3.1. Effect of ultrasonication on total protein extraction yield and solubility
The expression of specific energy released as a result of consumption of heat energy (produced from the conversion of dissipated power) by the sample matrix is correlated with factors such as medium viscosity, the mass of the sample, power input, exposure time, and temperature (Gonzalez-Centeno et al., 2014 and Strieder et al., 2019). The increased power and exposure duration of ultrasonic mediation promoted the maximum penetration of specific energy in 21.11–85.36 J mL− 1 range (Table S1). Figure 1A shows that a significant improvement in protein extraction after 5 min of ultrasonic treatment was feasible relative to the alkaline extracted samples, noted for each power input on this occasion. As expected, although the extraction yield was significantly increased from 5.76 to 83.61% with increasing power from 150 to 400 W, the trend of protein release was not linear along the processing time. At power level ranging between 250-350W, 20 min of sonication was adequate with no advantage to execute UAE beyond as the peak yield had been attained. As amplitude increases, ultrasonic shear waves distort and infiltrate the targeted cell walls constructively, leading to an improved mass movement ratio and facilitating the liberation of intracellular products into a solvent (Preece et al., 2017). In contrast, due to over-suspended impurities, extended sonication time might restrict solvent penetration into the cell walls. Nevertheless, when the sonication power extends to a higher time point beyond 20 min at 400 W, the yield declines considerably, probably due to the over-production of cavitation bubbles hindering the distribution of ultrasound waves. Following 20 min of treatment at 400 W, the highest protein yield was 36% greater than the yield obtained without sonication. Furthermore, protein solubility was found to increase gradually from 150 to 300 W along with time. However, after 15 min at 350 W and after 105 min at 400 W, the solubility seemed to decrease successively (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1B).
For our subsequent studies, further analysis was carried out only with those samples having protein yield above 50%, produced upon UAE at 59.62 J mL− 1 (sample A), 64.13 J mL− 1 (sample B), 67.48 J mL− 1 (sample C), 63.23 J mL− 1 (sample D), 71.45 J mL− 1 (sample E) and 76.39 J mL− 1 (sample F).
3.2. Effect of ultrasonication on the particle size distribution
The particles in the solution before sonication (t = 0) were in a highly aggregated and insoluble state, perhaps ascribed to the presence of fibers and chitin (found in Eri pupae as seen before in Longwah et al., 2011 study) within the aggregated structure. According to Fig. 2, the untreated sample primarily represented a trimodal dispersal of molecules in the entire size range between 0.5–2430 µm. The peak in the scale of 0.5–2.3 µm and 2.5–35 µm might be due to some soluble and insoluble protein molecules distributed in the steady phase of the sample, respectively. In contrast, the larger-sized particles (> 35 µm) were supposed to be related to the existence of intact cells, fibers, and chitin. A significant stepwise shift of the 2.5–35 µm peak to a smaller range of 0.1–1.2 µm was observed upon the rise in specific energy consumption from 59.6 to 64.1J mL− 1, which could be due to the reduction of insoluble protein particles into various size polymers or monomers which leads to improved solubilization. Particles within this diameter can be detected in the supernatant fraction after centrifugation. Such decrease in protein size in agglomerates must be credited to disturbances in intermolecular interactions, which generally support globular protein clusters in suspension, promoted by intense hydrodynamic micro-jets generated during acoustic cavitations. Deductions in protein sizes induced by ultrasound were widely documented for different systems (Jambrak et al., 2014; Preece et al., 2017). In contrast, the peak intensity of 0.1–1.2 µm size range in sample C showed a minor shift, but these particle volumes were significantly reduced, followed by an increase in the formation of a peak at 2.5–37 µm as well as volume in this case. While particles size distribution range extended to 3.9–95 µm and 95-2430 µm in sample E. Upon uptake of 76.4 J mL− 1 specific energy, particles aggregated extensively with broadening of distribution (bimodal pattern) peak, creating bigger particles of 2.0- 1090 µm sizes with the most significant fraction of >1 µm volume was 48.83%. Compared to the sample at t = 0, d [4,3] of <1 µm particles in ultrasound-treated samples shifted from 0.15 µm to 0.20–0.25 µm (Table S2).
3.3. Effect of ultrasonication on thermal characteristics
The gradual shifting of Eri pupae-derived proteins from their innate confirmation to a denatured position upon high-intensity UAE parameters can be recorded as varied endothermic changes (Table 1). Significant variations were noticed in the denaturation temperatures between alkaline extracted and ultrasound-assisted alkaline extracted EPPI. Compared to conventionally extracted proteins, those extracted upon consumption of specific energy 59.6 J mL− 1 showed no significant difference in denaturation temperature (Td). In contrast, samples B and C presented lowerTd values comparatively. Wherein, the enthalpy of denaturation (∆H) values consecutively reduced from 48.7 to 31.2 J g− 1 protein (P < 0.05) for the protein isolates A-C, respectively, compared to control, suggesting some conformational transformation in these pupae proteins possibly due to the disruption or realignment of inter/intramolecular forces induced by strong cavitational waves at respective ultrasonic treatment. Sample D showed Td and ∆H values having no significant difference with A and B, respectively. Due to minimal thermal stability, the lowest Td and ∆H of 73.1°C and 31.2 J g− 1 were observed for sample C. However, higher energy consumption values at 71.4 and 76.4 J mL− 1 caused an appreciable increase in the Td and ∆H values compared to those with the lowest values. Such enhancement might be attributed to the rearrangement of hydrophobic and disulfide bonds between unsettled protein conformations at secondary and tertiary levels (Chandrapala et al., 2012).
Table 1
Thermal characteristics of Eri pupae proteins extracted with and without ultrasonic energy.
| Thermal characteristics |
Samples | To (° C) | Td (° C) | Te(° C) | ΔH (J/g) |
Control | 54.0 ± 0.2a | 94.2 ± 1.4a | 97.7 ± 0.5e | 48.7 ± 1.5a |
A | 51.3 ± 1.2b | 90.5 ± 1.3ab | 112.4 ± 0.6d | 45.2 ± 1.6b |
B | 47.5 ± 1.3c | 85.6 ± 1.2c | 122.3 ± 1.7c | 40.5 ± 1.3c |
C | 46.1 ± 1.4c | 73.1 ± 1.4e | 128.2 ± 1.4b | 31.2 ± 0.5e |
D | 46.3 ± 0.8c | 88.7 ± 1.3b | 128.3 ± 0.8b | 41.2 ± 1.5c |
E | 42.1 ± 0.6d | 78.5 ± 1.3d | 133.5 ± 1.5a | 35.3 ± 0.8d |
F | 37.7 ± 1.3e | 79.6 ± 1.3d | 135.5 ± 1.2a | 36.2 ± 0.7d |
Results are expressed as mean values ± standard deviations of n = 3. Different superscript letters in the same column represent statistical difference (p ≤ 0.05). To: onset temperature, Td: denaturation temperature, Te: endset temperature, ΔH: enthalpy of denaturation. |
3.4. Effect of ultrasonication on secondary structural characteristics as determined by FTIR spectroscopy
The stability of proteins released during sonication is essential to have a complete picture of how the proteins behave under ultrasound conditions concerning their conformational and physicochemical changes. Therefore, in this study, the extracted protein’s conformational characteristics were detected in the amide I spectral location between 1700 and 1600 cm− 1, representing the C = O expanding resonance of the peptide bonds. The collected spectrum of extracted pupae protein samples distinctly demonstrated the result of ultrasonic energy in differential peak intensities followed by a secondary structure pattern noted for α-helix (1651-53 cm− 1), intermolecular and intramolecular β-sheets (1620 and 1632 cm− 1), aggregated β-sheets (1700 − 1694 cm− 1), β-turns (1667-84 cm− 1), 310-helices (1661-64 cm− 1), and random unordered structures (1644-48 cm− 1) (Grewal et al., 2017).
The obtained spectra were derivatized (mentioned in section 2.6.) to distinctly isolate the overlapping bands so that subsequent alterations due to individual treatments could be anticipated (Fig. 3A and B), which were not deducible with the native protein spectra.
Table 2 summarizes the overall percentage areas of various secondary conformations belonging to the amide I region in pupae proteins as a function of specific treatment integration. Table 3 compiled the band intensity (percentage) of particular constituents of β-sheet and β-turn conformations. As represented in both Tables (2 and 3), the peak intensity for α-helix was slightly reduced (p < 0.05) for sample B, and there was a considerable reduction in β-sheet component at 1619 and 1630 cm− 1 followed by considerable elevation in β-sheet peak intensity at 1640 and 1634 cm− 1. While no such significant variation for α-helix intensity was observed for samples A and D, the β-sheet intensity peak at 1628 and 1640 cm− 1 increased remarkably. Instead of rearrangement patterns in different β-sheet components, no significant alteration in the overall β-sheet peak area was noted for samples A, B, and D compared to control.
Table 2
Total percentage areas of secondary conformations in amide I region of FTIR spectra.
Conformational element | Wavenumber (cm− 1) | Area (%) | SEa |
Control | A | B | C | D | E | F | |
α-helix | 1651-53 | 13.6e | 13.2e | 10.5d | 9.3c | 13.4e | 1.3a | 6.3b | 0.4 |
Total β-sheet | 1619-42, 1688-97 | 48.4a | 50.3a | 48.0a | 52.5b | 49.8a | 58.2c | 57.1c | 1.3 |
Total β-turn | 1667-84 | 16.4a | 17.2a | 16.3a | 16.0a | 15.8a | 16.5a | 26.7b | 0.4 |
Large loops | 1656-58 | 3.5b | 3.4b | 3.1b | 3.1b | 3.3b | 2.1a | 4.1b | 0.4 |
Random | 1644-48 | 2.7a | 2.3a | 2.8a | 2.8a | 2.6a | 4.6b | 4.6b | 0.4 |
310-helices | 1661-64 | 7.3b | 6.7b | 7.4b | 9.4c | 6.6b | 3.8a | 5.9b | 0.7 |
Means in the same row that do not share the same letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05). |
a Standard error for all summed up data for a particular secondary structure. |
Table 3
Percentage areas of β-sheet and β-turn obtained from amide Iregion in FTIR spectra.
Band assignment | Control | A | B | C | D | E | F | SEa |
Band frequency (cm− 1) | Area (%) | Band frequency (cm− 1) | Area (%) | Band frequency (cm− 1) | Area (%) | Band frequency (cm− 1) | Area (%) | Band frequency (cm− 1) | Area (%) | Band frequency (cm− 1) | Area (%) | Band frequency (cm− 1) | Area (%) |
β-sheet | 1619 | 3.0b | 1619-20 | 3.2b | 1619 | 2.2a | 1620 | 5.8c | 1619 | 3.0b | 1620 | 7.7d | 1620 | 10.2e | 1.5 |
β-sheet | 1624 | 7.1c | 1623-25 | 6.6c | 1623 | 7.3c | 1623-24 | 3.3a | 1624 | 6.8c | 1624 | 4.1b | 1624 | 7.2c | 0.8 |
β-sheet | 1629-30 | 11.4c | 1628 | 13.3d | 1630 | 8.7a | 1630 | 10.8b | 1628 | 12.9d | 1630 | 15.7e | 1630 | 10.9b | 3.0 |
β-sheet | 1632-34 | 9.5b | 1633-34 | 8.8b | 1634 | 11.4c | 1633 | 13.8d | 1633 | 9.1b | 1632 | 11.3c | 1632 | 4.6a | 5.0 |
β-sheet | 1640 | 10.0b | 1640 | 12.5c | 1640 | 11.6c | 1639 | 10.6b | 1640 | 13.0d | 1640 | 8.8a | 1640 | 10.8b | 2.7 |
β-sheet | 1689 | 5.2a | 1688-89 | 4.4a | 1688 | 5.2a | 1690 | 5.5a | 1688 | 4.6a | 1689 | 5.4a | 1688 | 4.7a | 2.8 |
β-sheet | 1700 − 1694 | 2.4a | 1693-94 | 1.8a | 1692-93 | 2.1a | 1695 | 2.7a | 1692 | 2.0a | 1694,1698 | 5.2b | 1694 | 8.7c | 0.7 |
β-turn | 1669 | 4.8a | 1668 | 4.5a | 1668 | 4.7a | 1669 | 4.4a | 1669 | 5.0a | 1667-69 | 6.3b | 1669 | 5.3a | 0.4 |
β-turn | 1674 | 3.0a | 1674 | 3.3a | 1672-73 | 2.8a | 1674 | 2.4a | 1673 | 3.2a | 1674 | 2.9a | 1673-74 | 7.8b | 0.3 |
β-turn | 1679 | 6.5b | 1678-79 | 6.2b | 1678-79 | 6.2b | 1678 | 7.2b | 1678 | 6.4b | 1679 | 3.7a | 1678-79 | 11.1c | 0.7 |
β-turn | 1683 | 2.1a | 1682-83 | 1.8a | 1682 | 2.3a | 1683 | 1.6a | 1683 | 2.0a | 1683 | 3.6b | 1683 | 2.5a | 0.4 |
Means in the same row that do not share the same letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05). |
a Standard error for all summed up data for a particular secondary structure. |
Moreover, other secondary conformations did not seem to be significantly influenced by the sonication process for samples A, B, and D. In contrast with the control sample, samples C, E, and F exhibited maximum structural changes with an increase in varied disorganized structure induced by ultrasound extraction. Thus, when sonication power increased from 300 to 400 W and increasing time, the α-helix peak intensity declined to 9.3% at the ultrasonic energy value of 67.5 J mL− 1. This peak nearly diminished at 71.4 J mL− 1; however, it reappeared at 76.4 J mL− 1 (Table 2). For sample C (at 76°C), total β-sheet (Table 1) rise by 4.1%, with a significant decline in the intensity of the band allotted to β-sheets at 1623-24 cm− 1 accompanied by a significant enhancement in β-sheet component at 1620 and 1633 cm− 1 and 310 helices (1663 cm− 1) (Table 3).
The spectra obtained for samples E and F indicated that these conditions influenced the secondary conformation of proteins broadly in contrast with other samples. Intense variations were observed for sample E (at 83°C) with enhancement in the intensity of β-sheet constituent (particularly at 1630 cm− 1, 1694 cm− 1 and 1698 cm− 1) and intermolecular β-sheets (1620 cm− 1) at the cost of β-sheet constituent (1624 cm− 1) (P < 0.05). PCA analysis further confirmed these data by separating samples according to sonication treatment along PC1 and PC2, elucidating 92 and 5% of deviation, respectively (Fig. 4A and B). PCA separated control from selected ultrasound extracted samples followed by grouping into samples A, B, and D; sample C; samples E, and F, inferring considerable alterations in the protein secondary conformation in each group. Sample E was distinguished from the remaining samples towards PC1 with maximum loading for 1620–1640 cm− 1 implying considerable structural reorganization of β-sheets at the evaluated temperature, accompanied by decreased (P < 0.05) loops (1657 cm− 1; 2.1%) and 310-helix (1661–1663 cm− 1,3.8%) along with the slightly increased formation of turns (at 1667–1669 cm− 1; 6.3%and 1683 cm− 1; 3.6%), reduced β-turn at 1679 cm− 1 (with no significant change in total β-turn intensity %) and increased random structures (at 1645–1647 cm− 1, 4.6%) (Tables 2 and 3), suggesting various proportions of sub-agglomerates development due to protein denaturation. Compared to control, prolonged treatment at 76.39 J mL− 1 (97°C) exhibited β-sheet element at 1632 cm− 1 correlated to intramolecular sheet components to reduce from 9.5–4.6% as well as a β-sheet element at 1620 and 1694 cm− 1 correlated to intermolecular sheet components and its aggregates to increase by 7.2% and 6.3% (Table 3), respectively, accompanied by significant improvement in β-turns (peak 1673–1674 cm− 1, 1678–1679 cm− 1) by 10.3% and random conformation (1646–1648 cm− 1) by 2%. The loading plot further confirmed the observations, which indicated that sample F was isolated through PC2 with reduced loading in the zone 1629–1640 cm− 1 and profound loading in peak region 1694–1700 cm− 1 assigned to aggregates. It also presented a maximum loading for α-helix, substantiating the previous finding of recurrence of this conformation. Thus, the temperature factor was more evident when it inclined above 75°C, causing major shifts in the 1620–1642 cm− 1range, particularly with a deviation of intermolecular β- sheets.
3.5. Effect of ultrasonication on structural characteristics as determined by Raman spectroscopy
UAE caused appreciable alterations in Raman spectra (400–3000 cm− 1) of proteins framework (Fig. 5), specific assignments, and percentage area of individual bands in amide I and III regions after curve-fitting analysis (Fig. 6) are outlined in Table 4. Compared to control, which had the highest α-helix content of 82.3%, enhancement in ultrasonic energy produced upon extension in sonication power and treatment duration instigated a drift towards helix uncoiling, which was established by the reduction of peak intensity centered at 1322 and 1647 cm− 1 (contributing to α-helix) accompanied by increased intensity of peak at 1243 cm− 1 and 1668–1675 cm− 1 allotted to β-sheet. Especially when the ultrasonic energy was between 63.2 J mL− 1 and 71.4 J mL− 1, the evident band intensity near 1668–1675 cm − 1 became significantly dominant in sample E, indicating the gradual formation of sheets. However, this elevation in β-sheet absorbance was not somehow detected in the Raman spectrum obtained from sample C (in contrast to what we have found in FTIR spectra), probably because particles present might jumble and developed protein matrix rapidly, resulting in a rapid change to measure. However, minor variations existed within UAE samples. For example, it was noticed that the absorption peak at 1647 cm− 1 was significantly broadened by 6% in sample F, highlighting the remodeling of the protein’s secondary constitution. In addition, two peaks appeared at 1664 and 1670 cm− 1 (depicting random coil) in sample E, which successively became broader in sample F. Such observation is consistent with FTIR data which is sufficient enough to explain the transition of Raman bands analysis as sonication proceeded.
Table 4
Total percentage areas of Raman peaks.
Conformational element | Band frequency (cm− 1) | Area (%) | SEa |
Control | A | B | C | D | E | F | |
α-helix | 1322 | 36.0e | 33.4d | 34.2d | 31.4c | 33.8d | 24.3b | 16.2a | 1.4 |
α-helix | 1647 | 46.3c | 44.4c | 45.8c | 40.5b | 45.2c | 32.5a | 52.4d | 1.0 |
β-sheet | 1243 | 7.3a | 7.1a | 6.7a | 6.8a | 7.0a | 12.5b | 14.5c | 0.6 |
β-sheet | 1668-75 | 5.4a | 6.2a | 4.9a | 4.1a | 5.2a | 9.7b | 12.1c | 0.7 |
Random coil | 1664 | 0.5b | 0.4b | 0.6b | 0.3a | 0.6b | 3.7c | 6.3d | 1.2 |
Random coil | 1670 | 0.7a | 0.8a | 0.6a | 0.8a | 0.7a | 3.4b | 5.7c | 1.1 |
C-H stretching vibrations | 2929 | 10.5a | 24.8e | 26.6f | 31.4g | 18.4d | 12.8b | 20.2c | 0.4 |
C-H stretching vibrations | 1448-50 | 8.2a | 9.1a | 8.5a | 18.5d | 7.4a | 12.3b | 15.6c | |
CH2, CH3 stretching vibrations | 1440-65 | 7.3a | 8.5a | 7.9a | 27.5d | 8.1a | 16.3b | 19.2c | 0.7 |
Tryptophan | 760 | 5.7a | 4.2a | 5.1a | 14.7c | 6.2a | 16.1c | 10.8b | 0.5 |
Tyrosine | I850/830 | 0.6a | 1.3c | 2.1d | 3.2e | 2.5d | 3.2e | 0.8b | 0.7 |
Means in the same row that do not share the same letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05). |
a Standard error for all summed up data for a particular secondary structure. |
To identify the pattern of disulfide bonds, the wavelength region within 500–550 cm− 1 assigned to the S-S bridge was evaluated because it was noticed that peak intensity between 2570–2575 cm− 1 assigned to –SH stretching vibration was eventually decreased, illustrating transformation into S-S bond (Fig. 5). However, an observed shift and changes in Raman peaks and bands intensities, respectively, which suggests alterations in S-S bridge conformation and content (Fig. 7i) have also occurred. Based on Fig. 7 presenting the outcome of deconvoluted spectra (Fig. 7(ii-viii)) of S-S bonds illustrating for control and sample A-F, it was noticed that for samples B and D, the relative content of S-S(t−g−g) (522 cm− 1) depicting trans-gauche-gauche conformation was significantly reduced due to breakage of S-S bond (Fig. 7ix). In contrast, no considerable variation existed for the remaining band’s intensity. This result contrasts with the sample without sonication, where the corresponding intensity of 510 and 522 cm− 1 peaks were considerably high, and the peak at 545 cm− 1 was comparably low. For sample C, the relative intensity of S-S(g−g−g) at 510 cm− 1 depicting gauche-gauche-gauche conformation shifted to 515 cm− 1 and gradually reduced; the relative intensity of S-S(t−g−g) conformation steadily increased to 34% and shifted from 520 to 527 cm− 1, no significant change was noted for S-S(t−g−t) (545 cm− 1) content depicting trans-gauche-trans conformation (Fig. 7ix). It indicates gradual unfolding of the α-helix and rearrangement into other conformations, which caused alteration of C-C and C-S bond brought by S-S stretching vibration with a considerable rise in temperature as reported by Wu et al. (2019). As ultrasonic energy continues to rise above 70J mL− 1, the content of S-S(t−g−t) was increased to 49.3 ± 2.2% (sample E) and 59.1 ± 1.6% (sample F) with consecutive blue shift and reduction in S-S(g−g−g) as well as S-S(t−g−g) content as compared to the one obtained without treatment (Fig. 7 ix), leading to new unstable intermolecular S-S bond formation (Xiong et al., 2020). Therefore, this could contribute to the rapid aggregation of subunits.
Raman spectroscopy was more sensitive to polar, non-polar, and aliphatic stretching vibrations, whereas these bands were difficult to detect and isolate in FTIR spectroscopy (Sun et al., 2011). Therefore, according to Kobayashi et al. (2017), Raman spectra could be utilized to estimate protein’s hydrophobic core surroundings and, thus, an essential feature adding to the texture, tenderness, and shear force of the sample. The Raman peak spotted near 2929 cm− 1 is generally credited to the C-H elasticity. The elevated intensity of this peak is brought by an exhibition of protein’s hydrophobic aliphatic amino acid side chains. In our study, the peak intensity at 2929 cm− 1 successively decreased from sample C > B > A > D > F > E (Table 4). The lowest intensity of this band in sample E is because ultrasound-induced denaturation of pupae proteins (as seen in their secondary structural FTIR data) might have aided the proteins to aggregates, resulting in less exposure. However, an extension of ultrasonic energy input possibly caused these aggregates to get slightly loosened due to increased heating since denaturation followed by helix refolding was observed in the above section, thus resulting in slightly higher band intensity in sample F. In contrast to these results, no significant difference in the intensity of the peak at 1448-50 cm− 1 was observed among sample A, B, and D compared to alkaline extracted protein. Sun et al. (2011) reported that Raman bands closer to 1440–1465 cm− 1 were contributed by CH2, CH3 bending vibrations. Similarly, in agreement with what we have seen for peaks at 2929 cm− 1, this band intensity pattern was also highest in sonicated sample C due to maximum aliphatic side chain exposure causing increased hydrophobic interactions between the residues and then significantly declining upon extraction at 400 W between 15 to 20 min, indicating the cross-linking possibly due to formation of gelation in sample E and F (Table 4). This data is consistent with the tryptophan absorption peak at 760 cm− 1 (Table 4) which explains the polarity of the microenvironment nearby hydrogen bonds. While in the present study, as expected with gradual increase of temperature as an outcome of increased ultrasonic energy, I850/830 also consecutively increased to ≥ 1.3 (for samples A, B, and D), suggesting exposure of tyrosine residues on the protein surface (Table 4). Particularly, with the rise in temperature above 70°C due to input of ultrasonic energy more than ~ 65 J mL− 1, the I850/830 can reach nearly 3.2 (samples C and E), indicating intense hydrogen bond receiving behavior of tyrosine residues as a result of exposure in the polar microenvironment. However, sample F showed a lower value of I850/830 (0.8) because of the involvement of tyrosine residues to interact intermolecularly in their refolded and buried position (Zhang et al., 2015). Also, the peaks at 2014, 2168, and 2420 cm− 1 gradually disappeared with an increase in ultrasonic energy input, which probably depicts the development of firm 3-D network-like structures (Fig. 5). It suggested that different shear constraints developed due to variation in cavitation environment could temper or modify the shape of Eri pupae protein released in the solvent in different ways.
3.5. Effect of ultrasonication on structural characteristics as determined by intrinsic fluorescence
The primary fundamental fluorescence emissions from tryptophan residues additionally impart a sensitive mode of identifying protein conformations by providing details regarding the regional environment of tryptophan which comprises nearby amino acids and background hydrophobicity (Christensen et al., 2006). Figure 8A shows an overlaid plot of the averaged and area normalized emission spectra for tryptophan (Ftrp) in samples A-F. The Trp residues present in the control sample exhibited two emission spectra at 341.7 and 355 nm on account of the two adjacent isoenergetic transition positions. For samples A and B, the emission spectra' essence and intensity remain unimpaired (p > 0.05) perhaps due to more negligible structural alteration. In contrast, sample C showed increased emission intensity by 6.8%, which peaks at around 345 nm denoting protein structural reorganization leading to some denatured pupae protein assemblies with a group of Trp residues bonded; possibly due to the physiochemical medium generated during the given sonication condition. Sample C also displayed a significant red shift to 365 nm besides improving emission strength. Such distinguished spectrum shifts specify exposure of Trp residues located in the released pupae proteins to the solvent during sonication due to conformational changes in protein unfolding, aggregation, and oligomerization (Lakowicz, 2006). Sample D also exhibited a slight elevation in emission peak compared to control, but the change was appeared to be non-significant. On the other hand, Trp fluorescence intensity peak in samples E and F decreased by 6.5 and 8.5% with increased sonication power and treatment time. Due to the rise in shear waves and resulting thermal activities during sonication, Trp emission got highly quenched due to the bonding of Trp components with nearby amino acid moieties suggesting a conformational reorganization of the protein entities (as seen in FTIR data). Moreover, the emission intensity values suggested that the quenching is relatively more substantial in sample F compared to E, which perhaps indicates that the extent of structural modification is higher in sample F compared to E, which could be because of a further increase in cavitation intensity accompanied by an increase in a temperature to 95°C. In addition, the structured emission spectra for sample F disappeared. In contrast, they persisted to a specific extent for sample E, highlighting that the Trp moieties in sample F encounter a homogeneous molecular domain. The surroundings of the Trp residues possibly got slightly more hydrophobic in this case since, compared to sample C, there was less and no clear red shift observed in the emission maxima for samples E and F, respectively, suggesting that the Trp moieties in the protein complexes were not exposed the way sample C did. Such difference in hydration ability promotes Trp moieties of proteins present in sample C to remain in its more humid phase than the Trp moieties of proteins in samples E and F with a less hydrated core. Such variation in the position and content of denatured protein corresponded to the heterogeneous and aggregated behavior (obtained in confocal microscopy; Fig. 9) in samples E and F compared to the homogeneous microstructure of the control sample. Hence, the Trp moieties encounter a vital domain in the entire sonication process.
In addition, since dityrosine is a molecular marker of protein oxidation, the formation of the dityrosine bonds might provide knowledge regarding protein complexes and their globular structure (Scheidegger et al., 2013). Therefore, during sonication, the cavitational stress and temperature elevation would promote the likelihood and energy for tyrosine residues to unmask and connect, which will aid in the increase in Fdt intensity, found to be highest in sample E, followed by samples C and F (Fig. 8B). The metal ion’s existence, matrix complexity, and protein structure are the principal factors determining the coverage of dityrosine appearance in proteins (Liu et al., 2018; Scheidegger et al., 2013).
Overall, these results explained variation in particle size and thermal analysis data observed within the samples and agree with the study done by Li and Xiong (2021). They previously described the thermal effect produced during the sonication process in developing protein-protein clusters.
3.3. The proteome of Eripupae
To further understand the nature of individual proteins in Eri pupae, we performed proteomic analysis of the proteins extracted in sample D (with high protein yield and minimal structural distortion) in our subsequent study.
SDS-PAGE evaluation of supernatant and pellet fragments procured from ultrasound (63.23 J mL− 1) assisted complete protein yield from Eri pupae inferred the existence of diverse proteins (Fig. 10A and 10B). Under the reduced state, supernatant revealed that the molecular weight (mol. wt) of proteins ranged from ~ 10 to 245 kDa, though proteins within ~ 16 to 33 kDa range were typical (28.7%) (Lane1, Fig. 10A). Notably, in supernatant fraction, the molecular masses pattern of Eri pupae proteins seemed slightly inconsistent under non-reduced and reduced conditions (Lane 1, Fig. 10B). This differentiation possibly highlights several perspectives, comprising multimeric noncovalent oligomers, protein-protein assembly, or collective subunits that might play an efficient role in silkworm pupae metabolic management. Likewise, investigation of pellets presented in reduced (Lane 2, Fig. 10A) and non-reduced (Lane 2, Fig. 10B) state demonstrates the presence of molecules with molecular masses ranging from ~ 15 to 33 kDa. Meanwhile, it was observed that ~ 15 − 19 kDa weight proteins were prevalent (16.2%) in pellet parts in both states based on a densitometry survey. Moreover, the intensity percentage of bands present in gel sections 1 (Mol wt > 45 kDa), 2 (Mol wt 20–45 kDa), 3 (Mol wt 16–20 kDa), and 4 (Mol wt 10–15 kDa) in the supernatant and also for gel sections 1 (Mol wt > 23 kDa) and 2 (Mol wt 10–23 kDa) corresponding to pellet fraction were convincingly consistent with the relative availability of Eri pupae proteins, inferred by LC-MS/MS examination (Fig. 10C and Fig. 11).
The abundance of proteins presents in supernatant and pellet as deduced by mass spectrometry evaluation agreed with the corresponding ions in Eri pupae (Table S3). The matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry evaluation of supernatant and pellet fractions suggested the existence of overall 80 and 38 discrete ions within m/z scale of 5.4 to 247 kDa and 5.5 to 50 kDa, respectively (Table S3). Although unavailability of a substantial corresponding database makes this procedure of quantifying pupae protein limits our study. At the same time, the present study's data agrees with the corresponding band intensities depicting diverse Eri pupae proteins.
MS/MS-attained peptide’s amino acid order aligned with the matched databank proteins is presented in Fig. S1. 107 distinct proteins in Eri pupae assigned to 26 insect protein families were deduced via MS/MS investigation of trypsin cleaved total 4 and 2 gel segments of pellet and supernatant (Table S4, Table S5). Eighty-two enzymatic and non-enzymatic molecules assigned to 22 discrete insecta protein families (see Table S4) were established in the supernatant fraction. In contrast, 25 enzymatic and non-enzymatic molecules assigned to 8 discrete insecta protein families were spotted (see Table S4) in the pellet. The comparative availability of diverse groups of proteins presents in Eri pupae as established by the proteomic investigation is shown in Fig. 11 in detail. Thus, it was demonstrated that the Eri pupae proteome was prevailed by a non-enzymatic section of proteins that accounted for 60% of the proteome closely.