A. Single ESPAR antenna
An electronically steerable parasitic array radiator (ESPAR) antenna consists of one active element (fed element or radiator) and the others are the parasitic elements (or parasitic radiators) attached with variable reactance. The proposed ESPAR antenna is designed using the CST studio simulator. The active monopole (numbered as #0) placed in the center of the metal ground plane surrounded by 4- parasitic elements (numbered as #1- #4) printed on Rogers RO4725-JXR dielectric substrate. Its relative permittivity, \({\epsilon }_{r}\)= 2.55 and thickness, h = 0.787 mm. To design a low-profile ESPAR antenna, it has to significantly be reduced the height. The original concepts while its radiation patterns can successfully be used to provide accurate direction of arrival estimation, a number of constructions based on the number of radiators have been investigated. The distance between an active element and the passive elements is λ/4 (= a). The active monopole here is fed by the coaxial connector via the central pin in order to provide 50Ω impedance appropriately and its height, ha = 26 mm. The parasitic elements can be opened (directors that pass through the electromagnetic wave) or shortened (reflectors that reflects the energy) to the ground by the pin diode switching circuits designed on dielectric substrate whose height, hp = 27.2 mm. The central pin of every surrounding passive element can be connected to the ground via a corresponding switching circuit realized using inductance and reactance sets. The switching mechanism influences the passive elements resonance by involving additional, centrally located load (close to open or short circuit). As a consequence, the proposed 5- elements antenna provides \({360}^{0}\) beam steering with each \({45}^{0}\) discrete step using n = 8 directional radiation patterns. In such setup, nth radiation pattern will have its main beam direction equal to \({\phi }_{max}^{n}\)for which the radiation pattern will have its maximum in the horizontal plane. All considered steering vectors together with associated main beam directions and radiation pattern numbers, n are gathered in table II.
The 3-D radiation pattern of the proposed antenna at all the switching state is illustrated in Fig. 3. By which the antenna will definitely provide the strength connectivity in any networks even though there is a difference in height of installed nodes. Also, the antenna provides standard gain values which are sufficient to be used in weather tracking, WSN system; IoT- based smart city deployments, and so on. Moreover, the impedance matching of the proposed antenna is very good as depicted in Fig. 4, for the first switching state. The reflection coefficient below − 10 dB in the considered frequency band of the antenna is presented. The minimum return loss exhibits as -24.90 dB with a bandwidth of 270 MHz, from where; it could observe that the antenna exactly resonates at 2.49 GHz frequency.
Comparative analysis results with some other published ESPAR antenna papers are demonstrated in Table III, based on the radius, r (mm) of the substrate, maximum height of the antenna elements, h (mm), resonating frequency (GHz), maximum gain (dB), and the value of return loss |S1,1| (dB) of the antenna.
However, the proposed ESPAR antenna has maximum gain of 8.17 dB, minimum value of return loss is -24.90 dB, and the optimum operating bandwidth is 270 MHz with the least side lobe. As compared to the many ESPAR antennas, its size, heights are smaller; also the characteristics parameters exhibit very well in result that is why this might be selected to be used in the respective communication system.
The proposed antenna’s gain during the angular directions of \({0}^{0}\) is 8.17 dB whereas the gain at the time of main lobe angular directions of \({90}^{0}\), \({180}^{0}\), and \(27{0}^{0}\) is 8.12 dB, also the gain 7.88 dB obtained at \({45}^{0}\), \({135}^{0}\), \(2{25}^{0}\), and \(31{5}^{0}\). It happens due to the reactance set of the antenna at different passive elements.
B. 1x2 array of ESPAR antenna
In 1x2 array of 5- elements ESPAR antenna, each ESPAR antenna is arranged in such a way that the distance between the two antennas is about one-eight wavelength, λ/8 to be operated in the ISM band frequency of (2.40–2.50) GHz. The simulation and geometrical design specification of the 1x2 array antenna is illustrated in Fig. 5 with two single 5- elements ESPAR antennas. The lumped ports of the two ESPAR antennas are setup in different way as depicted in Fig. 5(a).
During the first steering vextor in accordance with table IV, the return loss plot of the array antenna is demonstrated in Fig. 6, more specifically the reflection coefficients for S1,1, S2,2, of the 1x2 array 5- elements ESPAR antenna is shown in Fig. 6(a). The S1,1 and S2,2 curves minimum return loss exhibited as – 18 dB. Moreover, the S2,1 and S2,2 curves return loss present below the – 16 dB as illuminated in Fig. 6(b). After combining the farfield results, the final reflection coefficient is displayed in Fig. 6(d), which indicates that the array antenna resonates at 2.46 GHz frequency with minimum return loss of – 21.50 dB. At the time of second steering of the reactance set presented in table IV, the reflection coefficient is shown in Fig. 7. The S2,1 and S2,2 return loss curves present below the – 25 dB as illustarted in Fig. 7(b), and the Fig. 7(c) is presented as the combined result. Again, when the \({\phi }_{max}^{3}\) = \({90}^{0}\) folowed by the reactamce set of table IV, the reflection coefficient is depicted in Fig. 8. For the other beam directions, the return loss plot of the proposed array antenna maintain the same result followed by the reactance set table.
The complete 3-D radiation pattern of the proposed 1x2 array antenna is displayed in Fig. 9 by following the directions of \({0}^{0}\), \({45}^{0}\), \({90}^{0}\), \({135}^{0}\), \({180}^{0}\), \({225}^{0}\), \({270}^{0}\), and \({315}^{0}\). It’s observed that the peak gain of the proposed antenna is 11.40 dB and the least gain of the array antenna is 9.95 dB.
It is obtained from the presented table V, that the designed array antenna is compared with some published once papers based on the type array of antenna, array dimensions (nxm), operating frequency (GHz), and gain (dB).