DLBCL is a complex and heterogeneous disease and age is an independent adverse prognostic factor. Very elderly patients older than 80 years have a worse prognosis. Grim prognosis in older patients are likely various reasons, which is related to its molecular mechanism, comorbidities, reduced treatment intensity and treatment-related toxicity. It is currently recognized that unfavorable genetic characteristics such as ABC subtypes, increased BCL2 expression, and high genome complexity were significantly associated with patient’s age[5].
In order to prolong the survival of elderly DLBCL patients, researchers have made many explorations for a good balance between effectiveness and tolerability. Research has demonstrated that reduced-dose regimens can provide a better balance of benefit and risk for very elderly patients. In a prospective study by Peyrade et al. used R-miniCHOP regimen, a subgroup of 149 patients older than 80 years was analyzed for efficacy and toxicity, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 47% and overall survival (OS) was 59%, and most side-effect was haematological toxicity (grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 59 patients, febrile neutropenia occurred in 11 patients)[6]. Similarly, Wen-Hao Zhang et al. reported that a retrospective study of 31 patients with a median age of 79 years, treated with reduced-dose REPOCH (rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) regimen, the complete remission rate (CR) was 71.0%, 3-year OS and PFS were 62.8% and 60.3%, respectively, treatment-related toxicities were generally tolerated and acceptable[7]. Another way to improve the tolerance of chemotherapy is called "pre-phase treatment", which refers to the application of vincristine and prednisone for 7 days before first chemoimmunotherapy cycle. In the NHL-B2 study, the first chemotherapy cycle of treatment-related mortality was decreased from 5% to less than 2% after the introduction of pre-phase treatment[8]. Chelsea et al. explored incorporating consolidative radiation therapy (RT) to reduce overall chemotherapy drug exposure, they found age older than 80 years who with early-stage patients, 3 to 4 cycles of chemotherapy followed by RT of disease free survival (DFS), PFS, OS (P=0.78, P=0.654, P=0.852) were equivalent to chemotherapy alone and was associated with less toxic reaction, which suggested that RT following short chemotherapy may be a better choice for some early-stage elderly patients who could not tolerate standard course of chemotherapy[9]. A study from the Swedish Lymphoma Register showed that very elderly patients seem to benefit from rituximab-anthracycline-based treatment[10]. However, most of very elderly patients are associated with an increasing risk of coronary artery diseases, the use of potentially cardiotoxic drugs such as anthracycline-based chemotherapy may not tolerate. Doxorubicin could be replaced with mitoxantrone, etoposide, liposomal doxorubicin, gemcitabine. In addition, in order to better tailor therapeutic schemes for very elderly patients, a careful assessment is necessary. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is an effective strategy to identify elderly patients who can benefit from a curative approach by activity of daily living (ADL), instrumental activity of daily living (IADL), and comorbidities[11]. Merli et al. develop a simplified geriatric assessment (sGA) to assess physical condition and defines a new prognostic index (EPI)[12]. These evaluation methods have helped in the prediction of mortality and the choice of treatment.
In recent years, some of clinic trials incorporating novel targeted drug have been evaluated. Gini et al. reported that 24 patients with a media age of 83 who received R²regimen have shown preferential activity in patients with an ORR of 50%[13]. Ibrutinib, as the first novel and effective oral BTK inhibitor (BTK inhibitors, BTKi), has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. A randomized multicenter phase III trial comparing ibrutinib plus RCHOP with placebo plus RCHOP in 838 DLBCL patients. Ultimately, ibrutinib plus RCHOP improved event-free survival (EFS), PFS and OS with manageable safety in patients age younger than 60 years. Nonetheless, in patients older than 60 years, ibrutinib plus RCHOP worsened EFS, PFS and OS, increased serious adverse events[14]. It showed that ibrutinib plus standard RCHOP may not appropriate for elderly patients, but treatment value of ibrutinib combined with reduced-dose chemotherapy worth further studying. The SENIOR study evaluated Lenalidomide combination with R-miniCHOP chemotherapy. However, the addition of lenalidomide to R-miniCHOP did not improve OS while resulted in more adverse events[15]. Recently, Schmitz and colleagues develop a new classification of DLBCL: MCD, BN2, N1 and EZB[16]. The genetic subtypes of DLBCL differ significantly in response to standard immunochemotherapy, and may also differ in response to targeted therapies. It is expected heterogeneous groups classified by molecular genetic testing that can be targeted and may improve the curative effect.
Triple-hit lymphoma with MYC, BCL-2 and BCL-6 rearrangements has a dismal prognosis, which occurs mainly in the elderly, with advanced stage (III/IV), higher risk of extranodal disease including central nervous system (CNS) and bone marrow involvement, elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and higher International Prognostic Index (IPI) score[17]. R-CHOP is largely unsatisfactory, and patients may benefit from intensive treatment and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Unfortunately, the median OS of DHL/THL is only 5 to 18 months even after intensive chemotherapy and/or HSCT[18]. A largest series report in Europe about the treatment of DHL/THL showed PFS was obviously longer with intensive regimen (R-ACVBP, R-COPADE, DA-R-EPOCH) for advanced stage (III/IV) patients, whereas was not significantly associated with OS. In addition, there was no difference in PFS and OS between R-CHOP group and intensive chemotherapy group among older than 65 years patients[4]. CAR-T cell therapy may present another potentially therapeutic option for HGBL-DHL/THL patients. The ZUMA-1 trial evaluated axicabtagene ciloleucel, an autologous anti-CD19 CAR-T cell, with an objective response rate of 83%, CR of 58%, respectively, of the 7 patients were HGBL-DHL/THL, there was still a objective response of 90% and CR of 33% of them[19]. Additionally, the results of the ZUMA-1 study showed that CAR-T therapy was equally effective in elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years), with a ORR rate of 92%, a CR rate of 75%, and did not seem to be affected by age in efficacy and safety[20]. However, how to maintain long-term curative effect of CAR-T is still a problem that needs to be solved. Currently, the management of HGBL-DHL/THL still present a challenge and the best treatment regimen remains unknown. Therefore, novel and effective treatments should be given priority and clinical trials should be considered. The ongoing clinical trials are as follows: Polatuzumab Vedotin combination with R-CHP(NCT04479267). Venetoclax (ABT199) plus chemoimmunotherapy (R-CHOP, DA-EPOCH-R) (NCT03984448). DA-EPOCH-R induction followed by Nivolumab consolidation (NCT03620578). Acalabrutinib in combination with CAR-T(NCT04257578). Glofitamab or Mosunetuzumab in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Glofit-GemOx or Mosun-GemOx) (NCT04313608).