Changes in the anxiolytic and analgesic effects of virtual reality presentations with different content during impacted mandibular third molar extraction.

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1414951/v1

PDF

Research Article

Changes in the anxiolytic and analgesic effects of virtual reality presentations with different content during impacted mandibular third molar extraction.

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1414951/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

In many cases, surgical procedures are conducted under local anesthesia despite many patients feeling anxious or afraid of treatment. We have recently reported our use of virtual reality (VR) to alleviate the fear and anxiety experienced during oral surgical procedures conducted under local anesthesia. However, the effectiveness of VR in alleviating anxiety varies greatly between individuals, and it has been suggested that these differences in efficacy may depend on the viewer’s level of concentration. We therefore investigated whether the content of the VR presentation made any difference to its effect in alleviating anxiety, and whether it had any analgesic effect.

The study subjects were 172 patients who required impacted mandibular third molar extraction under local anesthesia in our department. They experienced one of two different types of VR presentation and were asked to complete a questionnaire about any changes in their anxiety or fear during the procedure, including a visual analog scale (VAS) score. As an objective evaluation, changes in pain threshold during the VR presentation were investigated using PainVision®.

Patients who did not experience a VR presentation (n = 48) reported intensified anxiety during the procedure, with an increased VAS score compared with that preoperatively. The VAS scores for patients who experienced a VR presentation, however, decreased significantly. For those patients who experienced a presentation showing a natural landscape (n = 51), the change in VAS score was −13.3 ± 28.7 mm, whereas for those who experienced a presentation showing a video game (n = 73) the change was −22.2 ± 32.1 mm, an even greater reduction. In a pain questionnaire completed by individuals who had experienced the video game presentations, approximately 70% reported that their pain had diminished. An objective evaluation of pain threshold using PainVision® also showed that the pain threshold of individuals increased by around 3% while experiencing the natural landscape VR presentation, but that while experiencing the video game presentation, it increased significantly by around 15% compared with baseline.

These results show that the content of the presentation affected not only the rate of decrease in anxiety and fear, but also the pain threshold. This indicated that experiencing a presentation of a video game or another setting in which thought is required may not only alleviate anxiety during surgical procedures, but also diminish pain.

Virtual reality

Games

Anxiety and fear

Pain threshold

Impacted Mandibular third molar extraction

During oral surgery, patients are required to keep their mouths open for a certain period, and the metallic screech of the drill and the unpleasant smell generated by the drilling of hard tissue such as teeth and bone all contribute to a high level of stress^1,2). In particular, the face is usually covered with a cloth to keep operations hygienic and protect the eyes, obscuring the patient’s view, and this generates high levels of anxiety and fear. Even when local infiltration anesthesia is highly effective, it can be difficult to relieve the patient’s anxiety and fear. Conventionally, intravenous or inhalation anesthesia, or oral tranquilizers have been used for patients with severe anxiety or fear, such as those with dental phobia, but there are limits to the use of drugs from the perspectives of both the patient and the institution, and they are not suitable for use in every case. Preoperative anxiety is also reportedly associated with complications, problematic behavior, and emotional distress³⁾. Methods of sedation should ideally involve as little physical invasiveness and burden as possible. Recent studies have shown that using aromatherapy⁴⁾ or listening to specific music⁵⁾ during dental treatment is effective in alleviating anxiety. We have recently reported that the use of virtual reality (VR) is subjectively and objectively effective in alleviating the fear and anxiety experienced during impacted mandibular third molar extraction⁶⁾ or other minor oral surgical procedures⁷⁾ conducted under local anesthesia.

VR refers to the techniques and systems used to create an environment that is not itself a physical original, but functions essentially in the same way by stimulating perception, including the user’s five senses. A major advantage of VR is that because it involves almost no physical invasion, it may provide a safe method of sedation⁸⁾. Our previous study also showed that it is highly effective in alleviating anxiety even for older patients, and since it can be used by a wide range of age groups, it has the potential to become a highly versatile tool.

However, problems have also surfaced. The VR experiences that we prepared and presented to patients featured landscapes and animals that were hardly moving, with the aim of inducing relaxation^6,7). However, some patients who experienced them, particularly younger men, complained that this content was “boring” or “uninteresting,” and for them it failed to produce the desired anxiolytic effect. This suggested that the response to the nature of the presentation might vary depending on factors such as the patient’s preferences, personality, and sex, and that the content of the VR presentation might thus modulate its effectiveness. In this study, patients were therefore asked to experience different presentations, and whether these resulted in any differences in the degree to which their anxiety was diminished was investigated. We evaluated whether experiencing a newly created presentation with content that required thought and concentration, separately from the previously used presentation of natural landscapes, would change their decrease in anxiety. Whether experiencing different presentations would make any difference to the pain threshold was also examined.

Subjects: The study population comprised 190 patients who required impacted mandibular third molar extraction in the Department of Oral Surgery of Saga University Hospital between April 2020 and March 2021. Ten of these patients were excluded because of a history of cybersickness or vertigo, pregnancy, or previous heart disease. The remaining 180 were randomly allocated to one of three groups: a non-VR group, a natural landscape VR group, and a video game VR group. Data were collected from 172 of these patients (66 men and 106 women) who comprised the final study population (Fig. 1). The mandibular wisdom teeth were impacted horizontally, corresponding to Position A or B and class I or II in Pell and Gregory’s classification⁹⁾. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Saga University (approval number 2017-12-05) and was registered with UMIN Clinical Trials registry (UMIN000035594; 19/01/2019), and informed consent was obtained from all patients. All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations imposed by the IRB.

Evaluation method

As a subjective evaluation, preoperative and postoperative fear and anxiety were evaluated by a questionnaire that included a visual analog scale (VAS). Anxiety was scored on a scale from “Completely relaxed” at 0 mm to “The most anxious state imaginable” at 100 mm. The post-treatment questionnaire asked patients to evaluate their satisfaction, reduction in anxiety, and change in pain during treatment carried out while experiencing VR on a five-point scale (Table 2).

Surgical treatment

After local infiltration anesthesia, patients lay down horizontally and were fitted with a patient monitor and a head-mounted display (Oculus Go 32 GB, Oculus VR, Menlo Park, CA). Before the impacted third molar extraction started, they experienced a VR presentation for a short period and were asked to confirm that they were not feeling uncomfortable or disturbed. The extractions were conducted by three board-certified oral surgeons. It was explained to the patients that should they feel uncomfortable or disturbed because of the VR during the extraction, the procedure would immediately be halted, and the VR removed. After the extraction was complete, the VR was removed, hemostasis was confirmed, and the procedure was concluded.

VR presentations

All prototype VR software we used for this study was specially developed by the company PR NETWORK Co. (Fukuoka, Japan). The author owns the copyright of this software. The natural landscape presentation was the presentation used in our previous study. Specifically, the VR reproduced a large film screen either in a cinema or set up outdoors (on a beach or in a garden), on which the images were projected. Natural scenes of animals exhibiting little movement, or of the sea or rivers, were projected onto the screen (Fig. 2A, Sup-1). We also produced a new, attack-type video game presentation. In this game, images of target-shooting and bowling were shown, with the user using a controller to attack the target and earn points (Fig. 2B & C, Sup-2). To prevent the subjects from becoming bored, they were permitted to choose freely among three different types of game during the procedure. To prevent them from shaking their heads during the presentation, the headset was set up so that the edge of the image disappeared if a subject moved their head so that they were no longer looking straight ahead. Music was matched to the images and played to the patients via the head-mounted display.

Pain threshold measurement: This experiment was conducted on 46 healthy volunteers (9 men and 37 women; mean age 27.0 years). They experienced the VR presentations while lying flat in the same position as the patients who underwent the surgical procedure. Their pain thresholds were measured using a PainVision® PS-2100 (Nipro Corporation, Osaka, Japan) to measure the level of electric current perceived as pain^10,11). Measurements were conducted to determine: (1) the minimal perceived current (without VR); (2) the current while experiencing the natural landscape VR; and (3) the current while experiencing the video game VR. Each of these measurements was conducted three times, and the mean values were calculated. Because the minimum perceived current varied widely between individuals, the rate of change for everyone was calculated.

Analysis method

A t-test was used for intergroup comparisons, with JMP® Pro 12 (SAS Institute, Tokyo) used for data analysis. As a test method, Tukey-Kramer’s HSD test was performed as a comparison of all three groups.

Table 1 shows the compositions of the three randomly assigned groups. There was no significant difference among the groups in age. The completion rate of the surgical procedure on patients fitted with VR was 100%, and the extraction was not discontinued because of VR use in any case. No patient complained of motion-sickness-like symptoms after experiencing VR.

1. For the natural landscape VR group, the results of the satisfaction questionnaire were Excellent 34%, Good 48%, Fair 12%, and Poor 6%. For the video game VR group, the results were Excellent 42%, Good 34%, Fair 20%, and Poor 4% (Table 3). No patient in either group responded that it was Unacceptable. In both groups, the reason for choosing the Poor response was that the images were not in focus during the presentation.

2. A comparison of the results of the decreased anxiety questionnaire between the natural landscape VR and video game VR groups showed high rates of decrease in both groups, with 80% of those in the natural landscape VR group and 84% of those in the video game VR group responding that it had either Decreased Substantially or Decreased (Table 4).

3. An investigation of differences between the preoperative and postoperative VAS scores for anxiety and fear found that, as in our previous report, in the non-VR group, the VAS score for anxiety tended to increase postoperatively by 4.0 ± 22.3 mm compared with that preoperatively. In the two VR groups, however, the VAS score decreased significantly compared with the score for the non-VR group. A comparison between the two VR presentations showed that, for those patients who experienced a presentation showing a natural landscape (n = 51), the decrease in VAS score was -13.3 ± 28.7 mm, whereas for those who experienced a presentation showing a video game (n = 73), the decrease was -22.2 ± 32.1 mm, an even greater reduction (Fig. 3). However, there was no clearly significant difference between the natural landscape VR and video game groups.

4. The results of the pain questionnaire by the patients who experienced the video game presentation were Decreased Substantially 21%, Decreased 47%, Unchanged 32%, Increased Slightly 0%, and Increased 0%, with approximately 70% reporting that their pain had diminished (Table 5).

5. In the investigation of changes in pain threshold using PainVision®, the percentage change in current while experiencing the natural landscape VR and the video game VR compared with the value without VR as baseline was calculated. In terms of the mean threshold shift, the threshold increased by around 3% compared with baseline while experiencing the natural landscape presentation. However, while experiencing the video game presentation, it increased significantly by approximately 15% compared with baseline (Fig. 4).

Very many patients are frightened of or anxious about dental treatment¹²⁾. One major reason is that the treatment site is in the facial area itself, so that the treatment can be seen and remembered. Pain and fear they have felt during previous dental treatment frequently become imprinted, and many patients feel stressed prior to treatment. In wisdom tooth extraction, even if the patient’s vision is obscured, they are required to keep their mouths open for a certain period, and the metallic screech of the drill and the unpleasant smell during drilling all contribute to a high level of stress. In practice, even if adequate analgesia is provided by local anesthesia, patients still experience mental and physical stress during the procedure. In some cases, this may even lead to dental phobia. The methods used to relieve this anxiety and fear of treatment include sedation by inhalation anesthesia or intravenous anesthesia, as well as the use of oral tranquilizers. However, drug administration may cause side effects or be contraindicated, and is thus not suitable for all patients.

In a previous study, we demonstrated that the use of VR decreased anxiety and fear of surgical treatment under local anesthesia both subjectively and objectively^6,7). In our objective assessment using heart rate variability (HRV)^13,14), we showed that, although patients were in a state of arousal preoperatively, with sympathetic nervous system activity predominating, experiencing VR with images designed to induce relaxation restored balance with parasympathetic nervous activity, and they became relaxed.

VR is currently in use in several medical fields^15–17). It consists of three elements: three-dimensional presence, autonomy, and real-time interaction. It can thus transport the user into a different experience by stimulating all the senses, not just sight¹⁸⁾. The employment of VR techniques such as the one used in this study does not require the use of specific drugs and involves almost no physical invasion. A further advantage is that, because it requires neither drugs nor expensive equipment, it does not entail any running costs. Our previous results also demonstrated that it can be used by a wide range of age groups, including older people. The results of the present study showed that the content of the VR presentation modulated its effect on decreasing anxiety. It was also demonstrated, both subjectively and objectively, that a video game presentation that required thought reduced pain. Another study has reported that the use of VR during burn treatment enables the dose of analgesics to be reduced, a finding that supports our results^19–21). Although there is individual variation in its effects on reducing anxiety and pain, the effects appear to be dependent on the individual’s level of concentration while experiencing the presentation. This suggests that the viewer’s preferences may be a major factor in the selection of a presentation. The physiological mechanism that diminishes pain during concentration on a presentation has yet to be clearly identified. We intend to use near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) or dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure changes in cerebral perfusion to demonstrate the extent to which these effects can be obtained in future.

One point that warrants attention in the experience of VR is cybersickness^22–24). This condition is known to occur when the viewer’s gaze follows text or images moving rapidly on the screen, which results in headaches, nausea, and feelings of unsteadiness. There are calls for particular care to be taken with children^25,26). In this study, even the video game presentation that we produced did not cause any patient to complain of cybersickness-like symptoms. As the age range expands, however, care will be required in the future to check that cybersickness does not occur while experiencing VR.

A head-mounted display is required to experience VR, but the thickness and heaviness of these displays is an impediment for both operator and patient. It is hoped that smaller, lighter devices will be developed in the future.

In a previous study, we showed that most patients who used VR during a surgical procedure expressed the wish to use VR during other such procedures in the future. This suggested that VR is readily accepted by patients and can fill a need as a sedative device. The recent universal adoption of smartphones and the development of the games industry have increased the proportion of people who have experienced VR, and its introduction into medicine should be relatively easy. To enable its use by a wide range of age groups, including older people, in the future it will be necessary to choose presentations based on age and individual preferences. The evolution of VR, augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and cross reality (XR) is proceeding apace, as is that of image technology²⁷⁾. If these issues can be resolved, VR has the potential to become a medical assistive device not only for resolving anxiety, but also for alleviating pain during dental treatment.

Our results showed that the use of VR during impacted mandibular third molar extraction under local anesthesia effectively alleviated fear and anxiety during treatment without side effects. They also suggested that pain relief may vary depending on the content of the presentation. VR has potential as a medical assistive device for use during outpatient surgery under local anesthesia.

Author information

Affiliations:

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University

Nabeshima 5-1-1, Saga 849-8501, Japan Yoshio Yamashita, Reona Aijima, Atsushi Danjo

Author’s contributions:

YY designed the study. All authors performed all surgical treatment. RA contributed to the statistical analysis. All the authors interpreted data. YY wrote the manuscript, all authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests:

The authors declare no competing interests.

Funding:

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Acknowledgement

The author kindly appreciates the precious work of PR NETWORK Co. (Fukuoka, Japan) for VR production.

Momota, Y., Tomioka, S., Furukita, M., Satsuma, T., Takano, H., Azuma, M. Adrenergic urticarial and glossalgia induced by stress during dental therapy and monitored by heart rate variability analysis. A case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, Med, Pathol 25, 264–266. (2013).
Matsumura, K., Miura, K., Takata, Y., et al. Changes in blood pressure and heart rate variability during dental surgery. Am J Hypertens 11, 1376–1380. (1998).
Johnston, M., Carpenter, L. Relationship between preoperative anxiety and postoperative state. Psychol Med 10, 361–367. (1980).
Pachimsawat, P., Tangprasert, K. & Jantaratnotai, N. The calming effect of roasted coffee aroma in patients undergoing dental procedures. Sci Rep. 11(1),1384. (2021).
Yamashita, K., Kibe, T., Ohno, S., Kohjitani, A., Sugimura, M. The effects of music listening during extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar on the autonomic nervous system and psychological state. J Oral Maxillfac Surg 77, 1153. E1-1153.e8. (2019).
Yamashita, Y., Shimohira, D., Aijima, R., Mori, K., Danjo, A. Clinical effect of virtual reality to relieve anxiety during impacted mandibular third molar extraction under local anesthesia. J Oral Maxillfac Surg 78(4), 545.e1-545.e6. (2020).
Yamashita, Y., Shimohira, D., Aijima, R., Mori, K., Danjo, A. Clinical application of virtual reality to alleviate anxiety during oral surgery under local anesthesia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Pathol 32 (6), 441–444. (2020).
Tarrant, J., Viczko, J., Cope, H. Virtual reality for anxiety reduction demonstrated by quantitative EEG: a pilot study. Front Psychol 9, Article 1280. (2018).
Pell, G.J., Gregory, G.T. Impacted mandibular third molars: Classification and modified techniques for removal. The Dental Digest 39, 330–338. (1933).
Inoue, T., Soshi, S., Kubota, M., Marumo, K. New method for the quantitative Assessment of sensory disturbances in cervical myelopathy: Application for neurological level diagnosis. Spine Surg Relat Res. 4(3), 216–222. (2020).
Yoshida, Y., Satoh, A., Yamada, T., Aisu, N., Matsuoka, Y., Koganemaru, T., Kajitani, R., Munechika, T., Matsumoto, Y., Nagano, S., et al. The relationship between evaluation methods for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Sci Rep. 9(1), 20361. (2019).
Becker, D.E. Pain management: Part 1: Managing acute and postoperative dental pain. Anesth Prog 57, 67–78. (2010).
Malik, M. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use: Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North America Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation 93, 1043–1065. (1996).
Malik, M. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J 17, 354–381. (1996).
Gujjar, K.R., van Wijk, A., Kumar, R., de Jongh, A. Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of dental phobia in adults: A randomized controlled trial. J Anxiety Disord 62, 100–108. (2019).
Abe, T., Raison, R., Shinohara, N., Khan, S., Ahmed, K., Dasgupta, P. The effect of visual-spatial ability on the learning of robot-assisted surgical skills. J Surg Educ 75, 458–464. (2018).
Maples-Keller, J.L., Yasinski, C., Manjin, N., Rothbaum, B.O. Virtual reality-enhanced extinction of phobias and post-traumatic stress. Neurotherapeutics 14, 554–563. (2017).
Oing, T., Prescott, J. Implementations of virtual reality for anxiety-related disorders: Systematic review. JMIR Serious Games 6, e10965. (2018).
Hoffman, H.G., Doctor, J.N., Patterson, D.R., Carrougher, G.J., Furness, T.A. 3rd. Virtual reality as an adjunctive pain control during burn wound care in adolescent patients. Pain 85, 305–309. (2000).
Khadra, C., Ballard, A., Dery, J., et al. Projector-based virtual reality dome environment for procedural pain and anxiety in young children with burn injuries: a pilot study. J Pain Res 11, 343–353. (2018).
Scapin, S., Echevarria-Guanilo, M.E., Boeira Fuculo Junior, P.R., Goncalves, N., Rocha, P.K., Coimbra, R. Virtual reality in the treatment of burn patients: A systematic review. Burns 44, 1403–1416. (2017).
Pot-Kolder, R., Veling, W., Counotte, J., van der Gaag, M. Anexiety partially mediates cybersickness symptoms in immersive virtual reality environments. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 21, 187–193. (2018).
Weech, S., Varghese, J.P., Barnett-Cowan, M. Estimating the sensorimotor components of cybersickness. J Neurophysiol 120, 2201–2217. (2018).
Mazloumi Gavgani, A., Hodgson, D.M., Nalivaiko, E. Effects of visual flow direction on signs and symptoms of cybersickness. PLoS One 12, e0182790. (2017).
Shetty, V., Suresh, L.R., Hegde, A.M. Effect of virtual reality distraction on pain and anxiety during dental treatment in 5 to 8 year old children. J Clin Pediatr Dent 43, 97–102. (2019).
Arane, K., Behboudi, A., Goldman, R.D. Virtual reality for pain and anxiety management in children. Can Fam Physician 63, 932–934. (2017)
Tepper, O.M., Rudy, H.L., Lefkowitz, A., et al. Mixed reality with HoloLens: Where virtual reality meets augmented reality in the operating room. Plast Reconstr Surg 140, 1066–1070. (2017).

Tables 1 to 5 are available in the Supplementary Files section.

No competing interests reported.

PDF

Editor invited by journal
29 Mar, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
29 Mar, 2022
First submitted to journal
03 Mar, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Changes in the anxiolytic and analgesic effects of virtual reality presentations with different content during impacted mandibular third molar extraction.

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Subjects And Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Tables

Competing Interests

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1