrease in concentration from ages 2 to 14 years was observed for AST 9,17,20,21. Percentile distributions of the AST/ALT ratio showed sex differences across all observed ages in our data; the ratio was significantly higher in girls than in boys. Despite conflicts with the data of the HELENA study 10, our results were similar to those of a recent Chinese study 22, which seems to be due to ethnic or geographic differences.
Regarding on MetS, an increase in the prevalence of MetS according to AST, ALT, and the AST/ALT ratio was more clearly observed as BMI increased (Figs. 3 and 4). This result suggested that although a strong correlation between high levels of AST, ALT, and the AST/ALT ratio and most cardiometabolic risk factors exist, the interpretation of liver markers in children and adolescents could be adapted differentially depending on the differential BMI values. Previously, AST or AST/ALT ratios were known to indicate progression to diabetes 23. Similarly, in our findings, high serum AST, ALT, and the AST/ALT ratio were all associated with a high OR of elevated glucose (Table 4). These results strongly supported that a decreased AST/ALT ratio might effectively predict increased cardiometabolic risk, especially insulin resistance when high ALT exists. Of interest, our results showed that the associations of AST, ALT, and the AST/ALT ratio with cardiometabolic risk factors were significant both in boys and girls, which partially conflicts with a previous European study 10. The differential distribution of overweight or obese children in the study population might affect the analysis. In addition, differential body adiposity might also influence screening tests of liver markers. Therefore, detailed comparative studies on this point will be needed in future studies.
Based on the percentile distribution, we suggested that the upper limits of normal of AST, ALT and the AST/ALT ratio were 23 IU/L and 20 IU/L (< 75th percentile), 19 IU/L and 14 IU/L (< 75th percentile), and 1.1 and 1.35 (< 25 percentile) in boys and girls, respectively. Similar studies with non-overweight adolescents proposed sex-specific thresholds for ALT levels < 25 IU/L in males and < 22 IU/L in females to detect pediatric chronic liver disease 8. However, Labayen et al. suggested upper limits of normal for ALT of 24–25 (75th percentile) and 22–24 IU/L (75th percentile) and thresholds of the AST/ALT ratio associated with high cardiometabolic risk of 1.0-0.74 and 0.86–0.87 (ranging from 13-35th percentile) for boys and girls, respectively 10. In those studies, the estimated upper limits of normal of ALT in adolescents were higher than those in our report. This might be due to differences in ethnicities between the studies; other possibilities are differences in the proportion of subjects with obesity and severity of central adiposity levels. Although direct comparison of the AST/ALT ratio between our data and previous reports is difficult, it seems that stricter levels of the AST and ALT should be applied for Korean adolescents, especially for the overweight or obese subgroup for the precise estimation of cardiometabolic prognosis.
The main limitation of this study is the cross-sectional analysis, which cannot identify the temporal association of MetS with AST, ALT, and the AST/ALT ratio. A large population-based, longitudinal cohort study could address this limitation in the future by serial measurements of liver enzymes and follow-up for the occurrence of cardiometabolic events. The other limitation is that our data were from subjects of one ethnicity in a single country. Thus, comparisons and meta-analysis with other ethnic groups will be needed for the broad application of pediatric reference intervals. Despite of information about a family history of premature coronary heart disease, we could not exclude familial hyperlipidemia during subject selection due to limitations on laboratory tests. Combined familial hyperlipidemia frequently accompanies NAFLD in approximately 49–76% of cases 24, which implies that possible effects of these comorbidities were not completely excluded in our data. Other liver markers such as gamma-GT have also been suggested to be strong predictors of cardiovascular disease and T2DM in adults 25, and metabolic risks in adolescents 10; however, we did not analyze other possible markers in our current study.
In conclusion, we newly established reference values for AST, ALT, and the AST/ALT ratio based on the risk assessment of MetS components. High levels of AST and ALT and a low AST/ALT ratio were closely associated with the prevalence of MetS and its components. In particular, overweight and obese children and adolescents have a considerably higher prevalence of MetS and its components when liver enzymes exceed the upper limits of normal than do normal subjects. Both ALT and the AST/ALT ratio were effective in screening for metabolic risk in both sexes in a Korean population. Therefore, the age- and sex-specific reference values provided in this study may contribute to the early diagnosis and treatment of MetS.
ALT: Alanine aminotransferase
AST: Aspartate aminotransferase
BP: Blood pressure
BMI: Body mass index
CI: Confidence interval
HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol
KCDC: Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
KNHANES: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
MetS: Metabolic syndrome
NAFLD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
NCEP-ATP III: National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III
NCEP: National Cholesterol Education Program
ORs: Odds ratios
SDS: Standard deviation scores
T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus
TG: Triglyceride
TC: Total cholesterol
WC: Waist circumference
Author contributions
Seo Y-J designed the study, drafted the manuscript, and analyzed the publicly available data set. Lee HS and Hwang JS reviewed and revised the manuscript and provided important intellectual content, including conceptualization of the study design. Shim YS supervised all aspects of manuscript preparation and assisted with the study formulation, data analysis, manuscript writing, and interpretation of the findings. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest are declared.
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in [the KNHANES website] at [https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr]. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [Shim YS], upon reasonable request.