1. Williamson P: Core outcome sets will improve the quality of obstetrics research. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2014, 121(10):1196-1196.
2. Williamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Gargon E: Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core Outcomes. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2012, 17(1):1-2.
3. Williamson P, Clarke M: The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: its role in improving Cochrane Reviews[editorial]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, 4.
4. Heneghan C, Goldacre B, Mahtani KR: Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients. Trials 2017, 18:122.
5. COS Uptake [http://www.comet-initiative.org/cosuptake]
6. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, Clarke M, Gargon E, Gorst S, Harman N et al: The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials 2017, 18(3):280.
7. Kirkham JJ, Davis K, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Tunis S, Williamson PR: Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations. PLOS Medicine 2017, 14(11):e1002447.
8. Gorst SL, Gargon E, Clarke M, Blazeby JM, Altman DG, Williamson PR: Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey. PLoS ONE 2016, 11(1):e0146444.
9. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative (COMET) [http://www.comet-initiative.org/]
10. Biggane AM, Brading L, Ravaud P, Young B, Williamson PR: Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys. Trials 2018, 19:113.
11. Dalkey N: The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. In. www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_memoranda/2005/RM5888.pdf.: RAND Corporation; 1969.
12. Shah P, Hoeffner J: Review of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instruction. Educational Psychology Review 2002, 14(1):47-69.
13. Gaissmaier W, Wegwarth O, Skopec D, Muller AS, Broschinski S, Politi MC: Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information. Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 2012, 31(3):286-296.
14. Hall DA, Smith H, Heffernan E, Fackrell K, for the Core Outcome Measures in Tinnitus International Delphi Research Steering G: Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study. PLOS ONE 2018, 13(7):e0201378.
15. Turnbull AE, Dinglas VD, Friedman LA, Chessare CM, Sepúlveda KA, Bingham CO, Needham DM: A survey of Delphi panelists after core outcome set development revealed positive feedback and methods to facilitate panel member participation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2018, 102:99-106.
16. Bolle S, Romijn G, Smets EMA, Loos EF, Kunneman M, van Weert JCM: Older Cancer Patients’ User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016, 18(7):e208.
17. Fish R, Sanders C, Williamson PR, Renehan AG: Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer. BMJ Open 2017, 0(e018726.).
18. McNair AGK, Whistance RN, Forsythe RO, Macefield R, Rees J, Pullyblank AM, Avery KNL, Brookes ST, Thomas MG, Sylvester PA et al: Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study. PLOS Medicine 2016, 13(8):e1002071.
19. Brundage M, Blackford A, Tolbert E, Smith K, Bantug E, Snyder C, Aaronson NK, Ganz PA, Garg R, Fisch M et al: Presenting comparative study PRO results to clinicians and researchers: beyond the eye of the beholder. Quality of Life Research 2018, 27(1):75-90.
20. Bantug ET, Coles T, Smith KC, Snyder CF, Rouette J, Brundage MD: Graphical displays of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for use in clinical practice: What makes a pro picture worth a thousand words? Patient Education and Counseling 2016, 99:483-490.
21. Izard J, Hartzler A, Avery DI, Shih C, Dalkin BL, Gore JL: User-centered design of quality of life reports for clinical care of patients with prostate cancer. Surgery 2014, 155(5):789-796.
22. McNair AG, Brookes ST, Davis CR, Argyropoulos M, Blazeby JM: Communicating the results of randomized clinical trials: do patients understand multidimensional patient-reported outcomes? J Clin Oncol 2010, 28(5):738-743.
23. Smith KC, Brundage MD, Tolbert E, Little EA, Bantug ET, Snyder CF: Engaging stakeholders to improve presentation of patient-reported outcomes data in clinical practice. Support Care Cancer 2016, 24(10):4149-4157.