Oestrogen receptor signalling pathway screened from network pharmacology analysis
According to the retrieved results of the TCMSP database, the effective blood components of SWT were obtained, as shown in Fig. 2A. The active ingredients were filtered to identify the corresponding related targets. OMIM and GeneCards databases were used to select key targets related to “osteopenia”. Through the integration of the Venn diagram online tool, 63 drug-disease targets were obtained, including BCL-2 and BAX, as shown in Fig. 2B. The STRING database was used to obtain the protein interaction diagram, as shown in Fig. 3. GO analysis in FunRich was performed to further investigate the biological functions of 63 SWT-osteopenia targets. The results indicated that these targets primarily existed in cytosol, membrane raft, receptor complex and mitochondrial outer membrane and other regions of the cell and were involved in toxic substance, lipopolysaccharide, cellular response to lipid and other biological processes (Fig. 4A-B). Moreover, nuclear receptor activity, cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic signaling pathway, protein kinase activity and protein phosphatase binding are the principal molecular functions of SWT against osteopenia (Fig. 4C). To further reveal the potential mechanism of the anticancer effect of SWT on osteopenia, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis was conducted on the 63 targets by the ClusterProfiler package. According to the count value and p value, the first 20 channels were selected (Fig. 4D), of which the key pathways were pathway in cancer, Oestrogen signalling pathway, MAPK signalling pathway and regulation of lipolysis in adipocytes. In conclusion, the effect of SWT on osteopenia have a close association with cellular response to lipid, protein kinase and protein phosphatase binding on lipid metabolism and apoptosis, especially in the receptor complex and mitochondrial outer membrane. Combined with literature search, the results of GO and KEGG indicated that the relevant pathway to this study was the oestrogen receptor signalling pathway. To explore the multitarget pharmacological mechanism of the bone protection of SWT, we detected targets of the ER pathway, including ERα, ERβ, GPER, PI3K, AKT, P53, BCL-2 and BAX.
Observation of the pathological tissue morphology of mice
As shown in Fig. 5, the SWT group meliorated the pathological morphology of the bone tissue of the model mice. HE staining found that the trabecular bones of the control group were evenly distributed and arranged in an orderly manner, with small intervals between the trabecular bones. The trabecular bones of the model group were sparsely distributed, with scattered arrangements and broken points. Compared with the model group, the SWT group meliorated the distribution and arrangement of bone trabeculae in ApoE−/− mice fed a high-fat diet.
The protein expression of ERα, ERβ, GPER, PI3K, AKT, P53, BCL-2 and BAX in mice.
Western blot results showed that compared with the control group, the expression of classic oestrogen receptors, including ERα, ERβ and GPER, in the SWT group, as well as the expression of PI3K, AKT and BCL-2 proteins, were significantly increased, while the expression of apoptosis genes, including P53 and BAX, was significantly decreased (P < 0.01). Compared with the control group, the expression of GPER, PI3K, AKT and BCL-2 protein in the bone tissue of the model group was downregulated. P53, BAX, ERα and ERβ were upregulated. When Si-Wu-Tang exerts an oestrogen-like effect on bone tissue, the effect of regulating GPER is more obvious (Fig. 6).
The expression position and expression level of ERα, ERβ, GPER, PI3K, AKT, P53, BCL-2 and BAX in mice.
As shown in Fig. 7, the results of femoral immunohistochemistry show that the expression of each target in bone tissue is mainly located in bone cells and osteoblasts, so we zoomed in to observe the specific location of each target in the cell. Positive bone cells and osteoblasts stained brown–yellow particles. It can be seen from the Fig. 7 that P53, BAX and BCL-2 are mainly distributed in the cell cytoplasm; ERα and ERβ are distributed in the nucleus, and GPER is distributed on the cell membrane, and PI3K and AKT are both distributed on the cell membrane and nucleus. Compared with the model group, SWT increased the expression of ERα, ERβ, GPER, PI3K, AKT and BCL-2 in the femur and decreased the expression of P53 and BAX, which was approximately the same trend as the results of WB.
The mRNA expression of ERα, ERβ, GPER, PI3K, AKT, P53, BCL-2 and BAX in mice.
The RT–PCR results were showed in Fig. 8, compared with the control group, the mRNA expression of ERα, ERβ, P53 and BAX in the model group was relatively increased. The expression of GPER, PI3K, AKT and BCL-2 was significantly decreased (P < 0.01). Compared with the control group, the expression of ERα, ERβ, GPER, PI3K, AKT and BCL-2 in the SWT group increased significantly, and the expression of P53 and BAX decreased significantly. The expression levels of WB and mRNA were roughly the same. The results showed that when SWT exerted an effect on bone tissue, the regulation of different oestrogen receptors was different, and the regulatory effect on GPER was more obvious (Fig. 9).