Sample characteristics in adolescent depression patients with or without suicidal ideation by sex
Table 1 shows the demographic data and clinical data of all subjects by gender. A total of 1635 patients (748 males/ 887 females) with adolescent depression were enrolled in this study, including 625 (38.23%) with suicidal ideation, and the female was significantly higher than the male (43.18% vs. 32.35%, P<0.001).
Table 1
Comparison of demographic and clinical variables in adolescent depression patients with or without suicidal ideation (between sex)
| Without SI | With SI | SI F | Sex F | SI×Sex F |
Male(n = 506) | Female(n = 504) | Male(n = 242) | Female(n = 383) | (P-value) | (P-value) | (P-value) |
Age (years) | 14.56 ± 1.71** | 14.88 ± 2.02 | 14.85 ± 1.87+ | 15.02 ± 1.83 | 8.563(0.210) | 10.740(0.189) | 0.579(0.447) |
Education (years) | 7.81 ± 1.57** | 8.24 ± 1.79 | 8.04 ± 1.60 | 8.29 ± 1.67 | 2.460(0.361) | 14.300(0.165) | 1.084(0.298) |
Residence, City | 391/77.3% | 354/70.2% | 186/76.9% | 282/73.6% | 0.613(0.577) | 7.280(0.226) | 0.708(0.400) |
Onlychild, Yes | 415/82.0% | 354/70.2% | 187/77.3%* | 268/70.0% | 1.250(0.465) | 18.141(0.147) | 1.009(0.315) |
Family depression history, Yes | 11/2.2% | 6/1.2% | 7/2.9% | 18/4.7%++ | 2.295(0.371) | 0.087(0.817) | 2.920(0.088) |
Key school, Yes | 186/36.8% | 179/35.5% | 73/30.2% | 128/33.4% | 3.732(0.304) | 0.200(0.732) | 0.835(0.361) |
Leader, Yes | 157/31.0% | 233/46.2% | 81/33.5% | 143/37.3%++ | 0.324(0.671) | 2.829(0.341) | 5.194(0.023) |
Sleep less than 8 hours | 264/52.2% | 251/49.8% | 137/56.6%* | 251/65.5%++ | 3.189(0.325) | 0.336(0.665) | 4.883(0.027) |
CDI Total Score | 26.01 ± 2.69 | 26.08 ± 2.60 | 26.86 ± 3.18++ | 27.02 ± 3.22++ | 54.855(0.085) | 2.322(0.370) | 0.797(0.372) |
ASLEC Total Score | 57.94 ± 21.07 | 56.01 ± 21.81 | 72.14 ± 23.77++ | 70.90 ± 23.79++ | 1762.063(0.015) | 20.953(0.137) | 0.090(0.765) |
ASLEC Relationship Score | 12.86 ± 4.73 | 12.66 ± 4.96 | 15.84 ± 5.54++ | 16.37 ± 5.67++ | 84.626(0.069) | 0.205(0.729) | 1.855(0.173) |
ASLEC Learn pressure Score | 11.99 ± 4.30 | 11.77 ± 4.18 | 14.53 ± 4.86++ | 14.19 ± 4.85++ | 1584.920(0.016) | 19.999(0.140) | 0.072(0.788) |
ASLEC Punishment Score | 14.40 ± 6.67* | 13.37 ± 6.96 | 18.23 ± 7.62++ | 17.24 ± 8.11++ | 51986.589(0.003) | 3610.233(0.011) | 0.002(0.964) |
ASLEC Deprived Score | 6.51 ± 4.14 | 6.51 ± 4.23 | 7.92 ± 4.70++ | 7.94 ± 4.59++ | 25491.249(0.004) | 0.611(0.578) | 0.002(0.969) |
ASLEC Health Score | 6.65 ± 3.14 | 6.60 ± 3.00 | 7.93 ± 3.64++ | 7.97 ± 3.45++ | 913.840(0.021) | 0.028(0.894) | 0.067(0.795) |
ASLEC Others Score | 7.71 ± 3.61** | 6.87 ± 3.45 | 10.52 ± 3.97**++ | 9.50 ± 4.33++ | 937.801(0.021) | 109.721(0.061) | 0.204(0.652) |
Note: * indicates the comparison between males and females with or without SI: *P<0.05, **P<0.01. |
+ indicates the comparison between SI and without SI group in males or females : +P<0.05, ++P<0.01. |
CDI score: delete the 9 item from the CDI total score |
SI: Suicidal ideation; ASLEC: Adolescent self-rating life event checklist; CDI: Children's Depression Inventory |
In the group with suicidal ideation, female patients had less sleeping, more male patients in the family with only-child, and male patients had higher others of ASLEC than female patients. In the group without suicidal ideation, male patients had younger age, lower education, a higher score on punishment score of ASLEC than female patients (all P<0.05).
For genders, as can be seen in the males' group with and without suicidal ideation, male patients with suicidal ideation had older age, more CDI total score, more ASLEC total score, and all six indexes score. For female patients, except for higher CDI total score and ASLEC total and all subindex scores as males, female patients with suicidal ideation had more positive family depression history, less be the school leader, and less sleeping.
Moreover, there were no significant diagnosis differences (depression patients with suicidal ideation vs. without suicidal ideation) in the demographic characteristics. ASLEC total and subscore except relationship score had significant differences in the group with or without suicidal ideation (all P<0.05). There was a significant gender difference in the punishment score of ASLEC (P = 0.011). Furthermore, there was significant interaction in the leader (P = 0.023) and less sleeping (P = 0.027) between suicidal ideation and sex.
Sex Differences In The Associations Between Suicidal Ideation And Clinical Variables In Adolescent Patients Groups
For all patients, suicidal ideation was correlated with age (r = 0.061, df = 1635, P = 0.013), education (r = 0.049, df = 1635, P = 0.047), famliy depression histroy (r=-0.071, df = 1635, P = 0.004), less sleeping (r = 0.108, df = 1635, P = 0.000), CDI total score (r = 0.170, df = 1635, P = 0.000), ASLEC total score (r = 0.299, df = 1635, P = 0.000), Relationship score (r = 0.305, df = 1635, P = 0.000), Learn pressure score (r = 0.256, df = 1635, P = 0.000), Punishment score (r = 0.242, df = 1635, P = 0.000), Deprived score (r = 0.157, df = 1635, P = 0.000), Health score (r = 0.194, df = 1635, P = 0.000), Others (r = 0.314, df = 1635, P = 0.000).
Table 2 showed separately sex differences in clinical characteristics associated with suicidal ideation. In male subjects, suicidal ideation was positive related to the following characteristics: CDI total score (r = 0.126, df = 748, P = 0.001), ASLEC total score (r = 0.297, df = 748, P = 0.000), Relationship score (r = 0.251, df = 748, P = 0.000), Learn pressure score (r = 0.260, df = 748, P = 0.000), Punishment score (r = 0.251, df = 748, P = 0.000), Deprived score (r = 0.159, df = 748, P = 0.000), Health score (r = 0.206, df = 748, P = 0.000), Others (r = 0.345, df = 748, P = 0.000). Further logistic regression analyses indicated that suicidal ideation was significantly associated with CDI total score (beta = 1.127, t = 0.029, P = 0.000), Relationship score (beta = 1.044, t = 0.020, P = 0.032), Others (beta = 1.171, t = 0.027, P = 0.000), as independent contributors to suicidal ideation in adolescent patients, which together accounted for 18.3% of the variance in suicidal ideation, see in Table 3.
Table 2
Correlation between suicidal ideation and clinical variables in male and female adolescent patients with depression
| Male | Female |
Age (years) | 0.069(0.057) | 0.037(0.272) |
Education (years) | 0.071(0.053) | 0.026(0.440) |
Family Depression history | -0.022(0.549) | -0.107(0.001) |
Key school | 0.065(0.076) | 0.022(0.516) |
Leader | 0.025(0.503) | -0.089(0.008) |
Sleep less than 8 hours | 0.042(0.255) | 0.157(0.000) |
CDI Total Score | 0.126(0.001) | 0.190(0.000) |
ASLEC Total Score | 0.297(0.000) | 0.339(0.000) |
ASLEC Relationship Score | 0.251(0.000) | 0.323(0.000) |
ASLEC Learn pressure Score | 0.260(0.000) | 0.253(0.000) |
ASLEC Punishment Score | 0.251(0.000) | 0.269(0.000) |
ASLEC Deprived Score | 0.159(0.000) | 0.178(0.000) |
ASLEC Health Score | 0.206(0.000) | 0.231(0.000) |
ASLEC Others Score | 0.345(0.000) | 0.351(0.000) |
Note: CDI score:delete the 9 item from the CDI total score |
ASLEC: Adolescent self-rating life event checklist; CDI: Children's Depression Inventory |
Table 3
Logistic regression analyses in suicidal ideation among male adolescent patients with depression
| Coefficients B | Std.error | Wald | P-value | | 95% confidence interval for EXP(B) |
| Exp(B) | Lower | Upper |
(constant) CDI Total Score | -5.927 0.119 | 0.835 0.029 | 50.412 16.718 | 0.000 0.000 | | 0.003 1.127 | 1.064 | 1.193 |
ASLEC Relationship Score | 0.043 | 0.020 | 4.578 | 0.032 | | 1.044 | 1.004 | 1.087 |
ASLEC Others Score | 0.158 | 0.027 | 34.893 | 0.000 | | 1.171 | 1.111 | 1.234 |
Note: CDI score:delete the 9 item from the CDI total score |
ASLEC: Adolescent self-rating life event checklist; CDI: Children's Depression Inventory |
In female subjects, suicidal ideation was positive related to the following characteristics: less sleeping (r = 0.157, df = 887, P = 0.000), CDI total score (r = 0.190, df = 887, P = 0.001), ASLEC total score (r = 0.339, df = 887, P = 0.000), Relationship score (r = 0.323, df = 887, P = 0.000), Learn pressure score (r = 0.253, df = 887, P = 0.000), Punishment score (r = 0.269, df = 887, P = 0.000), Deprived score (r = 0.178, df = 887, P = 0.000), Health score (r = 0.231, df = 887, P = 0.000), Others (r = 0.351, df = 887, P = 0.000). Family depression histroy (r=-0.107, df = 887, P = 0.001) and Leader (r=-0.089, df = 887, P = 0.008) were negative related to the suicidal ideation, see in Table 2. As shown in Table 4 in female patients, family depression histroy (beta = 0.328, t = 0.502, P = 0.027), less sleeping (beta = 1.614, t = 0.152, P = 0.002), CDI total score (beta = 1.146, t = 0.027, P = 0.000), Relationship score (beta = 1.079, t = 0.017, P = 0.000), Others (beta = 1.112, t = 0.024, P = 0.000) were found to be independent contributors to suicidal ideation, which accounted for 22.8% of the variance in suicidal ideation.
Table 4
Logistic regression analyses in in suicidal ideation among female adolescent patients with depression
| Coefficients B | Std.error | Wald | P-value | 95% confidence interval for EXP(B) |
Exp(B) | Lower | Upper |
(constant) Family depression history Sleep less than 8 hours CDI Total Score ASLEC Relationship Score ASLEC Others Score | -3.929 -1.114 0.479 0.136 0.076 0.107 | 1.248 0.502 0.152 0.027 0.017 0.024 | 9.907 4.923 9.869 26.168 19.304 19.312 | 0.002 0.027 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 | 0.020 0.328 1.614 1.146 1.079 1.112 | 0.123 1.197 1.088 1.043 1.061 | 0.878 2.176 1.208 1.116 1.167 |
Note: CDI score:delete the 9 item from the CDI total score |
ASLEC: Adolescent self-rating life event checklist; CDI: Children's Depression Inventory |