Circulating levels of PCSK9, ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) in stage III breast cancers

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1420016/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Circulating levels of PCSK9, ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) in stage III breast cancers

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1420016/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background/ Synopsis: Cholesterol plays an important role in sustaining tumor growth and metastasis in a large variety of cancers. New and powerful cholesterol-lowering drugs are being used in combination to treat cardiovascular diseases. Thus, it becomes intuitive to verify whether these drugs could be combined to induce a cholesterol shortage sufficient to impede tumor progression. Circulating levels of the targets of a new generation of lipid-lowering drugs have not been fully investigated in cancers. Given that drugs directed against PCSK9 (evolocumab, alirocumab, inclisiran), ANGPTL3 (evinacumab) and Lp(a) (pelacarsen) are available, it becomes important to assess circulating levels of these drug targets and their role in cancers.

Objective/Purpose: To compare circulating levels of PCSK9, ANGPTL3, and Lp(a) in women with stage III breast cancer versus women with premalignant or benign breast lesions.

Methods: Twenty-three plasma samples from women diagnosed with a stage III breast cancer (ductal, lobular or mixed) were matched for age with twenty-three plasma samples from women bearing premalignant (stage 0, n=9) or benign (n= 14) breast lesions. The lipid profile (Apo B, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides levels) and Lp(a) were measured on a Roche Modular analytical platform, whereas LDL levels were calculated with the Friedewald formula. ANGPTL3 and PCSK9 plasma levels were quantitated by ELISA. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.4.

Results: PCSK9 levels were significantly higher in women with stage III breast cancer compared to age-matched counterparts presenting a benign lesion (95.9 +/- 27.1 ng/mL vs. 78.5 +/- 19.3 ng/mL, p<0.05, n=14). Moreover, PCSK9 levels positively correlated with breast disease severity (benign, stage 0, stage III) (Rho=0.34, p<0.05, n=46). In contrast, ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) plasma levels did not display any association with breast disease status and lipids did not correlate with disease severity.

Conclusion: In this cohort of 46 women, PCSK9 levels increased along with the severity of breast disease. Given that PCSK9 plays an important role in maintaining cholesterolemia and has been shown to degrade MHC-I on tumor cells, impeding immune T-cells response to tumors, the association between PCSK9 levels and breast disease severity needs to be further investigated in larger studies.

Cancer Biology

ANGPTL3

Lipoprotein(a)

PCSK9

breast cancer

endogenous lipid metabolism

cancer progression

Growing evidence suggests a relationship between cholesterol availability and cancer progression [1–4]. Breast cancer is no exception, with preclinical data supporting the important role of cholesterol to sustain cancer development and progression [5–9]. Circulating levels of lipids do not reflect satisfactorily the presence of cancer, with discrepant data published for the association between circulating levels of cholesterol and breast cancer. Some studies described an association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and breast cancers [8, 10, 11], while others showed no association [12, 13] or an inverse relationship [14–16]. Circulating cholesterol levels are a function of several concomitant processes such as synthesis, absorption, distribution, uptake and degradation. The lack of robust association between cholesterolemia and breast cancer might be explained by the interplay between the above-mentioned processes.

PCSK9 triggers hepatic LDL-receptor (LDLR) degradation [17] resulting in higher circulating levels of LDL-C [18, 19]. Inhibition of PCSK9 enhances LDLR levels, resulting in lower circulating levels of LDL-C. Although PCSK9 and its inhibition have been principally studied in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease [20–23], a growing number of reports suggest a role of PCSK9 in cancers [24–28], not only as a cholesterol supplier, but also as an immune response down regulator, by triggering degradation of the Major Histocompatibility Complex 1 (MHC-I) receptor [29–31]. Inhibition of PCSK9 not only protects LDLR from degradation but also protects MHC-I from PCSK9-induced degradation [32]. It has been shown in animal models of breast cancers that increased levels of MHC-I enhance both natural immunity and immunotherapies against cancer [33, 34]. Cholesterol metabolism disruption, by combining PCSK9 inhibition with ezetimibe and a statin, is currently under investigation in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancers (NCT 04862260), while PCSK9 inhibition and its effect on MHC-I is being studied in patients with glioblastomas (NCT 04937413).

Angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) is an inhibitor of both lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase [35–38]. Individuals with ANGPTL3 loss-of-function have higher lipoprotein lipase activity and display low blood levels of triglycerides, LDL and HDL-cholesterol, a condition known as familial combined hypocholesterolemia [39, 40]. This condition prompted the development of ANGPTL3 inhibitors to treat an almost opposite phenotype: homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia [41–43]. Little has been documented on the link between ANGPTL3 and cancers, yet some associations have been reported [44, 45].

Lp(a) is an LDL-like molecule that has caught a lot of attention these past few years in the field of cardiometabolic diseases [46–48]. Elevated levels of Lp(a) represent an emerging risk factor for atherosclerosis and thrombogenic events [49–51]. Lp(a) levels are genetically determined [52] and do not correlate with LDL-cholesterol levels. Association between certain types of cancers, including hormone-dependent breast cancers, and Lp(a) levels are inconsistent, with some studies describing a link [53–57], while others reporting no association with cancers [58].

The present work aimed to verify whether circulating levels of PCSK9, ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) are modified in breast cancers. We hypothesized that the tumoral process promotes a rewiring of the endogenous lipid metabolism and triggers changes in one or many of these factors. Given that monoclonal antibodies and/or antisense therapy directed against PCSK9, ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) are now available, any increase in these circulating factors would warrant further investigation into their inhibition in breast cancers.

Subjects and blood samples. Our study was performed using plasma samples from the registered biobank of the Centre des maladies du sein Deschênes-Fabia (Quebec City, Canada), collected from women aged 36 years or older, diagnosed with a benign breast disease (n = 14), stage 0 (n = 9) or stage III breast tumor (n = 23). Stage 0 breast tumors are non-invasive and found only in the lining of the lactiferous ducts, i.e., without spreading into the surrounding breast tissue. Stage III breast cancers are non-metastatic tumors that invade nearby tissues (ex: lymph nodes, muscles). Plasmas from patients with stage III breast cancers (cases) were age-matched with plasmas from women with benign lesion or stage 0 breast cancer (controls). Cancer stage was evaluated using the TNM system [59, 60]. Stage III breast tumors were either ductal, lobular or mixed. Body mass index (BMI) was extracted from medical records. Plasmas (EDTA) were collected between 2010 and 2014 from non-fasting patients and prior to initiation of cancer therapy. Samples were centrifuged to allow plasma separation, aliquoted and stored at -80°C. The number of freeze and thaw cycles were the same for all the samples. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and ethics approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the CHU de Québec (2021–5624).

Assessment of the lipid profile, Apo B and Lp(a). Samples were sent to the Core laboratory of the Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus (Quebec City, Canada) for measurements of apolipoprotein B100 (Apo B, g/L), Lipoprotein (a) abbreviated as Lp(a) (nmol/L), total cholesterol (mmol/L), HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) and triglycerides (mmol/L) using the Modular analytical platform (Roche). LDL-cholesterol was calculated with the Friedewald formula: LDL-cholesterol = total cholesterol – (triglycerides/ 2.2) – HDL in mmol/L. Non-HDL cholesterol was calculated by subtraction of HDL-cholesterol from total cholesterol in mmol/L. Lp(a) measurements lower than the reportable range (Lp(a) < 10 nmol/L) were set to a default value of 3 nmol/L (1/2 of the lower limit of detection) for statistical analyses. Insulin and C-peptide (pmol/L) were measured at the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université Laval (Quebec City, Canada) on a Centaur instrument (Siemens).

ELISA for ANGPTL3 and PCSK9. ELISA kits to measure ANGPTL3 in ng/mL (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and PCSK9 levels in ng/mL (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) were used according to manufacturers’ instructions with all supplied reagents. For ANGPTL3 quantitation, 50 µL of reconstituted ANGPTL3 standards or 1:120 diluted samples were added in duplicates into the 96-well ELISA plate. Fifty µL of antibody cocktail, prepared from a dilution of anti-human ANGPTL3 capture antibodies with anti-human ANGPTL3 HRP-coupled detector antibodies, were added to all wells, following which the plate was incubated 1 hour at room temperature on a plate shaker. No blocking step was required. After incubation, the plate was washed 3 times. HRP substrate (TMB development solution) was added to wells and allowed to incubate in the dark for 10 minutes. To avoid HRP enzymatic signal saturation, the stop solution was added before reaching an optical density at 600nm (OD₆₀₀) of 1. OD₄₅₀ was recorded as endpoint reading. For PCSK9 quantitation, samples were diluted 1:60. A standard curve was established with serial dilutions of reconstituted human PCSK9 in the assay diluent solution provided by the manufacturer. Anti-human PCSK9 pre-coated 96-well microplate was washed 4 times with washing buffer. Fifty µL of assay buffer was added per well prior to loading 50 µL of standard or diluted samples in duplicates on the plate. No blocking step was required. The plate was then incubated at room temperature for 2 hours, then washed 4 times before addition of 100 µL of anti-human PCSK9 detection antibody. A 1-hour incubation followed. After 4 more washes, avidin-HRP solution was added to each well and allowed to incubate for 30 minutes. The plate was washed 6 times preceding addition of the substrate solution followed by a 15-minutes incubation in the dark. The HRP chromogenic reaction was quenched with a stop solution and OD was recorded at 450nm.

Statistical analysis. Data are presented in tables as means with standard deviations and as medians with interquartile ranges. Data analysis was performed by comparing cases to age-matched controls using the statistical softwares R version 4.0.4 and SAS version 9.4. Once the normal distribution of variables was verified, differences in the mean values between the case and control groups were analyzed using paired Student T tests. If not normally distributed, differences between measurements (cases vs controls) were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

Control group was stratified by benign or stage 0 breast disease status One-way analyses of variances (ANOVA) or their non-parametric equivalents, Kruskall Wallis H tests, were applied to assess differences between the 3 resulting groups (benign, stage 0 and stage III). If found significant (p < 0.05), a post-hoc Tukey test was performed to identify a group that significantly differed from the others.

To assess whether the severity of the breast disease (benign breast disease, stage 0 breast cancer, stage III breast cancer) was associated with the variables under study (PCSK9, ANGPTL3, lipid profile components), we performed partial Spearman correlation tests adjusted for age and BMI. Results are displayed as graphical diagrams generated with the software R version 4.0.4 for Windows.

Biochemical parameters of the control and the stage III breast cancer (cases) groups

Table 1 shows the characteristics of patients with the benign disease of the breast (n = 14) and the stage 0 breast cancer (n = 9) groups, which formed the control group (n = 23). No statistically significant differences were obtained for age, BMI, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol, Lp(a), Apo B, PCSK9, ANGPTL3, non-fasting C-peptide or insulin. However, a difference in HDL-C was observed between benign disease (mean 1.3 mmol/L; SD ± 0.4 mmol/L, n = 14) and stage 0 breast cancer (mean 1.8 mmol/L; SD ± 0.4 mmol/L, n = 9), with overlapping values when considering standard deviations. Characteristics of the stage III breast cancer group (n = 23) versus the control group (n = 23) are presented in Table 2 as mean and median values. No significant differences were observed between case and control groups for age, BMI, lipid profile, non-fasting C-peptide and non-fasting insulin (p-values > 0.05 for the two-group comparison).

Table 1

Biological and biochemical characteristics of the control group stratified by breast disease type : benign breast disease and stage 0 breast tumor.
Variable:	Benign (n = 14):		Stage 0 (n = 9):		Two-group comparison
	Mean ±SD	Median ±IQR	Mean ±SD	Median ±IQR	p-value
Age (years)	54	54	58	51	0.87 ‡
Age (years)	± 9	[50; 62]	± 6	[50; 60]	0.87 ‡
BMI (kg/m²)	26.0	26.0	24.0	23.9	0.28 †
BMI (kg/m²)	± 4.9	[21.1; 30.8]	± 3.0	[22.7; 24.5]	0.28 †
Cholesterol (mmol/L)	5.0	4.8	5.2	5.3	0.59 †
Cholesterol (mmol/L)	± 1.0	[4.4; 5.9]	± 0.4	[5.0; 5.3]	0.59 †
Triglycerides (mmol/L)	1.8	1.5	1.1	1.0	0.15 ‡
Triglycerides (mmol/L)	± 1.1	[1.0; 2.0]	± 0.3	[0.8; 1.4]	0.15 ‡
HDL-C (mmol/L)	1.3	1.3	1.8	1.8	0.01 †*
HDL-C (mmol/L)	± 0.4	[1.1; 1. 6]	± 0.4	[1.4; 2.2]	0.01 †*
LDL-C (mmol/L)	2.9	2.8	2.9	3.1	0.95 †
LDL-C (mmol/L)	± 1.2	[2.2; 3.8]	± 0.7	[2.3; 3.3]	0.95 †
Non-HDL (mmol/L)	3.7	3.5	3.4	3.6	0.52 †
Non-HDL (mmol/L)	± 1.1	[3.0; 4.6]	± 0.8	[2.8; 3.8]	0.52 †
Lp(a) (nmol/L)	55	33	86	47	0.36 ‡
Lp(a) (nmol/L)	± 58	[11; 89]	± 92	[17; 161]	0.36 ‡
Apo B (g/L)	1.00	0.97	0.95	1.00	0.71 †
Apo B (g/L)	± 0.32	[0.78; 1.26]	± 0.2	[0.76; 1.09]	0.71 †
PCSK9 (ng/mL)	78.5	76.7	100.1	85.4	0.09 †
PCSK9 (ng/mL)	± 19.3	[65.2; 94.0]	± 39.0	[68.7; 142.3]	0.09 †
ANGPTL3 (ng/mL)	94.0	93.1	104.1	110.4	0.50 †
ANGPTL3 (ng/mL)	± 36.2	[59.4; 132.9]	± 31.3	[78.2; 128.0]	0.50 †
Non-fasting C-peptide (pmol/L)	860	882	726	554	0.51 †
Non-fasting C-peptide (pmol/L)	± 495	[356; 1093]	± 432	[371; 982]	0.51 †
Non-fasting Insulin (pmol/L)	122	124	97	44	0.60 ‡
Non-fasting Insulin (pmol/L)	± 88	[25; 186]	± 95	[32; 140]	0.60 ‡

SD:Standard Deviation; IQR: Interquartile range; † Unpaired Student-T-test; ‡ Unpaired Wilcoxon Mann Whitney U test; * p-value < 0.05.

Table 2

Characteristics of the whole cohort: stage III breast tumor vs control participants (benign disease of the breast pooled with stage 0 breast cancer).
Variable	Control (n = 23) Benign and Stage 0		Case (n = 23) Stage III		Case-Control comparison p-values
	Mean ± SD	Median ±IQR	Mean ± SD	Median ±IQR	Unpaired	Paired
Age (years)	54	54	55	54	0.86 †	0.12 ^₮
Age (years)	± 7.7	[50; 62]	± 7.3	[51; 62]	0.86 †	0.12 ^₮
BMI (kg/m²)	25.2	24.7	26.2	25.7	0.46 †	0.45 ^₮
BMI (kg/m²)	± 4.3	[21.4; 30.0]	± 4.6	[23.1; 28.4]	0.46 †	0.45 ^₮
Triglycerides (mmol/L)	1.5	1.3	1.5	1.5	0.33 ‡	0.77 ^₩
Triglycerides (mmol/L)	± 1.0	[0.8; 1.7]	± 0.5	[1.2; 1.5]	0.33 ‡	0.77 ^₩
Cholesterol (mmol/L)	5.1	5.1	5.0	5.1	0.77‡	0.79 ^₩
Cholesterol (mmol/L)	± 0.8	[4.7; 5.4]	± 1.0	[4.1; 5.6]	0.77‡	0.79 ^₩
HDL-C (mmol/L)	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.4	0.77 †	0.75 ^₮
HDL-C (mmol/L)	± 0.4	[1.2; 1.8]	± 0.4	[1.2; 1.7]	0.77 †	0.75 ^₮
LDL-C (mmol/L)	2.9	3.0	2.9	2.7	0.90 †	0.92 ^₮
LDL-C (mmol/L)	± 1.0	[2.3; 3.4]	± 0.8	[2.1; 3.6]	0.90 †	0.92 ^₮
Non-HDL (mmol/L)	3.6	3.5	3.6	3.6	0.87 †	0.89 ^₮
Non-HDL (mmol/L)	± 0.9	[3.0; 4.0]	± 0.9	[2.6; 4.3]	0.87 †	0.89 ^₮
Apo B (g/L)	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.87 †	0.88 ^₮
Apo B (g/L)	± 0.3	[0.8; 1.1]	± 0.2	[0.8; 1.1]	0.87 †	0.88 ^₮
Lp(a) (nmol/L)	67	42	94	35	0.97 ‡	0.51 ^₩
Lp(a) (nmol/L)	± 72.9	[13; 136]	± 117.1	[12; 169]	0.97 ‡	0.51 ^₩
PCSK9 (ng/mL)	87.0	81.7	98.9	97.9	0.056 ‡	0.065 ^₩
PCSK9 (ng/mL)	± 29.8	[67.5; 104.2]	± 23.5	[84.1; 117.5]	0.056 ‡	0.065 ^₩
ANGPTL3 (ng/mL)	98.0	95.0	108.2	104.1	0.36 †	0.33 ^₮
ANGPTL3 (ng/mL)	± 34.0	[70.0; 131.3]	± 41.5	[85.3; 130.9]	0.36 †	0.33 ^₮
Non-fasting C-peptide (pmol/L)	808	856	799	652	0.81 ‡	0.99 ^₩
Non-fasting C-peptide (pmol/L)	± 466	[398; 1066]	± 500.3	[437; 1088]	0.81 ‡	0.99 ^₩
Non-fasting Insulin (pmol/L)	112	106	121	72	0.95 ‡	0.75 ^₩
Non-fasting Insulin (pmol/L)	± 89.7	[31; 160]	± 114	[37; 218]	0.95 ‡	0.75 ^₩

SD: Standard Deviation; IQR: Interquartile range; † Unpaired Student-T-test; ‡ Unpaired Wilcoxon Mann Whitney U test; ₮ Paired Student T-test; ₩ Paired Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Circulating levels of PCSK9, ANGPTL3 and Lipoprotein (a) in Stage III breast cancer vs control group

Levels of Lp(a), ANGPTL3 and PCSK9 in the stage III breast cancer group and in the control group are presented in Table 2 and in Fig. 1. Concentrations of ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) were not different between stage III breast cancer and the control group (p-values of 0.33 and 0.51 for ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) respectively, Fig. 1A and 1B). However, PCSK9 levels were higher in the stage III breast cancer as compared to the control group, although the comparison did not reach statistical significance (p-value of 0.065, Fig. 1C). To verify whether pooling together benign pathology of the breast with stage 0 breast cancers could blur associations, our control group was stratified by type of breast disease (benign or stage 0). No significant difference for ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) were obtained between groups (Figs. 2A and 2B). Figure 3A shows a near-significant trend for an increase in PCSK9 levels with breast disease severity (p = 0.056). A paired T-test performed between women with a benign pathology of the breast and age-matched stage III cancer subgroup indicated a significant increase in PCSK9 concentrations in the stage III cancer subgroup (95.9 ± 27.1 ng/mL, n = 14) as compared to age-matched women in the benign group (78.5 ± 19.3 ng/mL, n = 14). See Fig. 3B, p-value = 0.031, n = 14 in each group.

Figure 1. ANGPTL3, Lp(a) and PCSK9 distributions between control and stage III breast cancer groups. Boxplots represent the plasma levels of each circulating factor with median and interquartile range. Dotted lines connect age-matched invididuals. Wilcoxon signed rank statistical test did not yield any significant difference between stage III breast cancer and control groups plasma level distribution (p > 0.05). Stage III constituted the case group (n = 23). Control group combined benign pathology of the breast (n = 14) with stage 0 breast cancers (n = 9).

Figure 2. (A) ANGPTL3 and (B) Lp(a) circulating level distributions after control group stratification. Distributions between benign disease of the breast (n = 14), stage 0 (n = 9) and stage III (n = 23) breast tumor groups are represented as box plots. No significant difference was found following group comparison with ANOVA or Kruskal − Wallis.

Figure 3. PCSK9 levels comparison between benign disease of the breast, stage 0 and stage III groups. (A) ANOVA analysis of PCSK9 levels between the three groups indicated an increase of PCSK9 with severity of the breast disease that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.056). (B) Two-group comparison with Student T-test between benign disease of the breast and stage III breast tumor groups yielded a significant difference (p < 0.05) with higher PCSK9 levels in stage III breast cancer subgroup (95.9 ± 27.1 ng/mL, n = 14) compared to age-matched benign group (78.5 ± 19.3 ng/mL, n = 14).

Correlation between breast disease severity versus lipids, PCSK9, ANGPTL3 and Lp(a)

We next investigated the relationship between severity of breast disease and the lipid profile, PCSK9, ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) plasma levels, adjusted for age and BMI. No correlation was observed between the lipid profile (total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, LDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol or Apo B) and the severity of the breast disease (Table 3). The same observation was made for ANGPTL3 and Lp(a), for which no correlation was found with severity of the disease. A significant positive correlation appeared between PCSK9 levels and the severity of the breast disease (Rho Spearman = 0.34, p = 0.02, Table 3) a similar correlation as the one obtained before any adjustment (Rho Spearman = 0.34, p = 0.02).

Table 3

**Severity of breast disease, lipid panel and PCSK9 levels: partial correlation analyses.** Dependent variables were adjusted for age and BMI. No correlation between tumor stage (benign disease of the breast, stage 0 breast cancer, stage III breast cancer) and the lipid profile was obtained, however a significant correlation between PCSK9 levels and tumor stage, as measured by Spearman Rho coefficient calculation, was obtained (* p < 0.05).
Controlled variables	Dependent variable	Spearman coefficient	p-value
Age and BMI	Cholesterol Triglycerides HDL-C LDL-C Non-HDL Apolipoprotein B ANGPTL3 Lp(a) PCSK9	-0.010 0.033 0.147 0.004 -0.017 -0.015 0.127 0.043 0.339	0.947 0.833 0.342 0.980 0.913 0.925 0.409 0.781 0.024*

Correlation analyses between all variables

We conducted a series of Spearman correlations to investigate the existence of associations between the different parameters analyzed in our cohort (Fig. 4). Many well-documented associations were observed. Non-fasting insulin and its secretion by-product, C-peptide, showed a significant positive correlation with BMI (non-fasting insulin: Rho = 0.53, p-value = 0.0001; non-fasting C-peptide: Rho = 0.48, p = 0.0008) and triglycerides (non-fasting insulin: Rho = 0.38, p-value = 0.009; non-fasting C-peptide: Rho = 0.42, p-value = 0.003). Similarly, triglycerides showed a positive correlation with BMI (Rho = 0.39, p-value = 0.008). HDL-cholesterol was negatively correlated to BMI (Rho=-0.42, p-value = 0.004) and to triglycerides (Rho=-0.71, p-value = 4x10^− 8). Non-HDL cholesterol, which accounts mainly for atherogenic particles, showed a strong significant correlation with LDL-cholesterol (Rho = 0.91, p-value = 2x10^− 18) and a correlation with triglycerides (Rho = 0.33, p-value = 0.02). Apolipoprotein B, which is the core protein of LDL and VLDL, showed a very strong correlation with non-HDL (Rho = 0.92, p-value = 3x10^− 19) and LDL-cholesterol (Rho = 0.90, p-value = 5x10^− 17).

As a less predictable outcome, a correlation between ANGPTL3 and age was found to be significant (Rho = 0.30, p-value = 0.04). No correlation was observed between the lipid panel and either ANGPTL3, Lp(a) or PCSK9.

Figure 4. Correlation between all variables under study in the entire cohort. Relationship between age, body mass index (BMI), Insulin, C-peptide, triglycerides (Trig), Total cholesterol (Chol), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B100 (Apo B), ANGPTL3, lipoprotein (a) (Lpa), and PCSK9 were assessed in the entire cohort. (A) Matrice on the left represents Spearman Rho correlation coefficients. Dark grey is indicative either of a Rho coefficient close to + 1 (positive correlation) or a Rho coefficient closer to -1 (negative correlation). White indicates an absence of correlation (coefficient equal to 0). (B) Matrice on the right displays the corresponding p-value for each Spearman correlation coefficient on the left. As expected, C-peptide, insulin and triglycerides show a significant correlation with BMI scores. Other statistically significant correlations included : LDL-C and its core protein Apo B, non-HDL cholesterol and LDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol and Apo B. Neither PCSK9, ANGPTL3 nor lipoprotein (a) show significant correlation with the rest of the lipid panel components. ANGPTL3 levels, however, appear to be significantly associated, at least partially (Rho = 0.30), with age (p-value = 0.04, n = 46).

In the present study, we investigated the levels of PCSK9, ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) in women with breast diseases of different levels of severity (benign, stage 0 and stage III cancers). We also investigated whether these lipid-related proteins were associated to the lipid profile or breast disease severity. The main finding of this study is that PCSK9 levels increase along with the severity of the breast disease, a finding that warrants confirmation in a larger cohort.

Severity of the breast disease versus the lipid panel

Although it is acknowledged that cholesterol is essential for tumor growth [61, 62], contradictory findings have been reported on the association between circulating lipoprotein levels and breast cancer risks [8, 11]. In the present cohort of women, none of the lipid parameters (total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, Apo B) was correlated to the severity of the breast disease (Table 3), a finding either explained by I) an insufficient power to detect changes in the lipid profile or II) a lack of association. Our study is in line with an analysis of the Women's Health Study that evaluated the prospective association of cancers (breast n = 864, colorectal n = 198, lung n = 190) with lipid profiles in 15,602 women. While lipids were associated with lung and colorectal cancer risks, no association was obtained between lipids and breast cancer risks [12]. Nevertheless, a study published in 2008 by Shah et al including 125 women with breast cancer, 30 with benign lesions of the breast and 90 controls indicated that alterations in the lipid profile showed a significant correlation with breast cancer risks, disease status, and treatment outcome [63]. The results of Shah et al were partly corroborated by a meta-analysis including fifteen prospective cohort studies involving 1,189,635 participants and 23,369 breast cancers. This meta-analysis suggested that triglycerides may be inversely associated with breast cancer risks while HDL-C might protect against breast cancer in postmenopausal women [64].

Clear evidence of a correlation between blood cholesterol levels and breast tumor histological features is still missing [65]. Co-existing physiological conditions, such as an underlying metabolic syndrome, post-menopausal status or chemotherapy, can influence the levels of circulating lipids and consequently blur the association between lipid profile and breast cancer prognosis [63, 66–68].

ANGPTL3, Lp(a) and PCSK9 levels versus the lipid panel

No correlations were obtained between the the levels of (ANGPTL3, Lp(a) or PCSK9 and the lipid profile (Fig. 4A). The lack of association between Lp(a) levels and LDL particles is not an unexpected finding. Although apolipoprotein (a) is physically bound to LDL particles, Lp(a) concentrations are genetically determined [52] and are not correlated to LDL-C [69]. The lack of correlation between ANGPTL3 and the lipid profile (Fig. 4A) is a finding in line with a Finnish study that found that ANGPTL3 serum protein concentrations did not predict lipid concentrations [70]. Similarly, despite an increase in PCSK9 levels between benign disease vs stage III cancers (Fig. 3C), no changes in LDL-C, non-HDL or Apo B were observed (Tables 2 and 3). This observation was consistent with correlation studies between baseline PCSK9 levels and cholesterol measurements in 55 patients with different stages of lung cancer [71]. While PCSK9 levels increased with cancer stage, cholesterol levels did not follow the same trend. We propose that either the rise of PCSK9 levels in our study was too small to lead to a significant increase in LDL-C levels, or that it did lead to a transient rise in LDL-C levels that was compensated by the uptake of LDL-C by cancer cells. Our study is not designed to explore these processes.

Breast disease severity versus ANGPTL3, Lp(a) and PCSK9 levels

Severity of breast cancer is assessed using a staging system based on how large the primary tumor is and how far it has spread within the body. Stages 0 to II tend to have a better long-term outcome compared to stages III to IV, which are qualified as “high-stage” cancers.

In our study, no statistical differences in ANGPTL3 or Lp(a) levels were observed between groups of increasing breast disease severity (Table 3, Figs. 1 and 2). This lack of association could be attributed to a low statistical power or a real absence of correlation with disease severity. The observation of a significant association between severity of breast disease and PCSK9 levels (Table 3, Figs. 3B and 3C) points toward a potentially important effect of PCSK9 in cancer, the mechanism of which deserves to be further investigated.

Our findings are in line with results reported in other human cancers. A recent in vivo study has shown that patients with gastric cancers had higher plasma levels of PCSK9 compared to age-matched healthy controls [72]. Other studies have advocated that PCSK9 could be a prognostic marker for advanced non-small cell lung cancer [73] and for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy [71]. Combined with the present results, these studies support the need to confirm the association between PCSK9 elevation and enhanced cancer aggressivity.

Origin of circulating PCSK9

Our study was not designed to address the origin of the extra levels of PCSK9 measured in advanced breast cancers. A major organ responsible for PCSK9 levels in circulation is the liver, which is in charge of regulating cholesterolemia. A possibility would be that tumoral cholesterol uptake leads to a transient decrease in cholesterolemia which could trigger hepatic secretion of PCSK9. Higher PCSK9 levels would compensate tumoral cholesterol uptake and maintain cholesterolemia, without any apparent changes in the lipid profile, as observed in our study. Whether or not circulating levels of PCSK9 can partly originate from the tumor itself is an open question that needs to be addressed.

PCSK9 and tumor progression

A recent study by Suh et al showed that nucleoprotein Ahnak mediated B16F10 melanoma cells mestatasis in mice via enhanced PCSK9 expression [74]. Actual data tend to support a pathogenic and pro-tumoral role for PCSK9, by both maintaining cholesterol supplies and by promoting MHC-I degradation on tumor cells, favoring immune escape of tumors [32]. Whether the increase in PCSK9 plays an active role in the progression of breast cancer requires further investigation. Comparing tumoral levels of PCSK9, MHC-I and HLA-C using standard methods (ex: ELISA) in tumors of increasing disease severity could help decipher the role of PCSK9 in tumors.

Limitations

The present study was performed on a limited amount of plasma samples (fourteen at the benign stage, nine at the premalignant stage and twenty-three stage III breast cancers). Due to the limited availability of samples, the control group consisted of women having a benign breast disease grouped with samples from women with a stage 0 breast cancer. While such a merge of non-cancerous samples with early-stage cancerous samples to form a control group may have blurred associations between PCSK9 and breast disease severity (Fig. 1C), a statistically significant association was obtained once samples were stratified according to breast disease severity (Figs. 3B and Table 3). A significant difference in HDL-cholesterol (1.3 mmol/L vs 1.8 mmol/L, p = 0.01) was observed between the benign disease of the breast group and the stage 0 breast cancers (Table 1). However, HDL is not associated with PCSK9 (Fig. 4A) and therefore this difference is not likely to invalidate our findings. HDL values in all groups are in the normal range for women (1.3 mmol/L and above). The lack of association between breast cancer stage and levels of ANGPTL3 or Lp(a) could be due to lack of statistical power. Despite a low number of samples, a statistically significant increase in PCSK9 levels was detected with increased severity of breast disease. If our finding is confirmed in a larger study, PCSK9 increase in breast cancer is likely to be an important mechanism of progression (cholesterol supplies, immune escape through tumoral MHC-I degradation) detectable even in our small cohort. Information on medications such as statins was unknown, which is a limitation since statins may change levels of both PCSK9 and circulating lipid levels. Finally, ethnical origins of women were not documented.

In summary, PCSK9 levels tend to increase with the severity of breast cancer in our cohort of 46 women. This association was not observed for Lp(a) and ANGPTL3, two other lipid-related biomarkers for which targeted therapies are available. Considering that PCSK9 degrades MHC-I and thus promotes immune escape of tumor cells, confirmation of increased PCSK9 levels with breast cancer severity in a larger cohort of patients is warranted and could pave the way for repurposing trials using available PCSK9 inhibitors in breast cancer.

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to the staff of the Core Laboratories of the Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus and of the CHUL for their help with measurements of biomarkers available in clinical laboratories. This work has been supported by an establishment grant from the Oncology Research axis of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre and the Medicine faculty of Laval University. Plasma samples were provided by the tissue and data biobank of the Cancer Research Centre, the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS), and the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation, affiliated with the Canadian Tissue Repository Network.

Funding

This project was funded with an establishment grant for new investigators of the Oncology research axis from the CHU de Québec.

Author’s contributions

A. Gangloff devised the rationale, the project and the main conceptual ideas. A. Gangloff and C. Diorio planned the logistic details related to the serum samples lipids profiling at the clinical platform. C.Diorio’s biobank provided the plasma samples needed for all the experiments. F-H. Joncas undertook the required procedures and correspondence with the ethical committee for compliance with the ethical regulations surrounding manipulation of the human samples. F-H. Joncas and E. Wong Chong performed the quantitations of ANGPTL3 and PCSK9 by ELISA assays. C. Diorio and E. Wong Chong performed the statistical analyses. A. Gangloff and E. Wong Chong wrote the paper with input from all authors. N.G. Seidah, F. Calon, C. Diorio, F-H. Joncas, E. Wong Chong and A. Gangloff discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets analyzed for the current study are not publicly available (confidentiality issues) but can be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics Declarations

Ethical Approval and Consent to participate. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the CHU de Québec (2021-5624).

Consent for publication. Not applicable.

Competing interests. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Cruz, P.M.R., et al. The role of cholesterol metabolism and cholesterol transport in carcinogenesis: a review of scientific findings, relevant to future cancer therapeutics. Frontiers in pharmacology, 2013. 4, 119 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00119.
Ding, X., et al., The role of cholesterol metabolism in cancer. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2019. 9(2): p. 219–227.
Huang, B.L., B.L. Song, and C.Q. Xu, Cholesterol metabolism in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. NATURE METABOLISM, 2020. 2(2): p. 132–141.
Xu, H.J., et al., Cholesterol metabolism: New functions and therapeutic approaches in cancer. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER, 2020. 1874(1).
Cedo, L., et al., HDL and LDL: Potential New Players in Breast Cancer Development. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019. 8(6).
Gallagher, E.J., et al., Elevated tumor LDLR expression accelerates LDL cholesterol-mediated breast cancer growth in mouse models of hyperlipidemia. ONCOGENE, 2017. 36(46): p. 6462–6471.
Guan, X.F., et al., Emerging roles of low-density lipoprotein in the development and treatment of breast cancer. LIPIDS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2019. 18.
Johnson, K.E., et al., The relationship between circulating lipids and breast cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study. PLOS Medicine, 2020. 17(9): p. e1003302.
Mooberry, L.K., et al., Targeting the SR-B1 Receptor as a Gateway for Cancer Therapy and Imaging. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2016. 7.
dos Santos, C.R., et al., Plasma level of LDL-cholesterol at diagnosis is a predictor factor of breast tumor progression. BMC CANCER, 2014. 14.
Nowak Christoph, C. and J. Arnlov, A Mendelian randomization study of the effects of blood lipids on breast cancer risk. Nature Communications. 9(1).
Chandler, P.D., et al., Lipid biomarkers and long-term risk of cancer in the Women’s Health Study. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2016. 103(6): p. 1397–1407.
Beeghly-Fadiel, A., et al., A Mendelian randomization analysis of circulating lipid traits and breast cancer risk. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020. 49(4): p. 1117–1131.
Touvier, M., et al., Cholesterol and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2015. 114(3): p. 347–357.
Llanos, A.A., et al., CHOLESTEROL, LIPOPROTEINS, AND BREAST CANCER RISK IN AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMEN. ETHNICITY & DISEASE, 2012. 22(3): p. 281–287.
Borgquist, S., et al., Apolipoproteins, lipids and risk of cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016. 138(11): p. 2648–2656.
Luo, J., H. Yang, and B.-L. Song, Mechanisms and regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2020. 21(4): p. 225–245.
Seidah, N.G. and A. Prat, The biology and therapeutic targeting of the proprotein convertases. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2012. 11(5): p. 367–383.
McNutt, M.C., T.A. Lagace, and J.D. Horton, Catalytic activity is not required for secreted PCSK9 to reduce low density lipoprotein receptors in HepG2 cells. J Biol Chem, 2007. 282(29): p. 20799–803.
Sabatine, M.S., et al., Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017. 376(18): p. 1713–1722.
Schwartz, G.G., et al., Effect of alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, on long-term cardiovascular outcomes following acute coronary syndromes: Rationale and design of the ODYSSEY Outcomes trial. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014. 168(5): p. 682–689.
Schwartz, G.G., et al., Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018. 379(22): p. 2097–2107.
Ray, K.K., et al., Two Phase 3 Trials of Inclisiran in Patients with Elevated LDL Cholesterol. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020. 382(16): p. 1507–1519.
Momtazi-Borojeni, A.A., et al., Anti-tumor activity of a nanoliposomal anti-PCSK9 vaccine in BALB/c mice bearing 4T1 breast cancer. 2019.
Momtazi-Borojeni, A.A., et al., Effects of immunization against PCSK9 in an experimental model of breast cancer. ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019. 15(3): p. 570–579.
Zhang, S.Z., et al., PCSK9 promotes tumor growth by inhibiting tumor cell apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2021. 10(1).
Mahboobnia, K., et al., PCSK9 and cancer: Rethinking the link. BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2021. 140.
Bonaventura, A., et al., PCSK9 as a new player in cancer: New opportunity or red herring? Curr Med Chem, 2021.
Yuan, J., et al., Potentiating CD8 + T cell antitumor activity by inhibiting PCSK9 to promote LDLR-mediated TCR recycling and signaling. Protein & Cell, 2021. 12(4): p. 240–260.
Seidah, N.G. and A. Prat, The multifaceted biology of PCSK9. Endocr Rev, 2021.
Almeida, C.R., B.H. Ferreira, and I.F. Duarte, Targeting PCSK9: a promising adjuvant strategy in cancer immunotherapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2021. 6(1): p. 111.
Liu, X.J., et al., Inhibition of PCSK9 potentiates immune checkpoint therapy for cancer. NATURE, 2020. 588(7839): p. 693-+.
DeVette, C.I., et al., A pipeline for identification and validation of tumor-specific antigens in a mouse model of metastatic breast cancer. OncoImmunology, 2020. 9(1): p. 1685300.
Tu, M.M., et al., Immunosurveillance and Immunoediting of Breast Cancer via Class I MHC Receptors. CANCER IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017. 5(11): p. 1016–1028.
Kersten, S., Physiological regulation of lipoprotein lipase. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 2014. 1841(7): p. 919–933.
Basu, D. and I.J. Goldberg, Regulation of lipoprotein lipase-mediated lipolysis of triglycerides. CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY, 2020. 31(3): p. 154–159.
Kersten, S., ANGPTL3 as therapeutic target. CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY, 2021. 32(6): p. 335–341.
Su, X. and D.Q. Peng, New insights into ANGPLT3 in controlling lipoprotein metabolism and risk of cardiovascular diseases. LIPIDS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2018. 17.
Arca, M., L. D'Erasmo, and I. Minicocci, Familial combined hypolipidemia: angiopoietin-like protein-3 deficiency. CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY, 2020. 31(2): p. 41–48.
Tarugi, P., S. Bertolini, and S. Calandra, Angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) deficiency and familial combined hypolipidemia. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019. 33(2): p. 73–81.
Gaudet, D., et al., ANGPTL3 Inhibition in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017. 377(3): p. 296–297.
Chen, P.Y., et al., Angiopoietin-Like Protein 3 (ANGPTL3) Modulates Lipoprotein Metabolism and Dyslipidemia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2021. 22(14).
Raal, F.J., et al., Evinacumab for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020. 383(8): p. 711–720.
Koyama, T., et al., ANGPTL3 is a novel biomarker as it activates ERK/MAPK pathway in oral cancer. CANCER MEDICINE, 2015. 4(5): p. 759–769.
Bao, Y., et al., Angiopoietin-like protein 3 blocks nuclear import of FAK and contributes to sorafenib response. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018. 119(4): p. 450–461.
Xia, J., et al., Association of Lipoprotein (a) variants with risk of cardiovascular disease: a Mendelian randomization study. LIPIDS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2021. 20(1).
Iannuzzo, G., et al., Lipoprotein(a) Where Do We Stand? From the Physiopathology to Innovative Therapy. BIOMEDICINES, 2021. 9(7).
Maranhao, R.C., et al., Lipoprotein (a): Structure, Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2014. 103(1): p. 76–83.
Bennet, A., et al., Lipoprotein(a) levels and risk of future coronary heart disease: large-scale prospective data. Arch Intern Med, 2008. 168(6): p. 598–608.
Erqou, S., et al., Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality. Jama, 2009. 302(4): p. 412–23.
Kamstrup, P.R., et al., Genetically elevated lipoprotein(a) and increased risk of myocardial infarction. Jama, 2009. 301(22): p. 2331–9.
Schmidt, K., et al., Structure, function, and genetics of lipoprotein (a). J Lipid Res, 2016. 57(8): p. 1339–59.
Marrer Émilie, É., et al., Lipoprotein(a) plasma levels and the risk of cancer: the PRIME study. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. 22(3): p. 286–93.
Kökoglu, E.E., et al., Elevated serum Lp(a) levels in the early and advanced stages of breast cancer. CANCER BIOCHEMISTRY BIOPHYSICS, 1994. 14(2): p. 133–6.
Gaeta, G., et al., Sex hormones and lipoprotein(a) concentration. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, 2011. 20(2): p. 221–238.
Xu Jing, J., et al., Hyperlipoproteinemia (a) is associated with breast cancer in a Han Chinese population. Medicine, 2020. 99(38).
Orsó, E. and G. Schmitz, Lipoprotein(a) and its role in inflammation, atherosclerosis and malignancies. Clin Res Cardiol Suppl, 2017. 12(Suppl 1): p. 31–37.
Dibaba, D.T., et al., Association between obesity and biomarkers of inflammation and metabolism with cancer mortality in a prospective cohort study. Metabolism - Clinical and Experimental, 2019. 94: p. 69–76.
Cserni, G., et al., The new TNM-based staging of breast cancer. Virchows Archiv, 2018. 472(5): p. 697–703.
Amin, M.B., et al., The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2017. 67(2): p. 93–99.
Llaverias, G., et al., Role of Cholesterol in the Development and Progression of Breast Cancer. The American Journal of Pathology, 2011. 178(1): p. 402–412.
Kuzu, O.F., M.A. Noory, and G.P. Robertson, The Role of Cholesterol in Cancer. Cancer Research, 2016. 76(8): p. 2063.
Franky Dhaval, S., et al., Significance of Alterations in Plasma Lipid Profile Levels in Breast Cancer. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 2008. 7(1): p. 33–41.
Ni Haibo, H., H. Liu, and R. Gao, Serum Lipids and Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. PLoS ONE, 2015. 10(11).
Jin, W., et al., The correlation between blood lipids and clinicopathological features of breast cancer in young females. Gland Surgery, 2020. 9(5): p. 1443–1449.
Buono, G., et al., Metabolic syndrome and early stage breast cancer outcome: results from a prospective observational study. Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. 182(2): p. 401–409.
Howson, C.P., D. Kinne, and E.L. Wynder, Body weight, serum cholesterol, and stage of primary breast cancer. Cancer, 1986. 58(11): p. 2372–2381.
Tian, W., et al., Changes in lipid profiles during and after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in women with early-stage breast cancer: A retrospective study. PLOS ONE, 2019. 14(8): p. e0221866.
Fatica, E.M., et al., Measuring the contribution of Lp(a) cholesterol towards LDL-C interpretation. Clinical Biochemistry, 2020. 86: p. 45–51.
Tikka, A., J. Metso, and M. Jauhiainen, ANGPTL3 serum concentration and rare genetic variants in Finnish population. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2017. 77(8): p. 601–609.
Xie, M., et al., Low baseline plasma PCSK9 level is associated with good clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Thoracic Cancer. n/a(n/a).
Xu, B., et al., Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Promotes Gastric Cancer Metastasis and Suppresses Apoptosis by Facilitating MAPK Signaling Pathway Through HSP70 Up-Regulation. Frontiers in Oncology, 2021. 10(2830).
Bonaventura, A., F. Grossi, and F. Montecucco, PCSK9 is a promising prognostic marker in patients with advanced NSCLC. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, 2020. 69(3): p. 491–492.
Suh, J.M., et al., Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin Type 9 is required for Ahnak-mediated metastasis of melanoma into lung epithelial cells. Neoplasia, 2021. 23(9): p. 993–1001.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Circulating levels of PCSK9, ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) in stage III breast cancers

Archived Versions:

Version 2

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Material And Method

Results

Biochemical parameters of the control and the stage III breast cancer (cases) groups

Correlation analyses between all variables

Discussion

Origin of circulating PCSK9

PCSK9 and tumor progression

Limitations

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Archived Versions:

Version 2

Version 1