Materials
Octyltrichlorosilane (C8) was obtained from SigmaAldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Hexane was from Pharmco-Aaper (Brookfield, CT, USA). All chemicals were used as received. The raw date palm fiber (Phoenix dactylifera) meshes were collected from the Abu Dhabi Campus from Abu Dhabi, UAE (Fig. 1A). Date palm meshes were removed from the stem and sealed in polyethylene bags until the experiments were conducted (Fig. 1B). These DPF meshes were manually separated into single fibers and washed with distilled water to remove dust particles, sand and impurities. Cleaned fibers were dry for 24 hours at room temperature.
Measurements and characterization
Thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA)
TGA was performed to identify the degradation characteristics of the C8 treated fiber with the raw DPF. Hereafter, the grafted amount of C8 on the treated DPF was quantified using a TA Instruments, Model SDT 650 Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The treated DPF and raw DPF samples were heated from 20 to 900°C with a heating rate of 20°C/min in high purity nitrogen gas.
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy
FTIR spectra were taken using a Perkin Elmer Frontier FTIR spectrometer (PerkinElmer Genetics Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The scanning range was from 600 to 4000 cm− 1 with a spectral resolution of 4 cm− 1 and 32 scans.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
The surface morphology was carried out by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using FEG Quanta 250 (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) instrument of the raw and C8 treated DPFs under high vacuum mode operated at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV a working distance of about 10 mm. For SEM studies, each sample was attached to double-sided carbon adhesive tape on the top of an aluminum stud. The samples were then made conductive by the sputtering of Au/Pd.
Contact angle analysis
For contact angle measurements, the raw and C8 treated DPF samples were prepared on a glass slide by placing fibers close to each other with the help of double-sided sticky tape, as shown in Fig. 2. Water contact angle measurements were then performed using the static drop method at room temperature using KRÜSS DSA25 Series (KRÜSS Scientific Instruments, Inc., Matthews, NC, USA). Deionized water was used as a probe liquid (0.3 µl dispense volume) at a frequency of 20 in a time interval of 3000 milliseconds. Ten images from different locations on the surface were taken for each sample, with the average reported for the contact angle.
X-ray diffraction (XRD)
Diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected using X’Pert PRO powder diffractometer (Cu-Ka radiation 1.5406 Å, 45 kV, 40mA) in the range of 5–80°, 2θ scale. The empirical method was used to obtain the crystallinity index (CI) of the samples [16], as shown in Eq. (1):
$$CI=\left(\frac{{I}_{cr}-{I}_{am}}{{I}_{cr}}\right)*100 \left(1\right)$$
where Icr, and Iam represent the crystalline intensity and amorphous intensity at an angle (2θ). Icr is the crystalline peak corresponding to the intensity of approximately 23° and Iam is the amorphous peak corresponding to the intensity of approximately 19°.