Characterization of Chionanthus retusus fruits: contents and composition of oil, fatty acids, phytosterols, and tocopherols

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1512199/v1

Abstract

Chionanthus retusus is a deciduous shrub or small tree in the Oleaceae with important ornamental and economic value. In this study, fruits were collected from 22 individual C. retusus plants to study their morphological characteristics, oil content, and the contents and composition of fatty acids, phytosterols, and tocopherol. The average fruit fresh biomass, grain dry biomass, kernel dry biomass, and kernel percentage were 76.432 ± 20.75 g, 24.370 ± 6.52 g, 12.122 ± 3.21 g, and 50.16%, respectively. The average oil content of the kernels was 36.55%, ranging between 28.90% and 47.50%.The average total phytosterols content was 280.33 ± 43.96 mg/100 g. The average total tocopherols content was 578.31 ± 101.29 µg/g. In correlation analyses, the oil content was negatively correlated with the total phytosterols content (r = − 0.653, P < 0.01) and positively correlated with kernel weight (r = 0.762, P < 0.01). In principal component analyses, the first two principal components explained 77.1%,72.2%, and 91.2% of the total variance of fatty acid, phytosterol, and tocopherol composition, respectively. These results allowed us to identify germplasm resources with high oil yield, high oleic acid content, high phytosterol content, and high tocopherol content.

Introduction

Chionanthus retusus is a deciduous shrub or small tree in the Oleaceae family. C. retusus is widely distributed in East Asia, and is an excellent landscaping tree species. It is resistant to saline, alkaline, and low-nutrient soils, and shows strong adaptability. Because this species produces a variety of bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, it also has a high practical value. Previous reports have elucidated the chemical components of C. retusus flowers and leaves[1, 2]. C. retusus flowers contain flavonoids and lignans that have significant therapeutic effects against a range of inflammatory and neurological diseases [3]. The buds, leaves, roots, and bark of C. retusus contain glycosides, coumarins, and polysaccharides that have important medicinal value. Thus, this plant is recognized as a medicinal plant [4]. Because the flowers, leaves, and fruits of C. retusus contain phenols and other compounds with antioxidant activity, they can effectively remove free radicals. Extracts from this plant are used as a functional ingredient in foods. Most previous studies on the chemical components of tassels have focused on the flowers and leaves, while little is known about the components of the seeds. Chien (2004) studied changes in the contents of volatile components and nutrients in seeds during germination [5], but no previous studies have explored changes in the secondary metabolite contents and composition in the seeds of C. retusus. In this study, the contents and composition of fatty acids, phytosterols, and tocopherols (tocopherols) in oil extracted from C. retusus kernels were determined to establish whether C. retusus has potential as an oil crop.

Plant oils contain a variety of fatty acids, most of which are unsaturated fatty acids, therefore, compared with animal fats, plant oils are better for human health. Unsaturated fatty acids include oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid, with the latter two produced only by plants. Because they cannot synthesized by the human body and must be obtained from the diet, they are known as essential fatty acids [6, 7]. Unsaturated fatty acids play a very important role in human physiological processes and are essential nutrients for growth [8]. Studies have shown that many unsaturated fatty acids can reduce cholesterol, regulate blood lipids, reduce blood viscosity, and improve immunity [9]. Oleic acid can reduce the amount of total cholesterol and low-density cholesterol (harmful cholesterol) in human blood to a certain extent, while maintaining the levels of high-density cholesterol (beneficial cholesterol), which is conducive to reducing blood lipid levels. Thus, it can effectively prevent or ameliorate cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases [10, 11]. Linolenic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid can improve the activity of brain cells and play a role in the development of retina and nerve tissue [12, 13]. Unsaturated fatty acids such as linoleic acid and linolenic acid can also enhance human immune function, reduce the production of proinflammatory factors, prevent infarction, and inhibit allergic reactions [1421].

Phytosterols are plant metabolites in the triterpene family, with a structure similar to that of cholesterol. They are essential biomolecules for human health that must be obtained from food [2224]. Vegetable oils and cereals are the best natural sources of dietary phytosterols [25]. Phytosterols have been shown to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease through effectively reducing cholesterol absorption [26, 27]. They also have anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic properties [28, 29]. Tocopherols is a fat-soluble compound that is important for human health. It cannot be synthesized by humans and animals, so it must be obtained from the diet [30]. Among several natural types of tocopherols, α-tocopherol has the highest absorption and metabolism efficiency in the human body, while γ-tocopherol has the strongest antioxidant capacity [31]. Tocopherols can reduce the incidence of cancer, cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, nervous system disease, and lung disorders [3234]. It can also delay human aging and protect against ultraviolet radiation [3537].

C. retusus is used as a traditional Chinese medicine to treat inflammation and heatstroke[1]. Although C. retusus contains a variety of phytochemicals, there are few reports on these compounds in its seeds. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively analyze the seeds of different C. retusus accessions to determine their contents and composition of fatty acids, phytosterols, and tocopherols. In this work, we assessed the variability of berry morphology, oil content, and fatty acids, phytosterols, and tocopherols contents and composition among different C. retusus accessions. The relationships among berry morphology, fatty acid composition, and contents of oil, phytosterols, and tocopherols in the seed kernels of C. retusus accessions were analyzed. The results will facilitate the selection of high-quality edible oil varieties of C. retusus to promote an oil industry based on this species in China.

Materials And Methods

Plant materials

Shandong Province is the main distribution area of ancient C. retusus trees in China. Therefore 22 superior and ancient trees of C. retusus with high yield and vigorous growth were selected for these analyses. The trees were growing in the cities of Anqiu, Yinyuan, Qingzhou, Tai’an, and Zibo in Shandong Province (Table A1, Appendix A). In late August 2020, approximately 2 kg mature fruits were collected from each grafted accession. The fruits were picked randomly from different infructescences in the crown to ensure that the samples were representative. First, the fruit morphology parameters were measured (fresh weight, transverse diameter, and longitudinal diameter), and then the pulp was removed and seeds of each accession were dried to constant weight at 65 °C.

Grain morphology

For measurements of morphological parameters, 300 undamaged fruits were randomly selected from each C. retusus accession. The fresh weight of fruit was determined as the weight of 100 seeds, accurate to 0.001 g. This measurement was repeated three times. After removing the pulp from the fruit, the grains were dried at 65 °C and the weight of 100 grains was determined, accurate to 0.001 g. This measurement was repeated three times. The kernels were then removed from the seeds, and the weight of the kernels and seed shells were separately determined for 100 grains, accurate to 0.001 g. This measurement was repeated three times. The fruit characters (fruit vertical diameter, FVD; fruit transverse diameter, FTD; fruit shape index, FSI) and the kernel characters (grain vertical diameter, GVD; grain transverse diameter, GTD; shell thickness, ST) were measured to the nearest 0.001 mm. Fruit shape index(FSI) is the ratio of fruit vertical diameter(FVD) to fruit transverse diameter(FTD). Kernel percentage (Kp) was calculated as the ratio of kernel dry biomass to grain dry biomass. The values of the grain morphological traits are reported as mean ± standard deviation.

Oil extraction

Oil was extracted using the Soxhlet method according to the Chinese National Standard (GB, 5009.6–,2016). For each C. retusus accession, approximately 5 g kernels was crushed into a powder and then subjected to Soxhlet extraction using petroleum ether (boiling point 30–60 °C) as the solvent at 60 °C for 8–10 h. After solvent evaporation, the flask containing oil was dried at 105 °C, cooled in a desiccator, and reweighed. Oil extraction was conducted in triplicate, and the data are reported as mean ± standard deviation.

Fatty acid determination

Fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatography (GC) according to the Chinese National Standard (GB, 5009.168–, 2016). Saponification of fat and methyl esterification of fatty acids was conducted by adding 8 mL 2% sodium hydroxide methanol solution to the fat extract. The mixture was refluxed in a water bath at 80 °C until the oil droplets disappeared; then, 7 mL 15% boron trifluoride methanol solution was added and the mixture was refluxed for 2 min. It was then rapidly cooled to room temperature; 10–30 mL n-heptane was added, and the mixture was shaken for 2 min. Saturated sodium chloride solution was added, followed by static layering. Then, 3–5 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate was added to approximately 5 mL of the n-heptane extraction supernatant solution. The mixture was shaken for 1 min, followed by static layering for 5 min. Finally, the upper layer of the solution was transferred into an injection vial for determination. The fatty acid methyl esters obtained from each C. retusus oil sample were analyzed using an Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph (GC) (Agilent Technologies, Little Falls, DE, USA) fitted with a flame ionization detector and equipped with a DM-2560 capillary column (100 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.2 μm film thickness). The injector and detector were programmed at 100 °C, increasing at 10 °C min−1 to 180 °C, then at 1 °C min−1 to 200 °C, and then at 4 °C min−1 to 230 °C for 10.5 min. The flow rate of the carrier gas (nitrogen) was 1.0 mL min−1 and the split ratio was 1:100. Fatty acids were identified by comparing retention times with those of standard samples (Supelco 37 FAME mix, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) and their percentage was calculated according to the area of each peak. Each determination was run in triplicate. Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation.

Phytosterols determination

Phytosterols were determined using a GC according to the Chinese National Standard (GB/T 25223, 1999). The oil sample was saponified with ethanolic potassium hydroxide solution. The unsaponifiable sterol fraction was separated by thin-layer chromatography on a sheet of aluminum foil coated with a thin layer of alumina. Separation and quantification of the silanized sterol fraction were carried out by capillary GC on an Agilent 7890B (Agilent Technologies) instrument equipped with an SE-45 capillary column (length, 50 m; i.d.,0.25 mm; film thickness, 0.1 μm). The working conditions were as follows: injector at 320 °C; initial column temperature at 240 °C, increasing at 4 °C min−1 to 255 °C; sample injection volume, 1 μL; flow rate, 36 cm/s; split ratio 1:20; carrier gas, hydrogen. Phytosterols were identified by comparing retention times with those of standard samples (Betulin, Supelco). These analyses were conducted in triplicate. Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation.

Tocopherols determination

The contents and composition of tocopherols were determined using a GC according to the Chinese National Standard (GB/T5009, 82-2016). Each C. retusus kernel sample was ground into a powder, then 0.2 g was placed in a test tube before adding 0.05 g vitamin C and 4 mL 80% ethanol solution. The mixture was shaken and mixed thoroughly, then subjected to ultrasonic treatment in a low-temperature water bath for 30 min before adding 8 mL n-hexane solution. The mixture was then centrifuged and the supernatant was passed through a 0.22-μM organic phase filter membrane. Tocopherols were identified by comparing retention times with those of standard samples (Betulin, Supelco). Each determination was run in triplicate. Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation.

2.7 Statistical analyses

Data for fruit characters, kernel characters, yield, Kp, contents of oil, sterols, and tocopherols, and fatty acid and sterols composition were subjected to analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test using IBM SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated to detect relationships among grain morphological characters, fatty acid composition, and oil, phytosterols, and tocopherols contents. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using SAS 9.2 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results And Discussion

Fruit morphological diversity

The use of morphological characteristics as phenotypic indicators is important for estimating phenotypic diversity and selecting clonal varieties [38, 39]. The data for fruit characters (fresh weight, FVD, FTD, FSI), kernel characters (grain dry weight, GVD, GTD, ST, GVD/ST), and yield (kernel dry weight, kernel shell dry weight) are summarized in Table 1. The values of morphological characters differed significantly among the 22 C. retusus accessions (P < 0.05). The mean value for fruit fresh biomass was 76.432 ± 20.75 g, ranging from 49.240 ± 0.94 g (B-1) to 121.303 ± 7.51 g (T-8) with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 27.15%. The mean value of grain dry biomass was 24.370 ± 6.52 g, ranging from 10.085 ± 0.94 g (WS-2) to 36.067±0.98 g (T-8) with a CV of 26.75%. The mean value of kernel dry biomass was 12.122 ± 3.21 g, ranging from 7.751 ± 0.54 g (WS-2) to 16.665 ± 1.80 g (T-8) with a CV of 26.52%. The mean values of FVD, FTD, GVD, and GTD were 12.462 ± 1.39 mm, 9.742 ± 1.04 mm, 10.732 ± 1.51 mm, and 6.831 ± 0.65 mm, respectively. C. retusus kernels contain oil and important metabolites, and they are the main organ used by the processing industry. Therefore, Kp is a major economic indicator. The average value for Kp was 50.16%, ranging from 39.90% to 62.59% (Fig. 1). The maximum Kp was in T-2 (62.59%), and this value was significantly higher than those in other accessions (P < 0.05).

Oil contents and fatty acid composition

We analyzed the oil content in the kernels of 22 C. retusus accessions (Table 2). The mean oil content in the kernels of 22 C. retusus accessions was 36.55% ± 5.78%, with a range from 28.3% ± 0.35% (S-3) to 47.5% ± 0.67% (WS-5) and a CV of 15.81% (Table 2). The accession WS-5 had the highest oil content (47.5% ± 0.67%) and S-3 had the lowest (28.3% ± 0.35%), which was not significantly different from those of B-1 (28.9% ± 0.58%), WA-1 (29.0% ± 0.45%), and S-2 (29.2% ± 0.38%) (Table 2). These differences in oil content may be due to variations among accessions and differences in their genetic background [40].

Fatty acid composition is an important index of oil quality. Analyses of the fatty acid composition of vegetable oil from 22 C. retusus kernels revealed seven main fatty acid constituents (Table 2). The most abundant fatty acid was oleic acid (C18:1), accounting for 49.53% ± 0.06% to 59.67% ± 0.15% of total fatty acids (average, 52.33% ± 3.22%); followed by linoleic acid (C18:2) (range, 27.00% ± 0.80% to 34.80% ± 0.51%; average, 31.31% ± 3.28%); palmitic acid (C16:0) (range, 3.41% ± 0.02% to 5.09% ± 0.02%; average, 4.30% ± 0.49%); stearic acid (C18:0) (range, 1.45% ± 0.01% to 2.88% ± 0.01%; average, 2.12% ± 0.39%); linolenic acid (C18:3) (range, 0.34% ± 0.03% to 0.51% ± 0.05%; average 0.42% ± 0.05%); arachidonic acid (C20:1) (range, 0.26% ± 0.03% to 0.40% ± 0.04%; average, 0.36% ± 0.08%); and arachidic acid (C20:0) (range, 0.12% ± 0.03% to 0.21% ± 0.04%; average, 0.15% ± 0.03%). Notably, arachidonic acid (C20:0) was only detected in the WA, WS, and S accessions. Compared with saturated fatty acids, unsaturated fatty acids are better for human health. Therefore, the content of unsaturated fatty acids is often used as a quality standard for vegetable oil [21]. According to the number of double bonds in the molecule, fatty acids can be categorized into three groups: saturated fatty acids (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) The mean value for SFA was 6.49% ± 0.78%, ranging from 5.13% ± 0.06% (S-6) to 7.64% ± 0.20% (B-1) with a CV of 12.02%. The mean value for MUFA was 52.33% ± 3.23%, ranging from 49.87% ± 0.11% (S-3) to 60.00% ± 0.18% (Z-5) with a CV of 6.17%. The mean value for PUFA was 31.88% ± 3.26%, ranging from 27.39% ± 0.83% (S-6) to 35.14±0.53% (WS-3) with a CV of 10.22% (Table 2). Thus, the main component of vegetable oil from C. retusus kernels was unsaturated fatty acids, accounting for 80.55% ± 0.43% to 91.84% ± 0.29%. These findings indicate that C. retusus has potential as a high-quality oil crop.

Individual fatty acids have their own specific properties, and they can alter metabolism, gene expression, responsiveness to hormones, and patterns of secondary metabolite production [19]. Unsaturated fatty acids play an important role in human body. They can reduce cholesterol, regulate blood lipids, and enhance immunity [9]. The unsaturated fatty acids content is one of the important indexes for woody oil crops. In fact, the main goal for peanut breeding is to produce varieties with high levels of oleic acid [41]. In this study, the average proportion of unsaturated fatty acids in oil from kernels of C. retusus was 88.51%, which is equivalent to the content of unsaturated fatty acids in oils from common woody oil crops such as olive (89.72%), Camellia oleifera (83.48%), and Acer truncatum (91.71%) [42-44]. Our analyses indicate that the main unsaturated fatty acid in C. retusus kernels is oleic acid (55.17% of total fatty acids). Thus, C. retusus is a woody oil crop with a high oleic acid content. Oleic acid is the most important unsaturated fatty acid. It is a monounsaturated fatty acid that can reduce cholesterol levels in serum, thereby ameliorating or preventing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases [45, 46]. Oleic acid can reduce the concentrations of total cholesterol and low-density cholesterol (harmful cholesterol) in human blood to a certain extent, while maintaining the concentration of high-density cholesterol (beneficial cholesterol) [10, 11]. In 2018, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued food health guidelines allowing for edible oil with an oleic acid content of > 70% to state, “20 g per day can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease” on the product label [41]. In this study, the oleic acid contents in kernels were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in WS-2 (59.58% ± 0.08%), WS-3 (59.40% ± 0.10%), and WS-5 (59.73% ± 0.18%) than in the other tested accessions (Table 2). Thus, our results identify WS-2, WS-3, and WS-5 as excellent germplasm resources with a high oleic acid content. 

Linoleic acid is a biosynthetic precursor of γ-linolenic acid and arachidonic acid, particularly in the skin. The deficiency of this essential fatty acid results in the breakdown of skin integrity and an inability to prevent transdermal water loss [19]. Linoleic acid lowers blood cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, particularly when it replaces common saturated fatty acids [47, 48]. Other fatty acids detected in C. retusus kernels were linolenic acid (0.42% ± 0.05%), arachidonic acid (0.15% ± 0.03%), and arachidonic acid (0.36% ± 0.08%), all of which can enhance human immune function, reduce pro-inflammatory factors, prevent infarction, and inhibit allergic reactions [14-21]. The ratio of saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids in oil from C. retusus kernels was 6:55:33, similar to the composition of rapeseed oil and olive oil. Thus, the oil from C. retusus kernels is a potential edible vegetable oil.

Phytosterols composition

Table 3 shows the total phytosterols content and phytosterols composition of oil from the kernels of 22 C. retusus accessions. The total phytosterol content in oil from tested accessions varied significantly at P < 0.05, ranging from 225.71 ± 1.21 mg/100 g (S-5) to 360.59 ± 1.54 mg/100 g (WA-2) with a mean value of 280.33 ± 43.96 mg/100 g and a CV of 15.68%. Among more than 250 different phytosterols found in plants, the most common ones are β-sitosterol, campesterol, and stigmasterol [22, 24]. Capillary GC analyses of C. retusus phytosterols revealed seven phytosterols, with β-sitosterol as the dominant compound (average, 191.14 ± 28.51 mg/100 g; range, 155.93 ± 6.67 mg/100 g (T-10) to 240.67 ± 1.07 mg/100 g (WA-2)), followed by β-sitostanol (average, 36.37 ± 4.56 mg/100 g; range, 31.66 ± 0.02 mg/100 g (B-2) to 49.65 ± 0.64 mg/100 g (T-8). The other detected phytosterols were campestanol (range, 12.09–42.90 mg/100 g), campesteranol (range, 10.07–19.30 mg/100 g), campesterol (10.99–22.95 mg/100 g), and Δ5, 24-stigmasterol (range, 2.26–9.87 mg/100 g) (Table 3). This is the first report of the phytosterols content and profile in C. retusus oil. Although some studies have shown that dietary phytosterols can lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, others have shown that the consumption of phytosterols reduces the absorption and plasma concentrations of some fat-soluble vitamins and antioxidants [49]. The FDA tentatively issued a health claim related to phytosterol consumption and coronary heart disease risk; that is, the daily dietary intake to achieve the claimed effect of phytosterols is 2 g per day [50]. The phytosterol content was much higher in C. retusus oil than in oils of olive (Olea europaea L. subsp. Oleaster) (206.82 mg/100 g), yellow horn (Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge) (185.3 mg/100 g), and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) (135 mg/100 g) [51-53]. Thus, C. retusus oil has potential as a functional ingredient to produce foods enriched with phytosterols. 

Tocopherols content and composition

This is the first report on the content and composition of tocopherols in C. retusus oil. The total tocopherols content and composition in oil varied significantly (P < 0.05) among the 22 C. retusus accessions (Table 4). The average tocopherols content in oil across the 22 C. retusus samples was 578.31 ± 58.66 µg/g, ranging from 480.94 ± 2.11 µg/g (Z-1) to 654.22 ± 1.94 µg/g (T-10), with a CV of 10.14%. Tocopherols is a viscous oily light yellow substance that is soluble in organic solvents. Tocopherols can be classified into eight types according to the saturation of the chain and the number and position of methyl groups. In vegetable oil, tocopherols mainly exists in the form of tocopherols [54]. Among several natural tocopherols, α-tocopherol has the highest absorption and metabolic efficiency in the human body, while γ-tocopherol has the strongest antioxidant capacity [31]. In this study, the types of tocopherols in the 22 C. retusus samples were determined by liquid chromatography. Four tocopherols were detected in C. retusus oil, with γ-tocopherol being the most abundant (526.90 ± 51.36 µg/g) followed by α-tocopherol (34.1 ± 7.56 µg/g). The concentrations of δ-tocopherol and β-tocopherol were 9.60 ± 3.05 and 7.50 ± 1. µg/g, respectively. Tocopherols helps to prevent or ameliorate a variety of major human diseases, such as cancers, cardiovascular diseases, eye disease, and nervous system diseases [32-34, 55, 56]. The main source of tocopherols in the human body is vegetable oils in the diet [30]. The FDA recommends that adults should consume 30 mg tocopherols per day [57]. Some studies have shown that the absorption of 7–9 mg α-tocopherol per day can ensure the normal function of the human central nervous system and vascular system, and the absorption of 100–1000 mg α-tocopherol per day can delay human aging and protect against ultraviolet radiation [35]. Our analyses show that the tocopherols content is higher in C. retusus oil than in oils from soybean (Glycine max (Linn.) Merr.) (285 µg/g), olive (O. europaea L.) (347.5 µg/g), and C. oleifera (280 µg/g) [37, 58, 59]. Thus, C. retusus oil has potential applications as an ingredient to produce fortified foods enriched with tocopherols.

Correlations among fruit morphology, fatty acid composition, and oil, phytosterol, and tocopherols contents

Spearman’s correlation coefficients between fruit morphology, oil content, SFA, MUFA, PUFA, and total phytosterols content in 22 C. retusus accessions are shown in Table 5. The fruit fresh weight was significantly positively correlated with FTD (r=0.589, P < 0.01), FSI (r = 0.902, P < 0.01), GVD (r = 0.907, P < 0.01), GVD/ST (r = 0.810, P < 0.01), kernel weight (r=0.794, P < 0.01), and kernel rate (r = 0.790, P < 0.01). The FTD was significantly positively correlated with FSI (r =0.448, P < 0.05), grain weight (r=0.566, P < 0.01), GVD (r=0.663, P < 0.01), GTD (r=0.953, P < 0.01), and GVD/ST (r=0.556, P < 0.01). The FSI was positively correlated with GVD (r=0.787, P < 0.01), GVD/ST (r=0.844, P < 0.01), and kernel rate (r=758, P < 0.01); and negatively correlated with grain weight (r=0.478, P < 0.05). A very significant positive correlation between GVD/ST and kernel rate (r= 0.763, P < 0.01) was detected. These results indicated that fruit fresh weight would be a useful selection trait for high kernel dry biomass and high kernel rate in C. retusus breeding. Regarding oil, phytosterols, and tocopherols contents, the total oil content was negatively correlated with the total phytosterols content (r= −0.653, P < 0.01) and positively correlated with kernel weight (r=0.762, P < 0.01). We detected very significant negative correlations between SFA and PUFA (r=−0.561, P < 0.01), between MUFA and PUFA (r= −0.693, P < 0.01), between MUFA and total phytosterols content (r= −0.548, P < 0.01), and between PUFA and total phytosterols content (r= −0.811, P < 0.01). We detected a very significant negative correlation between total phytosterols content and tocopherols content (r= −0.744, P < 0.01).

Principal component analyses of fatty acids, phytosterols, and tocopherols composition

Principal component analyses provide data that are useful for breeding improved varieties. For example, Liang et al. (2019) studied the composition of fatty acids and sterols in 22 Acer truncatum plants, and used a principal component analysis to separate the plants into groups on the basis of their components [42]. Two-dimensional biplots for the first two principal components (PCs) obtained from PCAs based on fatty acids, phytosterols, and tocopherols composition and contents are shown in Fig. 2. For fatty acids composition and content, the first two PCs explained 71.10% of the total variance of fatty acids composition, and the tested C. retusus accessions were separated into four groups (Fig. 2A). Group I included WS-2, WS-3, WS-4, and WS-5, which were characterized by a high oil content and large proportions of PUFA and linoleic acid. Group II consisted of T-2, T-4, T-5, T-9, T-10, T-11, Z-1, Z-4 and Z-5, which were characterized by high proportions of MUFA, SFA, palmitic acid, stearic acid, and oleic acid. Group III included B-1, B-2, WA-1, S-2, S-3, and S-5 which were characterized by high levels of arachidic acid and arachidonic acid. Group IV included WA-2 and S-6, accessions with a medium level of the studied parameters (Fig. 2A). On the basis of these results, WS-2, WS-3, WS-4, and WS-5 were identified as ideal C. retusus germplasm resources with high oil content and high linoleic acid content, and T-2, T-4, T-5, T-9, T-10, T-11, Z-1, Z-4, and Z-5 were identified as C. retusus germplasm resources with a high oleic acid content.

For phytosterols composition and content, the first two PCs explained 72.2% of the total variance of phytosterols composition, and the tested accessions were separated into three groups (Fig. 2B). Group I included WA-1, WA-2, WS-2, WS-3, WS-4, and WS-5, which were characterized by a high level of total phytosterols, β-sitosterol, campestanol, Δ5-avenosterol, and Δ5, 24- stigmasterol. Group II included T-2, T-4, T-5, T-8, T-9, T-10, T-11, B-1, B-2, Z-1, Z-4, and Z-5, which were characterized by high levels of campesterol, campesteranol, and β-sitostanol. Group III included S-2, S-3, S-5 and S-6, which showed no significant difference in sterol composition and content compared with other groups. The results of the PCA identified WA-1, WA-2, WS-2, WS-3, WS-4, and WS-5 as C. retusus germplasm resources with a high phytosterols content.

For tocopherols composition and content, the first two PCs explained 91.2% of the total variance of tocopherols composition and the tested samples were separated into five groups (Fig. 2C). Group I included T-4, T-5, T-8, T-10, WS-4, and WS-5, which were characterized by high contents of total tocopherols, γ-tocopherol, and δ-tocopherol. Group II included T-2, T-9, WS-2, WS-3, and WA-2, which were characterized by a high α-tocopherol content. Group III included B-1, B-2, and T-11, which were characterized by a high β-tocopherol content. Group IV (S-2, S-6, and WA-1) and group V (S-3, S-5, Z-1, Z-4, and Z-5) showed no significant difference in phytosterols composition and content compared with other groups. These results identified T-4, T-5, T-8, T-10, WS-4, and WS-5 as C. retusus germplasm resources with a high tocopherols content. 

Conclusions

This is the first report on the oil content, and the fatty acids, phytosterols, and tocopherols content and composition in C. retusus kernels. There were significant differences in fruit morphological characteristics, oil content, and fatty acids, phytosterols, and tocopherols composition among 22 accessions. Our analyses indicate that the average oil content of C. retusus kernels is 36.55% ± 5.78%, and the oil comprises seven different fatty acids, of which oleic acid is the most abundant. The phytosterols content in C. retusus oil is significantly higher than that other woody oil crops. Seven phytosterols were detected in C. retusus oil, the main one being β-sitosterol. The tocopherols content detected in C. retusus oil far exceeded our expectations. The main form of tocopherols is γ-tocopherol, suggesting that C. retusus oil may have good antioxidant capacity. Correlation analyses and PCA identified T-2, T-4, T-5, T-9, T-10, T-11, Z-1, Z-4, and Z-5 as accessions with a high oil content and high oleic acid content; WA-1, WA-2, WS-2, WS-3, WS-4 and WS-5 as accessions with a high phytosterols content; and T-4, T-5, T- 8, T-10, WS-4, and WS-5 as accessions with a high tocopherols content. These results will be useful for the genetic improvement and/or selection of varieties that produce abundant high-quality edible oil. Such varieties could be cultivated to promote the development of the C. retusus oil industry.

Abbreviations

FTD, fruit transverse diameter; 

FSI, fruit shape index; 

GVD, grain vertical diameter; 

GTD, grain transverse diameter; 

GVD/ST, grain vertical diameter/shell thickness; 

SFA, saturated fatty acid; 

MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; 

PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid

Declarations

Funding

This work was supported by The Agricultural improved variety project of Shandong province (2021LZGC02303-2), Forestry Science and Technology Innovative Project of Shandong Province of China (LYCX02-2018-11) and Agricultural science and Technology Fund Project of Shandong province (2019LY001-4).

Author Contributions Wang Jinnan carried out the experiments, made the biological and literature interpretations of the results, and wrote the first draft; Wang Jinnan , Niu Muge analyzed the data; Sun Maotong, Ren Jing, Liu Cuishuang, Liuyuan and Guan Linshan participated in the sample collection and preliminary treatment; Li Jihong, conceived of the study, provided funding, directed the overall project. All authors read and approved the final Manuscript.

Data Availability The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent to participate Not applicable.

Consent for publication Not applicable.

Ethics approval This article does not contain any unethical subjects.

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that there is not confict of interest in the study.

References

  1. Jaewoo J, Kyeonghwa S, Eunji O, Lee DY, Baek NI (2015) Isolation and Identification of Triterpenoids and Sterols from the Flowers of Chionanthus retusus Lindl. & Paxton[J] J Appl Biol Chem 58(3):237–240. https://doi.org/10.3839/jabc.2015.037
  2. Lee YN, Jeong CH, Shim KH (2004) Isolation of Antioxidant and Antibrowning Substance from Chionanthus retusa Leaves. Journal of The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 33(9): 1 419–1 425. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2004.33.9.1419
  3. Lee YG, Lee H, Jung JW, Seo KH, Lee DY, Kim HG, Ko JH, Lee DS, Baek NI (2019) Flavonoids from Chionanthus retusus (Oleaceae) flowers and their protective effects against glutamate-induced cell toxicity in HT22 cells. Int J Mol Sci 20(14):3517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143517
  4. Gulcin I, Elias R, Gepdiremen A, Taoubi K (2009) Antioxidant secoiridoids from fringe tree (Chionanthus virginicus L.). Wood Sci Technol 43(34):195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-008-0234-1
  5. Chien CT, Huang LLK, Shen YC, Zhang RC, Chen SY, Yang JC, Pharis RP (2004) Storage Behavior of Chionanthus retusus Seed and Asynchronous Development of the Radicle and Shoot Apex during Germination in Relation to Germination Inhibitors, Including Abscisic Acid and Four Phenolic Glucosides. Plant Cell Physiol 45(9):1 158–1167. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pch129
  6. Das UN (2003) Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in the growth and development of the brain and memory. Nutrition 19(1):62–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(02)00852-3
  7. Demaison L, Moreau D (2002) Dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and coronary heart disease-related mortality: a possible mechanism of action. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 59(3):463–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8439-1
  8. Li GH, Wang XP, Yang HY, Zhang PF, Wu FQ, Li YC, Zhou YJ, Zhang X, Ma H, Zhang W, Li J (2020) Alpha Linolenic acid but not linolenic acid protects against hypertension: critical role of SIRT3 and autophagic flux. Cell Death Dis 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2277-7
  9. Hodson L, Rosqvist F, Parry SA (2020) The influence of dietary fatty acids on liver fat content and metabolism. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 79(1): 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665119000569
  10. Adlercreutz H (2002) Phytooestrogens and cancer. Lancet Oncol 3(6):364–373. http:// 10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00777-5
  11. Baker EJ, Valenzuela CA, De Souza CO, Yaqoob BP, Miles EA, Calder PC (2020) Comparative anti-inflammatory effects of plant- and marine-derived omega-3 fatty acids explored in an endothelial cell line. Biochim Et Biophys Acta-Molecular Cell Biology Lipids 1865(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2020.158662
  12. Lauritzen I, Blondeau N, Heurteaux C, Widmann C, Romey G, Lazdunski M (2000) Polyunsaturated fatty acids are potent neuroprotectors. EMBO J 19(8):1784–1793. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.8.1777
  13. Calder PC (2018) Very long-chain n-3 fatty acids and human health: fact, fiction and the future. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 77(l): 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665117003950
  14. Oomah BD (2001) Flaxseed as a functional food source. J Sci Food Agric 81(9):889–894. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.898
  15. Wiesenfeld PW, Babu US, Collins TFX, Sprando R, O'donnell MW, Flynn TJ, Black T, Olejnik N (2003) Flaxseed increased alinolenic and eicosapentaenoic acid and decreased arachidonic acid in serum and tissues of rat dams and offspring. Food Chem Toxicol 41(6):841–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00035-8
  16. Ander BP, Weber AR, Rampersad PP, Gilchrist JSC, Pierce GN, Anton L (2004) Dietary flaxseed protects against ventricular fibrillation induced by ischemiareperfusion in normal and hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Joximal of Nutrition 134(12):3250–3256. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2004.7.498
  17. Dyer JM, Stymne S, Green AG, Carlsson AS (2008) High-value oils from plants. Plant J 54(4):640–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03430.x
  18. Skilton MR, Pahkala K, Viikarij SA, Ronnemaa T, Simell O, Jula A, Niinikoski H, Celermajer DS, Raitakario T (2015) The association of dietary alpha-linolenic acid with blood pressure and subclinical atherosclerosis in people bom small for gestational age: the special turiox coronary risk factor intervention project study. Joxmial of Pediatrics 166(5):1252–1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.01.020
  19. Calder PC (2015) Marine omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes: Effects, mechanisms and clinical relevance. Biochim Biophys Acta 1851(4):469–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.08.010
  20. Calder PC (2017) Omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes: from molecules to man. Biochem Soc Trans 45(5):1105–1115. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20160474
  21. Li XJ, Wang Y, Liu F, Pi BY, Zhao T, Yu BJ (2020) Transcriptomic analysis of Glycine soja and G. max seedlings and functional characterization of GsGSTU24 and GsGSTU42 genes under submergence stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103963
  22. Miras-Moreno B, Sabaterjara AB, Pedreno MA, Almagro L (2016) Bioactivity of phytosterols and their production in plant in vitro cultures. J Agric Food Chem 64:7049–7058. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02345
  23. Miettinen TA, Puska P, Gylling H, Vanhanen H, Vartiainen E (1995) Reduction of serum cholesterol with sitostanol-ester margarine in a mildly hypercholesterolemic population. N Engl J Med 333(20):1308–1312. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199511163332002
  24. Moreau RA, Whitaker BD, Hicks KB (2002) Phytosterols, phytostanols, and their conjugates in foods: structural diversity, quantitative analysis, and health-promoting uses. Prog Lipid Res 41(6):457–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7827(02)00006-1
  25. Valsta LM, Lemström A, Ovaskainen ML, Lampi AM, Toivo J, Korhonen T, Piironen V (2004) Estimation of plant sterol and cholesterol intake in Finland: quality of new values and their effect on intake. Br J Nutr 92(4):671–678. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN20041234
  26. Rong S, Xu R, Li WF (2016) Phytosterols and dementia. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 71:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-016-0574-1
  27. Alemany L, Barbera R, Alegría A, Laparra JM (2014) Plant sterols from foods in inflammation and risk of cardiovascular disease: a real threat? Food Chem Toxicol 69:140–149
  28. Othman RA, Moghadasian MH (2011) Beyond cholesterol-lowering effects of plant sterols: clinical and experimental evidence of anti-inflammatory properties. Nutr Rev 69:371–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00399.x
  29. Woyengo TA, Ramprasath VR, Jones PJ (2009) Anticancer effects of phytosterols. Eur J Clin Nutr 63:813–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2009.29
  30. Cao YC, Li SG, Wang ZL, Chang FG, Kong JJ, Gai JY, Zhao TJ (2017) Identification of major quantitative trait loci for seed oil content in soybeans by combining linkage and genome-wide association mapping. Front Plant Sci 8:1222. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01222
  31. Tavva VS, Kim YH, Kagan IA, Dinkins R, Kim KH, Collins G (2007) Increased a-tocopherol content in soybean seed overexpressing the Perilla frutescens y-tocopherol methyltransferase gene. Plant Cell Rep 26(1):61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0218-2
  32. Raederstorff D, Wyss A, Calder PC (2015) Vitamin E function and requirements in relation to PUFA. Br J Nutr 114:1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711451500272X
  33. Sato K, Gosho M, Yamamoto T, Kobayashi Y, Ishii N (2015) Vitamin E has a beneficial effect on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-anaiysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrition 31:923–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2014.11.018
  34. Hanson C, Lyden E, Furtado J, Campos H, Litonjua AA (2016) Serum tocopherol levels and vitamin E intake are associated with lung function in the normative aging study. Clin Nutr 35:169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2015.01.020
  35. Munne BS (2005) The role of a-tocophherol in plant stress tolerance[J]. J Plant Physiol 162:743–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2005.04.022
  36. Scherder WC, Fehr WR, Welke GA, Tong W (2006) Tocopherol concentration and agronomic performance of soybean lines and reduced palmitate. Crop Sci 46:1286–1290. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0227
  37. Seker MA, Kemal MG, Ipek M, Toplu C, Kaleci N (2008) Screening and comparing tocopherols in the rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and olive (Olea europaea L.) varieties using high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Food Sci Nut 59(6):483–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637480701539484
  38. El-Esawi M (2017) Genetic diversity and evolution of Brassica genetic resources: from morphology to novel genomic technologies – a review. Plant Genet Resour Charact Util 15(5):388–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262116000058
  39. Zaher H, Boulouha B, Baaziz M, Sikaoui L, Gaboun F, Udupa SM (2011) Morphological and genetic diversity in olive (Olea europaea subsp. Europaea L.) clones and varieties. Plant Omics J 4(7):370–376. https://doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2012/0094-0271
  40. Zubr J, Matthäus B (2002) Effects of growth conditions on fatty acids and tocopherols in Camelina sativa oil. Ind Crop Prod 15:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(01)00106-6
  41. Wang JJ, Yu SL (2019) Discussion on the high oleic peanut industry. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing
  42. Liang Q, Wang WW, Yuan FL, Liu X, Li DL, Yang KQ (2019) Characterization of yuanbaofeng (Acer truncatum Bunge) samaras: Oil, fatty acid, and phytosterol content. Industrial Crops & Products 135:344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.032
  43. Huang Z (2015) Overview of pharmacological research of Camellia Oil. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3582.2015.17.002. Modern Food
  44. Yu L, Wang Y, Wu GC, Jin J (2020) Quality and composition of virgin olive oils from indigenous and european cultivars grown in China. J Am Oil Chem Soc 97(4):12315–12327. https://doi.org/10.1002/aocs.12315
  45. Larsen LF, Jespersen J, Marckmann P (1999) Are olive oil diets antkhrombotic? Diets enriched with olive, rapeseed, or sunflower oil affect postprandial factor VII differently. Am J Clin Nutr 70(6):976–982. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAlim.28.1999.4.7
  46. Perez-Jimenez F, Lopez MJ, Mata P (2002) Protective effect of dietary monounsaturated fat on arteriosclerosis: beyond cholesterol. Atherosclerosis 163(2):385–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9150(02)00033-3
  47. Eguchi K, Manabe I, Oishi-Tanaka Y, Ohsugi M, Kono N, Ogata F, Yagi N, Ohto U, Kimoto M, Miyake K, Tobe K, Arai H, Kadowaki T, Nagai R (2012) Saturated fatty acid and TLR signaling link β cell dysfunction and islet inflammation. Cell Metab 15:518–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.01.023
  48. Colla LM, Muccillo-Baisch AL, Costa JAV (2008) Spimlina platensis effects on the levels of total cholesterol, HDL and triacylglycerols in rabbks fed with a hypercholesterolemic diet. brazilian archives of biology and technology 51(2):405–411. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132008000200022
  49. Moreau RA, Nyström L, Whitaker BD, Winkler-Moser JK, Baer DJ, Gebauer SK, Hicks KB (2018) Phytosterols and their derivatives: structural diversity, distribution, metabolism, analysis, and health-promoting uses. Prog Lipid Res 70:35–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2018.04.001
  50. FDA (2010) Food Labeling; Health CLaims: Phytosterols and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. Proposed Rule. Retrieved from. https://www.regulations.gov/document? D = FDA-2000-P-0102-0006
  51. Baccouri B, Manai H, Casas JS (2018) Tunisian wild olive (Olea europaeaL. subsp. Oleaster) oils: Sterolic and triterpenic dialcohol compounds. Ind Crop Prod 120:11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.035
  52. Venegas-Calerón M, Ruíz-Méndez MV, Martínez-Force E (2017) Characterization of Xanthoceras sorbifoliumBunge seeds: Lipids, proteins and saponins content. Ind Crop Prod 109:192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.022
  53. Phillips KM, Ruggio DM, Ashraf-Khorassani M (2005) Phytosterol composition of nuts and seeds commonly consumed in the United States. J Agric Food Chem 3(24):9436–9445. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf051505h
  54. Munne-Bosch S, Alegre L (2002) The function of tocopherols and tocotrienols in plants. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 21:31–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0735-260291044179
  55. Christen WG, Michael GJ, Hennekens CH (2000) Design of physicians’ health study II—a randomized trial of beta-carotene, vitamins e and c, and multivitamins, in prevention of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and eye disease, and review of results of completed trials. Elsevier Sci Inc 10:125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-2797(99)00042-3
  56. FDA (2013) Petition for a Qualified Health Claim for a Nutraceutical Formulation and Management of Behavior and Cognitive Difficulties that Can Accompany Dementia. Retrieved from. https://www.regulations.gov/document? D = FDA-2016-Q-1523
  57. Wang M, Hu L, Guo J, Yu D (2011) L. Jiang. Determination of main fatty acid composition in fractionated olive oils by FTIR spectroscopy. Trans Chin Soc Agricultural Eng 6. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2011-10775-5
  58. Chen ZC, Ni ZL, Mo RH, Zhong DL, Tang FB (2018) Comprehensive evaluation on quality of oils from seven kinds of woody oilcrops. China Oils and Fats 43(11):80–85. https://doi.org/doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7969.2018.11.017
  59. 59. Chen ZC, Ni ZL, Mo RH, Zhong DL, Tang FB (2018) Comprehensive evaluation on quality of oils from seven kinds of woody oilcrops. China Oils and Fats 43 (11): 80–85. https://doi.org/doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7969.2018.11.017.

Tables

Table 1 Variation of morphological characteristics of 22 Chionanthus retusus accessions.

 

Accessions

Fruit character

Kernel character

Yield character

Fresh weight(hundred grains)/g

Fruit vertical diameter/mm

Fruit transverse diameter/mm

Fruit shape index

Grain weight(hundred grains)/g

Grain vertical diameter/mm

Grain transverse

diameter/mm

Shell thickness/mm

Vertical diameter/shell thickness

Kernel weight(hundred grains)/g

Kernel shell weight(hundred grains)/g

T-2

79.360±1.56h

12.255±0.23d

10.376±0.84ab

1.182cd

23.951±0.21g

10.562±1.11e

7.138±0.43a

0.382±0.02f

30.027a

14.991±1.52c

8.960±0.91j

T-4

90.706±3.81e

12.970±1.12cd

9.420±0.22c

1.389b

32.271±2,14c

11.640±1.31cd

7.300±0.55a

0.680±0.09bc

16.559jk

14.737±1.30c

17.534±1.56b

T-5

47.423±0.76m

10.900±0.25ef

7.809±0.05e

1.398b

14.334±1.11k

10.165±1.04e

5.763±0.72bc

0.386±0.05f

24.467cd

7.751±0.54j

6.583±0.71l

T-8

121.303±7.51a

15.374±0.38a

11.380±0.18a

1.352b

36.067±0.98a

13.568±1.21ab

7.494±0.67a

0.665±0.10c

20.273fg

16.172±1.83ab

19.895±0.25a

T-9

89.296±2.79e

12.430±0.56d

10.030±0.47b

1.244bc

26.332±2.21de

10.460±1.03ef

6.880±0.52ab

0.550±0.04d

20.531fg

14.219±1.25c

12.113±0.11f

T-10

69.327±1.52ij

11.262±0.43e

10.301±0.93ab

1.094e

20.148±1.34i

9.596±0.87ef

6.898±0.29ab

0.434±0.03de

25.085c

11.524±1.11e

8.624±0.92j

T-11

61.024±0.34k

11.990±0.25de

9.030±0.71c

1.331b

19.745±1.23i

10.240±1.98e

6.220±0.54ab

0.510±0.06d

21.143f

9.780±0.99fg

9.965±0.93hi

WS-2

39.979±0.63n

9.527±0.72g

7.805±0.60e

1.226c

10.085±0.94l

7.513±3.20g

5.120±0.42c

0.445±±0.07de

19.683fgh

8.157±0.87i

4.928±0.55m

WS-3

73.850±2.14i

11.832±0.89de

9.696±0.29bc

1.223c

24.889±2.12f

9.699±1.21ef

7.149±0.71a

0.426±0.02de

25.575bc

14.534±1.32c

10.355±1.31h

WS-4

112.705±3.58b

13.730±0.98c

11.076±1.01a

1.242bc

34.920±3.13b

11.654±0.85cd

7.680±0.66a

0.689±0.08bc

18.350i

17.078±1.98a

17.842±2.11a

WS-5

60.916±2.81kl

11.125±1.05e

8.996±1.20cd

1.239bc

17.839±1.34j

9.947±0.48ef

6.314±0.52ab

0.449±0.02de

22.461e

10.185±1.05f

7.654±0.45k

WA-1

72.750±1.90i

15.361±0.45a

9.227±0.54c

1.670a

24.970±2.31f

14.322±1.21a

6.387±0.61ab

0.765±0.13b

16.415k

10.116±1.00f

14.854±1.78d

WA-2

73.214±1.05i

13.548±0.21c

9.876±1.21bc

1.376b

24.448±2.55f

12.092±1.20c

7.399±0.70a

0.596±0.06cd

19.890fg

11.086±1.11e

13.362±1.19e

S-2

75.254±2.06i

12.342±0.59d

9.713±0.76bc

1.272bc

23.560±2.12g

10.340±0.76e

6.491±0.49ab

0.645±0.04c

17.338j

9.907±0.78fg

13.653±1.67e

S-3

100.756±5.14c

11.679±2.14de

11.189±0.11a

1.042e

31.961±3.02c

9.423±0.81ef

7.705±0.95a

0.671±0.07bc

17.205j

14.681±1.65c

17.280±1.82b

S-5

89.520±3.84e

13.436±0.78c

10.293±1.00ab

1.308b

31.738±3.08c

11.743±1.53cd

7.411±0.83a

0.571±0.02cd

21.084f

16.665±1.80a

15.073±1.87d

S-6

63.316±1.81k

11.630±0.37de

8.960±0.51cd

1.300b

18.318±1.51j

9.850±0.49ef

6.120±1.01b

0.511±0.04d

20.441fg

9.531±0.99fg

8.787±0.88j

B-1

49.240±0.94m

11.615±0.11de

8.743±0.71cd

1.330b

21.919±1.93h

10.166±1.10e

6.827±1.14ab

0.416±0.05e

24.824cd

10.429±1.21ef

11.490±1.20fg

B-2

70.547±1.58ij

12.205±0.17d

10.006±1.11b

1.221bc

27.268±2.22d

9.879±0.89ef

6.716±0.72ab

0.417±0.01e

26.789b

15.949±1.65ab

11.319±1.10fg

Z-1

58.139±0.47l

14.131±0.26bc

8.859±0.39cd

1.601a

19.814±1.32i

12.670±1.00bc

6.915±0.53ab

0.450±0.03de

26.118b

8.954±0.65gh

10.860±1.03gh

Z-4

83.890±2.08ef

12.346±0.62d

9.933±0.64bc

1.244bc

26.836±2.11d

10.854±0.82e

6.945±0.71ab

0.889±0.09a

12.638l

10.710±1.09ef

16.126±1.47c

Z-5

98.982±0.56cd

12.479±0.23d

11.599±1.12a

1.077e

24.718±3.10f

9.715±0.91ef

7.412±0.45a

0.694±0.08bc

17.649ij

12.531±1.20d

12.187±1.54f

Average

76.432±20.75

12.462±1.39

9.742±1.04

1.289±0.15

24.370±6.52

10.732±1.51

6.831±0.65

0.556±0.12

21.116±4.19

12.122±3.21

12.247±3.97

CV(%)

27.15

11.18

10.63

11.48

26.75

14.09

9.53

25.18

19.83

26.52

32.42

Column data marked with different superscripts indicate significant differences among accessions, (P < 0.05).

  

Table 2 Oil content and fatty acid composition of 22 Chionanthus retusus accessions.

Accessions

Oil content/%

Fatty acid composition

Palmitic acid(C16:0)

Stearic acid(C18:0)

Oleic acid(C18:1)

Linoleic acid(C18:2)

Linolenic acid(C18:3)

Arachidic acid(C20:0)

Arachidonic acid(C20:1)

SFA

MUFA

PUFA

T-2

34.9±0.65ef

4.28±0.03f

2.16±0.01e

54.63±0.09cd

31.17±0.05cde

0.41±0.02gh

0.28±0.04i

6.57±0.07cde

54.91±0.13ef

31.58±0.07def

T-4

38.2±0.10cd

4.23±0.12f

2.10±0.01e

54.70±0.17cd

31.33±0.09cde

0.44±0.03f

0.35±0.04efg

6.46±0.31de

55.05±0.21de

31.77±0.12de

T-5

39.2±0.38bcd

4.25±0.05f

2.34±0.06cd

54.67±0.25cd

31.47±0.12cd

0.41±0.03gh

0.38±0.03cd

6.72±0.14cd

55.05±0.28de

31.88±0.15de

T-8

34.5±0.53ef

4.21±0.12f

2.31±0.09cd

54.73±0.47cd

30.60±0.05de

0.40±0.05efg

0.38±0.03cd

6.64±0.24cd

55.11±0.50de

31.00±0.10ef

T-9

40.3±0.87bc

4.22±0.02f

1.98±0.15fg

54.67±0.45cd

31.30±0.17cd

0.42±0.04e

0.38±0.06cd

6.33±0.21def

55.05±0.51de

31.72±0.21de

T-10

35.5±0.60ef

4.21±0.01f

2.04±0.15ef

54.03±0.08cd

31.27±0.16cde

0.40±0.04efg

0.38±0.03cd

6.40±0.19def

54.41±0.11efg

31.67±0.20def

T-11

39.6±0.64bcd

4.06±0.32gh

1.74±0.08gh

55.77±0.06c

31.30±0.55cd

0.40±0.02efg

0.35±0.03efg

5.93±0.42g

56.12±0.09de

31.70±0.52def

Z-1

37.8±1.15cd

4.98±0.06ab

2.52±0.24bc

58.97±0.28ab

31.43±0.11cd

0.47±0.03cde

0.32±0.05h

7.63±0.33a

59.29±0.33ab

31.90±0.14de

Z-4

37.2±0.96cde

4.28±0.01f

2.53±0.11bc

59.43±0.04ab

30.70±0.06de

0.48±0.05cd

0.36±0.09e

6.99±0.16bc

59.79±0.13ab

31.18±0.11ef

Z-5

40.0±0.96bc

4.15±0.01fg

2.64±0.09b

59.67±0.15ab

31.40±0.07cd

0.44±0.04f

0.33±0.03gh

7.00±0.14bc

60.00±0.18a

31.84±0.11de

B-1

28.9±0.58h

4.76±0.01cd

2.88±0.01a

53.60±0.08cd

31.87±0.35cd

0.49±0.04b

0.27±0.02j

7.64±0.20a

53.87±0.10fgh

32.36±0.41d

B-2

30.5±0.36g

4.69±0.22cde

2.83±0.05ab

53.10±0.11cd

31.40±0.06cd

0.49±0.06b

0.28±0.03i

7.52±0.27ab

53.38±0.14fgh

31.89±0.12de

S-3

28.3±0.35h

3.88±0.04h

1.45±0.01hij

49.53±0.06ih

30.27±0.29de

0.41±0.03gh

0.13±0.03de

0.34±0.05fgh

5.33±0.05hi

49.87±0.11jkl

30.68±0.32ef

S-5

31.4±0.95g

3.44±0.08i

1.73±0.08gh

50.17±0.12gi

31.37±1.15cd

0.39±0.03ghi

0.13±0.03de

0.35±0.03efg

5.17±0.16ij

50.52±0.15jkl

31.76±1.18bc

S-6

34.5±1.60ef

3.41±0.02i

1.72±0.04gh

50.30±0.06gi

27.00±0.80f

0.39±0.03ghi

0.13±0.03de

0.40±0.04ab

5.13±0.06ij

50.70±0.10jkl

27.39±0.83g

S-2

29.2±0.38h

3.42±0.06i

1.58±0.01hi

51.53±0.37fg

30.47±0.81de

0.41±0.04ef

0.12±0.03ef

0.39±0.01bc

5.00±0.07jk

51.92±0.38ij

30.88±0.85ef

WS-2

42.8±1.01b

5.02±0.31ab

1.80±0.08gh

56.20±0.04bc

33.03±1.01b

0.38±0.04hi

0.13±0.03de

0.38±0.04cd

6.82±0.39cd

56.58±0.08ab

33.41±1.05bc

WS-3

42.4±1.30b

4.63±0.02cde

2.10±0.09e

55.40±0.08bc

34.80±0.51a

0.34±0.02k

0.15±0.03c

0.35±0.03efg

6.73±0.11cde

55.75±0.11bc

35.14±0.53a

WS-4

42.3±0.49b

5.09±0.02ab

2.09±0.06ef

56.03±0.06bc

34.40±0.46a

0.34±0.03k

0.13±0.02de

0.37±0.04ef

7.18±0.08bc

56.40±0.10ab

34.74±0.49a

WS-5

47.5±0.67a

4.80±0.32cd

2.15±0.11e

56.37±0.12bc

33.43±1.11b

0.35±0.03jk

0.13±0.03de

0.36±0.06ef

6.95±0.43bc

55.73±0.18ab

33.78±1.14bc

WA-1

29.0±0.45h

4.21±0.02f

2.06±0.01ef

53.53±0.03cd

31.80±0.10d

0.51±0.05a

0.18±0.04b

0.27±0.04j

6.27±0.03def

53.80±0.07fgh

32.31±0.15d

WA-2

30.8±1.00g

4.48±0.03e

1.93±0.09fg

54.63±0.25cd

27.03±0.15f

0.47±0.04cde

0.21±0.04a

0.26±0.03k

6.41±0.12de

54.89±0.28ef

27.50±0.19g

Average

36.55±5.78

4.30±0.49

2.12±0.39

52.33±3.22

31.31±3.28

0.42±0.05

0.15±0.03

0.36±0.08

6.49±0.78

52.33±3.23

31.88±3.26

CV/%

15.81

11.40

17.65

5.84

10.07

11.90

20.00

22.22

12.02

6.17

10.22

Column data marked with different superscripts indicate significant differences among accessions at P < 0.05.

 

Table 3 Total phytosterol and phytosterol composition of  22 Chionanthus retusus accessions.

Accessions

 

Phytosterols mg/100g

Campesterol

Campestanol

Campesteranol

β-Sitosterol

β-Sitostanol

Δ5-Avenosterol

Δ5, 24- Stigmasterol

Total phytosterols

T-2

11.41±0.25h

15.25±0.85hi

18.63±0.31ab

166.19±1.05ef

37.48±0.94de

248.96±0.93de

T-4

12.95±0.57fg

12.09±1.79k

16.74±0.89cd

178.88±1.98de

36.12±0.74e

256.78±0.56cde

T-5

11.49±0.05h

12.76±0.79jk

19.50±0.92a

187.63±2.16bcd

35.18±0.50ef

266.56±0.78cd

T-8

14.13±1.04e

28.10±1.17e

13.44±0.76f

195.13±1.53abc

49.65±0.64a

290.45±1.93c

T-9

10.99±0.05hi

17.53±0.52g

15.92±0.67cd

167.70±2.91def

42.28±0.20b

254.42±1.25cde

T-10

11.98±0.50g

23.57±0.70f

14.96±1.13de

155.93±6.67fg

36.26±0.16e

242.70±1.06de

T-11

16.95±0.13d

17.21±0.28n

18.73±0.58ab

174.53±1.39de

32.57±0.23h

259.99±0.63cde

Z-1

22.03±0.33a

17.58±0.26g

19.33±0.43a

163.85±1.83ef

33.56±0.89g

256.35±0.31cde

Z-4

22.95±0.81a

18.44±0.98g

17.80±0.47bc

170.28±2.69def

38.60±1.08d

268.07±0.50cd

Z-5

21.93±0.28a

16.88±0.86gh

19.30±0.26a

162.70±2.00ef

33.88±0.40g

274.69±0.64cd

B-1

12.43±0.15g

13.31±0.80ijk

10.07±0.41h

165.56±2.76ef

33.74±0.23g

235.11±0.71def

B-2

12.18±0.21g

14.21±0.17hij

10.46±0.55gh

172.60±0.66def

31.66±0.02hi

241.11±0.88de

S-3

17.59±0.30c

31.74±1.56cd

13.94±1.07ef

176.40±0.46de

2.99±0.44de

242.66±1.62de

S-5

12.17±0.14g

32.37±0.39c

14.44±0.28de

174.47±3.32de

2.26±0.46de

225.71±1.21ef

S-6

11.83±0.19h

32.84±1.02c

11.75±0.46g

198.70±4.17bc

3.17±0.09de

258.29±0.84cde

S-2

14.43±0.35e

36.60±1.05b

10.95±1.01gh

199.40±1.91bc

5.97±0.28c

267.35±1.05cd

WS-2

11.90±0.23h

36.28±0.97b

15.75±1.72cd

232.30±4.69a

41.26±0.65bc

7.92±0.14ab

5.96±0.46c

351.37±0.54a

WS-3

11.95±0.09gh

42.90±5.30a

18.42±1.08ab

224.67±34.56a

32.59±0.10h

2.43±1.6de

4.46±3.50a

337.42±1.75ab

WS-4

12.43±0.07g

31.89±1.47de

15.46±0.37cde

221.30±2.61a

33.31±0.29g

9.32±0.37a

4.05±0.58e

327.76±1.83ab

WS-5

13.04±0.18f

13.86±1.20k

15.24±2.27cde

239.23±3.43a

32.38±0.11h

9.87±0.31a

4.33±0.32e

347.95±1.43a

WA-1

20.39±0.22b

28.19±1.33e

15.75±0.98cd

237.03±2.25a

34.57±0.10f

9.15±0.21a

7.91±0.64d

352.99±1.67a

WA-2

20.22±0.58b

32.19±1.13c

15.74±0.17cd

240.67±1.07a

39.52±0.29c

3.75±0.41d

8.50±0.39b

360.59±1.54a

Average

14.88±4.05

23.90±5.39

15.56±2.92

191.14±28.51

36.37±4.56

5.68±0.51

5.87±0.57

280.33±43.96

CV/%

27.22

22.55

18.77

14.92

12.54

14.45

16.19

15.68

Column data marked with different superscripts indicate significant differences among accessions at P < 0.05.

 

Table 4 Total tocopherols and tocopherols composition of 22 Chionanthus retusus accessions. 

Accessions

 

tocopherols µg/g

α-tocopherol

β-tocopherol

γ-tocopherol

δ-tocopherol

Total tocopherols

T-2

32.82±0.45def

5.75±0.11efg

555.60±10.45bcd

11.65±0.63bcd

605.82±2.37bcd

T-4

37.53±0.22c

7.33±0.32d

586.55±14.76a

14.12±0.87a

645.53±5.84a

T-5

33.86±0.83

6.85±0.17de

572.71±4.56ab

11.94±0.42bc

625.36±4.28abc

T-8

44.21±1.56a

9.16±0.23ab

583.85±8.39a

14.88±0.61a

652.10±8.56a

T-9

36.38±1.05cde

7.00±0.61de

560.84±5.28abc

12.24±0.70ab

616.46±6.10abc

T-10

40.19±0.74b

7.83±0.30cd

593.94±13.92a

12.26±0.61ab

654.22±1.94a

T-11

39.64±0.92bc

9.11±0.45ab

524.26±15.21cd

12.61±0.94ab

585.62±5.45bcd

Z-1

19.13±0.60h

4.82±0.32fg

452.21±11.17fg

4.78±0.11i

480.94±2.11efg

Z-4

21.20±0.67h

6.93±0.55de

465.27±6.82efg

4.96±0.20i

498.36±4.06def

Z-5

15.12±0.59i

6.48±0.21a

472.14±9.76efg

5.25±0.16i

501.99±3.17def

B-1

44.15±0.62a

8.43±0.33bc

508.31±7.24cde

8.03±0.44g

568.92±4.85cde

B-2

42.64±0.71ab

9.56±0.52a

523.63±8.18cd

10.02±0.53def

585.85±1.81bcd

S-3

32.37±0.61ef

6.54±0.15def

439.49±11.34fgh

6.54±0.47h

484.94±1.79efg

S-5

34.83±0.38de

7.56±0.41cd

438.73±6.23fgh

8.51±0.58g

489.63±5.72efg

S-6

30.13±0.45g

7.37±0.50cd

484.36±8.42def

7.67±0.36gh

529.53±6.44def

S-2

33.58±0.79de

8.84±0.39bc

498.91±6.71def

9.25±0.30efg

550.58±5.13cde

WS-2

35.07±0.32de

8.03±0.24bcd

556.86±7.06abc

8.58±0.54g

608.54±1.90bcd

WS-3

40.65±0.64b

9.01±0.16ab

558.64±9.05abc

9.52±0.60efg

617.82±4.05abc

WS-4

33.59±0.70de

7.26±0.30cde

579.12±6.41a

8.50±0.33g

628.47±3.88abc

WS-5

36.94±1.54cde

6.77±0.45de

586.23±5.55a

11.64±0.41bcd

641.58±3.27a

WA-1

30.60±1.07g

5.84±0.31efg

501.43±4.84cd

10.32±0.74de

548.19±5.32cde

WA-2

36.22±0.44cde

6.72±0.57de

548.67±7.39bcd

10.83±0.68cde

602.44±4.44bcd

Average

34.1±7.56

7.50±1.28

526.90±51.36

9.60±3.05

578.31±58.66

CV/%

22,17

17.07

9.47

31,77

10.14

Column data marked with different superscripts indicate significant differences among accessions at P < 0.05.

  

Table 5 Spearman’s correlation coefficients fruit morphology, oil, total phytosterol and tocopherol content, and saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acid content of Chionanthus retusus accessions

Characteristics

Correlation coefficient

 

Fresh weight

FTD

FSI

Grain weight

GVD

GTD

VD/ST

Kernel weight

Kernel rate

Oil content

SFA

MUFA

PUFA

phytosterol

Vitamin E

Fresh weight

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FTD

0.589**

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FSI

0.902**

0.448*

1.0000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grain weight

-0.259

0.566**

-0.478*

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GVD

0.907**

0.663**

0.787**

-0.086

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GTD

0.414

0.953**

0.229

0.722**

0.524*

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VD/ST

0.810**

0.556**

0.844**

-0.223

0.860**

0.412

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kernel weight

0.794**

0.219

0.201

0.032

0.314

0.181

0.105

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kernel rate

0.790**

0.385

0.758**

-0.34

0.855**

0.215

0.763**

0.049

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil content

-0.209

-0.487*

-0.030

-0.459*

-0.266

-0.501*

-0.119

0.762**

0.235

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

SFA

-0.003

-0.228

0.072

-0.300

-0.179

-0.345

-0.068

0.154

0.099

0.407

1.000

 

 

 

 

MUFA

-0.164

0.017

-0.115

0.131

-0.106

0.038

0.012

0.330

-0.024

0.136

0.289

1.000

 

 

 

PUFA

-0.076

-0.085

-0.093

0.005

-0.229

-0.090

-0.103

-0.029

-0.177

0.043

-0.561**

-0.693**

1.000

 

 

phytosterol

-0.024

-0.158

-0.043

-0.110

-0.096

-0.198

-0.051

0.022

0.038

-0.653**

0.038

-0.548**

-0.811**

1.000

 

Total tocopherols

0.097

0.032

0.063

-0.056

0.053

-0.048

0.016

-0.069

0.109

0.002

0.271

-0.119

0.093

-0.744**

1.000

FTD, Fruit transverse diameter; FSI, Fruit shape index ; GVD, Grain vertical diameter; GTD, Grain transverse diameter; VD/ST, Vertical diameter/shell thickness; SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.