Breakage risk of different sacroiliac screws in unilateral sacral fractures A finite element analysis

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1509611/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Breakage risk of different sacroiliac screws in unilateral sacral fractures A finite element analysis

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1509611/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

To compare the risk of breakage of the lengthened sacroiliac screw and ordinary sacroiliac screw to treat unilateral vertical sacral fractures to provide a reference for clinical application. [Methods] A finite element model of Tile C pelvic ring injury (unilateral type Denis Ⅱ fracture of the sacrum) was produced. The sacral fractures were fixed with a lengthened sacroiliac screw and ordinary sacroiliac screw in 6 types of models, respectively. The maximal von Mises stresses and stress distribution of the two kinds of screws in the case of standing on both feet were measured and compared. [Results] The maximal Von Mises stress of lengthened screw is less than that of the ordinary screw. Compared with ordinary screws, the stress distribution in the lengthened screw is more homogeneous. [Conclusions] The breakage risk of screws fixed in double-segment is lower than that of screws fixed in single-segment, the breakage risk of lengthened screws is lower than that of the ordinary screw, and the breakage risk of screws fixed in S2 segment is lower than that of screws fixed in S1 segment.

pelvis

sacral fracture

sacroiliac screw

screw breakage

biomechanics

Unilateral sacral fractures caused by high-energy injuries are rare¹, and most cases are accompanied by posterior ring injuries. Vertical fracture of the sacrum (AO type C3.1) is vertically unstable due to complete disruption of the posterior arch ^2-4and is accompanied by high morbidity and mortality^4,5. Many studies have shown that such fractures cause complications such as malunion, nonunion of bones, neurological dysfunction, low back pain, abnormal gait, and bowel/bladder problems, and surgical treatment can reduce long-term complications ^6-9. Therefore, surgical treatment is necessary at the early stage for cases with unstable sacral fractures. The operation's goal is to reconstruct the stability of the posterior pelvic ring by reducing and fixation of the sacral fracture.

Various methods for vertically unstable sacral injuries have been advocated, including transiliac rods ¹⁰, transiliac plates¹¹, percutaneous iliosacral screws^12,13, and spinopelvic instrumentation ^14,15. In the posterior pelvic ring injuries treatment, sacroiliac screw internal fixation technology is commonly used ¹⁶. Sacroiliac screws have significant biomechanical advantages and minimally invasive percutaneous puncture advantages in treating longitudinal fractures of the sacrum.¹⁷.

To maximize the effect of Sacroiliac screws, We did research^18-20 on the ordinary sacroiliac screw and lengthened sacroiliac screw by radiological anatomical and biomechanical methods. Our previous studies have shown that the fixation effect will be increased when using lengthened sacroiliac screw and fixed the S1 and S2 ^19,20. However, few studies have assessed the breakage risk of lengthened sacroiliac screws and the factors involved in screw breakage. Nevertheless, Whether an increase in screw breakage risk accompanies the increase in screws' length? In other words, What is the relationship between the length of sacroiliac screws and mechanical safety performance? Solving this problem is of great value in guiding the application of sacroiliac screws in unilateral sacral fractures. However, No related studies have been reported.

This study aims to make a biomechanical comparison of two kinds of sacroiliac screws in various modes for fixing unilateral longitudinal sacral fractures using the three-dimensional finite element technique and assess factors involved in screw breakage and provide a theoretical basis for clinical practice.

Finite Element Method²⁰ is adopted in this research，which we established in Our earlier studies. (Fig.1) A vertical 600N was loaded on the superior surface of the sacrum to simulate the standing human. ABAQUS6.9.1 (SIMULIA, USA) software was used to extract mechanical simulation data from all models. We compare and measure the stress distribution and von mises stresses of the two kinds of sacroiliac screws in various modes. Material parameters used in the model as shown in table 1 and table 2. ^21-23

Finite element models were constructed from computed tomography (64-slice spiral CT (Philips)) images from a normal female (36 years old, 170 cm, 63 kg). The slices were 1 mm thick. A virtual 3d model of the sacrum and innominate was created from CT data in DICOM format with image processing software (mimics 10.0). The geometric extents of pelvic cortical and trabecular bones were defined based on The surface mesh. By using four noded linear solid tetrahedral elements with an average edge length of 2 mm, we created an unstructured mesh of bone trabeculae in Abaqus/CAE. A triangular shell element represents the cortical bone surrounding the trabecular bone. The thickness of the shell element is 2mm.²¹

We assumed a tied condition between the inner surface of cortical bone and the surface of trabecular bone. Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio were taken to be 150 N/mm 2 and 0.2 for trabecular bone and 18,000 N/mm 2 and 0.3 for cortical bone¹⁸. The sacroiliac cartilage and interpubic disc were continuum structures occupying the interspace and meshes into hexahedron elements. Binding was used between the sacrum, iliac bone, and sacroiliac joint, respectively, and bilateral pubis and pubic symphysis: sacroiliac ligament, sacrospinous ligament, and attachment regions constructed according to a previous study²⁰. The bilateral hip joint surface is coupled with a rotating center. The center point is constrained by translational degrees of freedom in three directions—simulation of mechanical properties in a standing state.

We cut the sacrum halfway through the right sacral foramina to construct a unilateral sacral fracture(AO type C3.1, Denis II) model. The final finite element normal pelvis and unilateral sacral fracture were printed in Fig. 1. In the simulation, we used two 7.3mm cannulated screws (lengthened sacroiliac screw and sacroiliac screw) placed in either the S1 segment or S2 segment or both S1 and S2 segment in a unilateral sacral fracture model. The material property of the set screw is titanium alloy. Lengthened sacroiliac screw refers to the length of the sacroiliac screw that can pass through the contralateral sacroiliac joint and the contralateral iliac bone. Sacroiliac screws were set in this study to reach the midline of the sacrum. The distal and distal ends of the screw were bonded to the bone tissue to simulate complete osseointegration, and the frictional relationship between the smooth rod part of the screw and the bone tissue was set as sliding.

Six fixation cases were imitated for finite element analysis: ① one lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 segment (L1) ② one lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation in S2 segment (L2) ③ one lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 and S2 segments respectively(L12) ④ one sacroiliac screws fixation in S1 segment (S1) ⑤one sacroiliac screws fixation in S2 segment (S2) ⑥ one sacroiliac screws fixation in S1 and S2 segments respectively (S12) (Fig.2-Fig.7)

Assembly is accomplished by placing constraints between interacting surfaces. These interaction surfaces are located at the bone-implant interface between the sacrum, the sacroiliac cartilage and the ilium, the pubic rami and interpubic disc, and the bone-implant interfaces in the screw thread. In the screw stem regions， Frictionless sliding contact was used between the interaction surfaces of the bone-implant interfaces. We apply a penalty contact with a coefficient of friction of 0.3 on the fracture interaction surface. They were used to simulate sliding patterns between fracture interaction surfaces. The acetabular rotation center was taken as the fixed point to fix the acetabular to simulate the mechanical transfer of bipedal standing.

The results of this study show:

In either model, the stress concentration area of the screw was found in the corresponding screw area of the sacral fracture area.
The stress distribution of the lengthened sacroiliac screw was more homogeneous than that of the ordinary sacroiliac screw.
The screw stress distribution in the model of different fixed segments of the same screw was more concentrated in the fixed single sacral segment than in the fixed two sacral segments.
When both sacral segments were fixed, the distribution of screw stress in the upper segment was more concentrated, and the distribution of screw stress in the next stage was more uniform.
The maximal Von Mises stress of one sacroiliac screw fixation in the S1 or S2 segment was greater than that of one lengthened sacroiliac screws fixation in the same sacral segment,
The maximal Von Mises stress of one sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 and S2 segments, respectively, was greater than that of one lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 and S2 segments, respectively,
The maximal Von Mises stress of one lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 or S2 segments, respectively, was greater than that of one lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 and S2 segments,
The maximal Von Mises stress of one sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 or S2 segments was greater than that of one sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 and S2 segments. (Table3)

Sacral fracture is a common site of pelvic ring injury. The most common type is a unilateral sacral injury with anterior impaction of the sacrum, a lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) injury, which is usually associated with posterior ring instability and requires clinical treatment. Sacroiliac screw is a conventional internal fixation technique for posterior pelvic ring injury¹⁶. Sacroiliac screws are commonly used to stabilize the posterior ring. However, some clinical studies have raised that conventional sacroiliac screw fixation may not provide sufficient stability universally. Keating et al. ²⁴ applied the sacroiliac screws to achieve 84% anatomic or near-anatomic reduction of pelvic fractures, but the final malunion rate was 44%. Damian et al.¹² showed that sacroiliac screws are clinically unreliable for vertical sacrum fractures. More recently, lengthened sacroiliac screws have come into use^{29 30}. Our paper described it as a "lengthened sacroiliac screw." The screw is inserted from the external surface of the ilium across the contralateral sacroiliac joint and exits the ilium. Gardner et al. ²⁵ described the advantages and theoretical basis of using a lengthened sacroiliac screw. First, Lengthening sacroiliac screws has the characteristics of better vertical shear load distribution, lower tip stress, and resistance to displacement. Second, in addition to the absolute length of the screw, the lengthened sacroiliac screw allows for more threads to bind to the bone, which may increase holding power. Third, lengthened sacroiliac screw provides anchorage in the iliac cortical bone, which may increase the role of the screw in maintaining reduction. Our sacral fractures based on biomechanical investigations^19,20 showed that the lengthened sacroiliac screws provide better stability than ordinary screws. However, it was not previously reported whether an increased risk of breakage accompanies the application of lengthened sacroiliac screw.

The maximum Von Mises stress, one of the fundamental safety indicators of screws, increased with the increase of screw fracture risk. The higher the stress, the greater the likelihood of screw failure. The following results can be summarized from this study. When comparing different fixation modes with the same kind of screws, we found that the maximum Von Mises stress was the largest, with only fixed S1 segments, and the minor model, with only fixed S2 segments. At least in the model, S1 and S2 are both fixed. Secondly, when fixing the S1 segment and S2 segment simultaneously, the maximum Von Mises stress of the S1 segment screw in the same model was similar to that of the S2 segment screw, regardless of whether it was a lengthened screw model or an ordinary screw model. Thirdly, if considered from the fixed segment, the screw fracture risk of double segment fixation was lower than that of single-segment fixation. In double-segment fixation, the fracture risk of the two screws was similar. When different screws were used to compare the same fixed segment, we found that the maximal Von Mises stress of the lengthened screw was lower than that of the ordinary screw, and the lengthened screw had a lower fracture risk than the ordinary screw.

In summary, from the perspective of screw safety, it is recommended to use lengthened screws for fixation. The safest method is to fix the S1 and S2 segments with extended sacroiliac screws. Normal sacroiliac screws are recommended for S1 and S2, even in the absence of lengthening sacroiliac screws. If only one screw can be used, S2 segment fixation is recommended regardless of the sacroiliac screw. The results of the screw safety analysis are consistent with those of the stability analysis.

The risk of a fatigue fracture in internal fixation can be reduced by avoiding excessive concentration in certain parts through the uniform distribution of stress in internal fixation. However, in this study, When we compared the stress distribution, we found that the stress distribution of screws was not uniform in any models. Compared with the different kinds of screws we used, the stress distribution of the lengthened sacroiliac screw was more uniform. Compared with different fixed segments, the stress distribution of double-segment fixed screws was more uniform. Similarly, these findings are consistent with the stability analysis results and the maximum von mises stress analysis.

The following points need to be pointed out in this study. Firstly, Although anterior ring instability is characteristic of type C pelvic ring injuries, considering the multiple fixation methods of anterior ring fractures may affect the stability of the posterior pelvic ring. This study did not imitate the anterior pelvic ring's injury and fixation but only maintained the anterior pelvic ring's normal state. The anterior pelvic ring had a slight effect on the stability of the posterior pelvic ring and did not affect our comparison of several study models. Secondly, to best simulate pelvic stability, we reserved multiple important pelvic ligaments in our research.Meanwhile, to eliminate any unpredictable forces that might affect the measurements, we did not simulate muscles to simulate the extra stability they would cause. Muscle parameters, joint data parameters, and joint flexibility Settings will qualitatively influence the results. However, the calculation is too complicated to complete the experiment, so they are simplified. ²⁶²⁷Thirdly, it was not feasible to simulate all the features of comminuted sacral fractures accurately. In our study, we used a well-accepted method to imitate a unilateral sacral sagittal fracture through the unilateral sacral foramen, which is considered the typical type of simulated sacral fracture (Denis II).Moreover, our model method had a straight and smooth fracture, which facilitated the standardization of the model and did not affect the accuracy of mesh generation and subsequent calculation. Fourthly, to best mimic the normal state of the pelvis while standing, we position the pelvis so that the upper surface of the symphysis pubis is aligned with the lower surface of the sacrum. Fifthly, the finite element model we studied was bone independent, and our conclusions were theoretically applied to patients who still have cartilage.

The breakage risk of screws fixed in double-segment is lower than that of screws fixed in single-segment, the breakage risk of lengthened screws is lower than that of the ordinary screw, and the breakage risk of screws fixed in S2 segment is lower than that of screws fixed in S1 segment.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81641171 & No. 81301553), Key R&D Program of Shandong Province (No. 2018GSF118064), Project of Medical and Health Technology Development Program of Shandong Province, China (No.202104070173 ), Young and Middle-Aged Scientists Research Awards Foundation of Shandong Province, China (No. BS2013SF015), Science & Technology Innovation Development Project of Yantai City, China(No.2021MSGY049 &No.2021YT06000877)

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due the finite element model belongs to the subject but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Affiliations

1.Orthopaedics Department, Yantai Shan Hospital, 91#, Jiefang Road, Yantai, 264008, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China

Yupeng Ma, Yong Zhao, Dexin Zou, Shengjie Dong, Xiujiang Sun, Gong Cheng, Yuchi Zhao,Tao Sun, Dan Wang,Shudong Zhang,

2.CT/MR Department, Yantai Shan Hospital, 91#, Jiefang Road, Yantai, 264008, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China

Wei Lan

Contributions

YPM and YZ designed and participated in the whole process of the study and drafted the manuscript. WL, DXZ, YCZ, XJS, and GC carried out the experimental operating. TS and WL participated in the data collection. DXZ and SJD performed the statistical analysis. DW and SDZ participated in the study coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Zhao

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.The ethics committee of Yantai Shan Hospital approved the study. Informed consents were obtained from individual participant included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Nork, S. E., Jones, C. B., Harding, S. P., Mirza, S. K. & Routt, M. L., Jr. Percutaneous stabilization of U-shaped sacral fractures using iliosacral screws: technique and early results. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 15, 238-246 (2001).
Marsh, J. L.et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 21, S1-133 (2007).
Tile, M. Acute Pelvic Fractures: I. Causation and Classification. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 4, 143-151 (1996).
HC, S. Pelvic ring fractures in Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults.(ed.Bucholz RW, CourtBrown CM, Heckman JD, Tornetta PIII) 7th edn, 1415–1462 (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2009).
Egol KE, K. K., Zuckerman JD. Pelvis fracture in Hand book of fractures. (ed. Egol KE, Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD) 4th edn, 327–343 (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2010).
Carlson, D. A., Scheid, D. K., Maar, D. C., Baele, J. R. & Kaehr, D. M. Safe placement of S1 and S2 iliosacral screws: the "vestibule" concept. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 14, 264-269 (2000).
Cole, J. D., Blum, D. A. & Ansel, L. J. Outcome after fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 160-179 (1996).
Failinger, M. S. & McGanity, P. L. Unstable fractures of the pelvic ring. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 74, 781-791 (1992).
Matta, J. M., Dickson, K. F. & Markovich, G. D. Surgical treatment of pelvic nonunions and malunions. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 199-206 (1996).
Gorczyca, J. T.et al. The strength of iliosacral lag screws and transiliac bars in the fixation of vertically unstable pelvic injuries with sacral fractures. Injury 27, 561-564 (1996).
Ayoub, M. A. Vertically unstable sacral fractures with neurological insult: outcomes of surgical decompression and reconstruction plate internal fixation. International orthopaedics 33, 261-267, doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0468-9 (2009).
Griffin, D. R., Starr, A. J., Reinert, C. M., Jones, A. L. & Whitlock, S. Vertically unstable pelvic fractures fixed with percutaneous iliosacral screws: does posterior injury pattern predict fixation failure? Journal of orthopaedic trauma 17, 399-405 (2003).
Ayoub, M. A. Type C pelvic ring injuries in polytrauma patients: can percutaneous iliosacral screws reduce morbidity and costs? European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology 22, 137-144, doi:10.1007/s00590-011-0811-0 (2012).
Jones, C. B., Sietsema, D. L. & Hoffmann, M. F. Can lumbopelvic fixation salvage unstable complex sacral fractures? Clinical orthopaedics and related research 470, 2132-2141, doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2273-z (2012).
Ayoub, M. A. Displaced spinopelvic dissociation with sacral cauda equina syndrome: outcome of surgical decompression with a preliminary management algorithm. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 21, 1815-1825, doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2406-9 (2012).
Osterhoff, G., Ossendorf, C., Wanner, G. A., Simmen, H. P. & Werner, C. M. Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation in S1 and S2 for posterior pelvic ring injuries: technique and perioperative complications. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 131, 809-813, doi:10.1007/s00402-010-1230-0 (2011).
Zhang, L.et al. An Effective and Feasible Method, "Hammering Technique," for Percutaneous Fixation of Anterior Column Acetabular Fracture. BioMed research international 2016, 7151950, doi:10.1155/2016/7151950 (2016).
Zhao, Y., Li, J., Wang, D. & Lian, W. Parameters of lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation: a radiological anatomy study. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 21, 1807-1814, doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2367-z (2012).
Zhao, Y.et al. Comparison of stability of two kinds of sacro-iliac screws in the fixation of bilateral sacral fractures in a finite element model. Injury 43, 490-494, doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.12.023 (2012).
Zhao, Y.et al. Mechanical comparison between lengthened and short sacroiliac screws in sacral fracture fixation: a finite element analysis. Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR 99, 601-606, doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2013.03.023 (2013).
Phillips, A. T., Pankaj, P., Howie, C. R., Usmani, A. S. & Simpson, A. H. Finite element modelling of the pelvis: inclusion of muscular and ligamentous boundary conditions. Medical engineering & physics 29, 739-748, doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.08.010 (2007).
Dakin, G. J.et al. Elastic and viscoelastic properties of the human pubic symphysis joint: effects of lateral impact joint loading. Journal of biomechanical engineering 123, 218-226 (2001).
Garcia, J. M.et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of several internal and external pelvis fixations. Journal of biomechanical engineering 122, 516-522 (2000).
Keating, J. F.et al. Early fixation of the vertically unstable pelvis: the role of iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior lesion. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 13, 107-113 (1999).
Gardner, M. J. & Routt, M. L., Jr. Transiliac-transsacral screws for posterior pelvic stabilization. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 25, 378-384, doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e47fad (2011).
Paranjape S , Singhania N . Effect of Body Positions on Quadriceps Angle Measurement[J]. Sci Medicine Journal, 2019, 1(1):20-24.
doi：10.28991/SciMedJ-2019-0101-3
Ettefagh MH , Naraghi M , Towhidkhah F . Position Control of a Flexible Joint via Explicit Model Predictive Control: An Experimental Implementation[J]. Emerging Science Journal, 2019, 3(3):146-156. doi：10.28991/esj-2019-01177

Table.1 model parameters of pelvic ligaments

Ligament	K(N/m)	Number of springs
anterior and capsule	700	27
posterior (inner layer)	1400	15
intro-osseus	2800	8
sacrospinous	1400	9
sacrotuberous	1500	15
superior pubic	500	24
arcuate pubic	500	24

Table.2 model parameters of various kinds of material

	Young’s modulus(MPa)	Poisson’s ratio	Element Type
cortical bone	18000	0.3	shell element
trabecular bone	150	0.2	tetrahedral element
sacroiliac cartilage	1000	0.3	hexahedral element
interpubic disc	5	0.45	hexahedral element
screw	114000	0.3	hexahedral element

Table 3. the maximal Von Mises stress of screws (MPa)

	S1 segment	S2 segment
L1	55.61
L2		49.61
L12	36.98	38.85
	S1 segment	S2 segment
S1	70.49
S2		50.77
S12	46.49	44.14

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
25 Jul, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
27 Jun, 2022
Reviews received at journal
25 Jun, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
25 Jun, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
18 Apr, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
09 Apr, 2022
Editor invited by journal
01 Apr, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
01 Apr, 2022
First submitted to journal
31 Mar, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Breakage risk of different sacroiliac screws in unilateral sacral fractures A finite element analysis

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussions

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Tables

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1