The circadian clock is a well-described central molecular timekeeping mechanism that regulates biochemical processes within most organisms helping them to perceive and respond to abiotic and biotic environmental cues. Three properties of circadian clock systems indicate their indispensable role in modulating organism-environment interactions. Firstly, their ubiquity: circadian systems are present in nearly all organisms across the various kingdoms of life, and appear to have arisen at least three times during the evolution of life1–3. Circadian clock homologs present in most plants, including algae, are highly conserved4, while the circadian clock components present in fungi and animals also show striking sequence similarity, for example BMAL1/CLOCK in animals and WC-1 in fungi1. In prokaryotes, cyanobacteria circadian systems have been best studied, but homologs of the cyanobacteria circadian clock genes kaiA, kaiB and kaiC are also found in other prokaryotic lineages5.
The adaptive value of the circadian system becomes obvious in populations that have lost circadian rhythms over the course of their evolutionary history, or “switch off” their circadian clocks due to seasonal cues; in both cases, the circadian system becomes less rhythmic under conditions where rhythmicity does not provide adaptive information to the biological system. Independently-evolved populations of the cavefish Astyanax mexicanus show widespread disruption of circadian clock gene rhythmicity, as well as a reduction in rhythmic transcription compared to surface-dwelling populations6. Activating overwintering mechanisms in trees involves an interplay between photoreceptors and the circadian clock, which is then disrupted for the duration of the winter7. Although the circadian rhythms of Svalbard reindeer are attenuated during winter months 8, similarly to that of other Arctic mammals such as the muskox Ovibos moschatus 9 and the red fox Vulpes vulpes10.
The circadian clock provides fitness and performance advantages in a variety of model systems, further supporting its role in environmental adaptation. In plants, the circadian clock aligns chemical defenses to herbivore feeding patterns, regulates drought responses, and anticipates pathogen attack (see Xu et al. 202211 for a recent review of the role of the circadian clock in plant biotic and abiotic stress responses). In fungi, the asexual reproductive patterns of Neurospora crassa have long been observed to be regulated by the circadian clock12,13, while strains of Neurospora discreta with habitat-specific circadian rhythms maintain higher fitness under their respective habitats14.
The central circadian oscillator of N. crassa is composed of the negative element frequency (frq) and its interactions with the White Collar Complex (WCC), composed of proteins encoded by the white collar-1 (wc-1) and white collar-2 (wc-2) genes. WCC activates transcription of frq, which ultimately represses its own expression by affecting the phosphorilation of WC-1 and WC-215,16. Another essential component of the circadian regulator is Frequency Interacting RNA Helicase (FRH), which plays a role in regulating FRQ expression by variably protecting FRQ against ubiquitin-mediated degradation and suppressing frq expression via interaction with the WCC17. This central clock oscillator in turn regulates a variety of downstream transcriptional and post-translational modifications18. The N. crassa circadian clock also exhibits a temperature compensation mechanism, consistent with other circadian clock systems in plants and animals19,20.
The interacting circadian clocks in symbiotic systems are a growing topic of interest21,22. Driven by a recognition of the key role of the gut microbiota on human health, host circadian clock inputs have been found to influence diurnal oscillations in gut microbiota in mice and humans23. In plants, the microbiome influences host circadian clock function in the rhizosphere24. Tightly-regulated circadian systems have been observed corals and algae25,26, as well as between the Hawaiian bobtail squid Euprymna scolopes and the bioluminescent bacteria Vibrio fischeri27. The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizoglomus irregulare also contains a functioning circadian clock system28, which has been hypothesized to play a role in the AMF-plant symbiosis.
The lichen symbiosis is composed of a fungal partner (mycobiont) and a photosynthesizing partner, either a green alga and/or a cyanobacterium (photobiont), plus a more or less specific suite of associated prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms (e.g. 29,30). The lichen lifestyle – a fungal nutritional mode that relies on photosynthetic products of internally accommodated algal symbionts – occurs in unrelated lineages across the fungal tree of life, but is most prevalent in the Leotiomyceta (e.g. Lecanoromycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Dothideomycetes) within the Ascomycota31. Lichens are ubiquitous in the landscape, thriving in a diverse range of habitats across nearly all ecosystems32. This ubiquity is likely related to lichens’ capability to withstand extreme abiotic stresses, such as complete desiccation33,34. This ability to withstand stress may be due to variable stress response pathways relative to other sessile organisms; the lichen Endocarpon pustillum maintains active transcription of metabolism-associated genes during osmotic stress that are largely suppressed in plants and fungi35.
Although lichens have been acknowledged as a symbiosis of interest to explore symbiotic circadian clock systems22,36, little work has been done to elucidate the circadian clock mechanism in lichens aside from the identification of the putative frq ortholog in the lichen-forming fungus Umbilicaria pustulata37. An important prerequisite step to further studies of the lichen circadian clock is to determine how conserved the core circadian clock and photosensory machinery is across phylogenetically unrelated mycobionts, as well as to determine whether this core machinery is functional.
Here, we investigate the presence of putative circadian clock components across the Fungi, focusing on major lineages in the Ascomycota that include lichens. We performed this investigation using a two-pronged approach: a phylogenetic analysis of putative homologs of the core circadian clock genes frq, wc-1, wc-2, and frh, and functional validation of one core mechanism in the fungal circadian clock. To investigate the presence of circadian clock homologs in lichen-forming fungi, we queried genomes of lichen-forming and non-lichen-forming fungi available in GenBank and JGI. To investigate whether frq homologs in lichen-forming fungal lineages maintain their primary circadian function as targets of the WCC, we then investigated the transcript abundance of frq putative homologs in response to light in Dermatocarpon miniatum (Ascomycota, Eurotiomycetes) and U. pustulata (Ascomycota, Lecanoromycetes), two species belonging to different Ascomycete classes.
We find that homologs of the core fungal circadian clock genes, frq, wc-1, wc-2, and frh are present in lichen-forming Lecanoromycetes, Eurotiomycetes and Dothideomycetes, and that these orthologs contain strongly conserved protein-coding sequences in the functional domains of these genes. We demonstrate the light-dependent expression of the core clock gene frq in two highly diverged lichen-forming lineages, U. pustulata and D. miniatum. Taken together, these results demonstrate that lichen mycobionts retain functional light-responsive mechanisms, including a functioning circadian clock, similar to those of non-lichen-forming filamentous fungi.