Although MP infection shows typically self-limited course even without antibiotics, macrolides are still recommended as the first-line therapeutics for treating MP infection. However, a steadily increasing number of recent cases progress to refractory, severe, life-threatening MP pneumonia [1, 2]. Extensive use and misuse of macrolides may cause the rapid emergence of macrolide resistance [15]. Macrolides inhibit protein synthesis by binding to specific nucleotides of the 23S RNA in the 50S MP ribosomal subunit. Mutations at domain V of 23S RNA reduce the affinity of the macrolides for the ribosome, which develop macrolide resistance [6–9]. Since 2000, some studies have confirmed that this microbiological problem is increasing throughout the world, although the highest prevalence has been observed in East Asia. The published rate was reported to be 87.2% in Korea, 81.6% in Japan, and up to 90% in China [6, 13]. Consistent with previous studies, we found that 92.39% clinical strains from children with MPP harbored A2063G mutation. Notably, we didn’t detect mutations in the other spots at positions 2064, 2067, or 2617. However, several novel mutations were found, including a G to C transition at position 2601, a T insertion between positions 2589–2590 and 2612–2613, and a G insertion between positions 2586–2587. Further studies are required to test whether these new mutations contribute to macrolide resistance.
Previous studies focus on the minimum inhibitory concentrations of macrolides in vitro, and explore point mutations of MP clinical strains [10–12]. However, the clinical relevance of these mutations had not been clearly characterized and large sample studies were fewer. In this study, patients with MPP infected by mutant strains in the clinical, laboratory and radiologic characteristics were similar with patients without mutations. These results hint the clinical symptoms, laboratory and radiologic characteristics of MPP are generally similar between mutations and without mutations. Previous studies on the comparisons of clinical manifestations between the groups also reported no significant differences [14, 16, 17] As we all know, refractory MPP is characterized by long duration of fever, severe pulmonary inflammatory response. In this study, the prevalence of mutations in non-refractory and refractory MPP were 93.87% and 87.5%, which suggested that the infection of mutant strains does not increase the refractoriness of MPP in children. In addition, some children infected mutant strain also were cured only treated by macrolide treatment. These reasons may be the anti-inflammatory of macrolides works synergistically, and use of immunomodulators improve prognosis regardless of macrolide resistance [18, 19]. As previous research determined that the pathogenesis of MP are consist of direct damage mechanisms, immune damage and inflammatory damage[20] Thus, while there was some value in investigating the clinical significance of genetic mutations in MP, it is probably necessary to consider other risk factors that may trigger refractory, severe, or life-threatening pneumonia, such as a more robust host immune response with inflammatory cytokines, interleukins(IL), alexin, CD4+ T cell and so on [21–23]. In refractory MPP, immunomodulators such as systemic corticosteroids or intravenous gamma immunoglobulin are considered to be an effective treatment option by reducing host inflammatory response [18, 19]. Based on previous research, MP infection enhances mucin production and neutrophil recruitment, excretes inflammatory factors [20]. Mucus cell hypersecretion, especially goblet cell hyperplasia, has been shown in airways of MP infected mice [24]. Additionally, in children infected with MP, the expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, C1q, C3,C4 in serum increase to varying degrees [21, 22]. Those cytokines, ILs and alexin maybe participate in some classical or bypass activation pathways, mediate inflammatory reaction and immune responses, and have various biological activities.
More interestingly, our study and Wang et al found that MP-DNA load at enrollment was significantly different between refractory pneumonia and non-refractory pneumonia groups [18], which maybe a risk factor of refractory MPP because of direct damage caused by increased MP load. The direct damage mechanisms of MP infection include adhesion damage, destruction of membrane fusion, invasive damage, and toxic damage [20]. This suggests that the higher and more persistent MP stimulation may induce a much stronger direct damage. To sum up, the occurrence of refractory MPP in children maybe largely depends on the interaction between MP and host immune response, regardless of mutations.
Our study is significant because it has compared the manifestations of MPP in children in a high macrolide resistance period for MP. But it also had several limitations. Firstly, our hospital is a tertiary hospital, and the enrolled patients had a much longer period prior to hospitalization at our hospital than in previous studies. Even this population may therefore have included some very severe MPP cases. Secondarily, our sample size was relatively small, and without multicenter research. Lastly, our study is that the MIC values were not measured.