We present various measures, specifically the expected life-years list due to a cause of death, that can be predicted for a specific covariate pattern to facilitate interpretation in observational studies. These can also be summarised at the population-level using standardisation to obtain marginal measures. The restricted mean survival time (RMST) measure can be obtained in the presence of competing risks using Royston-Parmar flexible parametric survival models (FPMs). Royston-Parmar FPMs can be fitted on either the cause-specific hazards or cumulative incidence scale in the presence of competing risks. An advantage of modelling within this framework for competing risks data is the ease at which other alternative predictions to the (cause-specific or subdistribution) hazard ratio can be obtained. The RMST estimate is one such measure. This has an attractive interpretation, especially when the proportionality assumption is violated. In addition to this, compared to similar measures, fewer assumptions are required and it does not require extrapolation. Furthermore, one can easily obtain the expected number of life-years lost, or gained, due to a particular cause of death, which is a further useful prognostic measure. We describe estimation of RMST after fitting a FPM on either the log-cumulative subdistribution, or cause-specific hazards scale. As an illustration of reporting such measures to facilitate interpretation of a competing risks analysis, models are fitted to English colorectal data.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8
The full text of this article is available to read as a PDF.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
On 19 Jan, 2021
Received 18 Jan, 2021
Invitations sent on 10 Jan, 2021
On 10 Jan, 2021
On 22 Dec, 2020
On 22 Dec, 2020
On 22 Dec, 2020
Posted 15 Oct, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
Received 01 Nov, 2020
Invitations sent on 13 Oct, 2020
On 13 Oct, 2020
On 09 Oct, 2020
On 08 Oct, 2020
On 07 Oct, 2020
On 02 Sep, 2020
Received 27 Aug, 2020
Received 25 Mar, 2020
On 24 Feb, 2020
On 24 Feb, 2020
Invitations sent on 21 Feb, 2020
On 14 Feb, 2020
On 13 Feb, 2020
On 13 Feb, 2020
On 12 Feb, 2020
On 19 Jan, 2021
Received 18 Jan, 2021
Invitations sent on 10 Jan, 2021
On 10 Jan, 2021
On 22 Dec, 2020
On 22 Dec, 2020
On 22 Dec, 2020
Posted 15 Oct, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
Received 01 Nov, 2020
Invitations sent on 13 Oct, 2020
On 13 Oct, 2020
On 09 Oct, 2020
On 08 Oct, 2020
On 07 Oct, 2020
On 02 Sep, 2020
Received 27 Aug, 2020
Received 25 Mar, 2020
On 24 Feb, 2020
On 24 Feb, 2020
Invitations sent on 21 Feb, 2020
On 14 Feb, 2020
On 13 Feb, 2020
On 13 Feb, 2020
On 12 Feb, 2020
We present various measures, specifically the expected life-years list due to a cause of death, that can be predicted for a specific covariate pattern to facilitate interpretation in observational studies. These can also be summarised at the population-level using standardisation to obtain marginal measures. The restricted mean survival time (RMST) measure can be obtained in the presence of competing risks using Royston-Parmar flexible parametric survival models (FPMs). Royston-Parmar FPMs can be fitted on either the cause-specific hazards or cumulative incidence scale in the presence of competing risks. An advantage of modelling within this framework for competing risks data is the ease at which other alternative predictions to the (cause-specific or subdistribution) hazard ratio can be obtained. The RMST estimate is one such measure. This has an attractive interpretation, especially when the proportionality assumption is violated. In addition to this, compared to similar measures, fewer assumptions are required and it does not require extrapolation. Furthermore, one can easily obtain the expected number of life-years lost, or gained, due to a particular cause of death, which is a further useful prognostic measure. We describe estimation of RMST after fitting a FPM on either the log-cumulative subdistribution, or cause-specific hazards scale. As an illustration of reporting such measures to facilitate interpretation of a competing risks analysis, models are fitted to English colorectal data.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8
The full text of this article is available to read as a PDF.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...