Ecotourism through the perception of forest villagers: Understanding via mediator effects using structural equation modeling

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1424269/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Ecotourism through the perception of forest villagers: Understanding via mediator effects using structural equation modeling

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1424269/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Ecotourism activities play an important role in providing economic gain to villagers living in forest ecosystems. Successful sustainable forest management is made possible through the environmental responsibility of the stakeholders and the support of the local inhabitants of the region. Contemporary studies conducted in ecotourism have focused on meeting regional expectations by assessing the satisfaction levels and attitudes of tourists and evaluating hotel management services, but have excluded the perspective of the rural people in the region. Using causal models and mediation effects, this study attempted to explore the attitudes of forest villagers, as the most important interest group, toward ecotourism activities in Turkey. Structural equation modeling and bootstrap methods were applied to identify key concepts related to ecotourism including the mediation effects between income opportunities and ecotourism satisfaction as perceived by the forest villagers regarding perceived negative effects and insufficient services. According to the results of the research, it was determined that, despite the perceived negative effects of ecotourism activities by the forest villagers, income opportunities made a strong positive contribution to their perceived ecotourism satisfaction. Study results offer significant implications for policymakers and ecotourism planners for decreasing pressure on forest ecosystems through participatory forest management approaches to sustainable development in rural areas associated with forest ecosystems.

Ecosystem services

forest villagers

sustainable rural development

structural equation modeling

Turkey

Forest ecosystems are critical areas throughout the world that contribute to several United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (Swamy et al. 2018). Forest ecosystems provide many services, especially as sources of wood raw materials, non-wood forest products, and as environmentally sensitive areas for recreation and for enjoying the aesthetic qualities and fresh air, etc. (Oztürk et al. 2009; Deniz and Paletto 2018). Ecotourism is one of the important services provided by forest resources (Chiu et al. 2014). For a better understanding of the ecotourism concept, it is necessary to examine accounts describing the periods when environmental concerns began to arise. In this regard, the report titled “The Limits to Growth” drew attention in the early 1970s. It explained for the first time that a sustainable environment for people could be achieved through sustainable development (Meadows et al. 1972). Subsequent reports, including “Our Common Future”, “Agenda 21”, and “The Rio Declaration”, are important milestones in drawing up a comprehensive framework that can achieve sustainable development by establishing a delicate balance in the use of the environment and natural resources (Evin and Demiral 2018; Kalaitan and Stybel 2021). Since the declaration of the “World Ecotourism Year” in 2002 by the UN World Tourism Organization (WTO), many researchers have defined the concept of ecotourism by emphasizing that it should be carried out by environmentally responsible people, and keywords were formulated such as environmental sustainability, respect for nature, generating income in rural areas, welfare economy, rural development, etc. (Fennell 2013; TIES 2015; Kalaitan and Stybel 2021). The “Paris Agreement” and the “Green Deal” are crucial developments for ecotourism because they are the latest important documents to determine and apply the means to reach a sustainable future. All these studies point out that environmental sustainability and sustainable development are achievable by developing the welfare of the local inhabitants and carrying out effective green economic practices while at the same time protecting natural resources (Yang et al. 2020).

Studies conducted to determine the demographic characteristics of ecotourists in recent years have revealed the profile of this type of tourist. Eco tourists are a highly educated, middle-aged group of experienced tourists having a high average income, interested in gastronomy and culture, and who conduct research about travel (Björk 2000; Rezaei et al. 2018). Unlike those who travel to European countries, in Turkey, young and middle-aged people participate more in ecotourism activities (Gültekin, et al. 2017; Bu et al. 2021). However, in terms of ecosystem services, ecotourism activities raise important concerns in Turkey, as they mostly take place in protected, environmentally sensitive, natural forest and rural areas (Celik 2018). Rural people living in the immediate vicinity of Turkey's forests, according to Forest Law no. 6831, are designated as “forest villagers” (Unal et al. 2021). Forest villagers have relatively low levels of income and education and the communities struggle with unemployment in Turkey. Their main livelihood is based on agricultural and forestry activities (Durkaya et al. 2017; Erdogan and Uyan Semerci 2020). When ecotourism activities are expanded, these developments can both reduce pressure on forest ecosystems and contribute to the well-being of rural households as alternative income opportunities (Gautam and Andersen 2016).

The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) created a reverse migration trend from big cities to rural areas. However, in terms of ecotourism activities, with the efforts to access healthy living and food, the focus was turned to agrotourism (Ling 2017; Herczeg 2020). In addition, with restrictions on mass tourism and the various risk factors due to the pandemic, a tendency emerged toward small-scale, green hotels in more isolated locations (Apostolakis et al. 2020). Transforming this new process into alternative sources of income for rural people and subsequently, reducing income inequality and the unemployment rate can lead to new initiatives (Huang and Liu 2017). Thus, this study aimed to propose policy recommendations for rural development by modeling the perceptions and attitudes of the forest villagers and explaining the mediation roles regarding tourists coming to the region. The main research questions (RQ) considered were:

RQ 1: Do ecotourism activities have an impact on the environmental concerns of forest villagers living in rural areas of Turkey?

RQ 2: What are the mediation roles between perceived revenue and ecotourism satisfaction?

Conceptual Framework

Ecotourism has evolved over time by expanding it with the concepts of natural, environmental, economic, social, and cultural structures as well as integrated rural tourism (IRT) and nature-based tourism (Lane 1994; Wineman et al. 2020) that include agro-tourism, village tourism, sustainable tourism, and tourism activities in rural areas (Nair et al. 2015; Lee and Jan 2018; Dinis et al. 2019; Surjanti et al. 2020). Rural tourism activities with similar definitions carried out in the study area have been evaluated within the scope of ecotourism.

Since the conceptual framework of this study aimed to determine the level of knowledge of rural people about ecotourism activities and model their perceptions and attitudes towards ecotourism components together with mediation roles, it was more appropriate to establish the conceptual framework within this scope. In terms of terrestrial ecosystems and the forest areas in Turkey, the main elements of the objective are of key importance for rural communities settled in sensitive environmental ecosystems (Gültekin et al. 2013; Gültekin et al. 2014; Gültekin 2019). This aspect of the study is significantly related to eliminating unemployment, and poverty and promoting the protection of forest resources, both of which are among the UN SDGs. All manner of production and commercial activities to be carried out in such areas of importance should be planned, implemented, and monitored by taking into account the balance of the ecosystem (Jamrozy and Lawonk 2017; Dinis et al. 2019; Pain et al. 2021).

The response of the local inhabitants to IRT development is an important factor in ecotourism planning and marketing strategies (Saxena and Ilbery 2010). With ecotourism activities, the relations between the locals and the tourists visiting the region can be a positive tool that benefits sustainable development through the opportunity of an alternative income (Huang and Liu 2017; Kibria et al. 2020). Studies have reported that these income opportunities from ecotourism activities enable local people to improve their standard of living (Hayati and Bahtera 2020). Moreover, ecotourism activities are known to have a positive effect on cultural exchange and rural development by initiating interaction with the local people, thus increasing their earnings and resulting in a more positive ecotourism satisfaction level (Kim and Park 2017; Kry et al. 2020). One of the main aims of this study was to use causal models to explain the effects of ecotourism activities on the welfare of forest villagers. Therefore, the first hypothesis to be tested within the scope of the study can be expressed as follows: H1: Perceived revenue opportunities (PRO) positively associated with perceived ecotourism satisfaction (PES).

Current studies have found different perceptions and attitudes towards ecotourism activities (Juvan and Dolnicar 2016). The main phenomena involve negative effects experienced by the local inhabitants as a result of interactions with tourists coming to the region (Muresan et al. 2016; Kandel et al. 2020). Some studies have shown that this situation negatively affects the development of ecotourism and recreational activities (Cakir et al. 2016). Although the positive values expected by the participants as a result of ecotourism activities are high, some negative perceptions adversely affect the expectations and satisfaction of ecotourists (Chan and Baum 2007; Huang and Liu 2017; Lee and Jan 2018). In addition, problems and imbalances in ecotourism services can also lead to a negative perception of the quality of service in ecotourism activities (Yusof et al. 2014; Huang and Liu 2017). Perceived negative effects (PNE) were among the mediation role factors defined in the study, and the hypotheses to be tested were determined as follows: H2: Perceived revenue opportunities (PRO) negatively associated with PNE, and H3: Perceived negative effects (PNE) negatively associated with PES.

As the income level and welfare of the local people increase, efforts will be made to increase the satisfaction of the ecotourists by giving more attention to ecotourism services (Kibria et al. 2020; Kry et al. 2020). In this context, another purpose of this study was to identify the root problems underlying the relations between PRO and PES by determining the views of forest villagers towards ecotourism. Consequently, it was necessary to test the factors that were thought to underpin and explain the local perception of ecotourism using mediation roles between PRO and PES through the following hypotheses: H4: Perceived insufficient services (PUS) take part a mediator effect of perceived revenue opportunities (PRO) on PES, H5: Perceived revenue opportunities negatively affect PUS, H6: Perceived insufficient services negatively affect PES, and H7: Perceived insufficient services negatively mediate the relationship between PRO and PES.

Study area

The target audience of the study consisted of the forest villagers living in Düzce Province, which has a large number of ecotourism activities and potential destinations. Approximately half (49%) of Düzce Province, in the western Black Sea Region of Turkey, is covered by forested areas where ecotourism activities are diverse and extensive (Gültekin et al. 2018). In addition, the research area was chosen because the transportation network from metropolitan cities such as Istanbul, Ankara, Bursa, Kocaeli, and Sakarya to this region is efficient and convenient, and those who visit ecotourism areas are also highly similar to the people living in the region. The wide variety of ecotourism activities in Düzce such as nature hikes, rafting, paragliding, botanical tours, trekking, agrarian tours, etc. are mostly carried out in forest areas and their immediate surroundings. These features increase the attractiveness of ecotourism in the region (Gültekin et al. 2013; Gültekin 2019).

Questionnaire design and analysis

The research population consisted of forest villagers living in the western Black Sea province of Düzce (Turkey), which encompasses 278 forest villages including a total population of 395,679 (TUIK 2020). Ecotourism-related scales and factors (Kiper et al. 2011; Oviedo-García et al. 2017; Huang and Liu 2017; Kim and Park 2017; Gültekin et al. 2017) were adapted to facilitate communication with the forest villagers in Düzce and used to analyze the relationships between PRO, PES, PNE, PUS, and mediation roles. The surveys were administered in the forest villages of Aydınpınar, Güzeldere, Samandere, and Yığılca, where ecotourism activities are carried out extensively in the forest areas. The developed questionnaire forms were applied between December 2018 and July 2019. The 5-point Likert type questionnaire form was designed in a way that all participants could easily understand and respond to it in 10–15 minutes. Therefore, as a result of the study, 420 questionnaire forms were obtained from inhabitants living in four different forest villages in Düzce.

According to the theoretical model and also to better explain the mediation roles between the latent variables, this study used structural equation modeling (SEM) along with bootstrap methodologies. Both techniques provide the ability to test all interrelationships, direct effects, and indirect effects simultaneously and to statistically control the hypotheses presented in the models (Danielson et al. 2001; Kline 2015). Moreover, the SEM approach enabled the comparison of empirical environmental data with a theoretical model (Gültekin 2022). The basic features of the SEM model provide the ability to estimate multiple interrelated dependent relationships and to represent unobserved variables in these relationships, while taking estimation measurement errors into account (Byrne 2010).

In order to evaluate the SEM models, the principal measurement criteria used in the study included: Chi-Square (C), Minimum Value of the Discrepancy Function (CMIN), Degrees of Freedom (DF), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Goodness of Fit Index (GFI), Normed Fit Index (NFI), Relative Fit Index (RFI), Incremental Fit Index (IFI), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), Root-Mean-Square Error Approximation (RMSEA), and Root Mean Residual (RMR). These values denoted the accepted goodness of fit (GOF) cutoff criteria determined in the structural models (Hu and Bentler 1999; Schumacker and Lomax 2004; Kline 2015; Gültekin 2022). In accordance with SEM methodology and theory, some error terms were correlated only with the same latent variable in order to achieve improved GOF values. By computing each scale separately, Cronbach’s α (reliability) values of higher than 0.60 could be achieved. Furthermore, the factor loadings demonstrated that the validity of the scales had exceeded the established lower limits. The SEM approach was implemented for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) by applying maximum likelihood (ML) estimation to evaluate the multi-dimensionality of PES, PRO, PUS, and PNE (Byrne 2010; Kline 2015).

The indirect effects and mediation model of the original sample were computed as well as the estimated parameters of the β bootstrap samples. In order to achieve improved results at a 95% confidence interval (CI), for the upper and lower bounds, 5000 samples from the original sample size were used (Efron and Tibshirani, 1985; Danielson et al. 2001). The SPSS 22 and AMOS 22 software programs were used to analyze all data.

Table 1 presents the basic demographic characteristics of the respondents. Each scale was assessed for reliability and validity in the first step of the analysis. Table 2 gives the CFA results and includes the scales and the items. The Cronbach’s α coefficient values for the PRO, PES, PUS, and PNE scales were 0.687, 0.789, 0.628, and 0.702, respectively, showing them to be sufficiently reliable and valid.

Table 1

Characteristic features of the respondents (N = 420)
Variables	Frequency (%)	Variables	Frequency (%)
Gender Male Female	298 (71) 122 (29)	Monthly income (US$) 500 and below	292 (69,5)
Age (years) 15–34 35–49 > 50	138 (32,9) 129 (30,7) 153 (36,4)	501–1000 1001–2000 More than 2001 Occupation	70 (16,7) 31 (7,4) 27 (6,4)
Educational level Middle school and below High school Graduate school	296 (70,5) 98 (23,3) 26 (6,2)	Farmer Housewife Self-employed Other (student, worker, etc.)	249 (59,3) 83 (19,8) 64 (15,2) 24 (5,7)

Table 2

The results of the confirmatory factor analysis with scales and items.
Scales and items	Factor Load	t-value	Cronbach’s α
Perceived Revenue Opportunities (PRO) Scale			0.687
PRO1: Tourists coming to the region provide income opportunities.	0.765	12.502
PRO2: I generate income by providing guidance services to tourists coming to the region.	0.828	12.636
PRO3: I earn income by selling local products to tourists coming to the region.	0.665	-
Perceived Ecotourism Satisfaction (PES) Scale			0.789
PES1: I am satisfied with the tourists coming to the region.	0.606	-
PES2: I want more tourists come to the region.	0.826	5.960
Perceived Insufficient Services (PUS) Scale			0.628
PUS1: Infrastructure facilities for tourists are insufficient.	0.775	3.866
PUS2: I feel inadequate in communicating with the tourists coming to the area.	0.553	-
Perceived Negative Effects (PNE) Scale			0.702
PNE1: Tourists coming to the region adversely affect the lifestyle of the local people. PNE2: Tourists coming to the region cause environmental pollution. PNE3: Tourists coming to the area harm the traditions of the local people. PNE4: Sometimes there is a dispute with the tourists coming to the region.	0.404 0.494 0.801 0.678	- 6.564 6.692 6.798

The path diagram presents the relationships between PES and PRO, where indicator variables are shown as rectangles and latent variables as ovals. A regression coefficient is indicated by each arrow from one latent or observed variable to another (Fig. 2). Each oval with an arrow to a latent or observed variable indicates the error term. Double-pointed arrows pointing between error terms indicate the covariances (Gültekin 2022). In the model, there were three observed, endogenous variables (PRO1-PRO3) and two observed variables (PES1-PES2), i.e., five observed variables. The eight unobserved variables included the endogenous variable (PES) and the unobserved, exogenous variables (PES and e1-e6). Thus, the total number of variables in the model was thirteen. The GOF values of the data were acceptable in the details of the hypothesized path model (DF = 4, CMIN = 17.102, p < 0.002, RMSEA = 0.088, RMR = 0.028, CMIN/DF = 4.275, NFI = 0.971, GFI = 0.984, TLI = 0.944, CFI = 0.977, and IFI = 0.978).

The data (β = 0.39, p < 0.002) supported Hypothesis 1 (“PRO is positively associated with PES”), i.e., that the PRO of the forest villagers significantly affected their PES. The PRO scale items state that the satisfaction level of rural people is highly correlated with their perception of “generating income by selling local products, earning money by providing guidance services, and providing income opportunities”. The responses of the forest villagers indicated that they were not adequately satisfied with the ecotourism opportunities in the region (PES1 mean = 3.68; PES2 mean = 3.95).

After the first stage of the SEM model, the complete multidimensional model and indirect effects of PNE and PUS were set up to achieve the mediator effects and the relationships between PRO, PES, PNE and PUS. The complete structural model can be seen in Fig. 3. There were a total of 29 variables in the model. The observed, endogenous variables in the model were PRO1-PRO3 (3 observed variables), PNE1-PNE4 (4 observed variables), PUS1-PUS3 (2 observed variables), and PES1-PES2 (2 observed variables). There were a total of 11 observed variables. The unobserved endogenous variables were PUS, PNE, and PES and the unobserved exogenous variables were PRO and e1-e14 (a total of 15 unobserved variables). The values of the full structured model for the model fit criteria were found as: DF = 38, CMIN = 68.350, p < 0.002, CMIN/DF = 1.799, RMR = 0.045, RMSEA = 0.044, GFI = 0.972, CFI = 0.971, NFI = 0.937, TLI = 0.958, and IFI = 0.971. These indices were used in the determination of the efficiency of the SEM models and indicated that the hypothesized path model fit was acceptable (Kline 2015). When the PUS and PNE were considered as mediators and included in the structural models, it confirmed that the relationship between the PRO and PES differed in the regression coefficient. Moreover, with the suppression effect, the regression coefficient was reduced from 0.39 to 0.32 (Agler and De Boeck 2017), i.e., when the complete model was regarded as being significant for the PRO and PES of the forest villagers, the PUS and PNE were highly effective. Table 3 presents the complete multidimensional model and indirect effects of PUS and PNE, and the total effects between PES (path c) and PRO. The estimates (bias-corrected 95% CI) of the indirect effects calculated via the bootstrap analysis using 5,000 replications revealed the significant mediator effects of the relationship between PES and PRO and PUS and PNE (β = 0.073, lower bound = 0.007, upper bound = 0.170). Significant correlations were also found between PES and PRO and PUS (paths a, b, d, and e) and PNE. When the responses of the forest villagers to the expressions on the PRO scale were examined, they would positively affect their PUS included: “lack of infrastructure and communication problems with the tourists. Nevertheless, the PNE scale drew some negative perceptions for forest villagers such as adversely affecting the lifestyle of the local people, environmental pollution concerns, and sometimes having conflicts”. The PRO-PUS-PNE-PES model indicated that forest villagers were quite attached to ecotourism components, even though there were some negative perceptions on their PRO and PES. For example, the PES scale suggested that “Rural people want to see more tourists in the region and they are satisfied with tourists coming to the region”. These expressions are particularly effective in understanding the PES level of the forest villagers.

Table 3

Results of complete mediation models.
	Result variables
	PES			PNE			PUS
	β		SE	β		SE	β		SE
PRO (path c)	0,244**		0,064
R²		0,317
PRO (path a)				-0,231**		0,051
R²					0,126
PRO (path d)							0,229**		0,071
R²								0,079
PNE (path b) PUS (path e)	-0,104* 0,213**		0,082 0,075
PRO (path c')	0,244**		0,064
R²		0,222**
Indirect effect	0,073** (0,007 − 0,170)
p < 0,05, *p < 0,001, SE: Standard error.

According to the PNE model “H₂: Perceived Revenue Opportunities are negatively associated with Perceived Negative Effects” is supported by the data (β = 0.529, p < 0.001). Hypothesis 2 predicted the negative direct effect of PRO on PNE. This can be explained as forest villagers’ PRO reduces their PNE. The following hypotheses were also supported according to the PNE and PUS models: “H₃: Perceived Negative Effects are negatively associated with Perceived Ecotourism Satisfaction”, “H₄: Perceived Insufficient Services play a mediating role on PES in the effect of Perceived Revenue Opportunities. H₅: Perceived Revenue Opportunities negatively affect Perceived Insufficient Services. H₆: Perceived Insufficient Services negatively affect Perceived Ecotourism Satisfaction. H₇: Perceived Insufficient Services negatively mediate the relationship between Perceived Revenue Opportunities and Perceived Ecotourism Satisfaction.”. In other words, at 95% CI, the indirect effect estimation was 0.073 and 0.007–0.170 between PRO and PES. This effect was significant. Hypothesis 3 predicted a negative direct effect of PNE on PES. Hypothesis 4 estimated a positive indirect effect of PUS on PRO and PES. Hypothesis 4 estimated a negative indirect effect of PNE on PES. However, Hypothesis 7 estimated a negative indirect effect of PUS on PES. These indirect effects implied that forest villagers exhibited both negative and positive dimensions, even if their PES level was positive.

Table 3 presents the complete multidimensional model and the indirect effects of PUS and PNE. The indirect effects and mediation model of the original sample were computed as well as the estimated parameters of the β bootstrap samples. For the upper and lower bounds, 5000 samples from the original sample size were used to achieve improved results at a 95% confidence interval (CI).

The total effects between PRO and PES can be seen in Table 3 (path c). The relationship between PRO and PES showed that the PNE and PUS had a mediating effect that was statistically significant (β = 0.073, lower bound = 0.007, upper bound = 0.170). Significant relationships were also found between PRO and PNE, PRO and PUS, PNE and PES, and PUS and PES (path a, b, d and e).

This research was aimed at understanding the attitudes and perceptions of forest villagers in the western Black Sea Region of Turkey concerning ecotourism activities in their region and at revealing the mediator effects in the relationship between PRO and PES. Results of this study uncovered both theoretical and practical implementations for further research. The first was related to the strong positive association by the forest villagers of PRO with PES and the second to their relatively higher association of PRO with PNE and PUS, negatively affecting unit PES. In general, the findings indicated that the PRO of the forest villagers exerted a positive direct effect, a negative indirect effect, and a positive total effect on PES.

The results of this study showed that active participation of forest villagers should be at the center of ecosystem-based functional planning approaches to be carried out within the scope of multiple-use forest management (Keleş et al. 2017). Gültekin et al. (2018) in their studies on this perspective emphasized that among the stakeholders, forest villagers should be associated with participatory approaches and “place attachment” in ecotourism planning. The findings of this study indicate that ecotourism activities that will ensure the development of forest villagers living in rural areas can be combined with the adaptation of agrotourism, hostel management, organic agricultural products and local food culture, and marketing of local handicraft products (Ciftcioglu 2021). Ecotourism can be developed by local governments via directing investments and leading activities in this regard. These opportunities can be used as a roadmap for implementing nature-based solutions in rural areas (Davies et al. 2021; Okan et al. 2016).

The education and income levels of the majority of rural societies such as forest villagers living in Turkey are low (Durkaya et al. 2017). The results of this study show that the forest villagers in the region do not have sufficient information about ecotourism activities due to lack of education. In this regard, basic entrepreneurship training related to environmental education, training courses for income-generating activities, and especially rural education studies can enable forest villagers to act more consciously toward ecotourism. In recent years, the concept of eco-entrepreneurship has come to the fore in facilitating the sustainability of ecotourism activities (Gültekin 2019). Developing ecotourism activities and putting them into operation with eco-entrepreneurship practices can be used as a tool to achieve more successful results and to reach the UNWTO poverty eradication target (Lee 2007). When forest ecosystem services and the well-being of villagers in both rural and forest areas are considered, they can be combined within several SDGs (SDG1, SDG15, SDG17).

Local people need to collaborate with the private sector and get the expand of the benefits to make certain the sustainable development and to increase the wellbeing of local communities (Angelica et al. 2010; Kiper et al. 2011). In this regard, forest villagers as local people can be supported by local governments, and ecotourism projects can be developed to carry out activities that will attract more tourists to the region. Promoting ecotourism activities to forest villagers allows them to take initiatives that will contribute to increasing their income. In this respect, the sustainable development of ecotourism can be used as a good practice tool in environmental sustainability (Guatam and Anderson 2016; Ciftcioglu 2021). Considering the forest villagers, who know the region very well, as field guides in ecotourism activities can be a good example of this initiative.

It is common for some conflicts to occur in the encounters between the rural community and the tourists visiting the region (Shasha et al. 2020). Socio-cultural factors are one of the most prominent reasons for conflicts between urban society and the rural people (Malik et al. 2016). Indeed, there is significant conflict in rural areas between local people and tourists because of the lack of knowledge and understanding between the stakeholders (Er et al. 2012). This study also demonstrated that despite some cultural differences and conflicts between these groups, according to the PES scale, there is still an average satisfaction level among forest villagers.

It is emphasized in the literature that employment, as one of the important components of sustainable development, is insufficient in rural areas where agricultural production activities are intense, and that there is a need for diversification of income sources in many different fields (Salman et al. 2021). In rural areas, there are barriers to economic growth, employment, and sustainable development, rural tourism, ecotourism, agricultural tourism, farm tourism, and so on. These can be overcome by supporting ecotourism opportunities. When studies on ecotourism and rural areas are examined; rural areas are seen to have positive effects on the physical and psychological health of urban individuals and to provide them with recreational and gastronomic opportunities, culture, etc. (Salem 2021). Global studies have been conducted on the importance of rural regions in terms of sustainable ecotourism and their roles in regional development. This study supports the importance of these issues with evidence through developed scales.

The sustainability agenda is about the effective and efficient use of ecosystem services in terms of improving the welfare of the rural population. Results of this study suggest that to ensure and enhance sustainable rural development, there need to be opportunities for the rural people. In order to ensure long-term sustainable ecotourism, forest villagers and all stakeholders need to establish and develop participatory cooperation (DasGupta and Shaw 2017). When the study area was evaluated, it was found necessary to develop rural tourism, nature-based tourism, and ecotourism activities with a forest villager-oriented and nature conservation-centered approach. The results of this study show that the forest villagers do not adequately perceive the components and basic features of ecotourism beyond their interest in ecotourism activities. However, forest villagers, who are seen as the key to sustainable development, should be included in the planning and implementation processes (Zengin et al. 2018). In this context, focusing on ecotourism governance would be one of the initial steps. Ecotourism investments and practices at the local scale under the leadership of local governments should be shown as good practical examples in terms of educating the local people, capacity building, and environmental sustainability. In this way, the participation of the forest villagers in ecotourism activities as well as in educational training will be encouraged.

When conducting pioneering pilot studies, it is necessary to eliminate the negative views of the forest villagers by using good practices and public and private sector investments. Thus, the participation and support of all stakeholders should be ensured via improved communication skills. This research also can serve as a benchmark for further forest-rural related studies.

The scales, structural models, and methods developed within the scope of the study enabled the perceptions and attitudes of rural people and the mediation effects to be determined. By applying them in different regions and conditions and adding other factors in terms of sustainable rural development, it would be possible to develop scales and policy implementations that could achieve better results.

Author contribution

YSG performed conceptualization, the methodology and formal analysis, data collection, curation and the calculation of the model, and original draft preparation. Author read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The author did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Data Availability

The entire dataset was presented in the manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate;

This research study is an original work and has not been published elsewhere in any language. Informed consent was obtained from the participants.

Consent for publication;

Consent was obtained from the individuals who participated in this study.

Competing interests;

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Agler R, De Boeck P (2017) On the interpretation and use of mediation: multiple perspectives on mediation analysis. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01984. 8:1984
Angelica M, Zambrano A, Broadbent EN, Durham WH (2010) Social and environmental effects of ecotourism in the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica: the Lapa Rios case. J Ecotourism 9(1):62–83
Apostolakis A, Jaffry S, Kourgiantakis M (2020) Examination of individual preferences for green hotels in Crete. Sustainability 12(20):8294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208294
Birben U, Gençay G (2018) Public interest versus forests. Cerne 24(4):360–368. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201824042570
Bu Y, Wang E, Yu Y (2021) Analysis on asymptotic stabilization of eco-compensation program for forest ecotourism stakeholders. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12703-5
Byrne B (2010) Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications and programming, 2nd edn. Routhledge Taylor & Francis Group, New Jersey (NJ)
Cakir G, Müderrisoğlu H, Kaya LG (2016) Assessing the effects of long-term recreational activities on landscape changes in Abant Natural Park. Turk J Res 27:453–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0141-x
Celik D (2018) Determination of the most suitable ecotourism activities with the analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Balamba Natural Park, Turkey. Appl Ecol Environ Res 16(4):4329–4355
Chan JKL, Baum T (2007) Ecotourists' perception of ecotourism experience in Lower Kinabatangan, Sabah, Malaysia. J Sustainable Tourism 15(5):574–590. https://doi.org/10.2167/jost679.0
Chiu YH, Lee W, Chen T (2014) Environmentally responsible behavior in ecotourism: Antecedents and implications. Tourism Manage 40:321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.013
Ciftcioglu GC (2021) Participatory and deliberative assessment of the landscape and natural resource social values of marine and coastal ecosystem services: the case of Kyrenia (Girne) Region from Northern Cyprus. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:27742–27756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12600-x
Cruz-González E, Vilalta-Alonso JA (2020) Structural equation model to predict the intention of stay to the local business group. Dyna 87(213):159–164
Danielsson J, Haan L, Peng L, Vries CG (2001) Using a bootstrap method to choose the sample fraction in tail ındex estimation. J Multivar Anal 76(2):226–248
DasGupta R, Shaw R (2017) Perceptive insight into incentive design and sustainability of participatory mangrove management: a case study from the Indian Sundarbans. J For Res 28:815–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0355-6
Davies C, Chen WY, Sanesi G, Lafortezza R (2021) The European Union roadmap for implementing nature-based solutions: A review. Environ Sci Policy 12149–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.018
Deniz T, Paletto A (2018) Effects of bioenergy production on environmental sustainability: a preliminary study based on expert opinions in Italy and Turkey. J Forestry Res 29(6):1611–1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0596-7
Dinis I, Simões O, Cruz C, Teodoro A (2019) Understanding the impact of intentions in the adoption of local development practices by rural tourism hosts in Portugal. J Rural Stud 72:92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.002
Durkaya A, Kaptan S, Durkaya B, Önal G, Erdoğmuş S (2017) Socio Economic and Socio Cultural State of Forest Villages and Highland Settlements and Conflicts (Example of Giresun and Manisa Region). J Bartin Fac Forestry 19(1):252–267. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/barofd/issue/27137/298152
Efron B, Tibshirani R (1985) The Bootstrap method for assessing statistical accuracy. Behaviormetrika 12:1–35
Er AC, Moorthy R, Lyndon N, Selvadurai S, Chong ST, Adam JH (2012) Perception of local community towards community-based ecotourism. 6:213Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences2
Erdoğan E, Uyan Semerci P (2020) COST CA18213 Rural NEETs in Turkey: 2009/2019 Overview
Evin H, Demiral B (2018) From Rio to Rio: a vicious circle. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences 4(1):82–91
Fennell D (2013) Contesting the zoo as a setting for ecotourism, and the design of a first principle. J Ecotourism 12(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2012.737796
Gautam Y, Andersen P (2016) Rural livelihood diversification and household well-being: Insights from Humla, Nepal. J Rural Stud 44:239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.001
Gültekin P, Gültekin YS, Uzun O (2013) Development of participatory ecotourism perception scale in Düzce Uğursuyu and Aksu watersheds. 5th landscape architecture congress. Adana, Turkey
Gültekin YS (2019) Evaluation of Yığılca local honey bee within the frames of rural development and eco-entrepreneurship. Düzce Univ J Sci Technol 7(1):911–921
Gültekin P, Gültekin YS, Uzun O (2014) Relationship between local people-ecotourism in participatory planning: case of Düzce Aydınpınar village. 3rd Nonwood Forest Products Symposium, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey
Gültekin YS, Gültekin P, Uzun O, Gök H (2017) Use of structural equation modeling in ecotourism: A model proposal. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 5(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/0.21533/pen.v5i2.102
Gültekin YS, Gültekin P, Uzun O, Gök H (2018) Stakeholder analysis in participatory ecotourism planning using structural equation modeling: a case study of Western Black Sea region. Düzce Univ J Forestry 14(2):33–56. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/611341
Gültekin YS (2019) Evaluation of Yığılca local honey bee within the frames of rural development and eco-entrepreneurship. Düzce Univ J Sci Technol 7(1):911–921
Gültekin YS, Kayacan B, Bentler PM (2021) Determination of stakeholders’ perception of stumpage sales policy in forest management directorate: a case study from western black sea region of Turkey. Fresen Environ Bull 30(1):135–147
Hayati L, Bahtera NI (2020) The role of mangrove ecotourism towards the environmental sustainability in Bangka Regency. IOP Conf Ser : Earth Environ Sci 599:012078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/599/1/012078
Herczeg SA (2020) Remigration of Romanians during the COVID-19 pandemic and the migration prospects for the post-pandemic era. Anuarul Institutului de Istorie »George Bariţiu« - Series HISTORICA - Supliment, LIX, 2: 529–538
Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J 6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huang YC, Liu C-HS (2017) Moderating and mediating roles of environmental concern and ecotourism experience for revisit intention. Int J Contemp Hospitality Manage 29(7):1854–1872. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2015-0677
Jamrozy U, Lawonk K (2017) The multiple dimensions of consumption values in ecotourism. Int J Cult Tourism Hospitality Res 11(1):18–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-09-2015-0114
Juvan E, Dolnicar S (2016) Measuring environmentally sustainable tourist behaviour. Annals of Tourism Research 59:30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2016.03.006
Kalaitan TV, Stybel VV (2021) Ecotourism and sustainable development. Prospects for Ukraine. Ukrainian J Ecol 11(1):373–383. https://doi.org/10.15421/2021_55
Kandel S, Harada K, Adhikari S, Dahal NK, Dhakal M (2020) Local perceptions of forest rules and interactions between rules, ecotourism, and human-wildlife conflicts: Evidence from Chitwan National Park. Nepal Tropics 29(1):25–39. https://doi.org/10.3759/tropics.MS19-07
Kayacan B, Gültekin YS (2012) Use of Structural equation modeling in solving socioeconomic problems in forestry, 3 edn. Congress of Socioeconomic Problems in Forestry, İstanbul, Turkey
Keleş S, Durusoy İ, Cakir G (2017) Analysis of the changes in forest ecosystem functions, structure and composition in the Black Sea region of Turkey. J For Res 28:329–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0322-2
Kibria ASMG, Behie A, Costanza R, Groves C, Farrell T (2020) Potentials of community-based-ecotourism to improve human wellbeing in Cambodia: an application of millennium ecosystem assessment framework. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World, Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1855606
Kim KH, Park DB (2017) Relationships among perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: community-based ecotourism in Korea. J Travel Tourism Mark 34:2:171–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2016.1156609
Kiper T, Özdemir G, Sağlam C (2011) Enviromental, socio-cultural and economical effects of ecotourism perceived by the local people in the northwestern Turkey: Kiyiköy case. Sci Res Essays 6(19):4009–4020. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE10.1059
Kline RB (2015) Principles and practice structural equation modeling, 4th edn. Routhledge Taylor & Francis Group, New Jersey (NJ)
Kry S, Sasaki N, Datta A, Abe I, Ken S, Tsusaka TW (2020) Assessment of the changing levels of livelihood assets in the Kampong Phluk community with implications for community-based ecotourism. Tourism Manage Perspect 34:100664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100664
Lane B (1994) What is rural tourism? J Sustainable Tourism 2:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669589409510680
Lee TH (2007) An ecotourism behavioural model of national forest recreation areas in Taiwan. Int Forestry Rev 9(3):771–785. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.9.3.771
Lee TH, Jan F-H (2018) Ecotourism behavior of nature-based tourists: an integrative framework. J Travel Res 57(6):792–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517717350
Ling M (Summer 2017) Returning to no home: educational remigration and displacement in rural China. Anthropol Q 90(3):715–742. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2017.0041
Malik MAS, Shah SA, Zaman K (2016) Tourism in Austria: biodiversity, environmental sustainability, and growth issues. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:24178–24194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7609-x
Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) The Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New York
Muresan IC, Oroian CF, Harun R, Arion FH, Porutiu A, Chiciudean GO, Todea A, Lile R (2016) Local residents’ attitude toward sustainable rural tourism development. Sustainability 8(1):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010100
Nair V, Munikrishnan UT, Rajaratnam SD, King N (2015) Redefining rural tourism in Malaysia: a conceptual perspective. Asia Pac J Tourism Res 20(3):314–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2014.889026
Okan T, Köse N, Arifoğlu E, Köse C (2016) Assessing ecotourism potential of traditional wooden architecture in rural areas: the case of Papart valley. Sustainability 8(10):974. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8100974
Oviedo-García M, Castellanos-Verdugo M, Vega-Vázquez M, Orgaz-Agüera F (2017) The mediating roles of the overall perceived value of the ecotourism site and attitudes towards ecotourism in sustainability through the key relationship ecotourism knowledge-ecotourist satisfaction. Int J Tourism Res 19:203–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2097
Oztürk A, Türker MF, Pak M (2009) Economic valuation of externalities linked to Turkish Forests. Afr J Agric Res 4(11):1251–1259. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR.9000191
Pain A, Marquardt K, Lindh A et al (2021) What Is Secondary about Secondary Tropical Forest? Rethinking Forest Landscapes. Hum Ecol 49:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00203-y
Rezaei N, Mirzaei R, Abbasi R (2018) A study on motivation differences among traditional festival visitors based on demographic characteristics, case study: Gol-Ghaltan festival, Iran. J Convention Event Tourism 19(2):120–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2017.1404952
Salem HS (2021) Evaluation of the stone and marble industry in Palestine: environmental, geological, health, socioeconomic, cultural, and legal perspectives, in view of sustainable development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:28058–28080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12526-4
Salman A, Jaafar M, Mohamad D et al (2021) Ecotourism development in Penang Hill: a multi-stakeholder perspective towards achieving environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13609-y
Saxena G, Ilbery B (2010) Developing integrated rural tourism: Actor practices in the English/Welsh border. J Rural Stud 26(3):260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.12.001
Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (2004) A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum. Associates Publishers, 2nd edition
Shasha ZT, Geng Y, Sun H et al (2020) Past, current, and future perspectives on eco-tourism: a bibliometric review between 2001 and 2018. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:23514–23528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08584-9
Surjanti J, Soejoto A, Seno DN, Waspodo (2020) Mangrove Forest ecotourism: participatory ecological learning and sustainability of students’ behavior through self-efficacy and self-concept. Social Sci Humanit Open 2(1):100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2019.100009
Swamy L, Drazen E, Johnson WR, Bukoski JJ (2018) The future of tropical forests under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. J Sustainable Forestry 37:2:221–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1416477
TIES 2015. The International Ecotourism Society (TIES). https://ecotourism.org/what-is-ecotourism/ Accessed 23 December 2020
TUIK 2020. Turkish Statistical Institution database. www.tuik.gov.tr Accessed 23 December 2020
Unal HE, Birben Ü, Elvan OD (2021) Public perception of forest crimes: The case of Ilgaz province in Turkey. Crime Law Soc Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09951-4
Wineman A, Alia DY, Anderson CL (2020) Definitions of “rural” and “urban” and understandings of economic transformation: Evidence from Tanzania. Journal of Rural Studies 79 (2020) 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.014
Yang J, Chen ML, Fu CY et al (2020) Environmental policy, tax, and the target of sustainable development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:12889–12898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05191-1
Yusof N, Abd Rahman F, Che Jamil MF, Iranmanesh M (2014) Measuring the quality of ecotourism services: case study–based model validation. SAGE Open 4(2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014538270
Zengin H, Değermenci AS, Bettinger P (2018) Analysis of temporal changes in land cover and landscape metrics of a managed forest in the west Black Sea region of northern Turkey: 1970–2010. J For Res 29:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0423-6
Zengin H, Değermenci AS, Bettinger P (2018) Analysis of temporal changes in land cover and landscape metrics of a managed forest in the west Black Sea region of northern Turkey: 1970–2010. J. For. Res. 29, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0423-6.

Download PDF

Reviews received at journal
22 Mar, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
21 Mar, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
10 Mar, 2022
First submitted to journal
06 Mar, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Ecotourism through the perception of forest villagers: Understanding via mediator effects using structural equation modeling

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Conceptual Framework

Material And Methods

Study area

Questionnaire design and analysis

Results

Discussion And Conclusion

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1