Characteristics and Perioperative Outcomes of Fracture in Elderly patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1505602/v1

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is to observe the characteristics and perioperative outcomes of fracture in elderly adults with chronic heart failure (CHF).

Methods: We searched elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with CHF who developed fracture from January 2017 to February 2021. The gender, age, fracture types, electrocardiogram (ECG), laboratory results, comorbidities, complications, length of hospital stay and mortality of these patients were collected. Risk factors for perioperative cardiovascular disease (CVD) were identified.

Results: A total of 104 patients were brought into this study, including 65 female patients (62.5%) and 39 male patients (37.5%). The average age of these patients was 79.5 years old. In those 104 patients, 24 (23.1%) had HFrEF, 49 (47.1%) had HFmrEF, and 31 had HFpEF (29.8%). More than half of the patients had three or more comorbidities, and coronary artery disease was the most common comorbidity (60.6%). The incidence of perioperative CVD and non-cardiac complications was 59.6% and 95.1%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 11.0 (7.0-19.0) days. The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.8%, and 1-year mortality rate was 19.2%. Arrhythmia (40%) was the most common perioperative CVD, and hypoalbuminemia (69.2%) was the most common non-cardiac complication. Multivariate analyses showed that age≥80 years, comorbidities≥3 and hip fracture were associated with increased rates of perioperative CVD.

Conclusion: Our results revealed elderly CHF patients with more comorbidities are prone to perioperative CVD after fracture, more comprehensive prevention and integrated management approaches will be required for these patients.

Introduction

With the acceleration of the aging of society, the number of elderly fracture patients is increasing, which has become an important public health concern[1, 2]. More fractures in the elderly are associated with osteoporosis, and hip fracture is the most common fractures in older adults with osteoporosis[3, 4]. One report showed that the 1-year mortality rate after fracture in elderly patients was 8.4–36%[5].

HF is another common cause of disability and mortality[6]. Moreover, HF and bone fracture share common risk factors. HF is considered a risk factor for fracture. Decreased skeletal muscle mass and bone density in older adults with CHF increase the risk of falls and fracture[7]. However, few studies on the association between fracture complications and HF. HF is classified according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Previous studies found that HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF can predict perioperative adverse events and mortality in older adults who underwent hip fracture surgery[810] .

The mechanism of perioperative complications and mortality is extremely complex. The studies have shown that cardiac complications are related to inflammatory response and perioperative traumatic stress[11, 12].

We retrospectively described the characteristics of different heart failure types and the effects on fracture complications and mortality. These findings help to understand characteristics of older fracture patients with CHF and make recommendations for the management of these patients.

Materials And Methods

Patients and Groups

We retrospectively collected data from January 2017 to February 2021 at a Level I trauma center in China. Elderly patients (age≥65) with chronic heart failure who developed bone fractures were included in our study. Patients with any of the following conditions were excluded from this study: (1) had pathological fracture, (2) had multiple fracture, (3) had secondary fracture, (4) incomplete medical information. CHF was defined as a clinical history of heart failure or reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), patients were defined as HFrEF, HFmrEF or HFPEF according to current European guideline[13]. HFrEF patients had an LVEF ≤ 40%, HFmrEF patients had an LVEF of 40%–49%, and HFPEF patients had an LVEF ≥50%. This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University and the informed consent was waived for its retrospective nature.

Data Collection

We collected information included sex, age, and fracture types, comorbidities, echocardiographic and laboratory data,length of hospital stay and mortality. The echocardiographic data included LVEF, left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular fractional shortening (LEFS). Laboratory data  at time of hospital admission included white blood cell, haemoglobin(HB), haematocrit, platelet count, albumin(ALB), creatinine, sodium, potassium, C-reactive protein(CRP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Perioperative CVD was defined as arrhythmia, angina pectoris, cardiac arrest, acute myocardial infarction. Other perioperative complications were hypoproteinemia, anemia, electrolyte disorders, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia and acute cerebral infarction.

Statistical Analysis  

Continuous data are expressed as medians with 1st and 3rd quartiles. Nonparametric test was used to analyze differences between the groups. Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages and Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used for comparing categorical variables. Univariate analysis and stepwise logistic regression were used to incorporate statistically significant variables into multivariate models to identify independent risk factors for perioperative CVD. All analyzes were performed using IBM SPSS software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). P<0.05 was considered as significance.

Results

Baseline characteristics

The baseline characteristics of fracture patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF were presented in Table 1. We collected information on 104 individuals with fracture. There are 39 males (37.5%) and 65 females (62.5%). The average age was 79.5 (74.0–86.0) years. 55 (52.9%) patients were presenting with three or more comorbidities, which consisted of coronary artery disease (60.6%), hypertension (57.7%), cerebrovascular disease (46.2%), diabetes mellitus (30.8%), atrial fibrillation (16.3%), chronic lung disease (10.6%), tumor (6.7%), valvular disease (5.8%), chronic kidney disease (5.8%), cardiomyopathy (2.9%). The most common fracture type was hip fracture, which was presented in 83.7% of the patients. Of the 104 patients, 24 (23.1%) had HFrEF, 49 (47.1%) had HFmrEF, and 31 had HFpEF (29.8%). The age and incidence of hip fracture were higher in patients with HFpEF than in those with HFrEF and HFmrEF. Other characteristics were not significantly different among the three groups.

Table 1

Comparison of the demographic characteristics of fracture patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFPEF

Variable

Overall (n = 104)

HFrEF (n = 24)

HFmrEF(n = 49)

HFpEF(n = 31)

P-value

Age(years)

79.5 (74.0–86.0)

75.5 (71.0-81.5)

79.0 (72.0–86.0)

83.0 (78.0–88.0)

0.008

Female gender

Male

39 (37.5)

10 (41.7)

22 (44.9)

7 (22.6)

0.120

Female

65 (62.5)

14 (58.3)

27 (55.1)

24(77.4)

 

Comorbidites

Coronary artery disease

63 (60.6)

17 (70.8)

28 (57.1)

18 (58.1)

0.533

Hypertension

60 (57.7)

15 (62.5)

25 (51.0)

20 (64.5)

0.470

Cerebrovascular disease

48 (46.2)

8 (33.3)

23 (46.9)

17 (54.8)

0.287

Diabetes mellitus

32 (30.8)

11(45.8)

13 (26.5)

8 (25.8)

0.185

Atrial fibrillation

17 (16.3)

3 (12.5)

8 (16.3)

6 (19.4)

0.839

Chronic lung disease

11 (10.6)

3 (12.5)

3 (6.1)

5 (16.1)

0.345

Tumor

7 (6.7)

0 (0.0)

6 (12.2)

1 (3.2)

0.155

Valvular disease

6 (5.8)

3 (12.5)

2 (4.1)

1 (3.2)

0.354

Chronic kidney disease

6 (5.8)

0 (0.0)

3 (6.1)

3 (9.7)

0.409

Cardiomyopathy

3 (2.9)

1 (4.2)

1 (2.0)

1 (3.2)

1.000

Comorbidites ≥ 3

55 (52.9)

15 (62.5)

20 (40.8)

20 (64.5)

0.073

Type of Fracture

Hip fracture

87 (83.7)

18 (75.0)

39 (79.6)

30 (96.8)

0.041

Others

17 (16.3)

6 (25.0)

10 (20.4)

1 (3.2)

 

Echocardiography and laboratory data

As shown in Table 2, there were significant differences in LVEF, LVEDD, and LEFS among the three groups. The LVEF of patients in the HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF groups were 37.0 (34.2–37.7) 45.0 (42.2–46.0) 61.0 (57.0–64.0). HFrEF, HFmrEF had a larger LVEDD than HFPpEF, and LEFS was higher in HFpEF than in the other two groups (p<0.05). The white blood cell and haemoglobin and haematocrit in HFpEF were lower than those in the other two groups(p<0.05). There was no significant difference in other data among the three groups

Table 2

Comparison of the echocardiography and Laboratory data of fracture patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFPEF

Variable

Overall(n = 104)

HFrEF (n = 24)

HFmrEF(n = 49)

HFpEF(n = 31)

P-value

Echocardiography

 

LVEF(%)

45.0 (39.0–56.0)

37.0 (34.2–37.7)

45.0 (42.2–46.0)

61.0 (57.0–64.0)

0.000

LVEDD

49.0 (44.0–54.0)

52.5 (47.2–59.0)

52.0 (47.25-55.0)

46.0 (42.0–49.0)

0.002

LEFS

23.0 (21.0–30.0)

18.0 (17.0-22.5)

22.0 (21.0–24.0)

33.0 (30.0–35.0)

0.000

Laboratory data

         

White blood cell (×109/L)

7.7 (5.9–9.8)

8.0 (6.2-9.0)

8.1( 6.6–10.7)

6.8 (4.7–8.4)

0.027

Haemoglobin(g/L)

110.0 (96.2-120.9)

115.0 (107.5-124.6)

110.0 (96.5-121.5)

103.5(88.3-114.9)

0.033

Haematocrit (%)

33.5 (29.2–36.7)

35.3 (32.1–38.0)

33.4 (29.6–36.7)

31.4 (26.9–34.9)

0.036

Platelet count (×109/L)

177.3 (140.9-225.7)

188.5 (138.1-228.1)

179.4 (155.9-220.5)

171.0(110.5-233.3)

0.666

Albumin (g/L)

35.9 (26.1–41.4)

38.5 (34.7–40.5)

36.4 (33.1–38.0)

36.0(32.7-38.65)

0.217

Creatinine(µmol/L)

76.1 (61.7-100.6)

77.5 (64.6-104.6)

76.9 (61.9–97.5)

74.0(58.7-133.7)

0.898

Sodium(mmol/L)

137.1 (134.4-139.2)

137.9 (134.9-139.4)

137.6 (134.8-139.5)

135.5(133.8-137.6)

0.105

Potassium(mmol/L)

4.1 (3.8–4.5)

4.0 (3.6–4.5)

4.2 (3.9–4.5)

4.1 (3.7–4.4)

0.779

C-reactive protein (mg/L)

35.1 (12.6–56.4)

35.3 (7.25–50.3)

32.9 (12.6–72.5)

36.5 (16.5–47.2)

0.672

Plasma BNP (pg/mL)

353.0 (170.0-695.0)

500.0 (215.0-717.0)

346.0(142.5–624.0)

351.0 (203.5-666.5)

0.550

In-hospital outcomes and 1-year mortality

Comparison of perioperative complications, length of hospital stay and mortality are presented in Table 3. The incidence of perioperative CVD and non-cardiac complications were 59.6% and 95.1%, respectively. Arrhythmia was the most common cardiac complication, with rates up to 40%. Other CVD were angina pectoris (24.0%), cardiac arrest (4.8%) and acute myocardial infarction (2.9%). In addition, non-cardiac complications included hypoproteinemia (69.2%), anemia (54.8%), electrolyte disorder (52.9%), deep vein thrombosis (33.7%), pneumonia (27.9%) and acute cerebral infarction (5.8%). The mean length of hospital stay was 11.0 (7.0–19.0) days. The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.8%, and the 1-year mortality rate was 19.8%. The number of complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality were not statistically different among the three groups.

Table 3

Perioperative complications, length of the in-hospital stay and mortality

Variable

Overall(n = 104)

HFrEF(n = 24)

HFmrEF(n = 49)

HFpEF(n = 31)

P-value

CVD

62 (59.6)

12 (50.0)

30 (61.2)

20 (64.5)

0.520

Arrhythmia

45 (43.3)

9 (37.5)

23 (46.9)

13 (41.9)

0.738

Angina pectoris

25 (24.0)

4 (16.7)

12 (24.5)

9 (29.0)

0.579

Cardiac arrest

5 ( 4.8)

3 (12.5)

2 (4.1)

0 (0.0)

0.107

Acute myocardial infarction

3 (2.9)

1 (4.2)

2 (4.1)

0 (0.0)

0.600

Non-cardiac complications

Hypoproteinemia

72 (69.2)

16 (66.7)

38 (77.6)

18 (58.1)

0.089

Anemia

57 (54.8)

10 (41.7)

32 (65.3)

15 (48.4)

0.117

Electrolyte disorders

55 (52.9)

15 (62.5)

25 (51.0)

15 (48.4)

0.585

Deep vein thrombosis

35 (33.7)

7 (29.2)

18 (36.7)

10 (32.3)

0.832

Pneumonia

29 (27.9)

6 (25.0)

16 (32.7)

7 (22.6)

0.581

Acute cerebral infarction

6 (5.8)

2 (8.0)

3 (6.1)

1 (3.2)

0.337

In-hospital stay

11.0 (7.0–19.0)

9 (6.0–20.0)

16 (6.5–22.5)

10 (9.0–15.0)

0.282

In hospital mortality

5 (4.8)

3 (12.5)

2 (4.1)

0 (0.0)

0.107

1-year mortality

20(19.2)

4(16.7)

8(16.3)

8(25.8)

0.557

The comparison of the perioperative CVD and without perioperative CVD

As can be seen in Table 4, univariate analysis showed that patients with perioperative CVD were older(≥ 80 years, p = 0.001), had more comorbidities (≥ 3, p = 0.037) and a higher proportion of hip fractures (93.5 vs 69.0,p = 0.002). They also had a higher hypernatremia rate (38.7 vs 19.0, p = 0.033) than patients without perioperative CVD. However, there were no statistically significant differences in gender, comorbidities and others among the three groups. (p > 0.05).

Table 4

Univariate Analyses for Factors Associated With Preioperative CVD

Variables

Total

With CVD

Without CVD

P value

Gender

Male

39 (37.5)

26 (41.9)

13 (31.0)

0.256

Female

65 (62.5)

36 (58.1)

29 (69.0)

 

Age ≥ 80

52 (50.0)

39 (62.9)

13 (31.0)

0.001

Hjp fracture

87 (83.7)

58 (93.5)

29 (69.0)

0.002

Cormobidities

Coronary artery disease

63 (60.6)

41 (66.1)

22 (52.4)

0.159

Hypertension

60 (57.7)

40 (64.5)

20 (47.6)

0.087

Cerebrovascular disease

48 (46.2)

33 (53.2)

15 (35.7)

0.079

Diabetes mellitus

32 (30.8 )

18 (29.0)

14 (33.3)

0.641

Atrial fibrillation

17 (16.3)

13 (21.0)

4 (9.5)

0.201

Chronic lung disease

11 (10.6)

5 (8.1)

6 (14.3)

0.311

Tumor

7 (6.7)

4 (6.5)

3 (7.1)

1.000

Valvular disease

6 (5.8)

3 (4.8)

3 (7.1)

0.947

Chronic kidney disease

6 (5.8)

5 (8.1)

1 (2.4)

0.429

Cardiomyopathy

3 (2.9)

1 (1.6)

2(4.8)

0.731

Cormobidities ≥ 3

55 (52.9)

38 (61.3)

17 (40.5)

0.037

LVEF<40%

27 (26.0)

14 (22.5)

13 (31.0)

0.339

BNP ≥ 300

60 (57.7)

39 (62.9)

21 (50.0)

0.191

HB<90

14 (13.5)

12 (19.4)

2 (4.8)

0.065

AlB<30

11(10.6)

6 (9.7)

5 (11.9)

0.717

CRP ≥ 10

83 (79.8)

52 (83.9)

31 (73.8)

0.210

Na<135

32 (30.8)

24 (38.7)

8 (19.0)

0.033

K<3.5

13 (12.5)

9 (14.5)

4 (9.5)

0.655

Risk Factors of perioperative CVD after Fractures

The results of the multivariate analysis are shown in Table 5. In the whole sample, age ≥ 80(OR 3.291, 95%CI 1.327–8.161), hip fractures(OR 6.116, 95%CI 1.602–23.334) and cormobidities ≥ 3(OR 2.887, 95%CI 1.137–7.330) were predictors of perioperative CVD in multivariate analysis.

Table 5

Multivariate analysis for the prediction of the perioperative CVD

Model variables

OR

95%CI

p Value

Age ≥ 80

3.291

1.327–8.161

0.01

Hip fracture

6.116

1.602–23.344

0.008

Na<135

2.333

0.798–6.169

0.127

Cormobidities ≥ 3

2.887

1.137–7.330

0.026

Discussion

Fracture and CHF are serious diseases in the adults and result in higher disability, mortality and medical costs[14, 15]. Older patients are particularly prone to multiple complications in the perioperative period, and cardiac complications are often the most serious and can lead to death[16]. For these patients, early preventions should be administered. In this study, we found elderly CHF patients with more comorbidities are prone to perioperative CVD after fracture, the risk factors of perioperative CVD were identified, including age ≥ 80 years, comorbidities ≥ 3 and hip fracture.

We observed characteristics of elderly patients with CHF who developed fractures in our study, and find they were significantly older and had more comorbidities, and were significantly more female than male. More patients were female than male in our study, which is due to the reason that female have a longer life expectancy than male and are more prone to fractures after menopause [17, 18]. Hip fracture was the most common type of fractures in our study. Previous studies have shown that both systolic and diastolic heart failure increase the risk of hip fracture, and heart failure is an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality after hip fracture. Heart failure is divided into HFrEF, HFmrEF, HFpEF according to ejection fraction. Hip fracture incidence and age were higher in the HFpEF group, this result is consistent with other studies [19, 20]. Coronary artery disease was major comorbiditie in patients with CHF[21],this phenomenon was also observed in our study.

BNP is an endogenous cardiac hormone and most commonly used to assess the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with heart failure[22]. CRP is an inflammatory marker, and increased CRP associated with adverse outcomes in patients with CHF[23]. Our previous studies have shown that perioperative heart failure is associated with inflammatory responses and traumatic stress[11]. In our study, BNP and CRP were significantly higher than normal in fracture patients regardless of the type of heart failure. Therefore, we speculate that these patients may have suffered from inflammatory response and perioperative traumatic stress.

Previous studies have shown that complications are an important factor leading to high mortality in elderly patients who develop hip fracture[24, 25]. The results of our study revealed that perioperative risk for the CVD, other complications and death was comparable and similarly elevated in HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF patients. The incidence of CVD was as high as 59.6% in our study. Arrhythmia is the most common complication after non-cardiac surgery, and acute myocardial infarction is the most serious [26]. This is consistent with our findings. A study reported that the presence of HFPEF and HFmREF were predictors of perioperative CVD and mortality in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery[10]. In patients with CHF, pain and anxiety activate the sympathetic nervous system. Increase vasoconstriction and cardiac stress by mediating the release of glucocorticoids and catecholamines, and ultimately lead to perioperative ischemia and myocardial injury.[11], the pre-existing cardiovascular risk may be exacerbated.

The most common complications after fracture were hypoalbuminemia, anemia and electrolyte imbalance in our study. Some research suggested that hypoalbuminemia, anemia, and electrolyte imbalance were also risk factors for perioperative cardiac adverse events in hip fracture patients[27]. Anemia caused by bleeding after fracture can lead to poor oxygen supply to the heart, resulting in increased cardiac contractility and increased oxygen consumption, thereby promoting adverse cardiac events[28]. Electrolyte disturbances can aggravate the susceptibility of the heart to ischemia[29] ,which increase the risk of cardiovascular adverse events. This suggests that we need to focus on the impact of non-cardiac complications on perioperative CVD.

We identify risk factor for perioperative CVD after fracture. Age ≥ 80 years, comorbidities ≥ 3 and hip fractures were associated with increased rates of perioperative CVD. Advanced age is an important risk factor for adverse perioperative events. It has been shown that advanced age was associated with increased risk of CVD[30]. Elder patients are more likely to combine with multiple basic diseases and have reduced tolerance to fracture trauma. The neuroendocrine metabolism and cardiac compensation in the elderly are weaker than those in the young. Therefore, they are prone to perioperative complications. In addition, a study found that the number of comorbidities in elderly hip fracture patients was associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular complications[31]. Interestingly, we found that hip fracture was an independent risk factor for perioperative CVD. Patients with hip fracture have a 2-fold increased cardiovascular risk compared with those without hip fracture[32]. In our study, patients with hip fracture have 6.1 times higher cardiovascular risk than patients with other fracture. For elderly patients with chronic heart failure after hip fracture, we should strengthen management to prevent the occurrence of perioperative CVD.

Limitations

Our study has some limitations worth discussing. First, this is a retrospective study and the inherent limitations of the design seem inevitable. Second, due to the small sample size, there is a possibility of selection bias. The conclusions drawn do not fully and reliably reflect the general clinical features. Third, patients without CHF were not included in our study.

Conclusions

Elderly fracture patients with CHF have many and complex comorbidities, and they are prone to have perioperative CVD and multiple complications under traumatic stress. The management of these patients should be strengthened to reduce stress response and prevent the occurrence of perioperative CVD.

Abbreviations

chronic heart failure CHF; left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF; left ventricular end diastolic diameter LVEDD; left ventricular fractional shortening LEFS; haemoglobin HB; albumin ALB; C-reactive protein CRP; B-type natriuretic peptide BNP.

Declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University. The informed consent was waived for its retrospective nature and the Institutional Review Boards of Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University requested. All authors confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the data will also be used in further research. but are available from are available from Zhiqian Wang on reasonable request.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of 

this paper.

Funding 

None

Author contributions

ZQ.W and ZY.H conceived the study. YQ.Z collected the data and drafted the manuscript. MM.F, JF.G and YQ.Z supported study preparation and data collection. ZQ.W and ZY.H critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements 

None.

References

  1. Zhang C, Feng J, Wang S, Gao P, Xu L, Zhu J, Jia J, Liu L, Liu G, Wang J et al: Incidence of and trends in hip fracture among adults in urban China: A nationwide retrospective cohort study. PLoS medicine 2020, 17(8):e1003180.
  2. Vandenput L, Kindblom JM, Bygdell M, Nethander M, Ohlsson C: Pubertal timing and adult fracture risk in men: A population-based cohort study. PLoS medicine 2019, 16(12):e1002986.
  3. Fei WY, Huo Q, Zhao PQ, Qin LJ, Li T: Magnolol prevents ovariectomy–induced bone loss by suppressing osteoclastogenesis via inhibition of the nuclear factor–κB and mitogen–activated protein kinase pathways. International journal of molecular medicine 2019, 43(4):1669–1678.
  4. Yoo J, Kim S, Choi J, Hwang J: Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screws in patients with trochanteric femur fractures: are rotation control lag screws better than others? Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2019, 14(1):440.
  5. Hu F, Jiang C, Shen J, Tang P, Wang Y: Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 2012, 43(6):676–685.
  6. Cordeiro JM, Calloe K, Moise NS, Kornreich B, Giannandrea D, Di Diego JM, Olesen SP, Antzelevitch C: Physiological consequences of transient outward K + current activation during heart failure in the canine left ventricle. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology 2012, 52(6):1291–1298.
  7. Carbone L, Buzková P, Fink HA, Lee JS, Chen Z, Ahmed A, Parashar S, Robbins JR: Hip fractures and heart failure: findings from the Cardiovascular Health Study. European heart journal 2010, 31(1):77–84.
  8. Cullen MW, Gullerud RE, Larson DR, Melton LJ, 3rd, Huddleston JM: Impact of heart failure on hip fracture outcomes: a population-based study. Journal of hospital medicine 2011, 6(9):507–512.
  9. Norring-Agerskov D, Madsen CM, Bathum L, Pedersen OB, Lauritzen JB, Jørgensen NR, Jørgensen HL: History of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular biomarkers are associated with 30-day mortality in patients with hip fracture. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2019, 30(9):1767–1778.
  10. Açan AE, Özlek B, Kılınç CY, Biteker M, Aydoğan NH: Perioperative outcomes following a hip fracture surgery in elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with a mid-range ejection fraction. Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery: TJTES 2020, 26(4):600–606.
  11. Fu M, Zhang Y, Guo J, Zhao Y, Hou Z, Wang Z, Zhang Y: Application of integrated management bundle incorporating with multidisciplinary measures improved in-hospital outcomes and early survival in geriatric hip fracture patients with perioperative heart failure: a retrospective cohort study. Aging clinical and experimental research 2022.
  12. Keel M, Trentz O: Pathophysiology of polytrauma. Injury 2005, 36(6):691–709.
  13. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Falk V, González-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA et al: 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. European heart journal 2016, 37(27):2129–2200.
  14. Bolton JM, Morin SN, Majumdar SR, Sareen J, Lix LM, Johansson H, Odén A, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA, Leslie WD: Association of Mental Disorders and Related Medication Use With Risk for Major Osteoporotic Fractures. JAMA psychiatry 2017, 74(6):641–648.
  15. Rajapakse CS, Farid AR, Kargilis DC, Jones BC, Lee JS, Johncola AJ, Batzdorf AS, Shetye SS, Hast MW, Chang G: MRI-based assessment of proximal femur strength compared to mechanical testing. Bone 2020, 133:115227.
  16. Zhang LJ, Li N, Li Y, Zeng XT, Liu MY: Cardiac Biomarkers Predicting MACE in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in physiology 2018, 9:1923.
  17. Neale R, Brayne C, Johnson AL: Cognition and survival: an exploration in a large multicentre study of the population aged 65 years and over. International journal of epidemiology 2001, 30(6):1383–1388.
  18. Aggarwal S, Bali K, Dhillon MS, Kumar V, Mootha AK: Displaced proximal humeral fractures: an Indian experience with locking plates. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2010, 5:60.
  19. Hsu JJ, Ziaeian B, Fonarow GC: Heart Failure With Mid-Range (Borderline) Ejection Fraction: Clinical Implications and Future Directions. JACC Heart failure 2017, 5(11):763–771.
  20. Shiga T, Suzuki A, Haruta S, Mori F, Ota Y, Yagi M, Oka T, Tanaka H, Murasaki S, Yamauchi T et al: Clinical characteristics of hospitalized heart failure patients with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fractions in Japan. ESC heart failure 2019, 6(3):475–486.
  21. Roger VL: Epidemiology of heart failure. Circulation research 2013, 113(6):646–659.
  22. Wilker EH, Yeh G, Wellenius GA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Mittleman MA: Ambient temperature and biomarkers of heart failure: a repeated measures analysis. Environmental health perspectives 2012, 120(8):1083–1087.
  23. Kayama Y, Minamino T, Toko H, Sakamoto M, Shimizu I, Takahashi H, Okada S, Tateno K, Moriya J, Yokoyama M et al: Cardiac 12/15 lipoxygenase-induced inflammation is involved in heart failure. The Journal of experimental medicine 2009, 206(7):1565–1574.
  24. Yu L, Zhu Y, Chen W, Bu H, Zhang Y: Incidence and risk factors associated with postoperative stroke in the elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2020, 15(1):429.
  25. Zhang YW, Lu PP, Li YJ, Dai GC, Chen MH, Zhao YK, Cao MM, Rui YF: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Associated Risk Factors of the Elderly with Hip Fractures: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of NHANES 2005–2010. Clinical interventions in aging 2021, 16:177–185.
  26. Smilowitz NR, Beckman JA, Sherman SE, Berger JS: Hospital Readmission After Perioperative Acute Myocardial Infarction Associated With Noncardiac Surgery. Circulation 2018, 137(22):2332–2339.
  27. Lee HP, Chang YY, Jean YH, Wang HC: Importance of serum albumin level in the preoperative tests conducted in elderly patients with hip fracture. Injury 2009, 40(7):756–759.
  28. Wang X, Qiu M, Li J, Wang H, Qi J, Wang G, Xu K, Liu H, Zhao X, Jing Q et al: Impacts of anemia on 3-year ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity-matched study. Journal of thoracic disease 2015, 7(11):1951–1959.
  29. Oniki T, Teshima Y, Nishio S, Ishii Y, Kira S, Abe I, Yufu K, Takahashi N: Hyponatraemia aggravates cardiac susceptibility to ischaemia/reperfusion injury. International journal of experimental pathology 2019, 100(5–6):350–358.
  30. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C et al: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017, 135(10):e146-e603.
  31. Wei J, Zeng L, Li S, Luo F, Xiang Z, Ding Q: Relationship between comorbidities and treatment decision-making in elderly hip fracture patients. Aging clinical and experimental research 2019, 31(12):1735–1741.
  32. Ariza-Vega P, Kristensen MT, Martín-Martín L, Jiménez-Moleón JJ: Predictors of long-term mortality in older people with hip fracture. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2015, 96(7):1215–1221.