Which one? A comparative study of traditional and sports uniforms on academic achievement, cognitive performance, playtime, bullying, and discrimination in adolescents. The Cogni-Action Project

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1530775/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Which one? A comparative study of traditional and sports uniforms on academic achievement, cognitive performance, playtime, bullying, and discrimination in adolescents. The Cogni-Action Project

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1530775/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare academic achievement, cognitive performance, playtime, bullying, and discrimination in adolescents according to traditional (TU) and sports uniforms (SU) worn at school, while simultaneously exploring the influence of the school vulnerability index.

Methods

Nine hundred eighty-eight Chilean adolescents (52.6% boys) aged 10–14 years participated in this cross-sectional study. Academic achievement was evaluated by the average grade in maths, language, and science grades, while the cognitive performance was assessed through eight cognitive tasks. TU affecting physical activity, playtime, bullying, and discrimination were queried. Mixed model analyses were performed.

Results

No differences were observed in academic achievement (TU: 5.4 ± 0.1 vs. SU: 5.5 ± 0.2, p-value = 0.785) or in cognitive performance (TU: 99.6 ± 0.8 vs. SU: 98.9 ± 1.8, p-value = 0.754) according to school uniform type. Moreover, 64.1% of participants declared that wearing TU affects their physical activity, and those who believed so spent more time playing than those who answered negatively (14.5 min, p-value = 0.012). Finally, adolescents wearing SU displayed a lower feeling of bullying and discrimination; this finding depended mainly on the school’s vulnerability.

Conclusion

It is concluded that wearing a TU does not show an educational advantage at an academic and cognitive level that justifies its obligation. In addition, it could be suggested that schools consider adolescents’ opinions in adopting a more comfortable uniform, such as the SU. This feasible and low-cost measure would help to increase adolescents' physical activity during the school day and, contrary to belief, it would not be related to increased feelings of bullying and discrimination.

Preventive Medicine

education

health

students

physical activity

policy

mental health

School uniforms have an important social context; in fact, in New Zealand, it is a reason why students choose their schools¹, but in general, uniforms have been adopted as strategies by principals and governments to improve educational test scores and student behaviour^2,3. Indeed, several studies have suggested that traditional uniforms remove social differences, increase security, reduce violence, improve school climate and discipline, promote social responsibility, and improve academic achievement^2,4−8. However, findings on this matter are highly sparse and heterogeneous and seem to be dependent on the population studied, age, race, educational context, and socioeconomic status^2,3,6,9,10, and of the aforementioned features have not been proven yet^3,6,7.

Due to COVID-19, many schools have performed their classes virtually, and uniforms have not been mandatory. Moreover, this global health concern has been generating economic harm at the social and family levels¹¹; thus, many schools and families have begun to question its use. Overall, school uniforms limit self-expression, are expensive, and most schools require that families buy several uniforms (i.e., for winter, summer, sports, formal occasions) even from specific shops^8,12,13. Furthermore, in some countries like Chile, not wearing a traditional uniform has been used as a reason for school expulsion, contravening current national regulations¹⁴.

A recent review has identified three main topics related to wearing school uniforms (i.e., impact on academic achievement, physical, and psychological health)⁶, all of which are relevant for generating social and educational policy, especially in vulnerable communities⁶. In this sense, Latin-American schools share certain features (i.e., economic, social, and cultural status) that seem to be stronger predictors of adolescents’ academic and cognitive performance than family socioeconomic status¹⁵. Indeed, a study in Chilean adolescents showed that a potent socioeconomic indicator at school level (i.e., the school vulnerability index [SVI]) was negatively related to physical fitness and cognitive performance¹⁶. Moreover, economic, social, and cultural status related to the school climate¹⁷, which in turn promoted greater learning and reduced bullying and conflicts among students¹⁸. To date, there is a lack of studies exploring differences between types of uniforms and their effect on academic, cognitive, physical activity, and psychological indicators such as bullying and discrimination feelings in the same student sample.

Therefore, this study was divided into three objectives. First, to determine whether adolescents wearing traditional uniforms present higher educational achievements (i.e., academic achievement and cognitive performance) than if they were wearing sports uniforms. Second, playtime according to the uniform type was explored regarding whether traditional uniforms affect adolescents’ physical activity. Third, to compare feelings of bullying and discrimination at school according to the uniform worn. Finally, based on the relevance of socioeconomic factors, it was hypothesised that possible differences between groups depend mainly on the SVI (a proxy of socioeconomic indicators at school level) rather than the uniform type.

Study design and ethical requirements

This cross-sectional study is part of the Cogni-Action Project carried out from March 2017 to October 2019¹⁹. The project was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Bioethics and Biosafety Committee of the Ethics Committee of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (BIOEPUCV-H103–2016). Written consents were obtained before participation from the school principal, parents, and participants.

Participants

A total of 1,296 adolescents, between the ages of 10 and 14, from 19 public, subsidised (i.e., schools that receive partially governmental and private economic support), and private schools of the Valparaiso region (Chile) participated in this study. From the 1,296 participants, a total of 308 adolescents were removed because their school (k = 4) wore a mixture of uniforms (a detailed explanation in the next section). Thus, a total of 988 adolescents participated in this study from 15 schools (k = 12 schools wearing traditional uniforms and k = 3 schools wearing sports uniforms).

School uniform type

Traditional uniforms: schools that declare their students wear a traditional uniform all weekdays except for physical education classes in which adolescents wear sports uniforms. A traditional uniform for male adolescents was outlined as a polo shirt or shirt (with school necktie), sweater or blazer and trousers, and for girls, a skirt and blouse, and sweater or blazer, both with school shoes (usually black leather).

Sports uniforms: schools that declare their students wear sports uniforms every day. A sports uniform consisted of adolescents (both boys and girls) wearing mainly sportswear such as polo shirts or t-shirts and sport or short trousers (jeans were included as well in this category due to their generalised wearing), and sneakers.

Mix uniforms: Four schools were excluded due to adolescents wearing traditional uniforms most days but sports uniforms during the day when they have physical education classes.

Educational achievements: Academic achievement and cognitive performance

Academic achievement was established by asking students their general average of the last semester in language, mathematics, and science and were averaged. Grades in Chile are scored between 1 (minimum) and 7 (maximum) in which a grade of 4 implies approval. These three subjects are part of the Programme for International Student Assessment.

The adolescents’ cognitive performance was evaluated through eight neurocognitive tasks from the NeuroCognitive Performance Test (NCPT) from Lumos Labs, Inc²⁰. This battery included: “Trail Making A and B” assessing attention, cognitive flexibility, and processing speed; the “Forward Memory Span” and the “Reverse Memory Span” evaluating short-term visual memory and working memory; the “Go/No-Go” test, assessing inhibitory control and processing speed; the “Balance Scale,” indicating quantitative and analogical reasoning; the “Digit Symbol Coding,” valuing processing speed; and finally, the “Progressive Matrices,” assessing problem-solving and reasoning/intelligence²⁰. Each test was scaled following a normal inverse transformation of the percentile rank and summed²¹ obtaining a global cognitive score.

Playtime

Playtime was estimated by the Chilean physical activity questionnaire validated in the population aged 8–13 years-old²². Adolescents were asked about several physical activities. For this study, only a playtime item was considered. This item asks about daily play (hours and min) in activities such as riding a bicycle, ball games, running, etc.

Perception of traditional uniforms affecting physical activity

Adolescents were asked about the daily influence of traditional uniforms on physical activity levels. They respond ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’ to the following question: Do you think that wearing a traditional uniform in school affects your physical activity? The interviewers explained that the question refers to a decrease in the levels of physical activity during the school day.

Suffered bullying and discrimination

Based on the questionnaire “Validation of a daily stress scale in Chilean schoolchildren”²³, we extract two questions: 1) Have you suffered bullying in the classroom or in the schoolyard? and 2) Have you suffered discrimination in the classroom or the school playground?²³.Each question scores from 1 to 4 concerning the frequency of the event (never: 1, sometimes: 2, usually: 3, and always: 4).

Covariates

Six covariates (age, sex, maturation, physical fitness, BMI, and SVI) were included in the analyses because of relevance and relationship with outcomes. It has been stated that sex and maturation are relevant factors associated with behaviours, cognitive, and brain development²⁴. The maturation was calculated according to the peak height velocity (PHV), subtracting the PHV age from the chronological age. Differences among years were established as maturity offset value²⁵.

Physical fitness was evaluated by the ALPHA-fitness test battery²⁶, which comprises the assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular fitness, and speed-agility fitness. A z-score of each component was calculated adjusted for age and sex, and all three were added. Procedures and methodological details were published previously²¹.

The height and weight were measured with a digital scale OMRON (HN-289-LA, Kyoto, Japan) with a precision of 0.1 kg and a portable stadiometer SECA (model 213, GmbH, Germany) with a precision of 0.1 cm, respectively. The World Health Organisation 2007 growth reference was used to determine the body mass index expressed in z-score (BMI_Z) for school-age children²⁷.

Additionally, SVI was included as a proxy of a socioeconomic factor at school level (model 2). This Chilean index measures the degree of socioeconomic vulnerability of pupils who attend schools with partial or total state funding (subsidised and public schools, respectively) based on the educational level of parents-tutors, student health condition, physical and emotional wellbeing, and school location. This index score ranges from 0 to 100, a score of zero being assigned to the private schools, thus schools were classified as low (< 10), middle (≥ 10 to < 60), and high (≥ 60)²⁸.

Statistical analysis

Before analyses, data were imputed based on a non-parametric missing value method using random forest through the “missForest” R package²⁹. This function successfully imputes large and complex mixed-type datasets (quantitative and/or categorical variables), including complex interactions and non-linear relations by a random forest trained on the observed values predicting the missing values. Missing data ranges were between 1.0–27.0% and estimation error was 0.081 (numeric variables) and 0.082 (factor variables). The central limit theorem for sample sizes over 500 participants was considered³⁰. A Q-Q plot (quantile-quantile plot) was used for checking normality visually. Additionally, we explore a possible interaction by sex and age. No interaction was observed; thus, analyses were not stratified by sex or age. Differences between groups were tested (t-test or chi-square according to variable features).

Mixed model analyses were performed to establish differences between traditional and sports uniforms at the academic and cognitive performance, between those who respond that traditional uniforms affect their physical activity level (yes/no) at playtime, and finally at bullying and discrimination feelings. To compare the likelihood of a model with the effect included versus a model with the effect excluded, the likelihood-ratio test (LTR) for the random effect was estimated. A significant value indicates that the model with random effect is significantly better (in terms of likelihood) than the model without the cluster. Post-hoc tests were estimated using the Holm correction to multiple comparisons. For all analyses, significant values were established at p < 0.05. All models were adjusted for multiple covariates. Model 1 included sex, PHV, BMIz, and physical fitness, while model 2 added the SVI in order to test the study hypothesis. Adolescent schools (k = 15) were used as clusters (random effect). All statistical analyses were conducted using the General, Mixed and Generalised Models module by Gallucci (2019)³¹. We present plots to simplify the main findings; however, complete tables with both models are presented as supplementary material. Proportion test (2 outcomes) was used to establish differences in frequency response (yes/no) to the question: “Do you think that wearing a traditional uniform in school affects your physical activity?”. Moreover, contingency tables and X² tests were carried out to describe and corroborate, respectively, differences between answer categories for bullying and discrimination. All analyses were performed using the statistical software Jamovi version 2.0.0.0 (The Jamovi Project)³².

Table 1 shows the descriptive characteristics of the sample. In this study, a total of 988 adolescents participated, of them, 854 (86.4%) wore a traditional uniform (k = 12 schools) and 134 (13.6%) wore a sports uniform (k = 3 schools). Schools where adolescents wear traditional uniforms were public (k = 7), subsidised (k = 4), and private (k = 1), and nine presented high-SVI, two middle-SVI, and one low-SVI, while schools where adolescents wear sports uniforms were subsidised (k = 2) and private (k = 1), and two presented middle-SVI and one low-SVI.

Table 1

Descriptive participant’s characteristics.
	All	Traditional uniforms	Sports uniforms
Variable	(n = 988)	(n = 854)	(n = 134)	p-value
Age (years)	11.8 ± 1.2	11.8 ± 1.2	11.8 ± 1.2	0.893
Sex (n, %)				0.512
Boys	520 (52.6%)	453 (53.0%)	67 (50.0%)
Girls	468 (47.4%)	401 (47.0%)	67 (50.0%)
Weight (kg)	50.1 ± 12.1	50.0 ± 12.3	50.1 ± 11.0	0.387
Height (cm)	151.9 ± 9.3	151.5 ± 9.2	154.7 ± 9.2	< 0.001
Peak Heigh Velocity (score)	-0.58 ± 1.2	-0.60 ± 1.2	-0.50 ± 1.3	0.397
Body Mass Index (z-score)	1.08 ± 1.1	1.09 ± 1.1	0.97 ± 0.96	0.204
Academic achievement	5.42 ± 0.7	5.40 ± 0.7	5.60 ± 0.7	0.022
Cognitive performance (score)	99.4 ± 8.7	99.0 ± 8.8	101.4 ± 7.6	0.003
Physical fitness (z-score)	-0.29 ± 2.8	-0.36 ± 2.8	0.12 ± 2.7	0.068
Data are presented as mean ± SD or frequency (%) according to variable features. P-value: significant differences between groups (t-test or chi-square according to variable features).

Figure 1A shows no significant differences between uniform types in academic achievement (random effect LTR was 44.0; p-value <0.001). Figure 1B displays no significant differences between uniform types in cognitive performance (random effect LTR was 21.7; p-value <0.001). Consistent results were found using model 1 and model 2 in both analyses (see supplementary material).

For the question, “Do you think that wearing a traditional uniform in school affects your physical activity?”, 64.1% of adolescents believe that the traditional uniform affects it (proportion test, p < 0.01). Those that responded affirmatively play 14.5 min more than those who respond negatively (p = 0.012). Moreover, considering only those who responded affirmatively showed higher playtime than those who responded negatively (traditional uniforms: +8 min and sports uniforms: +20 min, both p > 0.05, and random effect LTR was 0.11; p-value = 0.739). Consistent results were found using model 1 and model 2 (see supplementary material).

Figure 3A shows no significant differences between uniform types in feeling of bullying (random effect LTR was 8.20; p-value < 0.01; see supplementary material). Consistent results were found using model 1 and model 2, but there is a trend in model 1 (p = 0.064). While Fig. 3B displays no significant discrimination differences between groups in model 2 (random effect LTR was 7.60; p-value < 0.01), a higher discrimination feeling was found in adolescents wearing traditional uniforms in model 1 (traditional uniforms: 1.41 ± 0.05 vs. sports uniforms: 1.13 ± 0.11, p-value = 0.041). The random effect LTR was 23.76; p-value < 0.01.

Tables 2 and 3 show the proportion of responses with regard to bullying and discrimination feelings of adolescents wearing traditional or sports uniforms. Significant differences in answer frequency according to bullying and discrimination feelings (X² = 10.7; p = 0.012 and X² = 10.3; p < 0.001, respectively). Lower answer frequency is observed in “usually” and “always” categories in schools wearing sports uniforms, both bullying and discrimination.

Table 2

Contingency table for bullying feelings.
	Traditional uniforms	Sports uniforms	Total
Never	407 (54.3%)	84 (65.6%)	491 (56.0%)
Sometimes	252 (33.6%)	40 (31.3%)	292 (33.3%)
Usually	65 (8.7%)	3 (2.3%)	68 (7.8%)
Always	25 (3.3%)	1 (0.8%)	26 (3.0%)
Total	749 (100%)	128 (100%)	877 (100%)
Data are presented as frequency (% within column).

Table 3

Contingency table for discrimination feelings.
	Traditional uniforms	Sports uniforms	Total
Never	560 (74.2%)	115 (89.1%)	675 (76.4%)
Sometimes	141 (18.7%)	14 (10.9%)	155 (17.5%)
Usually	31 (4.1%)	0 (0.0%)	31 (3.5%)
Always	23 (3.0%)	0 (0.0%)	23 (2.6%)
Total	755 (100%)	129 (100%)	884 (100%)
Data are presented as frequency (% within column).

Differences in academic achievement and cognitive performance

The first aim was to establish whether adolescents who wear traditional uniforms present higher academic and cognitive performance than those who wear sports uniforms. The present findings did not find any significant differences in both educational outcomes.

In line with our findings, a Korean study that explored the link between uniforms and appearance restrictions in middle schools and high schools found no evidence that wearing school uniforms leads to better academic achievement and reported that uniforms would deny the expression of individuality and creativity³³. Concerning creativity, it is an essential cognitive resource that is fundamental in the learning processes. In this line, a meta-analysis including 120 studies concludes a significantly stronger relationship between creativity and academic achievement³⁴; thus, traditional uniform wearing could influence both cognitive skills and, in turn, academic achievement. Nonetheless, wearing traditional uniforms also could improve children's discipline, which was associated with a higher academic performance³⁵.

To our knowledge, this is the first study in a sample of Latin-American adolescents exploring both educational outcomes and type of uniform, and the lack of studies related to this topic makes the comparison difficult. Therefore, the present findings contribute to clarifying the scarce and divergent evidence on this matter.⁶ They also demonstrate that, independently of relevant covariates related to academic and cognitive performance, such as physical fitness, body composition, maturation, and school vulnerability, wearing a traditional uniform was not related to educational outcomes.

Student’s perception and differences in playtime

The second aim was to ask adolescents whether wearing a traditional uniform affects their physical activity, and their answers were compared to playtime according to the type of uniform. Two relevant findings were observed; first, 64.1% of adolescents declared that traditional uniforms affect their physical activity negatively. The second, those who responded affirmatively played 14.5 min more than those who responded negatively. Likewise, a difference of 20 min of playtime was detected in adolescents who responded positively to the question and wore sports uniforms (without statistical significance but ).

In line with the first finding, a study in an Australian primary school found similar results, where 62% of schoolchildren preferred to wear their sports uniform every day and believe they would be more active if they could do so³⁶. Moreover, a study in public middle school students found that 87.3% of them dislike wearing a traditional uniform². Hence, the present finding from a Latin-American country confirms the opinion of Australian³⁶ and United States² students contributing to the literature gap in this matter.

Regarding the second finding, the present study highlights two main results, one with a statistical significance (playtime: 14.5 min) and the other without (playtime: 20 min). This has a justification at the public health level relevant to discuss. On the one hand, a study reported significant differences in girls' physical activity levels over boys during breaks and lunch when they wore a sports uniform³⁷. In this line, girls declare that wearing traditional uniforms limits performing physical activities during school time³⁸. These two studies support our findings, but we do not find differences at the sex level, which suggests that both girls and boys in this group of Chilean adolescents could benefit from wearing sports uniforms. On the other hand, adolescents who believe that the traditional uniforms affect their physical activity played 20 min more than those who do not believe so. This non-significant statistical difference could account for a third of the daily physical activity recommendation for children and adolescents³⁹. Although many physical activity interventions in schools have shown modest effects⁴⁰, small modifications are significant for getting health benefits in real contexts^39,40.

Important to highlight is that schools’ principals seem to be a key barrier related to attitudes to changing school uniform policies allowing students to wear sports uniforms every day, but not teachers, parents, and students³⁶. The central concern is that the sports uniform does not fit with ceremonial and formal activities at school. Indeed, in Chile, the school uniform must be agreed upon by principals, teachers, parents and students⁵; however, the traditional uniform is widely worn. Thus, institutional measures supported by government policies are essential to creating the conditions at the interpersonal level to promote behavioural changes in adolescents.

Therefore, the present findings contribute to the literature showing that promoting a comfortable school uniform could help to increase physical activity in adolescents. Interventional approaches are necessary to corroborate this assumption. Moreover, these findings are useful for future internal school regulations, as well as public policies at educational and health levels due to the prevalence of obesity, physical inactivity, low fitness performance, and educational achievement observed especially in schoolchildren from developing countries^41–44.

Bullying and discrimination feelings

The third aim was to compare bullying and discrimination feelings at school according to adolescents’ uniform type. In this sense, the present findings seem contrary to social belief and some studies in this matter^2,6, showing similar feelings between groups in both indicators when the model is adjusted for SVI (model 2).

Bullying and discrimination are a global concern at the educational level. For instance, in Chile, 62% of students have reported having been victims of bullying. This percentage is one of the highest percentages based on countries assessed by the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study − 2011⁴⁵. One central reason is that Chile has one of the highest levels of inequality in Latin America, and its educational system has generated a high level of social segregation among the various types of schools^46,47. These economic and social fundamentals have been associated with a greater prevalence of bullying and, in turn, being a bully victim has been negatively correlated with academic and cognitive performance⁴⁶. However, we cannot establish causality considering bullying as the base of lower educational achievement because there is also the possibility that students who have lower performance choose to bully others⁴⁶.

In addition, a U.S. study including 6,320 children from a nationally representative sample who were followed from kindergarten entry through the end of fifth grade found that those who wore uniforms did not demonstrate better social behaviour (i.e., social skills, internalising, and externalising behaviour)⁴⁸. Relevant to note is that their findings were robust even across both public and private schools. Moreover, another study that compared students’ opinions (n = 604) on the benefits of wearing a school uniform after implementing this measure in a public school in Nevada found a potential effect to improve the school climate and students’ experiences. However, students’ beliefs did not support these changes². In the case of a low-middle-income country (i.e., Mongolia) has reported schoolchildren exclusion feelings when most students wear uniforms in school⁴⁹.

Finally, and connecting this result with the previous finding addressed, the early detection of bullying and discrimination is fundamental as it could strengthen the social relationships among students and improve school coexistence, where physical activity plays a vital role at school⁵⁰. Furthermore, increased physical activity has been associated with reduced bullying victimization, enhanced cognitive performance and academic achievement^21,51,52. Therefore, in this large sample of Chilean adolescents, the kind of uniform wore was not related to bullying and discrimination, solving great social, family, and school principals’ concerns.

Influence of school vulnerability

Finally, it was hypothesised that possible differences in our analyses would depend mainly on the school vulnerability than the uniform type. This assumption was based on the importance and convergence of factors such as socioeconomics, inequality, and the vulnerability index at the school levels in a Latin-American sample of adolescents^16,28,53. Contrary to our hypothesis, model 1 and model 2 seem to be consistent and not affected by the school's vulnerability in academic achievement, cognitive performance, playtime, and bullying.

Nonetheless, discrimination was significantly affected when SVI was not present in the analysis (model 1). In other words, discrimination appreciated by students at schools seems to depend mainly on the social and economic features of the educational establishment and not on the uniform worn. In line with this finding, a study addressing the perceptions of school uniforms with socioeconomic statuses established that students of diverse socioeconomic statuses perceive school uniforms similarly¹⁰. In addition, a multilevel study of school violence in 52 countries concluded that income inequality was the main determinant of school violence⁴⁶. Thereby, future education policies oriented to reduce bullying and discrimination might focus primarily on decreasing social gaps inside and outside the school, and in the specific case of Chile, adolescents' school uniform seems to be not a particular determinant of bullying and discrimination.

Strength and limitations

Some strengths of this study were the large adolescent sample from a usually underrepresented region in this research area and the set of variables included (academic achievement, cognitive performance, playtime, bullying, and discrimination) that contribute to resolving a complex educational topic worldwide. Also, the cognitive performance score based on eight tasks strengthened the study measure. Furthermore, the present statistical analysis permitted control of the effect by cluster and explored a powerful indicator of school vulnerability. Finally, a large group of researchers living in Chile participated and reviewed this study.

Some study limitations were the scarce evidence comparing traditional and sports uniforms and the non- assumption of causality due to the data characteristics. Playtime was evaluated by a self-reported question and not by objective measurement (i.e., accelerometers). Despite the large sample size of adolescents, it is not representative of Chile; hence extrapolations should be made with caution. Finally, the number of schools in each group (traditional or sports uniforms) was different, and schools where adolescents wear sports uniforms do not include any public establishment. In this sense, it is relevant to mention that school type (i.e., administration) has been associated with academic achievements, which could – to a certain extent –-favour schools wearing sports uniforms. In this study, SVI shares variance with the school administration (r = 0.480; p < 0.01), nonetheless SVI is a potent indicator that includes not only the school administration but also other relevant indicators (detailed description in covariates, methods section), being highly related to several variables used in this study^16,28,53

Based on the present findings and scholarly Chilean context, wearing a traditional uniform seems to have no crucial educational advantage at an academic and cognitive level compared to sports uniforms. Therefore, it could be recommended that the school community consider adolescents' opinions and increase instances for promoting a uniform that will be more comfortable such as sports uniforms, which could permit them to increase their physical activity during the school day. Additionally, this feasible and low-cost measure would not be related to higher feelings of bullying and discrimination.

Author Contributions:

CC-M conceived and designed the data analysis and manuscript. CC-M was responsible for coordinating the study, acquiring the data, and writing the first manuscript version. All authors contributed significantly to editing the manuscript and agreed to the final version.

Data Availability Statement:

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available as we did not obtain consent for public release of data.

Acknowledgement

We thank school principals, parents, and adolescents who supported this project. Carlos Cristi-Montero received funding for the Cogni-Action Project from the National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research CONICYT/FONDECYT INICIACION 2016 grant No. 11160703 (Chile).

Conflicts of Interest:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Mandic, S. et al. “I wanted to go here”: Adolescents’ perspectives on school choice. Journal of School Choice 12, 98–122 (2018).
Sanchez, J. E., Yoxsimer, A. & Hill, G. C. Uniforms in the middle school: Student opinions, discipline data, and school police data. Journal of School Violence 11, 345–356 (2012).
Gentile, E. & Imberman, S. A. Dressed for success? The effect of school uniforms on student achievement and behavior. Journal of Urban Economics 71, 1–17 (2012).
King, K. A. Should school uniforms be mandated in elementary schools? The Journal of school health 68, 32 (1998).
Nacional, B. del C. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional | Ley Chile. www.bcn.cl/leychile https://www.bcn.cl/leychile (2009).
Reidy, J. Reviewing School Uniform through a Public Health Lens: Evidence about the Impacts of School Uniform on Education and Health. Public Health Reviews 42, (2021).
Yeung, R. Are school uniforms a good fit? Results from the ECLS-K and the NELS. Educational Policy 23, 847–874 (2009).
Mitchell, H. W. & Knechtle, J. C. Uniforms in public schools and the first amendment: A constitutional analysis. Journal of Negro Education 487–494 (2003).
Bodine, A. School uniforms, academic achievement, and uses of research. The Journal of Educational Research 97, 67–71 (2003).
Jones, A. B., Richardson, M. J., Jensen, B. T. & Whiting, E. F. Perceptions of School Uniforms in Relation to Socioeconomic Statuses. RMLE Online 43, 1–13 (2020).
Nicola, M. et al. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. International journal of surgery 78, 185–193 (2020).
Nordtveit, B. H. Schools as protection?: Reinventing education in contexts of adversity. (Springer, 2016).
Wilken, I. & Van Aardt, A. School Uniforms: Tradition, benefit or predicament? Education as Change 16, 159–184 (2012).
Nacional, B. del C. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional | Ley Chile. www.bcn.cl/leychile https://www.bcn.cl/leychile (2015).
Reátegui Colareta, N. et al. Intelligence measurement and school performance in Latin America: A report of the study of Latin American intelligence project. (2018).
Lemes, V. et al. Physical Fitness Plays a Crucial Mediator Role in Relationships Among Personal, Social, and Lifestyle Factors With Adolescents’ Cognitive Performance in a Structural Equation Model. The Cogni-Action Project. Frontiers in pediatrics 9, (2021).
Delgado-Floody, P., Carter-Thuillier, B., Guzmán-Guzmán, I. P., Latorrre-Román, P. & Caamaño-Navarrete, F. Low indicators of personal and social development in Chilean schools are associated with unimproved academic performance: A national study. International Journal of Educational Research 104, 101651 (2020).
Acosta, J. et al. Understanding the relationship between perceived school climate and bullying: A mediator analysis. Journal of school violence 18, 200–215 (2019).
Solis-Urra, P. et al. Study protocol and rationale of the “Cogni-action project” a cross-sectional and randomized controlled trial about physical activity, brain health, cognition, and educational achievement in schoolchildren. BMC pediatrics 19, 1–16 (2019).
Morrison, G. E., Simone, C. M., Ng, N. F. & Hardy, J. L. Reliability and validity of the NeuroCognitive Performance Test, a web-based neuropsychological assessment. Frontiers in psychology 1652 (2015).
Solis-Urra, P. et al. Physical fitness and its association with cognitive performance in Chilean schoolchildren: The Cogni-Action Project. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 31, 1352–1362 (2021).
Godard, M. C. et al. Value of a clinical test for assessing physical activity in children. Rev Med Chil 136, 1155–62 (2008).
Encina Agurto, Y. J. & Ávila Muñoz, M. V. Validación de una escala de estrés cotidiano en escolares chilenos. Revista de Psicología (PUCP) 33, 363–385 (2015).
Stillman, C. M., Esteban-Cornejo, I., Brown, B., Bender, C. M. & Erickson, K. I. Effects of exercise on brain and cognition across age groups and health states. Trends in neurosciences 43, 533–543 (2020).
Moore, S. A. et al. Enhancing a somatic maturity prediction model. Med Sci Sports Exerc 47, 1755–64 (2015).
Ruiz, J. R. et al. Field-based fitness assessment in young people: the ALPHA health-related fitness test battery for children and adolescents. British journal of sports medicine 45, 518–524 (2011).
Onis, M. de et al. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bulletin of the World health Organization 85, 660–667 (2007).
Cristi-Montero, C. et al. Could physical fitness be considered as a protective social factor associated with bridging the cognitive gap related to school vulnerability in adolescents? The cogni-action project. International journal of environmental research and public health 18, 10073 (2021).
Stekhoven, D. J. & Bühlmann, P. MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28, 112–118 (2012).
Lumley, T., Diehr, P., Emerson, S. & Chen, L. The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annual review of public health 23, 151–169 (2002).
Gallucci, M. GAMLj: General analyses for linear models.[jamovi module]. (2019).
jamovi - Stats. Open. Now. https://www.jamovi.org/.
Park, J. Do school uniforms lead to uniform minds?: school uniforms and appearance restrictions in Korean middle schools and high schools. Fashion Theory 17, 159–177 (2013).
Gajda, A., Karwowski, M. & Beghetto, R. A. Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of educational psychology 109, 269 (2017).
Baumann, C. & Krskova, H. School discipline, school uniforms and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Management (2016).
McCarthy, N. et al. Australian primary school student’s attitudes to changing from traditional school uniforms to sports uniforms and association with student characteristics. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 43, 94–95 (2019).
Norrish, H., Farringdon, F., Bulsara, M. & Hands, B. The effect of school uniform on incidental physical activity among 10-year-old children. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education 3, 51–63 (2012).
Watson, A., Eliott, J. & Mehta, K. Perceived barriers and facilitators to participation in physical activity during the school lunch break for girls aged 12–13 years. European Physical Education Review 21, 257–271 (2015).
Bull, F. C. et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British journal of sports medicine 54, 1451–1462 (2020).
Nathan, N. et al. The impact of school uniforms on primary school student’s physical activity at school: outcomes of a cluster randomized controlled trial. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity 18, 1–9 (2021).
Eberhardt, T. et al. Secular trends in physical fitness of children and adolescents: a review of large-scale epidemiological studies published after 2006. International journal of environmental research and public health 17, 5671 (2020).
Tomkinson, G. R., Lang, J. J. & Tremblay, M. S. Temporal trends in the cardiorespiratory fitness of children and adolescents representing 19 high-income and upper middle-income countries between 1981 and 2014. British Journal of Sports Medicine 53, 478–486 (2019).
UNESCO. Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. (2020).
Nittari, G. et al. Fighting obesity in children from European World Health Organization member states. Epidemiological data, medical-social aspects, and prevention programs. Clin Ter 170, e223–e230 (2019).
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P. & Arora, A. TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. (ERIC, 2012).
Contreras, D., Elacqua, G., Martinez, M. & Miranda, Á. Bullying, identity and school performance: Evidence from Chile. International Journal of Educational Development 51, 147–162 (2016).
Valenzuela, J. P., Bellei, C. & Ríos, D. de los. Socioeconomic school segregation in a market-oriented educational system. The case of Chile. Journal of education Policy 29, 217–241 (2014).
Ansari, A., Shepard, M. & Gottfried, M. A. School uniforms and student behavior: is there a link? Early childhood research quarterly 58, 278–286 (2022).
Sabic-El-Rayess, A., Mansur, N. N., Batkhuyag, B. & Otgonlkhagva, S. School uniform policy’s adverse impact on equity and access to schooling. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education (2019).
Suárez-García, Z., Álvarez-García, D., Rodríguez, C. & De Lleida, U. Predictores de ser víctima de acoso escolar en Educación Primaria: Una revisión sistemática. Rev. Psicol. Educ. Online Adv 15, 1–15 (2020).
Álvarez-Bueno, C. et al. Academic Achievement and Physical Activity: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics 140, e20171498 (2017).
García-Hermoso, A., Hormazabal-Aguayo, I., Oriol-Granado, X., Fernández-Vergara, O. & Del Pozo Cruz, B. Bullying victimization, physical inactivity and sedentary behavior among children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 17, 114 (2020).
Hernández-Jaña, S. et al. Mediation Role of Physical Fitness and Its Components on the Association Between Distribution-Related Fat Indicators and Adolescents’ Cognitive Performance: Exploring the Influence of School Vulnerability. The Cogni-Action Project. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience 210 (2021).

Supplementarymaterial.docx

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Which one? A comparative study of traditional and sports uniforms on academic achievement, cognitive performance, playtime, bullying, and discrimination in adolescents. The Cogni-Action Project

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Figures

Introduction

Methods

Study design and ethical requirements

Participants

School uniform type

Playtime

Perception of traditional uniforms affecting physical activity

Suffered bullying and discrimination

Covariates

Statistical analysis

Results

Discussion

Differences in academic achievement and cognitive performance

Student’s perception and differences in playtime

Bullying and discrimination feelings

Influence of school vulnerability

Strength and limitations

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1