The morphology, composition and thermal properties of PDA- rGO
SEM and TEM images of the the surface morphology and microstructure of GO and PDA-rGO are presented in Fig. 3. GO has quite a multilayer sheet-like structure with a smooth surface and wrinkled edges, as shown in Fig. 3 (a) and (a'). However, the surface of PDA-rGO is covered with a thin film and the roughness of its surface is significantly increased after modification as presented in Fig. 3 (b) and (b'). This is the in-situ polymerization of DA on the surface of GO under alkaline environment, resulting in the formation of a uniformly wrapped PDA layer on the surface of GO [26]. It can also be seen that the PDA only wraps around the GO surface and does not change the multilayer sheet-like structure of GO.
Figure 4 shows the FTIR spectra of GO, rGO and PDA-rGO. The C = O stretching vibration peak at 1725cm− 1, the C-O stretching vibration peak of the hydroxyl group at 1056 cm− 1, the C = C vibration peak of the aromatic ring at 1625 cm− 1, and the stretching vibration peak of hydroxyl group O-H at 3420cm− 1 are the characteristic peaks of GO [19, 25, 27]. The C = O stretching vibration peaks of rGO and PDA-rGO at 1725 cm− 1 decreased greatly, indicating that the carboxyl groups were mainly involved in the self-polymerization of dopamine onto the surface of GO. The newly generated peak at 1577 cm− 1 is attributed to the N-H vibrational of PDA-rGO. The peaks of 2926 cm− 1 and 2853 cm− 1 can be ascribed to the symmetric stretching vibration and asymmetric stretching vibration of -CH2 in the molecular of PDA, respectively [22]. It can be confirmed that PDA wase effectively coated onto the surface of GO through self-polymerization.
The structures of GO, rGO and PDA-rGO were further investigated using Raman spectra. As shown in Fig. 5, all samples revealed two distinct absorption peaks around 1350cm− 1 and 1580cm− 1, namely the D band peak formed by the vibration of SP3 carbon atoms and the G band peak generated from the sp2 carbon atoms [27–28]. In most cases, the intensity ratio of the peaks (ID/IG, D band to G band) may be utilized to determine the degree of defects in the graphene structure [19, 29]. The ID/IG ratio of PDA-rGO was raised to 1.12 as compared to that of GO of 0.89. It demonstrated that PDA grafted on the surface of GO through the covalent bond and thus its intensity ratio was higher than that of GO [27].
The dispersion of carbon nanomaterials in aqueous solution can be investigated by sedimentation experiments. Figure 6 showed the optical photos of 1 mg/ml GO, rGO, and PDA-rGO after standing in aqueous solution for 72h. GO exhibited good hydrophilicity due to the abundant oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface, so it can be uniformly dispersed in aqueous solution for a long time. The rGO produced a sedimentation phenomenon in the solution, while the PDA-rGO could still be stably dispersed in the aqueous solution because of the hydrophilic functional groups such as hydroxyl groups on its surface. In addition, the color of the aqueous solution in the Fig. 6 changed from brown to black, which was attributed to the removal of oxygen-containing functional groups and the recovery of aromatic ring π-π bonds [26]. It was further confirmed that graphene oxide was reduced by ascorbic acid and PDA.
Figure 7 presents the TGA plots of GO, rGO and PDA-rGO. The weight loss of GO are substantially greater than that of rGO and PDA-rGO below 120 ℃, owing to the water and oxygen-containing groups on the surface of GO[30–31]. A major loss platform appears at around 200°C ~ 350°C, and the weight loss rate of rGO and PDA-rGO is far less than that of GO. This result was attributed to the restore of the carbon skeleton structure of rGO and PDA-rGO resulting in the improved thermal stability [19]. The weight loss of GO, rGO and PDA-rGO is 59.6%, 15.2% and 40.2%, respectively, when the temperature reaches 600℃. After GO was modified by PDA through covalent bond, the organic groups on the surface of PDA-rGO affected its thermal stability. In comparison with GO, the thermal stability of PDA-rGO was still effectively improved because the oxygen-containing functional groups on its surface are almost removed as a result of modification and reduction by PDA [22, 26].
The Morphology of composite fibers
Figure 8 depicts the surface and cross-section morphology of the pure PA6 fiber and composite fibers. The surface of the pure PA6 fiber is relatively smooth and fiber diameter is quite uniform with an average value of 20 µm. The surface roughness of the composite fiber increases with the addition of PDA- rGO (Fig. 8c), but the surface remains smooth and free of cracks and defects, demonstrating that the PDA-rGO / PA6 composite fiber can be spun and hot drawn continuously. The cross-sectional morphologies of the pure PA6 fiber and the 0.15wt%rGO/PA6 composite fibers are shown in Fig. 8 (a) and (b), respectively. It can be seen from Fig. 8 (b) that the unmodified rGO aggregates obviously in PA6 matrix because of the poor compatibility. PDA-rGO, on the other hand, is nicely embedded and uniformly dispersed in the PA6 matrix as shown in Fig. 8(d). Furthermore, neither holes or cracks are observed in the cross-section of the composite fiber, implying that the PDA-rGO and PA6 matrix has a robust interface interaction [32–33].
The mechanical properties of composite fibers
The mechanical characteristics of the pure PA6 fiber, the PA6 composite fiber with 0.15% unmodified rGO, and PDA-rGO/PA6 composite fibers with 0.05wt%, 0.15wt% ,0.3wt% PDA-rGO loading content are exhibited in Fig. 9 and Table 1. The tensile strength and Young's modulus (E) of 0.15wt% rGO/PA6 composite fiber increases slightly compared with that of pure PA6 fiber. The mechanical performance of the composite fiber is found to be significantly improved once PDA-rGO is added. The tensile strength and Young's modulus of the PDA-rGO/PA6 composite fiber reaches a maximum value at 310.4 MPa and 462.3MPa, respectively, when the PDA-rGO loading content is raised to 0.15wt%. However, as the loading content further increase, the composite fiber's tensile strength and Young's modulus begin to decline owing to the excessive addition of PDA-rGO, which resulted in the production of flaws and weak joints on the composite fiber [32]. Comparing PDA-rGO/PA6 and rGO/PA6 composite fibers, it is found that the mechanical strength of PDA-rGO/PA6 composite fiber increased by 45% over rGO/PA6 composite fiber when the content is the same at 0.15wt%.
Table 1
Tensile properties of PA6 fiber,0.15rGO/PA6 composite fiber and composite fibers containing different PDA-rGO content.
Loading content (wt%)
|
Tensile Strength (MPa)
|
Elongation at break (%)
|
Young's modulus (MPa)
|
0
|
204.3
|
75.2
|
386.4
|
0.05 PDA-rGO
|
247.8
|
67.3
|
412.3
|
0.15 PDA-rGO
|
310.4
|
58.4
|
462.3
|
0.3 PDA-rGO
|
229.1
|
54.1
|
405.8
|
0.15 rGO
|
213.5
|
46.5
|
394.6
|
The Halpin-Tsai model is one of the widely used polymer reinforcement mechanism models [19, 34, 35]. Herein, it is conducted to explore the reinforcement mechanism of PDA-rGO/PA6 composite fibers. In general, PDA-rGO may present ether an oriented or a random distribution state in the composite fibers. The theoretical Young's modulus of the composite fibers is calculated by the following modified Halpin-Tsai equations:
$${E}_{r}\left(random\right)={E}_{N}·\left[\frac{3}{8}\left(\frac{1+{\eta }_{L}·\xi ·{\nu }_{G}}{1-{\eta }_{L}·{\upsilon }_{G}}\right)+\frac{5}{8}\left(\frac{1+2{\eta }_{T}·{\upsilon }_{G}}{1-{\eta }_{T}·{\nu }_{G}}\right)\right] \left(1\right)$$
$${E}_{P}\left(parallel\right)={E}_{N}·\left(\frac{1+{\eta }_{L}·\xi ·{\upsilon }_{G}}{1-{\eta }_{L}·{\upsilon }_{G}}\right) \left(2\right)$$
$${\eta }_{L}=\frac{{E}_{G}/{E}_{N}-1}{{E}_{G}/{E}_{N}+\xi } \left(3\right)$$
$${\eta }_{G}=\frac{{E}_{G}/{E}_{N}-1}{{E}_{G}/{E}_{N}+2} \left(4\right)$$
$$\xi =\frac{l+\omega }{d} \left(5\right)$$
Where Er and Ep denote Young's modulus of PDA-rGO/PA6 composite fibers with random and parallel oriented PDA-rGO nanosheets. EN represents the Young's modulus of pure PA6 fiber (386.4 MPa), while EG refers to the modulus of PDA-rGO (250 GPa) [19, 34]; In this model, the modified graphene nanosheets are regarded as strip solid fibers, with l, ω, and d representing the length, width and thickness of PDA-rGO (l = 3µm, ω = d 2µm, d = 2.4nm), respectively[35]. The mass fraction of PDA-rGO used in experimental section is converted into volume fraction VG (%) from the following equations:
$${V}_{G}\left(\%\right)=\frac{{W}_{G}/{\rho }_{G}}{{W}_{G}/{\rho }_{G}+\left(1-{W}_{G}\right)/{\rho }_{N}} \left(6\right)$$
Where WG is the mass fraction of PDA-rGO in the PA 6 matrix, ρG(1.8g/cm3) and ρN (1.13g/cm3) denote the density of PDA-rGO and pure PA6 fiber, respectively [19, 35].
Figure 10 shows the experimental modulus and the Halpin-Tsai theoretical modulus of PDA-rGO/PA6 composite fiber. When the volume fraction of PDA-rGO is less than 0.1%, the experimentally measured Young's modulus data is pretty much close to theoretical calculated value by the random distribution model of PDA-rGO in PA6 matrix, and they both show an upward trend with the increase of filler content. This indicates on the one hand that PDA-rGO is randomly distributed in the matrix, and on the other hand that at low contents, the experimental and theoretical values basically coincide because PDA-rGO can be uniformly dispersed in the matrix without causing stress concentration due to agglomeration in the matrix. Similar findings were reported by Liu Haihui, Jia Hongbing, etc[19, 35, 38]. When the volume fraction of PDA-rGO exceeds 0.09%, however, the experimental modulus deviates from the value of theoretical model and shows a downward trend. This is primarily due to the agglomerates of PDA-rGO in the matrix, which may introduce defects and thus become a mechanical weak point.
At this point, we can rule out the contribution of PDA-rGO orientation to the mechanical properties, and the reason directed at the non-orientation is probably related to the fact that the tensile stress field applied by our processing equipment is not that strong. The following aspects are accountable for the substantial improvement in the mechanical properties : (i) The PDA modified graphene nanosheets can be uniformly dispersed in the PA6 matrix, which not only greatly avoids the stress concentration caused by agglomeration, but also brings out the laminar fold structure of rGO as much as possible, playing a much better role in stress dispersion and transfer [37]; (ii) there is a good interfacial compatibility and strong interfacial bonding between the PDA-rGO and PA6 matrix, which on the one hand can prevent the slip of the matrix molecular chain on the PDA-rGO surface, and can also make the stress effectively transferred to the PDA-rGO; (iii) The molecules onto the surface of PDA-rGO and the PA6 macromolecular chain formed a three-dimensional network structure through hydrogen bond interactions chain and entanglement during during melt mixing and spinning, which restricted the movement of the macromolecular chains and thus it also explained the gradual decrease in the elongation at break of the composite fibers [11, 32].
The thermal properties of composite fibers
The crystallization behavior of PA6 fiber and composite fibers can be measured by DSC. Here, Tm (the melting temperature) and Tc (the crystallization temperature) were tested as the peak points. \(\text{X}\text{c}\)(crystallinity) was measured by the following formula:
$${X}_{c}=\frac{{\Delta }{\text{H}}_{f}}{\left(1-\alpha \right){\Delta }{\text{H}}_{{f}^{*}}} \times 100\% \left(7\right)$$
where α represents the proportion of PDA-rGO filler in the PA6 matrix, ΔHf refers to the melting enthalpy of the prepared composite fibers, and ΔHf* is the melting enthalpy of 100% crystallization of PA6 corresponding to190 J/g.
Tm of the PDA-rRG/PA6 composite fibers does not change much with the incorporation of PDA-rGO, as shown in Fig. 11 and Table 2, while Tc moves toward higher temperature. In addition, the crystallinity increases slightly up to 33.4% when the PDA-rGO content is 0.15%. Because of its homogeneous dispersion in the PA6 matrix, PDA-rGO may act as a heterogeneous nucleating agent, promoting crystallization of PA6 [36]. The crystallinity of the composite fibers starts to decline inversely after the addition of 0.3% PDA-rGO. his is due to the reduced nucleation efficiency since that the excess graphene nanosheets may agglomerate and accumulate in PA6. As can be observed, the effect of PDA-rGO on the crystallization behavior of the composite fibers is not significant. This may be due to the thermal stretching field experienced in the fiber preparation, where the stresses ordered the PA6 molecular chains and promoted the crystallization, thus the effect of PDA-rGO on the crystallization of the matrix is weakened and not to be manifested [37]. It also suggests that crystallinity should have little to do with the above mechanical properties.
Table 2
DSC data of PA6 fiber and composite fibers containing different PDA-rGO content
Loading content (wt%)
|
Tm
(℃)
|
ΔHf
(J/g)
|
Tc
(℃)
|
Xc
(%)
|
0
|
223.84
|
57.1
|
187.2
|
30.1
|
0.05 PDA-rGO
|
223.73
|
60.4
|
187.8
|
31.8
|
0.15 PDA-rGO
|
223.11
|
63.4
|
189.2
|
33.4
|
0.3 PDA-rGO
|
223.69
|
59.2
|
189.5
|
31.2
|
The TGA results of pure PA6 and composite fibers are shown in Fig. 12, meanwhile, the specific data of T5 (the decomposition temperature at 5% weight loss) and Tmax (the decomposition temperature at maximum weight loss) are listed in Table 3. Compared with pure PA6 fiber, T5 of the composite fiber increases by 13℃ to 364.3℃ when the PDA-rGO loading content is 0.15wt%, and the Tmax decomposition occurs at 445.7℃. The addition of PDA-rGO significantly improves the thermal stability of composite fibers. The improved thermal stability of the composite fiber is assisted by the uniform dispersion of modified graphite nanosheets in the matrix, which can form a three-dimensional network structure that will restrict the molecular movement of PA6 matrix as well as a certain physical barrier effect suppresses the thermal decomposition of the composite fibers [32, 39].
Table 3
TGA data of PA6 fiber and composite fibers containing different PDA-rGO content
Loading content(wt%)
|
T5(℃)
|
Tmax (℃)
|
0
|
351.3
|
440.5
|
0.05 PDA-rGO
|
355.8
|
443.8
|
0.15 PDA-rGO
|
364.3
|
445.7
|
0.3 PDA-rGO
|
363.9
|
442.1
|