Deep Eutectic Solvents: green solvents for the removal of degraded gelatin on cellulose nitrate cinematographic films

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1439357/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Deep Eutectic Solvents: green solvents for the removal of degraded gelatin on cellulose nitrate cinematographic films

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1439357/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Historical photographic negatives and cinematographic films with cellulose nitrate (CN) supports show deterioration mechanisms related to the thermal, photocatalytic and hydrolytic loss of nitro groups from the CN chain. To prevent their disappearance, their scanning and digitalization becomes a priority.

However, degradation hinders the scanning of CN films. Since motion picture films are stocked as a reel, the backside of each frame touches the front of another one. During degradation, the decrease in pH contributes to lowering the viscosity of gelatin. In this way, the emulsion gets softer and some residues may deposit on the back of the superimposed frames, and the gelatin may also spread over the film surface and come out from the edges.

Traditional approaches to clean gelatin residues from the surface of CN bases and from the sides of film rolls include mechanical removal with scalpels and the use of polar solvents. However, these methods are either slow, ineffective or could potentially damage the degraded CN support and the remaining gelatin emulsion at the other side of the film.

Accordingly, we have evaluated the performance of three choline chloride and betaine-based Deep Eutectic Solvent (DES) formulations. These DES are unexpensive, easy to prepare, green (non volatile, safe towards operator and the environment), non flammable and have been previously proposed for the extraction of proteinaceous material, but their use for the restoration of photographic negatives or cinematographic films has not been reported yet.

Selected areas over the frames of a real deteriorated CN cinematographic film were cleaned from gelatin accretions by rubbing a cotton swab soaked in DES. Isopropyl alcohol (IPOH) was then employed to remove the remaining DES residues.

To evaluate the cleaning performance, each area was characterized and documented before and after treatment using Optical Microscopy (OM), Micro-Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (µATR-FTIR), and cross-section observation.

All treatments using DES proved effective for the removal of gelatin residues and harmless towards the CN film supports at the selected application times, showing superior cleaning power compared to traditional methods. Thus, the proposed cleaning methods with DES are suitable for cinematographic and photographic film restoration.

Green deep eutectic solvents

Photographic film

Gelatin emulsion

Green restoration

Cleaning

The layout of early film materials (Fig.1) include a thick, transparent and flexible Cellulose Nitrate (CN) base (c) coated with the film emulsion (a). The emulsion is the layer employed to record the image and, in already developed films, it consists of a colloidal suspension of dark silver particles and color dyes (if the film was colored) fixed in a matrix of photographic-grade gelatin(1). Sometimes, a thin intermediate adhesive or “subbing” layer (b) was applied to guarantee the adhesion between the emulsion and the polymeric base.

CN is an inorganic cellulose derivate where hydroxyl groups in the glucopyranose ring have been substituted by nitrate groups O-NO₂.

Since 1889(2, 3), flexible polymeric films made of CN with a degree of substitution (DS) of around 2 were used as support for the first examples of cinematographic film.

Thanks to its low cost, CN was initially widely employed for producing film bases, but due to its high flammability, its use of was progressively reduced and then definitely abandoned in 1951(2, 3).

Cellulose nitrate photographic and cinematographic materials are known to be intrinsically unstable, mainly due to the degradation mechanisms triggered by thermal (Fig. 2), photocatalytic and hydrolytic loss of nitro substitutive groups of the CN base(4). This process occurs quickly under uncontrolled storage conditions, particularly unventilated environments showing high temperature and humidity.

The resulting degradation product, the NO₂ gases, react with environmental water producing nitric and nitrous acids, which catalyze further loss of nitro groups in the CN polymer and the reduction of the molecular weight of the backbone.

Eventually, the base deforms, becomes frail and brittle, and crumbles to dust(5). To avoid the complete loss of the recorded images, their scanning and digitalization is a priority for cinematheques, libraries and other institutions safeguarding such audiovisual archives(6).

However, nitrate supports which have already underwent some degree of hydrolytic degradation of their bases can suffer from softening of their gelatin emulsions since the pH decreases to values lower than the isoelectric point of type B gelatin, where the gelatin molecule becomes positively charged, and the repulsion forces between positive charges slightly uncoil the gelatin molecule and facilitate its solubilization(7). Nguyen et al. have suggested also that NO₂ species promote the hydrolysis of hardened (cross-linked) and unhardened photographic gelatins, lowering their molecular weight and their viscosity(8).

Photographic gelatin is most of the time alkaline or type-B gelatin, produced from the alkaline treatment of demineralized cattle bone, ossein(9). Ossein is mostly made up of type I collagen, an heterotrimer collagen formed by three polypeptide α-chains associated in a triple helix configuration(10). By treating parent collagen with an hydrated lime slurry, type B gelatin is produced, destroying the crosslinking between collagen(9–12).

Gelatin softening is a serious drawback, because upon becoming more fluid it can easily migrate laterally when it is pressured and adhere to any surface in contact with it. This often affects the back side of the subsequent coils of the same film (Fig. 3), causing the loss of images in the first coil and gelatin accumulation on the back of the second. The adhesion of convolutions, known as blocking, ultimately transforms the film into a solid unit which cannot be unrolled, reaching the so-called “hockey puck” state(5).

Therefore, to allow the digitalization of the film and to avoid subsequent blocking when the reel is stored, it becomes mandatory to remove gelatin accretions.

Traditional cleaning approaches to eliminate gelatin residues from the side of film rolls include mechanical removal with surgical scalpels, and the use of polar solvents, such as distilled water, Ethanol (EtOH) and Isopropyl Alcohol (IPOH). However, the use of alcohols results in a slow, ineffective cleaning, whereas water may be potentially dangerous if it accidentally leaks towards the front of the frame when cleaning a section of the base. Furthermore, the use of organic solvents presents different drawbacks, since they are flammable, and the excessive emissions of volatile solvents can harm the environment and can pose health risks to the operator upon extended unprotected exposure.

To overcome these drawbacks, we have proposed, tested and evaluated the performance of three Deep Eutectic Solvent (DES) formulations, providing green, unexpensive, easy-to-prepare and effective alternative for the cleaning of gelatin accretions from CN photographic bases.

DES have been previously employed for the dissolution of proteinaceous(13, 14) and other organic materials, but to the best of the authors’ knowledge have not been employed for the restoration of photographic negatives or cinematographic films. A different DES formulation has been previously applied in gel form to remove proteinaceous coatings in paintings(15).

Deep Eutectic Solvents, first defined by Abbot et al. in 2003(16), are mixtures of a Hydrogen Bond Acceptor (HBA), commonly a quaternary ammonium salt, with an Hydrogen Bond Donor (HBD), like an amide, amine, alcohol or carboxylic acid. Electrostatic charge delocalization (through hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions) between these two constituents lower the fusion point or glass transition temperature below that of the original components when both are present near a certain molar ratio(17, 18).

The precursors, such as Choline Chloride (ChCl), Betaine (B) and Urea (U), are biodegradable, environmentally friendly (being obtained from renewable sources), relatively cheap and non-toxic.

Choline chloride is regarded as a B-complex vitamin and is extracted from biomass; betaine is the trimethyl derivative of glycine and is obtained as a metabolic oxidation product of choline in different organisms (19). Betaine can be commercially retrieved by separation during sugar production from beets. Urea is the most commercialized nitrogenous fertilizer and is employed by mammals for processing nitrogen-containing compounds(20, 21).

Ethylene glycol (EG) instead, is a non-toxic compound commonly exploited as antifreeze, wetting and plasticizer agent in industrial processes(22).

By mixing choline chloride with ethylene glycol at a 1:2 molar proportion, a DES commonly called ethaline is obtained. This product has been widely studied due to its low viscosity and therefore high solubilizing power. Through computer modelling, it has been found that the HBD and HBA in this DES formulation form a supramolecular cage-like arrangement where the Cl⁻ anion becomes the central element interacting with five hydroxyl groups, one from the choline cation and four from both EG molecules(23). Ethaline has been reported as capable of extracting collagen peptides from cod skins without destroying the peptide bonds in the process and also of being able to solubilize singular alanine, glutamic acid, lysine, glycine and hydroxyproline amino acids without creating new chemical bonds with them, so the solubilization process is probably based on intermolecular hydrogen bond formation between Cl⁻ and the amino and carboxyl groups(13).

When urea is used as HBD, it has been observed that relatively basic DES are obtained, owing to the presence of the amino group, and to the fact that a small fraction of ammonia is released through urea decomposition during DES preparation, rising the pH of the mixture(24).

The DES formed by mixing betaine and urea in a 1:2 ratio worked well for the extraction of bovine serum albumin protein, showing a low glass transition temperature. After FTIR studies, it was suggested that in this DES formulation not only hydrogen bonds but also Coulomb interactions are formed between HBD and HBA, so its intrinsic interactions and structure differ from those of choline chloride-based DES(25).

2.1 Aim of study

The objective of this research is to test three green DES formulations; i.e., choline chloride: ethylene glycol, betaine: ethylene glycol, and betaine: urea; as cleaning agents for cinematographic film cleaning, comparing their performance with that of traditional methods based on IPOH and EtOH, employed as conventional solvents, and evaluating their impact on the cellulose nitrate support.

2.2 Materials

Reagents and solvents were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich and used without any further purification: Betaine ≥ 98%, choline chloride ≥ 98%, urea ACS reagent 99.0-100.5%, ethylene glycol anhydrous 99.5%, and distilled water were used as DES precursors (Fig. 4); 2-propanol (isopropyl alcohol) ACS reagent ≥ 99.8%, ethyl alcohol 96.0-97.2% were instead used as solvent.

An Amersham Protran® medical grade CN filter membrane with 0.45µm pore size, was used as CN analytical reference

2.3 Cinematographic film sample

Some coils of a CN 35 mm B&W positive print of the film My Little Baby (La Principessa), kindly donated by the Fondazione Cineteca di Bologna, were used for all testing. The emulsion showed an orange tinting treatment, and deterioration effects including emulsion softening and accretions. These softened gelatin residues accumulate on the back of the film base (Fig. 5).

2.4 DES preparation

The DES mixtures were prepared by mixing the HBA with a HBD at a 1:2 molar ratio. For those DES based on betaine, a small amount of distilled water (10 wt% for B:EG and 30% wt% for B:U) was added to keep their viscosity low enough at room temperature (see Table 1).

Table 1

Constitution of tested DES
DES abbreviation	HBA	HBD	Added distilled water content (%wt)
ChCl:EG	Choline Chloride (ChCl)	Ethylene Glycol (EG)	0%
B:EG	Betaine (B)	Ethylene Glycol (EG)	10%
B:U	Betaine (B)	Urea (U)	30%

Mixing was performed in a Petri dish by stirring vigorously at 70–75°C until the components turned into a transparent fluid, then letting the glass dish stand still until the liquid cooled down.

2.5 Solubility tests

From the same degraded cinematographic film sample, eight rectangular pieces of similar size (approximately 6 mg each) were cut. After the removal of the gelatin emulsion with water the samples were dried for 2 days at room temperature.

The samples were weighted, their thickness measured with a Mutitoyo® MDC-25SX digimatic micrometer and their superficial appearance documented with Optical Microscopy (OM).

The samples were subsequently subjected to solubility tests using the same solvents employed for the cleaning, to assess their impact on degraded CN. This was done by immersing the CN samples into 100 µl of each solvent and sonicating them in sealed vials for 10 mins at room temperature. Two of the CN samples were immersed in ChCl:EG, two in B:EG, and two in B:U, whereas one was immersed in IPOH and another one in EtOH. Afterwards, samples were oven-dried for two days. The samples immersed in the DES formulation were rinsed for 1 minute by immersion into 3 ml of IPOH and gently agitated before being put in contact with absorbing paper for removing eventual solvent residues, before allowing to dry for two days.

After drying, sample weights and thickness were measured again and the film surface condition documented with OM to check the changes or damages created during the procedure.

Weighting of samples used in the solubility tests was performed with a Discovery DV215CD Ohau Corporation® analytical balance. Sample weight was measured 3 to 4 times, each thickness 2 times, and averaged values were employed for comparison.

To properly evaluate the effect on the CN base, each DES formulation was directly applied on areas without gelatin residues, according with the same procedures employed for the removal of gelatin residues described in the following paragraph, by using a small cotton swab (ctsw). The effects of the solvents on the CN base was evaluated analyzing before and after the treatments the surface and the cross sections of the base with OM and Micro-Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (µATR-FTIR).

2.6 Cleaning procedure

A small ctsw soaked with the DES solvents was gently rolled over an area (ca. 0.7x0.7 cm) of the CN base surface, previously documented under OM and µATR-FTIR, using minimal mechanical strength for 1 minute. Afterwards, non-volatile DES residues were removed from the surface by rolling 2 cotton swabs soaked with IPOH for 1.5 minutes. Total application time including intervals between ctsw change was 3 minutes; the final appearance of the cotton swabs was documented.

In total, 3 zones with comparable gelatin accretions were cleaned with each one of the 3 DES, for a total of 9 areas cleaned.

2.7 Evaluation of the cleaning performance

The performance of the cleaning procedure was evaluated using OM under different lightning conditions and µATR-FTIR on the film surface before and after the treatment.

In particular, the presence of gelatin and DES residues, as well as morphological damages inflicted by the treatment on the CN base, was evaluated by recording Bright Field (BF) and Dark Field (DF) surface microphotographs. µATR-FTIR allowed to check the presence of characteristic DES and gelatin (amide II) bands. The extension and the thickness of collagen residues left over the CN base was evaluated by OM observation of cross sections prepared before and after the treatment.

2.7.1 Surface and Cross section observation with Optical Microscopy using visible and UV lights

Surface and cross section photomicrographs have been recorded with an Olympus DP70 cooled digital color camera directly connected to an Olympus BX51M Optical microscope with different magnification objectives (1.25-5x for surface and 5-50x for cross section photomicrographs) under visible and UV lights, respectively provided by a 100W halogen projection lamp and an Ushio Electric USH102D lamp. Surface photos were taken with visible light under DF (to enable real color observation) and BF (to enhance surface topography changes, transparent residue detection, and side differentiation), whereas cross section photos were taken in visible light (to record real color appearance) and UV fluorescence (to enhance material and layer differentiation). Surface photomicrographs from each cleaned area and each solubility test sample were stitched together using ImageJ Grid-stitching plugin based on the method published by Preibisch et al. 2009, using linear blending and maximum intensity blending modes(26) to obtain a single image covering the whole area of interest.

2.7.2 Cross section preparation

Cross sections of the treated film areas were prepared by embedding microsamples in KBr(27, 28). To avoid the cracking of the pellet due to the thickness of the sample, we gently pressed manually the first half of the pellet (300mg KBr), and after positioning the sample and adding the remaining 300 mg of KBr, the pellet was pressed at 2 tons for 1 minute.

2.7.3 FTIR spectroscopy

All FTIR spectra were acquired using a Thermo Scientific® Nicolet iN 10MX spectrometer fitted with a mercury–cadmium–telluride (MCT) type A detector cooled by liquid nitrogen and a X–Y–Z motorized stage with 1 µm incremental steps, except transmission spectra of pure reagents for DES production, which were acquired in transmission mode using a MidIR Agilent® Cary 630 using the same parameters. Spectra were recorded in the 4000 to 675 cm^− 1range, using a spectral resolution of 4 cm^− 1, applying 64 scans per measurement and 64 scans for the background, acquired before each measurement.

Characterization of surface materials and treatment evaluation were carried out using µATR-FTIR with a Ge ATR crystal and an optical aperture of 40x40 µm. RAS spectra of the DES mixtures were acquired on a thin DES layer over a gold-coated glass holder with an aperture of 80x80 µm.

FTIR spectra were automatically baseline corrected using OMNIC™ Software (Thermo Electron Corporaton™) after blanking out the 2300–2400 cm^− 1 region, related to νCO₂ signals.

µATR-FTIR measurements before cleaning were performed in 3 different spots, whereas µATR-FTIR analysis after cleaning was performed in 7 to 14 spots for each cleaning area to ensure the representativeness of the data. For the CN samples used in the solubility tests, three µATR-FTIR measurements were recorded per sample using 150x150 optical aperture on the dry samples at the same spots before and after the test.

3.1 Characterization of the film sample:

By a visual examination of the film it can be noted that the support appears slightly warped and fragile; the degraded emulsion from the front side has softened and it has adhered also to the back side of the film base.

A fragment of the film sample has been embedded to evaluate the thickness of the gelatin residues. As reported in Fig. 6, the CN base is about 124 µm-thick and is covered by a continuous layer of degraded gelatin with maximum thickness of 13 µm).

µATR-FTIR measurements performed on the base (Fig. SM.1) present four strong absorption bands directly linked to the nitro group vibrations ascribable to cellulose nitrate (1640 cm^− 1, 1276 cm^− 1, 832 cm^− 1 and 750 cm^− 1)(29).

The band at 1728 cm^− 1 not present in the CN standard, is most likely related to the presence of camphor, commonly used as plasticizer for CN(29, 30), or to the presence of carbonyl intermediates (e.g. gluconolactones, gluconic and glucuronic acid) produced during scission of the CN chain at later degradation stages(4).

The broad band at 3426 cm^− 1 can be assigned to O-H stretching; the bathochromic shift of the band in comparison to the CN standard is a sign of the increase in hydrogen bonding between hydroxyl groups, following hydrolytic loss of nitrate groups as a consequence of degradation(31).

The µATR-FTIR spectra registered on the orange-tinted emulsion residues over the CN base (Fig. SM.2) are quite similar to that of a gelatin glue standard. A shoulder at around 1727 cm^− 1 can be attributed to the C = O bond stretching, associated to camphor sublimating from the degrading film base or to plasticizers used in film emulsions themselves, such as oils (32, 30). The peaks at 1340 and 825 cm^− 1 can be attributed to the presence of nitrates, which can be a residue of unreacted silver nitrate(33) or could derive from nitric and nitrous acids formed with the degradation of the CN base.

The strong characteristic band of Amide II of gelatin at ca. 1539 cm^− 1 does not overlap with other CN or DES bands, so they were used to detect remaining glue residues after the cleaning treatments.

3.2 Characterization of the DES solvents

The DES solvents were characterized by recording RAS-FTIR spectra. Table 2 reports the DES diagnostic bands which do not overlap with CN and gelatin signals, so they have been used to verify the presence of DES residues after the cleaning. The assignments of the bands(22, 23, 34–40) are also reported.

Table 2

Attribution of diagnostic FTIR bands useful for detection of each DES
Wavenumber (cm^− 1)			Assignment
ChCl:EG	B:EG	B:U
---	1495	1491	ν_asH–C–H (CH₃) in betaine(34)
1479	1475	1472	δ_sC-H(23), δ_s CH₂, δ_sCH₃, δ_sCOH(35) and ρCH₃(36) in choline chloride; ν_sCOO^-(34) and δ_aCH₃ in betaine(37); νCN in urea(38)
955	953 weak	955 weak	ν_aNC_4, νC-C(35) and ν_aCCO(36,38)in choline chloride; δC–C–N(34) and v(CC)(39) in betaine
---	933	933	δ C–N–C(34) and ρ(CH₂) (37,39) in betaine
883 medium	893	895 weak	ρC-H(22) and ρCH₂(40) in EG; νC–C(34) and ν_s(CCN)(37,39) in betaine
* ν stretching, ν_s symmetrical stretching, ν_a asymmetrical stretching, δ bending, δ_s scissoring (for CH₂) and symmetrical deformation (for CH₃), δ_a asymmetrical deformation (for CH₃), ρ rocking.

3.3 Solubility tests results

The effects of DES formulations on the degraded CN base were evaluated by comparing the thicknesses, weights and superficial appearance of the samples before and after the solubility tests. The same tests were performed also with Ethanol (EtOH) and isopropyl alcohol (IPOH) which are commonly employed for movie restoration.

EtOH completely solubilized the CN sample while IPOH caused a 0.5% decrease from the sample initial weight, letting unchanged the sample appearance and its original thickness.

ChCl:EG clearly caused a change in the samples (see Fig. SM.3), which became whitish and decreased in transparency, showing evident softening of the plastic and a weight loss of 3.15%. This was expected at such long treatment times since previous researches showed the capability of ChCl:EG and other Choline chloride-based DES to solubilize cellulose(41, 42).

B:EG induced a less pronounced whitish discoloration and loss of transparency, but no conclusive weight changes were observed on the samples. Finally, B:U seemed to have no effects on CN samples.

After observing the solubilization effects of each DES on fully immersed CN samples, their effect when applied directly on a clean CN film support with ctsw was assessed.

The surface OM photomicrographs (Fig. SM.4) show that after applying all three DES, the treated areas did not have any distinctive changes on their surface.

The film depth variations measured by cross-section photos under UV light and the µATR-FTIR spectra (results not shown) indicated that the thickness of the films did not vary, and that no DES residues were found on the surface after the test.

3.4 Cleaning test results

The different treatments were applied to remove gelatin residues from the back side of the degraded movies described in section 3.1.

First, traditional cleaning systems (EtOH and IPOH) were tested and evaluated.

OM surface photomicrographs recorded after the treatment showed that IPOH (Fig. 7I) did not remove the gelatin residues over the treated area, whereas EtOH (Fig. 7II) showed a better performance, but still abundant gelatin residues remained covering wide areas of the surface after the treatment. µATR-FTIR analyses and cross section photomicrographs (Fig. 7) confirm that thick gelatin residues remain after both treatments, with thicknesses up to 13 and 6 µm respectively; presenting spectra acquired after cleaning which show a strong band at ca. 1539 cm^− 1, ascribable to the amide II vibration mode.

In comparison, cleaning tests using all the three DES formulations showed a much more efficient cleaning efficacy.

From Fig. 8, we can observe that after the treatments the presence of gelatin residues was considerably and homogeneously reduced in all the treated surfaces. The documentation of the surface topography revealed that only a few, thin and well localized gelatin residues remained. There was no evident difference in cleaning efficiency among the three tested DES solvents with the method employed.

Accordingly, cross section analysis of samples collected after the treatment (Fig.9) showed that after the treatments with all three DES, residues were few and drastically reduced in thickness, with average depths between 2 and 1 µm. Due to their transparency, thinness and number, these residues are not detectable with naked aye observation and remain hard to locate even at higher magnification. Therefore, it is less likely that they create a relevant impact during image scanning using transmitted light.

Interestingly, no damage was detected during OM surface documentation after any of the tests (Fig. 8), including scratches and gloss changes induced by mechanical action during cleaning.

Cross section photomicrographs (Fig. 9) also proved that after treatment, the CN base did not show detectable thickness changes, with minor differences being likely due to intrinsic base depth variability.

The vast majority of the µFTIR-ATR spectra acquired on each cleaned area (Fig. 10) did not show the bands associated to gelatin and the ones related to the DES solvents, confirming that the treatment not only resulted effective in removing the gelatin, but also left no major solvent residues. In particular, solvent residues were less frequently detected during µFTIR-ATR analysis on the areas treated with ChCl:EG.

All remaining DES/gelatin residues were punctual and very constrained spatially over the cleaned surface. Most were transparent, and all had diameters of less than 0.39 mm.

Overall, all three DES showed good cleaning action, with equivalent efficiency for the removal of gelatin when applied by cotton swab. None of these solvents created damage to the CN base. In particular, ChCl:EG showed lower viscosity than the other two DES, which increased control over the area of application and facilitated the monitoring of the cleaning level during the treatment, whereas the more viscous Betaine-based DES tended to obscure the surface during treatment and made it difficult to assess the cleaning level until removal with IPOH. Moreover, ChCl:EG seemed to be more easily removed after the treatment by application of an IPOH-soaked cotton swab.

All the three formulations proved to be efficient in the removal of photographic gelatin residues from cinematographic CN bases using cotton swabs for application, so they are suitable for restoration purposes when followed by careful IPOH application for removal of DES residues. At short application times, DES seem innocuous towards polymeric film bases.

DES solvents seem particularly promising for the treatment of degraded CN film bases, and for separating glued cinematographic and photographic material before they arrive to the hockey puck state.

Further research is ongoing to test the applicability of these new solvents through the use of carrying semirigid absorbing materials, to remove the mechanical action of the cotton swab.

B, Betaine; ChCl, Choline Chloride; CN, Cellulose Nitrate; DES, Deep Eutectic Solvents; EtOH, Ethanol; EG, Ethylene Glycol; IPOH, Isopropyl Alcohol, Optical Microscopy (OM), Micro-Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (µATR-FTIR), black and white (B&W), Degree of Substitution (DS), Hydrogen Bond Acceptor (HBA), Hydrogen Bond Donor (HBD), cotton swab (ctsw), Bright Field (BF), Dark Field (DF), mercury–cadmium–telluride (MCT).

Availability of data and materials

The data used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was supported by the Emilia-Romagna Region [European Social Fund Scholarship for PhD Research Projects; 2014/2020 program. Project title: RICORDACI-Ricerca sulla conservazione, restauro e diagnosi di film cinematografici, approved DGR 886/2016]. The funding body had no incidence on the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Authors' contributions

MVCL: Designed and performed the research, curated, analyzed and interpreted the data, and wrote the original draft. SP: Contributed to design the research; reviewed, edited, and provided validation for the work. GS: Contributed to design the research, reviewed and edited the work. RM: Reviewed the work.

Acknowledgements

We heartily thank the Fondazione Cineteca di Bologna and the specialists from L’Immagine Ritrovata S.r.l. (Marianna de Sanctis, Maura Psichedda and Lara Nobili) for supporting the research, for providing the studied samples and for providing access their facilities for the necessary testing.

Read P, Meyer M-P. Restoration of motion picture film. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000. 359 p. (Butterworth-Heinemann series in conservation and museology).
Bereijo A. The conservation and preservation of film and magnetic materials (1): film materials. Libr Rev. 2004 Aug;53(6):323–31.
Edward Chauncey Worden. Nitrocellulose Industry [Internet]. 1911 [cited 2020 Apr 24]. Available from: http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.163826
Nunes S, Ramacciotti F, Neves A, Angelin EM, Ramos AM, Roldão É, et al. A diagnostic tool for assessing the conservation condition of cellulose nitrate and acetate in heritage collections: quantifying the degree of substitution by infrared spectroscopy. Herit Sci. 2020 Dec;8(1):33.
FilmCare.org [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 30]. Available from: https://www.filmcare.org/vd_binder.php
Catelli E, Sciutto G, Prati S, Chavez Lozano MV, Gatti L, Lugli F, et al. A new miniaturised short-wave infrared (SWIR) spectrometer for on-site cultural heritage investigations. Talanta. 2020 Oct;218:121112.
Haist GM. Modern Photographic Processing. Wiley; 1979. 806 p.
Nguyen T-P, Lavédrine B, Flieder F. Effects of N02 and S02 on the Degradation of Photographic Gelatin. Imaging Sci J. 1997 Jan 1;45(3–4):239–43.
Johnston-Banks FA. Gelatine. In: Harris P, editor. Food Gels [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1990 [cited 2021 Jan 21]. p. 233–89. (Elsevier Applied Food Science Series). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0755-3_7
Bella J. Collagen structure: new tricks from a very old dog. Biochem J. 2016 Apr 8;473(8):1001–25.
Balakhnina IA, Brandt NN, Mankova AA, Chikishev AYu. The problem of manifestation of tertiary structure in the vibrational spectra of proteins. Vib Spectrosc. 2021 May 1;114:103250.
Derkach SR, Kuchina YA, Baryshnikov AV, Kolotova DS, Voron’ko NG. Tailoring Cod Gelatin Structure and Physical Properties with Acid and Alkaline Extraction. 2019;17.
Bai C, Wei Q, Ren X. Selective Extraction of Collagen Peptides with High Purity from Cod Skins by Deep Eutectic Solvents. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2017 Aug 7;5(8):7220–7.
Li N, Wang Y, Xu K, Huang Y, Wen Q, Ding X. Development of green betaine-based deep eutectic solvent aqueous two-phase system for the extraction of protein. Talanta. 2016 May;152:23–32.
Jia Y, Sciutto G, Botteon A, Conti C, Focarete ML, Gualandi C, et al. Deep eutectic solvent and agar: a new green gel to remove proteinaceous-based varnishes from paintings. J Cult Herit. 2021 Sep 1;51:138–44.
Abbott AP, Capper G, Davies DL, Rasheed RK, Tambyrajah V. Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures. Chem Commun. 2003 Jan 1;(1):70–1.
Li W, Zhang Z, Han B, Hu S, Song J, Xie Y, et al. Switching the basicity of ionic liquids by CO2. Green Chem. 2008 Nov 1;10(11):1142–5.
Smith EL, Abbott AP, Ryder KS. Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) and Their Applications. Chem Rev. 2014 Nov 12;114(21):11060–82.
Lin JC, Gant N. Chapter 2.3 - The Biochemistry of Choline. In: Stagg C, Rothman D, editors. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy [Internet]. San Diego: Academic Press; 2014 [cited 2021 Nov 9]. p. 104–10. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124016880000082
Francisco M, van den Bruinhorst A, Kroon MC. Low-Transition-Temperature Mixtures (LTTMs): A New Generation of Designer Solvents. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52(11):3074–85.
Zahrina I, Nasikin M, Mulia K. Evaluation of the interaction between molecules during betaine monohydrate-organic acid deep eutectic mixture formation. J Mol Liq. 2017 Jan 1;225:446–50.
Guo Y-C, Cai C, Zhang Y-H. Observation of conformational changes in ethylene glycol–water complexes by FTIR–ATR spectroscopy and computational studies. AIP Adv. 2018 May;8(5):055308.
Wagle DV, Deakyne CA, Baker GA. Quantum Chemical Insight into the Interactions and Thermodynamics Present in Choline Chloride Based Deep Eutectic Solvents. J Phys Chem B. 2016 Jul 14;120(27):6739–46.
Simeonov SP, Afonso CAM. Basicity and stability of urea deep eutectic mixtures. RSC Adv. 2016 Jan 12;6(7):5485–90.
Zeng C-X, Qi S-J, Xin R-P, Yang B, Wang Y-H. Synergistic behavior of betaine–urea mixture: Formation of deep eutectic solvent. J Mol Liq. 2016 Jul;219:74–8.
Preibisch S, Saalfeld S, Tomancak P. Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions. Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 1;25(11):1463–5.
Prati S, Sciutto G, Bonacini I, Mazzeo R. New Frontiers in Application of FTIR Microscopy for Characterization of Cultural Heritage Materials. Top Curr Chem. 2016 Apr 28;374(3):26.
Mazzeo R, Joseph E, Prati S, Millemaggi A. Attenuated Total Reflection–Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopic mapping for the characterisation of paint cross-sections. Anal Chim Acta. 2007 Sep;599(1):107–17.
Quye A, Littlejohn D, Pethrick RA, Stewart RA. Investigation of inherent degradation in cellulose nitrate museum artefacts. Polym Degrad Stab. 2011 Jul;96(7):1369–76.
Izzo FC, Carrieri A, Bartolozzi G, Keulen H van, Lorenzon I, Balliana E, et al. Elucidating the composition and the state of conservation of nitrocellulose-based animation cells by means of non-invasive and micro-destructive techniques. J Cult Herit [Internet]. 2018 Oct [cited 2018 Nov 29]; Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1296207418301134
Kovalenko VI, Mukhamadeeva RM, Maklakova LN, Gustova NG. Interpretation of the IR spectrum and structure of cellulose nitrate. J Struct Chem. 1994;34(4):540–7.
Noohi S, Asadian H. Application of FTIR Microscopy to Identify Some Glass Plates of Golestan Palace Photo Archive. Nian Conserv Sci J. 2017 Sep 1;01(01):48–53.
Miller FA, Wilkins CH. Infrared Spectra and Characteristic Frequencies of Inorganic Ions. Anal Chem. 1952 Aug 19;24(8):1253–94.
Viertorinne M, Valkonen J, Pitkänen I, Mathlouthi M, Nurmi J. Crystal and molecular structure of anhydrous betaine, (CH3)3NCH2CO2. J Mol Struct. 1999 Mar 16;477(1):23–9.
Biernacki K, Souza HKS, Almeida CMR, Magalhães AL, Gonçalves MP. Physicochemical Properties of Choline Chloride-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents with Polyols: An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020 Dec 21;8(50):18712–28.
Du C, Zhao B, Chen X-B, Birbilis N, Yang H. Effect of water presence on choline chloride-2urea ionic liquid and coating platings from the hydrated ionic liquid. Sci Rep. 2016 Jul;6(1):29225.
Baran J, Barnes AJ, Engelen B, Panthöfer M, Pietraszko A, Ratajczak H, et al. Structure and polarised IR and Raman spectra of the solid complex betaine–trichloroacetic acid. J Mol Struct. 2000 Sep 5;550–551:21–41.
Grdadolnik J, Maréchal Y. Urea and urea–water solutions—an infrared study. J Mol Struct. 2002 Sep;615(1–3):177–89.
Ilczyszyn MM, Ratajczak H. Polarized vibrational spectra of betaine monohydrate single crystal. Vib Spectrosc. 1996 Jan;10(2):177–89.
Krishnan K, Krishnan RS. Raman and infrared spectra of ethylene glycol. Proc Indian Acad Sci - Sect A. 1966 Aug;64(2):111.
Häkkinen R, Abbott A. Solvation of carbohydrates in five choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents and the implication for cellulose solubility. Green Chem. 2019;21(17):4673–82.
Zdanowicz M, Wilpiszewska K, Spychaj T. Deep eutectic solvents for polysaccharides processing. A review. Carbohydr Polym. 2018 Nov;200:361–80.

No competing interests reported.

GraphicalAbstract.png

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
16 Apr, 2022
Reviews received at journal
30 Mar, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
16 Mar, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
16 Mar, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
16 Mar, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
16 Mar, 2022
First submitted to journal
10 Mar, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Deep Eutectic Solvents: green solvents for the removal of degraded gelatin on cellulose nitrate cinematographic films

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1. Introduction

2. Experimental

2.1 Aim of study

2.2 Materials

2.3 Cinematographic film sample

2.4 DES preparation

2.5 Solubility tests

2.6 Cleaning procedure

2.7 Evaluation of the cleaning performance

2.7.1 Surface and Cross section observation with Optical Microscopy using visible and UV lights

2.7.2 Cross section preparation

2.7.3 FTIR spectroscopy

3. Results And Discussion

3.1 Characterization of the film sample:

3.2 Characterization of the DES solvents

3.3 Solubility tests results

3.4 Cleaning test results

4. Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1