Univariate Analysis
Table 1 shows the percentage distribution of women who had their last birth during the five years preceding the survey and had utilized ANC services by their background characteristics. A total of 10045 women reported to have utilized ANC during their last pregnancy preceding the 2016 UDHS. Only 30.3% of these women had their first ANC visit during their first trimester. Over half (53.0%) were aged between 20 to 29 years, and 13.7% were adolescents. Their mean age was 28 years. The proportion of women married and living together was 82.3%. Majority of households where women resided were headed by males (73.1%). The average parity among women and average number of household members were four children per woman and six people per household correspondingly. Over half (61.2%) of the women had primary school education with slightly over a quarter (26.4%) having secondary education or higher. Majority of the women resided in rural areas (79.9%), belonged to either the Anglican or Catholic denomination (72%) and were employed (79.9%). Over half (54.0%) of the women belonged to the rich wealth index bracket. Over half (63.4%) of the women resided in communities that were inaccessible to the health facility. Nearly three-quarters (73%) of women belong to communities that were socioeconomically disadvantaged. Slightly above three quarters of the women (78.3%) belonged to a less diverse community. A higher proportion (73.4%) of women belonged to communities which are not media saturated (See Table 1).
Table 1
Percentage distribution of women who had their last birth 5 years prior the 2016 UDHS and who utilized ANC services by background characteristic
Characteristics | All Women N = 10045 | Percentage |
OUTCOME VARIABLE | | |
Timing of ANC | | |
First trimester | 3044 | 30.3 |
Second trimester | 7001 | 69.7 |
INDIVIDUAL VARIABLES | | |
Age at last birth | | |
<=19 | 1376 | 13.7 |
20–29 | 5323 | 53.0 |
30–39 | 2822 | 28.1 |
40+ | 524 | 5.2 |
Marital Status | | |
Single | 557 | 5.5 |
Married | 4168 | 41.5 |
Living together | 4095 | 40.8 |
Previous married | 1226 | 12.2 |
Household Head | | |
Male | 7339 | 73.1 |
Female | 2706 | 26.9 |
Parity | | |
1 | 1958 | 19.5 |
2–3 | 3351 | 33.4 |
4+ | 4736 | 47.1 |
Family Size | | |
<=4 | 3358 | 33.4 |
5–6 | 3068 | 30.5 |
7+ | 3619 | 36.0 |
Level of Education | | |
No education | 1238 | 12.3 |
Primary | 6156 | 61.3 |
Secondary or Higher | 2651 | 26.4 |
Place of Residence | | |
Urban | 2010 | 20.0 |
Rural | 8035 | 80.0 |
Wealth Index | | |
Poor | 4628 | 46.1 |
Middle | 1915 | 19.1 |
Rich | 3502 | 34.8 |
Religion | | |
Anglican | 3112 | 31.0 |
Catholic | 4117 | 41.0 |
Muslim | 1263 | 12.5 |
Other’s | 1553 | 15.5 |
Employment Status | | |
Unemployed | 2024 | 20.1 |
Employed | 8021 | 79.9 |
COMMUNITY VARIABLES | | |
Community Distance to Health Facility | | |
Inaccessible | 6280 | 62.5 |
Accessible | 3680 | 36.5 |
Community Socioeconomic Status | | |
Disadvantaged | 6543 | 65.1 |
Advantaged | 3502 | 34.9 |
Community Ethnicity Diversity Index | | |
Less Diverse | 5864 | 58.4 |
More Diverse | 4181 | 41.6 |
Community Media Saturation | | |
Less Saturated | 7356 | 73.2 |
Saturated | 2689 | 26.8 |
Bivariate Analysis
Table 2 shows the percentage distribution of women who had their last birth 5 years prior the 2016 UDHS and utilized ANC services by timing of ANC and background characteristic. Close to about a third of the women who utilized ANC services (30.3%) did so during the first trimester. The proportion of women who first utilized ANC services during the first trimester differed significantly by woman’s age at birth of last child, marital status, sex of head of household, woman’s parity, household size, education, religion, community’s access to the nearest health facility and community’s media saturation.
Table 2
Percentage distribution of women who had their last birth 5 years prior the 2016 UDHS and utilized ANC services by timing of ANC and background characteristic
Variables | First trimester (%) | Second trimester (%) | All women N = 10045 | P-Value |
INDIVIDUAL VARIABLES | | | | |
Age at last birth | | | | 0.001 |
<=19 | 28.3 | 71.7 | 1376 | |
20–29 | 31.9 | 68.1 | 5323 | |
30–39 | 29.1 | 70.9 | 2822 | |
40+ | 26.0 | 74.0 | 524 | |
Marital Status | | | | 0.014 |
Single | 28.7 | 71.3 | 558 | |
Married | 31.4 | 68.6 | 4175 | |
Living together | 28.7 | 71.3 | 4102 | |
Previous married | 32.5 | 67.5 | 1226 | |
Household Head | | | | 0.463 |
Male | 30.1 | 69.9 | 7339 | |
Female | 30.9 | 69.1 | 2706 | |
Parity | | | | 0.000 |
1 | 30.8 | 69.1 | 1958 | |
2–3 | 32.9 | 67.1 | 3351 | |
4+ | 28.2 | 71.8 | 4736 | |
Family Size | | | | 0.000 |
<=4 | 32.5 | 67.5 | 3358 | |
5–6 | 30.8 | 69.2 | 3068 | |
7+ | 27.9 | 72.1 | 3619 | |
Level of Education | | | | 0.000 |
No education | 36.0 | 64.0 | 1238 | |
Primary | 28.6 | 71.4 | 6156 | |
Secondary or Higher | 31.6 | 68.4 | 2651 | |
Place of Residence | | | | 0.331 |
Urban | 31.2 | 68.8 | 2010 | |
Rural | 30.1 | 69.9 | 8035 | |
Wealth Index | | | | 0.105 |
Poor | 30.1 | 69.9 | 4628 | |
Middle | 28.7 | 71.3 | 1915 | |
Rich | 31.4 | 68.6 | 3502 | |
Religion | | | | 0.002 |
Anglican | 29.5 | 70.4 | 3112 | |
Catholic | 32.2 | 67.8 | 4117 | |
Muslim | 27.1 | 72.9 | 1263 | |
Other’s | 29.3 | 70.7 | 1553 | |
Employment Status | | | | 0.913 |
Unemployed | 30.2 | 69.8 | 2024 | |
Employed | 30.3 | 69.7 | 8021 | |
COMMUNITY VARIABLES | | | | |
Community Distance to Health Facility | | | | 0.030 |
Inaccessible | 29.5 | 70.5 | 6280 | |
Accessible | 31.6 | 68.4 | 3680 | |
Community Socioeconomic Status | | | | 0.077 |
Low | 29.7 | 70.5 | 6543 | |
High | 31.4 | 68.4 | 3502 | |
Community Ethnicity Diversity Index | | | | 0.791 |
Less Diverse | 30.2 | 69.8 | 5864 | |
More Diverse | 30.4 | 69.6 | 4181 | |
Community Media Saturation | | | | 0.004 |
Less Saturated | 29.5 | 70.5 | 7356 | |
Saturated | 32.5 | 67.5 | 2689 | |
Total | 30.3 | 69.7 | 10045 | |
Nearly a third (31.9%) of women aged 20 to 29 years old had their first ANC visit during their first trimester as compared to women aged less than 19 years old (28.3%), women aged 30 to 39 years (29.1%) and those aged 40 years and above (26%). A third (32.5%) of the women were previously married utilized ANC services during the first trimester compared to those married (31.4%), and those living together and single (28.7%) respectively. A lower proportion (28.2%) of women who had four or more children made their first ANC visit compared to their counterparts with 2 to 3 children (32.9%) and 1 child (30.8%). Slightly above a quarter (27.9%) of women who belong to households with seven or more members first utilized ANC services during their first trimester as compared to about a third (32.5%) and 30.8% who resided in households with fours or less members and 5 to 6 members respectively. Over third (36%) of women with no education utilized ANC services during the first trimester as compared to those with a primary and secondary or higher level of education (28.6% and 31.6% respectively). Only 27.1% of women affiliated to Muslim religion reported to have first utilized ANC services during the first trimester as compared to women affiliated to other religion (Anglican (29.5%), Catholic (32.2% and other religious groups 29.3%). The proportion of women who utilized ANC services in the first trimester was significantly higher (31.6%) for women residing in from communities that are averagely accessible to the nearest health facility as compared to their counterparts who resided in inaccessible communities (29.5%). A third of women (32.5%) who resided in communities with a higher media saturation utilized their first antenatal care service during the first trimester as compared to 29.5% of women who resided in communities with less media saturation (See Table 2).
Multilevel Analysis
The multilevel logistic regression results for timing of first antenatal care service visit by women in Uganda are shown in Table 3 with four models. The first model (model 1) which is the empty model, investigated the intercept and random variance component. The findings show a variance coefficient was statistically significant (\(\tau =0.331 , p=0.000)\). In this model, the intra-community correlation coefficient was 9.14%. This indicates the presence of clustering of timing of first ANC service utilization during the first trimester between the Enumerated Areas (EA) due to unobserved individual and community level variables in Uganda. Model 2 included the individual level variables only.
Table 3
Multilevel Analysis showing the Odd Ratio’s on the effect of Individual and Community level factors on timing of ANC utilization in Uganda, UDHS 2016
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
Empty Model | Individual level | Community level | Individual/ Community level |
Odd Ratio (95% CI) | Odd Ratio (95% CI) | Odd Ratio (95% CI) | Odd Ratio (95% CI) |
INDIVIDUAL VARIABLES | | | | |
Age at last birth | | | | |
<=19 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
20–29 | | 1.17*(0.99–1.37) | | 1.17 (0.99–1.37) |
30–39 | | 1.12 (0.92–1.37) | | 1.12 (0.92–1.37) |
40+ | | 0.95 (0.72–1.26) | | 0.96 (0.72–1.26) |
Marital Status | | | | |
Single | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
Married | | 1.16 (0.92–1.46) | | 1.12 (0.89–1.40) |
Living together | | 0.99 (0.80–1.24) | | 0.99 (0.79–1.24) |
Previous married | | 1.30*(1.02–1.65) | | 1.32*(1.04–1.68) |
Household Head | | | | |
Male | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
Female | | 0.94 (0.84–1.05) | | 0.937 (0.84–1.05) |
Parity | | | | |
1 | | 1 | | 1.00 |
2–3 | | 0.98 (0.84–1.13) | | 0.99 (0.86–1.15) |
4+ | | 0.82*(0.69–0.99) | | 0.85 (0.71–1.01) |
Family Size | | | | |
<=4 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
5–6 | | 0.96 (0.85–1.08) | | 0.95 (0.84–1.06) |
7+ | | 0.88*(0.78–0.99) | | 0.86*(0.76–0.97) |
Level of Education | | | | |
No education | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
Primary | | 0.76***(0.65–0.88) | | 0.78**(0.67-090) |
Secondary or Higher | | 0.78*(0.65–0.93) | | 0.99*(0.65–0.95) |
Place of Residence | | | | |
Urban | | 1.00 | | 1 |
Rural | | 1.07 (0.91–1.26) | | 0.62**(0.45–0.83) |
Wealth Index | | | | |
Poor | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
Middle | | 1.05 (0.91–1.20) | | 1.07 (0.94–1.25) |
Rich | | 1.09 (0.95–1.24) | | 1.09 (0.97–1.37) |
Religion | | | | |
Anglican | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
Catholic | | 1.04 (0.93–1.16) | | 1.03 (0.92–1.15) |
Muslim | | 0.84*(0.71–0.99) | | 0.84*(0.72–0.99) |
Other’s | | 0.97 (0.84–1.12) | | 0.97 (0.84–1.12) |
Employment Status | | | | |
Unemployed | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
Employed | | 1.02 (0.92–1.26) | | 1.01(0.90–1.14) |
COMMUNITY VARIABLES | | | | |
Community Distance to Health Facility | | | | |
Accessible | | | 1.00 | 1 |
Inaccessible | | | 0.70**(0.56–0.87) | 0.36***(0.23–0.55) |
Community Socioeconomic Status | | | | |
Low | | | 1.00 | 1.00 |
High | | | 1.19*(1.05–1.38) | 1.18*(1.05–1.34) |
Community Ethnicity Diversity Index | | | | |
Less Diverse | | | 1.00 | 1.00 |
More Diverse | | | 1.09 (0.85–1.39) | 1.19 (0.85–1.38) |
Community Media Saturation | | | | |
Less Saturated | | | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Saturated | | | 1.23*(1.05–1.34) | 1.19*(1.05–1.34) |
Intercept | -0.85 (0.43)*** | -0.91 (0.41)*** | -0.87 (0.41)*** | -0.48 (0.62)*** |
Random intercept variance | 0.331 | 0.313 | 0.342 | 0.308 |
ICC(%) | 9.14 | 8.69 | 9.42 | 8.56 |
PCV | Reference | 6.36 | 1.82 | 9.09 |
AIC | 44442.571 | 44674.363 | 44505.257 | 44730.028 |
BIC | 44451.785 | 44681.575 | 44512.471 | 44737.240 |
Note: The Empty Model contain no variables, but it partitioned the variance into two component parts. AIC = Akaike Information Criterion, BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion, CI = Confidence Interval, PCV = Proportional Change in Variance,® Reference category, VPC = Variance Partitioned Coefficient, Significant level, ***p = < .001, **p < .01, *p < .05. |
Individual level variables associated with timing of first antenatal care service utilization by women in Uganda in model 1 include age at last birth, marital status, parity, education, religion, and family size. Being aged 20 to 29 years increased odds of a woman visiting antenatal care services during the first trimester (Odds Ratio, 1.17, CI 0.99–1.37) when compared to women aged less than 20 years. Women who were formerly married were more likely to use ANC during the first trimester (Odds Ratios, 1.30, CI 1.02–1.65) compared to single women. Having four or more children decreased the odds of utilizing ANC services during the first trimester (Odds Ratio, 0.82, CI 0.69–0.99). Women who had primary and secondary or higher education were less likely to utilize antenatal care during the first trimester (Odds Ratio, 0.76, CI 0.65–0.88, and 0.78, CI 0.65–0.93 respectively) as compared to women with no education. Being affiliated to the Islamic religion reduced the odds of utilizing ANC services during the first trimester (Odd Ratio, 0.84, CI 0.71–0.99) when compared to those affiliated with the Anglican religion. Residing in a household with seven or more family members reduced the odds of utilizing antenatal care during the first trimester (Odds Ratio, 0.88, CI 0.78–0.99) when compared to women residing in households with four or less members. The random intercept variance was (\(\tau\) = 0.313, p = 0.000) which gave a proportional reduction change of 6.36 from the empty model. The ICC reduced by 8.7%, meaning the clustering of timing in the first utilization of antenatal care services may be related to the composition of individual level characteristics.
Model 3 included the community level variables only results indicate that the community ethnicity diversity index variable was not associated with timing of antenatal care service utilization among women in Uganda. Timing of first ANC visit was significantly associated with the community’s accessibility to the nearest health facility, community’s socioeconomic status and community’s media saturation. The odds of women utilizing antenatal care during the first trimester decreased significantly with community accessibility to nearest health facility (Odd Ratio, 0.70, CI 0.56–0.87). Women who resided in communities with high socioeconomic status were more likely to utilize ANC during the first trimester compared to women who resided in communities with low socioeconomic status (Odd Ratio, 1.19, CI 1.05–1.38). The model reveals that residing in communities with high media saturation increased the odds of utilizing ANC during the first trimester (Odd Ratio, 1.23, CI 1.05–1.34) compared to those residing in communities with low media saturation. The variance for the random intercept increased and was statistically significant (\(\tau\) = 0.342, p = 0.000). The ICC was increased to 9.4% compared to model 2. The percentage increase of ICC from model 3 indicates that the clustering of timing of first visit to ANC was also related to community level factors.
Model 4 introduced both the individual and community level variables. In this model, timing of first ANC utilization was association with marital status, level of education, religion, residence, and household family size. The odds of utilizing ANC services in the first trimester remained higher among formerly married (Odd Ratios, 1.32, CI 1.04–1.68) compared to the never married (single). The odds of utilizing ANC services in the first trimester decreased for women with some level of education. Women who had primary education or higher were less likely to attend ANC services during the first trimester when compared to women without any formal education (Odd Ratios, 0.78, CI 0.67-090 and 0.79, CI 0.65–0.95 respectively). Women who were affiliated to the Islamic religion were less likely to utilize ANC services during the first trimester (Odd Ratios, 0.84) compared to women affiliated to the Anglican religion. Women who resided in rural areas were less likely to attend ANC services during the first trimester (Odd Ratios, 0.62, CI 0.45–0.83) when compared to those in urban areas. Women who belong to households with seven or more members were less likely to utilize ANC during the first trimester compared to their counterpart residing in households with 4 or less family members (Odd Ratios, 0.86, CI 0.76–0.97). Further, women who lived in communities that were Inaccessible to the nearest health facility were almost three times less likely to attend ANC during the first trimester, compared to those who resided in accessible communities (Odd Ratios, 0.36, CI 0.23–0.55). Women who lived in communities with high socioeconomic status were more likely to utilize ANC in the first trimester, compared to their counterpart residing in communities with low socioeconomic status (Odd Ratios, 1.18, CI 1.05–1.34). Women who resided in media saturated communities were more likely to utilize ANC during the first trimester compared to women who reside in area with less media saturated communities (Odd Ratios, 1.19, CI 1.05–1.34). Comparatively the random intercept remained statistically significant in1.02-1.65 the final model (\(\tau\) = 0.308, p = 0.000). The ICC decreased to 8.6% from that of ICC in model 3 showing that inclusion of both the individual and community level factors was important in explaining the timing of the first ANC visit by women. The overall model fit statistics AIC and BIC shows that community level characteristics increased the fit of the multilevel model in explaining the variations in the timing of first antenatal care services across community (See Table 3).