Protective effects of statins on COVID-19 risk, severity and fatal outcome – a nationwide Swedish cohort study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1432508/v1

Download PDF

Article

Protective effects of statins on COVID-19 risk, severity and fatal outcome – a nationwide Swedish cohort study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1432508/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: The impact of statins on COVID-19 remains unclear. This study aims to investigate whether statin exposure assessed both in the population and in well-defined cohorts of COVID-19 patients may affect the risk and severity of COVID-19 using nationwide Swedish population-based register data.

Methods: A population ≥40 years was selected by age/sex-stratified random sampling from the Swedish population on 1 Jan 2020. COVID-19 outcomes were identified from the SmiNet database, the National Patient Register and/or Cause-of-Death Register and linked with the National Prescribed Drug Register and sociodemographic registers. Statin exposure was defined as any statin prescriptions in the year before index date. In Cox regressions, confounding was addressed using propensity score ATT (Average Treatment effect in the Treated) weighting.

Results: Of 572,695 individuals in the overall cohort, 22.3% had prior regular statin treatment. After ATT weighting, protective effects were observed among statin user for hospitalization and COVID-19 death in the overall cohort and onset cohort. In the hospitalized cohort, statin use was only associated with lower risk for death (HR=0.86, 95%CI 0.79-0.95), but not ICU admission.

Conclusions: Statin-treated individuals appear to have lower COVID-19 mortality than nonusers, whether assessed in the general population, from COVID-19 onset or from hospitalization.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has affected nearly 432 million people worldwide and has led to over 5.9 million confirmed COVID-19-related deaths (1, 2). Various risk factors for severe forms of COVID-19 infection have been identified, including older age, male sex, hypertension, obesity and comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension (3, 4). The 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for managing dyslipidemia recommend the use of statins for patients with established cardiovascular disease to mitigate overall cardiovascular disease risk (5). The main mechanism by which statins reduce cardiovascular disease risk is to lower the blood cholesterol level, primarily low-density lipoprotein (LDL), but there are also several important pleiotropic mechanisms such as anti-inflammatory effects, reduction of reactive oxygen species and platelet activity, and lipid regulatory effects that may be important in patients with cardiovascular disease (6). Some of these may represent mechanisms for modulating the host response among COVID-19 patients. Statins could confer protective effects among COVID-19 patients by stabilizing and promoting regress of atherosclerotic plaques along with anti-inflammatory effects, inhibitor effects on leucocyte–endothelial interaction and inflammatory gene transcription (7). Additional potential statin mechanisms for a beneficial effect on COVID-19 include plasma membrane effects. Since statins inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis, they could influence the organization of plasma membrane lipid rafts on SARS-CoV-2 target cells in a way that decreases virus adsorption and/or egress of virus particles from infected cells, analogously to the effect statins have on HIV infection (8), thus reducing the severity of COVID-19 infection. A potential concern with statins and COVID-19 is that statins may increase the expression of ACE2 (9) – the membrane receptor that allows SARS-CoV-2 to gain entry into host cells, particularly in lung, heart, vasculature, brain, gastrointestinal tract and kidney - thus suggesting that statins could instead predispose to severe infection and adverse outcomes among COVID-19 patients (10). On the other hand, ACE2 has both lung- and cardio-protective roles indicating that an increase in its expression may actually ameliorate the COVID-19 outcome (11, 12).

To date, published studies show heterogeneous findings concerning statin use and COVID-19 disease. A meta-analysis based on a few early studies initially reported significant risk reduction for fatal or severe COVID-19 with statins (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53–0.94) (7). Subsequently, more studies have been conducted, and meta-analyses performed (7, 13–18). Although recent meta-analyses have estimated both no pooled effect of statins (7) and a protective effect (13), based on different selections of studies, two carefully conducted meta-analyses noted that pooling of results from studies with adjustment for confounders showed more protective results (pooled OR 0.51 and OR 0.73, respectively), whereas pooling crude estimates did not (15, 16). Overall, many of the studies on statins and COVID-19 were small and with limited or no adjustment for confounders. A majority were based on convenience samples of COVID-19 patients, often hospitalized cohorts, with unclear selection mechanisms – especially those in the earlier phases of the pandemic. The timing of statin exposure was often not clearly assessed. Non-severe outcomes have more rarely been studied concerning statins, but alleviation of COVID-19 symptoms has been reported (19). The effects of statins on outcomes in patients with COVID-19 thus remain to a large extent unclear (13, 14) and deficiencies in many retrospective studies such as differential handling of comorbidities and confounders and selection issues.

The current study uses a large linked Swedish population-based register database to investigate whether statin exposure both in the general population and in well-defined cohorts of COVID-19 patients may affect multiple outcomes, including the risk, severity and mortality in the COVID-19 study, taking into account comorbidities and confounding factors.

Study population and data sources

This study used data from the SCIFI-PEARL (Swedish Covid-19 Investigation for Future Insights – a Population Epidemiology Approach using Register Linkage) project, described in detail elsewhere (20). For the current study, a cohort study population including individuals aged 40 and above, free of COVID-19, was obtained by age-sex stratified random sampling of approximately 10% of the Swedish national population on 1 Jan 2020.

We defined 3 study cohorts, with different index dates: 1) Overall cohort of all study subjects, with index date 1 Jan 2020; 2) Onset cohort of subjects with COVID-19 onset, with index date defined as two days prior to the earliest of first positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results from SmiNet (the national database of notifiable diseases) or COVID-19 International Classification of Diseases, version 10, Swedish edition (ICD-10-SE) code (U07.1 or U07.2) in a healthcare encounter (hospitalization and specialized care visit encounters from the National Patient Register) in our data; 3) Hospitalized cohort of all subjects hospitalized for COVID-19, with index date at the admission date. We obtained information on pre-index drug use from the National Prescribed Drug Register, sociodemographic data from Statistics Sweden and comorbidities from the National Patient Register. All information was linked to study subjects using unique personal identifiers .

Exposure, outcome and follow-up

The main exposure was statin use (ATC code C10AA) in the year prior to index date with the unexposed group including those without any prescription for statin in this time period. In addition, in a sensitivity analysis we also identified statin user based on at least three filled prescriptions in the year before the index date. Prescriptions for chronic drug use are generally dispensed for 3-month periods (or 100 days, due to pack sizes) each time prescriptions are filled in Sweden. Individuals were grouped as those who regularly used (exposed) and those who did not regularly use statins (unexposed) according to this definition.

Follow-up for each cohort started on the day after index date and extended for each subject to the earliest of outcome, death, emigration or end of follow-up on 20 Jan 2021. The outcomes investigated were:

1. COVID-19 test-positivity: Individuals with positive PCR test result for SARS-CoV-2 in SmiNet. Event date was the test sampling date.

2. COVID-19 diagnosis: Individuals with healthcare encounter with COVID-19 ICD-10 code in the Patient Register or the Cause-of-Death register, or positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 in SmiNet. Event date was defined as the earliest of these.

3. COVID-19 hospitalization: Individuals admitted to hospital based on primary or secondary diagnosis with COVID-19 ICD-10 code in the Patient Register. Event date was the date of hospital admission.

4. COVID-19 ICU admission: Individuals who were transferred to or were directly admitted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with COVID-19 diagnosis based on the Swedish Intensive Care Register. Event date was the date of ICU admission.

5. COVID-19 mortality: Individuals identified from Cause-of-death register with COVID-19 ICD-10 code as the underlying or contributing cause of death. Event date was the date of death.

Statistical analysis and adjustment covariates

Descriptive statistics are presented as means with standard deviation for continuous variables and counts with percentage for categorical variables. We calculated standardized mean difference (SMD) to evaluate the balance between treated and untreated groups before and after propensity score weighting. The unadjusted number of events and event rates (per 1000 person-years) with 95% exact Poisson Confidence Intervals (CI) for COVID-19 endpoints were computed for statin users and non-users. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 endpoints was estimated as one minus the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the survival function and are presented with 95%CIs.

In the primary analyses, Cox regressions with statin exposure as the sole independent variable were used. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) unadjusted and adjusted using propensity scores for weighting to estimate the average treatment effect for the treated (ATT) using ATT weights, also known as standardized mortality ratio (SMR) weights (21). The propensity scores were estimated using gradient boosting (twang package in R) with shrinkage set to 0.01, interaction depth 3 (22). The number of trees was optimized to give optimal weighted balance between the treatment groups as determined by minimizing the average weighted SMD across the variables in the propensity score model. The ATT weight-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model used robust standard errors to account for the weights. The models estimated HR with 95%CI. P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant, with no adjustment for multiple comparisons. We used R software (version 4.0.2) for statistical analyses. We also stratified the analysis by sex and performed a sensitivity analysis using a different exposure definition, as described above.

Covariates in the propensity score included age, sex, education, marital status, employment, disposable income, country of birth, comorbidities (hypertension, cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), arrhythmia, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, respiratory disease, cancer, liver disease, obesity, neurological disease, dementia, autoimmune disease) and prior medications (Angiotension Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI), Angiotension Receptor Blocker (ARB), Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB), diuretics, betablockers, ezetimib, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylurea, insulin, glucosidase inhibitors, pioglitazone, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (gliptins), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, neuroleptics, respiratory treatments) (S1 Table and S2 Table) for variable definitions and data capture periods for comorbidities and drug exposures). There were very limited missing data for any of the variables (largely per definition as many comorbidities and drugs were defined as present (“yes”) when registered, otherwise “no” when absent), and where present, missingness was incorporated in the gradient boosting propensity score algorithm (22).

Ethical approval for this research was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (EPM), no. 2020 − 01800, 2020–05829, 2021 − 00267, 2021 − 00829, 2021–02106, 2021–04098. All study procedures involving human participants followed the ethical standards of the institutional research committee, as well as the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its amendments, or equivalent ethical standards. In Sweden, informed consent is generally not required for large-scale, registry-based studies. In this study, the Ethical Committee did not require the research team to collect informed consent from all individuals. Additionally, all linked information has been anonymized and de-identified by the National Board of Health and Welfare and Statistics Sweden, respectively, before reaching University of Gothenberg and the research team.

Among 572,695 individuals aged ≥ 40 years in the overall population cohort, 22.3% (n = 127542) were statin users (Table 1), and 15.2% (n = 79769) were regular statin users as defined for the sensitivity analysis. The mean age of statin users (75.9±11.7 years) was higher than nonusers (65.9±17). Statin users were more likely to have low education (35.4% vs 23.9%), be not gainfully employed/retired (71.8% vs 45.8%), and have low income, as well as more comorbidities and other medications (Table 1). Corresponding descriptive data for the COVID-19 onset and hospitalized cohorts are given in the S3 Table and S4 Table. The propensity scores among treated and untreated for the three cohorts had well overlapping distributions before weighting (S1 Figure) 1). After propensity score weighting, a good balance was achieved between the untreated and treated groups, with all SMDs below 0.082 in all study cohorts (Table 1, S3 Table and S4 Table).

Table 1

Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, comorbidities and prior medication of the *overall population cohort* on 1 Jan 2020 with standardized mean differences (SMDs) before and after ATT weighting, by statin use status (presented as n (%))
Characteristics		Statin users	Nonusers	SMD (before ATT weighting)	SMD (after ATT weighting)
N		127 542	445 153
Women		52798 (41.4%)	239592 (53.8%)	0.251	0.004
Age, years (mean±SD)		75.9±11.7	65.9±17.0	0.686	0.019
Age group (years)
	40–49	2932 (2.3%)	97067 (21.8%)	0.891	0.019
	50–59	9661 (7.6%)	90339 (20.3%)
	60–69	23067 (18.1%)	76931 (17.3%)
	70–79	36927 (29.0%)	63072 (14.2%)
	80–89	39018 (30.6%)	60973 (13.7%)
	90+	15937 (12.5%)	56771 (12.8%)
Education level
	Low (Primary school)	44516 (35.4%)	104620 (23.9%)	0.304	0.005
	Medium (Secondary school)	52586 (41.8%)	182935 (41.8%)
	High (Postgraduate)	28763 (22.9%)	150305 (34.3%)
Unemployed		91603 (71.8%)	203716 (45.8%)	0.549	0.001
Married		62205 (48.8%)	206803 (46.5%)	0.046	0.001
Disposable income, SEK (Mean±SD)		2516.7±7452.5	2951.8±6653.4	0.062	0.014
Country of birth
	Sweden	108261 (84.9%)	366656 (82.4%)	0.127	0.028
	Nordic	6151 (4.8%)	16110 (3.6%)
	EU	3267 (2.6%)	13630 (3.1%)
	Rest of the world	9863 (7.7%)	48757 (11.0%)
Comorbidities
	Hypertension	57012 (44.7%)	69967 (15.7%)	0.665	0.005
	Cardiovascular disease	50426 (39.5%)	59543 (13.4%)	0.621	0.011
	Ischemic heart disease	31418 (24.6%)	14762 (3.3%)	0.646	0.016
	Stroke or TIA	15439 (12.1%)	9865 (2.2%)	0.391	0.002
	Arrhythmia	24408 (19.1%)	37471 (8.4%)	0.315	0.007
	Heart failure	13763 (10.8%)	18063 (4.1%)	0.259	0.007
	Diabetes	26940 (21.1%)	16186 (3.6%)	0.551	0.006
	Chronic kidney disease	6423 (5.0%)	6920 (1.6%)	0.196	0.001
	Respiratory disease	6214 (4.9%)	9023 (2.0%)	0.156	0.001
	Cancer	21373 (16.8%)	45436 (10.2%)	0.193	0.002
	Liver disease	793 (0.6%)	2249 (0.5%)	0.016	0.005
	Obesity	3144 (2.5%)	5125 (1.2%)	0.099	0.002
	Neurological disease	2247 (1.8%)	6036 (1.4%)	0.033	< 0.001
	Dementia	3789 (3.0%)	11155 (2.5%)	0.028	0.003
	Autoimmune	8279 (6.5%)	17168 (3.9%)	0.119	0.005
Prior medications
	ACEI	40571 (31.8%)	44459 (10.0%)	0.557	0.005
	ARB	44838 (35.2%)	60288 (13.5%)	0.520	0.006
	CCB	46725 (36.6%)	61604 (13.8%)	0.544	0.008
	Diuretics	41760 (32.7%)	70366 (15.8%)	0.403	0.001
	Betablockers	67020 (52.5%)	77218 (17.3%)	0.794	0.018
	Ezetimib	5273 (4.1%)	1859 (0.4%)	0.251	0.014
	Other lipid lowering	731 (0.6%)	1565 (0.4%)	0.033	0.002
	Insulin	14668 (11.5%)	7961 (1.8%)	0.398	0.007
	Metformin	26895 (21.1%)	12655 (2.8%)	0.586	0.001
	Sulfonylureas	3216 (2.5%)	1574 (0.4%)	0.183	0.004
	Glucosidase inhibitors	64 (0.1%)	49 (0.0%)	0.022	0.012
	Pioglitazone	357 (0.3%)	142 (0.0%)	0.063	0.004
	DPP4 inhibitors	7589 (6.0%)	3437 (0.8%)	0.290	0.011
	GLP1 agonists	3550 (2.8%)	1247 (0.3%)	0.205	0.007
	SGLT2 inhibitors	4575 (3.6%)	1303 (0.3%)	0.241	0.010
	Neuroleptics	3046 (2.4%)	11654 (2.6%)	0.015	0.042
	Anti-depressants	23358 (18.3%)	66880 (15.0%)	0.088	0.001
	Anxiolytics	12842 (10.1%)	39130 (8.8%)	0.044	0.001
	Sedative	26276 (20.6%)	64162 (14.4%)	0.163	0.002
	P2Y12 inhibitors	14772 (11.6%)	4439 (1.0%)	0.447	0.004
	ASA cardiac	53188 (41.7%)	32322 (7.3%)	0.874	0.008
	NOACs	18304 (14.4%)	28914 (6.5%)	0.259	0.003
	Vitamin K antagonists	8912 (7.0%)	11718 (2.6%)	0.205	< 0.001
	Respiratory drugs	18212 (14.3%)	46065 (10.3%)	0.120	0.004

Table 2 shows the crude incidence rates among statin users and nonusers for various COVID-19 outcomes in the three studied cohorts. Whereas the incidence rates for test-positivity and diagnosis of COVID-19 were somewhat lower among statin users compared to non-users in the overall population cohort, incidence rates for hospitalization, ICU admission and death related to COVID-19 were clearly higher among statin users than non-users in both the overall population cohort and the onset cohort. For the hospitalized cohort, the COVID-19 mortality rate was similarly almost twice as high in statin users as in nonusers (609.1/1000 person-years vs. 385.3/1000 person-years), but we did not observe a similar trend for the incidence rate of ICU admission, which was almost identical in statin users and nonusers. In the sensitivity analysis with the exposed group restricted to regular statin users, we observed a similar trend for the three studied cohorts (S5 Table). Cumulative incidence Kaplan-Meier curves for each outcome in the three cohorts illustrate the same observed differences over time and subdivided by sex (S2-S4 Figures). Overall, the difference in cumulative probability for each outcome was greater among men than women.

Table 2

Events, person-years of observation, and crude incidence rates per 1000 person-years (with 95% exact Poisson Confidence Intervals (CI)) for various COVID-19 outcomes in the three studied cohorts (overall population cohort, COVID-19 onset cohort and hospitalized cohort), by statin use
Cohort	COVID-19 outcomes	Statin users			Non-users
Cohort	COVID-19 outcomes	Events	Person-years	Incidence rates [95%CI]	Events	Person-years	Incidence rates [95%CI]
		N = 127542			N = 445153
Overall cohort	Test-positive	5822	128885	45.2 [44.0-46.3]	25376	450753	56.3 [55.6–57.0]
	Diagnosis	6389	128667	49.7 [48.4–50.9]	26633	450297	59.1 [58.4–59.9]
	Hospitalization	2902	129684	22.4 [21.6–23.2]	6238	454928	13.7 [13.4–14.1]
	ICU admission	166	130037	1.30 [1.10–1.50]	264	455684	0.60 [0.50–0.70]
	Death	1042	130084	8.0 [7.50–8.50]	2722	455782	6.0 [5.70–6.20]
Onset cohort		N = 52 128			N = 242 785
	Hospitalization	15227	8521	1787.1 [1758.8-1815.7]	24857	46129	538.9 [532.2-545.6]
	ICU admission	1543	13627	113.2 [107.7–119.0]	2701	54901	49.2 [47.4–51.1]
	Death	4208	12596	334.1 [324.0-344.3]	6282	53522	117.4 [114.5-120.3]
Hospitalized cohort		N = 15 246			N = 24 846
	ICU admission	1522	5196	292.9 [278.4–308]	2673	8910	300 [288.7-311.6]
	Death	2884	4735	609.1 [587.1-631.8]	3386	8788	385.3 [372.4-398.5]

For the association analyses, unadjusted and fully ATT weight-adjusted HRs for statin use in the three studied cohorts for the 5 outcomes are shown in Table 3. With ATT weight adjustment to remove confounding, hazard ratios for the overall population cohort changed considerably, so that statin users had a significantly lower risk for test-positivity, diagnosis, hospitalization and death related to COVID-19 (p < 0.05), but not for ICU admission (Table 3). In the onset cohort, reduced risk were seen after ATT weight adjustment for all outcomes of hospitalization, ICU admission and death (Table 3). In the hospitalized population cohort on the other hand, after ATT weight adjustment, prior statin exposure was significantly associated with lower risk only for COVID-19 death (HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.79–0.95), but no clear evidence of association for prior statin exposure with COVID-19-related ICU admission was seen (Table 3). In the sensitivity analysis, we observed quite similar trends for the hazard ratios for COVID-19 infection, severity and death among regular statin user vs. non-user in all three studied cohorts, with a greater protective effect for the risk of COVID-19 death in the overall cohort population (HR = 0.74, 95%CI 0.66–0.83) (S6 Table).

Table 3

Hazard ratios (HRs), unadjusted and adjusted using ATT weighting, with 95% Confidence Interval (CI), comparing the risk of various COVID-19 outcomes between statin users and non-users, in the 3 studied cohorts (overall population cohort, COVID-19 onset cohort and hospitalized cohort).
Overall cohort		Unadjusted HR (95%CI)			ATT weight-adjusted HR (95%CI)
Overall cohort		Total	Men	Women	Total	Men	Women
Test-positive		0.80 [0.78–0.83]	0.89 [0.86–0.93]	0.72 [0.69–0.75]	0.90 [0.85–0.95]	0.92 [0.85–0.98]	0.87 [0.81–0.94]
Diagnosis		0.84 [0.82–0.86]	0.93 [0.90–0.96]	0.76 [0.73–0.79]	0.90 [0.85–0.94]	0.91 [0.85–0.97]	0.88 [0.82–0.95]
Hospitalization		1.68 [1.60–1.76]	1.69 [1.59–1.79]	1.56 [1.45–1.68]	0.86 [0.78–0.93]	0.85 [0.76–0.94]	0.87 [0.75–1.01]
ICU admission		2.2 [1.81–2.67]	1.96 [1.56–2.47]	2.13 [1.46–3.10]	0.99 [0.67–1.46]	0.99 [0.61–1.60]	0.99 [0.58–1.70]
Death		1.33 [1.23–1.42]	1.44 [1.31–1.57]	1.07 [0.95–1.21]	0.69 [0.62–0.77]	0.68 [0.59–0.77]	0.73 [0.62–0.85]
Onset cohort		Unadjusted HR (95%CI)			ATT weight-adjusted HR (95%CI)
Onset cohort		Total	Men	Women	Total	Men	Women
Hospitalization		3.21 [3.14–3.27]	2.82 [2.75–2.9]	3.46 [3.35–3.57]	0.93 [0.90–0.97]	0.90 [0.86–0.95]	0.98 [0.92–1.03]
ICU admission		2.68 [2.52–2.86]	2.22 [2.07–2.39]	2.85 [2.52–3.22]	0.87 [0.77–0.99]	0.90 [0.77–1.04]	0.78 [0.62-1.00]
Death		3.21 [3.09–3.34]	3.26 [3.09–3.43]	2.96 [2.78–3.14]	0.81 [0.76–0.87]	0.83 [0.75–0.91	0.78 [0.71–0.86]
Hospitalized cohort	Unadjusted HR (95%CI)				ATT weight-adjusted HR (95%CI)
Hospitalized cohort	Total		Men	Women	Total	Men	Women
ICU admission	0.92 [0.87–0.98]		0.87 [0.81–0.93]	0.90 [0.79–1.02]	0.98 [0.87–1.11]	1.03 [0.89–1.19]	0.86 [0.69–1.08]
Death	1.45 [1.38–1.52]		1.52 [1.43–1.62]	1.30 [1.20–1.41]	0.86 [0.79–0.95]	0.88 [0.78-1.00]	0.83 [0.73–0.94]

When we stratified the analyses by sex, after ATT weight adjustment, the hazard ratio for COVID-19 death in the overall population cohort was significantly reduced for both men (0.68, 95%CI 0.59-0.77) and women (0.73, 95%CI 0.62-0.85) with prior statin exposure (Table 3). Although across all comparison there was some suggestion of stronger associations in women, differences between the sexes were not strong or consistent. In the sensitivity analysis, very similar stratified results were seen (S6 Table).

This study investigated the impact of prior statin treatment on a range of five different COVID-19 outcomes in three different Swedish population-based cohorts - general population, individuals with COVID-19 onset and a COVID-19 hospitalization cohort. Our main findings show that prior statin treatment was significantly associated with a reduced risk of COVID-19 test-positivity, diagnosis, hospitalization and mortality in the 3 studied population cohorts. These findings strengthen and support evidence on the hypothesis of pleiotropic protective effects of statins in COVID-19 from prior cohort studies (23-30) and align with evidence summarized by recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews on the association of statin use and the potential protective effects against progression and severity of COVID-19 (15, 16, 18, 31, 32). A recent Swedish cohort study using register data with a smaller sample size limited to the Stockholm Region similarly showed statin use to be a protective factor for COVID-19 death (29). That study had shorter follow-up than ours, but similar to our main exposure definition, defined statin exposure broadly as any statin treatment initiated before the pandemic. not regular statin user).

As noted previously, plausible biological and clinical mechanisms, both direct and indirect, by which statins might protect against COVID-19 disease or severity have been proposed (7, 15, 16, 33-35). Statins have potential effects to reduce the cytokine release syndrome in COVID-19 by inhibiting Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and down-modulating macrophage activity (36-38). Statins have further been demonstrated to suppress the expression of both TLR2 and TLR4, leading to an immune response shift towards an anti-inflammatory response (39).

Beyond their cholesterol-lowering effect, statins could also affect the plasma membrane composition, where cholesterol is a dominating component. This effect is particularly important for enveloped viruses like SARS-CoV-2 that must pass the plasma membrane twice upon cell infection and again upon egress of newly synthesized virus particles. Recent studies have demonstrated that cholesterol is important in forming syncytia, multinucleated cells, that characterizes SARS-CoV-2 cell entry (40). Statins may well cause a reduction of syncytia by reducing plasma membrane cholesterol levels, thus reducing viral infection. Preliminary results indicate that statins indeed can reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection of lung epitheial cells (I. Parmryd, personal communication).

Statins also exert pleiotropic effects affecting inflammation and oxidative stress (36) of potential relevance for infection and lung protection. Statins may diminish the complications of COVID-19 by improving endothelial function, reducing serum PAI-1 levels and attenuating TGF-and VEGF in lung tissue (34). Furthermore, statins can constrain SARS-CoV-2 reproduction by restraining the main protease (Mpro) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)(34). Moreover, the effectiveness of statin treatment in significantly decreasing hospitalizations and deaths has been shown for influenza and Ebola virus diseases (41, 42).

Alongside their potential benefits in COVID-19, the side effects of statin treatment need to be considered, such as elevated creatinine kinase (CK) and elevated serum glucose levels, which have been reported in severe COVID-19 patients (43). Although statin treatment is commonly considered safe and well-tolerated, statins may induce liver injury (44). Current European guidance for the diagnoses and management of cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic recommends temporarily restraining statin treatment in patients with high liver enzymes (45). Future studies should preferably assess both positive and negative statin effects in COVID-19 patients.

Conflicting findings of the beneficial effects of prior statin treatment on COVID-19 have been reported in retrospective studies. Recent cohort studies have reported increased, decreased and unaffected risk for COVID-19 severity and mortality (46-50). Residual confounding may be an issue, and more carefully adjusted studies show more consistent protective results (15, 16). We have investigated individuals at three stages in the COVID-19 disease progression using 3 different cohorts: healthy before disease onset, from COVID-19 onset, and from COVID-19 hospitalization – with careful adjustment for confounding using propensity score analysis with ATT weighting. Protective effects of statins were seen for COVID-19 death for all three cohorts and in our overall population cohort and COVID-19 onset population also for the less severe outcomes (hospitalization), supporting a protective effect of statin on COVID-19 infection and severity. Despite some indications of an overall stronger protection in women than in men, we did not really observe consistent sex differences, which would have been consistent with the overall higher risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes seen in men during the pandemic (51).

Our study has several strengths and limitations that merit discussion. Using a population-based database in Sweden, we investigated the impact of statin use both in the population and in well-defined cohorts of COVID-19 patients for several different clinical COVID-19 outcomes. The completeness of data from nationwide administrative registries (including high-quality socio-economic data) and efficient linkages of different register data for COVID-19 patients to identify test-positive disease, clinical diagnoses and severe COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalization, ICU admission and death) are fundamental strengths of this study and support generalization of the results. In this study, we outlined statin exposure in the prior year into two different ways. Our main exposure definition was any statin exposure in the prior year, consistent with definitions commonly used in many studies. As a sensitivity analysis, we also used a more specific exposure definition, regular statin use, defined as ≥3 (generally 3-month) prescriptions in the prior year, to better capture individuals with likely ongoing regular statin use at index date, recognizing the variable adherence to actual daily statin intake in real-life data. Our sensitivity analysis with this definition gave very similar results, suggesting that the main exposure definition has adequate specificity for the hypothesized true exposure. We assume that short-term mechanisms of current use at the index would most likely be relevant for the observed effects we report. Our sensitivity analysis with this definition gave very similar results, suggesting that the main exposure definition has adequate specificity for the hypothesized true exposure. However, the study also has some limitations. Some exposure misclassification is possible, both of statin exposed and unexposed individuals, but this is unlikely to be related to the outcomes (which were totally unanticipated prior to index dates), and potential bias would thus tend to be towards the null. Unless the exposure misclassification is substantial, and the effect in the misclassified individuals is highly different, such bias would also have limited impact. Misclassification errors in identifying COVID-19 outcomes are also possible, especially under ascertainment of test-positive milder disease, but it is unlikely this differs between statin-treated and untreated. For the more severe outcomes, this issue is likely of less concern. Although propensity score weighting was used to minimize potential confounding, we cannot exclude some remaining bias from patient selection, treatment indication and residual confounding due to unmeasured confounders such as health risk behaviour (physical activity, smoking) and laboratory parameters (dyslipidemia). Nevertheless, the exposure cohorts were quite well balanced after propensity score weighting, and the results were consistent across the studied cohorts and follow-up periods from different index time points.

Findings from this study provide broad evidence of a beneficial effect of prior statin exposure on COVID-19 mortality in all the three cohort populations studied (overall population, COVID-19 onset and COVID-19 hospitalization cohorts), as well as less strong effects on other COVID-19 outcomes along the COVID-19 progression spectrum of outcomes that we studied. Together with prior available scientific evidence, both mechanistic and epidemiological, our findings support potential investigation into repurposing of statins for COVID-19 protection.

Author contributions statement

FN and SF planned and designed the study and aquired the data. SF, JN and AS conducted the statistical analyses. AS drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results, critically revised the paper and agreed on the final version for submission.

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Financial disclosure: FN reports prior employment at AstraZeneca until 2019, and ownership of some AstraZeneca shares. SF is currently employed at AstraZeneca. IP reports ownership of some AstraZeneca shares. AS, BW, and JN have nothing to disclose.

Funding: The current study was financed by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (Avtal om Läkarutbildning och Forskning/Medical Training and Research Agreement) grant ALFGBG-938453, ALFGBG-971130, FORMAS (Forskningsrådet för miljö, areella näringar och samhällsbyggande/Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning), a government research council for sustainable development, grant 2020-02828, and the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation grant 20210030, 20210581. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Data availability: The data in this study are pseudonymized individual-level data from Swedish healthcare registers and are not publicly available according to Swedish legislation. They can be obtained from the respective Swedish public data holders on the basis of ethics approval for the research in question, subject to relevant legislation, processes and data protection.

The Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center C. COVID-19 Data Johns Hopkins University and Medicine; 2021 [Available from: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.
World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard Geneva: WHO; 2021 [Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
Li J, Huang DQ, Zou B, Yang H, Hui WZ, Rui F, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes. J Med Virol. 2020.
Zheng Z, Peng F, Xu B, Zhao J, Liu H, Peng J, et al. Risk factors of critical & mortal COVID-19 cases: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2020;81(2):e16-e25.
Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111–88.
Oesterle A, Laufs U, Liao JK. Pleiotropic Effects of Statins on the Cardiovascular System. Circ Res. 2017;120(1):229–43.
Kow CS, Hasan SS. Meta-analysis of Effect of Statins in Patients with COVID-19. Am J Cardiol. 2020;134:153–5.
Carter G, Bernstone L, Sangani D, Bee J, Harder T, James W. HIV entry in macrophages is dependent on intact lipid rafts. Virology. 2009;30(386(1)):192–202.
Tikoo K, Patel G, Kumar S, Karpe PA, Sanghavi M, Malek V, et al. Tissue specific up regulation of ACE2 in rabbit model of atherosclerosis by atorvastatin: role of epigenetic histone modifications. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;93(3):343–51.
Lee KCH, Sewa DW, Phua GC. Potential role of statins in COVID-19. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;96:615–7.
Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, Huan Y, Guo F, Guan B, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005;436(7047):112–6.
Crackower MA, Sarao R, Oudit GY, Yagil C, Kozieradzki I, Scanga SE, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is an essential regulator of heart function. Nature. 2002;417(6891):822–8.
Subir R, Jagat JM, Kalyan KG. Pros and cons for use of statins in people with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):1225–9.
Minz MM, Bansal M, Kasliwal RR. Statins and SARS-CoV-2 disease: Current concepts and possible benefits. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(6):2063–7.
Pal R, Banerjee M, Yadav U, Bhattacharjee S. Statin use and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Postgrad Med J. 2021.
Onorato D, Pucci M, Carpene G, Henry BM, Sanchis-Gomar F, Lippi G. Protective Effects of Statins Administration in European and North American Patients Infected with COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2021;47(4):392–9.
Kollias A, Kyriakoulis KG, Kyriakoulis IG, Nitsotolis T, Poulakou G, Stergiou GS, et al. Statin use and mortality in COVID-19 patients: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2021;330:114–21.
Permana H, Huang I, Purwiga A, Kusumawardhani NY, Sihite TA, Martanto E, et al. In-hospital use of statins is associated with a reduced risk of mortality in coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19): systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacol Rep. 2021;73(3):769–80.
De Spiegeleer A, Bronselaer A, Teo JT, Byttebier G, De Tre G, Belmans L. The effects of ARBs, ACEis, and statins on clinical outcomes of COVID-19 infection among nursing home residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21:909 – 14 e2.
Nyberg F, Franzen S, Lindh M, Vanfleteren L, Hammar N, Wettermark B, et al. Swedish Covid-19 Investigation for Future Insights - A Population Epidemiology Approach Using Register Linkage (SCIFI-PEARL). Clin Epidemiol. 2021;13:649–59.
Desai R, Franklin J. Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners. BMJ. 2019;367(l5657).
Ridgeway G, McCaffrey D, Morral A, Cefalu M, Burgette L, Pane J, et al. Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups: A guide to the twang package 2021 [Available from: https://www.rand.org/statistics/twang/tutorials.html.
Chacko SR, DeJoy R, 3rd, Lo KB, Albano J, Peterson E, Bhargav R, et al. Association of Pre-Admission Statin Use With Reduced In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19. Am J Med Sci. 2021.
Lee HY, Ahn J, Park J, Kyung Kang C, Won SH, Wook Kim D, et al. Beneficial Effect of Statins in COVID-19-Related Outcomes-Brief Report: A National Population-Based Cohort Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021;41(3):e175-e82.
Lohia P, Kapur S, Benjaram S, Mir T. Association between antecedent statin use and severe disease outcomes in COVID-19: A retrospective study with propensity score matching. J Clin Lipidol. 2021;15(3):451–9.
Maric I, Oskotsky T, Kosti I, Le B, Wong RJ, Shaw GM, et al. Decreased Mortality Rate Among COVID-19 Patients Prescribed Statins: Data From Electronic Health Records in the US. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:639804.
Gupta A, Madhavan MV, Poterucha TJ, DeFilippis EM, Hennessey JA, Redfors B, et al. Association between antecedent statin use and decreased mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1325.
Daniels L, Sitapati A, Zhang J, Zou J, et.al. Relation of Statin Use Prior to Admission to Severity and Recovery among COVID-19 Inpatients. Am J Cardiol. 2020;136:149–55.
Bergqvist R, Ahlqvist VH, Lundberg M, Hergens MP, Sundstrom J, Bell M, et al. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and COVID-19 mortality in Stockholm, Sweden: A registry-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2021;18(10):e1003820.
Memel ZN, Lee JJ, Foulkes AS, Chung RT, Thaweethai T, Bloom PP. Association of Statins and 28-Day Mortality Rates in Patients Hospitalized With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection. J Infect Dis. 2022;225(1):19–29.
Chow R, Im J, Chiu N, Chiu L, Aggarwal R, Lee J, et al. The protective association between statins use and adverse outcomes among COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253576.
Vahedian-Azimi A, Mohammadi SM, Heidari Beni F, Banach M, Guest PC, Jamialahmadi T, et al. Improved COVID-19 ICU admission and mortality outcomes following treatment with statins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Med Sci. 2021;17(3):579–95.
Barkas F, Milionis H, Anastasiou G, Liberopoulos E. Statins and PCSK9 inhibitors: What is their role in coronavirus disease 2019? Med Hypotheses. 2021;146:110452.
Pawlos A, Niedzielski M, Gorzelak-Pabis P, Broncel M, Wozniak E. COVID-19: Direct and Indirect Mechanisms of Statins. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(8).
Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1033–4.
Zeiser R. Immune modulatory effects of statins. Immunology. 2018;154:69–75.
Parihar S, Guler R, Brombacher F. Statins: a viable candidate for host-directed therapy against infectious diseases. Nat Rev Immunol 2019;19:104–17.
Yuan X, Deng Y, Guo X, Shang J, Zhu D, Liu H. Atorvastatin attenuates myocardial remodeling induced by chronic intermittent hypoxia in rats: partly involvement of TLR-4/MYD88 pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;446(1):292–7.
Koushki K, Shahbaz SK, Mashayekhi K, Sadeghi M, Zayeri ZD, Taba MY, et al. Anti-inflammatory Action of Statins in Cardiovascular Disease: the Role of Inflammasome and Toll-Like Receptor Pathways. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2021;60(2):175–99.
Sanders DW, Jumper CC, Ackerman PJ, Bracha D, Donlic A, Kim H, et al. SARS-CoV-2 requires cholesterol for viral entry and pathological syncytia formation. Elife. 2021;10.
Fedson DS, Rordam OM. Treating Ebola patients: a 'bottom up' approach using generic statins and angiotensin receptor blockers. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;36:80–4.
Fedson DS. Treating influenza with statins and other immunomodulatory agents. Antiviral Res. 2013;99(3):417–35.
Mach F, Ray KK, Wiklund O, Corsini A, Catapano AL, Bruckert E, et al. Adverse effects of statin therapy: perception vs. the evidence - focus on glucose homeostasis, cognitive, renal and hepatic function, haemorrhagic stroke and cataract. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(27):2526–39.
Bjornsson ES. Hepatotoxicity of statins and other lipid-lowering agents. Liver Int. 2017;37(2):173–8.
ESC guidance for the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: part 2-care pathways, treatment, and follow-up. Eur Heart J. 2021.
Mitacchione G, Schiavone M, Curnis A, Arca M, Antinori S, Gasperetti A, et al. Impact of prior statin use on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: data from tertiary referral hospitals during COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. J Clin Lipidol. 2021;15(1):68–78.
Cariou B, Goronflot T, Rimbert A, Boullu S, Le May C, Moulin P, et al. Routine use of statins and increased COVID-19 related mortality in inpatients with type 2 diabetes: Results from the CORONADO study. Diabetes Metab. 2021;47(2):101202.
Oh TK, Song IA, Jeon YT. Statin Therapy and the Risk of COVID-19: A Cohort Study of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea. J Pers Med. 2021;11(2).
Grasselli G, Greco M, Zanella A, Albano G, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Mortality among Patients With COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units in Lombardy IJI. Risk Factors Associated With Mortality among Patients With COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(10):1345–55.
Butt JH, Gerds TA, Schou M, Kragholm K, Phelps M, Havers-Borgersen E, et al. Association between statin use and outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a nationwide cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e044421.
Peckham H, de Gruijter N, Raine C, Radziszewska A, al. e. Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission. Nat Commun. 2020;11(6317).

Competing interest reported. Financial disclosure: FN reports prior employment at AstraZeneca until 2019, and ownership of some AstraZeneca shares. SF is currently employed at AstraZeneca. IP reports ownership of some AstraZeneca shares. AS, BW, and JN have nothing to disclose.

SupplementarymaterialforProtectiveeffectsofstatinsonCOVID19riskseverityandfataloutcomeanationwideSwedishcohortstudy.docx

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
30 May, 2022
Reviews received at journal
03 May, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
30 Apr, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
30 Apr, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
11 Apr, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
11 Apr, 2022
Editor invited by journal
28 Mar, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
28 Mar, 2022
First submitted to journal
08 Mar, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Protective effects of statins on COVID-19 risk, severity and fatal outcome – a nationwide Swedish cohort study

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Study population and data sources

Exposure, outcome and follow-up

Statistical analysis and adjustment covariates

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1