This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
Research
Fumiyuki Goto
Department of Otolaryngology, Tokai university, kanagawa, Japan
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background
It is not yet clarified the effect of vestibular rehabilitation on patients with vestibular migraine (VM) .
Aims/Objectives
In this study, we aimed to compare the effect of vestibular rehabilitation on patients with VM and those in the chronic stage of vestibular neuritis (VN).
Material and Methods
A total of 26 patients with VM and 31 patients in the chronic stage of VN who were treated. All patients underwent an in-hospitalized vestibular rehabilitation program. A variety of data including the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), POMS, and posturography were compared.
Results
Before treatment, there was no significant difference in the parameters between the two groups, except for a higher confusion score of Profile of Mood States (POMS) in the VM group. In both groups, the DHI score significantly improved. In the VM group, the confusion score of POMS, physical component score (PCS) of SF-8, and some parameters in posturography significantly improved. In the VN group, anxiety, depression, and PCS of SF-8 significantly improved.
Conclusions and Significance
The higher confusion score of POMS in patients with VM reflects the known increased comorbidity risk of psychiatric disorders. In both groups, in-hospitalized vestibular rehabilitation was effective in alleviating the subjective and objective parameters of vestibular symptoms within a month.
Keywords
vestibular migraine (VM), Profile of Mood States (POMS), physical component score (PCS)
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 18 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Psychology
Learn more about our company.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research
Fumiyuki Goto
Department of Otolaryngology, Tokai university, kanagawa, Japan
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 18 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Psychology
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background
It is not yet clarified the effect of vestibular rehabilitation on patients with vestibular migraine (VM) .
Aims/Objectives
In this study, we aimed to compare the effect of vestibular rehabilitation on patients with VM and those in the chronic stage of vestibular neuritis (VN).
Material and Methods
A total of 26 patients with VM and 31 patients in the chronic stage of VN who were treated. All patients underwent an in-hospitalized vestibular rehabilitation program. A variety of data including the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), POMS, and posturography were compared.
Results
Before treatment, there was no significant difference in the parameters between the two groups, except for a higher confusion score of Profile of Mood States (POMS) in the VM group. In both groups, the DHI score significantly improved. In the VM group, the confusion score of POMS, physical component score (PCS) of SF-8, and some parameters in posturography significantly improved. In the VN group, anxiety, depression, and PCS of SF-8 significantly improved.
Conclusions and Significance
The higher confusion score of POMS in patients with VM reflects the known increased comorbidity risk of psychiatric disorders. In both groups, in-hospitalized vestibular rehabilitation was effective in alleviating the subjective and objective parameters of vestibular symptoms within a month.
Loading...