The results of the training are presented in three sections, comprising participant characteristics, training program feasibility and acceptability, and perceived outcomes.
Participant characteristics
12 service users, 12 caregivers and 18 health professionals attended and completed the training and provided response to the program assessments. Socio-demographic data for participants is presented in Table2. To maintain anonymity, the participants were represented with identification numbers to describe their qualitative accounts in the results, for example service user (e.g. SU1, SU2), caregiver (e.g. CG1, CG2) or health professionals (HP1, HP2).
Table 2.Participants’ socio-demographic information
Characteristics
|
Service users
|
Caregivers
|
Health professionals
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
Male
|
6
|
5
|
15
|
Female
|
6
|
7
|
3
|
Age (years)
|
|
|
|
20-25
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
26-30
|
0
|
3
|
4
|
31-35
|
3
|
2
|
6
|
36-40
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
41+
|
6
|
5
|
2
|
Educational attainment
|
|
|
|
Non-literate
|
4
|
7
|
0
|
Informal Education
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Primary School
|
6
|
1
|
0
|
Secondary School
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
Diploma
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
First degree
|
0
|
0
|
13
|
Years of work experience or caring or living with mental health condition
|
|
|
|
1-5years
|
5
|
5
|
3
|
6-10years
|
3
|
3
|
8
|
11-15years
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
16+years
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
Training program feasibility and acceptability
Feasibility
Feasibility of the training program was supported by high enrolment, training completion and response to the training assessment by all eligible service users (12/12), caregivers (12/12) and health professionals (18/20)(See Table 3). Moreover, all participants who enrolled attended all sessions, except one who missed one session because of a competing commitment.
Table 3.Training program feasibility and acceptability indicators
Indicators
|
Service uses
|
Caregivers
|
Health professionals
|
Indicators of feasibility
|
|
|
|
Participants invited to participate in the training
|
12
|
12
|
20
|
Participants enrolled in training
|
12
|
12
|
18
|
Participants attended all the sessions
|
12
|
11
|
18
|
Participants completed the sessions
|
12
|
12
|
18
|
Indicators of acceptability
|
|
|
|
Number of participants who reported that their expectations had been fulfilled:
|
|
|
|
Strongly agree
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
Agree
|
2
|
1
|
6
|
Number of participants who reported that the training of high standard:
|
|
|
|
Strongly agree
|
9
|
11
|
11
|
Agree
|
3
|
1
|
7
|
The analysis of the qualitative datasets (open-ended questions, interviews: exit and follow-up) strongly supported the feasibility of the training programme. The participants reported only a few challenges to attending the training program. These logistical issues included challenges with transportation, accommodation, overlap with their regular duties, and health challenges.
I attended all the training attentively with interest. The time schedule was good and it did not waste our time. (SU20, Exit interview)
I attended all the ten days, previously I used to feel health problems all the days, but there was no problem during the training. I saw changes [health] in this regard. (SU3, Exit interview)
Only one participant (coming from a rural area) reported challenges related to transportation and weather conditions that affected attendance.
Sometimes I was delayed getting transportation and when there was rain we did not get transport, but there was nothing else. (CG20, follow-up interview)
Some participants coming from rural areas reported challenges related to accessing a power supply to charge the digital cameras. Notwithstanding the affirmative feedback about the training content and values, almost all health professionals indicated areas where the training programme could be improved in terms of time and supplementary reading materials.
The training was very nice, but the time was very short. If the time was longer we could have discussed many points. The trainer covered a lot of key points in [a] very short time. (HP13, Response to open-ended questions)
Acceptability
The quantitative analysis indicated that the majority of participants reported strong agreement (31/42) or agreement (11/42) that the training was of a high standard and that their expectations had been fulfilled (strongly agree=33/42; agree=9/42) (See Table3).This positive feedback was captured in the qualitative data in participants’ accounts about the adequacy of the training content, recommendations about how the training could be improved, and the most useful aspects of the training.
Almost all participants mentioned that the training included many useful topics, and their expectations were largely met. They described the training program using words and phrases like ‘interesting’, ‘very nice’, ‘very relevant’, ‘very useful/helpful’, ‘very happy’, and one participant said “This lesson cannot be gained even by paying for it,” (CG12-Follow-up interview). Many of the participants recommended no change or additional topics to the training program, except three participants who wanted to additionally receive training about income generation (SU11, SU21,CG4).
I am very happy about the training; the issues discussed were very important. The recommendations and solutions raised during the training should be changed into practice involving all stakeholders (HP6, Response to open-ended questions)
The training contained many useful topics. It helps to learn how to properly use medication, and how to teach other people. It helps to clearly learn from others’ stories, for example about how to avoid alcohol use and factors that worsen mental illness. (CG 22, Exit interview)
Almost all participants recommended the need for expansion of the training programme to reach more people, including involving more people with lived experiences and engaging community stakeholders. The service users also expressed their readiness to share what they had gained from the training and their lived experiences.
This training was provided for 12 service users and 12 caregivers. They should share the knowledge to many people. The training program should be supported by governmental and non-government organizations to reach many people. For example, if teachers participate in the training, the lesson can reach many people. (CG12. Follow-up interviews)
The participants appreciated the different activities and interactive training techniques, including case scenarios analysis and PAR photovoice recovery narratives, which were considered to encourage collaborative learning, share experiences and made training understandable.
The service users actively participated by capturing and describing photos and this made the training very clear to understand. This training included many things and was unusual. There were photographs, videos, and people with the mental health conditions shared their experiences throughout the training. I liked it very much. (CG 24, Exit interview)
The PhotoVoice was helpful to express idea easily. It nicely helped me to express my ideas. I am very happy talking about my experiences to others. (SU21, Exit interview)
Perceived outcomes of the training programme
Improved understanding/knowledge
The descriptive analysis of the retrospective pre-test responses showed that increased numbers of participants reported higher understanding levels after the training than before (see Additional file1 and Table 4).
Table4. Descriptive statistics of training program understanding after and before the training
|
I understood:
|
Phases
|
N
|
Mean
|
St.d
|
1
|
Why service users and caregivers wanted to be involved in mental health systems strengthening
|
After
|
18
|
4.9
|
0.32
|
Before
|
3.3
|
0.97
|
2
|
The value of service users and caregivers’ involvement in mental health system strengthening
|
After
|
18
|
4.9
|
0.32
|
Before
|
3.3
|
1.09
|
3
|
How to involve service user and caregivers in the different aspects of mental health system strengthening
|
After
|
18
|
4.7
|
0.49
|
Before
|
2.8
|
1.06
|
4
|
How to collaborate with service users and caregivers for mental health system strengthening
|
After
|
18
|
4.8
|
0.43
|
Before
|
3.3
|
1.09
|
5
|
What kinds of contributions service users and their caregivers can make to improve mental care in my district (Sodo district)
|
After
|
42
|
4.6
|
0.59
|
Before
|
3.0
|
1.08
|
6
|
About the international protections (and protections within Ethiopia) for the rights of people with mental health problems
|
After
|
42
|
4.3
|
0.67
|
Before
|
2.9
|
1.30
|
7
|
The experiences of people with mental health conditions in Sodo district
|
After
|
42
|
4.3
|
0.75
|
Before
|
2.7
|
1.27
|
8
|
The levels of service users and caregivers involvement in mental health system strengthening
|
After
|
42
|
4.3
|
0.75
|
Before
|
2.8
|
1.17
|
9
|
Myths and facts about mental illness
|
After
|
42
|
4.6
|
0.59
|
Before
|
3.4
|
1.23
|
10
|
Types of mental health related stigma and discriminations
|
After
|
42
|
4.6
|
0.55
|
Before
|
3.3
|
1.05
|
11
|
Impacts of mental health related stigma and discrimination
|
After
|
42
|
4.6
|
0.54
|
Before
|
3.4
|
1.08
|
12
|
Strategies to reduce mental health related stigma and discrimination
|
After
|
42
|
4.6
|
0.58
|
Before
|
3.0
|
1.19
|
13
|
Types of mental health problems
|
After
|
42
|
4.7
|
0.47
|
Before
|
3.6
|
1.08
|
14
|
Treatments that can help people with mental health problems
|
After
|
42
|
4.6
|
0.54
|
Before
|
3.6
|
1.15
|
15
|
Definition of service user
|
After
|
42
|
4.7
|
0.48
|
Before
|
3.2
|
1.09
|
16
|
Definition of caregiver
|
After
|
42
|
4.6
|
0.50
|
Before
|
3.5
|
1.17
|
17
|
Definition of involvement in mental health system
|
After
|
42
|
4.6
|
0.55
|
Before
|
3.3
|
1.13
|
18
|
How I can contribute to improve mental care in my district (Sodo district)
|
After
|
24
|
4.1
|
0.68
|
Before
|
2.9
|
1.04
|
19
|
How I can contribute to the development of mental health policy and law development in Ethiopia
|
After
|
24
|
4.2
|
0.66
|
Before
|
2.9
|
1.19
|
Consistent with the quantitative findings, the qualitative data supported those participants perceived this training improved their understanding. The participants reported that the PAR photovoice enhanced their active involvement and understanding of the training. The participants reported learning new skills that they could use or are using in various areas.
The training gave us sufficient knowledge about mental illness, medication use and stigma and discrimination. I got good knowledge when I heard their advice (participants sharing lived experiences) and the way they talk. (SU16, Exit interview)
The training had a lot of benefit. When participants presented their experiences of living with mental illness, this becomes a good experience and advice for us [participants]. When they [service users] talk we [participants] were happy. Just when they speak about their past experiences and how well they are doing now it gives hope service user. (CG15, Follow-up interviews)
Besides the improved understanding and skills, the qualitative data highlighted numerous perceived outcomes/benefits of the training programme, including feelings of empowerment, social benefits, and perceived therapeutic benefits.
Sense of empowerment
The participants mentioned the valuable contribution of their participation in the interactive PAR photovoice group activities and having the opportunity to give testimonies to health professionals. For many participants, the social space for sharing their recovery journey, having their views heard, valued and acknowledged by health professionals had led to improved self-confidence, a sense of valued contribution and increased self-worth.
...they (health professionals) were very happy, clapped their hands for us, and they told us to help us [service users and caregivers] if we faced any problem even at night. (CG20, Follow-up interview)
I am very happy having a freedom to discuss with others and sharing my experience about my previous situation. I feel like I rebirth and feel like my age is just like a child. Previously I have suffered a lot… when that time passes and I become to this stage, this is rebirth for me. I am happy. (SU 17, Exit interview)
Perceived social benefits
Almost all participants valued the social benefits of the training programme in terms of improved social acceptance. The participants mentioned the PAR photovoice process helped them to be valued and acknowledged for their lived experiences in the family and community.
We were stigmatized and discriminated by community, no one used to visit us, including our neighbours, and we did not go to other peoples’ homes. After we started participation in this training many people started greeting us. My relatives who used to reject me are now accepting me. People started treating us as human beings. We have hope. God knows the future. (CG7, Exit interview)
In my family no one was looking for me because of my illness. They were wishing my death; no one used to give me even free rain water and considered me as useless. My husband is very nice person and he encouraged me and after my involvement in the training my family started visiting me. (SU11, Exit interview)
The training showed us many good things. I am communicating with my family very well now and they are also asking me to share my ideas with them. They are also accepting my ideas. (SU1, Exit interview)
Although there was improved acceptance of service users in the community, the participants mentioned that more work needed to be done in the community and institutions through awareness creation and involving service-users.
There are many people who stigmatise and discriminate against people with mental illness. They lack understanding about mental illness and people with mental illness. We should provide awareness to all people. (SU 11, Exit interview)
At beginning of the training process, we observed that some participants felt uneasy about sharing their own recovery stories because of being upset due to past unpleasant experiences of discrimination. This problem was anticipated by the trainers before the training started and managed by probing participants to share their personal strengths rather than focus on their personal mental illness. The participants liked the opportunity to meet, spend time and interact with people with similar mental health conditions. The participants welcomed the opportunity to have the time and space to exchange their lived experiences and learn with or from each other. They reported that this created a sense of belonging, strengthened their relationships and stimulated action to establish long-term relationships through getting organized into a grass roots service user association. The participants reported that being organized into an association would support their collective efforts to tackle problems facing people with mental health conditions.
The training process brings people to deeply connect with each other. Our (service users) coming and discussing together enabled us to establish a service users association, and hope that it [association] will be the best association in the Sodo district and the entire country. (CG12, Exit interview)
Perceived therapeutic benefits
Many of the participants reported making changes in their lifestyles and behaviour with perceived therapeutic value because of the knowledge and skills gained from the training. Some reported making changes to unhealthy aspects of their lives, including reducing/stopping alcohol drinking, improved medication use, attending health facilities, improvements in the way they experienced their family relationships and the wider community.
The man (service user) used to be in bed and feeling pain all day; and I was not able to attend meeting even at my neighbourhood. I am very happy for attending this training. The man is effectively taking his medication. The man was a difficult person, but after the training [he] has showed improvement. He started meeting people and participation in social activities. He is started looking for and feeding cattle. The training gives hope. (CG2, Exit interview)
This training was more than taking medication, helpful to change the mind and giving hope about the future. Thanks to God we are here to get involved here. We used to chain her all the days just like a sheep and goat. I remember many people visited and took her photo while she was chained. (CG7, Exit interview)
Many of the service users mentioned involvement in peer support, advocating for human-rights and supportive relationships with health service providers that could help to improve health service quality.
When both of us (service user and caregiver) go to health facility, we don’t feel shameful and [can] freely talk about her (service user) mental health condition without fear. I ask for timely service without waiting for long. They (health professionals) are also serving us with good manner and respect. (CG10, Exit interview)