The study group consisted of 627 children, aged 10–15 years, including 299 (47.7%) girls and 328 (52.35%) boys (Table 5).
Table 5
Basic characteristics of the study group.
Variable
|
Girls (n = 299)
Mean ± SD
|
Min-Max
|
Boys (n = 328)
Mean ± SD
|
Min-Max
|
Z
|
p
|
Body mass [kg]
|
43.86 ± 11.48
|
21–77
|
45.28 ± 13.21
|
23–99
|
-0.764
|
0.445
|
Height [cm]
|
151 ± 10
|
128–173
|
152 ± 12
|
126–183
|
-0.250
|
0.803
|
BMI
|
18.84 ± 3.35
|
11.35–29.32
|
19.24 ± 3.72
|
12.37–36.51
|
-1.008
|
0.314
|
Mean-arithmetic mean, SD-standard deviation, Z- statistical values of the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test for two independent samples, BMI- body mass index, p-significance level |
The assumptions of the study took into account the inclusion criteria, i.e. informed consent to attend the study protocol, complete documentation of the study, no defects in the locomotor system. The exclusion criteria comprised the lack of informed consent to attend the study protocol, incomplete documentation of the study, and any defects in the locomotor system, as established through an interview.
A series of pertinent measurements were taken, i.e. individual body height was measured with the aid of a German-made SECA meter (93/42/EEC, 2007/47/EC), body weight by a Japanese-made Tanita BC-418MA scales (93/42/EEC Annex II). Assessment of the plantar part of the foot in static conditions was made with a 2D podoscan. Plantar pressure of the foot exerted against the surface in static conditions was assessed with an Italian-made FreeMed platform, operated by with FreeStep Pro software (FreeMed, Sensor Medica Italy, no.10806). Postural assessment was completed with 2D Videography (Sensor Medica, Italy), a device facilitating morphological measurements of body asymmetry.
The 2D FootCAD podoscan is a computerized podoscope assessing the plantar part of the foot. The length, width, pertinent angles and axes of the foot are determined, as well as the load-bearing zones of the foot are also subjected to interpretation [3, 8, 9].
The following indicators were assessed: foot length - in mm, forefoot width - in mm, Clarke’s angle – in °, Wejsflog (W) index, hallux valgus angle (α) – in °, the angle of the varus deformity of the fifth toe (β) - in ° (Fig. 3) [3, 28, 29].
The Clarke angle values were the basis for the assessment of the longitudinal arch of the foot. And so: flat foot occurs in the range < 30°, foot with a reduced arch 31° − 41°, properly arched foot 42° − 54 °, foot with a raised arch > 55° [3, 13, 28, 29].
The Wejsflog index (foot length/width, ratio 3:1) was used to assess the transverse arch. The transversely flat rate is indicated by the values closer to "2", the values of the correct rate are closer to "3". The correct valgus angle (α) is up to 9 ° [3, 4].
A dynamometric platform (FreeMed, Sensor Medica, manufactured in Italy), operated by FreeStep Pro software, was used for all stabilometric tests [3, 30]. The subject adopted a free-standing position, with his feet parallel, upper limbs hanging loosely along the trunk, his eyes looking straight ahead. The duration of the measurement was 30 seconds.
The subject was in a free-standing position, with his feet parallel, upper limbs hanging loosely along the trunk, his eyes looking straight ahead.
The interpretation of the movement of the foot pressure center (COP) was made during the assessment of the following indicators: length of sway - determines the length of the COP trajectory in mm – COP length; surface - surface area of the COP sway in mm² - COP field area; mean X - mean value in mm of the COP trajectory in the X axis - COP X mean; mean Y- mean value in mm of the COP trajectory in the Y axis - COP Y mean; X axis - the range of COP movement in the X axis in mm in the mid-lateral direction of ML - COP X; Y axis - the range of COP movement in the Y axis in mm in the antero-posterior direction AP - COP Y [3, 29].
Currently, the most common method of assessing individual balance is COP signal measurement. In stabilometry, the most frequently analysed variables attesting to a correlation with deteriorated balance are the length of the COP trajectory, the actual size of the COP deflection area, mean COP X and Y, and COP shifts in the X and Y axis [30].
A 2D Videography is yet another software package powering the FreeMed Posture (Sensor Medica, Italy) device applied in the study. It is a system dedicated to postural and gait assessment, fitted out with a camera and a tripod. A 2D Videography (Video Pack) makes it possible to take comprehensive morphological measurements of any possible body asymmetries. The readouts are subsequently processed by the FreeStepPro software (no 10806), which automatically measures and compares possible asymmetries and pertinent angles.
The subjects' knee valgus was successfully assessed with the aid of 2D Videography.
Statistical methods
Statistical software R v.4.0.1 was used to process the data yielded throughout the study protocol. The arithmetic mean, standard deviation, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test for two independent measurements, and the significance level were applied for the basic description.
Morphological variables of the feet, i.e. hallux valgus angle, Clarke's angle, Wejsflog index were taken into account, as well as the key somatic variables, i.e. age, sex, BMI.
With a view to checking the correlation between the stability indices and the above-referenced variables, linear regression models were applied. Dependent variables were subjected to a transformation. For the variables with positive values Box-Cox transformation was used, whereas for the remaining variables - the Yeo-Johnson counterpart. All variables were selected using stepwise backward regression, based on the Snedecor's F statistics.
In view of the risk of strong collinearity in the case of several variables, the mean values were prepared instead of considering the right and the left foot separately. Correlation coefficient for both feet was established to have oscillated above 0.75, which makes it possible to have both feet taken under consideration conjointly, whilst making use of average values. The Wejsflog index, the forefoot, hindfoot, and foot length appeared in the model as an average for both feet.