3.1 Culture Analysis
The collected water samples resulted in a total of 28 distinct pure isolates at different geographical locations in India. The methods for isolation and identification were reported previously (Rathakrishnan and Gopalan, 2022). Phylogenetic analysis of each isolate was done using PCR amplified 16S rRNA gene sequence data against a database of known species using the National Centre for Biotechnological Information (NCBI) server (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/) and found that bacteria of the genus Staphylococcus were the most common, accounting for 46.42 % of the isolates. The genus Bacillus accounted for 32 % followed by the genus Pseudomonas 7 %. There were other isolates from the genera Stenotrophomonas, Enterobacter, Ochrobactrum, and Oceanobacillus accounting for 3.5% of the total isolates. All isolates have a pairwise nucleotide sequence similarity of 96 percent to 99 percent. The bacterial isolate codes, lengths of sequences, percentage similarity to closest matched strains, and accession numbers compared were listed. To assess their phylogenetic locations, the 16S rRNA gene sequences of each strain were evaluated, and a phylogenetic tree with gene accession numbers was constructed using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 11. The readings were classified using the RDP classifier tool based on specified phylogenetic bacterial species. Firmicutes and proteobacteria were identified as prominent groupings in the phylogenetic tree (supplementary file). The genus Firmicutes was the most common among the isolated strains. The phylogenetic tree also shows that only five isolates were distinct from the rest of the isolates and their near relatives.
Table 1
Identification of halophilic isolates obtained from different solar Indian salterns
Isolate
|
Identification
|
Closest phylogenetic neighbor
|
Sequence similarity with closest phylogenetic neighbor (%)
|
Length of sequence (bp)
|
Accession No
|
AD03
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus sciuri subsp. carnaticus GTCC 1227
|
99.72
|
1100
|
MW012639
|
AD08
|
Stenotrophomonas sp.
|
Stenotrophomonas maltophila ATCC 13637
|
96.74
|
1089
|
MW012640
|
AD09
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus xylosus JCM 2418
|
99.08
|
1231
|
MW012641
|
AD11
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus arlettae ATCC 43957
|
98.87
|
1200
|
MW012642
|
AD14
|
Bacillus sp.
|
Bacillus subtilis subsp., subtilis BGSC3A28
|
97.89
|
1249
|
MW012643
|
AD15
|
Bacillus sp.
|
Bacillus piscis 16MFT21
|
97.25
|
1103
|
MW012644
|
AD23
|
Bacillus sp.
|
Bacillus tequilensis 10b
|
98.31
|
1283
|
MW012645
|
AD28
|
Bacillus sp.
|
Bacillus haynesii NRRL B-41327
|
98.63
|
1264
|
MW012646
|
AD29
|
Pseudomonas sp.
|
Pseudomonas zhaodongensis SCSIO_43767
|
98.10
|
1230
|
MW012647
|
AD35
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus sp. CTSP32
|
98.95
|
1235
|
MW012648
|
AD36
|
Staphylococucs sp.
|
Staphylococcus sciuri DSM 20345
|
97.46
|
1100
|
MW012649
|
AD37
|
Bacillus sp.
|
Bacillus paramycoides MCCC 1A04098
|
99.33
|
1190
|
MW012650
|
AD39
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus sciuri DSM 20345
|
99.27
|
1100
|
MW012651
|
AD40
|
Bacillus sp.
|
Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum BGSC3A28
|
95.22
|
1231
|
MW012652
|
AD43
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus sciuri DSM 20345
|
97.13
|
1282
|
MW012653
|
AD44
|
Bacillus sp.
|
Bacillus tequilensis 10b
|
98.43
|
1293
|
MW012654
|
AD45
|
Bacillus sp.
|
Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii NBRC 101239
|
97.15
|
1312
|
MW012655
|
AD49
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus xylosus JCM 2418
|
98.48
|
1270
|
MW012656
|
AD50
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus xylosus KL 162
|
98.19
|
1279
|
MW012657
|
AD51
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus saprophyticus ATCC 15305
|
98.48
|
1100
|
MW012658
|
AD61
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus edaphiicus CCM 8730
|
98.99
|
1100
|
MW012659
|
AD162
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus edaphicus CCM 8730
|
98.71
|
1246
|
MW012660
|
AD263a
|
Bacillus sp.
|
Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum BGSC3A2B
|
97.89
|
1288
|
MW012661
|
AD263b
|
Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staphylococcus cohnii GH 137
|
98.95
|
1314
|
MW012662
|
AD464
|
Enterobacter sp.
|
Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis 10-17
|
98.48
|
1324
|
MW012663
|
AD665
|
Pseudomonas sp.
|
Pseudomonas mendocina NC15 10541
|
98.15
|
1304
|
MW012664
|
AD770
|
Ochrabacterium sp.
|
Ochrobactrum intermedium NBRC 15820
|
98.38
|
1300
|
020173
|
AD1077
|
Oceanobacillus sp.
|
Oceanobacillus aidingensis AD7-25
|
98.28
|
873
|
020174
|
3.2 Growth optimization and pigment production of halophilic isolates
Starch Glycerol Nitrate (SGN) medium (100 ml) was prepared in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Different optimizing growth parameters, such as pH (3-11), temperature (20, 25, 30, and 35°C), and salinity, were tested separately (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 ppt) (data not shown). All of the isolates studied were salt tolerant and could grow optimally in culture conditions containing 15% sodium chloride (NaCl) (w/v). The pigmentation in culture was due to the presence of yeast extract in the medium that influenced different colorations of the culture broth. Although the isolates used in this study were from diverse habitats, their responses to salt concentration and temperature in terms of growth and pigment production were similar. At 30°C, cell growth and pigment synthesis were at their peak, and a pH of 9 was considered ideal. Bacillus haynesii, B. tequilensis, Pseudomonas zhaodongensis, Bacillus paramycoides, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus showed intense and huge pigmentation yield in 10% (w/v) NaCl concentration. Notably, B. tequilensis was able to adapt quickly, multiplying in only 18 hours. The strains showed a considerable increase in pigment biomass when the concentration of NaCl was increased from 5% to 10% (w/v), demonstrating the importance of continuous pigment synthesis in defending the cell from osmotic stress conditions. In comparison to 0 % NaCl (w/v), bacterial strains Staphylococcus cohnii, Enterobacter hormaechei, and Oceanobacillus aidingensis took longer to attain OD640 at higher salt concentrations.
3.3 Bioactive properties of extracts
Later, in the stationary phase end , a total of 28 halophilic extracts were collected from the isolates. The extracts were immiscible with ethyl acetate, hexane, isopropyl alcohol, chloroform, cyclohexane, ethanol, petroleum ether, acetone, tween-80, toluene, and butyl alcohol but miscible with DMSO and methanol. All of the isolates' methanolic extracts were kept at 4°C until needed, while the dry powder form was kept at -80°C. Biological studies used to assess the anticancer potential of these cell-free supernatants obtained from the growth medium were tested as detailed below.
3.4 Screening of extracellular anti-neoplastic enzyme-producing halophilic isolates
The ability to manufacture L-asparaginase and L-glutaminase enzymes is predominantly tested in halophilic isolates. The medium's colour changed from yellow to pink, indicating the formation of L-asparaginase and L-glutaminase. When L-asparaginase and L-glutaminase activities were tested in the cell culture, it was discovered that both enzymes were released into the culture media. There were seven isolates from Thoothukudi, five from Marakkanam, seven from Goa, four from Ernakulam, and five from Kanyakumari among the selected ones. Most of the positive strains were gram-positive cocci (46.4%). L-glutaminase showed the highest activity and was the most prevalent anti-tumor enzyme found in the tested strains, accounting for 57% of the bacterial strains (Table 2). The majority of anticancer enzyme-producing isolates stemmed from the genera Halomonas, Marinobacter, and Bacillus, which are all common in saline habitats (Ventosa.,1988) In some of the strains, the combination antitumor activity (L-asparaginase and L-glutaminase) was also identified. Both the enzyme production can be observed in the middle stationary phase. These enzymes have the potential therapeutic outcomes in anticancer behavior, therefore, allowing us to select fifteen halophilic strains for antioxidant studies. We infer from the previous study report that temperature, pH, and NaCl concentration had a significant impact on the production of both enzymes (Pejman et al.,2016). Furthermore, sucrose and glucose were the best carbon sources for Vibrio sps and Rhodococcus sps to synthesise L-asparaginase and L-glutaminase, respectively (Zolfaghar et al., 2019). According to Distasio et al.,Bacillus subtilis RSP-GLU produced the most L-glutaminase at 37.1 °C and pH 7 (Sathish and Prakasham, 2010), while Vibrio succinogenes has the most L-asparaginase activity at pH 7.3. (1976).
Table 2
Distribution of anti-neoplastic enzymes based on geographical location and cellular morphology
Sample source/cell shape
|
L-asparaginase
|
L-glutaminase
|
Goa
|
4
|
6
|
Ernakulam
|
2
|
3
|
Marakkanam
|
3
|
5
|
Thoothukudi
|
4
|
5
|
Kanyakumari
|
5
|
5
|
Gram-positive rod
|
4
|
4
|
Gram-positive cocci
|
5
|
8
|
Gram-negative rod
|
3
|
4
|
3.5 Radical Scavenging activity
3.5.1 2,2-Diphenylpicrylhydrazyl radical scavenging assay
The use of DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl), an electron transfer method to test radical scavenging capacity, revealed that all chosen halophilic bacterial extracts can suppress free radicals. The antiradical activity of the selected halophilic extracts was tested using DPPH, a stable free radical with an absorption band at 515 nm that can be greatly quenched in the presence of protonated radical scavengers (Blois, 1958). The reduction of free radicals is indicated by the darkening of the purple colour of DPPH to yellow. The DPPH experiment yielded a positive result, indicating that these compounds can serve as antioxidants by transferring electrons to reactive species like DPPH or ions with a high oxidation number. The scavenging capacity rose as the amount of extract used in the experiment increased. The as the concentration of sample at which the inhibition rate hits 50% is the Ic50 value. Antioxidant value increases as the IC50 value decreases. The IC50 of typical antioxidants (Table 3) was found to be significantly lower than that of cell extracts, indicating that the isolate AD23 (Ic50 value 5.48 mg/ml) has high free radical scavenging action than ascorbic acid and the lowest activity was observed in AD03 (Ic50 value 75.87 mg/ml).
Table 3
Results of various in vitro antioxidant analyses (mean± SD of triple assessment, n = 3)
Isolate
|
DPPH
(IC50* μg/mL)
|
FRAP (μM Fe(II)E*/mg extract)
|
ABTS(mM TE*/mg extract)
|
Nitric oxide radical scavenging activity (%) (μg/mL extract)
|
Phosphomolybdenum reduction (mg AAE*/g extract)
|
|
Standard
|
6.35c
|
27.66±0.083e
|
43.78±0.114o
|
51.61±0.011d
|
1.857±0.473a
|
|
AD03
|
75.87p
|
28.19±0.012c
|
79.41±0.014f
|
24.71±0.004i
|
0.512±.039o
|
|
AD09
|
6.00b
|
28.15±0.002b
|
84.04±0.017d
|
20.22±0.006k
|
1.318±0.017g
|
|
AD11
|
8.46i
|
46.49±0.567m
|
43.17±0.042p
|
11.83±0.027o
|
1.676±0.584d
|
|
AD14
|
10.05l
|
32.08±0.045g
|
86.34±0.007a
|
35.58±0.025g
|
1.69±0.024c
|
|
AD15
|
9.01j
|
66.14±0.020p
|
65.42±0.013k
|
40.82±0.006f
|
1.548±0.079e
|
|
AD23
|
5.48a
|
48.72±0.035o
|
72.06±0.003i
|
19.47±0.011l
|
1.038±0.019l
|
|
AD28
|
6.50d
|
35.72±0.015h
|
70.29±0.006j
|
12.73±0.004n
|
1.482±0.033f
|
|
AD29
|
13.87p
|
47.10±0.015n
|
86.19±0.012b
|
7.11±0.008p
|
1.049±0.029j
|
|
AD35
|
31.05m
|
38.67±0.037j
|
73.97±0.032h
|
64.79±0.004a
|
1.097±0.075i
|
|
AD37
|
9.72k
|
46.36±0.012l
|
53.15±0.023n
|
43.07±0.003e
|
1.053±0.115k
|
|
AD51
|
8.24h
|
38.45±0.030i
|
79.13±0.021g
|
52.43±0.002c
|
1.314±0.180h
|
|
AD162
|
7.30f
|
25.40±0.016a
|
62.79±0.081l
|
22.47±0.004j
|
0.242±0.108p
|
|
AD263
|
17.48n
|
40.20±0.042k
|
80.22±0.046e
|
28.08±0.001h
|
1.777±0.0630b
|
|
AD464
|
6.80e
|
28.89±0.030d
|
60.69±0.00m
|
15.35±0.002m
|
0.805±0.046n
|
|
AD665
|
7.46g
|
29.81±0.080f
|
86.19±0.011c
|
56.55±0.007b
|
0.878±0.116m
|
± standard deviation, % - % of Inhibition, *IC50 - sample concentration when the inhibition rate hits 50%,* Fe (II)E (ferrous ion equivalents), *TE- Trolox Equivalents, *AAE- Ascorbic Acid Equivalents. Statistically significant at p<0.05 where a>b>c>d>e>f>g>h>i>j>k>l>m>n>o>p in each column.
3.5.2 Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay
This is a colorimetric assay that evaluates plasma's ability to convert the deep blue ferric tripyridyltriazine (TPTZ) complex to its ferrous form (TPTZ-Fe (III) into TPTZ-Fe (II)), resulting in a change in absorbance. The lower value indicates that the antioxidant activity is high. When compared to ordinary ferrous sulfate, AD162 showed to have stronger ferric reducing antioxidant activity among the halophilic isolates. The ferric reducing power of the methanol extracts was 28.190.012, 28.150.002, and 25.400.016, mM Fe (II) E/mg for isolates AD03, AD09, and AD162, respectively, while isolate AD23 exhibited the least gain in ferric reducing capacity (Table 2). Standard synthetic antioxidants have much lower radical scavenging and reduction power than these species (Ferrous sulfate). Although FRAP is a simple, reliable, and cost-effective method, it is unable to detect species that function via radical quenching (H transfer), such as glutathione and proteins, which include SH group-containing antioxidants like thiols (Prior, 2000 and Huang Do, 2005).
3.5.3 ABTS (2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)
ABTS, a hydrogen atom transfer technique, was used to assess the antioxidant activity of the sample methanolic extracts at varying salt concentrations. Because it is soluble in both aqueous and organic solvents and is unaffected by ionic strength, the ABTS radical can be utilised to measure the antioxidant capacity of hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds in test samples (Roginsky and Lissi.,2005). The antioxidant changes the colorless ABTS free radical into a stable blue-colored ABTS free radical. Spectrophotometry can be used to measure the color change at 734 nm. When ABTS interacts with ferryl myoglobin, a fairly stable blue-green hue, measured at 600 nm, is formed. Color generation is inhibited to a proportional degree by antioxidants in the fluid sample (Badrinath et al.,2010). As seen, all halophilic extract’s scavenging effect increased when compared to the control except AD11(43.17±0.042 mM TE/mg extract). The highest activity was observed in AD14, AD29 and AD665 were 86.34±0.007, 86.19±0.011, 86.19±0.011 mM TE/mg extract, respectively while the standard represented 43.78±0.114 mM TE/mg extract (Table 2). The higher concentrations of phenolics and tannins, that appeared to behave as excellent radical quenchers, could explain the total antioxidant activity reported. As a result, the halophilic extract's total antioxidant capacity can be attributed to its free radical scavenging activity, which is comparable to natural and common antioxidant vitamin C. All of the analyses were carried out in three different ways.
3.5.4 Nitric oxide
Nitric oxide is a bio-supervisory molecule in the human system (immune, neurological, and cardiovascular) (Pick, 2012). Nitric oxide, or reactive nitrogen species, such as N2O4, NO2, NO3-, N3O4, and NO2+, are extremely reactive when they combine with oxygen or superoxide. Many cellular components have their structure and functional behavior altered by these substances. The nitric oxide radical scavenging activity was calculated as a (%) value and the values are represented in standard deviation. The methanolic extract of AD35 showed maximum scavenging of 64.79±0.004 μg/mL whereas the standard rutin at the same concentration exhibited 51.61±0.011 μg/mL (Table 2). The scavenging activity also may aid to stop the cascade of reactions that are harmful to human health and are triggered by excess NO production. Cancer, inflammation, and other pathological disorders have all been linked to nitric acid (Moncada., 1991). Halophilic extracts can be utilized to scavenge reactive nitrogen species in the human body because they demonstrate good performance.
3.5.5 Phosphomolybdenum assay
The phosphomolybdenum approach works by converting Mo (VI) to Mo (V) and generating a green phosphate/Mo (V) complex with an absorption maxima at 695 nm, where an elevated absorbance indicates a higher overall scavenging capacity (Prieto et al., 1999). This approach was utilized to assess the antioxidant capabilities of methanolic extracts of halophilic isolates spectrophotometrically, with rutin as a positive reference molecule. When compared to all other solvent extracts, rutin had significantly the highest activity (1.857±0.473 mg AAE/g extract), although methanolic extracts had higher activities (1.676±0.584 and 1.69±0.024 mg AAE/g extract by AD14 and AD11 halophilic isolates, respectively) (Table 2). The lowest activity is exhibited in AD162 (0.242±0.108 mg AAE/g extract). The increased activity of the crude extracts could be attributable to the inclusion of additional chemicals, and the extraction solvents have also been reported to have remarkable outcomes in terms of Mo reduction (VI).
3.6 UV-Visible Spectroscopy
The methanol extract’s UV–vis spectra are similar to conventional carotenoids spectra. The broad-band centered at 400–500 nm is the most prominent feature of these spectra (Figure 1). These are carotenoids in the bacterioruberin class, such as zeaxanthin, beta-carotene, lutein, canthaxanthin, and lycopene, that have antioxidant properties and provide organisms yellow, orange, pink, and red hues. The antioxidant activity of carotenoids is assumed to have a role in many disease prevention, and certain of them, such as lycopene and beta-carotene, are widely known for their antioxidant properties (Squillaci et al.,2017). Although the carotenoids from Haloterrigena turkmenica have substantial antioxidant properties, their output is insufficient for widespread application. In the perspective of this, the carotenoid pigments of psychrotolerant Sphingobacterium antarcticus and mesophilic Sphingobacterium multivorum were characterized, and different characteristics such as their in vivo location, production, and in vitro interactions with membranes were investigated by Jagannatham et al., (2000). Carotenoids also have biological roles and activities in humans and animals, such as light absorbers, anticancer, scavengers of active oxygen, oxygen transporters, and promoters of in vitro antibody formation (Kaulmann and Bohn, 2014; Gupta and Prakash, 2014; Ascenso et al., 2014).
3.7 Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS) analysis
Among other probable sources, antioxidant metabolites extracted from halophilic bacteria have received the greatest interest in recent years. LC-MS/MS was used to separate and mass characterize the halophilic extract in methanol. The existence of unlike components in the pigment, which may be carotenoids, was identified via LC-MS/MS analysis. In positive ionisation mode, ions correspond to protonated molecules [M + H]+, while in negative ionisation mode, ions correspond to deprotonated molecules [M-H]-. The list of carotenoids has been identified using reference standards. LCMS/MS analysis identified twenty components, where all exhibit biological activity. The chromatogram of LC-MS/MS analysis of the above four isolates is depicted (Figure 2) that illustrates retention time, mass to charge ratio along percentage intensity. The molecular formula, structure, and biological activity of identified carotenoids are tabulated (supplementary file). β-Carotene, a carotenoid synthesis intermediate, was discovered to be generated from lycopene (Chi et al., 2015; Rodriguez-Saiz et al., 2010;). Furthermore, the production of 3-hydroxy cyclic carotenoids and epoxy carotenoids is known to be caused by hydroxylation of hydrocarbon carotenoids (Ambati et al., 2010). In the pharmaceutical sector, LC-MS/MS is a particularly useful approach for quickly screening medication contaminants and degradation products.
3.8 Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy Analysis
Several key organic volatile substances and their derivatives were discovered as a result of this investigation. The goal of this study was to use GC-MS to identify an antioxidant molecule from an organic solvent extract of four halophilic isolates. Because the isolates coded AD11, AD14, AD23 and AD28 varied from other isolates in terms of tested biochemical activity, it was chosen for completion of this study. Based on the match factor (comparison of unknown’s spectra against library’s known spectra), the main constituent of halophilic crude extract, containing unique chemical compounds in the first five numbers having 60-70% match is presented. Table 4 shows the compound name, retention time (RT), molecular formula, and structure reported in the crude extract. Some of our chemical components have been determined to have medicinal importance in pharmaceutical domains when their mass spectrum were compared to those in the NIST 20 library database (supplementary file). The GC-MS analysis characterized many organic compounds that had pharmaceutical applications like anti-oxidant, anticancer, neuroprotective, etc. The peak at the retention time of 9.54 and 9.48 was confirmed as thiazolo and thiophene with the molecular formula of C14H8N4S2 and C38H12S reported to have antioxidant properties. These secondary metabolites provide a new research route for identifying chemical elements with anticancer activity in the future. Microalgae produce active extracts with antioxidant and antibacterial properties, according to Krishnakumar et al (2013). In terms of retention time and peak area percentage, a few other minor chemical compounds were also detected. Based on the findings, methanol was chosen as the best organic solvent for extracting bioactive substances from halophilic bacteria for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications.