2.1 Materials
Dexamethasone was obtained as a gift sample from Fourt’s India Lab. Pvt. Ltd, Chennai. Cholesterol, span 60, tween 20, tween 80, carbopol, methanol, and chloroform were obtained from Loba Chemie Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India. Triethanolamine was obtained from Rankem Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, India.
2.2 Methods
2.2.1 Preformulation studies of Dexamethasone
The melting point of Dexamethasone was determined by capillary tube method using melting apparatus. The lambda max of Dexamethasone in phosphate buffer pH 7.4 with the concentration of 1µg/ml was scanned between 200-400 nm by UV-Visible spectrophotometer.
2.2.2 FT-IR drug-excipients compatibility study
The KBr pellet method was used to record the infrared spectra of the drug (Dexamethasone) with excipients (tween 80 and cholesterol) using a Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrophotometer (Jasco, Japan). Following a baseline correction with dried KBr, spectra of dried drug-excipient mixtures were recorded. The samples were compressed at a rate of 6 ton/nm2 to make KBr pellets. The wavelength ranges were selected between 500- 4000 cm-1.
2.3 Preliminary studies for the Dexamethasone niosome
Dexamethasone niosome was formulated by a thin-film hydration method using a rotary evaporator (SUPERFIT, Rotavap, Mumbai). Different concentrations of cholesterol (15 µM, 30 µM, 50 µM) and non-ionic surfactants (Span 60, Tween 20, and Tween 80) were used in this preparation (Table 1). Non-ionic surfactant and cholesterol were dissolved in a mixture of 10 ml of chloroform and 10 ml of methanol in the molar ratio of 1:1. Chloroform and methanol were evaporated under reduced pressure at 60°C for 2 hr using a rotary evaporator. A thin film was hydrated using phosphate buffer pH 7.4 of 30 ml containing 12 mg of Dexamethasone. The formed niosome was subjected to sonication for 10 min using a bath sonicator (PCI Mumbai). The particle size, entrapment efficiency, and in vitro release of the Dexamethasone niosome were all measured.
Table 1: Quantities of surfactant and cholesterol used in the preformulation studies of niosome formulations
Formulation code
|
Amount of surfactant
(µM)
|
Amount of cholesterol(µM)
|
Amount of chloroform
(ml)
|
Amount of methanol
(ml)
|
F1
F2
F3
|
Span 60
|
15
30
50
|
10
|
10
|
100
100
100
|
F4
F5
F6
|
Tween 20
|
15
30
50
|
10
|
10
|
100
100
100
|
F7
F8
F9
|
Tween 80
|
15
30
50
|
10
|
10
|
100
100
100
|
µM is micromole, ml is a milliliter
2.4 Screening studies
For statistical optimization of Dexamethasone-loaded niosome, a 22 factorial design was utilized (Table 2). For the development of the mathematical relationship between dependent and independent variables, Design-Expert® software (Version 13, Stat-Ease) was used. Tween 80 was used to formulate several formulations of Dexamethasone niosome based on the runs. As a result, four experiments were conducted for the 22factor design. Based on the preliminary tests, the amounts of tween 80 (X1) and cholesterol (X2) were chosen as independent variables that were varied at two levels (low and high). The dependent variables are particle size (Y1), entrapment efficiency (Y2), and drug release (Y3). The resulting data were entered into the software and analyzed.
Table 2: Factorial design screening parameter
Factors (Independent variable)
|
Levels
|
Low
|
High
|
X1: Tween 80
|
50 µM
|
100 µM
|
X2: Cholesterol
|
30 µM
|
50 µM
|
Runs (TF)
|
Tween 80(µm)
|
Cholesterol(µm)
|
TF1
|
100 µM
|
30 µM
|
TF2
|
100 µM
|
50 µM
|
TF3
|
50 µM
|
30 µM
|
TF4
|
50 µM
|
50 µM
|
Response (Dependent variable)
|
Desirability characteristics
|
Y1: Particle size
|
Minimize
|
Y2: Entrapment efficiency
|
Maximize
|
Y3: Drug release
|
Maximize
|
µM is micromole, TF- Tween formulation
2.5 Preparation of optimized Dexamethasone niosome
Tween 80 (38.9 µM) and cholesterol (86.2 µM) were dissolved in a mixture of 10 ml of chloroform and 10 ml of methanol. Chloroform and methanol were evaporated under reduced pressure at 60°C for 2 hr using a rotary evaporator. A thin film was hydrated using phosphate buffer pH 7.4 of 30 ml containing 120 mg of Dexamethasone. The formed niosome was subjected to sonication for 10 min. The optimized Dexamethasone niosome were characterized for particle size, zeta potential, Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), entrapment efficiency, in vitro release, cell proliferation studies, and cell permeation studies.
2.6 Characterization of niosome
2.6.1 Analysis of particle size and zeta potential
A zeta sizer (Nano ZS90) were used to determine the particle size and zeta potential of Dexamethasone niosome at room temperature. After being diluted with distilled water, the samples were kept in a polystyrene cuvette and the measurements were computed.
2.6.2 Surface morphology
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) was used to examine the surface morphology, roughness, and diameter of the optimized Dexamethasone niosome. The sample was placed onto a slide and air-dried for 24 hr at room temperature, then AFM was imaged.
2.6.3 Determination of entrapment efficiency
Ultracentrifugation technique was used to determine the entrapment efficiency of the prepared niosome. Accurately 1 ml of the formulation was disrupted using 0.1 ml of 0.1% Triton X-100 in 2 ml of phosphate buffer pH 7.4 [12]. The solution was centrifuged at a speed of 3000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was collected and the amount of Dexamethasone was determined by UV-visible spectroscopy at 241 nm. Entrapment efficiency was calculated by:

2.6.4 In vitro release studies
In vitro release studies of niosomal formulation and the drug solution were performed by dialysis bag method using phosphate buffer pH 7.4. Accurately 1 ml of niosomal suspension was taken in a dialysis bag and placed in a 250 ml beaker containing 100 ml of phosphate buffer solution pH 7.4. At 40 rpm the solution was magnetically agitated at 37°C. Dialysate aliquots of 5 ml were taken until 6 hr and the sink conditions was maintained by replacing the same volume of buffer. The samples were analyzed using UV spectroscopy at 241 nm [12]. The same procedure was carried out for the drug solution.
2.6.5 Cell proliferation studies
The cell culture (3T3L1) was centrifuged, and using DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium) containing 10% Fetal bovine serum, the cell count was adjusted to 1.0x105 cells/ml. 100 µL of the diluted cell suspension (approximately 10,000 cells/well) was added to each well of a 96 well flat bottom microtitre plate. After 24 hr, when the cell population was found adequate, the cells were centrifuged, and the pellets were suspended with 100 µL of Dexamethasone niosome (12.5, 25, 50, and 100 µg/ml) and the drug solution (12.5, 25, 50, and 100 µg/ml) prepared in maintenance media. The plates were then incubated at 37°C for 48 hr in a 5% CO2 environment, with microscopic examination and observations recorded every 24 hr. After 48 hr, 20 µL of MTT (2 mg/ml) in MEM-PR (MEM without phenol red) was added. The plates were gently shaken and incubated for 2 hr at 37˚C. The 100 µL of DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide) was added and the plates were gently shaken to solubilize the formed formazan. The absorbance was measured using a microplate reader at a wavelength of 540 nm after 3 days [13].
2.6.6 Cell permeation studies
The effect of permeation of Dexamethasone niosome and the drug solution were studied on the Caco-2 cell monolayer. Caco-2 cells are widely used as an in vitro model for predicting human drug absorption and prediction of intestinal permeability [14]. Caco-2 cells are generated from a human colorectal cancer and spontaneously differentiate into polarised entrecote monolayers when grown. Before the experiment, the cells were seeded on multiwall-insert plates and allowed to form a confluent monolayer for a period of 20 days. On day 20, the test compound (Dexamethasone niosome-50 μg/ml, 100 μg/ml and the drug solution-50 μg/ml,100 μg/ml) were added to the apical side of the membrane and the permeability coefficient (Papp) of the compound across the monolayer is monitored over 2 hr. The barrier integrity of the Caco-2 cell was ensured by TEER (Transepithelial electrical resistance) measurement using EVOM (Epithelial volt-ohm meter) machine using the following equation:
R Tissue(Ω) = R Total - R Blank
TEER = R Tissue(Ω) × M Area(cm2)
2.7 Loading of optimized Dexamethasone niosomal suspension into a gel
The gel (1%) was prepared by dissolving 1000 mg of carbopol 934 in 88 ml of distilled water, then add 5 ml of glycerol and stir the mixture with a magnetic stirrer until thickening occurred. The suspension was added to the gel base at a concentration of 4 mg/gm, and then neutralised with triethanolamine until a translucent gel appeared [15].
2.8 Evaluation of gel
2.8.1 Physical appearance
The physical appearance of the gel was observed by visual inspection.
2.8.2 Viscosity
Brookfield Viscometer (MIDDLEBORO, MA 02346, U.S.A) was used to determine the viscosity of the niosomal gel. Accurately 50 gm of gel was taken into a beaker and the spindle was dipped into the gel, viscosity of the gel was measured by rotating the spindle (s64) at 5 rpm [16].
2.8.3 pH
A digital meter was used to measure the pH of the gel. About 1 gm of the gel was dispersed in 25 ml of distilled water and set aside for 1 hr. In a beaker, the electrode of a pH meter (SYSTRONICS pH system 361, Ahmedabad) was placed and measured.
2.8.4 Spreadability and Extrudability
The spreadability and extrudability of the gel were analyzed by using Texture Analyzer (TAXT.Plus, Stable Microsystems, U.K).
2.8.5 Ex vivo permeation studies
The skin of a goat's ear was obtained from a slaughterhouse [17]. The extra hair was trimmed using scissors and washed with cold water. The skin was then soaked in saline phosphate buffer pH 7.4 for 12-18 hr. The prepared goat ear skin was tied to one end of an open-ended glass cylinder with a diameter of 1.25 cm so that the stratum corneum of the skin would place above the saline buffer. The skin was applied with a 4 mg equivalent amount of the Dexamethasone niosome. The cylinder was then placed in a 250 ml beaker containing 100 ml of saline phosphate buffer pH 7.4, which would serve as a receptor compartment. At 37°C, the medium was agitated using a magnetic stirrer at 40 rpm. 5 ml of aliquots were taken until 6 hr and the sink conditions was maintained by replacing the same volume of buffer. The withdrawn sample were analyzed by UV spectroscopy at 241 nm. The same procedure was carried out for the drug solution. Steady-state flux (Jss) was calculated from the slope of the linear regression line. The apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) was calculated according to the following equation:
Papp = JSS/C₀
where C₀ is the initial drug concentration.
2.9 Drug release kinetics
The zero order, first order, higuchi, and korsmeyer-Peppas equation models were used to analyse in vitro drug release data using the DD solver excel programme
2.10 Stability studies
According to ICH guidelines, the stability studies for niosomal formulation was performed. The formulation was kept for 3 months at room(ambient) temperature (25°C-27°C) and in the refrigerator (3°C-5°C). The appearance, particle size, and zeta potential were examined.
2.11 Statistical Analysis of Data
The particle size, entrapment efficiency, and in vitro release data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA (one-way analysis of variance) using GraphPad Prism 9 software (Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). The value were considered to be significant if the P value <0.05.