Gamma-ray spectrometry was used to measure the radioactivity levels of NORMs in 29 different medicinal plants that are commonly used in Egypt. The equation used to figure out the average concentrations of \({}_{.}{}^{226}\text{R}\text{a}, {}_{.}{}^{232}\text{T}\text{h}, \text{a}\text{n}\text{d} {}_{.}{}^{40}\text{K}\) was used (1). Calculations were also used to figure out how much radiation these medicinal plants might cause. The risk indexes and annual effective doses were also considered. Results from our study were compared to global averages set by UNSCEAR and results from other countries. Our findings and comparisons are shown in the following logical order. Figure 4 and Table 2 show the average dry weight activity concentrations of \({}_{.}{}^{226}\text{R}\text{a}, {}_{.}{}^{232}\text{T}\text{h}, \text{a}\text{n}\text{d} {}_{.}{}^{40}\text{K}\) for the medicinal plants that were tested in this study. Each sample and isotope being looked at has a wide range of activities. Different medicinal plants may have different concentrations of NORMs because they have different amounts of radioactive minerals and can absorb certain elements 20.
Table 2
Specific activities (Bq /kg) of 238U (\({}_{.}{}^{226}Ra\)), 232Th and 40K in medicinal plant samples using γ-spectrometer.
Code of sample
|
238U (Bq/kg)
|
232Th (Bq/kg)
|
40K(Bq/kg)
|
H1
|
4.99
|
10.72
|
478.5
|
H2
|
9.3
|
6.33
|
305.8
|
H3
|
1.064
|
2.84
|
391.5
|
H4
|
20.71
|
BDL
|
467.9
|
H5
|
1.49
|
BDL
|
520.6
|
H6
|
BDL
|
9.92
|
316.5
|
H7
|
12.92
|
8.49
|
211.7
|
H8
|
BDL
|
BDL
|
206.5
|
H9
|
BDL
|
BDL
|
623.9
|
H10
|
0.359
|
3.83
|
327.6
|
H11
|
BDL
|
4.26
|
316.5
|
H12
|
3.89
|
10.11
|
847.9
|
H13
|
13.48
|
BDL
|
418.8
|
H14
|
BDL
|
3.017
|
302.7
|
H15
|
0.105
|
BDL
|
292.8
|
H16
|
9.43
|
22.26
|
831.9
|
H17
|
22.13
|
0.706
|
230.7
|
H18
|
2.8
|
3.28
|
1074.9
|
H19
|
2.53
|
7.008
|
226.6
|
H20
|
6.5
|
29.35
|
175.4
|
H21
|
BDL
|
BDL
|
377.5
|
H22
|
18.6
|
BDL
|
425.7
|
H23
|
BDL
|
7.47
|
650.1
|
H24
|
2.55
|
5.61
|
1181.2
|
H25
|
2
|
4
|
172
|
H26
|
BDL
|
4.55
|
643.2
|
H27
|
BDL
|
1.203
|
440.1
|
H28
|
2.95
|
10.78
|
794.5
|
H29
|
BDL
|
BDL
|
418.8
|
Maximum
|
20.71
|
29.35
|
1181.2
|
Minimum
|
BDL
|
BDL
|
172
|
Average
|
7.25
|
7.78
|
471.4
|
The current research is a case in point showed that the concentration levels of 238U varied from BDL to 20.71 \(Bq/Kg\)as observed in 15 plant species more than the BDL values with an average of 7.25 \(Bq/Kg\). Thyme herb (H4) has the highest 238U concentration. 232Th concentrations ranged from BDL to 29.35 \(Bq/Kg\), as observed in 10 plant species more than BDL values with an average of 7.78 \(Bq/Kg\). Cinnamon (H20) has the highest 232Th. The 40K activity concentrations were recorded between 172 \(Bq/Kg\) (turmeric) and 1181.2 \(Bq/Kg\) (cinnamon) with an average value of 471.4 \(Bq/Kg\). Since some of the studied samples have been imported from different regions, the detected activity values of radionuclides are affected due to different levels of natural radioactivity in the soil and environment in those countries. Nevertheless, based on the findings the specific activity values of 238U were in the limit of 33 Bq /Kg in all samples 21.
Furthermore, it was discovered that the specific activity levels of 232Th in all samples were within the range of 45 Bq/ Kg 21. Except for a few samples that were more extensive than the permissible value of 400 Bqkg− 1 (UNSCEAR, 2000), the values of the activity concentration of the 40K are less than the allowable value of 400 Bqkg− 1. Since typical radionuclide activity heights are not regulated across the ground and the flowers' ability to absorb more basic features than others, differences in the concentrations of activity could be attributed to changes in the physical location of the plants and the radiochemical action of the lands in which these medicinal plants are developed or cultivated. The increased potassium activity in these plants might be related to the plants' effectiveness in absorbing potassium as well as other components from the soil 22. Figure 5 shows the range, mean, median line, and outliers’ radioactive elements for measured samples in the region of interest. The current study's activity concentration findings were compared to the published data in Table 3 for a selection of medicinal plants found in the literature, as shown in Fig. 6. This comparison shows that the current findings are relatively consistent with those measured in other nations using the global values indicated in the UNSCEAR 2000 report.
Table 3
The mean activity concentrations of natural radioactivity of medicinal plant samples in the present study were compared with those from similar investigations performed in other countries.
Country
|
U-238
|
Th-232
|
K-40
|
Reference
|
Iraq
|
4.953 ± 0.37
|
2.916 ± 0.12
|
219.134 ± 2.24
|
Kareem etal.,2016
|
South India
|
6.34 ± 0.81
|
5.05 ± 0.7
|
1895.24 ± 103.95
|
Chandrashekara and Somashekarappa .,2016
|
Iraq
|
38.12 ± 1.619
|
12.95 ± 0.896
|
570.70 ± 31.453
|
Hamza etal.,2020
|
Ghana
|
31.8 ± 2.8
|
56.2 ± 2.3
|
839.8 ± 11.9
|
Tettey-Larbi etal.,2013
|
Bangladesh
|
12.65 ± 5.20
|
7.38 ± 3.45
|
661.1 ± 202.6
|
Sultana etal.,2020
|
Jordan
|
2.63 ± 0.30
|
1.44 ± 0.18
|
593.97 ± 63.47
|
Okoor etal.,2019
|
Turkey
|
4.48
|
1.83
|
259.2
|
Kırıs .,2020
|
Turkey
|
BDL
|
BDL
|
1150.8 ± 315.2
|
Turhan et al. 2007
|
Nigeria
|
5.79 ± 1.51
|
4.13 ± 0.55
|
630.03 ± 52.9
|
Alade etal.,2020
|
Nigeria
|
25.02 ± 3.18
|
(35.09 ± 0.71
|
324.18 ± 8.69
|
Njinga et al. 2015
|
Iraq(Al-Basra)
|
17.42 ± 9.47
|
24.32 ± 13.74
|
225.24 ± 100.96
|
Mohammed etal.,2020
|
Serbia
|
2.82
|
0.63,
|
984.32
|
Živkovićetal.,2021
|
World
|
33
|
45
|
420
|
UNSCEAR .,2000
|
Present study
|
7.25
|
7.78
|
471.4
|
|
In a real sense, the current results show that the amount of 238U in the air is much higher than in Iraq 23, South India 24, Jordan 25, Turkey 26, Nigeria 27, Serbia 28, Turkey 29, and lower than those obtained in Iraq 30, Ghana 20, Bangladesh 31, Nigeria 32. The results of 232Th The concentrations obtained are significantly higher than those obtained in Iraq 23, South India 24 Jordan 25, Turkey 26, Turkey 29, Nigeria 27, Serbia 28, and lower than those obtained in Iraq 30, Ghana 20, Nigeria 32. In the case of 40K, Results from our study are significantly higher than those from Iraq 30, Ghana 20, Bangladesh 31, Jordan 25, Turkey 29, Nigeria 27 Serbia 28, and lower than those in Iraq 23, South India 24, Turkey 26. The sources of the raw materials could explain the differences in natural radioactivity concentrations between countries Fig. 6.
The measured outdoor annual effective doses (AEDoutdoor) values for examined herbs have been listed in Table 4. The values are ranged from 0.0108 to 0.0680 mSv/yr, with the mean value of 0.0315 mSv/yr. LEMON BALM (H8) and WORM WOOD (H24) herbs have the lowest and highest AEDoutdoor among all herb samples Fig. 7. The AEDoutdoor results are smaller than the corresponding global value of 1 mSv/yr. The measured indoor annual effective doses (AEDindoor) values for examined herbs have been listed in Table 4. The values are ranged from 0.0810 to 0.5053 mSv/yr, with the mean value of 0.236 mSv/yr. LEMON BALM (H8) and Quince (H23) herbs have the lowest and highest AEDindoor and AEDoutdoor among all herb samples Fig. 7 and Fig. 8. The AEDindoor results are smaller than the corresponding global value of 1 mSv/yr. 0.0919, 0.555, and 0.267 mSv/yr are minimum, maximum, and average total annual effective doses (AEDtot) values for all investigated herbs, respectively. (Lemon Balm) (H8) values and (Lavender)| (H16) herbs have the lowest and highest AEDtotalramong all herb samples values for all investigated herbs, respectively. According to the NSRC and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the annual effective dose equivalent for all tested herbs is less than the annual dose limit of 1mSv for the general population.
Table 4
The outdoor (AEDoutdoor), indoor (AEDindoor) annual effective doses, and total annual effective doses (AEDtot) for different medicinal plant samples.
Code of sample
|

|

|

|

|

|
H1
|
0.0362
|
0.2681
|
0.30441
|
0.01191
|
210.47
|
H2
|
0.0262
|
0.1961
|
0.2224
|
0.3357
|
151.21
|
H3
|
0.0234
|
0.1737
|
0.1971
|
0.00609
|
138.09
|
H4
|
0.0363
|
0.2770
|
0.3134
|
0.50869
|
210.91
|
H5
|
0.0283
|
0.2110
|
0.2391
|
0.00593
|
168.07
|
H6
|
0.0242
|
0.1777
|
0.2025
|
0.00924
|
140.84
|
H7
|
0.0249
|
0.187
|
0.212
|
0.00829
|
141.88
|
H8
|
0.0108
|
0.0810
|
0.091
|
0.002304
|
64.841
|
H9
|
0.0329
|
0.2448
|
0.277
|
0.006962
|
195.90
|
H10
|
0.0204
|
0.1508
|
0.1712
|
0.005891
|
119.98
|
H11
|
0.0138
|
0.1471
|
0.1610
|
0.00598
|
117.18
|
H12
|
0.0546
|
0.4048
|
0.4595
|
0.015601
|
320.52
|
H13
|
0.0288
|
0.2251
|
0.2540
|
0.005765
|
173.15
|
H14
|
0.0182
|
0.1350
|
0.1533
|
0.005115
|
107.65
|
H15
|
0.0155
|
0.1153
|
0.130
|
0.003276
|
92.263
|
H16
|
0.0662
|
0.4891
|
0.555
|
0.022869
|
383.40
|
H17
|
0.0252
|
0.1942
|
0.2194
|
0.00477
|
143.77
|
H18
|
0.0607
|
0.4521
|
0.512
|
0.014111
|
359.88
|
H19
|
0.0187
|
0.1381
|
0.156
|
0.006770
|
108.26
|
H20
|
0.035
|
0.2565
|
0.291
|
0.019389
|
197.84
|
H21
|
0.0199
|
0.1670
|
0.186
|
0.00421
|
118.53
|
H22
|
0.0329
|
0.2955
|
0.328
|
0.006257
|
191.14
|
H23
|
0.0399
|
0.5053
|
0.545
|
0.011557
|
235.35
|
H24
|
0.0680
|
0.0981
|
0.166
|
0.01662
|
402.22
|
H25
|
0.0132
|
0.2769
|
0.290
|
0.004385
|
76.90
|
H26
|
0.0374
|
0.2589
|
0.296
|
0.009798
|
220.98
|
H27
|
0.0241
|
0.1792
|
0.203
|
0.005604
|
143.21
|
H28
|
0.0535
|
0.3832
|
0.436
|
0.015557
|
303.64
|
H29
|
0.0253
|
0.1643
|
0.1896
|
0.004673
|
131.50
|
Maximum
|
0.0680
|
0.5053
|
0.555
|
0.50869
|
402.22
|
Minimum
|
0.0108
|
0.0810
|
0.0919
|
0.002304
|
64.841
|
Average
|
0.0315
|
0.2363
|
0.267
|
0.0373
|
185.1
|
Table 4 and Fig. 9 represent the minimum, maximum, and mean annual effective doses (AACDE) values due to intake 238U, 232Th, and 40K radionuclides through eating the medical plants (Herbs) were equal to 0.002304, 0.50869, and 0.0373 mSv/yr. LEMON BALM (H8) and WORM WOOD (H24) herbs have the lowest and highest AACDE among all herb samples. The AACDE values were lower than the global average (0.3 mSv/yr) for natural radionuclides ingestion reported in the UNSCEAR 2000 report 21. Table 5 illustrates the contrast of our AACDE with those evaluated in Egypt 33, South India 24, Ghana 20, Iraq 30, Thailand 34, Egypt 35. According to the comparison, our result is so smaller than the results found in Egypt 35 and The amount of AACDE higher than the result are found for Egypt 33, South India 24, Ghana 20, Iraq 30, Thailand 34 All of these values are significantly lower than the global average dose 21. Therefore, medicinal plant samples studied here do not be harmful to human health in any way and are considered radiologically safe for adult consumption. From the results, it was found that there are no radiological health risks in the use of these samples.
Table 5
Comparison between AACED ingestion dose of the present medicial plant samples with that of other countries of the world
Country
|
AACED(ingestion)
|
Reference
|
Egypt
|
0.003 to 0.073
|
Harb.,2021
|
South India
|
0.0075 to 0.1067
|
Chandrashekara and Somashekarappa.,2016
|
Ghana
|
0.0261 to 0.042
|
Tettey-Larbi etal.,2013
|
Iraq
|
0.010399 to 0.002757
|
Hamza etal.,2020
|
Thailand
|
0.0001 to 0.0327
|
Kranrod et al 2016
|
Egyt
|
0.6 to 2.0
|
Ahmed etal.,2010
|
Turkey
|
0.3 to 9.0
0.3
|
Parmaksız and Ağuş, 2014
|
World
|
|
UNSCEAR, 2000
|
Present study
|
0.50869 to 0.002304
|
|
The annual gonadal dose equivalent (AGDE) for medicinal plants is shown in Fig. 10 and listed in Table 4. AGDE values range from 402.2 to 64.8 µSv/yr with an average 185.1 µSv/yr. All values are less than their corresponding global value is 300 \(\mu Sv/yr\) 21, except for WORM WOOD (H24). These measurements provide information on the local drugs for these models to formulate guidelines related to radiological health care.
The outdoor absorbed dose rate (Doutdoor) values have been estimated for the medicinal plants' samples, as shown in Table 6. It was found that the values of the Doutdoor vary from 55.46 to 8.87 nGy/h with the mean value of 22.75 nGy/h. The lowest value was found in the sample (LEMON BALM) and the highest value in the (WORM WOOD) sample. The values of the absorbed dose rate for all samples were less than the permissible level of 84 nGy h-1 according to UNSCEAR has recommended that the average exposure rate of the population should be within 84 nGy/h.While the indoor absorbed dose rate (Dindoor) values are ranged from 103.01 to 16.52 nGy/h, with an average value of 48.183 nGy/h. The lowest value was found in (LEMON BALM) and the highest in a sample (QUINCE). 1The values of the absorbed dose rate for all samples were less than the permissible level of 84 nGy h-1 according to UNSCEAR has recommended that the population's average exposure rate be kept within 84 nGy/h.
Table 6
Out-door, in-door absorbed dose rate, internal hazard index (Hin), external hazard index (Hex) and radioactivity level index (Iγ) for different medicinal plant samples.
sample
|
Doutdoor (nGy /h)
|
Dindoor (nGy/ h)
|
Hin
|
Hex
|
Iγ
|
H1
|
29.55
|
54.66
|
0.1678
|
0.1558
|
0.459
|
H2
|
21.38
|
39.98
|
0.1382
|
0.1140
|
0.3291
|
H3
|
19.09
|
35.42
|
0.0981
|
0.0956
|
0.2965
|
H4
|
29.67
|
56.48
|
0.2092
|
0.1532
|
0.4500
|
H5
|
23.072
|
43.01
|
0.1162
|
0.1122
|
0.357
|
H6
|
19.79
|
36.23
|
0.10410
|
0.105
|
0.3102
|
H7
|
20.35
|
38.16
|
0.1466
|
0.1129
|
0.3121
|
H8
|
8.879
|
16.52
|
0.0429
|
0.0429
|
0.1376
|
H9
|
26.82
|
49.91
|
0.1297
|
0.1297
|
0.4159
|
H10
|
16.641
|
30.75
|
0.0848
|
0.0844
|
0.259
|
H11
|
11.303
|
30.00
|
0.0582
|
0.0588
|
0.176
|
H12
|
44.55
|
82.53
|
0.2419
|
0.2272
|
0.692
|
H13
|
23.55
|
45.90
|
0.1599
|
0.1235
|
0.369
|
H14
|
14.89
|
27.53
|
0.0745
|
0.075
|
0.231
|
H15
|
12.641
|
23.52
|
0.0614
|
0.0611
|
0.195
|
H16
|
53.99
|
99.71
|
0.3099
|
0.2874
|
0.840
|
H17
|
20.563
|
39.59
|
0.1703
|
0.11059
|
0.3084
|
H18
|
49.560
|
92.176
|
0.2513
|
0.2441
|
0.768
|
H19
|
15.27
|
28.16
|
0.0878
|
0.0819
|
0.2380
|
H20
|
28.83
|
52.29
|
0.184
|
0.1714
|
0.4538
|
H21
|
16.23
|
34.05
|
0.0784
|
0.0784
|
0.251
|
H22
|
26.88
|
60.24
|
0.1890
|
0.1387
|
0.407
|
H23
|
32.60
|
103.01
|
0.1639
|
0.1650
|
0.508
|
H24
|
55.46
|
20
|
0.2810
|
0.2749
|
0.860
|
H25
|
10.81
|
56.461
|
0.0620
|
0.0571
|
0.168
|
H26
|
30.49
|
52.77
|
0.1513
|
0.1519
|
0.474
|
H27
|
19.67
|
36.53
|
0.0961
|
0.0963
|
0.305
|
H28
|
43.62
|
78.13
|
0.2389
|
0.2243
|
0.677
|
H29
|
20.64
|
33.50
|
0.0998
|
0.0998
|
0.320
|
Maximum
|
55.46
|
103.01
|
0.3099
|
0.2874
|
0.860
|
Minimum
|
8.879
|
16.52
|
0.0429
|
0.0429
|
0.137
|
Average
|
22.75
|
|
0.1448
|
0.1322
|
0.399
|
According to UNSCEAR, the average indoor absorbed dose rate values for all samples are below the permissible level of 59 nGy h− 1. The external and internal hazard indexes are shown in Table 6, and their maximum values are 0.287 and 0.3099, respectively. At the same time, the minimum values were 0.0429 and 0.0429, respectively. The average values were 0.1322 and 0.1448. The estimated values of extrinsic and intrinsic risk indices for all types of medicinal plant samples analyzed in this work were below the recommended limit of 1 21. Therefore, to reduce the annual effective dose to ≤ 1.5 mSv, for the safe use of these plants. Because of the calculated radioactivity level index in Table 6. The values are ranged from 0.860 maximum value in(Worm wood) sample to 0.1376 minimum value in the (Lemon Balm) sample, with an average value of 0.399. All values of the calculated radioactivity level index (Iγ) for the samples were checked below the permissible levels 21.
Excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) values are ranged from the maximum value (1.7804×10− 3) in (Thyme herb) to the minimum value (0.00806×10− 3) in (Lemon Balm), with an average value (0.1307×10− 3). The mean value of ELCR is less than the global average of 2.9 × 10− 4 based on the annual dose limit of (1mSv) for the general public by UNSCEAR, ICRP 21,36 as shown in Table 7.
Table 7
The excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) for the investigated samples.
Sample
|
ELCR×10− 3
|
Sample
|
ELCR×10− 3
|
H1
|
0.0417
|
H16
|
0.08004
|
H2
|
1.1751
|
H17
|
0.01670
|
H3
|
0.0213
|
H18
|
0.0493
|
H4
|
1.7804
|
H19
|
0.0236
|
H5
|
0.0207
|
H20
|
0.0678
|
H6
|
0.0323
|
H21
|
0.0147
|
H7
|
0.0290
|
H22
|
0.0219
|
H8
|
0.00806
|
H23
|
0.0404
|
H9
|
0.0243
|
H24
|
0.0581
|
H10
|
0.02061
|
H25
|
0.0153
|
H11
|
0.0209
|
H26
|
0.0342
|
H12
|
0.0546
|
H27
|
0.0196
|
H13
|
0.02018
|
H28
|
0.0544
|
H14
|
0.01790
|
H29
|
0.0163
|
H15
|
0.01146
|
|
|
Maximum
|
1.7751
|
Minimum
|
0.00806
|
Average
|
0.131
|