Prevalence and associated risk factors of abdominal obesity among civil servant women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2021: institutional based cross- sectional study

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1542491/v1

Abstract

Background: Abdominal obesity remains to be a major public health problem connected to an increased risk of disease, disability, poor quality of life, and increased health-care costs. It has been also related to metabolic syndrome, like hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and other non-communicable diseases. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of abdominal obesity and associated risk factors among female civil servants in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2021.

Method and materials:An institutional based cross-sectional study was undertaken from 31th of March to 15th of April, 2021.A two stage random sampling techniquewas employed to select 451 study participants. Data was edited, coded and entered into Epi data version 3.1 and then exported to SPSS version 21 for analysis. Descriptive data analysis was used to present the distribution of study variable.Bivariable and multivariable analysis were used to assess the relationship between independent variables and abdominal obesity. The level of statistical significance was declared at p-value less than 0.05.

Result: The prevalence of abdominal obesity by waist circumference was found to be 29.5 %

(95% CI: 25.39-33.6%). In multivariable logistic regression model age group 29-37 years [AOR= 2.553, 95% CI: (1.237-5.271)], age group 38-46 years [AOR=4.027, 95% CI: (1.360-11.925)], age group 47-55 [AOR=7.008, 95% CI: (1.463-33.578)], being married [AOR= 4.736, 95% CI: (2.290-9.798)] consumption of meat 1-4 times per week[AOR=2.341, 95% CI: (1.215-4.509)], consumption of meat >=5 per week [ AOR= 5.257, 95% CI: (2.068-13.364)], and having lunch daily[AOR= 0.331, 95% CI: (0.136-0.804)] were significantly associated with abdomial obesity.

Conclusion: Prevalence of abdominal by waist circumference was 29.5%..Age, being married, high consumption of meat, having lunch daily were identified as a risk factors for abdominal obesity. So, awareness creation about age induced abdominal obesity for older and middle age group is needed. Likewise, promotion to use diversified food rather than consuming meat based diet can reduce the risk of abdominal obesity in combination with other nutrition intervention methods.

Background

Obesity is defined as a condition of energy metabolism characterized by irregular fat accumulation and excessive visceral fat deposition which is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular illnesses (1). It is a major public health problem in both developed and developing countries affecting all ages, genders, and being linked to a number of chronic diseases like type 2 diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and cancer(2-4).

Obesity in the abdomen is linked to higher risk of morbidity, disability, poor quality of life, mortality, and higher health-care expenses (5-8).The prevalence of elevated WC(waist circumference) in adults has been demonstrated to be independently risk factors for metabolic syndrome, like hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and other non-communicable diseases. In adults, studies have reported a higher association between waist circumference and these anomalies than with BMI (Body Mass Index)(9)

In 2016, more than 1.9 billion adults aged 18 and above were overweight and over 650 million of them were fat. Furthermore, 39% of adults aged 18 and above were overweight, with 13% being obese (10).  

To evaluate body fatness, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), skin fold thickness, and bio-impedance were used to classify obesity as overweight, general obesity, abdominal obesity (AO), visceral fat obesity (VFO), and other forms. The most common variables used to identify these were BMI and waist circumference (WC) (11). In comparison to other anthropometric indicators, abdominal fat assessment is one of the best predictors of visceral fat, which is significantly linked with most metabolic risk factors(12). 

The waist circumference (WC) measurement has been described as a better tool for assessing body fat distribution, especially abdominal visceral adiposity, which has been linked to a variety of non-communicable diseases.In a clinical or epidemiological setting, measuring WC is also a faster and less expensive way to determine visceral fat than other gold standard methods like computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging(9). 

Despite the fact that studies on central obesity in Africa are few, recent research has revealed an unprecedented rise in central obesity prevalence(3).According to the estimate of WHO, in 2014 1.2% ofmen and 6.0% of females were either overweight or obese in Ethiopia. Between 1997 and 2016, the combined prevalence in the country grew considerably from2.6 to 6.9% in females and, from 0.6 to 1.9% in males(13). 

Similarly, in Ethiopia study done in 2015 reported that the prevalence of overweight and obese people in urban areas was 12.1% and 2.8 percent, respectively (5).The prevalence of central obesity among women was found to be 27.9% and 86.9%, respectively, in a recent study conducted in woldia and urban areas of Northwest Ethiopia(14, 15). So this study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors of abdominal obesity among women civil servant in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 

From the data of 2018 World Health Organization,   the NCDs Country Profiles of Ethiopia   was estimated that the deaths from CVDs, cancers, diabetes, others NCDs were 16%, 7%, 2%, 12% respectively and the total estimated deaths from NCDs was 39% of all deaths (16). The incidence of obesity and central obesity is rising in Ethiopia, as shown here, and the percentage of deaths from non-communicable disease is also rising. These deaths, as reported in few studies were may be an indicator of central obesity in Ethiopia at present. 

According EDHS 2016 the proportion of women who were overweight or obese had increased from 3% in 2000 to 8% in 2016 and the proportion of men who were obese were found to be 3% (17).Even thought there are no well documented national data and studies on central obesity, there are few studies done on central obesity in different part of Ethiopia, which revealed that the prevalence of central obesity is currently increasing.  For instance,   according to study done in  Dilla, Gonder, Diredawa, urban areas of Northwest  Ethiopia, the prevalence of central obesity found to be 24.4%, 33.6%, 46.6%, 37.6%, respectively(15, 18-20).

However evidences are not available particularly for civil servant women in Ethiopia. Therefore,the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors of abdominal obesity among civil servant women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2021.

Methods

Study area, Study design and Study period

An institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors of abdominal obesity among civil servant women in Addis Ababa city, the capital of Ethiopia from June 3rd to 23th June, 2021.  There were 11 sub cities and 117 district level administration offices, within which a total of 38, 649 working adults were reported. Regarding to health institution the city had a total of 13 public and 22 private hospitals, as well as 96 health centers. 

Study participants

Women working as civil servant in Addis Ababa city administration at different district and willing to participate in the study were included. Women who have deformity around hip and abdominal area and who were not permanent were excluded.  

Sample size determination

Sample size was calculated by using a single population proportion formula

considering 95% confidence level, 5% margin of error (MOE) and  proportion of central obesity from study done in dilla 27.3% (18). Adding a 5% non respondent rate and 1.5% of design effect [Deff], the final sample size was 478. 

Sampling technique and procedure

A simple random sampling method was applied to select the study area and participants. First as a primary sampling unit the three sub cities namely Kerkos, Yeka and Bole were selected randomly which were covered 30% of the total sub cities of Addis Ababa.  Then, a representative three district’s (woreda’s) from each selected sub cities were taken randomly as a secondary sampling unit. Finally, the calculated samples were allocated using population propositional to size to each woreda based on their total number of civil servants.  The list of civil servant workers (sampling frame) obtained from each selected woreda administration and the participants were selected from it randomly.  

Data collection tools and procedures

Structured interviewer administered questionnaire was   adapted from WHO-STEP wise structured questionnaire for chronic non-communicable disease having components of socio-demographic information, dietary intakes, physical activity and health risky behavior questions and anthropometric measurement used. 

Participants/ study subjects/ was interviewed for their socio-demographic information, dietary intakes, physical activity and health risky behavior. Anthropometric measurement was taken at the end of theinterview.Food consumption habit of the participants was investigated by semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) by FAO and Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) modified from WHO-STEP wise approach consisting of foods commonly consumed by the study population.Participants were asked to report their frequency of consumption number of times consumed weekly (21, 22). 

Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) developed by WHO for physical activity surveillance was  used to assess the physical activity pattern among selected individuals in three domains including activity at work, travel to and from places and recreational activities and sedentary behavior through face-to-face interview of the respondent in the study area. The activity level of the study participants was evaluated according to the standard WHO total physical activity calculation guide and the level of total physical activity was categorized as physicallyactive met(>600 EM) and physically in-active(<600 EM)(23). 

Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower margin of the least palpable rib and the top of the iliac crest, using a stretch‐resistant tape that provides a constant 100 g tension. The measurements of WC, the subject were stand with feet close together, arms at the side and body weight evenly distributed, and should wear little clothing. The subject should be relaxed, and the measurements should be taken at the end of a normal expiration. The measurements were repeated twice; if the measurements are within 1 cm of one another, the average should be calculated. If the difference between the two measurements exceeds 1 cm, the two measurements were be repeated. Measurement was taken before meal or three hours after meal. The measurement was also taken when the participant is at the end of the gentle expiration, after taking a deep inhalation with the tape snug but ensuring it is not compressing the skin(24). 

Data Quality Management

The research instrument which was used to measure the abdominal obesity and associated risk factors as properly calibrated by defining each concept and  assess for content validity, in which the instrument items are  adapted from WHO-STEP wise approach questionnaire found online by Google search and other standard questionnaire from FAO. To assess whether the instrument covered all dimensions of the construct, literature and experts in the field was properly consulted. On the other hand to maximize the data quality, data collectors was selected carefully based on their educational status. The training was also given on the nature and reason of the research and objective of the study. 

Data processing and analysis 

After checking completeness and consistency manually data was edited, coded and entered on to Epi-data version 3.1, and then it was exported to SPSS version 21 for further analysis.  Descriptive data analysis was taken primarily to summarize the study variables. Then, a binary logistic regression model was fitted to assess any relationship between each independent variable (socio-demographic characteristics, behavioral factors, dietary factors and physical activity) and outcome variable (Abdominal obesity). It was conducted under two stages. First, bi-variable analysis was carried out to show any associations between the dependent and each independent variable. Then, variables with p-value less than 0.25 were included in a multi-variable analysis and it was used to show a combined effect of independent variables on dependent variable. Statistical significances were declared at P value less than 0.05. Finally, the results were presented in statistical tables, chart, and graph.

Results

Socio demographic characteristics

From a total of 478  study particpiants a compelete infromation were obtained from 451 working civil servants women wich gave a response rate of   94.4%.   The mean and the standard deviation of the respondent age were 30.11 (±6.86) years, of which the 55% respondentswere between age group 20-28 years.  Among the study participants 48.3% and 48.6% were single and married respectively. More than half (68.1%) of the study participants were degree holder.  Only 6% of the study participants were with educational level of masters and above.

Of the participants’ orthodox tewahido(81.6%) religion followers were the highest followed by Protestants (12%) and Muslims (4.4%). The mean (SD) of the respondents salary was 5459.92(±2021.16) Ethiopian birr. 23.1% of the respondents got monthly salary less than 3934 Ethiopian birr.  The mean of family size of the respondent was 3.57, of which 56.8 % of the respondents had family size four and above (Table 1).  

Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of the civil servant women in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia, 2021(n=451)

Variable 

Frequency

Percent

Age

20-28

248

55.0

29-37

140

31.0

38-46

48

10.6

47-55

15

3.3

Marital status

 

 

Single

218

48.3

Married

219

48.6

Divorced

14

3.1

level of education

 

 

college diploma

117

25.9

Degree

307

68.1

masters and above

27

6

Religion

 

 

Orthodox tewahido

368

81.6

Protestant

54

12.0

Muslim

20

4.4

Catholics9                            2

Salary

 

 

<3934

104

23.1

3934-7070

192

42.6

>=7071

155

34.4

Family size

 

 

<=3

195

43.2

>=4

256

56.8

 Age 

 

 

20-28

248

55.0

29-37

140

31.0

38-46

48

10.6

47-55153.3

 Food consumption Frequency factors

According to the data obtained from food frequency, of the total respondent, 44.6 % consumed fruit three or less times per month and 41.7% consumed within a week. 53.2% study participants were consumed vegetable 1-4 times per week. Regarding the consumption of bread and cereals, 41.5% consumed daily and 58.5% consumed not daily.  According to this data cereals were the common source of food group among respondents. More than half of the respondents (61.2%, 58.1%, 53.7, 69.2%, and 66.5%) consumed meat, legumes, milk products, fast food, and sweetened beverages three or less times in a month respectively (Table 2). 

Table 2

Food consumption frequency among civil servant women in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia, 2021(n=451).

Variable

frequency

Percent

Fruit

 

 

three or less times monthly

201

44.6

1-4 per week

188

41.7

>=5 times per week

62

13.7

Vegetables

 

 

three or less times monthly

112

24.8

1-4 times per week

247

54.8

>=5 times per week

92

20.4

Bread and creals

 

 

not daily

264

58.5

Daily

187

41.5

Egg

 

 

less than once in a month

48

10.6

1-3 times monthly

140

31.0

>=1 per week

263

58.3

Meat

 

 

three or less times monthly

276

61.2

1-4 times per week

117

25.9

>=5 times per week

58

12.9

Legumes 

 

 

three or less times monthly

262

58.1

1-4 per week

135

29.9

>=5 times per week

54

12.0

 

 

 

Milk, cheese, yogurt

 

 

three or less times monthly

242

53.7

1-4 times per week

155

34.4

>=5 times per week

54

12.0

Sweets

 

 

three or less times monthly

209

46.3

1-4 times per week

129

28.6

>=5 times per week

113

25.1

Fast food

 

 

three or less times monthly

312

69.2

1-4 times per week

108

23.9

>=5 times per week

31

6.9

 sweetened beverages

 

 

three or less times monthly

300

66.5

1-4 times per week

>=5 times per week

106

45

23.5

10.0

 

Dietary habit factor

Of the total respondents, 88.9 % had three and more meals per day and only 11.1% had less than three meals per day. Nearly three fourth (70.1%)of the study participantsreported that they didn't consume breakfast on a daily basis. Only 29.9% of the respondents were consumed breakfast on a daily basis.The majority of the respondents (88%,86.7%) were consumed lunch and dinner on a daily basis respectively. More than two third(63.6%) of respondents were commonly used seed oil (sunflower) for household food preparation,followed byPalm oil(28.4%) and butter(8%).Of the total study participants, 80.1% of  the respondents  reported that they were used meal prepared at home on daily basis (Table 3).

Table 3

 dietary habit among civil servant women in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia 2021(n=451)

Variable 

                    frequency

                  Percent

Number of meals per day

 

 

<3 meal per day

50

11.1

>=3 meal per day

401

88.9

Breakfast

 

 

not daily

54

70.1

Daily

397

29.9

Lunch

 

 

not daily

54

12.0

Daily

397

88.0

Snack

 

 

No

311

69.0

Yes

140

31.0

Number of snack

 

 

No

311

69

<=2 per day

101

22.4

>=3 per day                                                         39                  8.6

Dinner

 

 

not daily

60

13.3

Daily

391

86.7

Eat during bed times

 

 

not daily

407

90.2

Daily

44

9.8

meal out of home

 

 

Never

88

19.5

not daily

329

72.9

Daily

34

7.5

meal prepared at home

 

 

not daily

87

19.3

Daily

364

80.7

Oil most used

 

 

seed oil

287

63.6

palm oil

128

28.4

Butter368.0

  

Beahavioral factor 

Of the total study participants, 98.7% were non-smoker. Nearly three fourth (73.2) of the respondents were not ever consumed alcohol. About 96.2 % of the respondents never chewed khat throughout their lifetime. Study participants who meet the WHO recommendation of total physical activity level were 5.8% and the rest (38.8%) didn’t meet the WHO recommendation. Resondents who were not participatein any physical activity were 55.4%  (Table 4).

Table 4

behavioral factor of civil servant women in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia, 2021( n=451)

Variable 

Frequency

Percent

Ever smoked tobacco

 

 

No

445

98.7

Yes

6

1.3

current smoker

 

 

No

447

99.1

Yes

4

0.9

No of cigarette sticks smoke in a day

 

 

No smokein a day

445

98.7

< =5 sticks

5

1.1

>= 6 sticks

1

0.2

Ever alcohol consumption

 

 

No

330

73.2

Yes

121

26.8

number of standard drinks 

 

 

No drink

332

73.6

< 2 standard drinking

40

8.9

>=2 standard drinking

79

17.5

Frequency of alcohol drink

 

 

No drink

330

73.2

Daily

11

2.4

>=1 per week

77

17.1

<1 in a month

33

7.3

khat chewing

 

 

No

434

96.2

Yes

17

3.8

Total physical activity level

 

 

no physical activity

250

55.4

< 600MET(un meet)

175

38.8

>=600(meet)

26

5.8

time spend sitting or reclining 

 

 

< 5 hour

142

31.5

5-8 hour

309

68.5

Prevalence of abdominal obesity

The prevalence of abdominal obesity among civil servant women working in Addis Ababa by waist circumference(WC) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) were 29.5% (95% CI:25.39% -33.61%) and 32.8% (95%CI:28.57%-37.03%)  respectively. The prevalence of abdominal obesity was highest among the age groups of 27-38 by both waist circumference (12.4%) and waist-hip ratio (13.3%) respectively. The prevalence was lowest among the age group 47-55 years, by both WC (2.3%) and WHR (1.3%) (Table 5, figure 1).

Table 5

 pervalence of abdominal obesity among civil servant women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2021(n=451)

 

Variable 

frequency

Percent

95%CI

Abdominal obesity by waist circumference (WC)

 

 

 

No

318

70.5

70.5 (66.3-74.7)

Yes

133

29.5

29.5 (25.3-33.7)

Abdominal obesity by  waist to hip ratio(WHR)

 

 

 

No

303

67.2

67.2 (62.7-71.6)

Yes

148

32.8

32.8 (37.3-37.3)

The mean (SD) of waist circumferenceamong civil servant women working in Addis Ababa were 79.40(11.28) cm. Both mean of waist circumference and waist hip ratio among civil servant women was slightly lower than the WHO cut-off points. 

Factors associated with abdominal obesity 

In multi-viariable logistic regression analysis variables with p-value less than 0.25 from bi-variable analysis were included. As a result, age, marital status, consumption of meat, consumption of snack and having lunch daily were statistically significant associated with abdominal obesity at p-value less than 0.05. Age group 29-37 years, 38-46 years and 47-55 years were 2.451[(AOR=2.451, 95% CI: (1.199-5.013),3.807(AOR=3.807,95%CI:(1.328-10.914), and 6.489(AOR=6.489, 95%CI: (1.367-30.805) times more likely to develop abdominal obesity than age group 20-28 years respectively.

Being married was 4.762 times more likely to develop abdominal obesity [AOR=4.762;95% CI:( 2.321-9.771)] thanunmarriedwomen.Respondents who consumedmeat greater or equal to five times per week were found to be 4.764 times to develop abdominal obesity[AOR=4.764; 95% CI= (1.939-11.711 )] as compared to those who consumed meat three or less times monthly.Having lunch daily was 61.2% lower to develop abdominal obesity as compared tothe counterparts [AOR=0.388, 95% CI: (0.166-0.910 )]. Respondents who consumed snack were 4.163 times more likely to be abdominally obese than who did not consume snack[AOR= 4.163 ; 95% CI:( 1.503-11.534)(Table 6).

Table 6

Multi logistic regression of factors associated with abdominal obesity by waist circumference among civil servant women in Addis Ababa, 2021(n=451)

 

abdominal obesity by WC

Odd ratio( CI 95%)

   Variable

Yes(obese)

No(normal)

        COR

          AOR

Age

 

 

 

 

20-28

39

209

1

1

29-37

56

84

3.57(2.20-5.77)*

2.451(1.199-5.013)*

38-46

28

20

7.50(3.8-14.63)*

3.807(1.328-10.914)*

47-55

10

5

10.718(3.474-33.68)*

6.489(1.367-30.805)*

Marital status

 

 

 

 

Single

28

190

1

1

Married

101

118

5.808(3.603- 9.363)*

4.762(2.321-9.771)*

Divorced

4

10

2.714(0.797-9.245)

0.686(0.139-3.394)

Religion

 

 

 

 

Orthodox tewahido

108

260

1

1

Protestant

19

35

1.30(0.716-2.386)

1.893( 0.822-4.362)

Muslim

3

17

0.425(0.122-1.479)

.610(0.126-2.961)

Catholics

3

3

2.407(0.478-12.116)

5.070(0.460-55.941)

Salary

 

 

 

 

<3934

19

85

1

1

3934-7070

48

144

1.49(0.822-2.704)

1.093(0.497-2.404)

>=7071

66

89

3.318(1.83-5.98)*

1.192(0.500-2.844)

Family size

 

 

 

 

<=3

39

156

0.431(0.279-0.664)*

0.959(0.531-1.732)

>=4

94

162

1

1

Bread and cereals

 

 

 

 

not daily

71

193

1

1

once or more times per day

62

125

1.348(0.896-2.028)

1.031(0.582-1.825)

Fruit

 

 

 

 

three or less times monthly

49

152

0.677(0.363-1.261)

0.994(0.405-2.439)

1-4 per week

64

124

1.084(0.588-1.99)

1.221(0.510-2.921)

>=5 times per week

20

42

1

1

Meat

 

 

 

 

three or less times monthly

56

220

1

1

1-4 times per week

47

70

2.638(1.646-4.228)*

2.287(1.209- 4.325)*

>=5 times per week

30

28

4.209(2.327-7.614)*

4.764(1.939-11.711)*

Legumes 

 

 

 

 

three or less times monthly

68

194

1

1

1-4 per week

47

88

1.524(0.972-2.388)

.890(0.312-1.654)

>=5 times per week

18

36

1.426(0.76-2.677)

.885(0.362-2.163)

Milk, cheese, yogurt

 

 

 

 

three or less times monthly

64

178

1

1

1-4 times per week

47

108

1.210(0.775-1.891)

.607(0.312-1.181)

>=5 times per week

22

32

1.912(1.035-3.531)*

.768(0.308-1.915)

Sweets

 

 

 

 

three or less times monthly

48

161

1

1

1-4 times per week

51

78

2.193(1.360-3.537)*

1.937(0.987-3.802)

>=5 times per week

34

79

1.444(0.862-2.417)

1.923(0.888-3.940)

sweetened beverages

 

 

 

 

three or less times monthly

82

218

1

1

1-4 times per week

30

76

1.049(0.641- 1.718)

.751(0.357-1.578)

>=5 times per week

21

24

2.326(1.229- 4.404)*

1.844(0.712-4.776)

Number of  meal per day

 

 

 

 

<3 meal per day

10

40

1

1

>=3 meal per day

123

278

1.770(0.857- 3.653)

1.137(0.451-2.866)

Lunch

 

 

 

 

not daily

21

33

1

1

Daily

112

112

0.618(0.343-1.113)

0.388(0.166-0.910)*

meal prepared at home

 

 

 

 

not daily

19

68

0.613(0.352- 1.062)

0.837(0.375-1.867)

Daily

114

250

1

 

Snack

 

 

 

 

No

81

230

1

1

Yes

52

88

1.678(1.096- 2.570)*

4.163(1.503-11.534)*

Frequency of alcohol drink

 

 

 

 

No drink

75

255

1

1

Daily

5

6

1.414(0.404-4.940)

0.923(0.152-5.602)

>=1 per week

42

35

2.539(1.530- 4.212)*

2.426(0.768-7.663)

<1 in a month

11

22

1.076(0.493-2.346)

NA

time spend sitting or reclining

 

 

 

 

< 5 hour

29

113

1

1

5-8 hour

104

205

1.977(1.234- 3.167)*

1.087(0.580-2.039)

*Significantly associated variables at p-value <0.05, 1—Reference group.

Abbreviations: AOR—Adjusted odds ratio, COR, crude odd ratio

Discussion

This study was aimed to determine the  prevalence and associated risk factors of abdominal obesity among civil servant women in Addis Ababa. The overall magnitude of abdominal obesity defined by waist circumference and waist hip ratio among civil servant women were found to be 29.5% and 32.8% respectively. This result was slightly greater than the study done in dilla based on WC (27.3%)(18), woldia town based on both by WC and WHR (24.3%, 27.9%)(14) and also higher than the study in Addis Ababa among working adultsbased on WC(19.6%) (25). The possible explanation for the differencecould be the fact that a difference in study place and setting, study period, variation in WC and WHR cut off points and sociodemographic disparities. The prevalence of abdominal obesity could be high in Addis Ababa when compared to findings from dilla and woldia this might be due to the life style changes in Addis Ababa, sedentary behavior of civil servants and nutrition transition adopted from westerns.

A study conducted in Ghana among female teachers revealed that the prevalence of abdominal obesity defined by WHR and WC was found to be 17.8%(lower) and 59%(higher)(26), respectively, which was not consistent with the current study prevalence of abdominal obesity defined by WHR (32.8%) and WC (29.5%).The difference in these results might be due to the study period and WHR and WC cut-off points. Study done in Ghana considered WC >=80 cm, while this study considered WC >88cm.The study conducted in Ghana considered WHR > 0.85, but this study considered abdominal obesity >= 0.85. The other possible explanation for the difference could be sociodemographic factors and dietary patterns.

The prevalence of abdominal obesity (85.9 %)  defined by WC in northwesturban areas of Ethiopia(15)among womenwas high when compared to the current study(29.5%). Likewise, the current finding was higher than the study conducted in Nigeria among civil servants23.1% (27) and lower than the study done in Russia 44%(28) among bank employees. The difference could be study period, WHO cut-off point variation, socioeconomic difference, socio-demographic factorsand dietary intake pattern.

The prevalence of abdominal obesity by WC in Gaza strip-Palestine was 82.2% which was very high when compared to the current study of abdominal obesity by WC. The difference might be due to WHO cut off pointsand socio-cultural and economic differences(29). The study findings of Gaza strip-Palestine considered WC >=80 cm but the current study considerswaist circumference(WC) greater than 88 cm. The other possible explanation for the difference might be the type of food consumed, socio-economic status, age of the study participants; the current study considered age from 20 and the study in Palestine starts from greater or equal to 26 years.

Likewise, a study done in Panama among women showed the highest prevalence of abdominal obesity which was reported by WC (97.9%) that was three times of the current study (30). This might be because Panamanian women consume beverages or sugar-rich foods and socio-demographic characteristics. Consumption of beverages/foods rich in sugar was statistically significant with abdominal obesity among Panamanian women.Similarly, the prevalence of abdominal study conducted in Indonesia (68.3%) among adult female employees was higher than the current study but a study conducted in Iran (34.6%) among adult females was almost consistent with this study (31, 32)

This study revealed thatas age increased the odds of being abdominally obese also increased by WC.The age groups 29-37, 38-46, and 47-55 years were 2.553, 4.027 and 7.008 times to develop abdominal obesity respectively as compared to the age group 20-29. This result was consistent with a study conducted in Nigeria among civilservants and southern America (33, 34). This might be due to sex hormone changes anda decrease in physical activity levels as age increases.The finding of this studyalso revealed thatthe age group 29-37 and 38-46 years were significantly associated with AO defined by WHR, but the age group 47-55 years was not associated with AO unlike that of WC.Thus , this finding was inconsistent with the finding from Ghana(26).

Marital status was one of the predictors of abdominal obesity among civil servant women in this study.This result was consistent with studies conductedin Greek, Nigeria, and Iran (35-37). This can be explained by the fact that women after marriage may have less physical activity, change dietary patterns, pregnancy induced social support. Married womenhave more social support than those who are not married. This marital support can lead to obesity through food, activity and social values. Some people control their weight to attract mate, and once they get married weight control may be less valued so that diet/exercise behaviors for slimness may be neglected or they may not give attention for attractiveness once they have got their own(37). 

The findings of this study revealed that consumption of meat 1-4 and >=5 times perweek were associated with abdominal obesity by WC. It revealed that the more you consume meatThe odds to develop abdominal obesity who ate meat 1-4 perweek and was 2.342 times as compared to those who ate meat three or less times in a month. Likewise, using meat products greater than or equal to five times perweek increasedthe chance of getting abdominal obesity by 5.257 times greater than those who consumed three or less times in amonth.This happen because meats have high energy and high fat content that might be associated with higher risk of, overweight, general and central obesity(38).This result was similar with study done in USA ,Woldia and Hawassa (13, 14, 39).

Having lunch daily was significantly associated with abdominal obesity in this study.Consequently, the odds of  abdominal obesity was 61.2% lower in those who had lunch daily than the counterpart. Findings from china also showed that skipping lunch was positively associated with obesity in women(40). In general, findings from various studies have confirmed that meals skipping are associated with overweight, obesity and abdominal obesity (9, 41, 42).It might be due to decreased thermic effect of food after an irregular meal pattern when compared with individuals with a regular meal pattern. The reduced thermic effect with the irregular meal frequency may lead to weight gain in the long term(43).

This study revealed thatconsumption of snack 4.163 and 3.270 times more likely to develop abdominal obesity measured by WC and WHR than those who didn’t consume snack respectively. Even though the relationship between snacking and obesity or abdominal obesity is not clear, some studies have found that the increased consumption of energy-dense, high-sugar, high-fat meals, snacking has been regarded one of the key factors to obesity(44). Other studies failed to establish the relationship between snacking and obesity or abdominal obesity(45). This is because the type of snack practicedmatters. Those who ate energy-dense and sugary snacks may susceptible to abdominal obesity and those who ate healthy snack intake may not develop abdominal obesity.This result is supported by study conducted in Association south east Asian Nation countries and northeast Ethiopia(46, 47).  

Limitation

This study could have some limitations which affect the result directly or indirectly. Some of the limitations emanate from the nature of the cross-sectional study since the outcome (abdominal obesity) and predictors variables relationship were temporal and examined at the same time, therefore no causal deduction can be made.This study was not included other measurement like skin fold thickness. The portion size of food consumed by respondents was not assessed.  Type snack they were practicing were not identified. On the other hand, there might be over and underestimations of food frequency and meal habit, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, time spend sitting and reclining due to recall bias. 

Conclusion

A high prevalence of abdominal obesity was found among civil servant women in Addis Ababa city. This study showed that as age increased, the risk to develop abdominal obesity was increased. Likewise, respondents who consumed more meat based diet had increased the risk to develop abdominal obesity. In this study, being married, age, consumption of meat and having lunch daily were among predictors that were significantly associated with abdominal obesity. Addis Ababa city administration health office should give special awareness creation should be given for married and older age group civil servant women in collaboration with other stake holders like city administration of women affairs and education office regarding abdominal obesity.Regular health educations have to be given for civil servant women regarding frequency of meat consumption and other junk foods (high calorie food)

Abbreviations

AO=Abdominal obesity;BMI=Body mass index;CI=Confidence Interval;CHO=Carbohydrate; CVD=Cardio vascular disease;DDS=Dietary diversity Score;FVS=Food variety scores;HEI=Health eating index;NCD=None communicable diseases;GDP­=Gross domestic product;NHLBI=National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute;SPSS=Statistical Package for Social Science ;WC=Waist circumference;WHR=Waist hip ratio;WHO=World health organizationVAI=Visceral Adipose index;WHtR=Waist-to-height ratio

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate 

The study was carried out according to the guidelines and regulations laid down in the declaration of Helsinki. Before starting the data collection process, Kotebe Metropolitan University Menelik II Medical and Health Sciences College, Institutional Review Board (IRB) secured ethical clearance, the clear description of the study title, procedure and duration, possible risks and benefits of the study was explained for each study participants. In addition to this, letter of permission and ethical clearance was obtained from Addis Ababa Health Bureau prior to actual data collection.  

Then informed written and signed consent was taken from each study participants. Confidentiality of information was collected from each study participant was not disclosed. They were informed that they have full right to withdraw from the study at any time if they face any difficulties. The data was collected under covid-19 prevention protocols. 

Consent for publication 

Not applicable. 

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Competing interests 

The authors declared that no competing interests exist

Funding 

The research was not funded by any organization. 

Authors’ contributions

AW: Conceptualization and development of the proposal, data collectionand draft data analysis. SG: data analysis, editing, and develop the manuscript. GK: read and approved the final manuscript.  

Acknowledgments

The authors thank those who help us in providing data regarding civil servant women in each Woreda. Our gratitude goes to health professionals who contributed to this study by participating as supervisor and data collector as well as civil servant women of city government of Addis Ababa who participated in the study to their respective contribution to the study.

Authors’ information 

Author details1 Department of Nutrition Menelik II Medical and Health Sciences College, Kotebe Metropolitan University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Author details1,2:  Department of Public health, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia. Author details3:: Department of Public Health   Menelik II Medical and Health Sciences  College, Kotebe Metropolitan University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 

References

  1. Yang K, Li Y, Xue Y, Wang L, Liu X, Tu R, et al. Association of the frequency of spicy food intake and the risk of abdominal obesity in rural Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2019;9(11):e028736.
  2. Golpour-Hamedani S, Rafie N, Pourmasoumi M, Saneei P, Safavi SM. The association between dietary diversity score and general and abdominal obesity in Iranian children and adolescents. BMC Endocrine Disorders. 2020;20(1):1-8.
  3. Omar SM, Taha Z, Hassan AA, Al-Wutayd O, Adam I. Prevalence and factors associated with overweight and central obesity among adults in the Eastern Sudan. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0232624.
  4. Wang K, Wang D, Pan L, Yu Y, Dong F, Li L, et al. Prevalence of obesity and related factors among Bouyei and Han peoples in Guizhou Province, Southwest China. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129230.
  5. Yohannes M. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among office-based urban civil servants in southern nations, nationalities and peoples’ region, Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 2019;57:133-41.
  6. Cameron AJ, Magliano DJ, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Carstensen B, Alberti KGM, et al. The influence of hip circumference on the relationship between abdominal obesity and mortality. International journal of epidemiology. 2012;41(2):484-94.
  7. Nigatu YT, Reijneveld SA, de Jonge P, van Rossum E, Bültmann U. The combined effects of obesity, abdominal obesity and major depression/anxiety on health-related quality of life: the lifelines cohort study. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148871.
  8. Corona LP, da Silva Alexandre T, de Oliveira Duarte YA, Lebrão ML. Abdominal obesity as a risk factor for disability in Brazilian older adults. Public health nutrition. 2017;20(6):1046-53.
  9. Chew WF, Leong PP, Yap SF, Yasmin AM, Choo KB, Low GKK, et al. Risk factors associated with abdominal obesity in suburban adolescents from a Malaysian district. Singapore medical journal. 2018;59(2):104.
  10. Organization WH. Obesity and overweight: WHO; 2021 [20/4/2021]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.
  11. Baek Y, Park K, Lee S, Jang E. The prevalence of general and abdominal obesity according to sasang constitution in Korea. BMC complementary and alternative medicine. 2014;14(1):1-8.
  12. Martins-Silva T, Vaz JdS, Mola CLd, Assunção MCF, Tovo-Rodrigues L. Prevalence of obesity in rural and urban areas in Brazil: National Health Survey, 2013. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia. 2019;22:e190049.
  13. Darebo T, Mesfin A, Gebremedhin S. Prevalence and factors associated with overweight and obesity among adults in Hawassa city, southern Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. BMC obesity. 2019;6(1):1-10.
  14. Dagne S, Menber Y, Petrucka P, Wassihun Y. Prevalence and associated factors of abdominal obesity among the adult population in Woldia town, Northeast Ethiopia, 2020: Community-based cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0247960.
  15. Molla MD, Wolde HF, Atnafu A. Magnitude of Central Obesity and its Associated Factors Among Adults in Urban Areas of Northwest Ethiopia. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy. 2020;13:4169.
  16. Organization WH. Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2018. 2018.
  17. Csa I. Central statistical agency (CSA)[Ethiopia] and ICF. Ethiopia demographic and health survey, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA. 2016.
  18. Tesfaye TS, Zeleke TM, Alemu W, Argaw D, Bedane TK. Dietary diversity and physical activity as risk factors of abdominal obesity among adults in Dilla town, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236671.
  19. Janakiraman B, Abebe SM, Chala MB, Demissie SF. Epidemiology of general, central obesity and associated cardio-metabolic risks among University Employees, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity: targets and therapy. 2020;13:343.
  20. Mengesha MM, Ayele BH, Beyene AS, Roba HS. Clustering of Elevated Blood Pressure, Elevated Blood Glucose, and Abdominal Obesity Among Adults in Dire Dawa: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy. 2020;13:2013.
  21. Assessment FD. A resource guide to method selection and application in low resource settings. FAO: Rome, Italy. 2018:152.
  22. Krebs-Smith SM, Smiciklas-Wright H, Guthrie HA, Krebs-Smith J. The effects of variety in food choices on dietary quality. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1987;87(7):897-903.
  23. Organization WH. Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) analysis guide. Geneva; 2012.
  24. Organization WH. Waist circumference and waist-hip ratio: report of a WHO expert consultation, Geneva, 8-11 December 2008. 2011.
  25. Tran A, Gelaye B, Girma B, Lemma S, Berhane Y, Bekele T, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among working adults in Ethiopia. International journal of hypertension. 2011;2011.
  26. Pobee RA, Owusu W, Plahar W. The prevalence of obesity among female teachers of child-bearing age in Ghana. African journal of food, agriculture, nutrition and development. 2013;13(3).
  27. Ajani SR, Susan HJA, Oluwaseun A. Gender differences in factors associated with overweight and obesity among civil servants in Lagos, Nigeria. International Journal of Nutrition and metabolism. 2015;7(6):66-73.
  28. Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Components in a Population of Bank Employees from St. Petersburg, Russia. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders. 2011;9(5):337-43.
  29. El Kishawi RR, Soo KL, Abed YA, Muda WAMW. Prevalence and predictors of overweight and obesity among women in the Gaza strip-Palestine: a cross-sectional study. BMC public health. 2020;20(1):1-8.
  30. Mc Donald A, Bradshaw RA, Fontes F, Mendoza EA, Motta JA, Cumbrera A, et al. Prevalence of obesity in panama: some risk factors and associated diseases. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1075.
  31. Handayani M, Putri AN, Yani IE, Hasniyati R, Sidiq R. Central Obesity Incidence in Adult Women. International Journal Of Medical Science And Clinical Invention. 2020;7:5117-24.
  32. Mohammadi-Nasrabadi M, Sadeghi R, Rahimiforushani A, Mohammadi-Nasrabadi F, Shojaeizadeh D, Montazeri A. Socioeconomic determinants of excess weight and central obesity among Iranian women: Application of information, motivation, and behavioral skills model. Journal of education and health promotion. 2019;8.
  33. Olawuyi AT, Adeoye IA. The prevalence and associated factors of non-communicable disease risk factors among civil servants in Ibadan, Nigeria. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0203587.
  34. Lanas F, Bazzano L, Rubinstein A, Calandrelli M, Chen C-S, Elorriaga N, et al. Prevalence, distributions and determinants of obesity and central obesity in the Southern Cone of America. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0163727.
  35. Tzotzas T, Vlahavas G, Papadopoulou SK, Kapantais E, Kaklamanou D, Hassapidou M. Marital status and educational level associated to obesity in Greek adults: data from the National Epidemiological Survey. BMC public health. 2010;10(1):1-8.
  36. Aladeniyi I, Adeniyi OV, Fawole O, Adeolu M, Ter Goon D, Ajayi AI, et al. Pattern and correlates of obesity among public service workers in Ondo State, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. South African Family Practice. 2017;59(6):195-200.
  37. Janghorbani M, Amini M, Rezvanian H, GOUYA MM, DELAVARI AR, Alikhani S, et al. Association of body mass index and abdominal obesity with marital status in adults. 2008.
  38. You W, Henneberg M. Meat consumption providing a surplus energy in modern diet contributes to obesity prevalence: an ecological analysis. BMC Nutrition. 2016;2(1):1-11.
  39. Wang Y, Beydoun MA. Meat consumption is associated with obesity and central obesity among US adults. International journal of obesity. 2009;33(6):621-8.
  40. Hu C, Zhang M, Zhang X, Zhao Z, Huang Z, Li C, et al. Relationship between eating behavior and obesity among Chinese adults. Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi= Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi. 2020;41(8):1296-302.
  41. Yamamoto R, Tomi R, Shinzawa M, Yoshimura R, Ozaki S, Nakanishi K, et al. Associations of skipping breakfast, lunch, and dinner with weight gain and overweight/obesity in university students: a retrospective cohort study. Nutrients. 2021;13(1):271.
  42. Huang C, Hu H, Fan Y, Liao Y, Tsai P. Associations of breakfast skipping with obesity and health-related quality of life: evidence from a national survey in Taiwan. International journal of obesity. 2010;34(4):720-5.
  43. Farshchi H, Taylor M, Macdonald IA. Decreased thermic effect of food after an irregular compared with a regular meal pattern in healthy lean women. International Journal of Obesity. 2004;28(5):653-60.
  44. Bo S, De Carli L, Venco E, Fanzola I, Maiandi M, De Michieli F, et al. Impact of snacking pattern on overweight and obesity risk in a cohort of 11-to 13-year-old adolescents. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2014;59(4):465-71.
  45. Faghih S, Mohebpour R, Eskandari L. Assessment of the Correlation between BMI, Waist Circumference, and the Snacking Pattern and Dairy Consumption among Female Student Residents of Shiraz University Dormitories. Women’s Health Bulletin. 2014;1(1):1-4.
  46. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. The association of dietary behaviors and physical activity levels with general and central obesity among ASEAN university students. AIMS public health. 2017;4(3):301.
  47. Dagne S, Gelaw YA, Abebe Z, Wassie MM. Factors associated with overweight and obesity among adults in northeast Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity: targets and therapy. 2019;12:391.