CRELD2 is a novel modulator of calcium mobilisation and calcineurin- NFAT signalling during osteoclast differentiation

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1435321/v1

Download PDF

Article

CRELD2 is a novel modulator of calcium mobilisation and calcineurin- NFAT signalling during osteoclast differentiation

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1435321/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Cysteine rich with epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains 2 (CRELD2) is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) resident chaperone protein with calcium binding properties. CRELD2 is an ER-stress regulated gene that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of skeletal dysplasias and has been shown to play an important role in the differentiation of chondrocytes and osteoblasts. Despite CRELD2 having an established role in skeletal development and bone formation, its role in osteoclasts is currently unknown. Here we show for the first time that CRELD2 plays a novel role in trafficking transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1), which is linked to an upregulation in the expression of Nfat2, the master regulator of osteoclast differentiation in early osteoclastogenesis. Despite this finding, we show that CRELD2 is dispensable for osteoclastogenesis. Indeed, the overexpression of Creld2 impaired osteoclast differentiation due to a reduction in the activity of the calcium-dependant phosphatase calcineurin. This in turn led to a subsequent block in the dephosphorylation of nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATc1) dephosphorylation preventing its nuclear localisation and activation as a pro-osteoclastogenic transcription factor. Our exciting results show that the overexpression of Creld2 in osteoclasts impaired calcium mobilisation which is essential for activating calcineurin and promoting osteoclastogenesis. Therefore, our data proposes a novel inhibitory role for this calcium-binding ER-resident chaperone in modulating calcium flux during osteoclast differentiation which has important implications in our understanding of bone remodelling and the pathogenesis of skeletal diseases.

Throughout life, bone is continually remodelled to maintain skeletal size, shape and integrity. Bone remodelling involves the highly coordinated interplay between bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts that function in a homeostatic environment, with osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption preceding osteoblastogenesis and bone formation¹. It therefore comes as no surprise that dysregulation of this finely tuned process is associated with a range of pathological diseases including osteoporosis and osteopetrosis².

Bone resorption is a multistep process beginning with the differentiation, polarisation and adhesion of multi-nucleated haematopoietic stem cell-derived osteoclasts to the bone surface. This process is tightly regulated by osteoblast-osteoclast crosstalk that occurs via several mechanisms³ including cell-cell/cell-bone contact and cytokines. Such osteoclastogenic cytokines include canonical (e.g. receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL))⁴ and non-canonical (e.g. transforming growth factor-Beta (TGF-β))⁵ cytokines that function to upregulate the expression of transcription factors including nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATc1), considered to be the master regulator of osteoclast differentiation.

Inactive NFATc1 exists within the cytoplasm in a phosphorylated form. Upon RANKL stimulation it undergoes dephosphorylation (activation) by the calcium-dependant phosphatase, calcineurin, and subsequent nuclear translocation where it regulates genes associated with osteoclast differentiation and activity⁴. This process relies on a sustained cytoplasmic oscillation of calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which has been linked to ER-stress and the evolutionarily conserved signalling cascade termed the unfolded protein response (UPR)⁶ that functions to maintain ER homeostasis. In response to calcium depletion and ER stress, sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium-ATPase (SERCA2b) pumps on the ER membrane are upregulated⁷ allowing an influx of calcium into the ER, regulating calcium flux and restoring ER homeostasis. Furthermore, ER stress has also been linked with an upregulation of ER-resident calcium binding chaperones including calreticulin⁸ and calnexin^9,10, which have been shown to regulate ER calcium levels.

The cysteine rich with epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains (CRELD) family of proteins consists of two structurally related ER-resident proteins; CRELD1 and CRELD2¹¹. The CRELD family are multi-domain proteins comprised of varying numbers of calcium-binding EGF-like domains, and a highly conserved region of tryptophan and glutamic acid residues (WE) domain¹². During embryonic development CRELD1 expression is mostly localised to soft tissues and plays an important role during heart development with mutations in CRELD1 shown to result in atrioventricular septal defects¹³. CRELD2 is an ER-stress inducible gene¹⁴ expressed in the developing skeleton and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of skeletal dysplasias such as multiple epiphyseal dysplasia¹⁵ and metaphyseal chondrodysplasia type Schmid¹⁶, which are characterised by prolonged ER stress due to the retention and accumulation of mutant protein within the ER. To date the functions of CRELD2 have mainly been linked to protein folding and trafficking. For example, CRELD2 was first identified to be important in the folding and trafficking of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ɑ4 and β2 subunits¹⁷. In addition, an important role for CRELD2 has been identified as a protein disulphide isomerase (PDI)¹⁸ that functions in bone formation and homeostasis where it promotes the trafficking of the LRP1 receptor, subsequently modulating WNT signalling during chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation¹⁹. Despite these recent studies linking CRELD2 to skeletal development and homeostasis, the role of CRELD2 still remains largely unknown and its role during osteoclastogenesis has never been studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to understand the role of this novel chaperone protein in osteoclast differentiation.

CRELD2 is dispensable for osteoclast differentiation.

To study the role of CRELD2 in osteoclastogenesis, we first examined the expression of Creld2 in RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells after osteoclastogenic stimulation. Interestingly, qPCR analysis revealed that the expression of Acp5, encoding the osteoclast marker enzyme tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAcP), was significantly upregulated 1 day and 4 days after RANKL stimulation indicating successful osteoclastogenesis; however, in contrast Creld2 was significantly downregulated upon treatment with RANKL (Fig. 1A). Despite playing important roles in osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation, these data indicate that CRELD2 is not required for osteoclast differentiation. Therefore, to study the role of CRELD2 in osteoclastogenesis, we knocked down Creld2 expression in pre-osteoclasts using siRNA and successful knockdown was confirmed by qPCR and western blotting (Supplementary Fig. 1A&B). Numerous studies have shown that osteoclastogenic differentiation is impaired if RAW264.7 cells become too confluent²⁰ and here, we show that CRELD2 ablation significantly increased the proliferation rate of pre-osteoclasts (Supplementary Fig. 1C). Although we hypothesised that Creld2 knockdown would promote osteoclastogenesis, due to the increased proliferation of these ‘knockdown cells’ we concluded that Creld2 knockdown in RAW264.7 cells was not the appropriate model to study its role in osteoclastogenesis. Instead, we overexpressed CRELD2 (CRELD2 OE) in the pre-osteoclasts (Supplementary Fig. 1D&E) and osteoclastogenesis was induced through RANKL supplementation for 4 days. Using a variety of techniques, we show that CRELD2 overexpression disrupts osteoclastogenesis. Staining for TRAcP, a histochemical marker of osteoclasts, revealed that CRELD2 OE osteoclasts were significantly smaller (Fig. 1B). In addition, CRELD2 OE osteoclasts contained significantly less nuclei/cell. As previous studies have shown that there is a positive correlation between nuclei number and osteoclast resorption efficiency²¹, we studied the resorptive activity of control and CRELD2 OE osteoclasts using a bone resorption assay in which osteoclasts were cultured on a synthetic crystalline calcium phosphate surface that mimics the bone surface. Our results confirm that CRELD2 OE osteoclasts showed a markedly reduced resorption activity compared to control osteoclasts as highlighted by a significant reduction in resorption area (Fig. 1C).

To further assess the effects of CRELD2 overexpression on early osteoclast differentiation, we analysed the global gene expression profile of control and CRELD2 OE osteoclasts 48 hours after RANKL stimulation by RNA-sequencing. CRELD2 overexpression resulted in the differential expression of 3576 genes (Fig. 2A). Gene Ontology (GO) term analysis highlighted clusters comprised of genes associated with ubiquitous cellular function as well as genes involved in osteoclastogenesis. The most notable clusters included genes associated with cell proliferation and apoptosis, the TGF-β signalling pathway and osteoclast fusion (Fig. 2B). The expression of several key osteoclastogenic genes were then validated by qPCR. For example, Ctsk encoding Cathepsin K a protease secreted by mature osteoclasts with an essential role in bone resorption²², was found to be significantly downregulated upon CRELD2 overexpression (Fig. 2C). In addition, genes encoding RANK the receptor for RANKL (Tnfrsf11a) and a transmembrane osteoclast fusion protein (Dcstamp)²³ were also found to be significantly downregulated (Fig. 2C). Overall, these data suggest that CRELD2 overexpression impairs the process of osteoclastogenesis and disrupts osteoclast functionality.

CRELD2 modulates Nfat2 expression during the early stages of osteoclastogenesis through promoting TGF-β1 secretion.

Despite our results showing that CRELD2 overexpression inhibits osteoclastogenesis, we were surprised to see that the expression of the main transcription factor associated with osteoclastogenesis, Nfat2 encoding NFATc1, was significantly upregulated in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts 24 hours after RANKL stimulation (Fig. 3A). Although the expression of Nfat2 was comparable 48 hours after RANKL stimulation, our RNA sequencing results showed that genes regulated by NFATc1 were in fact significantly downregulated in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts. Since these findings did not correlate with the increased expression of Nfat2 in CRELD2 overexpressing osteoclasts during early differentiation, we sought to understand the mechanism resulting in increased Nfat2 expression in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts 24 hours after RANKL stimulation and why this did not promote osteoclastogenesis.

In a recent study, we identified TGF-β1 as a CRELD2 binding partner¹⁹ in osteoblasts and chondrocytes. Here, we confirm using co-immunoprecipitation that CRELD2 also binds to TGF-β1 in pre-osteoclasts (Fig. 3B). Indeed, we show via western blotting that CRELD2 overexpression promoted the secretion of TGF-β1 (Fig. 3C), which correlated with an increase in active extracellular TGF-β as determined using a luciferase reporter assay to measure bioactive TGF-β (Fig. 3D). This resulted in increased canonical TGF-β signalling in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts as identified by the upregulation of SMAD2 phosphorylation (Fig. 3E). Since a recent study has shown that TGF-β1 directly induces NFATc1 expression within 24 hours of osteoclastogenic differentiation²⁴, our results indicate that CRELD2 traffics TGF-β1 in pre-osteoclasts, which in turn regulates Nfat2 expression in the early stages of osteoclast differentiation.

CRELD2 disrupts essential calcium mobilisation required for calcineurin/NFAT signalling during osteoclast differentiation.

The finding that CRELD2 overexpression resulted in an upregulation of Nfat2 expression at Day 1 during osteoclastogenesis is contradictory to the impaired osteoclast differentiation and activity we observed (Fig. 1&2). To further investigate the mechanism by which CRELD2 overexpression impairs osteoclastogenesis, we examined the expression of NFATc1 by western blotting. Although the expression of Nfat2 was upregulated in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts 24 hours after RANKL stimulation, we show that the protein levels of NFATc1 were in fact significantly downregulated (Fig. 4A). This resulted in an increased ratio of pNFATc1/NFATc1 in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts. Studies have shown that the phosphorylation status of NFATc1 is central to its activity; indeed, the dephosphorylation of NFATc1 by calcineurin A results in its translocation to the nucleus where it is active as a transcription factor. As we identified an increase in the levels of phosphorylated NFATc1 in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts, we then performed subcellular fractionation to isolate the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments of control and CRELD2 OE osteoclasts. The subsequent western blot analysis of NFATc1 expression in these respective compartments showed that CRELD2 overexpression resulted in a reduced nuclear localisation of NFATc1 in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts (Fig. 4B).

To further elucidate the mechanism by which CRELD2 overexpression impairs the nuclear translocation of NFATc1, we examined the expression and activity of calcineurin, a calcium-dependant phosphatase that dephosphorylates NFAT transcription factors. We found that the expression of the catalytic subunit of calcineurin (calcineurin A) was comparable at the gene and protein level between control and CRELD2 OE osteoclasts (Fig. 5A&B); however, the activity of calcineurin was significantly reduced following CRELD2 overexpression (Fig. 5C). Studies have shown that the activity of calcineurin is calcium-dependant and relies upon calcium mobilisation from the ER²⁵. Here we show that calcium mobilisation is impaired in CRELD2 osteoclasts, which could explain the reduction in calcineurin activity in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts (Fig. 5D). Therefore, our findings suggest that CRELD2 functions to modulate calcium flux, subsequently regulating calcineurin activity and NFATc1 trafficking thereby having a detrimental impact on osteoclastogenesis.

A recent study has shown that CRELD2 plays an important role in skeletal development and bone homeostasis by promoting the differentiation of chondrocytes and osteoblasts¹⁹. Despite the well-established role of CRELD2 in bone-forming osteoblasts, its role in osteoclast differentiation is unknown. Since CRELD2 is expressed in the skeleton and plays a role in bone homeostasis, understanding its role in osteoclasts would provide further understanding of the complex process of bone remodelling, which would have an impact on our understanding of associated diseases.

Here, we show that CRELD2 is dispensable for osteoclastogenesis and its expression is decreased upon stimulation of osteoclast differentiation. Indeed, we show that overexpressing CRELD2 in a pre-osteoclast cell line impairs osteoclast differentiation and activity as determined by a significant reduction in osteoclast size, number of nuclei and resorptive activity. This was confirmed by transcriptomic analyses that showed a downregulation in the expression of multiple osteoclastogenic marker genes in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts.

Although overexpressing CRELD2 in pre-osteoclasts inhibited osteoclast differentiation, we were surprised to find that the expression of Nfat2, encoding NFATc1 the master regulator of osteoclastogenesis, was significantly upregulated in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts 24 hours after RANKL stimulation. To understand how CRELD2 overexpression resulted in increased Nfat2 expression, we referred to results from a previous study that identified putative CRELD2 binding partners in two independent cell types by co-immunoprecipitation. Of note, CRELD2 was found to bind to TGF-β1. Previous studies have shown that TGF-β1 plays a complex and controversial role in osteoclastogenesis depending on the model system. For example, in co-culture with osteoblasts TGF-β downregulates RANKL expression and inhibits osteoclastogenesis, whereas it has been shown to directly stimulate commitment and osteoclastogenic differentiation of RAW264.7 cells by upregulating RANK expression^5,26,27. In addition, a study has shown that TGF-β directly upregulates Nfat2 expression within 24 hours of RANKL stimulation²⁴. Here, TGF-β was shown to commit monocytes to the osteoclast lineage in early differentiation; however, it performs an inhibitory role in the latter stages of osteoclastogenesis²⁴.

Since we confirmed CRELD2 bound to TGF-β1 in RAW264.7 pre-osteoclasts and previous cellular functions of CRELD2 demonstrated a role in protein folding and trafficking, we hypothesised that CRELD2 promotes the secretion of TGF-β1 from RAW264.7 cells. Indeed, we show here for the first time that CRELD2 overexpression promoted the extracellular trafficking of TGF-β1 resulting in increased TGF-β signalling in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts. We therefore hypothesised that the upregulation of Nfat2 expression in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts 24 hours after RANKL stimulation was attributed to increased TGF-β secretion. Despite the initial increase in Nfat2 expression, by 48 hours post-RANKL treatment the levels of Nfat2 were comparable between control and CRELD2 OE osteoclasts, further indicating that TGF-β1 functions to prime pre-osteoclasts during the early stages of differentiation.

Inactive NFATc1 exists in the cytoplasm in a phosphorylated form. To be active as a transcription factor it undergoes dephosphorylation by the calcium-dependant phosphatase calcineurin and is translocated to the nucleus where it regulates the expression of genes that drive osteoclastogenesis. To understand how osteoclastogenesis was impaired following CRELD2 overexpression, despite the upregulation of Nfat2 in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts in early differentiation, we analysed NFATc1 activation and nuclear translocation. It is important to note that although the expression of Nfat2 was upregulated in CRELD2 OE osteoclasts 24 hours after RANKL stimulation, this was not reflected at the protein level. In fact, total NFATc1 levels were reduced following CRELD2 overexpression, which resulted in an increase in the ratio of phosphorylated NFATc1 to total NFATc1, indicating that the transcriptional activity of NFATc1 in CRELD2 OE was decreased. This can be attributed to a reduction in the activity of calcineurin following CRELD2 overexpression, which in turn resulted in a reduction in nuclear localisation of NFATc1.

We therefore sought to understand how overexpression of this ER-stress inducible and ER-resident calcium-binding protein affected the activity of cytoplasmic calcineurin. Studies have shown that other calcium-binding ER-resident proteins regulate calcium mobilisation, which is required for the activation of calcineurin. Indeed, the ER-stress regulated calcium binding chaperones, calreticulin and calnexin, have been shown to modulate and reduce cytoplasmic calcium flux^8–10. Indeed, calreticulin expression has been linked to reduced osteoclast differentiation¹⁰ due to impaired calcium flux. We therefore sought to investigate the effects of CRELD2 expression on calcium mobilisation during osteoclastogenesis. Similar to findings from other studies, our data showed that the overexpression of the calcium-binding ER-resident chaperone protein CRELD2 resulted in a reduction in the overall level of calcium released from the ER. Recent work has shown that CRELD2 interacts with the ER-resident calcium binding protein reticulocalbin (RCAN) 1, which mediates calcium-dependent cellular activities and inhibits calcium release from the ER through binding to the calcium channel inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptor type1 (IP3R1). Based on these recent findings, we hypothesise that CRELD2 mediates calcium flux via interactions with RCAN1; however, the relationship between these two calcium-binding ER proteins requires further study.

In summary, our results propose a novel inhibitory role of CRELD2 during osteoclastogenesis. We show for the first time that although CRELD2 promotes the trafficking of TGF-β1, osteoclastogenesis is disrupted by CRELD2 expression. We also demonstrated that CRELD2 expression blocks calcium release from the ER, impairing osteoclast differentiation due to reduced calcium-dependant calcineurin activity and the subsequent nuclear translocation of NFATc1, the master regulator of osteoclastogenesis.

Although no mutations have been identified in CRELD2 to date, these data highlight a novel role for CRELD2 in osteoclastogenesis and indicates CRELD2 may be a potential genetic locus for skeletal diseases caused by dysregulated osteoclast differentiation and function.

Cell Culture and transfection. RAW264.7 murine pre-osteoclast cells (ATCC, TIB-71) were maintained in complete α-MEM media supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 U/mL penicillin and 1 µg/mL streptomycin. To knockdown Creld2 expression (siCRELD2), siRNA gene silencing was used as outlined previously¹⁹. To overexpress CRELD2 (CRELD2 OE) a previously generated¹⁹ V5-tagged wild-type Creld2 cDNA construct in pcDNA3.1(+) was transfected into cells using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Empty pcDNA3.1(+) was expressed in Control cells.

Analysis of cell proliferation. To analyse cell proliferation, cells were cultured in Amersham Cell Proliferation Labelling Reagent Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) for 2 hours. Cells were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature and immunofluorescence was performed as outlined previously¹⁹ using an anti-BrdU antibody (ab6326, Abcam) to detect BrdU-positive cells. BrdU-positive cells were counted using the watershed algorithm in the FIJI program and expressed as a percentage of the total number of cells.

Osteoclastogenesis. For osteoclastogenesis, control and Creld2 knockdown/overexpression RAW264.7 cells were seeded at a density of 1.5 x 10⁴ cells/cm² in osteoclastogenic media (complete α-MEM containing 50 ng/mL recombinant mouse RANKL (R&D Systems, 462-TEC-010/CF)). Osteoclastogenesis was performed by culturing RAW264.7 cells in osteoclastogenic media for 4 days, refreshing media after 2 days.

RNA Extraction and Sequencing. RNA was extracted from cell pellets using the Promega ReliaPrep™ RNA Cell Miniprep System and the resulting RNA was sent to the Genomics Core Facility at Newcastle University for RNA sequencing. The samples were prepared using the Illumina Truseq stranded mRNA kit and analysed on an Illumina Nextseq 500 platform. The Galaxy open-source web-based platform for biomedical research²⁸ was used to analyse the RNA sequencing results. This analysis included alignment of paired-end sequencing reads to the mouse (mm10) reference genome using the HISAT2. All adapter sequences were removed using the Cutadapt tool and SamTools-Merge was used to merge the output BAM files from the genome alignment for each sample. The number of reads which map to genes within the reference genome was determined using featurecounts. To identify the differentially expressed genes between the samples Limma-Voom was used, with gene annotations added using annotateMyIDs. The resulting output file showed both significant and non-significant differentially expressed genes, this gene list was filtered to show all biologically relevant fold changes (≤ 0.8 + ≥ 1.2) with a p-value ≤ 0.05. RNA-sequencing hits were confirmed by quantitative-PCR (qPCR). The dataset generated in this current study is deposited on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository, accession number GSE199189.

Quantitative-PCR (qPCR). cDNA was synthesised using the Go Script Reverse Transcription System according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA template was removed after incubation with 1 U RNase H for 20 minutes at 37°C. qPCR was then performed using the POWER SYBR Green as stated in the manufacturer’s instructions using a Thermo Fisher QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System. All primer sequences can be found in Supplemental Table 1. Samples were analysed in triplicate and expression was normalised to the level of Actb.

Protein extraction and immunoblotting. Protein lysates were extracted and protein concentrations were determined as previously described¹⁹. Samples were denatured by boiling and reduced using Dithioreitol (DTT) where appropriate. For analysis of subcellular localisations, nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were extracted using a Nuclear Extraction Kit (Abcam, Ab113474) as outlined in the manufacturer’s protocol. Western blotting was then performed as outlined previously¹⁹. The following primary antibodies were used: phosphoSMAD2 (#138D4), SMAD2 (#D7G7), Histone H4 (#2592) and NFATc1 (#D15F1) from Cell Signalling. Calcineurin A (ab52761) and TGF-β1 (ab215715) from Abcam. CRELD2 (HPA000603) from Cambridge Biosciences. GAPDH (mab374) from Sigma Aldrich, phosphoNFATc1 (Orb312385) from Biotbyt.

Membranes were imaged on the LI-COR Odyssey CLx Imaging System. Densitometric analysis of fluorescent protein bands were presented relative to GAPDH levels. Analysis was performed on 3 samples per genotype.

Co-immunoprecipitation. RAW264.7 cells were transfected with a previously generated¹⁹ V5-tagged wild-type CRELD2 cDNA construct in pcDNA3.1 (+) to overexpress CRELD2 and an empty pcDNA3.1 (+) plasmid as a control. Co-immunoprecipitation was performed as outlined previously¹⁹. CRELD2 interacting proteins were then identified by western blotting.

Analysis of osteoclast differentiation and activity in vitro. Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAcP) staining was performed to analyse osteoclast number and area using the Acid phosphatase Leukocyte kit (Sigma Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The average osteoclast area and average nuclei number per osteoclast was determined using ImageJ. To measure the bone resorbing activity, a Corning® Osteo Assay was used following the manufactures’ protocol. ImageJ was used to measure the percentage resorption area per well.

Intracellular calcium mobilisation assay. Control and CRELD2 OE RAW264.7 cells were loaded with the Rhod-4-AM fluorescent calcium probe and calcium mobilisation was measured after the addition of 5 µM ionomycin as previously described²⁹.

Calcineurin activity assay. To determine the activity of calcineurin in control and CRELD2 OE RAW264.7 cells, a Cellular Calcineurin Phosphatase Activity Assay Kit (Abcam) was used as outlined in the manufacture’s protocol.

TGF-β activity assay. TGF-β activity was measured using the TGF-β luciferase reporter bioassay, a kind gift from Professor D. Rifkin (NYU), as outlined previously³⁰. Luciferase activity was detected via the Luciferase Assay System (Promega) according to manufacturer's instructions.

Statistics. All results are expressed as mean ± the standard deviation (SD) with three samples per experiment. A Student’s unpaired t-test was used to analyse statistical significance, with a significant value denoted by p ≤ 0.05.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Genomics Core Facility at Newcastle University for their help with performing the RNA Sequencing. We would also like to thank Professor Daniel Rifkin (Department of Medicine, NYU) for kindly gifting the TGF-β1 reporter cells. This work was funded by The Barbour foundation.

Author contributions

AD and EPD designed and conducted the experiments and wrote the manuscript. MDB provided expertise, resources and contributed to the manuscript. JM contributed to the manuscript. EPD, JM and MDB supervised the project.

Data availability

All OMICs data generated from this paper will be shared with the scientific community by depositing on the publicly available database, GEOsets.

Additional information

All authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Rodan, G. A. Bone homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 13361–13362, doi:10.1073/pnas.95.23.13361 (1998).
Feng, X. & McDonald, J. M. Disorders of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Pathol 6, 121–145, doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130203 (2011).
Chen, X. et al. Osteoblast-osteoclast interactions. Connect Tissue Res 59, 99–107, doi:10.1080/03008207.2017.1290085 (2018).
Takayanagi, H. et al. Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) integrate RANKL signaling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. Dev Cell 3, 889–901, doi:10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00369-6 (2002).
Quinn, J. M. et al. Transforming growth factor beta affects osteoclast differentiation via direct and indirect actions. J Bone Miner Res 16, 1787–1794, doi:10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.10.1787 (2001).
Tohmonda, T. et al. IRE1α/XBP1-mediated branch of the unfolded protein response regulates osteoclastogenesis. J Clin Invest 125, 3269–3279, doi:10.1172/jci76765 (2015).
Højmann Larsen, A., Frandsen, A. & Treiman, M. Upregulation of the SERCA-type Ca2 + pump activity in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress in PC12 cells. BMC Biochem 2, 4, doi:10.1186/1471-2091-2-4 (2001).
Alvandi, Z., Al-Mansoori, L. J. R. & Opas, M. Calreticulin regulates Src kinase in osteogenic differentiation from embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res 48, 101972, doi:10.1016/j.scr.2020.101972 (2020).
Bollo, M. et al. Calcineurin Interacts with PERK and Dephosphorylates Calnexin to Relieve ER Stress in Mammals and Frogs. PLOS ONE 5, e11925, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011925 (2010).
Fischer, C. R. et al. Calreticulin inhibits inflammation-induced osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. J Orthop Res 35, 2658–2666, doi:10.1002/jor.23587 (2017).
Rupp, P. A. et al. Identification, genomic organization and mRNA expression of CRELD1, the founding member of a unique family of matricellular proteins. Gene 293, 47–57, doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(02)00696-0 (2002).
Maslen, C. L. et al. CRELD2: gene mapping, alternate splicing, and comparative genomic identification of the promoter region. Gene 382, 111–120, doi:10.1016/j.gene.2006.06.016 (2006).
Robinson, S. W. et al. Missense mutations in CRELD1 are associated with cardiac atrioventricular septal defects. Am J Hum Genet 72, 1047–1052, doi:10.1086/374319 (2003).
Oh-hashi, K. et al. CRELD2 is a novel endoplasmic reticulum stress-inducible gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 387, 504–510, doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.047 (2009).
Nundlall, S. et al. An unfolded protein response is the initial cellular response to the expression of mutant matrilin-3 in a mouse model of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. Cell Stress Chaperones 15, 835–849, doi:10.1007/s12192-010-0193-y (2010).
Cameron, T. L. et al. Transcriptional profiling of chondrodysplasia growth plate cartilage reveals adaptive ER-stress networks that allow survival but disrupt hypertrophy. PLoS One 6, e24600, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024600 (2011).
Ortiz, J. A. et al. The cysteine-rich with EGF-like domains 2 (CRELD2) protein interacts with the large cytoplasmic domain of human neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha4 and beta2 subunits. J Neurochem 95, 1585–1596, doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03473.x (2005).
Hartley, C. L. et al. Armet/Manf and Creld2 are components of a specialized ER stress response provoked by inappropriate formation of disulphide bonds: implications for genetic skeletal diseases. Hum Mol Genet 22, 5262–5275, doi:10.1093/hmg/ddt383 (2013).
Dennis, E. P. et al. CRELD2 Is a Novel LRP1 Chaperone That Regulates Noncanonical WNT Signaling in Skeletal Development. J Bone Miner Res 35, 1452–1469, doi:10.1002/jbmr.4010 (2020).
Nguyen, J. & Nohe, A. Factors that Affect the Osteoclastogenesis of RAW264.7 Cells. J Biochem Anal Stud 2, doi:10.16966/2576-5833.109 (2017).
Piper, K., Boyde, A. & Jones, S. J. The relationship between the number of nuclei of an osteoclast and its resorptive capability in vitro. Anat Embryol (Berl) 186, 291–299, doi:10.1007/bf00185977 (1992).
Troen, B. R. The role of cathepsin K in normal bone resorption. Drug News Perspect 17, 19–28, doi:10.1358/dnp.2004.17.1.829022 (2004).
Yagi, M. et al. DC-STAMP is essential for cell-cell fusion in osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells. J Exp Med 202, 345–351, doi:10.1084/jem.20050645 (2005).
Fox, S. W., Evans, K. E. & Lovibond, A. C. Transforming growth factor-beta enables NFATc1 expression during osteoclastogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 366, 123–128, doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.11.120 (2008).
Bonilla, M., Nastase, K. K. & Cunningham, K. W. Essential role of calcineurin in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Embo j 21, 2343–2353, doi:10.1093/emboj/21.10.2343 (2002).
Yan, T., Riggs, B. L., Boyle, W. J. & Khosla, S. Regulation of osteoclastogenesis and RANK expression by TGF-beta1. J Cell Biochem 83, 320–325, doi:10.1002/jcb.1200 (2001).
Fuller, K., Lean, J. M., Bayley, K. E., Wani, M. R. & Chambers, T. J. A role for TGFbeta(1) in osteoclast differentiation and survival. J Cell Sci 113 (Pt 13), 2445–2453, doi:10.1242/jcs.113.13.2445 (2000).
Batut, B. et al. Community-Driven Data Analysis Training for Biology. Cell Syst 6, 752–758.e751, doi:10.1016/j.cels.2018.05.012 (2018).
Falconer, A. M. D. et al. Collagenolytic matrix metalloproteinases antagonize proteinase-activated receptor-2 activation, providing insights into extracellular matrix turnover. J Biol Chem 294, 10266–10277, doi:10.1074/jbc.RA119.006974 (2019).
Abe, M. et al. An assay for transforming growth factor-beta using cells transfected with a plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promoter-luciferase construct. Anal Biochem 216, 276–284, doi:10.1006/abio.1994.1042 (1994).

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
11 Apr, 2022
Reviews received at journal
03 Apr, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
24 Mar, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
24 Mar, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
24 Mar, 2022
Editor invited by journal
23 Mar, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
23 Mar, 2022
First submitted to journal
09 Mar, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

CRELD2 is a novel modulator of calcium mobilisation and calcineurin- NFAT signalling during osteoclast differentiation

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Results

Discussion

Methods

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1