Management of Traumatic Lumbar Meningo-radicular Injury Caused by Foreign Body Penetration using Sling Technique

penetrating spinal injuries (NMPSI) can cause delayed neural injury, including cerebrospinal uid (CSF) leakage and cord related to dural defects. To repair ventral defect is particularly challenging in trauma patients and, in a meanwhile, there has been a well-established method: sling technique, used for patients with idiopathic spinal cord herniation (ISCH) in whom VDD being the primary pathology to deal with.

revealed intact IVC with no major organ damage, and the plier was removed from back under direct visualization of IVC. Immediate posterior approach showed a through-and-through VDD. Sling technique with COOK ® dura substitute was applied to cover the VDD and xed with 7-0 prolene after neurolysis.
There was no CSF leakage or nerve tissue herniation afterward. He regained working ability with full muscle strength except for a minor sequal of paresthesia of right toe.

Conclusions
In patients with NMPSI with VDD, indirect duraplasty using sling technique originally developed for treating patients with ISCH is suitable and effective in preventing CSF leakage and delayed neural injury.
We further propose an algorithm emphasizing key decision makings for repairing dural defect while preventing delayed neural injury.

Background
The majority of nonmissile penetrating spinal injuries (NMPSIs) is attributed to assaults by knives involving lower cervical and upper thoracic.(1) Despite a controversial role of surgical intervention in treating patients with NPMSI with non-retained foreign body (2,3), an invasive treatment comprising safe removal of foreign body and repair of injured structure is oftentimes recommended in those with retained foreign body.(4) NMPSI can be categorized into immediate and delayed types. Immediate spinal injury is caused by direct penetrating injury and vascular injury.(5) Delayed neurological de cit may be caused by CSF leakage, spinal cord herniation, retained foreign body, infection and edema. (6,7) Since immediate injuries occurred before reaching medical cares, efforts should be paid to prevent delayed neurological de cits. Currently, there is no guideline on treating patients with NMPSI, particularly addressing issues on preventing delayed injuries mainly CSF leakage and spinal cord herniation, in other words, repairing dural defect. By presenting this case, we discuss and propose an algorithm for dural defect repair (Fig. 4).

Case Presentation
This is a 51-year-old male construction worker with the past history of colon perforation status post right hemicolectomy. While working, he fell down from an altitude of six meters and landed on a plier placed on the oor vertically (Fig. 1A,B). At the emergency department, he was alert and oriented, with stable vital signs: T: 36.1℃, P:81/min, R:20/min, BP:149/99 mmHg. He complained of low back pain, bilateral extremities numbness and weakness. Physical examination showed smooth breathing sound, no distant heart sound, no Cullen's sign, no abdominal tenderness, and no deformity of extremities. Neurological examination revealed decreased muscle strength (grade 3/3) in bilateral lower extremities, paresthesia below knee and decrease deep tendon re ex of ankle jerk. There was normal anal sphincter tone. Lab data con rmed no anemia (Hb=15.4 g/dL), no renal or hepatic function impairment (BUN=9.8 mg/dL, creatinine=0.86 mg/dL and ALT=33 U/L). A computed tomography showed a pair of pliers penetrating L4 lamina, spinal canal, through vertebral body and psoas muscle into retroperitoneal cavity with IVC indentation (Fig. 2). There was no contrast extravasation or bloody ascites in the peritoneal cavity.
Under the diagnosis of NMPSI with retained foreign body at lumbar level, the patient then underwent emergent combined surgery of trauma surgeon and neurosurgeon for the prevention of IVC bleeding upon foreign body removal. The patient was placed in three-quarter supine position (Fig. 1D). A paramedian laparotomy with transverse extension was done rst to expose right retroperitoneal space after elevation of liver. The plier tip was palpated, con rming that the medial arm located at the lateral aspect of suprarenal IVC and the lateral arm located closely to the upper and lateral pole of right kidney (Fig. 1E). The IVC was intact, accompanying with no injury to renal pedicle artery and mild kidney abrasion. After a rmation that there was no active bleeding or major organ damage, the foreign body was removed cautiously from the back of the patient by neurosurgeon (Fig. 1D). There was CSF leakage and a simple stitch closure was made. After closure of abdominal wound, the patient was then placed in prone position. A midline incision was made and muscle was dissected to expose L3-L4 lamina. After laminectomy and bone chip removal, a through-and-through dural defect was found (Fig. 3A) and several adherent rootlets related to penetrating friction were seen at the margin of VDD. The VDD was tunneled to L3/4 disc space and packed with a piece of antibiotic-soaked gelfoam (Fig. 3B). We applied sling technique with COOK ® arti cial dura to cover the VDD after neurolysis and xed it with 7-0 prolene (Fig.   3C). The dorsal dura defect (DDD) was closed primarily with watertight manner (Fig. 3D).
The patient's lower extremities muscle strength improved to grade 4 and his paresthesia of calf and toes gradually faded away. One week after the operation, he could urinate and ambulate without assistance.
There was no positional headache, nausea, vomiting, neck pain or stiffness post-operatively, indicating no CSF leakage. The patient returned to normal life with mild sequelae of right toe numbness. A follow-up MRI showed patent CSF ow without pseudomeningocele (Fig. 4).

Discussion
Dorsal dura defects (DDD) can often be assessed and approached directly without further manipulation of intrathecal neural structures, therefore a primary repair for linear defect and an augmented duraplasty using various autograft or allograft dural substitutes are suitable (Fig. 5). In a series of 51 patients with spinal stab injury, 78% of whom underwent dorsal dura primary repair with only 2 patients (4%) developed CSF leakage related to wound infection. (5) While dorsal approach provides access to dorsal and lateral dura sac, it does not provide adequate access ventrally unless retracting or mobilizing of the neural structures which is often dangerous especially in cervical and thoracic level. Based on above evidences, for repair of NMPSI with ventral dura defect, the risk of spinal cord mobilization should be of primary concern for choosing appropriate technique (Fig. 5). One thing makes the patients with NMPSI comparable to patients with ISCH is that a blunt injury with dural tissue loss in patients with NMPSI mimicking a spontaneous dura defect in ISCH. With sling procedure, even a larger defect can be repaired indirectly simply by dividing dentate ligament and designing sleeves for segmental roots to pass through. The use of sling procedure in NMPSI has never been reported to our knowledge, and a good outcome in our case demonstrates that sling procedure should be considered in managing patients with ventral dura defect.
For the choice of dural substitute, a great variety of grafts including autograft (ex: muscle fascia, fat), allograft (ex: cadaveric dural graft), xenograft (ex: bovine pericardium) and synthetic graft (ex: ePTFE dural substitute, Te on, Gore-Tex). (12,15) Autograft was the rst applied graft owning to its easy availability, but was limited by insu cient soft tissue and additional incisions. (16,17) Allograft and xenograft are more exible choices regarding to the customized sizes, but they still obtain the concern of immune reactivity and transmissible disease which includes the risk of prion disease. (17,18) To avoid spinal cord damage during the insertion of dural graft, the material should be as thin and soft as possible, which is achievable in synthetic graft that can be less than 1 mm. Synthetic graft is also associated with lower rates of wound infections, adhesions, CSF leaks and reoperation comparing to autograft in literature. (19) In the era of biodesign, various innovative grafts aiming biocompatibility, stronger sealing and better manipulation have been presented. The COOK® dural graft we used is an example of using decellularized extracellular matrix to prevent immune response while still providing natural scaffold for cell growth. (20) Additional sealant to the duraplasty edge may be bene cial to preventing further CSF leakage.

Conclusions
In conclusion, managing patients of NMPSI with dura penetration, safe repair of dural defect is mandatory to prevent delayed neural injury. The location of defect (DDD vs. VDD), level of injury, and whether tissue loss or not, are practical determinants for choosing an appropriate method of dura repair. An indirect repair with sling technique is an easily adapted and effective surgical technique for traumatic VDD.   Intraoperative microscopic pictures of dura repair using sling technique. (A) After partial L3 and L4 laminectomy, a traumatic durotomy was found and it was extended rostrally and caudally for better inspection and management of intrathecal damage. (B) A ventral dural defect was packed with gelfoam for hemostasis and all injured rootlets were gently reduced into intradural cavity. (C) Sling technique was selected to repair the ventral dural defect by using arti cial dural graft (arrowhead), which was sutured on the ventral (not shown) and the dorsal side (asterisks). (D) A nal look of the fully-expanded thecal sac after primary repair of traumatic dural defect.  Dural defect in NMPSI can be categorized into VDD(ventral dural defect) and DDD(dorsal dural defect). In VDD with higher risk of neurological de cits or tissue loss, indirect repair is recommended to minimize secondary injury. In DDD and VDD without tissue loss, direct repair is indicated. Direct repair includes primary closure and duraplasty with substitute; indirect repair includes sling procedure, patch attachment and widening of dural defect.