AA supplementation attenuates HFD-induced metabolic dysregulation in GLUT10G128E mice
To evaluate the effects of AA supplementation on metabolism in WT and GLUT10G128E mice on a CD or HFD, we began supplementing the drinking water with 3.3g/L AA for breeding pairs, nursing females, and mice after weaning. This protocol of AA supplementation was previously demonstrated to maintain optimal physiological AA levels in AA synthesis-deficient mice 23. Male mice were then placed on a CD or HFD (Fig. 1A). We first analyzed the effect of AA supplementation on serum AA levels in WT and GLUT10G128E mice at 3 and 20 weeks of age. We found that AA supplementation of pregnant and nursing mothers led to significantly increased serum AA levels in both WT and GLUT10G128E pups at 3 weeks of age (Fig. 1B), even though mice can synthesize AA de novo 24. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in serum AA levels among the different genotype or diet groups at 20 weeks of age, although AA supplementation was continued (Fig. 1C). Thus, AA supplementation in drinking water of breeding pairs and nursing females increased serum AA levels in the progeny, but AA supplementation of weaned mice did not further increase the serum AA levels in both WT and GLUT10G128E mice.
We then compared the changes in body weight and metabolism-related parameters in WT and GLUT10G128E mice fed with CD or HFD and with or without AA supplementation. GLUT10G128E mice gained more weight on a HFD than did WT mice, similar to the results of our previous study 9 (Fig. 1D and E). While AA effectively reduced the HFD-induced body weight gain in both HFD-fed WT mice (Fig. 1D and E), the supplementation more readily prevented HFD-induced body weight gain in GLUT10G128E mice than in WT mice (Fig. 1D and 1E). AA has no effect on body weight in either WT mice or GLUT10G128E mice on CD (Fig. 1D and E).
To analyze the differential effects of AA on reducing HFD-induced body weight gain in WT and GLUT10G128E mice, we assessed the metabolic consequences of AA supplementation. Of note, AA supplementation did not significantly affect food intake, physical activity (walking and resting times), or energy expenditure (VO2, VCO2, RER and heat production) in mice of either genotype on a HFD (Fig. S1). We then monitored the changes of fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels in the mice after HFD-feeding. The FBG levels were significantly higher in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice than in HFD-fed WT mice after 15 weeks of HFD-feeding (20 weeks of age) (Fig. 2A). We therefore analyzed the metabolic parameters at 20 weeks of age in WT and GLUT10G128E mice on a CD or a HFD and with or without AA supplementation. At this time-point, the HFD-fed WT mice exhibited a trend toward increased FBG when compared with CD-fed WT mice, but the trend did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 2B). We also did not observe significant increases in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; an indicator of the average blood sugar levels over the past three months) or insulin levels in HFD-fed WT mice compared with CD-fed controls (Fig. 2C and D). In contrast, FBG levels, HbA1c levels, and insulin levels were significantly increased in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice when compared with HFD-fed WT mice (Fig. 2B, C and D). These observations are consistent with our previous findings 9. Most importantly, AA supplementation attenuated HFD-induced increases in FBG, HbA1c and insulin levels (Fig. 2B, C and D). Moreover, HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice exhibited a more profound reduction in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity compared with HFD-fed WT mice 9. Here we showed that AA significantly improved the HFD-induced glucose intolerance and insulin resistance in GLUT10G128E mice, as measured by the glucose tolerance test (GTT) and insulin resistance test (ITT), respectively (Fig. 2E and F). Although AA had no significant effects on FBG, HbA1c or insulin levels in HFD-fed WT mice, the supplementation did significantly improve insulin resistance in HFD-fed WT mice (Fig. 2F). Nevertheless, the improvement in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice was more prominent than the improvement seen in HFD-fed WT (Fig. 2F). Taken together, these results again validate that GLUT10G128E mice are highly sensitive to HFD-induced metabolic dysregulation. Most importantly, AA supplementation attenuates the predisposition of HFD-induced metabolic dysregulation in GLUT10G128E mice.
AA supplementation rescues HFD-induced eWAT inflammation and adipokine dysregulation in GLUT10G128E mice
We then sought to elucidate how AA rescues HFD-induced metabolic dysregulation in GLUT10G128E mice. First, we determined the AA effects on overall body fat and lean compositions in WT and GLUT10G128E mice on the HFD. Feeding with a HFD increased the body fat composition in both WT and GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. 3A and B). AA had a trend toward reducing body fat composition in HFD-fed WT mice but did not reach significant significant (Fig. 3A and B). In contrast, AA supplementation significantly reduced the body fat composition in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. 3A and B). Additionally, HFD reduced the body lean composition in both WT and GLUT10G128E mice, but AA only significantly attenuated the reduction in body lean composition in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. 3C). We therefore analyzed AA effects on two major fat pads, epididymal WAT (eWAT) and subcutaneous inguinal WAT (sWAT) in CD- or HFD-fed WT and GLUT10G128E mice. AA had no effect on the weight of eWATs in CD-fed WT and GLUT10G128E mice. AA supplementation reduced the weight of eWATs in HFD-fed WT mice, but not in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. 3D). Notably, the weight of sWAT was highly increased in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice compared with HFD-fed WT mice, and AA supplementation has more pronounced effects in reducing the weight of sWAT in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice than in WT mice.
We have demonstrated that HFD feeding specifically induces inflammation and fibrosis in eWAT (a type of visceral fat) of GLUT10G128E mice, but HFD does not induce a similar response in sWAT of GLUT10G128E mice or the eWAT/sWAT of WT mice, even though the weight of sWAT was significantly increased in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice 9. As central obesity (over-accumulation of visceral fat) is associated with local and systemic inflammation and predisposes individuals to metabolic dysregulation 4;25, we then further analyzed the AA effects on eWAT in HFD-fed WT and GLUT10G128E mice. To evaluate the effects of AA supplementation on HFD-induced inflammation in eWAT, we first examined the crown-like structures (CLSs) that surround dead adipocytes and are indicative of inflammation in WAT 26. No CLSs were observed in eWAT of HFD-fed WT mice, whereas CLSs were frequently found in eWAT of HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. 4A). Moreover, AA supplementation reduced the apparent HFD-induced increases in CLSs within eWAT of GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. 4A). In contrast, no CLSs were observed in sWAT of either HFD-fed WT or HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. S2). Furthermore, AA supplementation had no affect the size or structure adipocytes in sWAT of HFD-fed WT mice or HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. S2). Thus, we conclude that GLUT10G128E mice tend to develop HFD-induced eWAT inflammation, and AA supplementation reduces HFD-induced eWAT inflammation.
The eWAT inflammation can change the expression of adipokines and predispose individuals to metabolic dysregulation 4;25. We therefore determined AA effects on systemic adipokine levels in HFD-fed WT and GLUT10G128E mice by analyzing the serum levels of adipokines that control systemic energy homeostasis, including adipokine, leptin, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α); these adipokines were previously shown to be highly dysregulated in eWAT of HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice 9. Notably, AA supplementation increased the serum levels of adiponectin, a protective adipokine in CD-fed GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. 4B). The levels of leptin, a cytokine correlated with body fat composition, were increased in HFD-fed WT and GLUT10G128E mice, and the HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice exhibit higher leptin levels than WT counterparts (Fig. 4C). AA supplementation significantly suppressed the elevated serum leptin levels, and this suppression was to a higher extent in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice compared with HFD-fed WT mice (Fig. 4C). Serum levels of two inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and TNF-α, were highly elevated in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice compared with HFD-fed WT mice (Fig. 4D and E). Most importantly, AA supplementation significantly suppressed HFD-induced serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. 4D and E).
Based on the observations that AA supplementation attenuated HFD-induced CLSs in eWAT and serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in GLUT10G128E mice, we conclude that AA supplementation counteracts the predisposition of GLUT10G128E mice to HFD-induced eWAT inflammation and adipokine dysregulation.
AA supplementation rescues HFD-induced ectopic lipid accumulation in GLUT10G128E mice
eWAT inflammation and adipokine dysregulation can contribute to increased serum levels of free fatty acids (FFA) and total cholesterol (TCHO), leading to lipid deposition in other organs, including liver and interscapular brown adipose tissue (iBAT) 27–29. Thus, we set out to determine the effects of AA on HFD-induced ectopic lipid accumulation in GLUT10G128E mice. We hypothesized that AA supplementation-mediated decreases in eWAT inflammation and adipokine dysregulation in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice may reduce serum levels of FFA and TCHO, and reduce ectopic lipid deposition in liver and iBAT. In our previous work, we demonstrated that HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice have increased serum levels of FFA and TCHO and increased lipid accumulation in liver and iBAT, as demonstrated by increased triglyceride content, tissue size and weight, as well as more frequent appearance of fat vacuoles in tissue sections 9. In this study, we observed similar patterns of increased serum levels of FFA and TCHO (Fig. 5A and B). We also observed increased tissue size, weight, and frequency of fat vacuole appearance in tissue sections of liver and iBAT in HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. 5C-H). We then examined the effects of AA supplementation on these parameters. Notably, AA supplementation reduced the HFD-induced serum levels of FFA and TCHO in GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. 5A and B). Furthermore, AA supplementation reduced the sizes and tissue weights of liver and iBAT and appearance of fat vacuoles in these tissues from HFD-fed GLUT10G128E mice (Fig. 4C-H). Thus, we conclude that AA supplementation rescues HFD-induced ectopic lipid accumulation in GLUT10G128E mice.
AA supplementation improves eWAT development in GLUT10G128E mice
We then determine how AA rescues HFD-induced eWAT inflammation and subsequent metabolic dysregulation in GLUT10G128E mice. As GLUT10G128E mice have compromised eWAT development, which plays a critical role in predisposing the mice to HFD-induced metabolic dysregulation due to the increased inflammation in eWAT and subsequent ectopic lipid accumulation in other tissues 9, we then tested whether AA supplementation could improve compromised eWAT development in GLUT10G128E mice. The eWAT deposits arise during late-embryonic and neonatal development 30, we therefore analyzed AA-mediated rescue of early eWAT development by determining the weight and histology of eWAT at 3 weeks of age. AA supplementation in nursing females did not affect body weights of either WT or GLUT10G128E pups at 3 weeks of age (Fig. 6A). However, AA supplementation rescued the reduced eWAT weight (Fig. 6B). AA supplementation also rescued the reduced average adipocyte size in GLUT10G128E eWAT, by reducing the percentage of small adipocytes (< 100 area 𝜇m2) and increasing the percentage of large adipocytes (> 250 area 𝜇m2), according to quantification of adipocyte size in GLUT10G128E eWAT sections (Fig. 6C-E). In contrast, AA supplementation did not affect the weight of eWAT nor did it affect the average size or size range of adipocytes in eWAT sections of WT mice (Fig. 6B-E). Thus, AA supplementation rescues weight and adipocyte size in eWAT of GLUT10G128E mice.
We next examined whether AA-mediated rescue of weight of eWAT in GLUT10G128E mice might also involve in increased adipogenesis, in addition to the increased adipocyte size. We have demonstrated that AA supplementation induces adipogenesis in both GLUT10-deficient and control preadipocytes. However, AA supplementation has more pronounced effects in GLUT10-deficient preadipocytes, including mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from GLUT10G128E mice as well as GLUT10-knockdown preadipocytes (3T3-L1 cells) 9. We determined the AA effects on adipogenesis in vivo by examining the expression of a preadipocyte marker, preadipocyte factor 1 (Pref-1), and a key adipogenic transcription factor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 1 (PPARγ 1), in eWATs of WT and GLUT10G128E mice at 3 weeks of age. Pref-1 is highly expressed in preadipocytes and absent after adipocyte differentiation 31. GLUT10G128E eWATs had higher levels of Pref-1 protein than did WT eWATs, AA supplementation reduced the Pref-1 protein levels in GLUT10G128E eWATs (Fig. 6F). These results suggest that more preadipocytes existed in GLUT10G128E eWATs than WT eWATs, and AA supplementation reduced the preadipocytes in GLUT10G128E eWATs. Furthermore, AA supplementation increased the expression levels of a key adipogenic transcription factor, PPARγ 1, in eWATs of GLUT10G128Emice and WT mice. These in vivo results were consistent with our previous findings from in vitro cell culture studies9. Taken together, these results suggest that AA supplementation promoted adipogenesis in eWATs of GLUT10G128E and WT mice and reduced undifferentiated preadipocytes in GLUT10G128E eWATs.