Second and third harmonic generation from simultaneous high peak- and high average-power thin disk laser

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1502013/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Second and third harmonic generation from simultaneous high peak- and high average-power thin disk laser

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1502013/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

We report Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) and Third Harmonic Generation (THG) energy conversion efficiencies up to 59% and 27%, respectively for laser pulses simultaneously delivering high peak power in the sub-TW range and average powers in the sub-kW range. No damage or efficiency decrease is observed after more than 100 hours operation time. The resulting high-energy visible and near-UV pulses are suitable for applications like lightning control, material analysis and machining, or OPCPA pumping.

The advent of chirped pulse amplification (CPA) and thin disk technology allowed the development of ultrashort laser systems with unprecedented performance, in terms of either peak- or average- powers. However, very few systems [1,2] have the potential of providing these performances simultaneously, such as terawatt peak power and kilowatt average power. As an exception, a CPA Ytterbium thin disk laser was recently developed, providing a sech² pulse with 0.689 TW peak power at 1 kHz repetition rate [1,3]. In the context of laser filamentation, terawatt peak intensity is required to produce long plasma channels, and simultaneously high average power is needed to heat up the conductive channel and provide a lower density column to guide lightning strikes [4-7]. For lightning control applications, shorter wavelengths like the second or third harmonic of the 1030 nm fundamental radiation, could be more advantageous, as ionization of the air molecules requires corresponding less photons [8-9]. Several other applications would also benefit from shorter wavelengths, like remote laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (R-LIBS, [10-11]), multiplexed and wide-field micro-machining [12], particle acceleration [13] and pumping of OPCPAs [14].

Frequency doubling and tripling laser beams that provide simultaneously TW-peak and kW-average powers constitutes a significant technological challenge. Unlike for nanosecond pulses, high SHG conversion efficiencies, exceeding 50%, are difficult to achieve for intense pulses in the picosecond and femtosecond regimes, due to dispersion, damage due to ionization or ablation, and self- as well as cross-phase modulation affecting the phase matching between the pump and the harmonic field [15]. A record conversion efficiency of 80% for ultrashort TW pulses was achieved with a Nd:Glass laser at the LLE facility, providing 1 J at 1053 nm, in 500 fs pulses (2 TW) already in 1995, using a type I KDP crystal [16]. The repetition rate was, however, in the order of 1 shot every tens of minutes. More recently, 400 TW of SHG peak power in 500 fs pulses were demonstrated at the Orion facility, with a conversion efficiency of 40% [17]. Similar efficiencies (45%) were obtained at fundamental intensities of 50 GW/cm² [18], and even nearly 80% from a 150 TW Ti:Sapphire laser delivering 4 J pulses at 800 nm, at a repetition rate of 5 Hz [19]. Conversely, 2 kW average powers have been obtained for SHG of picosecond pulses at very high repetition rates, but with modest peak powers of 1 GW [20]. In the present paper, we report the use of large aperture (50-55 mm) LBO crystals for obtaining as much as 295 mJ at 515 nm (0.3 TW peak, 295 W average power, 59% efficiency) for near infrared (NIR) pulses of 495 mJ, 1 ps duration (0.5 TW peak, 500 W average power). We also obtained 96 mJ in 1 ps or 118 mJ in 3 ps at 343 nm (~100 GW peak and 100 W average power, up to 27 % energy efficiency), from NIR laser pulses of 430 mJ (0.43 TW peak, 430 W average power).

The experimental setup is sketched in Fig. 1. The thin disk Yb:YAG laser system has been described in detail elsewhere [1]. Briefly, it consists of a commercial fiber-based seed laser (Trumpf TruMicro 2000), providing stretched pulses (1 ns) at 1030 nm with an energy up to 100 μJ, a commercial regenerative amplifier (Trumpf DIRA 200-1) boosting the pulse energy up to 240 mJ at 1 kHz, a custom-design multipass amplifier based on 4 thin disk laser heads, pumped each by 2.5 kW diode lasers at 940 nm providing 800 mJ pulses, and a large grating compressor, which recompresses the pulses slightly under 1 ps with an efficiency of 90%. The final output of the Yb thin disk laser system is thus 720 mJ, 920 fs, 1 kHz, although the present work used pulse energies only up to 495 mJ. The slightly astigmatic beam delivers a fluence of up to 70 mJ/cm² in a diameter of 30 mm (1/e²), with an M² of 1.89 (resp. 2.32) for the major (resp. minor) axis (See Fig. 1a).

Large aperture lithium triborate (LBO) crystals were grown by Cristal Lasers SA for frequency doubling and tripling the output of the thin disk Yb laser system. LBO was selected as nonlinear material on the basis of its high damage threshold (18.9 GW/cm² at 1053 nm [21]), low dilatation coefficient (|q_L| = 10⁵ K^‑1), excellent transmission (absorption µ < 10^‑2 m^‑1 at 1.064 μm [22]) and relatively high nonlinear coefficient of (d₃₂ = 1.02 pm/V [23]). A major aspect was also the technological possibility of producing large aperture crystals (55 mm x 55 mm x 1.8 mm) with excellent optical quality. The thickness of the crystals was selected as the result of optimizing the trade-off between phase matching, group velocity mismatch, efficiency and walk off with the help of the SNLO Classic software from AS—Photonics [24].

For SHG, the AR coated crystal was cut at angles q = 90° and ϕ = 13.8° in order to achieve type I (o-o-e) phase matching. The remaining near-IR was removed from the frequency-doubled beam by using a dichroic mirror, and measured by a Coherent PM1K thermopile sensor. Alternatively, measuring the whole output beam before and after the SHG LBO crystal showed that losses in the LBO crystal remained within the margin of error of the powermeter.

No temperature stabilization was used. No damage was observed over the whole experimental campaign, neither due to overheating nor to nonlinear damages of the surfaces, nor to hot spots/filamentation in the LBO bulk crystal.

A second large aperture LBO crystal was grown for mixing (SFG) the SHG and the fundamental beams to generate the third harmonic (THG) at 343 nm. More precisely, we used a f 50 mm x 2 mm crystal, AR coated at the 3 wavelengths, and cut at q = 90° and ϕ = 50.5° in the YZ plane, in order to achieve type II (o-e-o) phase matching. This configuration allows for a direct SHG-THG crystal stacking, without the need for a half-wave plate. The THG was separated from the beam by using a dichroic beam splitter with 95.6% reflection at 343 nm (Thorlabs HBSY23), and measured with the same Coherent PM1K thermopile sensor. The measured 2% reflection of the fundamental and SHG on the beam splitter was subtracted from the measurement.

The SHG conversion efficiency (Fig. 2) exhibits the characteristic tanh² behavior of a frequency-doubling process with depleted pump [25]. Even for an intensity of 70 GW/cm², the saturation is not reached as the conversion efficiency still rises. Higher intensities would, however, increase the risk of damaging the coating and the crystal. At the maximum investigated pump power (0.5 TW), the 515 nm output reaches 295 mJ, i.e. ~ 0.3 TW peak power and 295 W average power, for a spectral width of 1.6 nm (Fig. 3b). This corresponds to an energy conversion efficiency of 59%. As mentioned in the introduction, simultaneous high peak and high average power in the green spectral region was not reported before. For example, the impressively high yield (80%) and energy (3.2 J) reported in [19] only correspond to an average power of 16 W. The divergence of the SHG beam was minimal, with a beam diameter growing from 3 to 5 cm over 127 m propagation, i.e., a divergence of 0.16 mrad comparable to that of the NIR pump beam. No significant modification of the divergence due to thermal lensing in the crystals was observed.

Figure 4 displays the output energy and conversion efficiency into the third harmonic. The 1 ps pulses reach a peak conversion efficiency of 26%, while the maximum output energy (117 mJ, i.e., 27% conversion efficiency, 117 W average power and 39 GW peak power) is obtained with pulses of 3 ps. The corresponding spectral width is 0.8 nm (Fig. 3a)

This is most likely due to c⁽³⁾-induced phase mismatch effects via cross- and self-phase modulation occurring at higher intensities, and to back conversion [26]. Nonlinear absorption in the crystal and the associated thermal effects may also contribute. Two-photon absorption at 515 nm can be excluded, and two-photon absorption at 343 nm is unlikely since the LBO bandgap lies at 7.78 eV [27]. However, some three photons absorption may still occur, as already observed in LBO [28]. Slight misalignments may also have contributed. On the other hand, multiphoton absorption in the UV often induces photo-damage or long-term loss of conversion efficiency [26], which was not observed in our case, even after more than 100 hours of operation to date. Moreover, the smooth spectral tails show no sharp cut, excluding issues with the angular acceptance of the crystal.

Reducing the peak power by stretching the pulse is a common and efficient way of reducing the B-integral and therefore shifting the onset of filamentation to longer distances [7, 29, 30]. Indeed, due to nonlinear effects in air, such as Kerr self-focusing, a 96 GW peak power laser pulse at 343 nm would self-collapse as a bundle of filaments after only 33 m of propagation [28, 29]. Chirping the pulse to 3 ps duration shifts the saturation of the conversion efficiency to higher input energies, so that the THG beam reaches 27% of conversion efficiency (118 mJ, 40 GW peak- and 118 W average power). Further chirping the pulse to 5 ps reduces the maximum conversion efficiency to 21%.

In conclusion, we demonstrated SHG and THG conversion efficiencies of up to 59% and 27%, respectively with a high energy, high repetition rate Yb thin disk laser system. These performances are unprecedented for laser systems simultaneously delivering high peak and average powers, in the sub-kW and sub-TW, respectively.

Funding: European Union Horizon 2020 Research and innovation programme FET-OPEN under the grant agreement no 737033-LLR.

Author contributions: JPW designed the study; UA, TP, MM conceived and built the experimental setup; CH, PK, TM, KM conceived the laser source; UA, PW, VM, BM, TP, ML, LB, YBA performed the experiments; DL produced the doubling and tripling crystals; TM, KM, AM, JK, AH, JPW supervised the experiment; TP, VM, PW, JK, JPW analyzed the results; JPW and JK drafted the manuscript, All authors were given the opportunity to review the manuscript and approved it.

Acknowledgements: We acknowledge the mechanical workshop of the University of Geneva for their contributions to the experimental setup

Disclosures: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability: Data underlying the results presented in this paper are available upon request to the authors.

C. Herkommer, P. Krötz, R. Jung, S. Klingebiel, C. Wandt, R. Bessing, P. Walch, T. Produit, K. Michel, D. Bauer, R. Kienberger, and T. Metzger, Opt. Express 28 (20), 30164 (2020).
Y. Wang, H. Chi, C Baumgarten, K. Dehne, A. R. Meadows, A. Davenport, G. Murray, B. A. Reagan, C. S. Menoni and J. J. Rocca, Opt. Lett. 45, 6615-6618(2020)
T. Produit, P. Walch, C. Herkommer, A. Mostajabi, M. Moret, U. Andral, A. Sunjerga, M. Azadifar, Y.-B. André, B. Mahieu, W. Haas, B. Esmiller, G. Fournier, P. Krötz, T. Metzger, K. Michel, A Mysyrowicz, M. Rubinstein, F. Rachidi, J Kasparian, J.-P. Wolf and A. Houard, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 10504 (2021).
P. Rambo, J. Biegert, V. Kubecek, J. Schwarz, A. Bernstein, J.-C. Diels, R. Bernstein, and K. Stahlkopf, J. Opt. Tech. 66, 194 (1999).
D. Comtois, C. Y. Chien, A. Desparois, F. Gérin, G. Jarry, T. W. Johnston, J. C. Kieffer, B. L. Fontaine, F. Martin, R. Mawassi, H. Pépin, F. A. M. Rizk, F. Vidal, P. Couture, H. P. Mercure, C. Potvin, A. Bondiou-Clergerie, and I. Gallimberti, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 819 (2000).
J. Kasparian, R. Ackermann, Y.-B. André, G. Méchain, G. Méjean, B. Prade, P. Rohwetter, E. Salmon, K. Stelmaszczyk, J. Yu, A. Mysyrowicz, R. Sauerbrey, L. Wöste, and J.-P. Wolf, Opt. Express 16, 5757 (2008)
J.-P. Wolf, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81(2) 026001 (2018).
X. M. Zhao, J.-C. Diels, C. Y. Wang and J. M. Elizondo, IEEE J. Q. E. 31, 599-612 (1995).
E. Schubert, A. Rastegari, C. Feng, D. Mongin, B. Kamer, J. Kasparian, J.-P. Wolf, L. Arissian, and J.-C. Diels, New J. of Phys. 19, 123040 (2017).
K. Stelmaszczyk, P. Rohwetter, G. Méjean, J. Yu, E. Salmon, J. Kasparian, R. Ackermann, J.-P. Wolf, and L. Wöste, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3977 (2004).
H. L. Xu, W. Liu, and S. L. Chin, Opt. Lett. 31, 1540 (2006).
B. Franta, E. Mazur and S.K. Sundaram, Int. Mater. Rev. 63, 227–240 (2017).
M. Kozlova, I. Andriyash, J. Gautier, S. Sebban, S. Smartsev, N. Jourdain, U. Chulagain, Y. Azamoum, A. Tafzi, J.P. Goddet, K. Oubrerie, C. Thaury, A. Rousse and K. Ta Phuoc, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011061 (2020).
ELI-beam L1: https://www.eli-beams.eu/facility/lasers/laser-1-allegra-100-mj-1-khz/
V. Krylov, A. Rebane, A.G. Kalintsev, H. Schwoerer and U.P. Wild, Opt. Lett. 20, 198 (1995).
C.Y. Chien, G. Korn, J.S. Coe, J. Squier, G. Mourou, and R.S. Craxton, Opt. Lett. 20, 353 (1995).
S. Parker, C. Danson, D. Egan, S. Elsmere, M. Girling, E. Harvey, D. Hillier, D. Hussey, S. Masoero, J Mc Loughlin, R Penman, P Treadwell, D Winter and N Hopps, High Power Laser Sci. and Eng. 6, e47 (2018).
A. Marcinkevicius, R. Tommasini, G.D. Tsakiris, K.J. Witte, E. Gaizauskas, U. Teubner, Appl. Phys. B 79, 547 (2004).
C. Aparajit, K. Jana, A. D. Lad, Y. M. Ved, A. Couairon, G. R. Kumar, Opt. Lett. 46, 3540 (2021).
C. Röcker, A. Loescher, F. Bienert, P. Villeval, D. Lupinski, D. Bauer, A. Killi, T. Graf, and M. Abdou Ahmed, Opt. Lett. 45, 5522-5525 (2020).
http://www.redoptronics.com/LBO-crystal.html
https://eksmaoptics.com/nonlinear-and-laser-crystals/nonlinear-crystals/lithium-triborate-lbo-crystals/
T Schröder, K.-J. Boller, A. Fix, R. Wallenstein, Appl.Phys. B 58, 425-438 (1994) doi: 10.1007/BF01081885
https://as-photonics.com/products/snlo/ - last accessed March 2^nd, 2022
“Nonlinear Optics”, R. Boyd, 3rd Edition, Academic Press (2008), ISBN: 9780123694706
S. Möller, A. Andresen, C. Merschjann, B. Zimmermann, M. Prinz, and M. Imlau, Opt. Express 15, 7351 (2007).
R. H. French, J. W. Ling, F. S. Ohuchi, and C. T. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 44, 8496 (1991).
C. Mühlig and S. Bublitz, Laser Congress 2019 (ASSL, LAC, LS&C), OSA Technical Digest, paper JTu3A.24.
A. Couairon and A. Mysyrowicz, Physics Reports 441, 47-189 (2007).
L. Bergé, S. Skupin, R. Nuter, J. Kasparian, J.P. Wolf, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 1633-1713 (2007).

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
04 Jul, 2022
Reviews received at journal
15 Jun, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
11 Jun, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
08 Jun, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
07 Apr, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
06 Apr, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
04 Apr, 2022
First submitted to journal
29 Mar, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Second and third harmonic generation from simultaneous high peak- and high average-power thin disk laser

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1. Introduction

2. Experimental Set-up

3. Results And Discussion

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1