Chemical composition of bean leaves. According to other authors, quelites like bean leaves (BL), contribute significantly to nutrients supply, which is comparable to commonly consumed vegetable leaves supply [9]. All the analyses were calculated using dry matter basis (Table S2) of Flor de Mayo Eugenia variety (FME) containing 25.7% of protein, 25.9% of dietary fiber, 29.33% of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and 16.7% of acid detergent fiber (ACD). The amount of protein was similar to the observed in BL of Pinto Villa variety (PV) [7] and higher than different varieties of bean seeds [10]. Dietary fiber is conformed by the total amount of soluble and insoluble fiber. FME bean leaves had higher insoluble fiber (NDF and ADF) than soluble fiber (Table S2), in accordance with previous reports [11, 12]. About total phenolic content, FME bean leaves had 2.9 mg gallic acid equivalent (Table S2). PV leaves contain twice the amount of total phenolic compounds [7], meanwhile, black and speckled bean seeds reports showed similar amount of total phenolic compounds [11, 15]. In a previous study, total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity increased 53% and 31% respectively, in HFFD with 10% of BL [8]. A low sugar diet with high content of protein, dietary fiber and polyphenols has been related to a lower risk of non-communicable chronic diseases development, such as dyslipidemia, diabetes, and obesity [14, 15].
Effect of bean leaves in anthropometric parameters. Body weight was recorded weekly. Since week two (Fig. 1), rats in group H showed 8% higher weight than rats in groups S and HBL. Also, group H presented increments of 15% on weight gain, 11% on abdominal circumference (AC) and 7% on abdominal/thoracic circumferences index (AC/TC) compare other diets (Table 1). Rise in AC and AC/TC index has been related to visceral adipose tissue accumulation and pro-inflammatory illness as metabolic diseases [16]. Even several similar studies exhibited increment in weight gain, abdominal fat deposition (AC and AC/TC index) and BMI (body mass index) [2]. In this study, differences between groups were not observed in body length, TC and BMI. Also, it has been reported that higher fiber and polyphenols intake is associated with less weight gain and less abdominal fat deposition (Table 1) [1].
Table 1
Effect of bean leaves in anthropometric parameters
|
S
|
SBL
|
H
|
HBL
|
Weight gain (g)
|
203.2 ± 25.8
|
193.0 ± 34.6
|
232.7 ± 30.3*
|
204.0 ± 41.8
|
Body length (cm)
|
24.4 ± 2.7
|
24.1 ± 1.6
|
24.0 ± 1.9
|
24.0 ± 2.0
|
Abdominal circumference (cm)
|
20.8 ± 2.1
|
20.3 ± 1.9
|
23.0 ± 2.0*
|
20.9 ± 2.2
|
Thoracic circumference (cm)
|
17.7 ± 1.6
|
17.3 ± 1.4
|
18.3 ± 1.5
|
17.6 ± 1.7
|
AC/TC index
|
1.18 ± 0.1
|
1.18 ± 0.1
|
1.26 ± 0.1*
|
1.19 ± 0.1
|
BMI (g/cm2)
|
0.70 ± 0.2
|
0.68 ± 0.1
|
0.75 ± 0.1
|
0.71 ± 0.1
|
Values represent mean ± SD (n = 9). ANOVA post hoc Duncan was performed, significant difference p ≤ 0.05 *H against S, SBL and HBL. S = standard diet, SBL = S + 10% bean leaves, H = high fat-high fructose diet, HBL = H + 10% bean leaves, AC = abdominal circumference, TC = thoracic circumference, BMI = body mass index, Weight gain = final weight-initial weight. |
Food, water and energy intake. There was no significant difference in daily food and energy intake between groups (Table 2), the latter in accordance with the previous report [8]. However, group S water intake was higher than H and HBL, without differences on urine excretion (Table 2). As it was observed in other studies HFFD reduce water intake, perhaps due to the effect of fat on satiety or the absence of a sweet taste in the water [1, 2]. It should be remarked that groups with BL (SBL and HBL) showed a lower energy density intake compared to their control diets (Table 2). Energy density represents the caloric content of food. Fats have a high energy density, low capacity of satiety, and great flavor, favoring the intake of greater energy [17].
Table 2
Food, energy and water intake and their effect on urine excretion
|
S
|
SBL
|
H
|
HBL
|
Energy density (kcal*g/ml)
|
2.29 ± 0.04
|
2.27 ± 0.03
|
2.76 ± 0.04 *
|
2.67 ± 0.05 *#
|
Food intake (g/day)
|
26.6 ± 4.7
|
25.7 ± 5.6
|
24.1 ± 8.4
|
20.7 ± 8.3
|
Energy intake (kcal/day)
|
87.4 ± 15.6
|
87.3 ± 19.2
|
106.2 ± 37.1
|
91.2 ± 36.6
|
Feed efficiency (%)
|
16.3 ± 5.9
|
16.8 ± 7.6
|
23.9 ± 15.6
|
22.1 ± 10.8
|
Water intake (ml/day)
|
49.0 ± 7.5
|
50.3 ± 5.9
|
39.8 ± 6.9*
|
42.1 ± 6.9*
|
Urine excretion (ml/day)
|
17.7 ± 10.4
|
17.9 ± 3.2
|
16.5 ± 6.3
|
18.1 ± 7.0
|
Values represent mean ± SD (n = 9). ANOVA and Duncan post hoc were performed, significant difference p ≤ 0.05 *H against S and SBL, #H against HBL. S = standard diet, SBL = S + 10% bean leaves, H = high-fat/high-fructose diet, HBL = H + 10% bean leaves, feed efficiency (%) = Weight gain/food intake×100. Urine excretion ml/day (n = 6). |
Effect of bean leaves on glucose and lipid parameters. Rats fed with HFFD (H and HBL) exhibited increments in total cholesterol and triglycerides (Table 3) compared to those with standard diet (S and SBL). SBL decreased triglycerides levels and its hepatic accumulation (Table 3). This effect on serum and hepatic triglycerides has been shown earlier by supplementing with 10% of BL in a HFFD with 7h RFP [18]. Supplementation with bean leaves (HBL) increased very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-c) levels, compared to S and H. Similar changes were previously associated with improvement in liver triglycerides exportation in liver [19]. Although HFFD models have shown alterations in lipid and glucose metabolism [20], no significant differences were found in fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, LDL-c, HDL-c and hepatic triglycerides between groups S and H (Table 3).
Table 3
Effect of bean leaves in biochemical parameters
|
S
|
SBL
|
H
|
HBL
|
Total cholesterol (mg/dl)
|
62.2 ± 7.3
|
59.8 ± 7.9
|
76.1 ± 9.6#
|
74.4 ± 7.2#
|
Triglycerides (mg/dl)
|
102.3 ± 16.2
|
76.2 ± 12.9*
|
132.8 ± 41.8$
|
139.9 ± 28.4$
|
VLDL-c (mg/dl)
|
21.9 ± 2.6
|
14.4 ± 6.5$
|
17.8 ± 8.5
|
26.5 ± 5.7*
|
LDL-c (mg/dl)
|
7.3 ± 1.3
|
7.5 ± 1.3
|
7.2 ± 5.9
|
7.9 ± 2.6
|
HDL-c (mg/dl)
|
44.5 ± 1.9
|
41.2 ± 4.7
|
47.1 ± 5.5$
|
47.4 ± 2.9$
|
Glucose (mg/dl)
|
92.8 ± 20.1
|
88.2 ± 15.6
|
107.4 ± 44.0
|
104.7 ± 33.3
|
Insulin (mUI/ml)
|
11.5 ± 4.6
|
25.8 ± 4.9*
|
11.1 ± 6.9
|
12.0 ± 8.8
|
HOMA-IR
|
2.5 ± 0.9
|
4.9 ± 1.2*
|
3.3 ± 2.7
|
2.8 ± 2.0
|
Hepatic triglycerides
|
139.8 ± 71.8
|
81.1 ± 56.0*
|
155.0 ± 44.1
|
189.1 ± 71.7
|
Values represent mean ± SD (n = 6). ANOVA and Duncan analysis were performed, significant difference p ≤ 0.05 $against S, H and HBL, #against S and SBL. S = standard diet, SBL = S + 10% bean leaves, H = high-fat/high-fructose diet, HBL = H + 10% bean leaves, VLDL-C = very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment. Hepatic triglycerides mg/ 100 mg of tissue (n = 4). |
Glycemic response after glucose intraperitoneal administration (2 g/ kg of weight) is shown in Fig. 2. At 30, 60, 90,120 minutes, H and HBL groups presented raised glucose levels against S group (Fig. 2A). It is known that alterations in area under the curve (AUC) is an abnormal response to postprandial glycemic, an early beginning of insulin resistance [21]. In the global response, glucose AUC (Fig. 2B), group H exhibited higher AUC values than groups S and HBL. These results, together with weight gain and abdominal circumference increment, supported early metabolic alterations development. Data suggested that even when HFFD could propitiate alterations in lipid and glucose metabolism, the supplementation of bean leaves improved the response of postprandial glycaemia [14]. Observations could be related to the fiber (Table S2) and polyphenols content in diets bean leaves supplemented diets as shown by the increase in 53% respect to group H, previously reported [8].
Effect of bean leaves on fecal excretion, fat and triglycerides. The animals fed with SBL excreted 29% more feces than group S; without differences between groups H and HBL (Fig. 3A). Insoluble fiber intake promotes the fecal excretion by mechanical stimulation and lower absorption of nutrients [22]. The increase on fecal excretion could be related to a higher fiber content (Table S1) and greater water intake (Table 2). Meanwhile, fecal triglycerides (Fig. 3B) in total fecal fat showed no difference between groups S and SBL, related to a high content of fat in diet. Groups H and HBL present higher levels of fecal triglycerides than group S. This data suggested that the ameliorated effect of bean leaves supplementation in early metabolic alterations, such as less weight gain and abdominal fat accumulation, may not have an effect in fat absorption decrease.
Effect of bean leaves on short chain fatty acids analysis (SCFA) in colon luminal content. Finally, the production of SCFA (acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, butyrate, isovalerate, valeric and isocaproic) was determined in the colon luminal content (Fig. 3). In general, rats in group S present higher levels of total SCFA than group H. Furthermore, BL supplementary diet boosted the concentration of SCFA (Fig. 3C) in SBL in 42% higher than S, while HBL raised to 54% higher than H. Also, acetate, propionate and butyrate concentrations (Fig. 3D-F) increased with BL supplementation (SBL and HBL). It is well-known that HFFD decreases SCFA production [23], while fiber and polyphenols from plant-based food increases its concentration[3] by increasing bacteria quantity and variety [24]. The protective effect of BL supplementation on weight gain, postprandial glycaemia response, and visceral adiposity, could be related to increases in SFCA (Fig. 3C). SCFA, especially acetate, are agonist of free fatty acid receptors (FFA2 and FFA3) expressed in β pancreatic cells [25], that could explain serum insulin increases in SBL (Table 3). Additionally, publications have reported butyrate as anti-inflammatory and main source of energy for colonocytes, propionate and acetate promote satiety by PYY (peptide YY) and GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide 1) [3, 26].