4.1 Single-factor experiment for ultrasound effect validation
The independent variable of the single-factor experiment for ultrasonic effect verification was ultrasonic intensity, but in order to prove the applicability of ultrasonic, three levels of feed rate were also used to repeat the experiment separately after fixing the spindle speed to 110 krpm, and the three sets of experiments were observed and analyzed separately. The experimental results were observed in an ultra-field depth microscope as shown in Fig. 11.
The single-factor experimental data for the ultrasonic effect validation were counted and plotted as two-dimensional line graphs of the results for micro-hole roughness, entrance burr, and exit burr, respectively. Figure 12 shows the results of the average micro-hole roughness measurements for the repeated experiments with three different drilling parameters.
It can be seen that the micro-hole roughness values show an overall decreasing trend after loading ultrasonic vibration at different drilling parameters, but at a certain level of ultrasonic intensity, the micro-hole roughness values at some of the parameters show a slight increase again. This is because the micro-hole roughness of the PCB is determined by the processing of the copper foil layer and the resin-glass fiber layer together. Copper foil is a plastic material, ultrasonic vibration not only enhances the cutting effect of the main cutting edge of the micro-drill on the copper foil material, it also causes the secondary cutting edge to rework the fracture of the copper foil material at the hole wall under high frequency reciprocal vibration, which makes the ductile fracture of the copper foil protruding from the hole wall occur again.
However, glass fiber composites with anisotropy will fracture in different ways depending on the angle between the cutting direction and the fiber direction. And when the amplitude of ultrasonic vibration increases to a certain level, the resin softened by the high temperature inside the hole will be deformed as the micro-drill pulls on the glass fiber supporting it, causing the micro-hole roughness to rise slightly. However, regardless of the ultrasonic intensity, the micro-hole roughness values are smaller under different drilling parameters than for ordinary drilling, which is sufficient to prove that the ultrasonic-assisted technology has an improved effect on the micro-hole quality of PCBs.
In addition to the micro-hole roughness, ultrasonic-assisted drilling has a good improvement on the burr generation. As Fig. 13 shows the average entrance burr length measurement results for the repeated experiments with three different drilling parameters.
The entrance burr is formed because the copper foil material at the edge of the hole is also squeezed during drilling, and the micro-drill moves the deformed material upwards a small distance when it is retired. Therefore, the burr is actually a plastic flow deformation of the copper foil material that has not been removed and turned into chips. From the previous mechanistic study, it is clear that the effective front-to-back angle of the cutting edge changes periodically during ultrasonic-assisted drilling, which reduces the force on the residual material in the direction of the workpiece when the cutting edge cuts into the workpiece and weakens the burr formation. In addition, the high-frequency vibration of the micro-drill in the feed direction causes the copper foil material at the edge of the hole at the entrance to be constantly scraped by the side of the micro-drill. The sub-cutting edge of the micro-drill also cuts the material around the hole in the feed direction due to the high-frequency vibration in the axial direction when drilling and retracting the tool, which has the effect of smoothing the burr.
Figure 14 below shows a line graph of the average exit burr lengths measured from repeated experiments with three different drilling parameters.
The exit burr is also caused by the plastic flow deformation of the copper foil material, but for the exit part of the material, the contact time between the micro-drill blade and it is only for a short moment when it drills through and then immediately retires. Therefore, the scraping and plowing effect of the micro-drill on the exit burr is very limited, but the improvement effect due to the effective front angle and the change of the cutting thickness still exists, so it can still be seen that the exit burr length is smaller after loading ultrasound than when it is not loaded.
In summary, ultrasonic-assisted vibration drilling has improved the micro-hole roughness, entrance burr, and exit burr defects of printed circuit boards, proving the effectiveness of ultrasonic vibration drilling.
4.2 Orthogonal experiment of ultrasonic-assisted drilling of high-speed circuit board
Prior to the orthogonal experiments, single-factor experiments for parameter optimization were also conducted in this paper, and the parameters and results are shown in the following table.
Table 4
Micro-hole roughness and Entrance Burrs results of the single-factor experiments for optimization of ultrasonic processing parameters (25% ultrasonic power).
Number
|
Spindle speed
(krpm)
|
Feed rate
(mm/s)
|
Micro-hole roughness
(µm)
|
Entrance Burrs (µm)
|
1
|
110
|
28
|
5.837
|
19.33
|
2
|
110
|
34
|
4.930
|
23.00
|
3
|
110
|
41
|
5.133
|
6.333
|
4
|
145
|
28
|
6.353
|
11.67
|
5
|
145
|
34
|
5.553
|
11.78
|
6
|
145
|
41
|
6.513
|
17.89
|
7
|
170
|
28
|
7.073
|
14.00
|
8
|
170
|
34
|
8.437
|
13.89
|
9
|
170
|
41
|
8.797
|
16.89
|
To facilitate comparison and get more intuitive analysis results, the data results of micro-hole roughness and entrance burr cases are plotted as the following surface plots to study respectively, and the surface distribution is the data results in µm.
Analysis of Fig. 15 shows that although increasing the feed speed can also suppress the burr formation to some extent, this effect can be confused with the improvement of burr by ultrasonic vibration assistance, and increasing the feed speed also leads to a rise in hole roughness, so the range of feed speed is adjusted downward during parameter optimization. Analysis of Fig. 16 shows that the best value of micro-hole roughness occurs at a lower spindle speed, and the trend of the effect of speed on burr is not obvious in this group of experimental data, and the value of burr length fluctuates with the change of feed speed at a lower spindle speed.
The optimization results of the machining parameters under ultrasonic-assisted vibration drilling were obtained as shown in the Table 5.
Table 5
Parameters of orthogonal experiment of ultrasonic-assisted drilling of high-speed circuit board.
Experimental factors
|
Level
|
Spindle speed (krpm)
|
100、130、160
|
Feed rate (mm/s)
|
21、27、33
|
Ultrasonic power
|
0、25%、45%
|
Finally, an orthogonal test was performed based on this parameter. Since it was found that the ultrasonic-assisted technique also had an improvement effect on the generation of nail head (circuit board copper layer thickness of 30 µm) when drilling high-speed circuit boards, the nail head were also included in the evaluation criteria for micro-hole quality, and a three-index L9(33) orthogonal test was conducted, and the Table 6 was obtained after compiling the results.
Table 6
Orthogonal experiment results of ultrasonic-assisted drilling.
Number
|
Spindle speed
(krpm)
|
Feed rate
(mm/s)
|
Ultrasonic power
|
Micro-hole roughness
(µm)
|
Entrance burrs
(µm)
|
Nail head
(µm)
|
1
|
100
|
21
|
0
|
9.785
|
17.14
|
50.67
|
2
|
100
|
27
|
25%
|
5.177
|
5.488
|
37.56
|
3
|
100
|
33
|
45%
|
4.737
|
10.11
|
41.26
|
4
|
130
|
21
|
25%
|
4.577
|
6.132
|
39.73
|
5
|
130
|
27
|
45%
|
5.196
|
12.12
|
43.85
|
6
|
130
|
33
|
0
|
12.40
|
15.70
|
53.82
|
7
|
160
|
21
|
45%
|
5.137
|
13.78
|
46.41
|
8
|
160
|
27
|
0
|
8.258
|
19.56
|
51.79
|
9
|
160
|
33
|
25%
|
5.236
|
7.408
|
41.39
|
First, the results of the orthogonal experiments were analyzed by polar difference analysis. The polar difference (R) indicates the magnitude of the change of the experimental index within the range of the value of the factor, and the larger the R value is, the greater the influence of the level change of the factor on the experimental index. The results of the analysis for microporous roughness, entrance burr and nail head are shown in Tables 7, 8 and 9, respectively.
Table 7
Micro-hole roughness polarization analysis for ultrasonic-assisted drilling orthogonal experiment.
Results
|
Spindle speed
|
Feed rate
|
Ultrasonic power
|
K1
|
19.699
|
19.499
|
30.443
|
K2
|
22.173
|
18.631
|
14.99
|
K3
|
18.631
|
22.373
|
15.07
|
k1
|
6.566
|
6.500
|
10.15
|
k2
|
7.391
|
6.210
|
4.997
|
k3
|
6.210
|
7.458
|
5.023
|
Range
|
1.181
|
1.248
|
5.153
|
Order of influence
|
Ultrasonic power > Feed rate > Spindle speed
|
Optimal level
|
160krpm
|
27mm/s
|
25%
|
Optimal combination
|
A3B2C2
|
The results show that the most influential factor on the micro-hole roughness results is the ultrasonic power, and the feed rate and spindle speed have a similar influence. From the derived better levels of each factor, the lowest micro-hole roughness values can be obtained at spindle speed of 160 krpm, feed speed of 27 mm/s and ultrasonic intensity of 25%, i.e., when the feed speed is reduced to 27 mm/s during ultrasonic vibration, the high frequency vibration and feed motion of the micro-drill pulls less on the glass fiber inside the hole, and the ultrasonic plowing effect on it is very good, while the trend of the ultrasonic power part is similar to The results of the previous single-factor test are similar, too high ultrasonic power, that is, when the ultrasonic amplitude is too high instead of slightly reducing the hole wall quality, so loading 25% intensity of ultrasonic vibration can get the best results, reducing 50.8%.
Table 8
Entrance burrs polarization analysis for ultrasonic-assisted drilling orthogonal experiment.
Results
|
Spindle speed
|
Feed rate
|
Ultrasonic power
|
K1
|
32.738
|
37.082
|
52.40
|
K2
|
33.952
|
37.28
|
19.028
|
K3
|
40.748
|
33.218
|
36.01
|
k1
|
10.91
|
12.36
|
17.47
|
k2
|
11.32
|
12.39
|
6.343
|
k3
|
13.58
|
11.07
|
12.00
|
Range
|
2.67
|
1.32
|
11.127
|
Order of influence
|
Ultrasonic power > Spindle speed > Feed rate
|
Optimal level
|
100krpm
|
33mm/s
|
25%
|
Optimal combination
|
A1B3C2
|
The results show that the most influential factor on the entrance burr length is still the ultrasonic power, followed by the spindle speed. From the derived better levels of each factor, the smallest entrance burr length is obtained at spindle speed of 100 krpm, feed rate of 33 mm/s and ultrasonic intensity of 25%. The trend in the spindle speed and feed rate sections is not quite the same as the micro-hole roughness because the entrance burr is mainly formed by the flow plastic deformation of the copper foil material at the edge of the hole, while the micro-hole roughness is determined by the processing condition of the material inside the hole. The higher feed rate affects the processing quality of the material inside the hole, but the copper foil at the orifice still has a better processing quality under ultrasonic vibration. The ultrasonic power also gives the smallest burr length at 25%, but in fact, it can be seen from the calculated ki value that the difference between 25% level and 45% level is only 7.2%, while the difference with and without ultrasonic loading is 47.1%, which is enough to prove the improvement effect of ultrasonic vibration loading on the entrance burr.
Table 9
Nail head polarization analysis for ultrasonic-assisted drilling orthogonal experiment.
Results
|
Spindle speed
|
Feed rate
|
Ultrasonic power
|
K1
|
129.49
|
136.81
|
156.28
|
K2
|
137.4
|
133.2
|
118.68
|
K3
|
139.59
|
136.47
|
131.52
|
k1
|
43.16
|
45.60
|
52.09
|
k2
|
45.8
|
44.4
|
39.56
|
k3
|
46.53
|
45.49
|
43.84
|
Range
|
3.37
|
1.2
|
12.53
|
Order of influence
|
Ultrasonic power > Spindle speed > Feed rate
|
Optimal level
|
100krpm
|
27mm/s
|
25%
|
Optimal combination
|
A1B2C2
|
The results show that the most influential factor on the nail head length remains the ultrasonic power, followed by the spindle speed. From the resulting optimal level of each factor, the smallest nail head length was obtained at a spindle speed of 100 krpm, a feed rate of 27 mm/s, and an ultrasonic intensity of 25%. This is because the nail head is actually a flow plastic deformation of the copper foil layer material, but it occurs in the hole, and the principle of its generation is very similar to that of the entrance burr, and the ultrasonic vibration loading has a similar principle of their improvement. The improvement effect of the spindle speed is still very obvious.
Table 10
Comparison of the impact of factors for each indicator.
Parameter
|
Order of influence
|
Optimal combination
|
Micro-hole roughness
|
Ultrasonic power > Feed rate > Spindle speed
|
A3B2C2
|
Entrance burrs
|
Ultrasonic power > Spindle speed > Feed rate
|
A1B3C2
|
Nail head
|
Ultrasonic power > Spindle speed > Feed rate
|
A1B2C2
|
Since the optimal combinations obtained from the extreme difference analysis of the three influencing factors are not exactly the same, they also need to be judged by comparing the order of their influences. As shown in Table 10, there is no doubt that the ultrasonic power (factor C) has the greatest influence, with a better level of 25% for both. The spindle speed (factor A), which has the second influence on both the entrance burr and the nail head, is only 5.7% different from the feed speed and spindle speed as calculated in the micro-hole roughness extreme difference analysis, so the spindle speed is taken as the second criterion in the combination of the better process parameters, and the first level, i.e. 100krpm, is selected as the best value for both the entrance burr and the nail head. It can be concluded that the best combination of parameters for ultrasonic vibration-assisted drilling to obtain the best overall drilling quality is spindle speed of 100 krpm, feed rate of 27 mm/s and ultrasonic intensity of 25%.
In addition, the effect of ultrasonic vibration assisted drilling can also be demonstrated by the change of chip morphology, combined with the conclusion obtained in the previous theoretical study of ultrasonic-assisted drilling process: ultrasonic vibration increases the proportion of short continuous chips, ribbon chips and broken chips in the chips, as shown in Fig. 17, which leads to the improvement of material removal and chip discharge in the hole, which is finally reflected in the processing quality of micro-hole. quality.
Then, the results of the orthogonal experiments were also analyzed by ANOVA, and the results of the analysis of the three influencing factors were tallied into the ANOVA table shown below.
Table 11
ANOVA of Micro-hole roughness during ultrasonic-assisted drilling.
Parameter
|
Sum of square
|
Degree of freedom
|
Meansquare
|
F
|
Fa
|
Significance level
|
Spindle speed
|
2.202
|
2
|
1.101
|
0.499
|
F0.5(2,2) = 1
|
|
Feed rate
|
2.558
|
2
|
1.279
|
0.580
|
F0.5(2,2) = 1
|
|
Ultrasonic power
|
52.796
|
2
|
26.398
|
11.975
|
F0.1(2,2) = 9
|
*
|
Residual
|
4.409
|
2
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
Table 12
ANOVA of entrance burrs during ultrasonic-assisted drilling.
Parameter
|
Sum of square
|
Degree of freedom
|
Meansquare
|
F
|
Fa
|
Significance level
|
Spindle speed
|
12.414
|
2
|
6.207
|
25.831
|
F0.05(2,2) = 19
|
**
|
Feed rate
|
3.360
|
2
|
1.680
|
6.991
|
F0.5(2,2) = 1
|
*
|
Ultrasonic power
|
185.591
|
2
|
92.796
|
386.167
|
F0.01(2,2) = 99
|
***
|
Residual
|
0.481
|
2
|
0.240
|
|
|
|
Table 13
ANOVA of Nail head during ultrasonic-assisted drilling.
Parameter
|
Sum of square
|
Degree of freedom
|
Meansquare
|
F
|
Fa
|
Significance level
|
Spindle speed
|
18.886
|
2
|
9.443
|
4.436
|
F0.5(2,2) = 1
|
*
|
Feed rate
|
2.647
|
2
|
1.323
|
0.622
|
F0.5(2,2) = 1
|
|
Ultrasonic power
|
243.581
|
2
|
121.790
|
57.214
|
F0.05(2,2) = 19
|
**
|
Residual
|
4.257
|
2
|
2.129
|
|
|
|
According to the analysis of the results of the significance test, after excluding the influence caused by random errors, the significant level of ultrasonic intensity is still the highest, and all three ANOVAs show that ultrasonic intensity has a significant effect on the machining quality of micro-hole, while the significance of spindle speed ranks second and the significance level of feed speed is lower, but all three have an effect on machining quality, and the most obvious effect on the entrance burr situation.
In summary, the ultrasonic assisted technology has very obvious improvement on several machining defects such as micro-hole roughness, entrance burr and nail head cases, and they have the same effect when the ultrasonic intensity is changed, and the spindle speed and feed rate have less obvious effect on machining quality than the ultrasonic power, but still a better combination of parameters can be obtained by extreme difference analysis. More importantly, the research method is not only applicable to PCBs in experiments, but provides a way to obtain the primary and secondary order and optimal level combinations of the effects of each parameter on the quality of micro-hole.