3.2. Determining the optimum curvature
The results for determining the optimum curvature for the installed flange are presented. In this study, the straight vertical flange is exposed to bending. Various curvatures are examined to find the optimum curvature that produced the maximum mean velocity within the wind turbine shroud. To summarize the results, only five studied cases are presented here. Figure. 7 shows the mean velocity profiles at the inlet of the shroud with straight vertical flange (case 1) and shrouds with carved flanges with curvature angles of 1.518 degrees (case 2), 14.840 degrees (case 3), 27.920 degrees (case 4) and 33.521 degrees (case 5). The inlet flow mean velocity continues to increase until reaching maxima and then due to over bending of the flange, the inlet mean velocity starts to decrease. The non-dimensional mean velocity magnitude throughout of inlet section of case 4 is higher than the others. This figure expresses that the effect of flange curvature on shroud internal flow is to increase the internal flow mean velocity. It should be noted that these results are based solely on the design performed on the flange and numerical uncertainty has no role in these results.
Table 2 shows the average non-dimensional inlet mean velocity for all cases. This must be kept in mind that according to Leloudas et al. [11], these models are two-dimensionally simulated but the changing trend can be cited acceptably.
Table 2 The values of average non-dimensional inlet mean velocity and its increase percentage for cases 1–5
Case number
|
Average mean u/U0
|
Increase percentage
|
Case 1
|
1.558
|
-
|
Case 2
|
1.563
|
0.320%
|
Case 3
|
1.582
|
1.540%
|
Case 4
|
1.587
|
2.850%
|
Case 5
|
1.565
|
0.449%
|
Figure 9 shows the mean velocity profile just behind the shroud for cases 1 to 5. Figure 8 shows the two-dimensional shroud and the station behind it, where the average velocities are measured in this section.
In Fig. 9, it is clear that for case 4, severe vortices occur at the station shown in Fig. 8, around the flange, resulting from the very intense vortices created by case 4. These vortices are exactly the same vortices that create a low-pressure area behind the shroud and consequently increase the mean velocity of air passing through the shroud. The other four geometries, due to the aerodynamic form of their flange, almost have similar and monotonous profile shapes.
Figure10 shows the velocity contour of a three-dimensional geometry cross section with numerical values of the contour. What is clear in this figure is that the velocity along the shroud, while using an optimal curved flange and an circular circular vortex, is higher than when the shroud is equipped with only a vertical straight flange. Behind of the shroud, in the case of an optimal curved flange and a circular vortex generator are used on the shroud, stronger vortices can be seen than the shroud with a simple flange. Based on the results of this contour, it is proved that changing the geometry of the flange from vertical to curved with a suitable angle of curvature and using a circular vortex generator will have a positive effect on increasing the air flow through the shroud.
Figure 11 (a) shows non-dimensional mean velocity behind shroud ,at the station shown in Fig. 8, for cases 1 to 5. The vertical axis in this image is the ratio of the non-dimensional mean velocity over the entire area behind the shroud. Accordingly, the highest value is for case 4. Also, the increase in entry mean velocity to the shroud can be examined from the perspective of the average turbulence kinetic energy at the stations behind the shroud. The flanges installed at the end of the shroud create vortices that the deformation of the flange towards the optimal point increases the strength of these vortices. Therefore, the amount of turbulence caused by vortices should also be increased. Figure 11 (b) shows non-dimensional average turbulence kinetic energy behind the shroud, at the station shown in Fig. 8. From this figure, it follows that by examining different cases, by moving towards the flange with the optimal curved shape, the amount of turbulence kinetic energy will also increase and after passing this point, it will start a decreasing process. This finding agrees with the results obtained from the mean velocity survey section at the shroud entrance.
3.3. Comparison of the 3D shroud with optimal curved flange and circular vortex generator performance with the functionality of vertical straight flange shroud
In this section, the results obtained from the numerical simulation of a shroud equipped with a flange with an optimal curved shape, as the first innovation, and a shroud with a simple straight vertical flange are investigated. The purposes of presenting the results of this simulation are to compare the mean velocity in the part where the turbine is located, called the turbine part. Based on the preceding section results, it was found that the location of the turbine should be 118.8 mm away from the inlet of the turbine, the throat. Also, based on the suggestions presented in previous researches, the drag force on the whole shroud structure has been calculated and reported. Therefore, structural engineers can design and select the appropriate materials. In addition to using the optimal curved flange, another innovation that has been done in this work is the use of a circular vortex generator on the body of the shroud. This vortex generator creates a greater pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of the shroud. This greater pressure difference increases the flow of air through the shroud and increases the turbine power as well. Table 3 shows the non-dimensional average mean velocity at the turbine section and its increased percentage for shrouds equipped with optimal curved flange with and without vortex generator and that equipped only with vertical straight flange.
Table 3 The values of non-dimensional average mean velocity in the turbine section and its increase percentage for shroud with simple and optimum curved flanges with and without circular vortex generator
Models
|
u/U0
|
Increase percentage
|
Shroud + simple vertical flange
|
2.379
|
-
|
Shroud + optimal curved flange
|
2.470
|
3.825
|
Shroud + optimal curved flange + vortex generator
|
2.567
|
7.902
|
Therefore, based on the above results, it is obtained that the use of optimally curve-shaped flange can increase the airflow velocity ratio through the turbine section by 3.825%, and this is the first time that the flange deformation to an aerodynamic curved shape and optimization of it lead to an increase in mean velocity at the location of the turbine to this value. Another innovation that has been addressed in the present work is the use of circular vortex generators. According to the results obtained after connecting the vortex generator on the shroud, the speed ratio in the turbine section has increased to 2.567. This equates to a 7.902 percent increase in airflow velocity in the turbine section compared to when a shroud with a simple vertical flange is used. In this way, the vortex generator can be introduced as one of the new amplifying devices. Figure 12 shows the velocity contour at the turbine section for different situations. Figure 12 (a) shows the velocity contour around the turbine that has no shroud around it. Figure 12 (b) shows the velocity contour for a turbine in a shroud with an optimal curved flange equipped with a circular vortex generator. Figure 12 shows that with the use of new amplification methods, the velocity of the airflow in the turbine section grows, and consequently the rotation speed of the turbine blades increases. In Fig. 12 (a), the average velocity around the turbine blades is about 17 meters per second. In Fig. 12 (b), the velocity of airflow around the turbine is about 38 meters per second. By comparing this value with the amount of air velocity passing around the turbine without any shroud, it is obtained that the use of optimized curved flange and a circular vortex generator increases the air velocity passing around the turbine by 123.5%.
Based on the suggestions given in the works of the past, drag force information needed by structural engineers is provided. In this step, the total drag on the whole structure is examined. The results of this study can be useful in selecting the correct shape and materials for the construction of a wind turbine installation tower. Due to the strong pressure difference between the front and rear of the shroud, which is the main purpose of the present study, more drag force is applied to the shroud. This drag force is eventually transmitted to the turbine tower and this structure must have sufficient resistance to overcome the drag force. Table 4 shows the amount of drag on the shroud with a simple flange and the shroud with an optimal aerodynamic curved flange. The use of a curved flange with an optimal curved shape can increase the drag force applied to the shroud by 27.065%. Therefore, the use of stronger structures is required to build a turbine tower that can withstand this increase in drag force well when a shroud with a curved flange is used.
Table 4 The values of total drag force on shroud with simple and optimum curved flanges and its increase percentage
Models
|
Total drag force(kN)
|
Increase percentage
|
Shroud + simple vertical flange
|
30.400
|
-
|
Shroud + optimal curved flange
|
38.628
|
27.065
|
3.4. Effect of the curved flange and circular vortex generator on turbine angular velocity and turbine power factor
Creating a curve on the flange will increase the airflow through the shroud, which can create stronger aerodynamic forces on the turbine blades. In Table 5a comparison is made between turbines in a shroud with straight vertical flange, shroud with curved flange equipped with and without circular vortex generator, and also turbine without any shroud. Using a dynamic grid around the turbine, Table 5 presents the results of turbine torque and obtained angular velocity in different configurations as well as the corresponding power coefficient in the same wind velocity. The bare turbine is capable of producing a torque of 0.123 N.m, angular velocity of 138.005 rad/s, and power factor of 0.141 at wind speeds of 15 m/s. Using a shroud with a straight flange, the torque is increased by 156.097 percent to 0.315 N.m. The rotational velocity increases by 56.787% to 216.375 rad/s. Also, the power factor reaches 0.568, which indicates an increase of 302.836% compared to the turbine without a shroud configuration. Using the turbine in a shroud with optimal curved flange, the amount of torque, angular velocity, and power factor compared to turbines in a shroud with simple vertical flange has increased by 10.793%, 3.810%, and 15.140%, respectively. By installing a circular vortex generator these percentages will be equal to 14.285%, 7.937%, and 23.415%, respectively.
Table 5 Various specifications for different shroud models
Model
|
Total force(N)
|
Torque(N.m)
|
Obtained rotational velocity(rad/s)
|
Power coefficient
|
Increase of power coefficient relative to the bare turbine
|
Bare
|
1.257
|
0.123
|
138.005
|
0.141
|
-
|
Straight
|
3.09
|
0.315
|
216.375
|
0.568
|
302.836
|
Curved
|
3.330
|
0.349
|
224.620
|
0.654
|
363.829
|
Curved + VG
|
3.600
|
0.360
|
233.549
|
0.701
|
397.163
|