[1] Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Starke RM, et al. Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke. 2013. 44(8): 2150-4.
[2] Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013. 267(3): 858-68.
[3] Rinkel GJ, Djibuti M, Algra A, van Gijn J. Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke. 1998. 29(1): 251-6.
[4] MMJ C, Silveira L, Moore J, Pereira VM, Thomas AJ, Dmytriw AA. Flow diversion for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Mechanism and implications. Ann Neurol. 2019. 85(6): 793-800.
[5] Chalouhi N, Starke RM, Yang S, et al. Extending the indications of flow diversion to small, unruptured, saccular aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Stroke. 2014. 45(1): 54-8.
[6] Chalouhi N, Daou B, Barros G, et al. Matched Comparison of Flow Diversion and Coiling in Small, Noncomplex Intracranial Aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2017. 81(1): 92-97.
[7] Zhang X, Zhong J, Gao H, Xu F, Bambakidis NC. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the LVIS device: a systematic review. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017. 9(6): 553-557.
[8] Jankowitz BT, Gross BA, Seshadhri S, et al. Hemodynamic differences between Pipeline and coil-adjunctive intracranial stents. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019. 11(9): 908-911.
[9] Wang C, Tian Z, Liu J, et al. Flow diverter effect of LVIS stent on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: a comparison with Enterprise stents and the Pipeline device. J Transl Med. 2016. 14(1): 199.
[10] Dholakia RJ, Kappel AD, Pagano A, et al. In vitro angiographic comparison of the flow-diversion performance of five neurovascular stents. Interv Neuroradiol. 2018. 24(2): 150-161.
[11] Li W, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Efficacy of LVIS vs. Enterprise Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Medium-Sized Intracranial Aneurysms: A Hemodynamic Comparison Study. Front Neurol. 2019. 10: 522.
[12] Luo B, Yang X, Wang S, et al. High shear stress and flow velocity in partially occluded aneurysms prone to recanalization. Stroke. 2011. 42(3): 745-53.
[13] Sugiyama S, Niizuma K, Sato K, et al. Blood Flow Into Basilar Tip Aneurysms: A Predictor for Recanalization After Coil Embolization. Stroke. 2016. 47(10): 2541-7.
[14] Xiang J, Damiano RJ, Lin N, et al. High-fidelity virtual stenting: modeling of flow diverter deployment for hemodynamic characterization of complex intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2015. 123(4): 832-40.
[15] Zhang Q, Jing L, Liu J, et al. Predisposing factors for recanalization of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular embolization: a multivariate study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018. 10(3): 252-257.
[16] Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2001. 32(9): 1998-2004.
[17] Byrne JV, Beltechi R, Yarnold JA, Birks J, Kamran M. Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One. 2010. 5(9).
[18] Mitsos AP, Kakalis NM, Ventikos YP, Byrne JV. Haemodynamic simulation of aneurysm coiling in an anatomically accurate computational fluid dynamics model: technical note. Neuroradiology. 2008. 50(4): 341-7.
[19] Lv Z, Zhu Y, Wang W, et al. Comparison of Two Endovascular Interventions with Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support or Pipeline Embolization Device in Middle Cerebral Arterial Aneurysms Patients. J Invest Surg. 2019 : 1-5.
[20] Lu P, Zhang Y, Niu H, Wang Y. Comparison of endovascular treatment for middle cerebral artery aneurysm with a low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent or pipeline embolization device. Exp Ther Med. 2019. 18(3): 2072-2078.
[21] Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013. 44(2): 442-7.
[22] Tremmel M, Xiang J, Natarajan SK, et al. Alteration of intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics for flow diversion using enterprise and vision stents. World Neurosurg. 2010. 74(2-3): 306-15.
[23] Levitt MR, McGah PM, Aliseda A, et al. Cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents: computational models with intravascular blood flow measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014. 35(1): 143-8.
[24] Kojima M, Irie K, Fukuda T, Arai F, Hirose Y, Negoro M. The study of flow diversion effects on aneurysm using multiple enterprise stents and two flow diverters. Asian J Neurosurg. 2012. 7(4): 159-65.
[25] Tian Z, 0000-0002-3635-8915 AO, Zhang M, et al. Hemodynamic differences by increasing low profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stent local compaction across intracranial aneurysm orifice. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020. 26(5): 557-565.
[26] Damiano RJ, 0000-0003-2256-2154 AO, Tutino VM, et al. Aneurysm characteristics, coil packing, and post-coiling hemodynamics affect long-term treatment outcome. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020. 12(7): 706-713.
[27] Lu J, Jing L, Wang C, et al. Effect of hemodynamics on outcome of subtotally occluded paraclinoid aneurysms after stent-assisted coil embolization. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016. 8(11): 1140-1147.