From the past few years, it was found that the economy of the developed countries had been shifted from agriculture to industry due to a huge increase in the world’s population (Zheng, Zhang, Meng, Wang, & Li, 2020). Although industrialization has provided ease in human life at the same time, it also cast a devastating impact on the environment by producing toxic and hazardous chemical species (Payra et al., 2019; Usman et al., 2021). Most of these industries discharge their toxic and stable chemical species into the wastewater, which ultimately damages aquatic life and human health (Lv et al., 2020; Steplin Paul Selvin et al., 2018). The wastewater contaminants are mostly organic dyes that are stable and toxic due to their complex and aromatic structures and are mostly waste-products of the tanneries, paint and textile industries (Ritika, Kaur, Umar, Mehta, & Kansal, 2019). Due to this stable nature, these organic pollutants are considered non-biodegradable. These pollutants cause serious environmental problems and human health issues, including skin and lungs destruction (Ashar et al., 2020; Das & Mahalingam, 2020). Many types of dyes, which are the most common organic pollutants, are produced in different industries and discharged into water bodies without proper treatment and are the major sources of water pollution (Ahmed et al., 2020; Chowdhury, Khan, Kumari, & Hussain, 2019; Khodadadi, Bordbar, & Nasrollahzadeh, 2017; Xu, Sun, Wang, Song, & Wang, 2018).
These water pollutants threaten human and aquatic life when discharged untreated into water bodies. These contaminants must be eradicated from the waste material before discharge into the water body. These contaminants are most commonly removed from wastewater by employing different methods. These methods include some electrochemical and physio-chemical techniques such as oxidation, chemical precipitation, adsorption, and microwave-assisted catalysis (Martínez-López et al., 2019; Mostafa, Elsawy, Darwish, Hussein, & Abdaleem, 2020; Ndagijimana, Liu, Li, Yu, & Wang, 2019; Tang et al., 2020). These methods are very important and advantageous to remove the organic compounds from water, but there are various disadvantages and drawbacks associated with these methods. Due to environmental issues caused by above-mentioned methods, there was a need to develop an effective and eco-friendly technique to treat the harmful organic material (Bibi et al., 2017). The photocatalysis served the requisite properties, non-toxic, cost-effective and commercially easy to handle (Ahmed et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2020). In this technique, a photocatalyst is used to degrade the harmful organic materials in the presence of sunlight (Demirci, Yurddaskal, Dikici, & Sarıoğlu, 2018; Raza et al., 2020). The active sites available on the surface of catalyst are responsible to absorb the sunlight and hence for the creation of active species to degrade harmful organic compounds (Gao et al., 2020; Kumar et al., 2020). For the last few years, metal oxide nanoparticles have been most commonly used as photocatalysts for the removal of toxic organic compounds from sewage water (Duan et al., 2020). These metallic nanoparticles have been fabricated by the use of different methods i.e., hydrothermal, sol-gel, co-precipitation and microwave-assisted techniques (Almeida, Rodembusch, Ferreira, & Caldas de Sousa, 2020; Dinesh, Pramod, & Chakma, 2020; Park & Ahn, 2020; Yousuf et al., 2019; Zare, Namratha, Thakur, & Byrappa, 2019; Zinatloo-Ajabshir, Salehi, & Salavati-Niasari, 2018). Although these fabrication methods are very effective and efficient for the production of nanoparticles, there are still some drawbacks of these methods, including high cost, requiring more energy, and producing harmful by-products (Liu et al., 2019; Rojas & Horcajada, 2020). It is required to choose a comparatively more effective, cheaper and least harmful technique for the fabrication of nanoparticles (Usman et al., 2019).
The solar light-sensitive metal oxide photocatalysts are very important for the decomposition of water pollutants. These metal oxides include CoO and CuO, which are light-sensitive (Lim, Chua, Lee, & Chi, 2014). Due to their variable oxidation state and active surface area, transition metal oxides have exhibited more vital activities. Iron oxide being transition metal oxide, have attained more consideration since the previous few years because of its outstanding uses in different fields. Iron oxides have been extensively used for photocatalysis (Bouhjar, Derbali, Marı´, & Bessaı's, 2020). The Fe2O3 is an effective and advantageous photocatalyst to oxidize H2O because of its environment-friendly potential. It absorbs a longer range of solar light, hence a more effective photocatalyst (W. Guo, Sun, Lv, Kong, & Wang, 2017). The photocatalytic activity of Fe2O3 nanoparticles has been found to be increased when treated with some other metals, more preferentially the transition metals. The Mn being cheaper, easily available, and environment-friendly properties, is the best transition metal used for doping of Fe2O3 nanoparticles (Chen et al., 2019). The doping of Fe2O3 with Mg also enhances the catalytic degradation of organic pollutants by generating more oxygen vacancies (Sun et al., 2020). The photocatalytic activity of Cr doped Fe2O3 nanorods was also found to be enhanced compared to undoped (Popov et al., 2021). The Ca doped Fe2O3 nanoparticles being cheaper and least harmful to the environment, were used preferably to degrade the RhB (an organic pollutant). The doping of Fe2O3 nanoparticles with Ca enhances electron transfer, so the degradation is increased by many folds (S. Guo et al., 2020). [email protected]2O3 nanoparticles have been fabricated by using sol-gel technique. Doping by Ti significantly enhanced the surface area of Fe2O3 nanoparticles. It also enhanced reducibility and catalytic activity in oxidation of toluene (Abbas Khaleel, Maliha Parvin, Moahmmed AlTabaji, & Al-zamly, 2018).
Co metal doping of Fe2O3 reduces its bandgap, and it also enhances photocatalytic activity because it acts as a trapping center for electrons. Co-doped Fe2O3 nano sized particles have shown a good photocatalytic performance to remove the hazardous industrial effluents (R. Suresh et al., 2017). Hydrothermally synthesized Mg-doped CuO/Fe2O3 was found to be a good catalyst for phenol degradation. The degradation rate of nanoparticles is enhanced by doping the material with Mg. This increase is due to the fact that OVs number is enhanced due to Mg doping in the catalysts (Mengying Sun, Yu Lei, Hao Cheng, Jianfeng Ma, Yong Qin, Yong Kong, et al., 2020). The chromium metal is used as dopant material because of its certain characteristic properties like ion donor and enhancement of charge carrier concentration in Fe2O3 sheets. Mainly the doping of Cr metal onto the iron oxide sheet enhances the conductance and charge transport in these sheets (Feriel Bouhjar, Lotfi Derbali, Bernabe Marı´a, & Bessaıs, 2020). The photocatalytic performance of CuS/Fe2O3/Mn2O3 nanomaterials was determined by the degradation of ciprofloxacin (CIP) (Yan Huang et al., 2020). By using the magnesium metal as dopant have also enhanced the photocatalytic activity of CuO/Fe2O3 to degrade the phenolic compounds (Mengying Sun, Yu Lei, Hao Cheng, Jianfeng Ma, Yong Qin, Kong, et al., 2020).
The doping with Cu enhanced its photoelectrochemical property. The co-doping further enhanced some characteristic properties of the Fe2O3. Co-doping of the Fe2O3 with Si and Ti has increased its donor concentration. The co-doping of Fe2O3 with N and Zn has enhanced its concentration of acceptors and photo response (Reddy et al., 2019). It is observed that the doping of nanoparticles with Mn imparts various tremendous characteristics to them. The enhancement of photocatalytic performance of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles was also observed by doping with Mn. This doping has enhanced the photo-induced charges which in turn increased the capacity of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles to transfer the charges (N. Wang, Han, Wen, Liu, & Li, 2019). The nanoparticles having Mn doping also undergo agglomeration due to their higher surface energy. The photocatalytic effect was found to be further enhanced by the use of rare-earth metal ions in addition to Mn. These rare-earth metals are responsible for the inhibition of photo-induced electron-hole recombination (Rashmi et al., 2017). These rare earths also enhance the number of active sites which are responsible to degrade the harmful organic compounds by the creation of heterojunctions in the nanoparticles, which ultimately inhibits the electron-hole recombination (Harish, Bhojya Naik, Prashanth kumar, & Viswanath, 2013). The rare-earth metals in combination with Mn are also responsible for changing the intrinsic properties of the nanoparticles due to the unique 4f-3d coupling of electrons. La is more preferable as compared to the other rare-earths due to its distinct properties such as larger size (1.6061 Å), simple electronic spectra, reactivity, paramagnetic nature, higher resistivity (615 Ωm) and lower melting point (920°C). La in combination with Mn have enhanced physical, chemical and catalytic properties of the nanoparticles (Baig et al., 2020; Peng, Fu, Yang, & Ouyang, 2016).
Because of these remarkable properties of cations of lanthanide series, in the present work, we have chosen La in combination with Mn for the co-doping of Fe2O3 nanoparticles to enhance the photocatalytic performance of these nanoparticles.