Gorham–Stout syndrome, characterized by a tumor-like lesion with large osteolysis, is sporadic with severe symptoms and poor prognosis 1,2. Local swelling can occur when the lesion invades the soft tissue surrounding the bone, and chylothorax can occur when the lesion invades the chest wall, ribs, vertebrae, or thoracic duct3. Gorham–Stout syndrome's etiology and pathogenesis remain uncertain and controversial4. The existence and role of osteoclasts and vascular and lymphatic vessels have been controversial in the pathogenesis of Gorham–Stout syndrome 5–8.
Clinical manifestations of Gorham–Stout syndrome vary, with onset ages reported ranging from 1 month to 92 years. The severity of the disease usually depends on the involved structures and the progression of osteolysis, and there are generally no systemic symptoms 9,10. Past trauma has been mentioned in specific individuals 11. There was no history of trauma in our case, and the disease began after the age of 65.
Localized discomfort, swelling, weakness, functional impairment of afflicted limbs, respiratory distress and failure, neurological problems, deformities, and paralysis are among symptoms that can be seen in Gorham–Stout syndrome. Areas commonly affected by Gorham–Stout syndrome include the ribs, spine, pelvis, limb bones, shoulder blades12. This case was characterized by progressive dyspnea, and the symptoms caused by bone destruction were not obvious.
In addition to conventional X-ray, CT, and MRI, bone scan, SPECT/CT, and PET/CT can also be used for imaging examination of Gorham–Stout syndrome3. X-rays usually show bone absorption but no periosteal reaction. CT scan can show the location and number of osteolytic lesions more clearly than X-ray13. 18F-NaF-PET/CT showed higher consistency in Gorham–Stout syndrome lesions, opening new possibilities for diagnosis, degree of disease activity, and treatment response 14. Our case contains multiple bone lesions consistent with the typical presentation of Gorham–Stout syndrome.
Pathological diagnosis is essential for the diagnosis of Gorham–Stout syndrome. The pathological findings are closely related to the site of the specimen. The typical pathological findings are bone resorption and replacement by vascular or lymphatic thin-walled monolayer endothelial cells, accompanied by infiltration of lymphatic and vascular soft tissue, without cellular atypia and inflammatory infiltration3. Immunohistochemistry shows that D2-40 intense staining of lymphatic endothelial cells in dilated lymphatic vessels may be one of the characteristics of Gorham–Stout syndrome15, which is consistent with the pathological findings of our case.
There are no biomarkers for Gorham–Stout syndrome; however, several studies have mentioned miRNAs and serum biomarkers as potential biomarkers 2,16.
Given the disease's rarity, there are no established treatment guidelines. However, there have been studies of pharmaceutical therapy, surgery, radiotherapy, or combinations above. Interferon, bisphosphonates, calcium salts, and vitamin D; interferon and zoledronic acid; cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil; salmon calcitonin, alendronate sodium, and sirolimus were among the pharmacological therapies employed3,17. Sirolimus is an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which has antiangiogenic properties and prevents the development of chylothorax in Gorham–Stout syndrome patients18. The chylothorax did not develop after superior vena cava angiography in our case. The reason may be that the contrast agent blocks abnormal lymphatic vessels.
The main manifestations of our patient were chylothorax and bone destruction. After completing many examinations, the etiology was still unknown. The diagnosis was confirmed by thoracoscopy and bone biopsy. Therefore, the possibility of Gorham–Stout syndrome should be ruled out in patients with clinical chylothorax. We cured chylothorax with superior vena cava angiography. However, the effectiveness of superior vena cava angiography still needs further research.