All optical encoders are realized by using Gaussian continuous signals with an operating wavelength of 1550 nm. As the ports I1 to I4 are used to input the light to the structure, we stimulate the structure by passing the light through one of the port at a time and examine the ports O1 and O2 as they are used to obtain the light out from the structure.
Case 1: I1 port is active.
The input power is applied to port I1, and power applied in the other input ports are zero as shown in Fig. 5.a. In this case both the output must be zero. Hence in case 1 according to the proposed structure the input does not find the way to the output ports O1 and O 2 as the port I1 waveguide is not connected to the output ports. Hence obtained output is almost equal to zero as shown in Fig. 5.b and Fig. 5.c. In order to reduce the size of the structure, the port I1 is chosen as a short-waveguide.
Figure 5.b and 5.c shows the output at observation point O1 and O2are 0.03 and 0.06 respectively, which is almost equal to zero as shown in below table.
|
I1
|
I2
|
I3
|
I4
|
O1
|
O2
|
Output
|
Pin
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.03
|
0.06
|
Case 2: I2 port is active
In this case I2 port power is Pin and the power applied to the other ports are zero as shown in the Fig. 6.a.When the input is applied, the maximum amount of the input power reaches the O1 output port through the Nano resonator 1 as shown in Fig. 6.b and a small percentage of power passes to the O2 output port as shown in Fig. 6.c.
|
I1
|
I2
|
I3
|
I4
|
O1
|
O2
|
output
|
0
|
Pin
|
0
|
0
|
0.473
|
0.059
|
The above table shows the simulation results when I2 is active.
Case 3: I3 port is active
In this case I3 port power is Pin and other ports power are zero as shown in Fig. 7.a. When the input power is applied to the I3 port, it reaches the O1 and O2 output ports through the Nano resonator 1 and Nano resonator 2 as shown in the Fig. 7.b. and 7.c. respectively.
The below table shows the simulation results when I3 is active.
|
I1
|
I2
|
I3
|
I4
|
O1
|
O2
|
output
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Pin
|
0.461
|
0.461
|
Case 4: I4 port is active
In this case I4 port power is Pin and other ports power is zero as shown in Fig. 8.a.When the input is applied, the maximum amount of the input power reaches the O2 output port through the Nano resonator 2 and a small percentage of power passes to the O1 output port as shown in the Fig. 8.b and 8.c.
|
I1
|
I2
|
I3
|
I4
|
O1
|
O2
|
output
|
0
|
0
|
Pin
|
0
|
0.060
|
0.515
|
Table 2
Truth table of all-optical 4 to 2 encoder.
|
I1
|
I2
|
I3
|
I4
|
O1
|
O2
|
Output1
|
Pin
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Output1
|
0
|
Pin
|
0
|
0
|
0.473
|
0.059
|
Output1
|
0
|
0
|
Pin
|
0
|
0.461
|
0.461
|
Output1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Pin
|
0.060
|
0.515
|
Table 2 represents the summary of output obtained in all the four cases. As shown in the above table, we can cross verify the values with the table 1.
The Fig. 9 represents the contrast ratio of designed encoder by varying the lattice constant. Initially the material Si is considered and varied the lattice constant by keeping the rod radius and radius of nano resonators constant and calculated the contrast ratio for different lattice constants. Secondly the material Ge is considered and varied the lattice constant by keeping the rod radius and the radius of nano resonators constant and determined the contrast ratio. From the above it is clear that the proposed encoder gives good results with the Si material.
Table 3
comparison of the proposed optical 4 to 2 encoder results with previous work done so far.
References
|
Lattice
structure
|
Encoder type
|
Material
|
Contrast ratio
(dB)
|
Dimension in µm2
|
9
|
Square
|
4 to 2
|
Si
|
7.84
|
3795
|
11
|
Triangular
|
4 to 2
|
Si
|
15
|
625
|
12
|
Rectangular
|
4 to 2
|
GaAs
|
-
|
1927
|
13
|
square
|
4 to 2
|
si
|
|
1225
|
14
|
square
|
4 to 2
|
si
|
-
|
240.5
|
15
|
Hexagonal
|
4 to 2
|
Si
|
5.7
|
218.2
|
16
|
Square
|
4 to 2
|
Si
|
9.2
|
795.6
|
17
|
square
|
4 to 2
|
BTO
|
7.11
|
174.24
|
19
|
Rectangular
|
4 to 2
|
si
|
-
|
800
|
20
|
Hexagonal
|
4 to 2
|
Si
|
6
|
132
|
Present work
|
Hexagonal
|
4 to 2
|
Si
|
9.25
|
119.34
|
From the above table, it is very clear that the proposed 4:2 encoder has high contrast ratio as well as small dimension.