Serum vitamin D levels and acute kidney injury: A systemic review and meta-analysis

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1443906/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Serum vitamin D levels and acute kidney injury: A systemic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1443906/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background: Numerous researches have evaluated the prevalence and clinical outcome of vitamin D deficiency in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). But the quantitative vitamin D status in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients and its relationship with prognosis remains controversial. We conducted this systemic review and meta-analysis to assess the quantitative difference of vitamin D status, including serum 25(OH) D and 1,25(OH)2D levels，between AKI patients and non-AKI controls, and further explore whether vitamin D status can be clearly correlated with the mortality of AKI.

Methods: Major databases, including PubMed, Web of Science and EBSCO, were searched until 1st September 2021. All published observational studies related to vitamin D and AKI According to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3.5.

Results: Four studies including five cohorts were included with a total of 413 patients. The serum 25(OH)D levels showed no statistically significant difference in AKI patients and non-AKI controls. On the other hand, the serum 1,25(OH)2D levels were significant lower in AKI patients than in non-AKI controls (MD=-17.79, 95% CI =-32.73 to -2.85, P = 0.02). As for the relationship between serum vitamin D status and AKI patients’ mortality, we were unable to give a consistent conclusion based on current limited and conflict study results.

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggested that serum 1,25(OH)2D levels, rather than 25(OH)D, is significantly lower in AKI patients. The relationship between vitamin D status and clinical outcome of AKI remains controversial based on current evidence. Future comprehensive studies are required to confirm these relations and to elucidate potential mechanisms.

acute kidney injury

25(OH)D

25(OH)2D

mortality

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common clinical complication and one of the key factors affecting the prognosis of patients. Although continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been widely used, the mortality of critically ill patients with AKI is still relatively high. Observational studies suggest that the elevated mortality in AKI patients cannot be explained solely by the increased complications. Kidney injury itself is an independent risk factor of adverse events^{[1, 2]}. Since kidney is also an important endocrine organ, kidney injury is often accompanied by disorders of endocrine and mineral metabolism, including vitamin D system dysfunction^[3].

In humans, most vitamin D is synthesized in the skin under UV-irradiation, and a small part is absorbed from dietary^[4]. Vitamin D is first converted into 25(OH)D in the liver by 25-hydroxylase and subsequently into 1,25(OH)2D in the kidney by 1-α hydroxylase^[5]. The half-life of vitamin D, 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D is 24h, 3 weeks and 4h, respectively^[6]. Thus, the nutritional status of vitamin D in the published literatures and clinical practice usually refers to serum 25 (OH) D levels. 1,25(OH)2D is the main bioactive metabolite of vitamin D and can exert the greatest physiological effect^[7]. However, it is less often measured in the clinical practice due to its short half-life. In addition to regulating calcium and phosphorus metabolism and maintaining bone and mineral homeostasis, vitamin D also plays important role in tumors, cardiovascular system, autoimmune system and endocrine system^[8-10].

Hydroxylation of 25(OH)D into 1,25(OH)2D takes place mainly in the inner mitochondrial membrane of the renal proximal tubule epithelium, which is quite vulnerable during AKI. This leads to our reasonable assumptions that vitamin D status, especially 1,25(OH)2D levels, may be decreased in AKI patients. Numerous researches have evaluated the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, typically reported as 25(OH)D, in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and it is associated with mortality^{[1, 2, 11, 12]}. But relative fewer studies focused on the correlation between AKI and vitamin D status, including the 25(OH) D and 1,25(OH)2D levels, and its relationship with prognosis remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this systemic review and meta-analysis to assess the serum 25(OH) D and 1,25(OH)2D levels in AKI patients, and further explore whether vitamin D status can be clearly correlated with the mortality of AKI.

Study selection

We searched the PubMed, Web of Science and EBSCO for studies published up to 1st September 2021. Following search terms: vitamin D, 25(OH) vitamin D, 25(OH) D, 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D, AKI, acute kidney injury, acute renal injury were used. ‘OR’ was used as the set operator to combine different sets of results. Furthermore, references of relevant reviews and included articles were searched manually to identify additional studies.

Studies were included if they met the following criteria:1)Predefined AKI; 2) Adult patients with AKI(aged≥18 years old，human beings); 3) The study should include quantitative data of serum 25(OH)D and /or 1,25(OH)₂D levels; 4) For duplicate or overlapping data, including only the most recent or comprehensive data; 5) language was restricted to English only.

Exclusive criteria were as follows:1) studies that conducted in animals or children;2) a document in which the required data cannot be extracted due to unclear or erroneous data;3）review articles or case reports; 4) use of medications containing vitamin D or calcium.

Two investigators (HRZ and YJ) independently reviewed all identified articles for eligibility using the above criteria. The titles and abstracts of the identified articles were reviewed, and those deemed ineligible were excluded. The full text of the remainder of the articles was retrieved and reviewed. Discrepancies on whether to include a study were resolved by discussion.

Data extraction

The data extracted from each included study by two separate reviewers (HRZ and YJ) included the authors, year of publication, design of the trial, sex, sample size, follow-up, the quantitative value of 25(OH)D and/or 1,25(OH)2D between AKI patients and non-AKI controls. Discrepancies in data abstraction were resolved by discussion. The data were reviewed to identify duplicate studies and duplicate reporting of populations. Only the most comprehensive studies were retained.

Quality assessment

Two investigators (HRZ and YJ) independently evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), which including selection (04 points), comparability (0-2 points) and outcome (0-3 points). Discrepancies on quality assessment were resolved by discussion.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the REVIEW MANAGER 5.3 statistical software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Quantitative vitamin D values in 3 of the 4 included articles were recorded in the form of mean ± standard deviation (SD), while the remaining one recorded in the form of medium (25%-75% IQR). To unify data, we transformed medium (25%-75% IQR) to mean ±SD. Lai's study included two control groups, age- and gender-matched healthy subjects(h) and critically ill patients without AKI(i). Therefore, we compared these two control groups with the experimental group (AKI) separately as two cohorts, while AKI group’s sample size was divided half in each cohort. For continuous variables, we calculated the pooled Mean Deference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with the Inverse-Variance method using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 measure of inconsistency, statistically significant if I2 was >50%. For all the outcomes a P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study characteristics

The flow diagram for study selection is displayed in Fig. 1. A total of 446 records through searching the electronic database and 27 in the reference list articles identified. After removing duplicate publications, 128 studies were retrieved for title and abstract review. A total of 20 studies went further for full-text evaluation. 11 studies were excluded due to inconsistent study and grouping methods;2 were excluded because the report form cannot be used to calculate the results, 2 because repetition of research; 1 because we could not reach the author. We eliminated two overlapping data, including only the most recent or comprehensive data. Lai's study^[13]contains two control groups, age- and gender-matched healthy subjects(h) and critically ill patients without AKI(i), so it is divided into 2 cohorts. Finally, four studies with five cohorts fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were suitable for the analysis.

The characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table 1. Total sample size of four studies was 413. Methodological quality of the included studies using the NOS are presented in table 2. All the enrolled articles showed moderate to high quality.

Vitamin D values in AKI patients and non-AKI controls

To assess the quantitative difference of vitamin D status between AKI patients and non-AKI controls, five cohorts provided data on serum 25(OH)D level, and four on serum 1,25(OH)2D level. The average 25(OH)D levels in AKI patients was not significant different compared to non-AKI controls (MD=-7.04, 95% CI =-15.57 to 1.49, P = 0.11) (Fig. 2a), which showed significant heterogeneity (I2=96%, p＜0.0001). The average 1,25(OH)2D levels were significant lower in AKI patients than that in non-AKI controls (MD=-17.79, 95% CI =-32.73 to -2.85, P = 0.02) (Fig. 2b), which also exhibited great heterogeneity (I2=95%, p＜0.0001). After sensitivity analysis, removing Vijiyuan et al.^[6]significantly reduced this heterogeneity (I2 = 0, p = 0.45), without much impact on the outcome of 1,25(OH)2D levels (MD=-11.04, 95% CI =-15.57 to -6.50, P＜0.01) (Fig. 2c).

We further performed a subgroup analysis based on two different control populations, which were divided into healthy subjects(h) subgroup and critically ill patients without AKI(i) subgroup. The serum 25(OH)D levels remained no significant difference in both subgroups. (Fig. 3a). The serum 1,25(OH)2D levels tend to be lower in AKI patients than in healthy subjects (MD= -22.91, 95% CI = -45.44 to -0.38, P = 0.05) (Fig. 3b), but did not reach statistical difference. The serum 1,25 (OH)2 D levels were significant lower in AKI patients than critically ill patients without AKI (MD=-11.59, 95% CI = -18.89 to -4.30, P = 0.02) (Fig. 3b).

Relationship between vitamin D levels and prognosis of AKI

Of three included studies reporting AKI patients’ clinical outcome, only Vijayan^[6] provided quantitative data on vitamin D levels between the non-survivors and survivors among the AKI patients. Their study found that 1,25(OH)2D levels were significant higher in non-survivors than survivors (62±41.4 pg/mL vs. 33.7±24.2 pg/mL, P = 0.046), while 25(OH)D levels did not differ between two groups. However, higher levels of 1,25(OH)2D was not associated with mortality in AKI patients on multivariate regression analysis t after adjusting for age and APACHE II. Lai^[13]grouped the patients with AKI according to median serum vitamin D concentrations. They come to the conclusion there was no association between the serum vitamin D levels, both 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D, and all-cause mortality in AKI patients. Similarly, Leaf reported that hospital mortality of AKI patients was not associated with 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D after adjusting for age and serum creatinine.

Therefore, the relationship between vitamin D levels and mortality in AKI patients remains controversial. We are unable to give a consistent conclusion for this problem based on current limited and conflict study results. More comprehensive trials with sufficient power and longer follow-up duration are needed to draw a clear conclusion.

The kidney plays an important role in maintaining the stability of vitamin D system. Relationship between vitamin D status and CKD has been deeply researched^[14]. Abundant evidence suggest that vitamin D supplementation can improve CKD patients’ prognosis^[3]. However, less is known about the changes of vitamin D levels during AKI and its association with clinical outcome. In order to answer above problem, we conducted this systemic review and meta-analysis with great curiosity. Our study showed that AKI patients had a lower serum 1,25(OH)₂D levels compared to non-AKI controls, while there was no difference in 25(OH) D levels between these two groups. Presently, we still cannot draw any definite conclusion for the association between vitamin D status and the mortality of AKI, due to limited published data. 1,25(OH)2D is formed mainly in the mitochondria of the proximal renal tubules by 1-α hydroxylase^{[5, 15]}. 1,25(OH)2D is the main bioactive metabolite of vitamin D and can exert the greatest physiological effect. But it is less detected in the clinical practice due to its short half-time. Instead,25 (OH) D is often used to reflect the vitamin status of the human body as it is convenient to detection and has a relative longer half-time. Renal tubules are vulnerable to injuries when AKI occurs, which may result in vitamin D system dysfunction. Therefore, we compared the serum levels both of 25 (OH) D and 1,25(OH) 2D in patients with AKI to understand the true vitamin status in vivo.

The beneficial role of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D in CKD has been widely described in previous studies^[14]. 1a-hydroxylase exists mainly in the renal proximal tubules. As the CKD progresses, the glomerulus gradually sclerosis, the tubule and interstitium gradually atrophy, and the amount of 1α hydroxylase decreases, resulting in 1,25(OH)2D deficiency. It is reported that vitamin D deficiency contributes to the burden of cardiovascular and total mortality in patients with CKD^[16]. In a small study, Vitamin D supplementation reduced inflammatory cytokines such as IL-8, IL-6, and TNFα in chronic hemodialysis patients^[17]. Vitamin D analogs have also been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects in patients with CKD^[18]. The role of vitamin D in CKD has aroused our curiosity about its role in AKI.

Our study showed that AKI patients had a lower serum 1,25(OH)₂D levels compared to non-AKI controls. We speculate that when patients suffer from AKI, ischemia and necrosis of renal tubules, especially proximal tubules, may lead to sudden dysfunction or sudden decrease of 1a-hydroxylase, thus reducing the transformation to1,25(OH)₂D^[3]. Leaf studies^[4]found that fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) levels were significantly increased during AKI. FGF-23 could down-regulate the expression of renal 1α hydroxylase, thereby reducing the level of blood 1,25(OH)₂D. Basic researches are needed to confirm these hypothesis

Based on current evidence, our study cannot draw the clear conclusion on the relationship between vitamin D status and the mortality of AKI. Only Vijayan's study^[6] give the quantitative data on vitamin D levels between the non-survivors and survivors among the AKI patients. They found that the1,25(OH)₂D levels were higher in non-survivors, but the 25(OH)D levels did not differ between groups. Their interpretation of this conclusion is that kidney is the main organ for active vitamin D production, but not the only organ. Macrophages in vivo can also stimulate the secretion of 1-α hydroxylase, leading to an increase in the level of 1,25(OH) 2D in the kidney^[6],Unlike Vijayan's study, Lai’s^[13]study and Leaf’s study^[4]did not give quantitative vitamin D data. They divided AKI patients into different groups according to medium vitamin D concentrations and concluded that no association exists between the serum vitamin D levels and all-cause mortality. Unfortunately, since the specific value of vitamin D levels between the death group and the survival group in their studies were not available, we could not conduct a meta-analysis for this question. Comprehensive studies are required to confirm these relations and to elucidate potential mechanisms in the future.

To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis and systemic review to investigate serum vitamin D levels in AKI. However, some limitations in our study should be noted. First, since there are few studies in this area, only 4 studies with 5 cohorts were included in this paper. During study selection, one was eliminated because it is a non-quantitative description^[19], and the other cohort study of 428 people in Egypt^[20]found that 25(OH)D levels of patients in the AKI group were lower than those in the non-AKI group, presenting the results in medium(50% IQR).We attempted to contact the author for 25%-75% IQR data but unfortunately did not receive a response. It is not included in our study and may could lead to bias. Secondly, all the articles in this paper are observational studies and lack of multi-center and large-cohort RCT studies, so it is difficult to determine the causal relationship. Different from animal experiments, it is very difficult to conduct large randomized controlled trials in critically ill patients due to the characteristics of clinical studies and ethical review. We can only describe the existing results for the time being and cannot draw very definite conclusions. We hope more studies will fill in the blanks in the future.

The pooled estimates from the observational studies show serum 1,25(OH)₂D levels, rather than 25(OH)D, is significantly lower in AKI patients when compared to non-AKI controls. The relationship between vitamin D status and clinical outcome of AKI remains controversial based on current evidence. Vitamin D is a very promising biomarker and a potential treatment for AKI. Larger studies are required to evaluate its relationship and elucidate potential mechanisms in the further.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Authors’ Contributions

Huanran Zhang and Yan Jiang contribute equally to this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: LQ19H050009) and the Foundation of Key Discipline Construction of Zhejiang Province for Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. 2017-XKA36)

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

Investigators RRTS, Bellomo R, Cass A, Cole L, Finfer S, Gallagher M, et al. Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1627-38.
Braun AB, Gibbons FK, Litonjua AA, Giovannucci E, Christopher KB. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at critical care initiation is associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:63-72.
Duranton F, Rodriguez-Ortiz ME, Duny Y, Rodriguez M, Daures JP, Argiles A. Vitamin D treatment and mortality in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Nephrol 2013; 37:239-48.
Leaf DE, Wolf M, Waikar SS, Chase H, Christov M, Cremers S, et al. FGF-23 levels in patients with AKI and risk of adverse outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 7:1217-23.
Coburn JW, Hartenbower DL, Norman AW. Metabolism and action of the hormone vitamin D. Its relation to diseases of calcium homeostasis. West J Med 1974; 121:22-44.
Vijayan A, Li T, Dusso A, Jain S, Coyne DW. Relationship of 1,25 dihydroxy Vitamin D Levels to Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury. J Nephrol Ther 2015; 5.
Christakos S, Dhawan P, Verstuyf A, Verlinden L, Carmeliet G. Vitamin D: Metabolism, Molecular Mechanism of Action, and Pleiotropic Effects. Physiol Rev 2016; 96:365-408.
Alshahrani F, Aljohani N. Vitamin D: deficiency, sufficiency and toxicity. Nutrients 2013; 5:3605-16.
Kechichian E, Ezzedine K. Vitamin D and the Skin: An Update for Dermatologists. Am J Clin Dermatol 2018; 19:223-235.
Zittermann A, Pilz S. Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update. Anticancer Res 2019; 39:4627-4635.
Liu WC, Wu CC, Hung YM, Liao MT, Shyu JF, Lin YF, et al. Pleiotropic effects of vitamin D in chronic kidney disease. Clin Chim Acta 2016; 453:1-12.
Teng M, Wolf M, Lowrie E, Ofsthun N, Lazarus JM, Thadhani R. Survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis with paricalcitol or calcitriol therapy. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:446-56.
Lai L, Qian J, Yang Y, Xie Q, You H, Zhou Y, et al. Is the serum vitamin D level at the time of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury diagnosis associated with prognosis? PLoS One 2013; 8:e64964.
Eleftheriadis T, Antoniadi G, Liakopoulos V, Antoniadis N, Stefanidis I, Galaktidou G. Vitamin D receptor activators and response to injury in kidney diseases. J Nephrol 2010; 23:514-24.
Zhou XJ, Rakheja D, Yu X, Saxena R, Vaziri ND, Silva FG. The aging kidney. Kidney Int 2008; 74:710-20.
Dobnig H, Pilz S, Scharnagl H, Renner W, Seelhorst U, Wellnitz B, et al. Independent association of low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin d and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin d levels with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168:1340-9.
Stubbs JR, Idiculla A, Slusser J, Menard R, Quarles LD. Cholecalciferol supplementation alters calcitriol-responsive monocyte proteins and decreases inflammatory cytokines in ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21:353-61.
Alborzi P, Patel NA, Peterson C, Bills JE, Bekele DM, Bunaye Z, et al. Paricalcitol reduces albuminuria and inflammation in chronic kidney disease: a randomized double-blind pilot trial. Hypertension 2008; 52:249-55.
Cameron LK, Lei K, Smith S, Doyle NL, Doyle JF, Flynn K, et al. Vitamin D levels in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a protocol for a prospective cohort study (VID-AKI). BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016486.
Fayed A, Abdulazim DO, Amin M, Elhadidy S, Samir HH, Salem MM, et al. Serum sclerostin in acute kidney injury patients. Nefrologia (Engl Ed) 2021.

Table 1. Summary of characteristics of the included studies

Reference

Country

Study design

Sample size

AKI group

non-AKI group

Sample size

Age

male

25（OH）D(ng/ml)

1,25（OH）_２D(pg/ml)

Sample size

Age

male sex%

25‐OH Vitmin D(ng/ml)

1,25（OH）_２D（pg/ml）

Anitha Vijayan，2015

American

Prospective cohort study

51.9±17.8

13.0±6.3

42±5.6

45.3±16.9

29.2±9.4

76.1±5.3

Lai,2013 h

China

Prospective cohort study

117

100

63.7± 18.8

147

13.9±5.8

24.8±22.0

56.1± 18.7

11.3±3.6

35.9±14.7

Lai,2013 i

China

Prospective cohort study

113

100

63.7± 18.8

147

13.9±5.8

24.8±22.0

55.7±16.3

12.9±6.5

41.2±16.5

David E. Leaf.2013

American

Prospective cohort study

57 (50-64)

9.07±8.56

16.29±9.34

56 (45-61)

14.36±10.12

25±15.57

Murat Gunay 2019

Turkey

Prospective cohort study

11.1±9.3

38.5

11.3±12.9

Table 2 Quality assessment of included studies

Author	Representativeness of the exposed cohort	Selection of the non exposed cohort	Ascertainment	Outcome was not present at start of study	Select the most important factor	Indicate specific control for a second important factor	Assessment of outcome	Follow-up time	Adequacy of follow-up	Quality
Anitha Vijayan，2015	*		*	*	*	*	*	*	*	High
Lai,2013	*	*	*	*	*	*	*	*		High
David E. Leaf.2013	*	*	*	*	*	*	*	*	*	High
Murat Gunay 2019	*		*	*	*	*	*	*	*	High

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Serum vitamin D levels and acute kidney injury: A systemic review and meta-analysis

Archived Versions:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Tables

Additional Declarations

Archived Versions:

Version 1