3.1 Phytochemical test of P. hornemannii
In the study, it was found that there are a variety of phytochemicals present in the methanol extract of P. hornemannii. These include protein, carbohydrate, alkaloids, phenol, saponin, flavonoids, steroids, and tannin and terpenoids are absent. In chloroform extract of P. hornemannii, the protein, carbohydrates, phenol, flavonoids, and terpenoids have been reported to be present while the alkaloids, saponin, tannin, flavonoids, and steroids are absent. The MEPH showed the most promising results in comparison with the chloroform extract (Table 1). Finally, the MEPH is used for further tests.
Table 1
Phytochemical analysis of P. hornemannii
Phytochemical test
|
Methanol extract
|
Chloroform
|
Protein
Carbohydrate
Alkaloids
Phenol
Saponin
Tannin
Flavonoids
Steroids
Terpenoids
|
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
|
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
-
+
|
3.2. Yield, TPC and TFC
An overall yield of 8.6% was found for the MEPH. The TPC of the methanol extract of the P. hornemannii was 1.06 ± 0.13 mg.GAE/g, as well as the total flavonoids were 1.303 ± 0.3 mg.GAE/g. Flavonoids were known to contain more bioactive compounds than phenols in the MEPH. The methanol extracts of red seaweed Gracilaria edulis Euchema kappaphycus and Acanthophora spicifera, yielded, respectively, 2.85, 3.98 and 5.01% of yields, according to Ganesan et al. (2008). In addition, similar results were observed in the methanol extracts from several brown seaweed species, as well, such as Sargassum marginatum (5.45%), Turbinaria conoides (5.76%) and Padina tetrastomatica (12.31%) (Chandini et al. 2008).
During the study conducted by De Quiros et al. (2010), there was a measurement of the TPC found in the CH3OH and CHCl3 extracts of L. snyderiae (3.6 ± 0.12 and 3.2 ± 0.41 µg.GAE/mg), respectively. A study carried out by Souza et al. (2011) found that the highest average concentration of TPC was found in an ethanol extract of G. birdiae (1.13 mg.GAE/g). It was previously reported that the TPC of Fucus spiralis could be as high as 1.15 ± 0.06 mmol GAE/g dry weight, which is equivalent to 195.6 ± mg.GAE/g extract (Peinado et al. 2014). In light of the previous studies and evidence, it appears that the natural phenolic grouped compounds in flavonoids show anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive, antioxidative, and antiproliferative properties (Sangeetha et al. 2016) (Mahendran et al. 2021) (Maheswari et al. 2021). Furthermore, flavonoids are also capable of protecting people from the negative side effects of coronary heart disease (Xiao et al. 2011). Despite this, it has been reported that the amount of flavonoids in Cystoseira barbara ranges between 5 mg and 8 mg GAE/g extract (Haddar et al. 2012). Further, there have been reports of flavonoids being potent antioxidants, inhibitors of lipid peroxidation, and antioxidants against a wide range of reactive oxygen species. Therefore, flavonoids have been investigated as impending therapeutic proxies against any number of diseases. Various evidence has been presented to suggest that phytoconstituents occur in a variety of foods, like flavonoids, tannins, and polyphenols, and that these ingredients help to mitigate many diseases due to their free radical scavenging properties (Duan et al. 2006).
3.3 FTIR spectrum of P. hornemannii
The functional group predictions were carried out based on IR chart interpretation, the spectrum of P. hornemannii was observed to have ten distinct peaks. There are various functional groups present in P. hornemannii, such as Alkyl halides with C-Br stretch and alcohol with C-O stretch, Ether with C = O stretch, Alkane with C-H bending and C = C stretch, alkyne with C-C stretch, Alkene with C-H stretch and Amine with N-H stretches (Fig. 1). There were similar results reported from the FT-IR spectrum of Turbinaria ornata with the peaks ranging from 1026.16, 3414.12, 1028.09, and 3394.83 cm− 1 respectively (Vijayabaskar and Shiyamala 2012). According to the spectra of T. ornata, the absorption peaks around 3300–3500 cm− 1 for hydroxyl groups and 2850–2960 cm− 1 for aromatic rings were characterized by phenolic compounds. In contrast, the present results demonstrated a higher amount of flavonoids.
3.4 GC-MS analysis of MEPH
The results of GC-MS analysis of MEPH revealed 20 compounds at a running time of 4.15 mins. The chromatogram of each signal was compared with the NIST library to confirm the presence of 20 different bioactive compounds. The MEPH showed 7 major compounds. Their respective peak area (%) and bio-potentials include n-hexadecanoic acid comprised 41.88% and possess antioxidant, nematicide, pesticide, lubricant, antipsychotic and antiandrogenic (Ragunathan et al., 2019). The second major compound, 9, 12-octadecadienoic acid (Z, Z) occupies 19.49% of antimicrobial activity (Abubakar and Majinda 2016). Followed by Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1- (hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester (4.51%), 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z), 2-hydroxy-1- (hydroxymethyl)ethyl (4.28%), 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)- 2-hydroxy-1- (hydroxymethyl) ethyl (3.62%), Oleic Acid (3.47%) and Hexadecanoic acid, 1- (hydroxymethyl)-1,2- ethanediol ester (3.13%) were observed as well as the minor versatile common compounds are presented in P. hornemannii and they are playing in many antibacterial activities. The results are shown in Fig. 2 and Table 2. Manilal et al. (2010) have supported some similar compounds observed from the red algae Asparagopsis taxiformis which include 9-octadecanoic acid, methyl ester; octadecanoic acid and octadec-9-enoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy-propyl ester might possess various bioactivity. In support of the present findings another study by Deepak et al. (2019) reported 7 compounds from Halymenia palmata which include 2-Propanamine, Phytol, Hexadecanoic acid methyl ester, Ether, (2-ethyl-1-cyclodecen-1-yl) methyl methyl, 5-Isopropyl-6-methylhepta- 3, 5-dien-2-ol, Citronellol epoxide (Ror S) and 3-Tetradecene. Thus, the earlier reports directed some possible biological potential lies in the present seaweed P. hornemannii. Presently, with these hints, some biological properties have been evaluated.
Table 2
GC-MS analysis in methanol extract of P.hornemannii
S.No
|
Compound Name
|
R.time
|
Formula
|
Molecular weight
|
Area %
|
1
|
1-Cyclohexene-1- carboxaldehyde, 4-(1- methylethenyl)-
|
7.782
|
C10H14O
|
150.21
|
0.65
|
2
|
Cyclohexanone, 2-(2- nitro-2-propenyl)-
|
8.463
|
C15H17NO3
|
259.30
|
1.64
|
3
|
Cyclohexanebutanal, 2- methyl-3-oxo-, cis-
|
10.276
|
C11H18O2
|
182.25
|
1.79
|
4
|
Oleic Acid
|
10.664
|
C18H34O2
|
282.46
|
2.13
|
5
|
2-Isopropyl-5-methyl-6- oxabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane- 1-carboxalde
|
10.989
|
C10H16O2
|
168.23
|
0.78
|
6
|
Z-(13,14-Epoxy)tetradec- 11-en-1-ol acetate
|
11.989
|
C16H28O3
|
268.39
|
1.32
|
7
|
Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol, 2-allyl-1,7,7-trimethyl-
|
14.539
|
C10H18O
|
154.24
|
0.84
|
8
|
2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro- 4,4,7a-trimethyl-
|
16.990
|
C11H16O2
|
180.24
|
1.49
|
9
|
Tetradecane, 2,6,10- trimethyl-
|
20.634
|
C17H36
|
240.46
|
2.31
|
10
|
Tetradecanoic acid
|
22.203
|
C14H28O2
|
228.37
|
2.30
|
11
|
2-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-trimethyl-
|
24.160
|
C18H36O
|
268.47
|
1.90
|
12
|
Pentadecanoic acid
|
24.860
|
C15H30O2
|
242.39
|
2.03
|
13
|
n-Hexadecanoic acid
|
27.385
|
C16H32O2
|
256.42
|
41.88
|
14
|
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-
|
29.879
|
C18H32O2
|
280.44
|
19.49
|
15
|
Oleic Acid
|
30.105
|
C18H34O2
|
282.5
|
3.47
|
16
|
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 2-hydroxy-1- (hydroxymethyl)ethyl
|
32.768
|
C21H38O4
|
354.52
|
3.62
|
17
|
Hexadecanoic acid, 2- hydroxy-1- (hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester
|
33.530
|
C19H38O4
|
330.50
|
4.51
|
18
|
Hexadecanoic acid, 1- (hydroxymethyl)-1,2- ethanediyl ester
|
34.124
|
C19H38O4
|
330.50
|
3.13
|
19
|
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 2-hydroxy-1- (hydroxymethyl)ethyl
|
35.562
|
C21H40O4
|
356.5
|
4.28
|
20
|
Trilinolein
|
38.475
|
C57H98O6
|
879.38
|
0.45
|
3.5 Antioxidant activity of P. hornemannii
3.5.1 ABTS inhibition assay
Antioxidants are electron donors that are soluble in both hydrophilic and lipophilic media. A major advantage of the ABTS tests over the DPPH assay is that they demonstrate steric hindrance in antioxidant molecules (Demirkiran et al. 2013). Compared to the standard, P. hornemannii showed greater inhibition activity at maximum concentrations, e.g., results of 52.27 ± 0.3 above 6% (Fig. 3A). This is quite impressive, considering previously reported 56.84 ± 0.41% scavenging activity from Hypnea valentiae. Chakraborty et al. (2015) found profoundly higher ABTS scavenging activity (63.3%) from the ethyl acetate fraction of H. musciform, when compared to H. valentiae (27.9%) and J. rubens (11.0%). Further, some studies have shown that G. edulis had significantly higher antioxidant activities (40.24%) than G. corticata (32.65%) (Arulkumar et al. 2018). Accordingly, the present researchers have drawn the conclusion that the scavenging activity of red seaweeds could be explained by the presence of carotenes and other pigments that contain long hydrocarbon chains and aromatic compounds (Chew et al. 2008).
3.5.2 Hydroxyl radical scavenging assay
The hydroxyl radical is thought to initiate lipid peroxidation by blocking hydrogen atoms from unsaturated fatty acids (Kappus 1991). Compared to standard ascorbic acid, P. hornemannii showed significant activity at its maximum concentration (75.94 ± 0.3%) in scavenging hydroxyl radicals. A comparison of the hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of the algal extract and standard is shown in Fig. 3B. Researchers found that Kappaphycus alvarezii and Kappaphycus striatum have significant antioxidant properties when dissolved in various solvents and fractionations (Diyana et al. 2015). Additionally, several other red seaweeds, which have scavenging potentials, were also identified in this study, including Hypnea musciformis (43.01 ± 0.81 mg/mL), Hypnea valentiae (32.75 ± 1.03 mg/mL), and Jania rubens (27.63 ± 1.36 mg/mL) (Fayaz et al. 2005) (Aboul-Enein et al. 2003)
3.6 Larvicidal activity of MEPH
The larvicidal potential of MEPH against three mosquito species, including Ae. aegypti, An. stephensi and Cx. quinquefasciatus was confirmed by the lethality of larvae produced by the secondary metabolites. From the various concentrations of MEPH, we observed considerable mosquito larval mortality that lasted for up to 24 h. The larval mortality (%) produced by the CEPH and MEPH were presented in Fig. 4. Overall the MEPH showed maximum mortality (100%) in Cx. quinquefasciatus at the maximum concentration (25ppm) followed by An. stephensi (71%) and Ae. Aegypti (44%). Contrastingly, no significant mortality was recorded from the mosquitoes treated with CEPH. Notably, CEPH produced 58% of Cx. quinquefasciatus and 35% of An. stephensi larval mortality. MEPH produced lethality in terms of the LC50 value of 33.100 (23.083–82.757) and the LC90 value of 310.447 (108.917-6627.187) of Aedes aegypti. In the following experiment, Anopheles stephensi was found to be susceptible with an LC50 value of 9.805 (6.196–12.971) and LC90 value of 117.075 (54.406-1060.957). Moreover, the maximum lethality value of Culex quinquefasciatus was also determined based on the methanol extract, with LC50 values of 2.476 (0.769–4.019) and LC90 values of 13.207 (10.1212–18.170) ppm. As can be seen in Table 3, the results are summarized. There is some evidence that a methanol extract of P. hornemannii exhibited some larvicidal activity against Cx. quinquefasciatus indicating a specific potential.
Table 3
Larvicidal activity of P. hornemannii
Sample
|
Larva
|
LC50 (mg/l) (LCL-UCL)
|
LC90 (mg/l) (LCL-UCL)
|
χ2
|
df
|
CEPH
|
Ae. aegypti
|
116.194 (48.428-10010.391)
|
1404.277 (218.032–2.524)
|
2.410
|
13
|
An. stephensi
|
68.596 (34.499-1559.943)
|
1215.955 (202.551-704.204)
|
1.702
|
13
|
Cx. Quinquefasciatus
|
21.264 (15.415–44.853)
|
335.975 (102.709-21384-153)
|
2.654
|
13
|
MEPH
|
Ae. aegypti
|
33.100 (23.083–82.757)
|
310.447 (108.917-6627.187)
|
1.195
|
13
|
An. stephensi
|
9.805 (6.196–12.971)
|
117.075 (54.406-1060.957)
|
1.313
|
13
|
Cx. Quinquefasciatus
|
2.476 (0.769–4.019)
|
13.207 (10.272–19.127)
|
10.139
|
13
|
LC50-Lethal concentration kills 50% of the exposed larvae; LC90-Lethal concentration kills 90% of the exposed larvae. LCL-Lower confidence limit, UCL- Upper confidence limit, χ2 Chi-square value, df = degrees of freedom. |
Halymenia palmata and its fractions have been studied previously for their larvicidal capabilities. Research has shown that the plant's wet root extract, when used in conjunction with its flavonoids, is very effective against the larvae of the fourth instar of Aedes aegypti, followed by the larvae of the third, second, and the first instars. Patil et al. (2012) found that mosquito larvae in the fourth instar have a better immune system than larvae in younger instars. During a previous study, it was shown that extracts from marine seaweed species such as Caulerpa scapelliformis, Dictyota dichotoma, Enteromorpha clathrata, E.intestinalis, and Ulva lactuca exhibited prominent larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti larvae in the fourth instar with IC50 values of 53.70, 61.65, 85.11, 67.70, and 91.20, respectively. The LC50 and the LC90 of the extract of C. scalpelliformis used in a study to test the mosquito protection properties of the seaweed against larvae of two and three instars of Culex pipiens were determined to be 338.91 and 1891.31 (µg/mL) respectively (Cetin et al. 2010). As a result of numerous studies, it is beneficial to add hydro-ethanolic extracts of marine microalgae (Acanthopora spicifera, D. dichotoma and E. intestinalis) to mosquito repellents in the control of mosquito-borne diseases (Beula et al. 2011). Yu et al. (2015) investigated the larvicidal properties of a sesquiterpene isolated from 15 seaweeds from northeastern Brazil against the dengue-causing mosquito, A. aegypti. In addition, Laurencia dendroidea was found to contain larvicidal properties directed at the dengue-causing mosquito. There has been plenty of research evidenced on natural insecticides from marine sources, in particular seaweeds which play an important role in biological properties due to their active components.