The findings of this study further reiterate the endemicity of TB in both cattle and humans in Nigeria. The isolation of 65.4% M. bovis from slaughtered cattle in the study area corroborates earlier findings that indicated M. bovis as the primary agent of bTB in cattle. However, the prevalence reported in this study is lower than that of Ejeh(26) who identified 90% of the 40 isolates obtained from organs cultured as M. bovis. It is also lower than 99% M. bovis out of 180 isolates reported by other authors(12). Spoligotyping of the selected M. bovis isolates revealed the predominance of SB0944 in cattle in the study area. Spoligotypes SB0944 was also detected in camels a study in the same study area(27) This spoligotype pattern has been previously reported in cattle from Nigeria(15, 28), Chad, Cameroun(29), Mali(30), Morocco(31), France(32) and the United States(33). Again, the spoligotype SB1025 isolated in this study has been previously reported in Nigeria(12). As suggested(34), this spoligotype pattern could be generated from SB0944 through a single-step deletion of spacers(12) showing that spoligotypes evolve by the deletion of spacer units only. This further reiterates that SB0944 may represent the spoligotype pattern of the ancestral strain(12). Importantly, spoligotype patterns SB0944 and SB1025 belong to the African 1 (Af1) clonal complex characterized by the absence of spacer 30(35) which is also known to be widely distributed in West Africa.
Considering the zoonotic nature of M. bovis, spoligotype SB0944 had been previously isolated from infected sedentary and trade cattle in Ibadan(28) and from livestock traders at Akinyele Cattle Market in Ibadan(13). This indicates potential exposure of abattoir workers given prevailing factors that could enhance transmissions such as drinking of unpasteurized milk, processing infected carcasses with bare hands and unguarded close interactions with infected cattle.
Notably, the study also reported M. tuberculosis strains belonging to spoligotypes SIT 838 and 61 both of the international family LAM10_CAM. Earlier reports have identified LAM10_CAM in humans in Nigeria(14, 28, 36–38) and other countries in Africa including Cameroon(39), Burkina Faso(40), Sierra Leone(41), Niger and Ivory Coast and parts of Europe(32). Previous reports showed the LAM10-CAM family as the most predominant circulating clade in Nigeria(14, 36–38, 42, 43) The LAM10-CAM was first described in Cameroon, where it represented 34% of the M. tuberculosis isolates in 2003(39) and has recently emerged as a dominant strain in the western province of Cameroon. Importantly, a study demonstrated LAM 10 as part of spoligotype families including LAM 1 and Beijing families which had the highest sensitivities when compared with isolates belonging to other spoligotype families; suggesting their highly clonal and homogeneous nature(44).
Again, the study reveals two isolates with spoligotypes SIT 1054 and SIT 46 belonging to the Haarlem family. Other studies also reported this spoligotype family within and outside Nigeria(14, 44, 45). The Haarlem family is considered to belong to modern strains which are known to demonstrate more virulent phenotypes compared to the ancient ones such as the East African and Indian(46). Further, reports show that the Haarlem family, of European origin, comprises nearly a quarter of the M. tuberculosis population in Europe, and that it also accounts for a similar proportion of strains in the Caribbean and Central America(47, 48). The Haarlem family in these regions is believed to represent a remnant of the post-Columbian European colonization(48, 49) Besides, the Haarlem strains have been associated with multidrug resistance (MDR)-TB population, indicating its ability to cause outbreaks of MDR-TB, following reports from Argentina(50), the Czech Republic(51) and Tunisia(52). The association between drug resistance (DR) and the Haarlem family has also been observed in other studies including MDR-TB cases in Tehran, Iran(53), and DR-TB cases in Hungary(54); where the rates of infection by the Haarlem genotype were 33.5% and 66.2%, respectively(54, 55).
Limitations of the study were; the abattoir workers were not randomly sampled, sampling was done purposively based on the participants’ verbal consent after explaining to them the relevance of the study. Also, sputum samples collected from hospitals/clinics were based on those patients that were likely to be TB positive. This method of sampling may not be generalized, however, the sole purpose of the study was to generate the circulating spoligotypes in the area and the best population for such study is for those participants that were at high risk of being infected with the disease or those that were already indicating the clinical sign of infection. Few isolates were available for spoligotyping due to limited funds. Also, more detailed insights would have been provided if the majority of the isolates obtained were spoligotyped. Furthermore, characterization using such molecular techniques as Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Units-Variable Number Tandem Repeats was not done, as this would have given better epidemiological insights into the circulating strains. It is now common knowledge that spoligotyping has limitations as a tool for the prediction of the exact phylogenetic relationships between strains of the MTC, particularly among modern strains mainly due to homoplasy(47).
Despite these limitations, however, the study reveals SB0944 and SB1025 as the circulating M. bovis strains in cattle and LAM 10 and Haarlem families as the circulating M. tuberculosis strains among humans in Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria.