FDC tumors are very rare neoplasms that mainly arise in lymph nodes while one-third of the cases develop in extranodal sites, which have a heterogeneous histology with storiform and fascicular arrangement of plump spindle cells[24]. The FDC tumors gained an increased attention since the first case of a tumor with follicular dendritic cell differentiation was reported by Monda et al. in 1986[25]. So far, there are less than 100 cases of follicular dendritic cell tumors which have been reported in English literature[12, 25]. The differential diagnosis include: Sarcoma, Hodgkin's Disease, Leiomyosarcoma, Gastro-Intestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) and Inflammatory Pseudo-Tumor[8, 26, 27]. According to Immuno-Histo-Chemical analyses, FDC Sarcoma shows spindle tumor cells arranging in fascicular or storiform patterns, which are immuno-reactive for one or more FDC markers: CD21 (C3d receptor, positive in 93% of cases) and CD35 (C3b receptor, positive in 89% of cases). Other quite specific markers used are: R4/23 (63%), Ki-67 (5%-50%), EMA (41%), Vimentin (61%), HLA-DR (57%), CD45 (21%) and S-100 protein (31%). The tumor cells typically lack expression of CD1a, CD 68, and Desmin[12, 14].
Primary Hepatic Sarcomas are very rare, representing less than 0.1% of all Primary Hepatic Tumors[7]. IPT-like FDC Sarcoma of the liver is an extremely uncommon tumor and only 20 cases have been reported till now in English literature, including the present patient[3, 4, 6–17] (summarized in Table 1). In 1996, Shek and colleagues reported the first case of Hepatic FDC Sarcoma[6]. The most common main complaint of the patients was upper abdominal pain and weight loss. Malaise, anemia and fever were also part of the initial presentation in some number of patients. In five cases, patients were completely asymptomatic and the mass was found incidentally using Contrast Tomography (CT) scan and abdominal ultrasound. The age of all the patients at initial presentation ranged from 19 to 82 years (mean 47.8 years), the mean tumor diameter was 11.9 cm (3–20 cm), and the mean reported survival was more than 30 months (follow-up ranging from 6 to 108 months). The histology is similar to that of the conventional FDC tumor and it is generally considered to be a distinctive variant which is characteristically restricted to the abdomen and seems to be a separate clinico-pathologic entity. Comparing to the conventional FDC Sarcoma, it has a marked female predominance (female to male ratio is 4:1), whereas conventional FDC Sarcomas are not more prevalent in only one sex[1]. IPT-like FDC Sarcomas have prominent inflammatory component, which makes it challenging to differentiate them from inflammatory pseudo-tumors. IPT-like FDC Sarcomas are strongly associated with the presence of EBV (85% in our review), which is rare for conventional FDC Sarcomas. Both IPT-like FDC Sarcomas and Conventional FDC Sarcomas generally show an indolent clinical behavior. Nevertheless, Conventional FDC Sarcomas of the liver can be more aggressive than IPT-like FDC ones, may recur or metastasize and even lead to death.
Table 1
Characteristics of patients with hepatic FDC sarcoma of the liver.
Case
|
Sex
|
Age
(year)
|
Main complaint
|
Diameter
(cm)
|
EBV
|
Treatment
|
Recurrence/
Survival
|
Published year
|
1
|
F
|
68
|
Malaise, weight loss, anemia
|
11
|
+
|
SR
|
No/>30m
|
1996[4]
|
2
|
F
|
35
|
Epigastric discomfort, fever,weight loss
|
20
|
+
|
SR
|
Yes/>30m
|
1996[6]
|
3
|
M
|
37
|
Malaise, weight loss, anemia
|
15
|
+
|
SR
|
No/>24m
|
1998[7]
|
4
|
F
|
19
|
Right upper quadrant pain, weight loss, palpable mass
|
12
|
+
|
SR
|
No/40m
|
2001[3]
|
5
|
F
|
56
|
Gastrointestinal discomfort
|
15
|
+
|
SR
|
Yes/NA
|
2001[3]
|
6
|
F
|
40
|
Epigastric pain, weight loss
|
12.5
|
+
|
SR
|
No/108m
|
2001[3]
|
7
|
F
|
49
|
Incidental at ultrasound
|
4.2
|
+
|
SR
|
No/9m
|
2001[3]
|
8
|
F
|
31
|
Abdominal distention, weight loss
|
15
|
+
|
SR
|
No/60m
|
2001[3]
|
9
|
F
|
57
|
Epigastric pain, weight loss
|
9.5
|
+
|
SR
|
No/36m
|
2001[8]
|
10
|
F
|
51
|
Epigastric pain, weight loss
|
12
|
+
|
SR
|
No/12m
|
2001[8]
|
11
|
M
|
82
|
Incidental on a CT abdomen
|
15
|
-
|
SR
|
No/18m
|
2005[10]
|
12
|
F
|
30
|
Incidental at ultrasound
|
5.5
|
+
|
SR
|
No/12m
|
2006[9]
|
13
|
F
|
57
|
Abdominal pain, vomiting, dizziness, liver dysfunction
|
13
|
+
|
SR
|
No/24m
|
2008[14]
|
14
|
F
|
78
|
Incidental at ultrasound
|
3
|
+
|
TACE
|
27m
|
2010[11]
|
15
|
F
|
59
|
Asymptomatic
|
6
|
+
|
SR
|
NA
|
2010[17]
|
16
|
F
|
53
|
Right upper quadrant pain, fever, anemia, jaundice
|
11.5
|
-
|
SR
|
No/6m
|
2011[12]
|
17
|
M
|
56
|
Right upper quadrant abdominal pain
|
11
|
NA
|
SR
|
No/12m
|
2011[16]
|
18
|
F
|
31
|
Palpable abdominal mass
|
20
|
+
|
SR
|
NA
|
2016[13]
|
19
|
M
|
19
|
Painless swellings around several joints
|
6
|
-
|
SR
|
NA
|
2016[15]
|
NA, not available; SR, surgical resection; TACE, Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization.
|
The initial diagnosis of FDCs is based on clinical examination, imaging and pathologic assessment. The role of imaging is mainly in describing the extent of the mass and staging. When a mass is suspected in the liver, the confirmatory diagnosis of IPT-like FDC Sarcoma is very difficult without pathological findings. It is noteworthy that the diagnosis of IPT-like FDC Sarcoma should be based on the recognition of FDCs from microscopic findings. Actually, the distinction of Hepatic IPT-like FDC Sarcoma from other liver tumors is usually impossible without immuno-histo-chemistry, due to features overlapping with other hepatic malignancies. Honestly, the patient was initial diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or Hepatic Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma according to his HBV infection’s history, MRI appearance and history of his surgery. Shek et al.[6] reported a case of primary IPT-FDC tumor of the liver that was initially misdiagnosed as an inflammatory pseudo-tumor. The tumor recurred 30 months after complete resection[6]. The definite diagnosis of IPT-like Sarcoma of the liver relies on histopathology. Furthermore, CD21 and CD35 have been widely used as the preferred FDC markers which were expressed in almost IPT-like FDCs. Moreover, EBV infection is identified as a key role in the genesis of IPT-like FDC Sarcoma. Almost all IPT-like FDC Sarcomas exhibited positive EBER by in situ hybridization (17/20 in Table 1)[10]. LMP-1 gene, the major oncogene of EBV was identified in several cases of IPT-like FDC Sarcomas[1, 4]. Positive staining of the FDC markers include CD21, CD35 and EBER, while negative expression in CD23, SMA, Desmin, ALK1 and S-100 are in the present case. However, the pathogenic mechanism of EBV in IPT-like FDC Sarcoma remains unclear and further investigation is required.
Primary NHL of the liver has rarely been reported and there are no typical laboratory or image diagnostic findings. Therefore, pathological analysis is the standard diagnostic method[28]. The occurrence of Hepatic NHL and Hepatic IPT-like FDC Sarcoma in the same person has never been previously reported. The patient we reported in this article received hepatic segmentectomy in our hospital due to Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-cell lymphoma) of the liver in 1999 (no data available due to longevity). Immuno-histochemical studies demonstrated that all the tumor cells were strongly positive stainings with CD20 and CD45. A diagnosis of hepatic NHL was rendered (Supplemental Figs. 1 and 2). Several studies indicated that chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection may be associated with the pathogenesis of NHL. However, the present case has HBV infection and no HCV infection. The detailed mechanism of HCV-mediated lymphomagenesis remains unclear[29]. Our search of the literature found no such cases. This is the first report to demonstrate hepatic IPT-like FDC Sarcoma in a patient with a history of Primary Hepatic NHL.
Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for Primary Hepatic IPT-like FDC Sarcomas and Hepatic NHL whenever possible. The efficacy of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unclear. Daniel et al.[30]reported that even if complete resection has been achieved for Hepatic NHL, postoperative chemotherapy is mandatory. The patient did not receive chemotherapy after the first hepatectomy. Tsunemine et al.[11]suggested that Trans-Arterial Chemo-Embolization (TACE) was useful for the management of Hepatic FDC Sarcoma and the patient was still alive 27 months after the diagnosis of Hepatic FDC Sarcoma, which was favorably controlled by repeated TACE. Shinagare et al.[16]reported a case whereby the patient was not determined to be a surgical candidate because of large tumor mass and small residual liver volume. The patient received four cycles of standard-dose of chemotherapy comprising of Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisone (CHOP) therapy and portal vein embolization in an attempt to cause hypertrophy of the residual liver which made him a surgical candidate. Seven months later, the patient underwent a successful resection of the 12-cm nodular mass[16]. In our review, nineteen of the patients (95%) with Hepatic IPT-FDC Sarcoma have undergone partial hepatectomy.
In conclusion, we report a unique case of hepatic IPT-like FDC Sarcoma with Hepatic Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma history. IPT-like FDC sarcoma is receiving growing attention and the diagnosis may be correct with the aid of immuno-histochemical analysis being CD 21 and CD35 the most reliable FDC markers. IPT-like FDC Sarcoma should be considered in differential diagnosis when confronted with a liver tumor in a patient with Primary Hepatic Lymphoma or HBV infection history. Complete resection remains the preferred method for the management of Primary Hepatic IPT-like FDCs. In analyzing the reported cases, we brought forth differential diagnosis and provided evidence for further exploration of the pathogenesis of the tumor. Continued accumulation of characteristics of IPT-like FDC Sarcomas of the liver would help in future patient care.