5.1 Difference in climatic settings of Ohtaki and Maboroshi Caves
A major difference between the climatic settings of Ohtaki Cave (Nagataki) and Maboroshi Cave (Yuki) is a seasonal bias of precipitation amount. In Nagataki, precipitation during the three winter months (December–February) accounts for 16.8% of annual precipitation and yearly variations in winter precipitation are far larger than those in Yuki (Figs. 2c and d). Consequently, the amount ratio of winter and annual precipitation is an important factor controlling the annual average δ18OMW values at Ohtaki Cave. On the other hand, in Yuki (near Maboroshi Cave), precipitation during the coldest 3 months (December–February) is limited to only 10% of the annual total and the yearly variation is also very limited in these months (Fig. 2d). The precipitation during the warmer 7 months (April–October) accounts for 78% of the annual total, which is more than three times the precipitation in the other 5 months (November–March; 22%). In the region of Maboroshi Cave, the Chugoku Mountains (1729 m asl) obstruct the winter rain/snowfall from the Japan Sea side. It is therefore estimated that the amount ratio of winter and annual precipitation has less importance for the annual average δ18OMW values at Maboroshi Cave.
The depths of surrounding seas caused another difference in hydrological settings in a millennial scale. The SIS (Fig. 1b) is currently shallow (mostly < 50 m deep) and is an important vapor source for Maboroshi Cave in Hiroshima. However, the SIS was almost exposed during the glacial sea-level low. Because of the absence of this inland sea, moisture was predominantly transported over longer distances from the marine vapor source. Higher δ18OMW from the SIS was established by the Holocene glacial retreat (Kato et al., 2021). By contrast, the influence of the SIS is negligible for Ohtaki Cave in Gifu prefecture (Fig. 1b).
5.2 Discrimination of KIEs and temperature calibration for OT02 Δ47 values
Before paleoclimatic reconstruction, we inspected the reliability of our results as paleoclimatic records. In principle, both calcite δ18O and Δ47 values depend on temperature; nevertheless, this temperature dependency can be complicated by the KIE due to CO2 degassing from the parent water. It has been suggested that CO2 degassing elevates δ18O values and lowers Δ47 values of carbonate minerals by incomplete isotopic exchange among water and DIC species (Guo, 2008; Daëron et al., 2011; Kluge and Affek, 2012; Guo and Zhou, 2019) and can generate isotopic offsets (differences between actual and equilibrium values). Some speleothems show a negative correlation between δ18O offset and Δ47 offset due to the KIE (Daëron et al., 2011; Wainer et al., 2011; Kluge and Affek, 2012; Kluge et al., 2013; Affek et al., 2014). This type of covariation (negative correlation) between δ18O and Δ47 offsets develops when KIE fractionation significantly affects δ18O and Δ47. In such cases, Δ47 temperature is unusable for paleoclimatic reconstruction.
We examined the covariation between Δ18OOT02 and Δ47 values of the OT02 stalagmite to distinguish the influence from KIE. In the OT02 stalagmite, a weak but positive covariation between Δ18OOT02−SW and Δ47 values expected for equilibrium conditions was noted throughout (Fig. 5a, r = 0.36, n = 78, p < 0.01).
Δ18OOT02−SW = 5.05 Δ47 − 11.15 (n = 78, R2 = 0.132, p < 0.01). (7)
The weak correlation can be due to short-term variations in δ18OMW and KIE strength, and large errors of ± 0.006‰–0.009‰ for Δ47. However, the positive relationship supports the hypothesis that temperature and temperature-dependent changes are the principal factors controlling both the overall trends of Δ47 and Δ18OOT02−SW, and that the signals (Δ47, δ18OOT02, and Δ18OOT02−SW) are not distubed by changes in the strength of KIE disequilibrium.
For the purpose of comparison, in the case of the Hiro-1 stalagmite, the positive covariation was found also in most parts of the stalagmite, supporting the interpretation that both Δ47 and δ18OHiro−1 changed mainly as a function of temperature (Kato et al., 2021). However, several layers of low growth rate and high δ13C in Hiro-1 which imply dry conditions and high prior calcite precipitation (PCP) (Hori et al., 2013) exhibited features of the strong influence of KIE disequilibrium: higher δ18O values and small Δ47 values. In these layers of the Hiro-1 stalagmite, according to our estimate (Kato et al., 2021), the significantly large PCP associated with dry conditions in Maboroshi Cave likely caused lower Δ63 (similar to Δ47, abundance anomaly of 63CO32−) of drip water DIC and lower Δ47 of the Hiro-1 stalagmite, and the KIE was likely further induced by rapid supersaturation and precipitation in the evaporating water film, in which both δ18O and δ13C increased (Kato et al., 2021).
The growth rate of the OT02 stalagmite is higher and more stable (around 1–4 µm/yr in the latest Pleistocene portion and 8–9 µm/yr in the Holocene portion) than that of the Hiro-1 stalagmite (less than 0.3 µm/yr in HS1 and up to 3–4 µm/yr in 6.0–6.5 and 16.5–17.0ka; Hori et al., 2013; Kato et al., 2021). Additionally, subsamples for Δ47 measurements were collected from clear layers of OT02 excluding opaque/muddy horizons to avoid the effect of KIE as much as possible, as mentioned in Section 3.1.1. This is likely the reason for absence of strong KIE disequilibrium in the OT02 stalagmite. Therefore, we deduce that temperature is the dominant control on the OT02 Δ47 record and that the relationship is consistent throughout the growth of OT02 from the latest Pleistocene to the middle Holocene. Further, the average Δ47 temperature during the Holocene, except for the Hypsithermal warm period (14.1°C ± 4.1°C), is extremely similar to the current cave temperature of 13.0°C. Therefore, the temperature reconstruction using tufa calibration (Eq. 1; Kato et al., 2019) appears to be successful; as previously described, another calibration by synthetic calcites in Kato et al. (2019) yields about 4°C higher temperatures from the same Δ47 values (Kato et al., 2019).
5.3 Terrestrial paleotemperature
We interpret temperature to be the dominant and consistent control on the OT02 Δ47 record, on the basis of the discussion presented in Section 5.2. The Δ47 temperature record from OT02 (Table 1) is also broadly consistent with known climatic stages, such as cooling during HS6 and cooling around HS5.2, warming during the Holocene, and a warming peak around the Hypsithermal event (9 to 6–5 ka; Wanner et al., 2008), although the cooling in HS5 is not so significant comparing to HS6 and HS5.2 and Δ47 temperature show large scatter during HS4 and the warming peak of the Hypthithermal (Fig. 4c). In the period common to the OT02 and Hiro-1 stalagmites (7.7–4.5 ka), the two stalagmites exhibit very similar patterns in Δ47 temperature (Figs. 4c and d); a rapid warming in 7.0–6.0 ka after a temporal cooling of about 5°C at 7.0 ka from around 15°C at 8.0–7.5 ka and a gradual cooling to the cessation of stalagmite growth. Notably, the data plots of OT02 were calibrated to the age of Hiro-1 by the shapes of Δ47 fluctuations with red vertical bars in Fig. 4, considering the larger dating error for OT02 aforementioned. For the same reason, H5.2 cooling is thought to be responsible for the comparatively low Δ47 temperatures observed around 54.8–54.1 ka of OT02 U-Th age. Thus, three distinct and venial cooling intervals of 3°C–5°C are likely linked to HS6, HS5.2, and HS5 (Fig. 4c). Although the averaged Δ47 temperature of the latest Pleistocene portion of OT02 (63–35 ka) is lower than that of the Holocene portion, the Δ47 temperature in warm periods between each Heinrich stadial reached 10°C–15°C, which is as high as the present temperature and the average of the Holocene.
Our Δ47 temperature equation (Eq. 1) was calibrated using the Δ47 values of natural tufa deposited at 5.6°C–16.0°C. The high Δ47 temperatures over 20°C around 5.4–2.9 ka therefore somewhat deviate from the temperature range covered by Eq. 1. Because of the nature of carbonate clumped isotope thermometry, the uncertainty of Δ47 temperatures is greater at higher temperatures, because the Δ47 value exhibits an inverse proportionality to the square of the temperature in Kelvins. Even after considering these larger errors and uncertainties, the average temperature during the period from 5.4 to 3.8 ka (considering the larger dating error for OT02 mentioned above, which likely corresponds to the warm maximum of 6.3–4.9 ka recorded in Hiro-1) is 19.9°C ± 6.0°C and is clearly higher than the present cave temperature of 13°C.
Seasonal temperature variation is currently very limited in the deeper part of Ohtaki Cave, and it is thus likely that the past cave temperature was also stable on seasonal timescales. The high-average Δ47 temperature during the Hypsithermal does not necessarily mean uniform warming of all seasons. In Nagataki (near Ohtaki Cave), the temperature variation tends to be largest in the colder season (November–April) and smaller in the warmer season (May–October; Fig. 6a). The correlation coefficient (R) of annual and monthly temperatures is large in February–May and September–October and smallest in the warmest months (July–August; Fig. 6a). Together, this indicates that summer temperature is not an important control in the determination of annual average temperatures. Variability in annual average temperature is largely dependent on temperature variability in spring and autumn and is also somewhat dependent on winter temperature. Though the assumption cannot be proven by our stalagmite records, we raise the possibility that the annual average temperature in Nagataki is characterized by the length of the summer (warmer interval) and the winter (colder interval). We presume that the higher cave temperature of 19.9°C ± 6.0°C observed in the 5.4–3.8 ka period of OT02 (corresponding 6.3–4.9 ka of Hiro-1) was induced by longer high summers and shorter winters than at present, accompanied by the warm climate optimum of the Hypsithermal event.
5.4 Features in the correlation between Δ47 versus Δ18OOT02−SW
A unified regression of Δ47 versus Δ18OOT02−SW was obtained for the OT02 stalagmite from the latest Pleistocene through the middle Holocene (Eq. 7). However, the slope of 5.05 is significantly shallower than that of the theoretical relationship. Where both stalagmite δ18OC and Δ47 are solely controlled by depositional temperature (in other words, assuming a constant drip water δ18OW), the relationship between δ18OC and Δ47 can be theoretically calculated. We applied the temperature dependency of Δ47 (Eq. 1) and δ18O (Eq. 4; Tremaine et al., 2011). The theoretical relationship between Δ47 and Δ18Ostalagmtie−SW is almost linear, with a slope around 70, but is slightly dependent on the Δ47 value (i.e., temperature) (72.5 at Δ47 = 0.69, 68.5 at Δ47 = 0.74).
The temperature dependency of meteoric water δ18OMW was viewed as a possible cause for the shallower slope. The apparent positive links between local surface air temperature and the meteoric δ18OMW have been reported globally (Dansgaard, 1964; Rozanski et al., 1993). This relationship can be explained using the renowned Craig-Gordon-type model of isotopic fractionation during water evaporation and the Rayleigh-type fractionation model during water condensation. It appears reasonable that δ18OMW would be higher in a temperate climate. To evaluate this interpretation, we defined the temperature-dependent fractionation from seawater to meteoric water as FTSW−MW (in ‰) and expressed the relationships between Δ47 and Δ18OC (OT02 or Hiro−1)−SW as shown in Equations 8 and 9:
f(Δ47) = AΔ47 + B = Δ18OC (OT02 or Hiro−1)−SW − FTSW−MW (8)
dFTSW−MW/dT = − aFTSW−MW = − aT + b, (9)
where T is the temperature in °C and FTSW−MW is assumed to be a linear function of temperature. The temperature-dependent coefficient of FTSW−MW is expressed by a (‰/°C). The slope A in Eq. 8 increases with the a of Eq. 9 and reaches a theoretical slope of Δ47 versus Δ18Ostalagmtie−SW (approximately 70) when a takes an appropriate value. In the OT02 stalagmite, Slope A reaches the theoretical slope (approximately 70) when aOT02 is at 0.18‰/°C for both the Holocene and latest Pleistocene (red line for the Holocene and blue line for the latest Pleistocene).
In the case of the Hiro-1 stalagmite, different regressions of Δ47 versus Δ18OHiro−1−SW were obtained from three discrete periods, 18.0–16.0, 14.2–12.6, and 7.7–4.9 ka (Fig. 5a, Kato et al., 2021). An especially large difference was noted between regressions in the pre-Holocene and mid-Holocene. Kato et al. (2021) explained this discrepancy in regressions by differences in meteoric water δ18OMW (Δ18OMW−SW) due to the presence or absence of the SIS (Fig. 1b), which is an important vapor source for Maboroshi Cave in Hiroshima. Higher δ18OMW from the SIS was established by the Holocene glacial retreat (Kato et al., 2021). By contrast, the influence of the SIS is negligible for Ohtaki Cave in Gifu prefecture (Fig. 1b). This is likely the reason for the unified regression between Δ47 and Δ18OOT02−SW (Eq. 7) for Ohtaki Cave (Fig. 5a).
There is another characteristic in the regression slopes of Hiro-1 Δ47 versus Δ18OHiro−1−SW compared to OT02 values. The regression slopes of Hiro-1 are approximately 40 (37.71–44.15; Kato et al., 2021), which are steeper than those of the OT02 stalagmite (Fig. 5a). Figure 5b also shows the calculation results of aHiro−1 (black lines in Fig. 5b; Kato et al., 2021). The differences in these slopes are thought to be the result of distinct temperature dependencies of meteoric δ18OMW between these two cave sites. In the Hiro-1 stalagmite, Slope A in Eq. 8 reaches the theoretical slope when aHiro−1 is at 0.077‰–0.098‰/°C (black lines in Fig. 5b; Kato et al., 2021), which is smaller than aOT02.
5.5 Reason for the larger temperature-dependent coefficient of FTSW−MW (a) in OT02
We assume that the divergence in a values for OT02 and Hiro-1 are ascribed to regional differences in precipitation characteristics. As described in Section 2.3, in both Nagataki (near Ohtaki Cave; Fig. 2c) and Yuki (near Maboroshi Cave; Fig. 2d), higher δ18OMW values are observed during the warm season, whereas lower δ18OMW values are observed in the cold season. However, in Nagataki, winter precipitation accounts for a larger proportion of the annual total, and the yearly variation of winter precipitation is far larger than in Yuki (Figs. 2a and b). Hence, the amount ratio of winter/annual precipitations is an important factor influencing the annual average δ18OMW values at Ohtaki Cave.
The major control of winter precipitation from the Japan Sea side is the strength of the EAWM. Hirose and Fukudome (2006) found a significant correlation (R2 = 0.85) between the average winter precipitation on the Japan Sea side of Honshu and Hokkaido islands in 1907–2006 and the winter monsoon index of Hanawa et al. (1988), which reflects differences in the sea-level pressures between Irkutsk and Nemuro in winter and represents the strength of the EAWM. Hirose and Fukudome (2006) also found that the Japan Sea SST in winter (November–January) exhibited a significant correlation with winter precipitation on the Japan Sea side (R2 = 0.82). This relation occurs because the high SST of the Japan Sea increases evaporation from seawater, which is the supply source of winter snow/rainfall to Japan. In the Northwest Pacific and East Asia, the land–sea thermal contrast is a driving force behind both the EASM and EAWM. As described above, the proportion of winter/summer precipitation is more variable in the Ohtaki region and the proportion is largely dependent on winter precipitation. Cooling of the land area results in increased winter precipitation and decreased annual average δ18OMW values in Ohtaki. This is likely the reason for the apparently larger temperature dependency of meteoric water δ18OMW (a; ‰/°C) in the Ohtaki region.
5.6 Paleoprecipitation history
In Section 5.3, we raised an assumption that the changes in cave temperature were arising from interactions between the summer and winter seasons. In Japan, summer and winter climates are characterized by the EASM and EAWM winds, respectively (Fukui, 1977). Generally in the Pacific side of Japan except for south-west islands, winter rain/snowfall has a δ18OMW value lower than summer rainfall with two peaks of δ18OMW in spring and autumn (Tanoue et al., 2013). This pattern was also observed in Nagataki and typically in Yuki (Figs. 2c and d). Changes in summer and winter durations might therefore affect the precipitation balance between summer and winter which are intimately connected to EASM and EAWM winds, and consequently determine the annual average of δ18OMW value. Based on this assumption, paleometeoric water should have a lower δ18OMW value in colder periods and a higher δ18OMW value in warmer periods. However, the relation between EASM and EAWM is not simple. Previous paleoclimatic studies have indicated numerous relationships between the intensities of EASM and EAWM: an inverse correlation (Xiao et al., 1995; Yancheva et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2009), a positive correlation (Zhang and Lu, 2007), and both positive and inverse correlations depending on the period and timescale concerned (Steinke et al., 2011; Ge et al., 2017). Recently, Yan et al. (2020) presented simulation results to investigate the relationship between time series changes in EASM and EAWM, showing that their intensities are positively correlated at orbital timescale due to seasonal insolation forcing but are negatively correlated over multidecadal to millennial timescales, primarily as a result of internal variability in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation and its subsequent teleconnection to East Asia via land–sea thermal contrasts.
Focusing on climatic changes at the centennial–millennial timescale, i.e., HSs and Hypsithermal warming, the result of our meteoric water δ18OMW reconstruction is consistent with the assumption of a lower (higher) δ18OMW value in colder (warmer) periods (Fig. 4e). The Δ18OMW−SW value (and accordingly the δ18OMW value) was lower in colder periods such as HSs and the period of cooling around 7 ka and higher in warmer periods. This is consistent with the assumption in Section 5.3 that the longer summer durations and higher amounts of EASM rainfall caused the average δ18OMW value in the Hypsithermal warm period. By contrast, it is presumed that EAWM brought a higher amount of snow and rainfall during long winters to Ohtaki Cave during HSs. The Hypsithermal (also known as the Holocene climatic optimum) is a warming period in northern mid to high latitudes (Wanner et al., 2008) that was commonly defined by the peak of EASM rainfall in Chinese continental regions (An et al., 2000). In Chinese continental regions, Heinrich stadials (HSs1–6) were involved in the EAM changes, the weak EASM, and the strong EAWM (Porter and An, 1995; Wang et al., 2001; Song et al., 2018). In comparison with the results from Chinese continental regions, our estimation results of higher amounts of EASM rainfall in the Hypsithermal warm period and higher amounts of EAWM snow/rainfall during HSs in the Ohtaki region appear credible. Although our results are based on changes in EASM/EAWM durations rather than their strengths, it is realistic to believe that the duration and strength of EASM/EAWM are positively related. The strong and/or long-lasting EAWM in Heinrich stadial results in a dry winter in Chinese continental regions (Porter and An, 1995; Wang et al., 2001; Song et al., 2018). However, EAWM is an important moisture source for Japan in the winter. We presume that the strong and/or long-lasting EAWM would result in a wet winter in the Japan Sea side in HSs. However, only a few prior investigations from Japan have reported terrestrial climatic records in HSs. Nakamura et al. (2013) performed stratigraphic analyses of acoustic records of sediments in Lake Nojiri, the Japan Sea side of central Japan (Fig. 1b) where winter snowfall accounts for approximately 30% of annual precipitation. They revealed lake level fluctuation during the past 45,000 years and found eight sets of rising and falling levels, although their results contain large dating errors of ± 1,000–15,000 years. They also found that peaks of lake level corresponded to cold climate stages such as HSs1–4 and the Younger Dryas. They presumed that lake level rises were caused by increased snowfall from an enhanced winter monsoon (EAWM). Light blue vertical bands in Fig. 4 indicate the periods of peak lake level in Nojiri identified by Nakamura et al. (2013). Unfortunately, the record of Nakamura et al. (2013) does not include older HSs5–6, for which particularly low Δ18OMW−SW values were reconstructed from OT02 (Fig. 4e). However, the durations of high lake level periods in Nojiri seem to correspond to the periods of colder temperature and lower Δ18OMW−SW values. Increased precipitation from EAWM was likely also bought into the Ohtaki region and caused a decrease in the annual average of Δ18OMW−SW during these cold stages.
As described here, changes in the amount ratio of summer and winter precipitations from EASM and EAWM caused the divergence in Δ18OMW−SW values in the Ohtaki region, although the temperature dependency of the fractionation between seawater and meteoric water (as discussed in Section 5.5) also accounts for the relationship between temperature and Δ18OMW−SW. The relation that lower/higher meteoric δ18OMW in warmer/colder climate stages is the opposite to the conventional assumption that meteoric δ18OMW becomes lower/higher in warm–humid/cold–dry climates due to the so-called “amount effect.”
As described in Section 5.1, precipitation from EAWM is minor in the region of Maboroshi Cave. We suggest that a strong EAWM and weak EASM during cold periods caused the dry conditions of Maboroshi Cave, which might have resulted in the interruptions of the growth of Hiro-1 and KIE disturbance of Hiro-1 records (Figs. 4b and d).