vACcine COnfidence amongst those living with alleRgy during the coviD pandemic (ACCORD): a scoping review protocol

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1555382/v1

PDF

Research

vACcine COnfidence amongst those living with alleRgy during the coviD pandemic (ACCORD): a scoping review protocol

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1555382/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background Reports of allergic reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines have been documented, which may also contribute to hesitancy. Despite the low likelihood that the COVID-19 vaccine will trigger an allergic reaction, we and others have reported that families with allergy remain vaccine hesitant due to concerns of COVID-19-vaccine-triggered anaphylaxis.

Objective To present our scoping review protocol, that will inform a forthcoming living scoping review in which we will investigate the peer-reviewed and grey literature on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and allergic disease and/or allergic reactions following a COVID-19 vaccine.

Methods Informed by Arksey and O’Malley framework for methodological review, we have developed a search strategy with content and methodological experts, and which has undergone Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies review. A search of 4 scientific databases, as well as gray literature, will be performed without restriction to articles by type of COVID-19 vaccine, or country of study, and will include publications in the 10 languages our team can handle. Bi-monthly search alerts based on the search strategy will be generated.

Results The first search will result in a stand alone peer reviewed scoping review. Bi-monthly updates will be posted on a pre-print server. Depending on the volume of literature, these updates will be synthesized and submitted for peer-review at 6 and/or 12 months.

Conclusion COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy amongst individuals with allergy persists, despite very low risk of serious adverse reactions. Our living scoping review, which includes multiple forms of knowledge translation, will be a rigorous way to address hesitancy.

allergy

anaphylaxis

COVID

hesitancy

serious adverse events

scoping review

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted families worldwide. In the early weeks of the pandemic, we reported elevated rates of maternal anxiety and depression relative to population norms (1). Yet, anxiety was even more pronounced amongst mothers with a child with food allergy (2) as well as those who consumed more COVID-19-related news (3). Indeed, the sheer volume and, the misinformation about COVID-19, has contributed to the World Health Organization’s description of an “infodemic” (4). Unfortunately, research suggests that the propagation and consumption of misinformation online is associated with greater vaccine hesitancy (5), which has been described as “the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19” (6). Moreover, reports of allergic reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines have been documented (7), which may also contribute to hesitancy (8). When reports of anaphylactic reactions triggered by the COVID-19 vaccine were first reported by patients, it was suspected, but not confirmed, that one of the triggers for these reactions was polyethylene glycol, or PEG (7, 9). Although PEG is nearly ubiquitous in personal hygiene products and medications, pre-COVID reports of PEG-triggered anaphylaxis are rare, at 37 cases globally between 1977 and 2016 (10). As more evidence is accumulated, the role of PEG is minor, if any, in the development of allergic reactions to vaccines (11, 12).

Despite the low likelihood that the COVID-19 vaccine will trigger an allergic reaction (13–15), we (16) and others (17, 18) have reported that families with allergy remain vaccine hesitant due to concerns of COVID-19-vaccine-triggered anaphylaxis. A meta-analysis published in January 2022, of highly heterogeneous studies on the association between anaphylaxis and COVID-19 vaccines provides very modest evidence of a slight increased odds of patient-reported anaphylactic reactions post-administration of an authorised vaccine amongst those aged 18–85 years, and particularly amongst females (19). Notably, mRNA vaccines were associated with the lowest risk of anaphylaxis. The reported increase of anaphylaxis amongst women was attributed to hormonal regulation (19), an observation that may align with sex-specific reactions to other vaccines described elsewhere (20). Whereas any type of vaccination carries risk, the authors of this recent meta-analysis failed to contextualise the risk of anaphylaxis associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, or the minimal increased risk of anaphylaxis in relation to the risk of COVID-19 complications. These modest differences notwithstanding, of equal concern is the role of gender. Women, compared to men, make between 80–90% of healthcare decisions for their families, and are more likely to act as caregivers (21–23). This caregiver role has been described amongst families managing a child’s food allergy, with 14% of mothers but no fathers reporting career limitations due to food allergy (24). These observations, coupled with the COVID-19 infodemic, has underscored the need for a comprehensive, regularly updated review of literature surrounding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy amongst those managing allergy.

The synthesis of individual research studies and interpreting them in a global context is an essential component of knowledge creation, and in turn, will contribute to knowledge translation (25). To this end, the first objective of this scoping review is to investigate the peer-reviewed and grey literature on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and allergic disease and/or allergic reactions following a COVID-19 vaccine, that will be regularly maintained and updated as new evidence is published. The second objective is to inform knowledge translation activities resulting from this scoping review.

For the aims of the proposed project, a scoping review is preferable to a systematic review as the former is useful when examining emerging evidence when there is a lack of clarity as to what more specific questions may be valuably addressed in a systematic review (26), and in which we have documented expertise (27–30).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

We will not restrict articles by type of COVID-19 vaccine or by country of study. Gray literature searches will be restricted to those published languages spoken by the research team (Table 1).

Concept

In keeping with the Arksey and O’Malley framework for methodological reviews (31), searches and screening will be independently but concurrently performed by trained staff (initials blinded for review). Articles will be included based on consensus. In the event of conflicts, the study lead (initials blinded for review) will guide a decision.

Information sources

Four scientific databases (CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline, Embase) will be searched, but no restrictions to patient age or language of publication. Due to the nature of the topic, the literature will be exclusively from 2020 onward.

Gray literature sites will include, but are not limited to websites of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and World Health Organization.

Initial search strategy

The original search will be guided by (initials blinded for review), approved by the study lead (blinded for review), then peer-reviewed by a librarian colleague, per Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies guidelines (32). The search strategy is presented in Table 2.

Screening

After the initial search, all citations will be uploaded into Rayyan (33). Trained student research assistants will de-duplicate the search. Thereafter, they will independently perform title and abstract screening, noting which studies are to be excluded or included from the full text screening. This process will be blinded, such that each screener does not have access to whether the other screener has decided to include or exclude an article based on the title/abstract.

After the title and abstract screening is complete, full texts will be uploaded to Rayyan (33). Full text screening will follow the same process as for the title and abstract screening described above. Decisions whether to exclude (and the reason for exclusion) or include the full text in the review will be based on the inclusion criteria. Once screeners have independently screened the full texts, the results will be unblinded. Screeners will meet to discuss any conflicts, and in they event they cannot agree whether an article should be included, they will defer to the study lead or her designate.

For articles that are published in languages other than English, the decision to exclude or include an article will be at the discretion of the team member(s) who speak/read that language. Screeners will direct the article(s) to team members who read the particular language.

For all included articles, data will be extracted into tables. The tables, at a minimum, will include the study’s title, authors, year of publication, country of the participants, aims, sample size, study methodology, outcome measures, and key findings. At the point of extraction, the students will be asked to extract all information that may be relevant to the review. A flow chart of the search process will also be included in the initial scoping review, per the structure provided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (34).

Bi-monthly update

A bi-monthly search alert based on the search strategy will be generated by health sciences librarian (initials blinded for review). The students assigned to this project will be tasked with screening these articles and assessing if they should be excluded or included. Conflicts between the students regarding the inclusion of particular articles will be solved through discussion. If the students cannot agree, the study lead or her designate will be asked to make the final decision.

Patient engagement

Patients have been involved at all stages of this study, a process that we commit to continuing.

Ethics

As this is a scoping review of existing literature, no ethical approval is required. However, the overarching study has been approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board.

Knowledge translation

Following preparation of the manuscript, we will post it on a pre-print server, and submit for publication. Per conditions of funding of COVID grants, this – and all resulting publications from this project – must be open access. These updates will follow the same process as described above. Bi-monthly updates will be posted on a pre-print server. Depending on the volume of literature, these updates will be synthesized and submitted for peer-review at 6 and/or 12 months.

Plain language summaries, in the form of infographics, will be posted on the study lead’s website (35) and shared widely on social media.

PEG polyethylene glycol

Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable; this is a scoping review protocol and thus does not require ethical approval

Consent for publication Not applicable

Availability of data and materials Not applicable

Competing interests MA declares no competing interests. NA declares no competing interests. AB declares no competing interests. KM declares no competing interests. EA is a member of Food Allergy Canada’s Medical Advisory Board, and does research with DBV Technologies.

PB reports personal fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, DBV Technologies, ALK, and Aralez outside the submitted work and research support from Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi outside the submitted work. MB-S a Member of the Board, Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and on the steering committee for Canada’s National Food Allergy Action Plan.

EL is the co-founder and director of Science for All Audiences (SciFAA). LR declares no competing interests. VP declares no competing interests. JP is Section Head, Allied Health and Member of the Board, Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; sits on the steering committee for Canada’s National Food Allergy Action Plan; reports research support from CIHR; Canadian Allergy, Asthma Immunology Foundation; Research Manitoba; Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba; Manitoba Medical Services Foundation; George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation; and, the University of Manitoba outside the submitted work; and, personal fees from Novartis outside the submitted work.

Funding Funding for this project was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence – Operating Grant (Nominated Principal Applicant J Protudjer). The funder played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.

Authors’ contributions MA contributed to the development of the search terms, and co-wrote the first draft of the manuscript. NA developed the search strategy. AB and KM are leading the search, and approved the manuscript. EM, PB, MB-S, EL, LR, VP contributed to the study design and approved the manuscript. JP contributed to the development of the search terms, and co-wrote the first draft of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements Not applicable

Disclosure statement

MG reports no conflicts of interest.

NA reports no conflicts of interest.

AB reports no conflicts of interest.

KM reports no conflicts of interest.

EA is Section Head of Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis, Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; and, a member of Food Allergy Canada’s Medical Advisory Board.

PB reports personal fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, ALK, Bausch Health and Aralez, as well as grants from DBV, Regeneron, Novartis and Sanofi outside the current proposal.

MB-S reports consultancy for Novartis and Sanofi.

EL reports consultancy for Novartis.

LR reports no conflicts of interest.

VP reports no conflict of interest

JP is Section Head of Allied Health, Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; sits on the steering committee for Canada’s National Food Allergy Action Plan, and reports consultancy for Novartis and ALK.

Cameron EC, Joyce K, Delaquis C, Reynolds K, Protudjer JLP, Roos L. Maternal psychological distress & mental health services use during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2020;276:765–74.
Protudjer JLP, Golding MA, Salisbury MR, Abrams EM, Roos LE. High anxiety and health-related quality-of-life in families with children with food allergy during COVID-19. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;126(1):83–8.
Golding M, Salisbury MR, Reynolds K, Roos LE, Protudjer JL. COVID-19-related media consumption and parental mental health Can J Behav Sci. 2021;accepted for publication on 20210329.
World Health Organization. Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting healthy behaviours and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation [updated 20200923]. Available from: https://www.who.int.
Puri N, Coomes EA, Haghbayan H, Gunaratne K. Social media and vaccine hesitancy: new updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases. Hum Vacc Immunotherap. 2020;11:1–8.
Dror AA, Eisnenbach N, Taiber S, Morozov NG, Zigron A, Srouji S, et al. Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5893.
Pitlick MM, Sitek AN, Kinate SA, Joshi AY, Park MA. Polyethylene glycol and polysorbate skin testing in the evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine reactions: early report. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;[in press].
Carrieri V, Madio L, Principe F. Vaccine hesitancy and (fake) news: Quasi-experimental evidence from Italy. Health Econ. 2019;28(11):1377–82.
Cabanillas B, Akdis C, Novak N. Allergic reactions to the first COVID-19 vaccine: a potential role of polyethylene glycol? Allergy. 2020. doi:10.1111/all/14711.
Wenande E, Garvey LH. Immediate-type hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols: a review. Clin Exp Allergy. 2016;46(7):907–22.
Garvey LH, Nasser S. Anaphylaxis to the first COVID-19 vaccine: is polyethylene glycol (PEG) the culprit? Br J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;126(3):e106–8. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.020.
Abrams EM, Greenhawt M, Shaker M, Kosowan L, Singer AG. Primary care provider-reported prevalence of vaccine and polyethylene glycol allergy in Canada. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Oct;127(4):446–50.e1. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2021.05.011.
Banerji A, Wickner PG, Saff R, et al. mRNA vaccines to prevent COVID-19 disease and reported allergic reactions: current evidence and suggested approaches. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;S2213-98(20):31411–2.
Canadian Society of. Allergy and Clinical Immunology. COVID-19 resources 2021.
CDC COVID-19 Response Team; Food and Drug Administration. Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis After Receipt of the First Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine — United States, December 14–23, 2020. MMWR. 2021;70(2):46–51.
Gooding G, Gabrielli S, Protudjer JLP, Ben-Shoshan M. COVERS: COvid Vaccine Evaluation of Resources and Solutions. [in preparation].
Turner PJ, Larson H, Dubé È, Fisher A. Vaccine hesitancy: drivers and how the allergy community can help. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;S2213-98(21):763–7.
Erdeljic Turk V. Anaphylaxis associated with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: approach to allergy investigation. Clin Immunol. 2021;227:108748.
Sobczak M, Pawliczak R. The risk of anaphylaxis behind authorized COVID-19 vaccines: a meta-analysis. Clin Mol Allergy. 2022;(20):1.
Tramontana F, Battisti S, Napoli N, Strollo R. Immuno-endocrinology of COVID-19: the key role of sex hormones. Front Endocrinol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.726696.
U.S. Department of Labor. General facts on women and job based health. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. 2005. Available at: www.dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/fshlth5.html.
Zimmerman MK, Hill SA. Health care as a gendered system. In: Saltzman-Chafetz J, editor. Handbook of the sociology of gender. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1999. pp. 483–518.
Grant KR, Amaratunga C, Armstrong P et al, editors. Caring for/caring about: women, homecare, and unpaid caregiving. Aurora: Garamond Press, Ltd.; 2004.
Frykas TLM, Golding M, Abrams EM, Simons E, Protudjer JLP. Mothers of children with food allergies report poorer perceived life status which may be explained by limited career choices. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021;17(1):12. doi:10.1186/s13223-021-00515-8.
Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell C, Robinson N. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24. doi:10.1002/chp.47.
Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Method. 2018;18:143.
Golding MA, Gunnarsson NV, Middelveld R, Ahlstedt S, Protudjer JLP. A scoping review of the caregiver burden of pediatric food allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;S1081-1206(21):00342–2.
Hildebrand HV, Arias A, Simons E, Gerdts J, Povolo B, Rothney J, Protudjer JLP. Adult and pediatric food allergy to chickpea, pea, lentil, and lupine: a scoping review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(1):290–301.e2.
Protudjer JLP, Mikkelsen A. Veganism and paediatric food allergy: two increasingly prevalence dietary issues that are challenging when co-occurring. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):341.
Merrill KA, William TNN, Joyce KM, Roos LE, Protudjer JLP. Potential psychosocial impact of COVID-19 on children: a scoping review of pandemics and epidemics. J Global Health Rep. 2020;4.
Arkey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Social Res Method. 2005;8(1):19–32.
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, et al. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–6. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021.
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210. DOI:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MD, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. doi:10.7326/M18-0850.
<blinded for peer review>

Table 1. Languages which the project team can currently handle

Language

English

French

Spanish

Swedish

German

Filipino

Hebrew

Bosnian

Croatian

Serbian

Table 2. Search strategy

Database: Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily <1946 to December 14, 2021>

Search Strategy:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 exp covid-19 vaccines/ or exp Coronavirus/ or Coronavirus Infections/ or COVID-19/ (144410)

2 (coronavir* or corona vir* or betacorona* or OC43 or NL63 or D614G or 229E or HKU1 or hcov* or ncov* or covid* or sarscov* or sars cov* or sarscoronavir* or sars coronavir* or 2019ncov* or 19ncov* or novel cov* or 2019novel cov* or longcovid* or postcovid* or postcoronavir* or postsars*).mp. (229420)

3 (COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2).rx,px,ox,rn 4 (COVID-19 or COVID-19 serotherapy or ORF7b protein, SARS-CoV-2 or ORF6 protein, SARS-CoV-2 or ORF8 protein, SARS-CoV-2 or pediatric multisystem inflammatory disease, COVID-19 related or envelope protein, SARS-CoV-2 or ORF7a protein, SARS-CoV-2 or spike protein, SARS-CoV-2 or ORF3a protein, SARS-CoV-2 or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 or membrane protein, SARS-CoV-2 or ORF1ab polyprotein, SARS-CoV-2 or nucleocapsid protein, Coronavirus or COVID-19 vaccine).os,ps,rn,rs. (15173)

5 (variant* adj2 (alpha or beta or delta or gamma or kappa or lambda or mu or omicron or "b.1.1.7" or "b.1.351" or "p.1" or "b.1.617.2" or "b.1.1.529" or "c.37" or "b.1.621" or india or indian or south africa* or uk or british or english or brazil*)).mp. (5611)

6 ("mrna 1273" or elasomeran or cx024414 or "cx 024414" or "tak 919" or mrna1273 or tak919 or m1273 or "m 1273" or ad26covs1 or "ad26 cov2 s" or "jnj 78436735" or jnj78436735 or bnt162* or "bnt 162" or "bnt 162c2" or "bnt 162b2" or "pf 07302048" or pf07302048 or abdavomeran or pidacmeran or vaxzevria or spikevax or comirnaty or tozinameran or chadox1 or "chadox 1" or azd1222 or "azd 1222" or bibp or bbibpcorv or bbibp corv or sputnik or rad26-s or gamcovidvac or gam covid vac or gam kovid vak or coronavac or picovacc or covaxin or bbv152* or "bbv 152" or "bbv 152a" or "bbv 152b" or "bbv 152c" or ad5ncov or "ad5 ncov" or convidecia or pakvac or wibp or wibpcorv or abdala or cigb66 or "cigb 66" or epivaccorona or epi vac corona or auroracov or aurora cov or zifivax or zf2001 or soberana or finlayfr2 or "finlay fr 2" or pasteurcovac or qazcovid* or qazvac or nuvaxovid or covovax or nvxcov2373 or "nvx cov2373" or tak019 or "tak 019" or kconvac or covivac or coviran or covidful or mvccov1901 or mvc cov1901 or zycovd or "zycov d" or fakhravac or covax19 or "covax 19" or spikogen or ag0302 or "ag 0302" or convidicea or ad5ncov or ad5 ncov or "ad 5 ncov" or ganulameran or pittcovacc or nadorameran or zorecimeran or cvncov or reluscovtogene or ino4800 or "ino 4800").mp. (2999)

7 or/1-6 (238971)

8 exp vaccination refusal/ or antivaccination movement/ (819)

9 (exp immunization/ or exp immunization program/ or exp vaccines/) and (exp decision making/ or risk assessment/ or exp safety/ or trust/ or exp "patient acceptance of health care"/) (9680)

10 ((vaccin* or immuniz* or immunis*) adj6 (avoid* or doubt* or fear* or confiden* or concern* or hesita* or refus* or reject* or delay* or uncertain* or choice* or choos* or decid* or decis* or undecide* or barrier* or obstacle* or deter* or readiness or accept* or uptake or complian* or noncomplian* or risk*)).mp. (27628)

11 (antivac* or anti vac* or antivax* or anti vax*).mp. (1034)

12 or/8-11 (33989)

13 exp hypersensitivity/ or "allergy and immunology"/ or exp allergens/ or "insect bites and stings"/ or immunotherapy/ or exp desensitization, immunologic/ (433877)

14 (hypersensi* or hyper sensi* or hyperresponsiv* or hyper responsiv* or allergy or allergi* or allergen* or intoleran* or drug eruption* or dress syndrome* or erythema nodosum or cont?usiform* or nicolau* or serum sickness or stevens-johnson or lyell* or erythema multiforme or toxic epidermal necrolys* or photoallerg* or photo* contact dermati* or photo* dermati* or toxicodendron dermati* or rhus dermati* or vernal conjuncti* or vernal keratoconjuncti* or spring conjuncti* or summer bronchitis or anaphyla* or eczema or fancier* lung* or breeder* lung* or farmer* lung* or hoigne* or hay fever or hayfever or pollinos* or urticaria or hive or hives or immune fever or arthus or atopy or atopia or atopic or contact reaction or fpies or food protein induced enterocolitis or crossreacti* or cross reacti* or eoe or immunotherap* or scit or desensiti* or de-sensiti* or hyposensiti* therap*).mp. (553243)

15 ((chemical or drug* or medication* or food* or environmental or pollen* or contact or mold or mould or ragweed or hay* or dust or dander or pet or dog or cat or egg* or milk* or dairy or peanut* or nut* or cashew* or almond* or walnut* or hazelnut* or pecan* or pistachio* or coconut* or nutmeg* or fish or shellfish or seafood or crustacean* or wheat or barley or soy* or sesame or sunflower* or poppy* or mustard* or insect* or additive* or dye* or sulphite* or bee or bees or wasp* or arthropod* or hymenopter* or vespid* or cockroach* or pine*) adj4 sensitiv*).mp. (27226)

16. ((drug* or medica*) adj3 (dermatitis or morbiliform* or morbilliform* or exanthem*)).mp

17. (eosinophil* adj2 (esophagiti* or oesophagiti*)).mp

18 or/13-17 (763715)

19 7 and 12 and 18 (128)

20 limit 19 to yr="2019 -Current" (121)

***************************

237

PDF

Reviews received at journal
18 Apr, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
17 Apr, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
16 Apr, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
15 Apr, 2022
Editor invited by journal
15 Apr, 2022
First submitted to journal
13 Apr, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

vACcine COnfidence amongst those living with alleRgy during the coviD pandemic (ACCORD): a scoping review protocol

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Methods And Analysis

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Tables

Status:

Version 1